https://www.imdb.com/title/tt11692064/?ref_=nv_sr_srsg_0

On 2021-06-03 05:25:21 +0000, RichA said:
>
> https://www.imdb.com/title/tt11692064/?ref_=nv_sr_srsg_0

It's got Taylor Swift in it ... singers who think they can act (and
vice versa) are never a good idea.

On Thu, 3 Jun 2021 17:59:18 +1200, Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com>
wrote:

>
>It's got Taylor Swift in it ... singers who think they can act (and
>vice versa) are never a good idea.

Unless lucky. Not Sting in Dune, nor quite John the Revelator when
robbing the crib for arrested girls, but significant by Story Monday,
the London nightclub owner/operator, where production efforts
conceived perhaps he should be well looked after for a private role of
character parts of wife-cheater, music lover, and a secondary integral
to his betters. A colorful medley nevertheless of corruption
principally carried by three developed character actors his senior.
However lucky then works for someone as a pop star, that as a teacher
starting obviously was in need of somewhere else to go pop.

On 6/3/21 12:25 AM, RichA wrote:
> https://www.imdb.com/title/tt11692064/?ref_=nv_sr_srsg_0

If you have no idea how good a filmmaker David O. Russell is you have no
fucking business being on this group you moron.

trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:

> On 6/3/21 12:25 AM, RichA wrote:
>> https://www.imdb.com/title/tt11692064/?ref_=nv_sr_srsg_0
>
> If you have no idea how good a filmmaker David O. Russell is you have
> no fucking business being on this group you moron.

Even the finest occasionally produce less-than-brilliant cinematic pieces.
Think Kurosawa's Rhapsody in August, or Kubrick's Eyes Wide Shut.
--
/* * * Otto J. Makela <om@iki.fi> * * * * * * * * * */
/* Phone: +358 40 765 5772, ICBM: N 60 10' E 24 55' */
/* Mail: Mechelininkatu 26 B 27, FI-00100 Helsinki */
/* * * Computers Rule 01001111 01001011 * * * * * * */

On 6/3/2021 12:59 AM, Your Name wrote:
> On 2021-06-03 05:25:21 +0000, RichA said:
>>
>> https://www.imdb.com/title/tt11692064/?ref_=nv_sr_srsg_0
>
> It's got Taylor Swift in it ... singers who think they can act (and vice
> versa) are never a good idea.

So you are going to throw out the Cher movies ?

Lynn

In article <s9brn5$vta$2@dont-email.me>,
Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 6/3/2021 12:59 AM, Your Name wrote:
>> On 2021-06-03 05:25:21 +0000, RichA said:
>>>
>>> https://www.imdb.com/title/tt11692064/?ref_=nv_sr_srsg_0
>>
>> It's got Taylor Swift in it ... singers who think they can act (and vice
>> versa) are never a good idea.
>
>So you are going to throw out the Cher movies ?
>
>Lynn
>

And Sinatra's awards?

On 2021-06-04 00:21:53 +0000, Lynn McGuire said:
> On 6/3/2021 12:59 AM, Your Name wrote:
>> On 2021-06-03 05:25:21 +0000, RichA said:
>>>
>>> https://www.imdb.com/title/tt11692064/?ref_=nv_sr_srsg_0
>>
>> It's got Taylor Swift in it ... singers who think they can act (and
>> vice versa) are never a good idea.
>
> So you are going to throw out the Cher movies ?
>
> Lynn

I think I've ever seen, nor wanted to see, any movie she's been in, but
the above statement stands (the exception can be musicals where of
course they are mostly singing anyway).

On 6/4/21 10:03 AM, RichA wrote:
> On Thursday, 3 June 2021 at 07:32:36 UTC-4, gmsin...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On 6/3/21 12:25 AM, RichA wrote:
>>> https://www.imdb.com/title/tt11692064/?ref_=nv_sr_srsg_0
>>
>>
>> If you have no idea how good a filmmaker David O. Russell is you have no
>> fucking business being on this group you moron.
>
> "No idea" as in, "do not know what it is about or if I'd like the plot." Feel free to add something, anything of value.

Something of value? You're too fucking stupid to understand it. Do you
think people "need to know the plot" before they decide if they want to
see a Scorcese film? You're talking shit as usual.

On 6/3/21 9:46 AM, Otto J. Makela wrote:
> trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
>
>> On 6/3/21 12:25 AM, RichA wrote:
>>> https://www.imdb.com/title/tt11692064/?ref_=nv_sr_srsg_0
>>
>> If you have no idea how good a filmmaker David O. Russell is you have
>> no fucking business being on this group you moron.
>
> Even the finest occasionally produce less-than-brilliant cinematic pieces.
> Think Kurosawa's Rhapsody in August, or Kubrick's Eyes Wide Shut.

That doesn't mean the director attached to the project isn't a known
brand that people "need to no the plot" before they'll see his film. "I
have to find out more before I'll see the next Kurosawa film" would just
make you sound like an asshole.

trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:

> On 6/3/21 9:46 AM, Otto J. Makela wrote:
>> trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
>>> On 6/3/21 12:25 AM, RichA wrote:
>>>> https://www.imdb.com/title/tt11692064/?ref_=nv_sr_srsg_0
>>> If you have no idea how good a filmmaker David O. Russell is you
>>> have no fucking business being on this group you moron.
>> Even the finest occasionally produce less-than-brilliant
>> cinematic pieces. Think Kurosawa's Rhapsody in August, or
>> Kubrick's Eyes Wide Shut.
>
> That doesn't mean the director attached to the project isn't a known
> brand that people "need to no the plot" before they'll see his film.

Sorry, not being a native English speaker, I'm really having a hard
time understanding what you're trying to say. Is the "no" perhaps
supposed to be "know"?

> "I have to find out more before I'll see the next Kurosawa film"
> would just make you sound like an asshole.

I do admit I find some Kurosawa films slightly boring, and trying to
infer exactly what RichA was trying to convey with just one subject
line is a bit too much of a stretch.

--
/* * * Otto J. Makela <om@iki.fi> * * * * * * * * * */
/* Phone: +358 40 765 5772, ICBM: N 60 10' E 24 55' */
/* Mail: Mechelininkatu 26 B 27, FI-00100 Helsinki */
/* * * Computers Rule 01001111 01001011 * * * * * * */

On Tue, 08 Jun 2021 17:04:28 +0300, om@iki.fi (Otto J. Makela) wrote:

>I do admit I find some Kurosawa films slightly boring, and trying to
>infer exactly what RichA was trying to convey with just one subject
>line is a bit too much of a stretch.

Coincidently happened I watched Kurosawa's Kagemusha (1980) a couple
days ago. Even with two subject lines, slightly boring might not
convey why, based on a thief becoming a Japanese warlord, I'd have
forgone another installment, Dersu Uzala, no doubt also extended in
like accord from glowing reviews as no less to be found based within
the former film. Of course were the foot on the other shoe, so to
speak, and were films any less obscure among instances of evident
prodigy readily at hand, then, in the case of Fellini's Satyricon, I'd
simply have to compellingly put forth arguement, on the other foot, of
surety staged by stellar presentment about why the misadventures of
two ancient Roman fags is so compelling relevant, dearest readers and
idolizers of the anti-Kurosawa in Fellini.

On 6/8/21 9:04 AM, Otto J. Makela wrote:
> trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
>
>> On 6/3/21 9:46 AM, Otto J. Makela wrote:
>>> trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
>>>> On 6/3/21 12:25 AM, RichA wrote:
>>>>> https://www.imdb.com/title/tt11692064/?ref_=nv_sr_srsg_0
>>>> If you have no idea how good a filmmaker David O. Russell is you
>>>> have no fucking business being on this group you moron.
>>> Even the finest occasionally produce less-than-brilliant
>>> cinematic pieces. Think Kurosawa's Rhapsody in August, or
>>> Kubrick's Eyes Wide Shut.
>>
>> That doesn't mean the director attached to the project isn't a known
>> brand that people "need to no the plot" before they'll see his film.
>
> Sorry, not being a native English speaker, I'm really having a hard
> time understanding what you're trying to say. Is the "no" perhaps
> supposed to be "know"?
>
>> "I have to find out more before I'll see the next Kurosawa film"
>> would just make you sound like an asshole.
>
> I do admit I find some Kurosawa films slightly boring, and trying to
> infer exactly what RichA was trying to convey with just one subject
> line is a bit too much of a stretch.

You didn't read the original post? You don't have to be able to speak
English to follow a thread on a discussion group.

trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:

> On 6/8/21 9:04 AM, Otto J. Makela wrote:
>> trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
>>> On 6/3/21 9:46 AM, Otto J. Makela wrote:
>>>> trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 6/3/21 12:25 AM, RichA wrote:
>>>>>> https://www.imdb.com/title/tt11692064/?ref_=nv_sr_srsg_0
>>>>> If you have no idea how good a filmmaker David O. Russell is you
>>>>> have no fucking business being on this group you moron.
>>>> Even the finest occasionally produce less-than-brilliant
>>>> cinematic pieces. Think Kurosawa's Rhapsody in August, or
>>>> Kubrick's Eyes Wide Shut.
>>> That doesn't mean the director attached to the project isn't a known
>>> brand that people "need to no the plot" before they'll see his film.
>> Sorry, not being a native English speaker, I'm really having a hard
>> time understanding what you're trying to say. Is the "no" perhaps
>> supposed to be "know"?

You neglected to answer my question.

>>> "I have to find out more before I'll see the next Kurosawa film"
>>> would just make you sound like an asshole.
>> I do admit I find some Kurosawa films slightly boring, and trying to
>> infer exactly what RichA was trying to convey with just one subject
>> line is a bit too much of a stretch.
>
> You didn't read the original post? You don't have to be able to speak
> English to follow a thread on a discussion group.

I'd like to point out that the original RichA message in all its
glorious complexity is quoted above, I certainly have read it.
As I said, all he really posted was a short Subject and that link.
--
/* * * Otto J. Makela <om@iki.fi> * * * * * * * * * */
/* Phone: +358 40 765 5772, ICBM: N 60 10' E 24 55' */
/* Mail: Mechelininkatu 26 B 27, FI-00100 Helsinki */
/* * * Computers Rule 01001111 01001011 * * * * * * */

On Monday, 7 June 2021 at 05:24:39 UTC-4, gmsin...@gmail.com wrote:
> On 6/3/21 9:46 AM, Otto J. Makela wrote:
> > trotsky <gms...@email.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On 6/3/21 12:25 AM, RichA wrote:
> >>> https://www.imdb.com/title/tt11692064/?ref_=nv_sr_srsg_0
> >>
> >> If you have no idea how good a filmmaker David O. Russell is you have
> >> no fucking business being on this group you moron.
> >
> > Even the finest occasionally produce less-than-brilliant cinematic pieces.
> > Think Kurosawa's Rhapsody in August, or Kubrick's Eyes Wide Shut.
> That doesn't mean the director attached to the project isn't a known
> brand that people "need to no the plot" before they'll see his film. "I
> have to find out more before I'll see the next Kurosawa film" would just
> make you sound like an asshole.

Is that any way to talk to a fellow foreigner, Trotsky?

On Thursday, 3 June 2021 at 07:32:36 UTC-4, gmsin...@gmail.com wrote:
> On 6/3/21 12:25 AM, RichA wrote:
> > https://www.imdb.com/title/tt11692064/?ref_=nv_sr_srsg_0
>
>
> If you have no idea how good a filmmaker David O. Russell is you have no
> fucking business being on this group you moron.

"No idea" as in, "do not know what it is about or if I'd like the plot." Feel free to add something, anything of value.