Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

19 May, 2024: Line wrapping has been changed to be more consistent with Usenet standards.
 If you find that it is broken please let me know here rocksolid.nodes.help


arts / rec.music.classical.recordings / Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?

SubjectAuthor
* Problem with Gieseking Warner box?Jonathan Ben Schragadove
`* Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?Invocation
 +* Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?Jonathan Ben Schragadove
 |`* Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?drh8h
 | `* Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?Jonathan Ben Schragadove
 |  `* Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?George
 |   `* Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?drh8h
 |    `- Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?George
 `* Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?Pluted Pup
  `* Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?Invocation
   `* Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?Pluted Pup
    +* Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?Stefan Huber
    |`- Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?Frank Berger
    `* Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?drh8h
     +* Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?George
     |`* Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?drh8h
     | `- Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?George
     +- Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?Jonathan Ben Schragadove
     `* Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?Pluted Pup
      `* Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?drh8h
       `* Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?Pluted Pup
        +* Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?drh8h
        |+* Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?Pluted Pup
        ||`* Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?vhorowitz
        || +* Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?Oscar
        || |`- Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?vhorowitz
        || `- Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?Dan Koren
        |`* Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?Dan Koren
        | `* Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?Al Eisner
        |  `* Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?Dan Koren
        |   `* Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?Owen Hartnett
        |    `* Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?raymond....@gmail.com
        |     `- Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?Owen Hartnett
        `- Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?Pluted Pup

Pages:12
Problem with Gieseking Warner box?

<e177e92e-1fe4-49f5-abfa-b94ea1d0b1bbn@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=48634&group=rec.music.classical.recordings#48634

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:683:0:b0:3a5:8b71:cca3 with SMTP id f3-20020ac80683000000b003a58b71cca3mr60485780qth.292.1669876144879;
Wed, 30 Nov 2022 22:29:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:7f93:0:b0:66d:a36d:e993 with SMTP id
t19-20020a9d7f93000000b0066da36de993mr31619272otp.280.1669876144622; Wed, 30
Nov 2022 22:29:04 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 22:29:04 -0800 (PST)
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2603:8001:b400:e9ff:688b:d09c:4c50:bfbe;
posting-account=1kU88AoAAABiHm0FixoGeB6DAYPpoztB
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2603:8001:b400:e9ff:688b:d09c:4c50:bfbe
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <e177e92e-1fe4-49f5-abfa-b94ea1d0b1bbn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?
From: ybschrag...@gmail.com (Jonathan Ben Schragadove)
Injection-Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2022 06:29:04 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 1411
 by: Jonathan Ben Schraga - Thu, 1 Dec 2022 06:29 UTC

Started sampling some of the discs in the new Gieseking boxed set on Warner, and on some of the 1930's tracks I'm wondering if there are issues with the remastering: an annoying ringing tone. There is a review on Amazon that describes this in more detail. Anyone else hearing things?

Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?

<a46c1208-6685-4d54-b66c-0409e988e27fn@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=48648&group=rec.music.classical.recordings#48648

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
X-Received: by 2002:ad4:52e8:0:b0:4c6:adf6:e74b with SMTP id p8-20020ad452e8000000b004c6adf6e74bmr49218663qvu.63.1669925885296;
Thu, 01 Dec 2022 12:18:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:4812:0:b0:66d:1e19:684b with SMTP id
c18-20020a9d4812000000b0066d1e19684bmr34754524otf.44.1669925885011; Thu, 01
Dec 2022 12:18:05 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2022 12:18:04 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <e177e92e-1fe4-49f5-abfa-b94ea1d0b1bbn@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=128.230.119.42; posting-account=tN-P8woAAAA-mqJHLRkHMuYt6JyRZ7fl
NNTP-Posting-Host: 128.230.119.42
References: <e177e92e-1fe4-49f5-abfa-b94ea1d0b1bbn@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <a46c1208-6685-4d54-b66c-0409e988e27fn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?
From: librashi...@gmail.com (Invocation)
Injection-Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2022 20:18:05 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 1666
 by: Invocation - Thu, 1 Dec 2022 20:18 UTC

Yes, it is pretty obvious. I am wondering if Warner will redo those problematic tracks.

On Thursday, December 1, 2022 at 1:29:07 AM UTC-5, Jonathan Ben Schragadove wrote:
> Started sampling some of the discs in the new Gieseking boxed set on Warner, and on some of the 1930's tracks I'm wondering if there are issues with the remastering: an annoying ringing tone. There is a review on Amazon that describes this in more detail. Anyone else hearing things?

Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?

<203279af-4eef-49d6-9d64-184ff3c86a38n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=48655&group=rec.music.classical.recordings#48655

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
X-Received: by 2002:ae9:e919:0:b0:6e0:90df:228f with SMTP id x25-20020ae9e919000000b006e090df228fmr44186388qkf.756.1669937728969;
Thu, 01 Dec 2022 15:35:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6871:581:b0:143:a10:26e8 with SMTP id
u1-20020a056871058100b001430a1026e8mr26344889oan.121.1669937728749; Thu, 01
Dec 2022 15:35:28 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2022 15:35:28 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <a46c1208-6685-4d54-b66c-0409e988e27fn@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2603:8001:b400:e9ff:688b:d09c:4c50:bfbe;
posting-account=1kU88AoAAABiHm0FixoGeB6DAYPpoztB
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2603:8001:b400:e9ff:688b:d09c:4c50:bfbe
References: <e177e92e-1fe4-49f5-abfa-b94ea1d0b1bbn@googlegroups.com> <a46c1208-6685-4d54-b66c-0409e988e27fn@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <203279af-4eef-49d6-9d64-184ff3c86a38n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?
From: ybschrag...@gmail.com (Jonathan Ben Schragadove)
Injection-Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2022 23:35:28 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 1960
 by: Jonathan Ben Schraga - Thu, 1 Dec 2022 23:35 UTC

On Thursday, December 1, 2022 at 12:18:07 PM UTC-8, Invocation wrote:
> Yes, it is pretty obvious. I am wondering if Warner will redo those problematic tracks.
> On Thursday, December 1, 2022 at 1:29:07 AM UTC-5, Jonathan Ben Schragadove wrote:
> > Started sampling some of the discs in the new Gieseking boxed set on Warner, and on some of the 1930's tracks I'm wondering if there are issues with the remastering: an annoying ringing tone. There is a review on Amazon that describes this in more detail. Anyone else hearing things?
Thanks for confirming. The later material that I've listened to so far sounds fine.

Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?

<0001HW.29397EB501A2F17230B47638F@news.giganews.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=48656&group=rec.music.classical.recordings#48656

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2022 00:30:45 +0000
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2022 16:30:45 -0800
From: pluted...@outlook.com (Pluted Pup)
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Hogwasher/5.24
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <0001HW.29397EB501A2F17230B47638F@news.giganews.com>
Subject: Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?
Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
References: <e177e92e-1fe4-49f5-abfa-b94ea1d0b1bbn@googlegroups.com> <a46c1208-6685-4d54-b66c-0409e988e27fn@googlegroups.com>
Lines: 9
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-cjKL0fiBhihvgaEIw7GKI2FSyTFpP9yR70PmARJydV1ejcgUt2idBRO/cfpWY21hgsZj8mSsPHd1QoZ!UqY61SDgOOWhE6sQy3vio5HOpMbAfCffALlFeMUxqFfXmXRDkLL1Oj+t9cnQ+FdTba6Gw2zLmW8e!VcecsQ==
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
 by: Pluted Pup - Fri, 2 Dec 2022 00:30 UTC

On Thu, 01 Dec 2022 12:18:04 -0800, Invocation wrote:

> Yes, it is pretty obvious. I am wondering if Warner will redo those problematic tracks.
>
> On Thursday, December 1, 2022 at 1:29:07 AM UTC-5, Jonathan Ben Schragadove wrote:
> > Started sampling some of the discs in the new Gieseking boxed set on Warner, and on some of the 1930's tracks I'm wondering if there are issues with the remastering: an annoying ringing tone. There is a review on Amazon that describes this in more detail. Anyone else hearing things?

Is the ringing sound from Noise Reduction?

Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?

<83418327-2056-45d6-8a7c-b9f593937243n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=48657&group=rec.music.classical.recordings#48657

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:4884:b0:6fb:c38e:27bf with SMTP id ea4-20020a05620a488400b006fbc38e27bfmr61247428qkb.351.1669941965775;
Thu, 01 Dec 2022 16:46:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:6113:b0:66d:d352:fbab with SMTP id
ca19-20020a056830611300b0066dd352fbabmr32322183otb.17.1669941965571; Thu, 01
Dec 2022 16:46:05 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2022 16:46:05 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <203279af-4eef-49d6-9d64-184ff3c86a38n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2601:249:4200:4b70:95af:1fdf:e1dd:acfa;
posting-account=4eVz2AkAAADPSgaKcgujKj0uI1BpyQWj
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2601:249:4200:4b70:95af:1fdf:e1dd:acfa
References: <e177e92e-1fe4-49f5-abfa-b94ea1d0b1bbn@googlegroups.com>
<a46c1208-6685-4d54-b66c-0409e988e27fn@googlegroups.com> <203279af-4eef-49d6-9d64-184ff3c86a38n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <83418327-2056-45d6-8a7c-b9f593937243n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?
From: drh...@mac.com (drh8h)
Injection-Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2022 00:46:05 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 2468
 by: drh8h - Fri, 2 Dec 2022 00:46 UTC

On Thursday, December 1, 2022 at 6:35:31 PM UTC-5, Jonathan Ben Schragadove wrote:
> On Thursday, December 1, 2022 at 12:18:07 PM UTC-8, Invocation wrote:
> > Yes, it is pretty obvious. I am wondering if Warner will redo those problematic tracks.
> > On Thursday, December 1, 2022 at 1:29:07 AM UTC-5, Jonathan Ben Schragadove wrote:
> > > Started sampling some of the discs in the new Gieseking boxed set on Warner, and on some of the 1930's tracks I'm wondering if there are issues with the remastering: an annoying ringing tone. There is a review on Amazon that describes this in more detail. Anyone else hearing things?
> Thanks for confirming. The later material that I've listened to so far sounds fine.

Do you remember any specific tracks, pieces obviously afflicted? The box has not been issued yet in the U.S. If it becomes suddenly unavailable for awhile, we will know what happened. The Amazon reviewer cites discs 1, 2 and 6. The first two discs include the mostly acoustical Homochord recordings which APR issued years ago in first-rate transfers.

DH

Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?

<c4c0b813-37aa-4567-aa9a-2d72005e61fdn@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=48677&group=rec.music.classical.recordings#48677

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:4305:b0:4bb:e8a8:46b7 with SMTP id oe5-20020a056214430500b004bbe8a846b7mr52575995qvb.43.1670024873398;
Fri, 02 Dec 2022 15:47:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:6442:0:b0:66c:5685:5415 with SMTP id
m2-20020a9d6442000000b0066c56855415mr37124528otl.125.1670024873109; Fri, 02
Dec 2022 15:47:53 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2022 15:47:52 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <83418327-2056-45d6-8a7c-b9f593937243n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2603:8001:b400:e9ff:688b:d09c:4c50:bfbe;
posting-account=1kU88AoAAABiHm0FixoGeB6DAYPpoztB
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2603:8001:b400:e9ff:688b:d09c:4c50:bfbe
References: <e177e92e-1fe4-49f5-abfa-b94ea1d0b1bbn@googlegroups.com>
<a46c1208-6685-4d54-b66c-0409e988e27fn@googlegroups.com> <203279af-4eef-49d6-9d64-184ff3c86a38n@googlegroups.com>
<83418327-2056-45d6-8a7c-b9f593937243n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <c4c0b813-37aa-4567-aa9a-2d72005e61fdn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?
From: ybschrag...@gmail.com (Jonathan Ben Schragadove)
Injection-Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2022 23:47:53 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 2734
 by: Jonathan Ben Schraga - Fri, 2 Dec 2022 23:47 UTC

On Thursday, December 1, 2022 at 4:46:08 PM UTC-8, drh8h wrote:
> On Thursday, December 1, 2022 at 6:35:31 PM UTC-5, Jonathan Ben Schragadove wrote:
> > On Thursday, December 1, 2022 at 12:18:07 PM UTC-8, Invocation wrote:
> > > Yes, it is pretty obvious. I am wondering if Warner will redo those problematic tracks.
> > > On Thursday, December 1, 2022 at 1:29:07 AM UTC-5, Jonathan Ben Schragadove wrote:
> > > > Started sampling some of the discs in the new Gieseking boxed set on Warner, and on some of the 1930's tracks I'm wondering if there are issues with the remastering: an annoying ringing tone. There is a review on Amazon that describes this in more detail. Anyone else hearing things?
> > Thanks for confirming. The later material that I've listened to so far sounds fine.
> Do you remember any specific tracks, pieces obviously afflicted? The box has not been issued yet in the U.S. If it becomes suddenly unavailable for awhile, we will know what happened. The Amazon reviewer cites discs 1, 2 and 6. The first two discs include the mostly acoustical Homochord recordings which APR issued years ago in first-rate transfers.
>
> DH
I first became aware of it when listening to Disc 4, track 9 (Mozart, from 1936).

Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?

<282c520d-4df6-41f8-9770-0acb4dbba755n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=48722&group=rec.music.classical.recordings#48722

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
X-Received: by 2002:a37:4642:0:b0:6fc:a03e:fcdf with SMTP id t63-20020a374642000000b006fca03efcdfmr13196645qka.139.1670082628938;
Sat, 03 Dec 2022 07:50:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:aca:a815:0:b0:35c:dee:db96 with SMTP id
r21-20020acaa815000000b0035c0deedb96mr1065735oie.235.1670082628553; Sat, 03
Dec 2022 07:50:28 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2022 07:50:28 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <c4c0b813-37aa-4567-aa9a-2d72005e61fdn@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=96.224.14.126; posting-account=UrM6gAoAAADicMjz_3BA-a-gnNcHBzY5
NNTP-Posting-Host: 96.224.14.126
References: <e177e92e-1fe4-49f5-abfa-b94ea1d0b1bbn@googlegroups.com>
<a46c1208-6685-4d54-b66c-0409e988e27fn@googlegroups.com> <203279af-4eef-49d6-9d64-184ff3c86a38n@googlegroups.com>
<83418327-2056-45d6-8a7c-b9f593937243n@googlegroups.com> <c4c0b813-37aa-4567-aa9a-2d72005e61fdn@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <282c520d-4df6-41f8-9770-0acb4dbba755n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?
From: baritone...@gmail.com (George)
Injection-Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2022 15:50:28 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 2869
 by: George - Sat, 3 Dec 2022 15:50 UTC

On Friday, December 2, 2022 at 6:47:55 PM UTC-5, Jonathan Ben Schragadove wrote:
> On Thursday, December 1, 2022 at 4:46:08 PM UTC-8, drh8h wrote:
> > On Thursday, December 1, 2022 at 6:35:31 PM UTC-5, Jonathan Ben Schragadove wrote:
> > > On Thursday, December 1, 2022 at 12:18:07 PM UTC-8, Invocation wrote:
> > > > Yes, it is pretty obvious. I am wondering if Warner will redo those problematic tracks.
> > > > On Thursday, December 1, 2022 at 1:29:07 AM UTC-5, Jonathan Ben Schragadove wrote:
> > > > > Started sampling some of the discs in the new Gieseking boxed set on Warner, and on some of the 1930's tracks I'm wondering if there are issues with the remastering: an annoying ringing tone. There is a review on Amazon that describes this in more detail. Anyone else hearing things?
> > > Thanks for confirming. The later material that I've listened to so far sounds fine.
> > Do you remember any specific tracks, pieces obviously afflicted? The box has not been issued yet in the U.S. If it becomes suddenly unavailable for awhile, we will know what happened. The Amazon reviewer cites discs 1, 2 and 6. The first two discs include the mostly acoustical Homochord recordings which APR issued years ago in first-rate transfers.
> >
> > DH
> I first became aware of it when listening to Disc 4, track 9 (Mozart, from 1936).

Who did the transfers on this set?

Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?

<4a08ff94-fe0b-4ba7-9513-46f01d1d8c6bn@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=48723&group=rec.music.classical.recordings#48723

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:a0b:b0:4c6:f93f:1cfa with SMTP id dw11-20020a0562140a0b00b004c6f93f1cfamr30121305qvb.49.1670085823463;
Sat, 03 Dec 2022 08:43:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:bc0a:b0:13b:e58a:9680 with SMTP id
oa10-20020a056870bc0a00b0013be58a9680mr35114376oab.0.1670085823260; Sat, 03
Dec 2022 08:43:43 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2022 08:43:42 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <282c520d-4df6-41f8-9770-0acb4dbba755n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2601:249:4200:4b70:893f:35b:76ec:682f;
posting-account=4eVz2AkAAADPSgaKcgujKj0uI1BpyQWj
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2601:249:4200:4b70:893f:35b:76ec:682f
References: <e177e92e-1fe4-49f5-abfa-b94ea1d0b1bbn@googlegroups.com>
<a46c1208-6685-4d54-b66c-0409e988e27fn@googlegroups.com> <203279af-4eef-49d6-9d64-184ff3c86a38n@googlegroups.com>
<83418327-2056-45d6-8a7c-b9f593937243n@googlegroups.com> <c4c0b813-37aa-4567-aa9a-2d72005e61fdn@googlegroups.com>
<282c520d-4df6-41f8-9770-0acb4dbba755n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <4a08ff94-fe0b-4ba7-9513-46f01d1d8c6bn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?
From: drh...@mac.com (drh8h)
Injection-Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2022 16:43:43 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 3093
 by: drh8h - Sat, 3 Dec 2022 16:43 UTC

On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 10:50:31 AM UTC-5, George wrote:
> On Friday, December 2, 2022 at 6:47:55 PM UTC-5, Jonathan Ben Schragadove wrote:
> > On Thursday, December 1, 2022 at 4:46:08 PM UTC-8, drh8h wrote:
> > > On Thursday, December 1, 2022 at 6:35:31 PM UTC-5, Jonathan Ben Schragadove wrote:
> > > > On Thursday, December 1, 2022 at 12:18:07 PM UTC-8, Invocation wrote:
> > > > > Yes, it is pretty obvious. I am wondering if Warner will redo those problematic tracks.
> > > > > On Thursday, December 1, 2022 at 1:29:07 AM UTC-5, Jonathan Ben Schragadove wrote:
> > > > > > Started sampling some of the discs in the new Gieseking boxed set on Warner, and on some of the 1930's tracks I'm wondering if there are issues with the remastering: an annoying ringing tone. There is a review on Amazon that describes this in more detail. Anyone else hearing things?
> > > > Thanks for confirming. The later material that I've listened to so far sounds fine.
> > > Do you remember any specific tracks, pieces obviously afflicted? The box has not been issued yet in the U.S. If it becomes suddenly unavailable for awhile, we will know what happened. The Amazon reviewer cites discs 1, 2 and 6. The first two discs include the mostly acoustical Homochord recordings which APR issued years ago in first-rate transfers.
> > >
> > > DH
> > I first became aware of it when listening to Disc 4, track 9 (Mozart, from 1936).
> Who did the transfers on this set?

Art et Son Studio.

Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?

<d2994882-4fb7-46c2-ad9e-50d47baad636n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=48728&group=rec.music.classical.recordings#48728

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:4812:b0:398:fec:d89 with SMTP id fb18-20020a05622a481200b003980fec0d89mr53232102qtb.351.1670100484414;
Sat, 03 Dec 2022 12:48:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:b28a:b0:143:ffca:30c8 with SMTP id
c10-20020a056870b28a00b00143ffca30c8mr9766092oao.280.1670100484018; Sat, 03
Dec 2022 12:48:04 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2022 12:48:03 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <0001HW.29397EB501A2F17230B47638F@news.giganews.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2603:7080:7804:e4f7:b099:2199:8b48:b4ab;
posting-account=tN-P8woAAAA-mqJHLRkHMuYt6JyRZ7fl
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2603:7080:7804:e4f7:b099:2199:8b48:b4ab
References: <e177e92e-1fe4-49f5-abfa-b94ea1d0b1bbn@googlegroups.com>
<a46c1208-6685-4d54-b66c-0409e988e27fn@googlegroups.com> <0001HW.29397EB501A2F17230B47638F@news.giganews.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <d2994882-4fb7-46c2-ad9e-50d47baad636n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?
From: librashi...@gmail.com (Invocation)
Injection-Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2022 20:48:04 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 2103
 by: Invocation - Sat, 3 Dec 2022 20:48 UTC

The ringing sound is caused by using poor quality 78s discs.

On Thursday, December 1, 2022 at 7:30:53 PM UTC-5, Pluted Pup wrote:
> On Thu, 01 Dec 2022 12:18:04 -0800, Invocation wrote:
>
> > Yes, it is pretty obvious. I am wondering if Warner will redo those problematic tracks.
> >
> > On Thursday, December 1, 2022 at 1:29:07 AM UTC-5, Jonathan Ben Schragadove wrote:
> > > Started sampling some of the discs in the new Gieseking boxed set on Warner, and on some of the 1930's tracks I'm wondering if there are issues with the remastering: an annoying ringing tone. There is a review on Amazon that describes this in more detail. Anyone else hearing things?
> Is the ringing sound from Noise Reduction?

Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?

<7b45b647-c1cb-4f45-a797-8942ca95dfa5n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=48782&group=rec.music.classical.recordings#48782

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5148:0:b0:35c:d017:2fd7 with SMTP id h8-20020ac85148000000b0035cd0172fd7mr72311815qtn.579.1670162283065;
Sun, 04 Dec 2022 05:58:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:aca:ac4e:0:b0:35b:dbf0:339b with SMTP id
v75-20020acaac4e000000b0035bdbf0339bmr8402183oie.194.1670162282738; Sun, 04
Dec 2022 05:58:02 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2022 05:58:02 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4a08ff94-fe0b-4ba7-9513-46f01d1d8c6bn@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=96.224.14.126; posting-account=UrM6gAoAAADicMjz_3BA-a-gnNcHBzY5
NNTP-Posting-Host: 96.224.14.126
References: <e177e92e-1fe4-49f5-abfa-b94ea1d0b1bbn@googlegroups.com>
<a46c1208-6685-4d54-b66c-0409e988e27fn@googlegroups.com> <203279af-4eef-49d6-9d64-184ff3c86a38n@googlegroups.com>
<83418327-2056-45d6-8a7c-b9f593937243n@googlegroups.com> <c4c0b813-37aa-4567-aa9a-2d72005e61fdn@googlegroups.com>
<282c520d-4df6-41f8-9770-0acb4dbba755n@googlegroups.com> <4a08ff94-fe0b-4ba7-9513-46f01d1d8c6bn@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <7b45b647-c1cb-4f45-a797-8942ca95dfa5n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?
From: baritone...@gmail.com (George)
Injection-Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2022 13:58:03 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 3237
 by: George - Sun, 4 Dec 2022 13:58 UTC

On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 11:43:46 AM UTC-5, drh8h wrote:
> On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 10:50:31 AM UTC-5, George wrote:
> > On Friday, December 2, 2022 at 6:47:55 PM UTC-5, Jonathan Ben Schragadove wrote:
> > > On Thursday, December 1, 2022 at 4:46:08 PM UTC-8, drh8h wrote:
> > > > On Thursday, December 1, 2022 at 6:35:31 PM UTC-5, Jonathan Ben Schragadove wrote:
> > > > > On Thursday, December 1, 2022 at 12:18:07 PM UTC-8, Invocation wrote:
> > > > > > Yes, it is pretty obvious. I am wondering if Warner will redo those problematic tracks.
> > > > > > On Thursday, December 1, 2022 at 1:29:07 AM UTC-5, Jonathan Ben Schragadove wrote:
> > > > > > > Started sampling some of the discs in the new Gieseking boxed set on Warner, and on some of the 1930's tracks I'm wondering if there are issues with the remastering: an annoying ringing tone. There is a review on Amazon that describes this in more detail. Anyone else hearing things?
> > > > > Thanks for confirming. The later material that I've listened to so far sounds fine.
> > > > Do you remember any specific tracks, pieces obviously afflicted? The box has not been issued yet in the U.S. If it becomes suddenly unavailable for awhile, we will know what happened. The Amazon reviewer cites discs 1, 2 and 6. The first two discs include the mostly acoustical Homochord recordings which APR issued years ago in first-rate transfers.
> > > >
> > > > DH
> > > I first became aware of it when listening to Disc 4, track 9 (Mozart, from 1936).
> > Who did the transfers on this set?
> Art et Son Studio.

Thanks, that is good news.

Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?

<0001HW.293D16D501E0747D30AE5E38F@news.giganews.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=48785&group=rec.music.classical.recordings#48785

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2022 17:56:37 +0000
Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2022 09:56:37 -0800
From: pluted...@outlook.com (Pluted Pup)
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Hogwasher/5.24
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <0001HW.293D16D501E0747D30AE5E38F@news.giganews.com>
Subject: Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?
Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
References: <e177e92e-1fe4-49f5-abfa-b94ea1d0b1bbn@googlegroups.com> <a46c1208-6685-4d54-b66c-0409e988e27fn@googlegroups.com> <0001HW.29397EB501A2F17230B47638F@news.giganews.com> <d2994882-4fb7-46c2-ad9e-50d47baad636n@googlegroups.com>
Lines: 52
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-BinL8hm7wKClursGAIPSah4f4jo7CofI8dzjldsnANXLFiqDu2cOlMgo0qssHPlmjJz6/hQJlO4IN0Y!ohvmnfqc6yM7jnSoRp1E1cv+PV9MQfYnNWwUi9us8CHLtTGbvOAir1j//jG+ad/nGvRntoMF/c1M!ZzFIbA==
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
 by: Pluted Pup - Sun, 4 Dec 2022 17:56 UTC

On Sat, 03 Dec 2022 12:48:03 -0800, Invocation wrote:

> The ringing sound is caused by using poor quality 78s discs.

I don't know what the listeners are saying by "ringing" sound.
Are they just complaining about surface noise? But they say
it is a processing sound and 78 surface noise by itself doesn't
sound like ringing to me.

This amazon review doesn't say enough, I can't tell what is
being talked about, why is the Liszt Concerto unacceptable,
Presto saying it is from 1936, not from the early 1920's:

This is an early response based on sampling discs 1, 2, & 6.
Unfortunately there seems to be a fault in the production of
these discs. I'm well aware that these are very old recordings
and are bound to sound poor in comparison to Gieseking's later
recordings, but the issue I'm having both on my computer and on
my hi fi system is a digital ringing at roughly the freqency area
around and above piano middle C. I have made digital transfers of
old material myself and recall this issues as arising from some
lack of synchronisation in the DAC. Unfortunately, I don't have
the knowledge to diagnose the fault precisely. It is, however, a
fault. I've checked other historical recordings on my systems and
my ears, just to be certain that I can isolate it. There is
definitely an issue with this Warner edition. What should I do?
Will Warner recall the discs and replace the faulty ones? Since
I've sampled three discs so far and found the same fault on each
one, I'm not optimistic about the rest.

UPDATE. I started to listen to disc 3, which has the Liszt First
Piano Concerto. The sound of this is simply unacceptable for an
issue by a major company. There is considerable distortion and
that same digital ringing I noted on other discs. All of this
indicates an unbelievably sloppy job by whoever was employed to
do the transfers and a lack of checking further up the chain. I'm
surprised, because other Warner boxes, e.g. the Barbirolli, have
been excellent. I'm returning the set to Amazon and hope that
Warner will do the decent thing and bring all the discs in the
Gieseking set up to their usual high standard.

>
> On Thursday, December 1, 2022 at 7:30:53 PM UTC-5, Pluted Pup wrote:
> > On Thu, 01 Dec 2022 12:18:04 -0800, Invocation wrote:
> >
> > > Yes, it is pretty obvious. I am wondering if Warner will redo those problematic tracks.
> > >
> > > On Thursday, December 1, 2022 at 1:29:07 AM UTC-5, Jonathan Ben Schragadove wrote:
> > > > Started sampling some of the discs in the new Gieseking boxed set on Warner, and on some of the 1930's tracks I'm wondering if there are issues with the remastering: an annoying ringing tone. There is a review on Amazon that describes this in more detail. Anyone else hearing things?
> > Is the ringing sound from Noise Reduction?

Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?

<7b0d9538-68c7-46b2-8a91-8a2f2a1bb389n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=48901&group=rec.music.classical.recordings#48901

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:46da:0:b0:3a6:9121:cc26 with SMTP id h26-20020ac846da000000b003a69121cc26mr20391871qto.627.1670277493312;
Mon, 05 Dec 2022 13:58:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:3096:b0:355:ebd:8b3a with SMTP id
bl22-20020a056808309600b003550ebd8b3amr39222884oib.117.1670277493014; Mon, 05
Dec 2022 13:58:13 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2022 13:58:12 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <0001HW.293D16D501E0747D30AE5E38F@news.giganews.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2a02:8388:26c0:2080:7dba:7c13:3791:b132;
posting-account=AYAupAkAAAAVH0kEdVUMKNXOdIl8W4Lc
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2a02:8388:26c0:2080:7dba:7c13:3791:b132
References: <e177e92e-1fe4-49f5-abfa-b94ea1d0b1bbn@googlegroups.com>
<a46c1208-6685-4d54-b66c-0409e988e27fn@googlegroups.com> <0001HW.29397EB501A2F17230B47638F@news.giganews.com>
<d2994882-4fb7-46c2-ad9e-50d47baad636n@googlegroups.com> <0001HW.293D16D501E0747D30AE5E38F@news.giganews.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <7b0d9538-68c7-46b2-8a91-8a2f2a1bb389n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?
From: stefan.a...@gmail.com (Stefan Huber)
Injection-Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2022 21:58:13 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 1782
 by: Stefan Huber - Mon, 5 Dec 2022 21:58 UTC

It really doesn't sound like a problem with the source material to me - unless the source material happens to be a low resolution digital transfer ;) To me it seems if something happened during the CD mastering phase. I can't believe that a sound engineer would approve a recording sounding this way.

Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?

<YPqdnVN9av-47xP-nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@supernews.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=48903&group=rec.music.classical.recordings#48903

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.supernews.com!news.supernews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2022 22:35:17 +0000
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2022 17:35:17 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/102.5.1
Subject: Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?
Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
References: <e177e92e-1fe4-49f5-abfa-b94ea1d0b1bbn@googlegroups.com>
<a46c1208-6685-4d54-b66c-0409e988e27fn@googlegroups.com>
<0001HW.29397EB501A2F17230B47638F@news.giganews.com>
<d2994882-4fb7-46c2-ad9e-50d47baad636n@googlegroups.com>
<0001HW.293D16D501E0747D30AE5E38F@news.giganews.com>
<7b0d9538-68c7-46b2-8a91-8a2f2a1bb389n@googlegroups.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: frankdbe...@gmail.com (Frank Berger)
In-Reply-To: <7b0d9538-68c7-46b2-8a91-8a2f2a1bb389n@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <YPqdnVN9av-47xP-nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@supernews.com>
Lines: 4
X-Trace: sv3-l0nBA+epiUA2z0Pm2ssgqEwfYHU2ls16a/+tQqPMJIgSoyCdlIGxxGeVeLKGJoIJBseLsIzNNt7tC/I!i2oKGVgzsLUep4vTonr3f8Ztg0HSlFZfUCKvKU4elqQ5OrjTn+EpKnn9SlqpMb5KEubpn4Q6fyyk!264OiLS4DW8=
X-Complaints-To: www.supernews.com/docs/abuse.html
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: www.supernews.com/docs/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Received-Bytes: 1958
 by: Frank Berger - Mon, 5 Dec 2022 22:35 UTC

On 12/5/2022 4:58 PM, Stefan Huber wrote:
> It really doesn't sound like a problem with the source material to me - unless the source material happens to be a low resolution digital transfer ;) To me it seems if something happened during >the CD mastering phase. I can't believe that a sound engineer would approve a recording sounding this way.

Has anybody tried to contact Warner?

Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?

<008c3d69-c7c5-4d99-9421-908cec6ef31bn@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=50844&group=rec.music.classical.recordings#50844

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:4808:b0:706:38ab:54b7 with SMTP id eb8-20020a05620a480800b0070638ab54b7mr375764qkb.735.1674049251755;
Wed, 18 Jan 2023 05:40:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:2286:b0:363:a25:4fe7 with SMTP id
bo6-20020a056808228600b003630a254fe7mr353933oib.70.1674049251429; Wed, 18 Jan
2023 05:40:51 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 05:40:51 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <0001HW.293D16D501E0747D30AE5E38F@news.giganews.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2601:249:4200:4b70:cd50:9e8b:b2f9:8db1;
posting-account=4eVz2AkAAADPSgaKcgujKj0uI1BpyQWj
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2601:249:4200:4b70:cd50:9e8b:b2f9:8db1
References: <e177e92e-1fe4-49f5-abfa-b94ea1d0b1bbn@googlegroups.com>
<a46c1208-6685-4d54-b66c-0409e988e27fn@googlegroups.com> <0001HW.29397EB501A2F17230B47638F@news.giganews.com>
<d2994882-4fb7-46c2-ad9e-50d47baad636n@googlegroups.com> <0001HW.293D16D501E0747D30AE5E38F@news.giganews.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <008c3d69-c7c5-4d99-9421-908cec6ef31bn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?
From: drh...@mac.com (drh8h)
Injection-Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 13:40:51 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 5981
 by: drh8h - Wed, 18 Jan 2023 13:40 UTC

On Sunday, December 4, 2022 at 12:56:43 PM UTC-5, Pluted Pup wrote:
> On Sat, 03 Dec 2022 12:48:03 -0800, Invocation wrote:
>
> > The ringing sound is caused by using poor quality 78s discs.
> I don't know what the listeners are saying by "ringing" sound.
> Are they just complaining about surface noise? But they say
> it is a processing sound and 78 surface noise by itself doesn't
> sound like ringing to me.
>
> This amazon review doesn't say enough, I can't tell what is
> being talked about, why is the Liszt Concerto unacceptable,
> Presto saying it is from 1936, not from the early 1920's:
>
> This is an early response based on sampling discs 1, 2, & 6.
> Unfortunately there seems to be a fault in the production of
> these discs. I'm well aware that these are very old recordings
> and are bound to sound poor in comparison to Gieseking's later
> recordings, but the issue I'm having both on my computer and on
> my hi fi system is a digital ringing at roughly the freqency area
> around and above piano middle C. I have made digital transfers of
> old material myself and recall this issues as arising from some
> lack of synchronisation in the DAC. Unfortunately, I don't have
> the knowledge to diagnose the fault precisely. It is, however, a
> fault. I've checked other historical recordings on my systems and
> my ears, just to be certain that I can isolate it. There is
> definitely an issue with this Warner edition. What should I do?
> Will Warner recall the discs and replace the faulty ones? Since
> I've sampled three discs so far and found the same fault on each
> one, I'm not optimistic about the rest.
>
> UPDATE. I started to listen to disc 3, which has the Liszt First
> Piano Concerto. The sound of this is simply unacceptable for an
> issue by a major company. There is considerable distortion and
> that same digital ringing I noted on other discs. All of this
> indicates an unbelievably sloppy job by whoever was employed to
> do the transfers and a lack of checking further up the chain. I'm
> surprised, because other Warner boxes, e.g. the Barbirolli, have
> been excellent. I'm returning the set to Amazon and hope that
> Warner will do the decent thing and bring all the discs in the
> Gieseking set up to their usual high standard.
> >
> > On Thursday, December 1, 2022 at 7:30:53 PM UTC-5, Pluted Pup wrote:
> > > On Thu, 01 Dec 2022 12:18:04 -0800, Invocation wrote:
> > >
> > > > Yes, it is pretty obvious. I am wondering if Warner will redo those problematic tracks.
> > > >
> > > > On Thursday, December 1, 2022 at 1:29:07 AM UTC-5, Jonathan Ben Schragadove wrote:
> > > > > Started sampling some of the discs in the new Gieseking boxed set on Warner, and on some of the 1930's tracks I'm wondering if there are issues with the remastering: an annoying ringing tone. There is a review on Amazon that describes this in more detail. Anyone else hearing things?
> > > Is the ringing sound from Noise Reduction?

I just, finally, received this box yesterday, so haven't listened to much, but sampled some tracks and went through disc 1. Notably, some of the Homocords on that earliest disc are the Seth Winner transfers from the previous outstanding APR issue. I am not sure why they didn't use all of Seth's work.. There is not problem with any of "his" tracks. Gieseking completists need to get the APR because it includes the Brunswick recordings. The Mozart "Turkish" excerpt on disc 6 is similarly afflicted with the ringing sound. I have not the knowledge to know what the problem is, but I am guessing it occurred late in the mastering phase. As for the Liszt Concerto, what is most noticeable to me is the extremely worn condition of the first movement. I have wondered if Art & Son is limited mostly to whatever Warner has in their archives. Independents like Seth Winner, who had a Gieseking series on Pearl, and Ward Marston, who made a number of Gieseking transfers for Naxos, have access to a network of collectors and institutions and can track down the best copies from anywhere in the world. I mention this because it has happened before. In the otherwise outstanding Furtwängler complete set, the discs used by Art & Son for the Brahms 1 were in dire condition in complete contrast to the rest of the set.

Dennis H

Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?

<3c6833b0-1375-495b-9eba-d6729c2440bcn@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=50850&group=rec.music.classical.recordings#50850

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:580d:b0:531:d884:ee8d with SMTP id mk13-20020a056214580d00b00531d884ee8dmr365066qvb.20.1674069284847;
Wed, 18 Jan 2023 11:14:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:6607:b0:13c:c80:6b46 with SMTP id
gf7-20020a056870660700b0013c0c806b46mr581491oab.194.1674069284459; Wed, 18
Jan 2023 11:14:44 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 11:14:44 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <008c3d69-c7c5-4d99-9421-908cec6ef31bn@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=96.224.14.126; posting-account=UrM6gAoAAADicMjz_3BA-a-gnNcHBzY5
NNTP-Posting-Host: 96.224.14.126
References: <e177e92e-1fe4-49f5-abfa-b94ea1d0b1bbn@googlegroups.com>
<a46c1208-6685-4d54-b66c-0409e988e27fn@googlegroups.com> <0001HW.29397EB501A2F17230B47638F@news.giganews.com>
<d2994882-4fb7-46c2-ad9e-50d47baad636n@googlegroups.com> <0001HW.293D16D501E0747D30AE5E38F@news.giganews.com>
<008c3d69-c7c5-4d99-9421-908cec6ef31bn@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <3c6833b0-1375-495b-9eba-d6729c2440bcn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?
From: baritone...@gmail.com (George)
Injection-Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 19:14:44 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 6504
 by: George - Wed, 18 Jan 2023 19:14 UTC

On Wednesday, January 18, 2023 at 8:40:53 AM UTC-5, drh8h wrote:
> On Sunday, December 4, 2022 at 12:56:43 PM UTC-5, Pluted Pup wrote:
> > On Sat, 03 Dec 2022 12:48:03 -0800, Invocation wrote:
> >
> > > The ringing sound is caused by using poor quality 78s discs.
> > I don't know what the listeners are saying by "ringing" sound.
> > Are they just complaining about surface noise? But they say
> > it is a processing sound and 78 surface noise by itself doesn't
> > sound like ringing to me.
> >
> > This amazon review doesn't say enough, I can't tell what is
> > being talked about, why is the Liszt Concerto unacceptable,
> > Presto saying it is from 1936, not from the early 1920's:
> >
> > This is an early response based on sampling discs 1, 2, & 6.
> > Unfortunately there seems to be a fault in the production of
> > these discs. I'm well aware that these are very old recordings
> > and are bound to sound poor in comparison to Gieseking's later
> > recordings, but the issue I'm having both on my computer and on
> > my hi fi system is a digital ringing at roughly the freqency area
> > around and above piano middle C. I have made digital transfers of
> > old material myself and recall this issues as arising from some
> > lack of synchronisation in the DAC. Unfortunately, I don't have
> > the knowledge to diagnose the fault precisely. It is, however, a
> > fault. I've checked other historical recordings on my systems and
> > my ears, just to be certain that I can isolate it. There is
> > definitely an issue with this Warner edition. What should I do?
> > Will Warner recall the discs and replace the faulty ones? Since
> > I've sampled three discs so far and found the same fault on each
> > one, I'm not optimistic about the rest.
> >
> > UPDATE. I started to listen to disc 3, which has the Liszt First
> > Piano Concerto. The sound of this is simply unacceptable for an
> > issue by a major company. There is considerable distortion and
> > that same digital ringing I noted on other discs. All of this
> > indicates an unbelievably sloppy job by whoever was employed to
> > do the transfers and a lack of checking further up the chain. I'm
> > surprised, because other Warner boxes, e.g. the Barbirolli, have
> > been excellent. I'm returning the set to Amazon and hope that
> > Warner will do the decent thing and bring all the discs in the
> > Gieseking set up to their usual high standard.
> > >
> > > On Thursday, December 1, 2022 at 7:30:53 PM UTC-5, Pluted Pup wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 01 Dec 2022 12:18:04 -0800, Invocation wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Yes, it is pretty obvious. I am wondering if Warner will redo those problematic tracks.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thursday, December 1, 2022 at 1:29:07 AM UTC-5, Jonathan Ben Schragadove wrote:
> > > > > > Started sampling some of the discs in the new Gieseking boxed set on Warner, and on some of the 1930's tracks I'm wondering if there are issues with the remastering: an annoying ringing tone. There is a review on Amazon that describes this in more detail. Anyone else hearing things?
> > > > Is the ringing sound from Noise Reduction?
> I just, finally, received this box yesterday, so haven't listened to much, but sampled some tracks and went through disc 1. Notably, some of the Homocords on that earliest disc are the Seth Winner transfers from the previous outstanding APR issue. I am not sure why they didn't use all of Seth's work. There is not problem with any of "his" tracks. Gieseking completists need to get the APR because it includes the Brunswick recordings. The Mozart "Turkish" excerpt on disc 6 is similarly afflicted with the ringing sound. I have not the knowledge to know what the problem is, but I am guessing it occurred late in the mastering phase. As for the Liszt Concerto, what is most noticeable to me is the extremely worn condition of the first movement. I have wondered if Art & Son is limited mostly to whatever Warner has in their archives. Independents like Seth Winner, who had a Gieseking series on Pearl, and Ward Marston, who made a number of Gieseking transfers for Naxos, have access to a network of collectors and institutions and can track down the best copies from anywhere in the world. I mention this because it has happened before. In the otherwise outstanding Furtwängler complete set, the discs used by Art & Son for the Brahms 1 were in dire condition in complete contrast to the rest of the set.
>
> Dennis H

Thanks for clarifying the above, Dennis. Could you please confirm that the Warner box does not contain his full first recoriding (1938) of both books of Debussy preludes? The amazon image shows that only Book one (minus one prelude) is included. Maybe the booklet explains why?

Thanks,
George

Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?

<dba693e4-4b2d-4501-a330-8bcbf0d85c3an@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=50851&group=rec.music.classical.recordings#50851

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
X-Received: by 2002:a37:b584:0:b0:706:9268:9e7b with SMTP id e126-20020a37b584000000b0070692689e7bmr290976qkf.459.1674072271079;
Wed, 18 Jan 2023 12:04:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6871:89f:b0:15f:1c32:db99 with SMTP id
r31-20020a056871089f00b0015f1c32db99mr755913oaq.266.1674072270832; Wed, 18
Jan 2023 12:04:30 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 12:04:30 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <3c6833b0-1375-495b-9eba-d6729c2440bcn@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2601:249:4200:4b70:fdf2:65f6:a75f:9788;
posting-account=4eVz2AkAAADPSgaKcgujKj0uI1BpyQWj
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2601:249:4200:4b70:fdf2:65f6:a75f:9788
References: <e177e92e-1fe4-49f5-abfa-b94ea1d0b1bbn@googlegroups.com>
<a46c1208-6685-4d54-b66c-0409e988e27fn@googlegroups.com> <0001HW.29397EB501A2F17230B47638F@news.giganews.com>
<d2994882-4fb7-46c2-ad9e-50d47baad636n@googlegroups.com> <0001HW.293D16D501E0747D30AE5E38F@news.giganews.com>
<008c3d69-c7c5-4d99-9421-908cec6ef31bn@googlegroups.com> <3c6833b0-1375-495b-9eba-d6729c2440bcn@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <dba693e4-4b2d-4501-a330-8bcbf0d85c3an@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?
From: drh...@mac.com (drh8h)
Injection-Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 20:04:31 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 by: drh8h - Wed, 18 Jan 2023 20:04 UTC

On Wednesday, January 18, 2023 at 2:14:46 PM UTC-5, George wrote:
> On Wednesday, January 18, 2023 at 8:40:53 AM UTC-5, drh8h wrote:
> > On Sunday, December 4, 2022 at 12:56:43 PM UTC-5, Pluted Pup wrote:
> > > On Sat, 03 Dec 2022 12:48:03 -0800, Invocation wrote:
> > >
> > > > The ringing sound is caused by using poor quality 78s discs.
> > > I don't know what the listeners are saying by "ringing" sound.
> > > Are they just complaining about surface noise? But they say
> > > it is a processing sound and 78 surface noise by itself doesn't
> > > sound like ringing to me.
> > >
> > > This amazon review doesn't say enough, I can't tell what is
> > > being talked about, why is the Liszt Concerto unacceptable,
> > > Presto saying it is from 1936, not from the early 1920's:
> > >
> > > This is an early response based on sampling discs 1, 2, & 6.
> > > Unfortunately there seems to be a fault in the production of
> > > these discs. I'm well aware that these are very old recordings
> > > and are bound to sound poor in comparison to Gieseking's later
> > > recordings, but the issue I'm having both on my computer and on
> > > my hi fi system is a digital ringing at roughly the freqency area
> > > around and above piano middle C. I have made digital transfers of
> > > old material myself and recall this issues as arising from some
> > > lack of synchronisation in the DAC. Unfortunately, I don't have
> > > the knowledge to diagnose the fault precisely. It is, however, a
> > > fault. I've checked other historical recordings on my systems and
> > > my ears, just to be certain that I can isolate it. There is
> > > definitely an issue with this Warner edition. What should I do?
> > > Will Warner recall the discs and replace the faulty ones? Since
> > > I've sampled three discs so far and found the same fault on each
> > > one, I'm not optimistic about the rest.
> > >
> > > UPDATE. I started to listen to disc 3, which has the Liszt First
> > > Piano Concerto. The sound of this is simply unacceptable for an
> > > issue by a major company. There is considerable distortion and
> > > that same digital ringing I noted on other discs. All of this
> > > indicates an unbelievably sloppy job by whoever was employed to
> > > do the transfers and a lack of checking further up the chain. I'm
> > > surprised, because other Warner boxes, e.g. the Barbirolli, have
> > > been excellent. I'm returning the set to Amazon and hope that
> > > Warner will do the decent thing and bring all the discs in the
> > > Gieseking set up to their usual high standard.
> > > >
> > > > On Thursday, December 1, 2022 at 7:30:53 PM UTC-5, Pluted Pup wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, 01 Dec 2022 12:18:04 -0800, Invocation wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Yes, it is pretty obvious. I am wondering if Warner will redo those problematic tracks.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thursday, December 1, 2022 at 1:29:07 AM UTC-5, Jonathan Ben Schragadove wrote:
> > > > > > > Started sampling some of the discs in the new Gieseking boxed set on Warner, and on some of the 1930's tracks I'm wondering if there are issues with the remastering: an annoying ringing tone. There is a review on Amazon that describes this in more detail. Anyone else hearing things?
> > > > > Is the ringing sound from Noise Reduction?
> > I just, finally, received this box yesterday, so haven't listened to much, but sampled some tracks and went through disc 1. Notably, some of the Homocords on that earliest disc are the Seth Winner transfers from the previous outstanding APR issue. I am not sure why they didn't use all of Seth's work. There is not problem with any of "his" tracks. Gieseking completists need to get the APR because it includes the Brunswick recordings. The Mozart "Turkish" excerpt on disc 6 is similarly afflicted with the ringing sound.. I have not the knowledge to know what the problem is, but I am guessing it occurred late in the mastering phase. As for the Liszt Concerto, what is most noticeable to me is the extremely worn condition of the first movement.. I have wondered if Art & Son is limited mostly to whatever Warner has in their archives. Independents like Seth Winner, who had a Gieseking series on Pearl, and Ward Marston, who made a number of Gieseking transfers for Naxos, have access to a network of collectors and institutions and can track down the best copies from anywhere in the world. I mention this because it has happened before. In the otherwise outstanding Furtwängler complete set, the discs used by Art & Son for the Brahms 1 were in dire condition in complete contrast to the rest of the set.
> >
> > Dennis H
> Thanks for clarifying the above, Dennis. Could you please confirm that the Warner box does not contain his full first recoriding (1938) of both books of Debussy preludes? The amazon image shows that only Book one (minus one prelude) is included. Maybe the booklet explains why?
>
> Thanks,
> George

The first book is complete: the "Sunken Cathedral" was recorded earlier. Warner presents the records more or less chronologically. If one bought the "set" in the U. S., there was an empty pocket for that piece, which was sold separately. This is mentioned in one of B. H. Haggin's record books. The second book was recorded by Columbia in NYC and is not in this set, as mentioned in the booklet. The easiest way to obtain it right now is to purchase the 2-CD APR set of WG's prewar Debussy recordings. I did not mention the APR with the Homocords also includes some unpublished sides, Bach C# Maj P&F from Bk 1 of WTC and a couple of Scarlatti sonatas, along with other unpublished recordings. Also it has the two Brunswick sides, which I suppose belong to Universal. These omissions are mentioned in the current Gramophone review by Jed Distler. I have not tried to do the math, but all of the Columbia/Sony records could be pressed onto one or at most two, cds.

Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?

<7277c923-f457-4e71-9e93-1cf0567761c4n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=50852&group=rec.music.classical.recordings#50852

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
X-Received: by 2002:a37:97c6:0:b0:6fe:b9de:2eca with SMTP id z189-20020a3797c6000000b006feb9de2ecamr464212qkd.176.1674072866775;
Wed, 18 Jan 2023 12:14:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:30b3:b0:676:88ac:6d25 with SMTP id
g51-20020a05683030b300b0067688ac6d25mr481801ots.209.1674072866439; Wed, 18
Jan 2023 12:14:26 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 12:14:26 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <dba693e4-4b2d-4501-a330-8bcbf0d85c3an@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=96.224.14.126; posting-account=UrM6gAoAAADicMjz_3BA-a-gnNcHBzY5
NNTP-Posting-Host: 96.224.14.126
References: <e177e92e-1fe4-49f5-abfa-b94ea1d0b1bbn@googlegroups.com>
<a46c1208-6685-4d54-b66c-0409e988e27fn@googlegroups.com> <0001HW.29397EB501A2F17230B47638F@news.giganews.com>
<d2994882-4fb7-46c2-ad9e-50d47baad636n@googlegroups.com> <0001HW.293D16D501E0747D30AE5E38F@news.giganews.com>
<008c3d69-c7c5-4d99-9421-908cec6ef31bn@googlegroups.com> <3c6833b0-1375-495b-9eba-d6729c2440bcn@googlegroups.com>
<dba693e4-4b2d-4501-a330-8bcbf0d85c3an@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <7277c923-f457-4e71-9e93-1cf0567761c4n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?
From: baritone...@gmail.com (George)
Injection-Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 20:14:26 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 8041
 by: George - Wed, 18 Jan 2023 20:14 UTC

On Wednesday, January 18, 2023 at 3:04:33 PM UTC-5, drh8h wrote:
> On Wednesday, January 18, 2023 at 2:14:46 PM UTC-5, George wrote:
> > On Wednesday, January 18, 2023 at 8:40:53 AM UTC-5, drh8h wrote:
> > > On Sunday, December 4, 2022 at 12:56:43 PM UTC-5, Pluted Pup wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 03 Dec 2022 12:48:03 -0800, Invocation wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > The ringing sound is caused by using poor quality 78s discs.
> > > > I don't know what the listeners are saying by "ringing" sound.
> > > > Are they just complaining about surface noise? But they say
> > > > it is a processing sound and 78 surface noise by itself doesn't
> > > > sound like ringing to me.
> > > >
> > > > This amazon review doesn't say enough, I can't tell what is
> > > > being talked about, why is the Liszt Concerto unacceptable,
> > > > Presto saying it is from 1936, not from the early 1920's:
> > > >
> > > > This is an early response based on sampling discs 1, 2, & 6.
> > > > Unfortunately there seems to be a fault in the production of
> > > > these discs. I'm well aware that these are very old recordings
> > > > and are bound to sound poor in comparison to Gieseking's later
> > > > recordings, but the issue I'm having both on my computer and on
> > > > my hi fi system is a digital ringing at roughly the freqency area
> > > > around and above piano middle C. I have made digital transfers of
> > > > old material myself and recall this issues as arising from some
> > > > lack of synchronisation in the DAC. Unfortunately, I don't have
> > > > the knowledge to diagnose the fault precisely. It is, however, a
> > > > fault. I've checked other historical recordings on my systems and
> > > > my ears, just to be certain that I can isolate it. There is
> > > > definitely an issue with this Warner edition. What should I do?
> > > > Will Warner recall the discs and replace the faulty ones? Since
> > > > I've sampled three discs so far and found the same fault on each
> > > > one, I'm not optimistic about the rest.
> > > >
> > > > UPDATE. I started to listen to disc 3, which has the Liszt First
> > > > Piano Concerto. The sound of this is simply unacceptable for an
> > > > issue by a major company. There is considerable distortion and
> > > > that same digital ringing I noted on other discs. All of this
> > > > indicates an unbelievably sloppy job by whoever was employed to
> > > > do the transfers and a lack of checking further up the chain. I'm
> > > > surprised, because other Warner boxes, e.g. the Barbirolli, have
> > > > been excellent. I'm returning the set to Amazon and hope that
> > > > Warner will do the decent thing and bring all the discs in the
> > > > Gieseking set up to their usual high standard.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thursday, December 1, 2022 at 7:30:53 PM UTC-5, Pluted Pup wrote:
> > > > > > On Thu, 01 Dec 2022 12:18:04 -0800, Invocation wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Yes, it is pretty obvious. I am wondering if Warner will redo those problematic tracks.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Thursday, December 1, 2022 at 1:29:07 AM UTC-5, Jonathan Ben Schragadove wrote:
> > > > > > > > Started sampling some of the discs in the new Gieseking boxed set on Warner, and on some of the 1930's tracks I'm wondering if there are issues with the remastering: an annoying ringing tone. There is a review on Amazon that describes this in more detail. Anyone else hearing things?
> > > > > > Is the ringing sound from Noise Reduction?
> > > I just, finally, received this box yesterday, so haven't listened to much, but sampled some tracks and went through disc 1. Notably, some of the Homocords on that earliest disc are the Seth Winner transfers from the previous outstanding APR issue. I am not sure why they didn't use all of Seth's work. There is not problem with any of "his" tracks. Gieseking completists need to get the APR because it includes the Brunswick recordings. The Mozart "Turkish" excerpt on disc 6 is similarly afflicted with the ringing sound. I have not the knowledge to know what the problem is, but I am guessing it occurred late in the mastering phase. As for the Liszt Concerto, what is most noticeable to me is the extremely worn condition of the first movement. I have wondered if Art & Son is limited mostly to whatever Warner has in their archives. Independents like Seth Winner, who had a Gieseking series on Pearl, and Ward Marston, who made a number of Gieseking transfers for Naxos, have access to a network of collectors and institutions and can track down the best copies from anywhere in the world. I mention this because it has happened before. In the otherwise outstanding Furtwängler complete set, the discs used by Art & Son for the Brahms 1 were in dire condition in complete contrast to the rest of the set.
> > >
> > > Dennis H
> > Thanks for clarifying the above, Dennis. Could you please confirm that the Warner box does not contain his full first recoriding (1938) of both books of Debussy preludes? The amazon image shows that only Book one (minus one prelude) is included. Maybe the booklet explains why?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > George
> The first book is complete: the "Sunken Cathedral" was recorded earlier. Warner presents the records more or less chronologically. If one bought the "set" in the U. S., there was an empty pocket for that piece, which was sold separately. This is mentioned in one of B. H. Haggin's record books. The second book was recorded by Columbia in NYC and is not in this set, as mentioned in the booklet. The easiest way to obtain it right now is to purchase the 2-CD APR set of WG's prewar Debussy recordings. I did not mention the APR with the Homocords also includes some unpublished sides, Bach C# Maj P&F from Bk 1 of WTC and a couple of Scarlatti sonatas, along with other unpublished recordings. Also it has the two Brunswick sides, which I suppose belong to Universal. These omissions are mentioned in the current Gramophone review by Jed Distler. I have not tried to do the math, but all of the Columbia/Sony records could be pressed onto one or at most two, cds.

Thanks again, Dennis!

Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?

<f30a8eaa-346a-45df-9a0f-55efa3f7368an@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=50854&group=rec.music.classical.recordings#50854

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:12e9:b0:706:4c71:339b with SMTP id f9-20020a05620a12e900b007064c71339bmr292863qkl.132.1674075567605;
Wed, 18 Jan 2023 12:59:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:2393:b0:364:433f:37dc with SMTP id
bp19-20020a056808239300b00364433f37dcmr460133oib.17.1674075567314; Wed, 18
Jan 2023 12:59:27 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 12:59:27 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <008c3d69-c7c5-4d99-9421-908cec6ef31bn@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2603:8001:b402:268b:61f0:b55e:6893:c68e;
posting-account=1kU88AoAAABiHm0FixoGeB6DAYPpoztB
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2603:8001:b402:268b:61f0:b55e:6893:c68e
References: <e177e92e-1fe4-49f5-abfa-b94ea1d0b1bbn@googlegroups.com>
<a46c1208-6685-4d54-b66c-0409e988e27fn@googlegroups.com> <0001HW.29397EB501A2F17230B47638F@news.giganews.com>
<d2994882-4fb7-46c2-ad9e-50d47baad636n@googlegroups.com> <0001HW.293D16D501E0747D30AE5E38F@news.giganews.com>
<008c3d69-c7c5-4d99-9421-908cec6ef31bn@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <f30a8eaa-346a-45df-9a0f-55efa3f7368an@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?
From: ybschrag...@gmail.com (Jonathan Ben Schragadove)
Injection-Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 20:59:27 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lines: 77
 by: Jonathan Ben Schraga - Wed, 18 Jan 2023 20:59 UTC

On Wednesday, January 18, 2023 at 5:40:53 AM UTC-8, drh8h wrote:
> On Sunday, December 4, 2022 at 12:56:43 PM UTC-5, Pluted Pup wrote:
> > On Sat, 03 Dec 2022 12:48:03 -0800, Invocation wrote:
> >
> > > The ringing sound is caused by using poor quality 78s discs.
> > I don't know what the listeners are saying by "ringing" sound.
> > Are they just complaining about surface noise? But they say
> > it is a processing sound and 78 surface noise by itself doesn't
> > sound like ringing to me.
> >
> > This amazon review doesn't say enough, I can't tell what is
> > being talked about, why is the Liszt Concerto unacceptable,
> > Presto saying it is from 1936, not from the early 1920's:
> >
> > This is an early response based on sampling discs 1, 2, & 6.
> > Unfortunately there seems to be a fault in the production of
> > these discs. I'm well aware that these are very old recordings
> > and are bound to sound poor in comparison to Gieseking's later
> > recordings, but the issue I'm having both on my computer and on
> > my hi fi system is a digital ringing at roughly the freqency area
> > around and above piano middle C. I have made digital transfers of
> > old material myself and recall this issues as arising from some
> > lack of synchronisation in the DAC. Unfortunately, I don't have
> > the knowledge to diagnose the fault precisely. It is, however, a
> > fault. I've checked other historical recordings on my systems and
> > my ears, just to be certain that I can isolate it. There is
> > definitely an issue with this Warner edition. What should I do?
> > Will Warner recall the discs and replace the faulty ones? Since
> > I've sampled three discs so far and found the same fault on each
> > one, I'm not optimistic about the rest.
> >
> > UPDATE. I started to listen to disc 3, which has the Liszt First
> > Piano Concerto. The sound of this is simply unacceptable for an
> > issue by a major company. There is considerable distortion and
> > that same digital ringing I noted on other discs. All of this
> > indicates an unbelievably sloppy job by whoever was employed to
> > do the transfers and a lack of checking further up the chain. I'm
> > surprised, because other Warner boxes, e.g. the Barbirolli, have
> > been excellent. I'm returning the set to Amazon and hope that
> > Warner will do the decent thing and bring all the discs in the
> > Gieseking set up to their usual high standard.
> > >
> > > On Thursday, December 1, 2022 at 7:30:53 PM UTC-5, Pluted Pup wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 01 Dec 2022 12:18:04 -0800, Invocation wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Yes, it is pretty obvious. I am wondering if Warner will redo those problematic tracks.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thursday, December 1, 2022 at 1:29:07 AM UTC-5, Jonathan Ben Schragadove wrote:
> > > > > > Started sampling some of the discs in the new Gieseking boxed set on Warner, and on some of the 1930's tracks I'm wondering if there are issues with the remastering: an annoying ringing tone. There is a review on Amazon that describes this in more detail. Anyone else hearing things?
> > > > Is the ringing sound from Noise Reduction?
> I just, finally, received this box yesterday, so haven't listened to much, but sampled some tracks and went through disc 1. Notably, some of the Homocords on that earliest disc are the Seth Winner transfers from the previous outstanding APR issue. I am not sure why they didn't use all of Seth's work. There is not problem with any of "his" tracks. Gieseking completists need to get the APR because it includes the Brunswick recordings. The Mozart "Turkish" excerpt on disc 6 is similarly afflicted with the ringing sound. I have not the knowledge to know what the problem is, but I am guessing it occurred late in the mastering phase. As for the Liszt Concerto, what is most noticeable to me is the extremely worn condition of the first movement. I have wondered if Art & Son is limited mostly to whatever Warner has in their archives. Independents like Seth Winner, who had a Gieseking series on Pearl, and Ward Marston, who made a number of Gieseking transfers for Naxos, have access to a network of collectors and institutions and can track down the best copies from anywhere in the world. I mention this because it has happened before. In the otherwise outstanding Furtwängler complete set, the discs used by Art & Son for the Brahms 1 were in dire condition in complete contrast to the rest of the set.
>
> Dennis H

Thank you, Dennis.

Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?

<0001HW.2979E7DC0186369D30E4EA38F@news.giganews.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=50884&group=rec.music.classical.recordings#50884

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2023 21:04:28 +0000
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2023 13:04:28 -0800
From: pluted...@outlook.com (Pluted Pup)
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Hogwasher/5.24
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <0001HW.2979E7DC0186369D30E4EA38F@news.giganews.com>
Subject: Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?
Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
References: <e177e92e-1fe4-49f5-abfa-b94ea1d0b1bbn@googlegroups.com> <a46c1208-6685-4d54-b66c-0409e988e27fn@googlegroups.com> <0001HW.29397EB501A2F17230B47638F@news.giganews.com> <d2994882-4fb7-46c2-ad9e-50d47baad636n@googlegroups.com> <0001HW.293D16D501E0747D30AE5E38F@news.giganews.com> <008c3d69-c7c5-4d99-9421-908cec6ef31bn@googlegroups.com>
Lines: 61
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-46eZOnuKKYrmKTwK6Sj/+MYSTmwdvxRG1EVuuJS1VArrL/fkB2UXzXSG7nhw4VP4dO0IGbyYf6ONXVJ!sfvcAhWbqAhtjwgg53n85XE2mjDLDk5ruNbxwkubNhlHPyi2PA5mEB1UeG7xaqyuneIkKLpk49Wh!IZh18Q==
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
 by: Pluted Pup - Thu, 19 Jan 2023 21:04 UTC

On Wed, 18 Jan 2023 05:40:51 -0800, drh8h wrote:

> On Sunday, December 4, 2022 at 12:56:43 PM UTC-5, Pluted Pup wrote:
> > On Sat, 03 Dec 2022 12:48:03 -0800, Invocation wrote:
> >
> > > The ringing sound is caused by using poor quality 78s discs.
> > I don't know what the listeners are saying by "ringing" sound.
> > Are they just complaining about surface noise? But they say
> > it is a processing sound and 78 surface noise by itself doesn't
> > sound like ringing to me.
> >
> > This amazon review doesn't say enough, I can't tell what is
> > being talked about, why is the Liszt Concerto unacceptable,
> > Presto saying it is from 1936, not from the early 1920's:
> >
> > This is an early response based on sampling discs 1, 2, & 6.
> > Unfortunately there seems to be a fault in the production of
> > these discs. I'm well aware that these are very old recordings
> > and are bound to sound poor in comparison to Gieseking's later
> > recordings, but the issue I'm having both on my computer and on
> > my hi fi system is a digital ringing at roughly the freqency area
> > around and above piano middle C. I have made digital transfers of
> > old material myself and recall this issues as arising from some
> > lack of synchronisation in the DAC. Unfortunately, I don't have
> > the knowledge to diagnose the fault precisely. It is, however, a
> > fault. I've checked other historical recordings on my systems and
> > my ears, just to be certain that I can isolate it. There is
> > definitely an issue with this Warner edition. What should I do?
> > Will Warner recall the discs and replace the faulty ones? Since
> > I've sampled three discs so far and found the same fault on each
> > one, I'm not optimistic about the rest.
> >
> > UPDATE. I started to listen to disc 3, which has the Liszt First
> > Piano Concerto. The sound of this is simply unacceptable for an
> > issue by a major company. There is considerable distortion and
> > that same digital ringing I noted on other discs. All of this
> > indicates an unbelievably sloppy job by whoever was employed to
> > do the transfers and a lack of checking further up the chain. I'm
> > surprised, because other Warner boxes, e.g. the Barbirolli, have
> > been excellent. I'm returning the set to Amazon and hope that
> > Warner will do the decent thing and bring all the discs in the
> > Gieseking set up to their usual high standard.
> > >
> > > On Thursday, December 1, 2022 at 7:30:53 PM UTC-5, Pluted Pup wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 01 Dec 2022 12:18:04 -0800, Invocation wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Yes, it is pretty obvious. I am wondering if Warner will redo those problematic tracks.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thursday, December 1, 2022 at 1:29:07 AM UTC-5, Jonathan Ben Schragadove wrote:
> > > > > > Started sampling some of the discs in the new Gieseking boxed set on Warner, and on some of the 1930's tracks I'm wondering if there are issues with the remastering: an annoying ringing tone. There is a review on Amazon that describes this in more detail. Anyone else hearing things?
> > > > Is the ringing sound from Noise Reduction?
>
> I just, finally, received this box yesterday, so haven't listened to much, but sampled some tracks and went through disc 1. Notably, some of the Homocords on that earliest disc are the Seth Winner transfers from the previous outstanding APR issue. I am not sure why they didn't use all of Seth's work. There is not problem with any of "his" tracks. Gieseking completists need to get the APR because it includes the Brunswick recordings. The Mozart "Turkish" excerpt on disc 6 is similarly afflicted with the ringing sound. I have not the knowledge to know what the problem is, but I am guessing it occurred late in the mastering phase. As for the Liszt Concerto, what is most noticeable to me is the extremely worn condition of the first movement. I have wondered if Art & Son is limited mostly to whatever Warner has in their archives. Independents like Seth Winner, who had a Gieseking series on Pearl, and Ward Marston, who made a number of Gieseking transfers for Naxos, have access to a
> network of collectors and institutions and can track down the best copies from anywhere in the world. I mention this because it has happened before. In the otherwise outstanding Furtwängler complete set, the discs used by Art & Son for the Brahms 1 were in dire condition in complete contrast to the rest of the set.

Can you describe the "ringing"? Is it surface noise, is it
noise reduction? Noise reduction can have a whiny sound.

I far prefer surface noise to noise reduction artifacts.

Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?

<af315799-ddc5-42c1-b405-07e2412917b8n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=50891&group=rec.music.classical.recordings#50891

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:2b44:b0:535:1bb4:e731 with SMTP id jy4-20020a0562142b4400b005351bb4e731mr546594qvb.3.1674178380435;
Thu, 19 Jan 2023 17:33:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:a706:b0:15f:87c4:7838 with SMTP id
g6-20020a056870a70600b0015f87c47838mr627845oam.51.1674178379958; Thu, 19 Jan
2023 17:32:59 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2023 17:32:59 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <0001HW.2979E7DC0186369D30E4EA38F@news.giganews.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2601:249:4200:4b70:5809:3327:6a0f:8f49;
posting-account=4eVz2AkAAADPSgaKcgujKj0uI1BpyQWj
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2601:249:4200:4b70:5809:3327:6a0f:8f49
References: <e177e92e-1fe4-49f5-abfa-b94ea1d0b1bbn@googlegroups.com>
<a46c1208-6685-4d54-b66c-0409e988e27fn@googlegroups.com> <0001HW.29397EB501A2F17230B47638F@news.giganews.com>
<d2994882-4fb7-46c2-ad9e-50d47baad636n@googlegroups.com> <0001HW.293D16D501E0747D30AE5E38F@news.giganews.com>
<008c3d69-c7c5-4d99-9421-908cec6ef31bn@googlegroups.com> <0001HW.2979E7DC0186369D30E4EA38F@news.giganews.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <af315799-ddc5-42c1-b405-07e2412917b8n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?
From: drh...@mac.com (drh8h)
Injection-Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2023 01:33:00 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 7862
 by: drh8h - Fri, 20 Jan 2023 01:32 UTC

On Thursday, January 19, 2023 at 4:04:35 PM UTC-5, Pluted Pup wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jan 2023 05:40:51 -0800, drh8h wrote:
>
> > On Sunday, December 4, 2022 at 12:56:43 PM UTC-5, Pluted Pup wrote:
> > > On Sat, 03 Dec 2022 12:48:03 -0800, Invocation wrote:
> > >
> > > > The ringing sound is caused by using poor quality 78s discs.
> > > I don't know what the listeners are saying by "ringing" sound.
> > > Are they just complaining about surface noise? But they say
> > > it is a processing sound and 78 surface noise by itself doesn't
> > > sound like ringing to me.
> > >
> > > This amazon review doesn't say enough, I can't tell what is
> > > being talked about, why is the Liszt Concerto unacceptable,
> > > Presto saying it is from 1936, not from the early 1920's:
> > >
> > > This is an early response based on sampling discs 1, 2, & 6.
> > > Unfortunately there seems to be a fault in the production of
> > > these discs. I'm well aware that these are very old recordings
> > > and are bound to sound poor in comparison to Gieseking's later
> > > recordings, but the issue I'm having both on my computer and on
> > > my hi fi system is a digital ringing at roughly the freqency area
> > > around and above piano middle C. I have made digital transfers of
> > > old material myself and recall this issues as arising from some
> > > lack of synchronisation in the DAC. Unfortunately, I don't have
> > > the knowledge to diagnose the fault precisely. It is, however, a
> > > fault. I've checked other historical recordings on my systems and
> > > my ears, just to be certain that I can isolate it. There is
> > > definitely an issue with this Warner edition. What should I do?
> > > Will Warner recall the discs and replace the faulty ones? Since
> > > I've sampled three discs so far and found the same fault on each
> > > one, I'm not optimistic about the rest.
> > >
> > > UPDATE. I started to listen to disc 3, which has the Liszt First
> > > Piano Concerto. The sound of this is simply unacceptable for an
> > > issue by a major company. There is considerable distortion and
> > > that same digital ringing I noted on other discs. All of this
> > > indicates an unbelievably sloppy job by whoever was employed to
> > > do the transfers and a lack of checking further up the chain. I'm
> > > surprised, because other Warner boxes, e.g. the Barbirolli, have
> > > been excellent. I'm returning the set to Amazon and hope that
> > > Warner will do the decent thing and bring all the discs in the
> > > Gieseking set up to their usual high standard.
> > > >
> > > > On Thursday, December 1, 2022 at 7:30:53 PM UTC-5, Pluted Pup wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, 01 Dec 2022 12:18:04 -0800, Invocation wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Yes, it is pretty obvious. I am wondering if Warner will redo those problematic tracks.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thursday, December 1, 2022 at 1:29:07 AM UTC-5, Jonathan Ben Schragadove wrote:
> > > > > > > Started sampling some of the discs in the new Gieseking boxed set on Warner, and on some of the 1930's tracks I'm wondering if there are issues with the remastering: an annoying ringing tone. There is a review on Amazon that describes this in more detail. Anyone else hearing things?
> > > > > Is the ringing sound from Noise Reduction?
> >
> > I just, finally, received this box yesterday, so haven't listened to much, but sampled some tracks and went through disc 1. Notably, some of the Homocords on that earliest disc are the Seth Winner transfers from the previous outstanding APR issue. I am not sure why they didn't use all of Seth's work. There is not problem with any of "his" tracks. Gieseking completists need to get the APR because it includes the Brunswick recordings. The Mozart "Turkish" excerpt on disc 6 is similarly afflicted with the ringing sound.. I have not the knowledge to know what the problem is, but I am guessing it occurred late in the mastering phase. As for the Liszt Concerto, what is most noticeable to me is the extremely worn condition of the first movement.. I have wondered if Art & Son is limited mostly to whatever Warner has in their archives. Independents like Seth Winner, who had a Gieseking series on Pearl, and Ward Marston, who made a number of Gieseking transfers for Naxos, have access to a
> > network of collectors and institutions and can track down the best copies from anywhere in the world. I mention this because it has happened before. In the otherwise outstanding Furtwängler complete set, the discs used by Art & Son for the Brahms 1 were in dire condition in complete contrast to the rest of the set.
> Can you describe the "ringing"? Is it surface noise, is it
> noise reduction? Noise reduction can have a whiny sound.
>
> I far prefer surface noise to noise reduction artifacts.

To me it sounds like a metallic resonance. You might think your tweeter was damaged or a piece of metal vibrating. Such noises are not uncommon on distorting or worn piano recordings, but this is subtly different, higher pitched and rather disembodied from the musical sound. I am still working my way through the discs, so can't say how much is afflicted. Never throughout an entire disc, and only certain short pieces. So far, the concertos, except the worn out parts of the Liszt, and sonatas are fine. The "Emperor" presumably from master pressings, is outstandingly good. The Turkish excerpt I mentioned is really disc 5. Can't see! Items with flute, also on APR, are affected, mostly in the flute passages. Probably less than an hour's worth notably afflicted so far, but I have a way to go through the 78s. I am listening on Amphion speakers and they have a very strong treble "presence." Other models or headphones or higher listening levels than my lease permit might yield different results, maybe less so with a treble rolloff. Surface noise is strong on some tracks. Art & Son usually don't overdo the noise reduction. We need a technical expert to weigh in.

DH

Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?

<0001HW.297C7BE101AD5F76309A1138F@news.giganews.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=50960&group=rec.music.classical.recordings#50960

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!69.80.99.22.MISMATCH!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2023 20:00:33 +0000
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2023 12:00:33 -0800
From: pluted...@outlook.com (Pluted Pup)
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Hogwasher/5.24
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <0001HW.297C7BE101AD5F76309A1138F@news.giganews.com>
Subject: Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?
Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
References: <e177e92e-1fe4-49f5-abfa-b94ea1d0b1bbn@googlegroups.com> <a46c1208-6685-4d54-b66c-0409e988e27fn@googlegroups.com> <0001HW.29397EB501A2F17230B47638F@news.giganews.com> <d2994882-4fb7-46c2-ad9e-50d47baad636n@googlegroups.com> <0001HW.293D16D501E0747D30AE5E38F@news.giganews.com> <008c3d69-c7c5-4d99-9421-908cec6ef31bn@googlegroups.com> <0001HW.2979E7DC0186369D30E4EA38F@news.giganews.com> <af315799-ddc5-42c1-b405-07e2412917b8n@googlegroups.com>
Lines: 87
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-yS6q0qyM+At6Wdd+ou8SR/qy2ezwA4IovxJj6oXjXPV47v6XgYyplcEVUZLV7IwcSxfqhPM/K9sPBN6!x0nebGrciUAsaewSgXPO4cYxmFqTiU/jzjGAP+O+ov0G6yLdnjFTNC8BpMEwsQDBgF1pTcM4oSry!qnDBbw==
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Received-Bytes: 8449
 by: Pluted Pup - Sat, 21 Jan 2023 20:00 UTC

On Thu, 19 Jan 2023 17:32:59 -0800, drh8h wrote:

> On Thursday, January 19, 2023 at 4:04:35 PM UTC-5, Pluted Pup wrote:
> > On Wed, 18 Jan 2023 05:40:51 -0800, drh8h wrote:
> >
> > > On Sunday, December 4, 2022 at 12:56:43 PM UTC-5, Pluted Pup wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 03 Dec 2022 12:48:03 -0800, Invocation wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > The ringing sound is caused by using poor quality 78s discs.
> > > > I don't know what the listeners are saying by "ringing" sound.
> > > > Are they just complaining about surface noise? But they say
> > > > it is a processing sound and 78 surface noise by itself doesn't
> > > > sound like ringing to me.
> > > >
> > > > This amazon review doesn't say enough, I can't tell what is
> > > > being talked about, why is the Liszt Concerto unacceptable,
> > > > Presto saying it is from 1936, not from the early 1920's:
> > > >
> > > > This is an early response based on sampling discs 1, 2, & 6.
> > > > Unfortunately there seems to be a fault in the production of
> > > > these discs. I'm well aware that these are very old recordings
> > > > and are bound to sound poor in comparison to Gieseking's later
> > > > recordings, but the issue I'm having both on my computer and on
> > > > my hi fi system is a digital ringing at roughly the freqency area
> > > > around and above piano middle C. I have made digital transfers of
> > > > old material myself and recall this issues as arising from some
> > > > lack of synchronisation in the DAC. Unfortunately, I don't have
> > > > the knowledge to diagnose the fault precisely. It is, however, a
> > > > fault. I've checked other historical recordings on my systems and
> > > > my ears, just to be certain that I can isolate it. There is
> > > > definitely an issue with this Warner edition. What should I do?
> > > > Will Warner recall the discs and replace the faulty ones? Since
> > > > I've sampled three discs so far and found the same fault on each
> > > > one, I'm not optimistic about the rest.
> > > >
> > > > UPDATE. I started to listen to disc 3, which has the Liszt First
> > > > Piano Concerto. The sound of this is simply unacceptable for an
> > > > issue by a major company. There is considerable distortion and
> > > > that same digital ringing I noted on other discs. All of this
> > > > indicates an unbelievably sloppy job by whoever was employed to
> > > > do the transfers and a lack of checking further up the chain. I'm
> > > > surprised, because other Warner boxes, e.g. the Barbirolli, have
> > > > been excellent. I'm returning the set to Amazon and hope that
> > > > Warner will do the decent thing and bring all the discs in the
> > > > Gieseking set up to their usual high standard.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thursday, December 1, 2022 at 7:30:53 PM UTC-5, Pluted Pup wrote:
> > > > > > On Thu, 01 Dec 2022 12:18:04 -0800, Invocation wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Yes, it is pretty obvious. I am wondering if Warner will redo those problematic tracks.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Thursday, December 1, 2022 at 1:29:07 AM UTC-5, Jonathan Ben Schragadove wrote:
> > > > > > > > Started sampling some of the discs in the new Gieseking boxed set on Warner, and on some of the 1930's tracks I'm wondering if there are issues with the remastering: an annoying ringing tone. There is a review on Amazon that describes this in more detail. Anyone else hearing things?
> > > > > > Is the ringing sound from Noise Reduction?
> > >
> > > I just, finally, received this box yesterday, so haven't listened to much, but sampled some tracks and went through disc 1. Notably, some of the Homocords on that earliest disc are the Seth Winner transfers from the previous outstanding APR issue. I am not sure why they didn't use all of Seth's work. There is not problem with any of "his" tracks. Gieseking completists need to get the APR because it includes the Brunswick recordings. The Mozart "Turkish" excerpt on disc 6 is similarly afflicted with the ringing sound. I have not the knowledge to know what the problem is, but I am guessing it occurred late in the mastering phase. As for the Liszt Concerto, what is most noticeable to me is the extremely worn condition of the first movement. I have wondered if Art & Son is limited mostly to whatever Warner has in their archives. Independents like Seth Winner, who had a Gieseking series on Pearl, and Ward Marston, who made a number of Gieseking transfers for Naxos, have access to
a > > > network of collectors and institutions and can track down the best copies from anywhere in the world. I mention this because it has happened before. In the otherwise outstanding Furtwängler complete set, the discs used by Art & Son for the Brahms 1 were in dire condition in complete contrast to the rest of the set.
> > Can you describe the "ringing"? Is it surface noise, is it
> > noise reduction? Noise reduction can have a whiny sound.
> >
> > I far prefer surface noise to noise reduction artifacts.
>
> To me it sounds like a metallic resonance. You might think your tweeter was damaged or a piece of metal vibrating. Such noises are not uncommon on distorting or worn piano recordings, but this is subtly different, higher pitched and rather disembodied from the musical sound. I am still working my way through the discs, so can't say how much is afflicted. Never throughout an entire disc, and only certain short pieces. So far, the concertos, except the worn out parts of the Liszt, and sonatas are fine. The "Emperor" presumably from master pressings, is outstandingly good. The Turkish excerpt I mentioned is really disc 5. Can't see! Items with flute, also on APR, are affected, mostly in the flute passages. Probably less than an hour's worth notably afflicted so far, but I have a way to go through the 78s. I am listening on Amphion speakers and they have a very strong treble "presence." Other models or headphones or higher listening levels than my lease permit might yield different
> results, maybe less so with a treble rolloff. Surface noise is strong on some tracks.

Anyway, I bought the set. I predict I'll describe it as "that does
sound like ringing but it's hard to describe".

> Art & Son usually don't overdo the noise reduction.

You can't go by names: Is Sony's Meyer or b-sharp good?
They did a terrible job on Richter's 1960 Columbia live
recordings. Is Ward Marston good? Sony placed his name
on the terrible engineering of the Complete Rachmaninoff set.
Is Keith Hardwick good? EMI placed his name on the 1990
Schnabel set. All three sets and engineering were severely
muffled by noise reduction.

> We need a technical expert to weigh in.

We don't need the type of experts who always apologizes for
intrusive engineering. We need the types who analyzes and
explains.

(Sorry for the TD derangement syndrome)

Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?

<471fc302-8b8b-4d0d-ad4e-8477be963a24n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=50965&group=rec.music.classical.recordings#50965

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:6712:0:b0:3a9:89ac:3d32 with SMTP id e18-20020ac86712000000b003a989ac3d32mr486702qtp.518.1674345935437;
Sat, 21 Jan 2023 16:05:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:14ca:b0:36d:1391:1e23 with SMTP id
f10-20020a05680814ca00b0036d13911e23mr839670oiw.121.1674345935195; Sat, 21
Jan 2023 16:05:35 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2023 16:05:34 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <0001HW.297C7BE101AD5F76309A1138F@news.giganews.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2601:249:4200:4b70:4886:2d7:9219:c7b5;
posting-account=4eVz2AkAAADPSgaKcgujKj0uI1BpyQWj
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2601:249:4200:4b70:4886:2d7:9219:c7b5
References: <e177e92e-1fe4-49f5-abfa-b94ea1d0b1bbn@googlegroups.com>
<a46c1208-6685-4d54-b66c-0409e988e27fn@googlegroups.com> <0001HW.29397EB501A2F17230B47638F@news.giganews.com>
<d2994882-4fb7-46c2-ad9e-50d47baad636n@googlegroups.com> <0001HW.293D16D501E0747D30AE5E38F@news.giganews.com>
<008c3d69-c7c5-4d99-9421-908cec6ef31bn@googlegroups.com> <0001HW.2979E7DC0186369D30E4EA38F@news.giganews.com>
<af315799-ddc5-42c1-b405-07e2412917b8n@googlegroups.com> <0001HW.297C7BE101AD5F76309A1138F@news.giganews.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <471fc302-8b8b-4d0d-ad4e-8477be963a24n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?
From: drh...@mac.com (drh8h)
Injection-Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2023 00:05:35 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 9967
 by: drh8h - Sun, 22 Jan 2023 00:05 UTC

On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 3:00:42 PM UTC-5, Pluted Pup wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Jan 2023 17:32:59 -0800, drh8h wrote:
>
> > On Thursday, January 19, 2023 at 4:04:35 PM UTC-5, Pluted Pup wrote:
> > > On Wed, 18 Jan 2023 05:40:51 -0800, drh8h wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Sunday, December 4, 2022 at 12:56:43 PM UTC-5, Pluted Pup wrote:
> > > > > On Sat, 03 Dec 2022 12:48:03 -0800, Invocation wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > The ringing sound is caused by using poor quality 78s discs.
> > > > > I don't know what the listeners are saying by "ringing" sound.
> > > > > Are they just complaining about surface noise? But they say
> > > > > it is a processing sound and 78 surface noise by itself doesn't
> > > > > sound like ringing to me.
> > > > >
> > > > > This amazon review doesn't say enough, I can't tell what is
> > > > > being talked about, why is the Liszt Concerto unacceptable,
> > > > > Presto saying it is from 1936, not from the early 1920's:
> > > > >
> > > > > This is an early response based on sampling discs 1, 2, & 6.
> > > > > Unfortunately there seems to be a fault in the production of
> > > > > these discs. I'm well aware that these are very old recordings
> > > > > and are bound to sound poor in comparison to Gieseking's later
> > > > > recordings, but the issue I'm having both on my computer and on
> > > > > my hi fi system is a digital ringing at roughly the freqency area
> > > > > around and above piano middle C. I have made digital transfers of
> > > > > old material myself and recall this issues as arising from some
> > > > > lack of synchronisation in the DAC. Unfortunately, I don't have
> > > > > the knowledge to diagnose the fault precisely. It is, however, a
> > > > > fault. I've checked other historical recordings on my systems and
> > > > > my ears, just to be certain that I can isolate it. There is
> > > > > definitely an issue with this Warner edition. What should I do?
> > > > > Will Warner recall the discs and replace the faulty ones? Since
> > > > > I've sampled three discs so far and found the same fault on each
> > > > > one, I'm not optimistic about the rest.
> > > > >
> > > > > UPDATE. I started to listen to disc 3, which has the Liszt First
> > > > > Piano Concerto. The sound of this is simply unacceptable for an
> > > > > issue by a major company. There is considerable distortion and
> > > > > that same digital ringing I noted on other discs. All of this
> > > > > indicates an unbelievably sloppy job by whoever was employed to
> > > > > do the transfers and a lack of checking further up the chain. I'm
> > > > > surprised, because other Warner boxes, e.g. the Barbirolli, have
> > > > > been excellent. I'm returning the set to Amazon and hope that
> > > > > Warner will do the decent thing and bring all the discs in the
> > > > > Gieseking set up to their usual high standard.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thursday, December 1, 2022 at 7:30:53 PM UTC-5, Pluted Pup wrote:
> > > > > > > On Thu, 01 Dec 2022 12:18:04 -0800, Invocation wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Yes, it is pretty obvious. I am wondering if Warner will redo those problematic tracks.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Thursday, December 1, 2022 at 1:29:07 AM UTC-5, Jonathan Ben Schragadove wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Started sampling some of the discs in the new Gieseking boxed set on Warner, and on some of the 1930's tracks I'm wondering if there are issues with the remastering: an annoying ringing tone. There is a review on Amazon that describes this in more detail. Anyone else hearing things?
> > > > > > > Is the ringing sound from Noise Reduction?
> > > >
> > > > I just, finally, received this box yesterday, so haven't listened to much, but sampled some tracks and went through disc 1. Notably, some of the Homocords on that earliest disc are the Seth Winner transfers from the previous outstanding APR issue. I am not sure why they didn't use all of Seth's work. There is not problem with any of "his" tracks. Gieseking completists need to get the APR because it includes the Brunswick recordings. The Mozart "Turkish" excerpt on disc 6 is similarly afflicted with the ringing sound. I have not the knowledge to know what the problem is, but I am guessing it occurred late in the mastering phase. As for the Liszt Concerto, what is most noticeable to me is the extremely worn condition of the first movement. I have wondered if Art & Son is limited mostly to whatever Warner has in their archives. Independents like Seth Winner, who had a Gieseking series on Pearl, and Ward Marston, who made a number of Gieseking transfers for Naxos, have access to
> a
> > > > network of collectors and institutions and can track down the best copies from anywhere in the world. I mention this because it has happened before. In the otherwise outstanding Furtwängler complete set, the discs used by Art & Son for the Brahms 1 were in dire condition in complete contrast to the rest of the set.
> > > Can you describe the "ringing"? Is it surface noise, is it
> > > noise reduction? Noise reduction can have a whiny sound.
> > >
> > > I far prefer surface noise to noise reduction artifacts.
> >
> > To me it sounds like a metallic resonance. You might think your tweeter was damaged or a piece of metal vibrating. Such noises are not uncommon on distorting or worn piano recordings, but this is subtly different, higher pitched and rather disembodied from the musical sound. I am still working my way through the discs, so can't say how much is afflicted. Never throughout an entire disc, and only certain short pieces. So far, the concertos, except the worn out parts of the Liszt, and sonatas are fine. The "Emperor" presumably from master pressings, is outstandingly good. The Turkish excerpt I mentioned is really disc 5. Can't see! Items with flute, also on APR, are affected, mostly in the flute passages. Probably less than an hour's worth notably afflicted so far, but I have a way to go through the 78s. I am listening on Amphion speakers and they have a very strong treble "presence." Other models or headphones or higher listening levels than my lease permit might yield different
> > results, maybe less so with a treble rolloff. Surface noise is strong on some tracks.
> Anyway, I bought the set. I predict I'll describe it as "that does
> sound like ringing but it's hard to describe".
> > Art & Son usually don't overdo the noise reduction.
> You can't go by names: Is Sony's Meyer or b-sharp good?
> They did a terrible job on Richter's 1960 Columbia live
> recordings. Is Ward Marston good? Sony placed his name
> on the terrible engineering of the Complete Rachmaninoff set.
> Is Keith Hardwick good? EMI placed his name on the 1990
> Schnabel set. All three sets and engineering were severely
> muffled by noise reduction.
> > We need a technical expert to weigh in.
> We don't need the type of experts who always apologizes for
> intrusive engineering. We need the types who analyzes and
> explains.
>
> (Sorry for the TD derangement syndrome)

Lordy, Ward's Rachmaninoff set for RCA was thirty years ago. Reports are RCA messed with it. If you haven't heard his other work, including an ongoing Rach (one cd to go) for Naxos, you are missing a lot of the best. The Sony crowd is mostly good. They have had a few misses but acceptable, and sometimes better, esp. with lacquer-based Columbias. Keith Hardwick died years, maybe a couple decades, ago. That Schnabel set is even older than the RCA. I don't think Keith had anything to do with EMI's noise reduction during the cd era. When he retired and started working for Testament and Pearl, the surface noise reassuringly returned. As for experts, I surely am not one, and if you gathered them all in a room, I doubt there would much agreement even about the weather.

DH

Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?

<0001HW.2983631F021E1651306ADF38F@news.giganews.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=51363&group=rec.music.classical.recordings#51363

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!69.80.99.27.MISMATCH!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 01:40:47 +0000
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2023 17:40:47 -0800
From: pluted...@outlook.com (Pluted Pup)
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Hogwasher/5.24
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <0001HW.2983631F021E1651306ADF38F@news.giganews.com>
Subject: Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?
Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
References: <e177e92e-1fe4-49f5-abfa-b94ea1d0b1bbn@googlegroups.com> <a46c1208-6685-4d54-b66c-0409e988e27fn@googlegroups.com> <0001HW.29397EB501A2F17230B47638F@news.giganews.com> <d2994882-4fb7-46c2-ad9e-50d47baad636n@googlegroups.com> <0001HW.293D16D501E0747D30AE5E38F@news.giganews.com> <008c3d69-c7c5-4d99-9421-908cec6ef31bn@googlegroups.com> <0001HW.2979E7DC0186369D30E4EA38F@news.giganews.com> <af315799-ddc5-42c1-b405-07e2412917b8n@googlegroups.com> <0001HW.297C7BE101AD5F76309A1138F@news.giganews.com>
Lines: 81
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-1To1z9l6rFxRc/gvI9M2XIv+UaHpxDytCxMnrvHl8oplxoEv895U7jFTBlvk8P8urRUrep2grRwwWbD!9MkurPyyQYDp3hkUMeV61nVAItEw719SVv0GduSNmRdq4Sbu8MEq5XmQShnkJ7J+g+iH3kOnkIC8!BGYyMA==
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Received-Bytes: 8431
 by: Pluted Pup - Fri, 27 Jan 2023 01:40 UTC

On Sat, 21 Jan 2023 12:00:33 -0800, Pluted Pup wrote:

> On Thu, 19 Jan 2023 17:32:59 -0800, drh8h wrote:
>
> > On Thursday, January 19, 2023 at 4:04:35 PM UTC-5, Pluted Pup wrote:
> > > On Wed, 18 Jan 2023 05:40:51 -0800, drh8h wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Sunday, December 4, 2022 at 12:56:43 PM UTC-5, Pluted Pup wrote:
> > > > > On Sat, 03 Dec 2022 12:48:03 -0800, Invocation wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > The ringing sound is caused by using poor quality 78s discs.
> > > > > I don't know what the listeners are saying by "ringing" sound.
> > > > > Are they just complaining about surface noise? But they say
> > > > > it is a processing sound and 78 surface noise by itself doesn't
> > > > > sound like ringing to me.
> > > > >
> > > > > This amazon review doesn't say enough, I can't tell what is
> > > > > being talked about, why is the Liszt Concerto unacceptable,
> > > > > Presto saying it is from 1936, not from the early 1920's:
> > > > >
> > > > > This is an early response based on sampling discs 1, 2, & 6.
> > > > > Unfortunately there seems to be a fault in the production of
> > > > > these discs. I'm well aware that these are very old recordings
> > > > > and are bound to sound poor in comparison to Gieseking's later
> > > > > recordings, but the issue I'm having both on my computer and on
> > > > > my hi fi system is a digital ringing at roughly the freqency area
> > > > > around and above piano middle C. I have made digital transfers of
> > > > > old material myself and recall this issues as arising from some
> > > > > lack of synchronisation in the DAC. Unfortunately, I don't have
> > > > > the knowledge to diagnose the fault precisely. It is, however, a
> > > > > fault. I've checked other historical recordings on my systems and
> > > > > my ears, just to be certain that I can isolate it. There is
> > > > > definitely an issue with this Warner edition. What should I do?
> > > > > Will Warner recall the discs and replace the faulty ones? Since
> > > > > I've sampled three discs so far and found the same fault on each
> > > > > one, I'm not optimistic about the rest.
> > > > >
> > > > > UPDATE. I started to listen to disc 3, which has the Liszt First
> > > > > Piano Concerto. The sound of this is simply unacceptable for an
> > > > > issue by a major company. There is considerable distortion and
> > > > > that same digital ringing I noted on other discs. All of this
> > > > > indicates an unbelievably sloppy job by whoever was employed to
> > > > > do the transfers and a lack of checking further up the chain. I'm
> > > > > surprised, because other Warner boxes, e.g. the Barbirolli, have
> > > > > been excellent. I'm returning the set to Amazon and hope that
> > > > > Warner will do the decent thing and bring all the discs in the
> > > > > Gieseking set up to their usual high standard.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thursday, December 1, 2022 at 7:30:53 PM UTC-5, Pluted Pup wrote:
> > > > > > > On Thu, 01 Dec 2022 12:18:04 -0800, Invocation wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Yes, it is pretty obvious. I am wondering if Warner will redo those problematic tracks.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Thursday, December 1, 2022 at 1:29:07 AM UTC-5, Jonathan Ben Schragadove wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Started sampling some of the discs in the new Gieseking boxed set on Warner, and on some of the 1930's tracks I'm wondering if there are issues with the remastering: an annoying ringing tone. There is a review on Amazon that describes this in more detail. Anyone else hearing things?
> > > > > > > Is the ringing sound from Noise Reduction?
> > > >
> > > > I just, finally, received this box yesterday, so haven't listened to much, but sampled some tracks and went through disc 1. Notably, some of the Homocords on that earliest disc are the Seth Winner transfers from the previous outstanding APR issue. I am not sure why they didn't use all of Seth's work. There is not problem with any of "his" tracks. Gieseking completists need to get the APR because it includes the Brunswick recordings. The Mozart "Turkish" excerpt on disc 6 is similarly afflicted with the ringing sound. I have not the knowledge to know what the problem is, but I am guessing it occurred late in the mastering phase. As for the Liszt Concerto, what is most noticeable to me is the extremely worn condition of the first movement. I have wondered if Art & Son is limited mostly to whatever Warner has in their archives. Independents like Seth Winner, who had a Gieseking series on Pearl, and Ward Marston, who made a number of Gieseking transfers for Naxos, have access
to
> a
> > > > network of collectors and institutions and can track down the best copies from anywhere in the world. I mention this because it has happened before. In the otherwise outstanding Furtwängler complete set, the discs used by Art & Son for the Brahms 1 were in dire condition in complete contrast to the rest of the set.
> > > Can you describe the "ringing"? Is it surface noise, is it
> > > noise reduction? Noise reduction can have a whiny sound.
> > >
> > > I far prefer surface noise to noise reduction artifacts.
> >
> > To me it sounds like a metallic resonance. You might think your tweeter was damaged or a piece of metal vibrating. Such noises are not uncommon on distorting or worn piano recordings, but this is subtly different, higher pitched and rather disembodied from the musical sound. I am still working my way through the discs, so can't say how much is afflicted. Never throughout an entire disc, and only certain short pieces. So far, the concertos, except the worn out parts of the Liszt, and sonatas are fine. The "Emperor" presumably from master pressings, is outstandingly good. The Turkish excerpt I mentioned is really disc 5. Can't see! Items with flute, also on APR, are affected, mostly in the flute passages. Probably less than an hour's worth notably afflicted so far, but I have a way to go through the 78s. I am listening on Amphion speakers and they have a very strong treble "presence." Other models or headphones or higher listening levels than my lease permit might yield different
> > results, maybe less so with a treble rolloff. Surface noise is strong on some tracks.
>
> Anyway, I bought the set. I predict I'll describe it as "that does
> sound like ringing but it's hard to describe".

I listened to the first 3 CDs. It sounds like ringing on a few
tracks, it is not steady but only during loud notes. It's the
worst with the beginning of the second CD with the Grieg Lyric
pieces. With the ringing only on loud notes it resembles the
sound of players with lousy speakers that are worn out or
underpowered, like some boom boxes I've tried to use playing
piano music CDs.

Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?

<0001HW.29836A3A021FC082306ADF38F@news.giganews.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=51364&group=rec.music.classical.recordings#51364

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 02:11:05 +0000
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2023 18:11:06 -0800
From: pluted...@outlook.com (Pluted Pup)
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Hogwasher/5.24
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <0001HW.29836A3A021FC082306ADF38F@news.giganews.com>
Subject: Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?
Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
References: <e177e92e-1fe4-49f5-abfa-b94ea1d0b1bbn@googlegroups.com> <a46c1208-6685-4d54-b66c-0409e988e27fn@googlegroups.com> <0001HW.29397EB501A2F17230B47638F@news.giganews.com> <d2994882-4fb7-46c2-ad9e-50d47baad636n@googlegroups.com> <0001HW.293D16D501E0747D30AE5E38F@news.giganews.com> <008c3d69-c7c5-4d99-9421-908cec6ef31bn@googlegroups.com> <0001HW.2979E7DC0186369D30E4EA38F@news.giganews.com> <af315799-ddc5-42c1-b405-07e2412917b8n@googlegroups.com> <0001HW.297C7BE101AD5F76309A1138F@news.giganews.com> <471fc302-8b8b-4d0d-ad4e-8477be963a24n@googlegroups.com>
Lines: 118
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-fMHl3M7CcuatKS1i4hSTwk2noABRSLMAvHSSuYCD3n5uJnZH7PtrGuk1WxvlErLseoN3QeziefwK9Iz!eLDgegU+DnEKOFnaBDTT23GHTt5YdlalfrvLzw/7sxlWlsjagn4WXeEU8jtijyIYXp+Q0jrbrhot!gLrHDw==
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
 by: Pluted Pup - Fri, 27 Jan 2023 02:11 UTC

On Sat, 21 Jan 2023 16:05:34 -0800, drh8h wrote:

> On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 3:00:42 PM UTC-5, Pluted Pup wrote:
> > On Thu, 19 Jan 2023 17:32:59 -0800, drh8h wrote:
> >
> > > On Thursday, January 19, 2023 at 4:04:35 PM UTC-5, Pluted Pup wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 18 Jan 2023 05:40:51 -0800, drh8h wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Sunday, December 4, 2022 at 12:56:43 PM UTC-5, Pluted Pup wrote:
> > > > > > On Sat, 03 Dec 2022 12:48:03 -0800, Invocation wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > The ringing sound is caused by using poor quality 78s discs.
> > > > > > I don't know what the listeners are saying by "ringing" sound.
> > > > > > Are they just complaining about surface noise? But they say
> > > > > > it is a processing sound and 78 surface noise by itself doesn't
> > > > > > sound like ringing to me.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This amazon review doesn't say enough, I can't tell what is
> > > > > > being talked about, why is the Liszt Concerto unacceptable,
> > > > > > Presto saying it is from 1936, not from the early 1920's:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This is an early response based on sampling discs 1, 2, & 6.
> > > > > > Unfortunately there seems to be a fault in the production of
> > > > > > these discs. I'm well aware that these are very old recordings
> > > > > > and are bound to sound poor in comparison to Gieseking's later
> > > > > > recordings, but the issue I'm having both on my computer and on
> > > > > > my hi fi system is a digital ringing at roughly the freqency area
> > > > > > around and above piano middle C. I have made digital transfers of
> > > > > > old material myself and recall this issues as arising from some
> > > > > > lack of synchronisation in the DAC. Unfortunately, I don't have
> > > > > > the knowledge to diagnose the fault precisely. It is, however, a
> > > > > > fault. I've checked other historical recordings on my systems and
> > > > > > my ears, just to be certain that I can isolate it. There is
> > > > > > definitely an issue with this Warner edition. What should I do?
> > > > > > Will Warner recall the discs and replace the faulty ones? Since
> > > > > > I've sampled three discs so far and found the same fault on each
> > > > > > one, I'm not optimistic about the rest.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > UPDATE. I started to listen to disc 3, which has the Liszt First
> > > > > > Piano Concerto. The sound of this is simply unacceptable for an
> > > > > > issue by a major company. There is considerable distortion and
> > > > > > that same digital ringing I noted on other discs. All of this
> > > > > > indicates an unbelievably sloppy job by whoever was employed to
> > > > > > do the transfers and a lack of checking further up the chain. I'm
> > > > > > surprised, because other Warner boxes, e.g. the Barbirolli, have
> > > > > > been excellent. I'm returning the set to Amazon and hope that
> > > > > > Warner will do the decent thing and bring all the discs in the
> > > > > > Gieseking set up to their usual high standard.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Thursday, December 1, 2022 at 7:30:53 PM UTC-5, Pluted Pup wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Thu, 01 Dec 2022 12:18:04 -0800, Invocation wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Yes, it is pretty obvious. I am wondering if Warner will redo those problematic tracks.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Thursday, December 1, 2022 at 1:29:07 AM UTC-5, Jonathan Ben Schragadove wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > Started sampling some of the discs in the new Gieseking boxed set on Warner, and on some of the 1930's tracks I'm wondering if there are issues with the remastering: an annoying ringing tone. There is a review on Amazon that describes this in more detail. Anyone else hearing things?
> > > > > > > > Is the ringing sound from Noise Reduction?
> > > > >
> > > > > I just, finally, received this box yesterday, so haven't listened to much, but sampled some tracks and went through disc 1. Notably, some of the Homocords on that earliest disc are the Seth Winner transfers from the previous outstanding APR issue. I am not sure why they didn't use all of Seth's work. There is not problem with any of "his" tracks. Gieseking completists need to get the APR because it includes the Brunswick recordings. The Mozart "Turkish" excerpt on disc 6 is similarly afflicted with the ringing sound. I have not the knowledge to know what the problem is, but I am guessing it occurred late in the mastering phase. As for the Liszt Concerto, what is most noticeable to me is the extremely worn condition of the first movement. I have wondered if Art & Son is limited mostly to whatever Warner has in their archives. Independents like Seth Winner, who had a Gieseking series on Pearl, and Ward Marston, who made a number of Gieseking transfers for Naxos, have access
to
> > a
> > > > > network of collectors and institutions and can track down the best copies from anywhere in the world. I mention this because it has happened before. In the otherwise outstanding Furtwängler complete set, the discs used by Art & Son for the Brahms 1 were in dire condition in complete contrast to the rest of the set.
> > > > Can you describe the "ringing"? Is it surface noise, is it
> > > > noise reduction? Noise reduction can have a whiny sound.
> > > >
> > > > I far prefer surface noise to noise reduction artifacts.
> > >
> > > To me it sounds like a metallic resonance. You might think your tweeter was damaged or a piece of metal vibrating. Such noises are not uncommon on distorting or worn piano recordings, but this is subtly different, higher pitched and rather disembodied from the musical sound. I am still working my way through the discs, so can't say how much is afflicted. Never throughout an entire disc, and only certain short pieces. So far, the concertos, except the worn out parts of the Liszt, and sonatas are fine. The "Emperor" presumably from master pressings, is outstandingly good. The Turkish excerpt I mentioned is really disc 5. Can't see! Items with flute, also on APR, are affected, mostly in the flute passages. Probably less than an hour's worth notably afflicted so far, but I have a way to go through the 78s. I am listening on Amphion speakers and they have a very strong treble "presence." Other models or headphones or higher listening levels than my lease permit might yield
different
> > > results, maybe less so with a treble rolloff. Surface noise is strong on some tracks.
> > Anyway, I bought the set. I predict I'll describe it as "that does
> > sound like ringing but it's hard to describe".
> > > Art & Son usually don't overdo the noise reduction.
> > You can't go by names: Is Sony's Meyer or b-sharp good?
> > They did a terrible job on Richter's 1960 Columbia live
> > recordings. Is Ward Marston good? Sony placed his name
> > on the terrible engineering of the Complete Rachmaninoff set.
> > Is Keith Hardwick good? EMI placed his name on the 1990
> > Schnabel set. All three sets and engineering were severely
> > muffled by noise reduction.
> > > We need a technical expert to weigh in.
> > We don't need the type of experts who always apologizes for
> > intrusive engineering. We need the types who analyzes and
> > explains.
> >
> > (Sorry for the TD derangement syndrome)
>
> Lordy, Ward's Rachmaninoff set for RCA was thirty years ago.

30 years ago but remains the current version. It was reissued
in the early 2000's and removed information from the booklet,
not even including recording dates.

> Reports are RCA messed with it.

But they libeled Ward Marston by only listing him as
the engineer and not listing the mastering engineer who
did the severe noise reduction.

> If you haven't heard his other work, including an ongoing Rach (one cd to go) for Naxos, you are missing a lot of the best.

Are the Naxos discs Ward Marston's original masters before
RCA ruined them or are they a different master?

> The Sony crowd is mostly good. They have had a few misses but acceptable, and sometimes better, esp. with lacquer-based Columbias. Keith Hardwick died years, maybe a couple decades, ago. That Schnabel set is even older than the RCA. I don't think Keith had anything to do with EMI's noise reduction during the cd era. When he retired and started working for Testament and Pearl, the surface noise reassuringly returned.


Click here to read the complete article
Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?

<055c8082-e5a7-4678-bb36-f426c1ac21can@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=51366&group=rec.music.classical.recordings#51366

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
X-Received: by 2002:a37:b4b:0:b0:706:8a44:77ed with SMTP id 72-20020a370b4b000000b007068a4477edmr1922971qkl.416.1674788150642;
Thu, 26 Jan 2023 18:55:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:d14f:b0:163:57fb:ab45 with SMTP id
f15-20020a056870d14f00b0016357fbab45mr318589oac.280.1674788150197; Thu, 26
Jan 2023 18:55:50 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2023 18:55:49 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <0001HW.29836A3A021FC082306ADF38F@news.giganews.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=73.206.251.221; posting-account=-nn6iAoAAACIDorU6rmfqvJkXr2Wflxe
NNTP-Posting-Host: 73.206.251.221
References: <e177e92e-1fe4-49f5-abfa-b94ea1d0b1bbn@googlegroups.com>
<a46c1208-6685-4d54-b66c-0409e988e27fn@googlegroups.com> <0001HW.29397EB501A2F17230B47638F@news.giganews.com>
<d2994882-4fb7-46c2-ad9e-50d47baad636n@googlegroups.com> <0001HW.293D16D501E0747D30AE5E38F@news.giganews.com>
<008c3d69-c7c5-4d99-9421-908cec6ef31bn@googlegroups.com> <0001HW.2979E7DC0186369D30E4EA38F@news.giganews.com>
<af315799-ddc5-42c1-b405-07e2412917b8n@googlegroups.com> <0001HW.297C7BE101AD5F76309A1138F@news.giganews.com>
<471fc302-8b8b-4d0d-ad4e-8477be963a24n@googlegroups.com> <0001HW.29836A3A021FC082306ADF38F@news.giganews.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <055c8082-e5a7-4678-bb36-f426c1ac21can@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?
From: vladhoro...@hotmail.com (vhorowitz)
Injection-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 02:55:50 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 11956
 by: vhorowitz - Fri, 27 Jan 2023 02:55 UTC

On Thursday, January 26, 2023 at 8:11:14 PM UTC-6, Pluted Pup wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Jan 2023 16:05:34 -0800, drh8h wrote:
>
> > On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 3:00:42 PM UTC-5, Pluted Pup wrote:
> > > On Thu, 19 Jan 2023 17:32:59 -0800, drh8h wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Thursday, January 19, 2023 at 4:04:35 PM UTC-5, Pluted Pup wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, 18 Jan 2023 05:40:51 -0800, drh8h wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Sunday, December 4, 2022 at 12:56:43 PM UTC-5, Pluted Pup wrote:
> > > > > > > On Sat, 03 Dec 2022 12:48:03 -0800, Invocation wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The ringing sound is caused by using poor quality 78s discs..
> > > > > > > I don't know what the listeners are saying by "ringing" sound..
> > > > > > > Are they just complaining about surface noise? But they say
> > > > > > > it is a processing sound and 78 surface noise by itself doesn't
> > > > > > > sound like ringing to me.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > This amazon review doesn't say enough, I can't tell what is
> > > > > > > being talked about, why is the Liszt Concerto unacceptable,
> > > > > > > Presto saying it is from 1936, not from the early 1920's:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > This is an early response based on sampling discs 1, 2, & 6.
> > > > > > > Unfortunately there seems to be a fault in the production of
> > > > > > > these discs. I'm well aware that these are very old recordings
> > > > > > > and are bound to sound poor in comparison to Gieseking's later
> > > > > > > recordings, but the issue I'm having both on my computer and on
> > > > > > > my hi fi system is a digital ringing at roughly the freqency area
> > > > > > > around and above piano middle C. I have made digital transfers of
> > > > > > > old material myself and recall this issues as arising from some
> > > > > > > lack of synchronisation in the DAC. Unfortunately, I don't have
> > > > > > > the knowledge to diagnose the fault precisely. It is, however, a
> > > > > > > fault. I've checked other historical recordings on my systems and
> > > > > > > my ears, just to be certain that I can isolate it. There is
> > > > > > > definitely an issue with this Warner edition. What should I do?
> > > > > > > Will Warner recall the discs and replace the faulty ones? Since
> > > > > > > I've sampled three discs so far and found the same fault on each
> > > > > > > one, I'm not optimistic about the rest.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > UPDATE. I started to listen to disc 3, which has the Liszt First
> > > > > > > Piano Concerto. The sound of this is simply unacceptable for an
> > > > > > > issue by a major company. There is considerable distortion and
> > > > > > > that same digital ringing I noted on other discs. All of this
> > > > > > > indicates an unbelievably sloppy job by whoever was employed to
> > > > > > > do the transfers and a lack of checking further up the chain. I'm
> > > > > > > surprised, because other Warner boxes, e.g. the Barbirolli, have
> > > > > > > been excellent. I'm returning the set to Amazon and hope that
> > > > > > > Warner will do the decent thing and bring all the discs in the
> > > > > > > Gieseking set up to their usual high standard.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Thursday, December 1, 2022 at 7:30:53 PM UTC-5, Pluted Pup wrote:
> > > > > > > > > On Thu, 01 Dec 2022 12:18:04 -0800, Invocation wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Yes, it is pretty obvious. I am wondering if Warner will redo those problematic tracks.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, December 1, 2022 at 1:29:07 AM UTC-5, Jonathan Ben Schragadove wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > Started sampling some of the discs in the new Gieseking boxed set on Warner, and on some of the 1930's tracks I'm wondering if there are issues with the remastering: an annoying ringing tone. There is a review on Amazon that describes this in more detail. Anyone else hearing things?
> > > > > > > > > Is the ringing sound from Noise Reduction?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I just, finally, received this box yesterday, so haven't listened to much, but sampled some tracks and went through disc 1. Notably, some of the Homocords on that earliest disc are the Seth Winner transfers from the previous outstanding APR issue. I am not sure why they didn't use all of Seth's work. There is not problem with any of "his" tracks. Gieseking completists need to get the APR because it includes the Brunswick recordings. The Mozart "Turkish" excerpt on disc 6 is similarly afflicted with the ringing sound. I have not the knowledge to know what the problem is, but I am guessing it occurred late in the mastering phase. As for the Liszt Concerto, what is most noticeable to me is the extremely worn condition of the first movement. I have wondered if Art & Son is limited mostly to whatever Warner has in their archives. Independents like Seth Winner, who had a Gieseking series on Pearl, and Ward Marston, who made a number of Gieseking transfers for Naxos, have access
> to
> > > a
> > > > > > network of collectors and institutions and can track down the best copies from anywhere in the world. I mention this because it has happened before. In the otherwise outstanding Furtwängler complete set, the discs used by Art & Son for the Brahms 1 were in dire condition in complete contrast to the rest of the set.
> > > > > Can you describe the "ringing"? Is it surface noise, is it
> > > > > noise reduction? Noise reduction can have a whiny sound.
> > > > >
> > > > > I far prefer surface noise to noise reduction artifacts.
> > > >
> > > > To me it sounds like a metallic resonance. You might think your tweeter was damaged or a piece of metal vibrating. Such noises are not uncommon on distorting or worn piano recordings, but this is subtly different, higher pitched and rather disembodied from the musical sound. I am still working my way through the discs, so can't say how much is afflicted. Never throughout an entire disc, and only certain short pieces. So far, the concertos, except the worn out parts of the Liszt, and sonatas are fine. The "Emperor" presumably from master pressings, is outstandingly good. The Turkish excerpt I mentioned is really disc 5. Can't see! Items with flute, also on APR, are affected, mostly in the flute passages. Probably less than an hour's worth notably afflicted so far, but I have a way to go through the 78s. I am listening on Amphion speakers and they have a very strong treble "presence." Other models or headphones or higher listening levels than my lease permit might yield
> different
> > > > results, maybe less so with a treble rolloff. Surface noise is strong on some tracks.
> > > Anyway, I bought the set. I predict I'll describe it as "that does
> > > sound like ringing but it's hard to describe".
> > > > Art & Son usually don't overdo the noise reduction.
> > > You can't go by names: Is Sony's Meyer or b-sharp good?
> > > They did a terrible job on Richter's 1960 Columbia live
> > > recordings. Is Ward Marston good? Sony placed his name
> > > on the terrible engineering of the Complete Rachmaninoff set.
> > > Is Keith Hardwick good? EMI placed his name on the 1990
> > > Schnabel set. All three sets and engineering were severely
> > > muffled by noise reduction.
> > > > We need a technical expert to weigh in.
> > > We don't need the type of experts who always apologizes for
> > > intrusive engineering. We need the types who analyzes and
> > > explains.
> > >
> > > (Sorry for the TD derangement syndrome)
> >
> > Lordy, Ward's Rachmaninoff set for RCA was thirty years ago.
> 30 years ago but remains the current version. It was reissued
> in the early 2000's and removed information from the booklet,
> not even including recording dates.
> > Reports are RCA messed with it.
> But they libeled Ward Marston by only listing him as
> the engineer and not listing the mastering engineer who
> did the severe noise reduction.
> > If you haven't heard his other work, including an ongoing Rach (one cd to go) for Naxos, you are missing a lot of the best.
> Are the Naxos discs Ward Marston's original masters before
> RCA ruined them or are they a different master?
> > The Sony crowd is mostly good. They have had a few misses but acceptable, and sometimes better, esp. with lacquer-based Columbias. Keith Hardwick died years, maybe a couple decades, ago. That Schnabel set is even older than the RCA. I don't think Keith had anything to do with EMI's noise reduction during the cd era. When he retired and started working for Testament and Pearl, the surface noise reassuringly returned.
> He was libeled by EMI, by only including his name as engineer
> and not the name of the mastering engineer who applied the
> "NoNoise/Cedar".
> > As for experts, I surely am not one, and if you gathered them all in a room, I doubt there would much agreement even about the weather.
> We need analysis and explanation from experts, the only
> disagreement would be how to use the resulting information.
> Mastering information is critical to the sound of a
> recording.


Click here to read the complete article

arts / rec.music.classical.recordings / Re: Problem with Gieseking Warner box?

Pages:12
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.81
clearnet tor