novaBBS - rec.music.classical.recordings - Re: The Rubinstein Effect?

Re: The Rubinstein Effect?

<c3bd8f5f-29e2-4021-9bb4-31bfd901edfcn@googlegroups.com>

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=39620&group=rec.music.classical.recordings#39620

copy link Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings

X-Received: by 2002:ae9:de43:0:b0:69f:7585:8276 with SMTP id s64-20020ae9de43000000b0069f75858276mr14254494qkf.706.1652167406418;
Tue, 10 May 2022 00:23:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:48c8:0:b0:648:be07:a758 with SMTP id
v191-20020a2548c8000000b00648be07a758mr17570603yba.346.1652167406201; Tue, 10
May 2022 00:23:26 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 00:23:25 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <7597d326-ca95-483c-ac0b-75a0a75a9021@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=32.132.12.210; posting-account=VREO7AoAAABGo_TnRXAj3kKbki4Qex7X
NNTP-Posting-Host: 32.132.12.210
References: <dbf3b4de-da0f-475b-9b3a-a6ed2d50bf16@googlegroups.com>
<7e560a55-8f0d-446d-9785-eb52a508ac35@googlegroups.com> <7597d326-ca95-483c-ac0b-75a0a75a9021@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <c3bd8f5f-29e2-4021-9bb4-31bfd901edfcn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: The Rubinstein Effect?
From: ggggg9...@gmail.com (gggg gggg)
Injection-Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 07:23:26 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 2455

by: gggg gggg - Tue, 10 May 2022 07:23 UTC

On Wednesday, October 8, 2014 at 10:28:48 AM UTC-10, Willem Orange wrote:
> On Wednesday, October 8, 2014 4:08:51 PM UTC-4, Herman wrote:
> > On Wednesday, October 8, 2014 10:03:34 PM UTC+2, rote:
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> >
> > > Which may explain why critics seem to miss more technical imperfections than one would think they should?
> >
> >
> >
> > It's not the job of critic to make a mistakes report.
> He didn't say it was - he was asking whether experiencing a performance live can lessen the effect of errors in a way that just hearing the audio of a performance cannot. Does the total live experience lessen the impact of any technical errors - I think it can and its certainly true with singers.

Is the following a case of that?:

- Miss Mödl is a shining example of an artist whose dramatic and musical intelligence triumphs over fundamental vocal weaknesses, making us forgive them through the sheer magnetism of her performances.

(See the descriptive notes of the following Y. upload):

"Martha Mödl; "Im Treibhaus"; (1955 Orchestra); WESENDONCK LIEDER; Richard Wagner"

Most burning issues generate far more heat than light.

arts / rec.music.classical.recordings / Re: The Rubinstein Effect?

Subject	Author
Re: The Rubinstein Effect?	gggg gggg