Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

When your memory goes, forget it!


arts / rec.music.classical.recordings / Re: Shostakovich Symphonies

SubjectAuthor
o Re: Shostakovich Symphoniesgggg gggg

1
Re: Shostakovich Symphonies

<05733a56-34b0-4b5f-a235-d73e5f2277aen@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=39513&group=rec.music.classical.recordings#39513

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
X-Received: by 2002:a37:bc8:0:b0:69f:a898:cefb with SMTP id 191-20020a370bc8000000b0069fa898cefbmr18084306qkl.525.1651737939550;
Thu, 05 May 2022 01:05:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a81:134a:0:b0:2f8:6751:bd66 with SMTP id
71-20020a81134a000000b002f86751bd66mr22795223ywt.340.1651737939348; Thu, 05
May 2022 01:05:39 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!paganini.bofh.team!pasdenom.info!usenet-fr.net!fdn.fr!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
Date: Thu, 5 May 2022 01:05:39 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <45is35lm27rci9a9rm48t8l96u0jpsrfjg@4ax.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=32.132.12.210; posting-account=VREO7AoAAABGo_TnRXAj3kKbki4Qex7X
NNTP-Posting-Host: 32.132.12.210
References: <45is35lm27rci9a9rm48t8l96u0jpsrfjg@4ax.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <05733a56-34b0-4b5f-a235-d73e5f2277aen@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Shostakovich Symphonies
From: ggggg9...@gmail.com (gggg gggg)
Injection-Date: Thu, 05 May 2022 08:05:39 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
 by: gggg gggg - Thu, 5 May 2022 08:05 UTC

On Sunday, June 21, 2009 at 4:53:03 AM UTC-10, Juan I. Cahis wrote:
> Dear friends:
> I am trying to install a sub-set of Shostakovich Symphonies in my
> iPod, and I want to share with you the criteria for selecting them,
> because, in my opinion, there are some that they are very good and
> some that they are very ugly.
> In my opinion:
> 1) The best ones: No. 4, No, 15, No.6 and No. 10, No. 5, No. 1,
> in that order.
> 2) The ugliest ones: No. 2, No. 3, No. 7, No. 12 (although its
> principal tune is very good, it is a pity that DSCH didn't use it in a
> better work).
> 3) The good ones but I have doubts about them: No. 8 and No. 9
> (are they so good?), No. 13 (apart of the two first movements which
> are outstanding, is the rest so good? Is maybe "Stenka Razin" much
> better?), No. 14 (does it work as a "Symphony"?)
> 4) The normally accepted as "ugly", but that I have some doubts
> about its classification: No. 11 (is it so bad as the critics say?)
> Your comments about the four classification items above will be
> greatly welcome!!!!!!!!!
>
> Thanks
> Juan I. Cahis
> Santiago de Chile (South America)
> Note: Please forgive me for my bad English, I am trying to improve it!

(Recent Y. upload):

Repertoire: The BEST Shostakovich Symphony No. 1

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.8
clearnet tor