"Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep. 14, 2022

It should be obvious to anyone reading the list that there has been a
sharp increase in Jim Senetto's this past week. However, "obvious" isn't
always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for statistical evidence, I
decided to see what I could come up with.

Methodology - I decided to limit myself to the subject's OPs, to
eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will, or that simply
quoted mentions of Will, neither of which is credible evidence of
obsession. Using the Google feed,

For the previous 7 days (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of OPs made
by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, for the 7-day period
Sept. 7-13 and used the latter as a percentage of the former to
calculate the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the
previous 8 days (Aug. 30-Sep. 6), adding an extra day to make up for
Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).

Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10 of which
mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession Index of
55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the subject's OPs
nearly doubled, from 18 to 35. Even more dramatic was the rise in posts
mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29, nearly triple. Which
gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.

I think these figures speak for themselves.

(cleaned-up copy)

"Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep. 14, 2022

It should be obvious to anyone reading aapc that there has been a
sharp increase in Jim Senetto's Will Dockery Obsession this past week.
However, "obvious" isn't always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for
statistical evidence, I decided to see what I could come up with.

Methodology - I decided to use only the subject's OPs, to
eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will Dockery, or posts
quoted mentions of Will Dockery in the backthread (neither of which is
credible evidence of
obsession. Using the Google feed).

For the observation period (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of OPs made
by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, and used the latter
as a percentage of the former to calculate
the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the previous 8 days
(Aug. 30-Sep. 6) as a control, adding an extra day to make up for
Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).

Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10 of which
mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession Index of
55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the subject's OPs
rose from 18 to 35 (up 94%). Even more dramatic was the rise in posts
mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29 (up 190%), which
gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.

Conclusion - I think these figures speak for themselves.

George J. Dance wrote:
>
> (cleaned-up copy)

> "Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep. 14, 2022

> It should be obvious to anyone reading aapc that there has been a
> sharp increase in Jim Senetto's Will Dockery Obsession this past week.
> However, "obvious" isn't always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for
> statistical evidence, I decided to see what I could come up with.

> Methodology - I decided to use only the subject's OPs, to
> eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will Dockery, or posts
> quoted mentions of Will Dockery in the backthread (neither of which is
> credible evidence of
> obsession. Using the Google feed).

> For the observation period (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of OPs made
> by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, and used the latter
> as a percentage of the former to calculate
> the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the previous 8 days
> (Aug. 30-Sep. 6) as a control, adding an extra day to make up for
> Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).

> Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10 of which
> mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession Index of
> 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the subject's OPs
> rose from 18 to 35 (up 94%). Even more dramatic was the rise in posts
> mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29 (up 190%), which
> gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.

> Conclusion - I think these figures speak for themselves.

Again, well put, George Dance.

Thanks again for correcting the lies and misrepresentations and for setting the record straight.

And so it goes.

George J. Dance wrote:

> "Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep. 14, 2022

> It should be obvious to anyone reading the list that there has been a
> sharp increase in Jim Senetto's this past week. However, "obvious" isn't
> always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for statistical evidence, I
> decided to see what I could come up with.

> Methodology - I decided to limit myself to the subject's OPs, to
> eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will, or that simply
> quoted mentions of Will, neither of which is credible evidence of
> obsession. Using the Google feed,

> For the previous 7 days (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of OPs made
> by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, for the 7-day period
> Sept. 7-13 and used the latter as a percentage of the former to
> calculate the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the
> previous 8 days (Aug. 30-Sep. 6), adding an extra day to make up for
> Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).

> Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10 of which
> mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession Index of
> 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the subject's OPs
> nearly doubled, from 18 to 35. Even more dramatic was the rise in posts
> mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29, nearly triple. Which
> gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.

> I think these figures speak for themselves.

Note to Corey:

https://news.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=169631&group=alt.arts.poetry.comments#169631

Have a look at the thread on Nova BBS, and you can see the post was definitely a crosspost:

https://news.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=169631&group=alt.arts.poetry.comments#169631

Will Dockery wrote:

> George J. Dance wrote:

>> "Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep. 14, 2022

>> It should be obvious to anyone reading the list that there has been a
>> sharp increase in Jim Senetto's this past week. However, "obvious" isn't
>> always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for statistical evidence, I
>> decided to see what I could come up with.

>> Methodology - I decided to limit myself to the subject's OPs, to
>> eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will, or that simply
>> quoted mentions of Will, neither of which is credible evidence of
>> obsession. Using the Google feed,

>> For the previous 7 days (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of OPs made
>> by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, for the 7-day period
>> Sept. 7-13 and used the latter as a percentage of the former to
>> calculate the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the
>> previous 8 days (Aug. 30-Sep. 6), adding an extra day to make up for
>> Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).

>> Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10 of which
>> mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession Index of
>> 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the subject's OPs
>> nearly doubled, from 18 to 35. Even more dramatic was the rise in posts
>> mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29, nearly triple. Which
>> gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.

>> I think these figures speak for themselves.

> Note to Corey:

> https://news.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=169631&group=alt.arts.poetry.comments#169631

> Have a look at the thread on Nova BBS, and you can see the post was definitely a crosspost:

> https://news.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=169631&group=alt.arts.poetry.comments#169631

Yes, quite right...

General-Zod wrote:

> Will Dockery wrote:

>> George J. Dance wrote:

>>> "Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep. 14, 2022

>>> It should be obvious to anyone reading the list that there has been a
>>> sharp increase in Jim Senetto's this past week. However, "obvious" isn't
>>> always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for statistical evidence, I
>>> decided to see what I could come up with.

>>> Methodology - I decided to limit myself to the subject's OPs, to
>>> eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will, or that simply
>>> quoted mentions of Will, neither of which is credible evidence of
>>> obsession. Using the Google feed,

>>> For the previous 7 days (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of OPs made
>>> by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, for the 7-day period
>>> Sept. 7-13 and used the latter as a percentage of the former to
>>> calculate the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the
>>> previous 8 days (Aug. 30-Sep. 6), adding an extra day to make up for
>>> Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).

>>> Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10 of which
>>> mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession Index of
>>> 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the subject's OPs
>>> nearly doubled, from 18 to 35. Even more dramatic was the rise in posts
>>> mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29, nearly triple. Which
>>> gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.

>>> I think these figures speak for themselves.

>> Note to Corey:

>> https://news.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=169631&group=alt.arts.poetry.comments#169631

>> Have a look at the thread on Nova BBS, and you can see the post was definitely a crosspost:

>> https://news.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=169631&group=alt.arts.poetry.comments#169631

> Yes, quite right...

Corey admitted he was mistaken.

George J. Dance wrote:

>
> "Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep. 14, 2022

> It should be obvious to anyone reading the list that there has been a
> sharp increase in Jim Senetto's this past week. However, "obvious" isn't
> always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for statistical evidence, I
> decided to see what I could come up with.

> Methodology - I decided to limit myself to the subject's OPs, to
> eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will, or that simply
> quoted mentions of Will, neither of which is credible evidence of
> obsession. Using the Google feed,

> For the previous 7 days (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of OPs made
> by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, for the 7-day period
> Sept. 7-13 and used the latter as a percentage of the former to
> calculate the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the
> previous 8 days (Aug. 30-Sep. 6), adding an extra day to make up for
> Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).

> Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10 of which
> mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession Index of
> 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the subject's OPs
> nearly doubled, from 18 to 35. Even more dramatic was the rise in posts
> mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29, nearly triple. Which
> gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.

> I think these figures speak for themselves.

Yep... well put, G.D.

George J. Dance wrote:
>
> (cleaned-up copy)

> "Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep. 14, 2022

> It should be obvious to anyone reading aapc that there has been a
> sharp increase in Jim Senetto's Will Dockery Obsession this past week.
> However, "obvious" isn't always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for
> statistical evidence, I decided to see what I could come up with.

> Methodology - I decided to use only the subject's OPs, to
> eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will Dockery, or posts
> quoted mentions of Will Dockery in the backthread (neither of which is
> credible evidence of
> obsession. Using the Google feed).

> For the observation period (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of OPs made
> by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, and used the latter
> as a percentage of the former to calculate
> the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the previous 8 days
> (Aug. 30-Sep. 6) as a control, adding an extra day to make up for
> Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).

> Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10 of which
> mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession Index of
> 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the subject's OPs
> rose from 18 to 35 (up 94%). Even more dramatic was the rise in posts
> mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29 (up 190%), which
> gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.

> Conclusion - I think these figures speak for themselves.

NancyGene is sniffing along today, apparently.

On Thursday, October 20, 2022 at 10:38:16 AM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> On 2022-10-20 9:47 a.m., jdcha...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Thursday, October 20, 2022 at 8:43:53 AM UTC-4, blackpo...@aol.com wrote:
> >> On Thursday, October 20, 2022 at 8:34:08 AM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> >>> On 2022-10-20 8:28 a.m., Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:
> >>>> On Thursday, October 20, 2022 at 8:02:28 AM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> >>>>> On 2022-10-19 8:50 p.m., Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Saturday, December 28, 2002 at 4:12:42 PM UTC-5, opb...@yahoo.com
> >>>>> wrote:> and you know… that over the years, I HAVE

<Troll snipped>

> >>>>> Why are you post-editing 20-year old conversations from rec.arts.poems,
> >>>>> Chimp?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Will Dockery...16 years ago
> >>>>
> >>>> "I consider myself, above all else, an entertainer, and many people do dig a
> >>>> kick-ass folk-rock performance.
> >>>>
> >>>> Musicians see what I'm all about and want a piece of that action, and I'm a
> >>>> free agent to bring my "special guest star" to anyone who calls my name, to
> >>>> climb onstage and reach into my bag of tricks.
> >>>>
> >>>> It's a great, bumpy and wild ride being Will Dockery, and I wouldn't trade
> >>>> it for all the world's gold."
> >>>>
> >>> He sounds like someone happy with his life. No wonder you envy and
> >>> resent him so.
> >> Nothing better

<Malicious lies and misrepresentations from Jim Senetto snipped>
> >> There is nothing else to know about Will Dockery.

As if you'd ever stop obsessing over me, Senetto?
> > actually, there's plenty of other explanations that are possible... perhaps he was grieving and was too sad and distressed to share the info here... or perhaps he felt that the info was too personal and wouldn't be recieved with sympathy and support in a group that is quite often toxic and malicious and nasty and mean spirited and hateful...
> Thank you, Jordy; those are all good hypotheses. But I'm afraid you left
> out the most obvious one:
>
> He didn't want ace reporter "Edward Rochester" post-editing his comments
> and putting them in a trollthread.

Well put, George.

(Moved from the troll thread)

Will Dockery wrote:

> On Thursday, October 20, 2022 at 10:38:16 AM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
>> On 2022-10-20 9:47 a.m., jdcha...@gmail.com wrote:
>> > On Thursday, October 20, 2022 at 8:43:53 AM UTC-4, blackpo...@aol.com wrote:
>> >> On Thursday, October 20, 2022 at 8:34:08 AM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
>> >>> On 2022-10-20 8:28 a.m., Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:
>> >>>> On Thursday, October 20, 2022 at 8:02:28 AM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
>> >>>>> On 2022-10-19 8:50 p.m., Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> On Saturday, December 28, 2002 at 4:12:42 PM UTC-5, opb...@yahoo.com
>> >>>>> wrote:> and you know… that over the years, I HAVE

> <Troll snipped>

>> >>>>> Why are you post-editing 20-year old conversations from rec.arts.poems,
>> >>>>> Chimp?
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Will Dockery...16 years ago
>> >>>>
>> >>>> "I consider myself, above all else, an entertainer, and many people do dig a
>> >>>> kick-ass folk-rock performance.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Musicians see what I'm all about and want a piece of that action, and I'm a
>> >>>> free agent to bring my "special guest star" to anyone who calls my name, to
>> >>>> climb onstage and reach into my bag of tricks.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> It's a great, bumpy and wild ride being Will Dockery, and I wouldn't trade
>> >>>> it for all the world's gold."
>> >>>>
>> >>> He sounds like someone happy with his life. No wonder you envy and
>> >>> resent him so.
>> >> Nothing better

> <Malicious lies and misrepresentations from Jim Senetto snipped>

>> >> There is nothing else to know about Will Dockery.

> As if you'd ever stop obsessing over me, Senetto?

>> > actually, there's plenty of other explanations that are possible... perhaps he was grieving and was too sad and distressed to share the info here... or perhaps he felt that the info was too personal and wouldn't be recieved with sympathy and support in a group that is quite often toxic and malicious and nasty and mean spirited and hateful...
>> Thank you, Jordy; those are all good hypotheses. But I'm afraid you left
>> out the most obvious one:
>>
>> He didn't want ace reporter "Edward Rochester" post-editing his comments
>> and putting them in a trollthread.

> Well put, George.

> (Moved from the troll thread)

Agreed and seconded....

George J. Dance wrote:

>
> "Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep. 14, 2022

> It should be obvious to anyone reading the list that there has been a
> sharp increase in Jim Senetto's this past week. However, "obvious" isn't
> always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for statistical evidence, I
> decided to see what I could come up with.

> Methodology - I decided to limit myself to the subject's OPs, to
> eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will, or that simply
> quoted mentions of Will, neither of which is credible evidence of
> obsession. Using the Google feed,

> For the previous 7 days (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of OPs made
> by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, for the 7-day period
> Sept. 7-13 and used the latter as a percentage of the former to
> calculate the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the
> previous 8 days (Aug. 30-Sep. 6), adding an extra day to make up for
> Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).

> Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10 of which
> mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession Index of
> 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the subject's OPs
> nearly doubled, from 18 to 35. Even more dramatic was the rise in posts
> mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29, nearly triple. Which
> gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.

> I think these figures speak for themselves.

And Jim Senetto's numbers continue to rise.

:)

George J. Dance wrote:

> "Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep. 14, 2022

> It should be obvious to anyone reading the list that there has been a
> sharp increase in Jim Senetto's this past week. However, "obvious" isn't
> always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for statistical evidence, I
> decided to see what I could come up with.

> Methodology - I decided to limit myself to the subject's OPs, to
> eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will, or that simply
> quoted mentions of Will, neither of which is credible evidence of
> obsession. Using the Google feed,

> For the previous 7 days (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of OPs made
> by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, for the 7-day period
> Sept. 7-13 and used the latter as a percentage of the former to
> calculate the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the
> previous 8 days (Aug. 30-Sep. 6), adding an extra day to make up for
> Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).

> Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10 of which
> mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession Index of
> 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the subject's OPs
> nearly doubled, from 18 to 35. Even more dramatic was the rise in posts
> mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29, nearly triple. Which
> gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.

> I think these figures speak for themselves.

Senetto obsesses on, heading for his inevitable meltdown.

And so it goes.

George J. Dance wrote:
>

> "Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep. 14, 2022

> It should be obvious to anyone reading the list that there has been a
> sharp increase in Jim Senetto's this past week. However, "obvious" isn't
> always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for statistical evidence, I
> decided to see what I could come up with.

> Methodology - I decided to limit myself to the subject's OPs, to
> eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will, or that simply
> quoted mentions of Will, neither of which is credible evidence of
> obsession. Using the Google feed,

> For the previous 7 days (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of OPs made
> by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, for the 7-day period
> Sept. 7-13 and used the latter as a percentage of the former to
> calculate the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the
> previous 8 days (Aug. 30-Sep. 6), adding an extra day to make up for
> Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).

> Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10 of which
> mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession Index of
> 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the subject's OPs
> nearly doubled, from 18 to 35. Even more dramatic was the rise in posts
> mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29, nearly triple. Which
> gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.

> I think these figures speak for themselves.

Jim Senetto is now sniffing George Dance farts now, of course.

🙂

George J. Dance wrote:
>

> "Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep. 14, 2022

> It should be obvious to anyone reading the list that there has been a
> sharp increase in Jim Senetto's this past week. However, "obvious" isn't
> always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for statistical evidence, I
> decided to see what I could come up with.

> Methodology - I decided to limit myself to the subject's OPs, to
> eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will, or that simply
> quoted mentions of Will, neither of which is credible evidence of
> obsession. Using the Google feed,

> For the previous 7 days (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of OPs made
> by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, for the 7-day period
> Sept. 7-13 and used the latter as a percentage of the former to
> calculate the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the
> previous 8 days (Aug. 30-Sep. 6), adding an extra day to make up for
> Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).

> Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10 of which
> mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession Index of
> 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the subject's OPs
> nearly doubled, from 18 to 35. Even more dramatic was the rise in posts
> mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29, nearly triple. Which
> gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.

> I think these figures speak for themselves.

Speaking of Senetto stats.

🙂

George J. Dance wrote:

>
> "Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep. 14, 2022

> It should be obvious to anyone reading the list that there has been a
> sharp increase in Jim Senetto's this past week. However, "obvious" isn't
> always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for statistical evidence, I
> decided to see what I could come up with.

> Methodology - I decided to limit myself to the subject's OPs, to
> eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will, or that simply
> quoted mentions of Will, neither of which is credible evidence of
> obsession. Using the Google feed,

> For the previous 7 days (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of OPs made
> by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, for the 7-day period
> Sept. 7-13 and used the latter as a percentage of the former to
> calculate the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the
> previous 8 days (Aug. 30-Sep. 6), adding an extra day to make up for
> Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).

> Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10 of which
> mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession Index of
> 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the subject's OPs
> nearly doubled, from 18 to 35. Even more dramatic was the rise in posts
> mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29, nearly triple. Which
> gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.

> I think these figures speak for themselves.

Yep, and the current obsessions here make these figures seem mild... ha ha.

On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 11:12:07 AM UTC-4, Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:
> On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 11:04:54 AM UTC-4, George Dance wrote:
> > On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 11:00:31 AM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> > > George J. Dance wrote:
> > > >
> > > > "Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep. 14, 2022
> > > >
> > > > It should be obvious to anyone reading the list that there has been a
> > > > sharp increase in Jim Senetto's this past week. However, "obvious" isn't
> > > > always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for statistical evidence, I
> > > > decided to see what I could come up with.
> > > >
> > > > Methodology - I decided to limit myself to the subject's OPs, to
> > > > eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will, or that simply
> > > > quoted mentions of Will, neither of which is credible evidence of
> > > > obsession. Using the Google feed,
> > > >
> > > > For the previous 7 days (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of OPs made
> > > > by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, for the 7-day period
> > > > Sept. 7-13 and used the latter as a percentage of the former to
> > > > calculate the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the
> > > > previous 8 days (Aug. 30-Sep. 6), adding an extra day to make up for
> > > > Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).
> > > >
> > > > Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10 of which
> > > > mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession Index of
> > > > 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the subject's OPs
> > > > nearly doubled, from 18 to 35. Even more dramatic was the rise in posts
> > > > mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29, nearly triple. Which
> > > > gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.
> > > >
> > > > I think these figures speak for themselves.
> > > Definitely due for an update.
> > >
> >
> > I did the calculations, just never took the time to write the article. For the last week of May, his Obsession Index was up again, to 86%.
> Your food bill must be up 99%

Since you're so interested, I had a bowl of oatmeal this morning.

Good food, low cost.

How about your food bill, obsesso?

🙂

On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 12:44:35 PM UTC-4, Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:
> On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 12:40:12 PM UTC-4, W-Dockery wrote:
> > Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:
> >
> > > On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 12:20:11 PM UTC-4, W-Dockery wrote:
> > >> Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 11:20:16 AM UTC-4, W.Dockery wrote:
> > >> >> On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 11:12:07 AM UTC-4, Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:
> > >> >> > On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 11:04:54 AM UTC-4, George Dance wrote:
> > >> >> > > On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 11:00:31 AM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> > >> >> > > > George J. Dance wrote:
> > >> >> > > > >
> > >> >> > > > > "Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep. 14, 2022
> > >> >> > > > >
> > >> >> > > > > It should be obvious to anyone reading the list that there has been a
> > >> >> > > > > sharp increase in Jim Senetto's this past week. However, "obvious" isn't
> > >> >> > > > > always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for statistical evidence, I
> > >> >> > > > > decided to see what I could come up with.
> > >> >> > > > >
> > >> >> > > > > Methodology - I decided to limit myself to the subject's OPs, to
> > >> >> > > > > eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will, or that simply
> > >> >> > > > > quoted mentions of Will, neither of which is credible evidence of
> > >> >> > > > > obsession. Using the Google feed,
> > >> >> > > > >
> > >> >> > > > > For the previous 7 days (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of OPs made
> > >> >> > > > > by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, for the 7-day period
> > >> >> > > > > Sept. 7-13 and used the latter as a percentage of the former to
> > >> >> > > > > calculate the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the
> > >> >> > > > > previous 8 days (Aug. 30-Sep. 6), adding an extra day to make up for
> > >> >> > > > > Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).
> > >> >> > > > >
> > >> >> > > > > Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10 of which
> > >> >> > > > > mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession Index of
> > >> >> > > > > 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the subject's OPs
> > >> >> > > > > nearly doubled, from 18 to 35. Even more dramatic was the rise in posts
> > >> >> > > > > mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29, nearly triple. Which
> > >> >> > > > > gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.
> > >> >> > > > >
> > >> >> > > > > I think these figures speak for themselves.
> > >> >> > > > Definitely due for an update.
> > >> >> > > >
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> > > I did the calculations, just never took the time to write the article.. For the last week of May, his Obsession Index was up again, to 86%.
> > >> >> > Your food bill must be up 99%
> > >> >> Since you're so interested, I had a bowl of oatmeal this morning.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Good food, low cost.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> How about your food bill, obsesso?
> > >> >>
> > >> >
> > >> > Idiot
> > >>
> > >> Look who's talking, an obsessive and feeble-minded old fart.
> > >>
> > >> 🙂
> >
> >
> > > Dockery, I have it all over you
> > Keep telling yourself that while you obsess over me every day, Senetto.
> >
> > You're just a feeble-minded old fart, a gasbag.
> >
> > And so it goes.
> Wow, you're fired up today,,,,,

And you're not?

🙂

George J. Dance wrote:
>
> (cleaned-up copy)

> "Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep. 14, 2022

> It should be obvious to anyone reading aapc that there has been a
> sharp increase in Jim Senetto's Will Dockery Obsession this past week.
> However, "obvious" isn't always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for
> statistical evidence, I decided to see what I could come up with.

> Methodology - I decided to use only the subject's OPs, to
> eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will Dockery, or posts
> quoted mentions of Will Dockery in the backthread (neither of which is
> credible evidence of
> obsession. Using the Google feed).

> For the observation period (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of OPs made
> by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, and used the latter
> as a percentage of the former to calculate
> the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the previous 8 days
> (Aug. 30-Sep. 6) as a control, adding an extra day to make up for
> Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).

> Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10 of which
> mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession Index of
> 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the subject's OPs
> rose from 18 to 35 (up 94%). Even more dramatic was the rise in posts
> mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29 (up 190%), which
> gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.

> Conclusion - I think these figures speak for themselves.

Again, I think this calls out for an update, since Jim Senetto is more unhinged than ever before.

HTH and HAND.

On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 9:45:11 PM UTC-4, W.Dockery wrote:
> George J. Dance wrote:
> >
> > (cleaned-up copy)
>
> > "Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep. 14, 2022
>
> > It should be obvious to anyone reading aapc that there has been a
> > sharp increase in Jim Senetto's Will Dockery Obsession this past week.
> > However, "obvious" isn't always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for
> > statistical evidence, I decided to see what I could come up with.
>
> > Methodology - I decided to use only the subject's OPs, to
> > eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will Dockery, or posts
> > quoted mentions of Will Dockery in the backthread (neither of which is
> > credible evidence of
> > obsession. Using the Google feed).
>
> > For the observation period (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of OPs made
> > by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, and used the latter
> > as a percentage of the former to calculate
> > the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the previous 8 days
> > (Aug. 30-Sep. 6) as a control, adding an extra day to make up for
> > Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).
>
> > Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10 of which
> > mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession Index of
> > 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the subject's OPs
> > rose from 18 to 35 (up 94%). Even more dramatic was the rise in posts
> > mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29 (up 190%), which
> > gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.
>
> > Conclusion - I think these figures speak for themselves.
> Again, I think this calls out for an update, since Jim Senetto is more unhinged than ever before.
>
> HTH and HAND.

How typical. How cowardly. You so called "uncool kids" to trash talk behind people's backs -- like true cyber gossip hen peckers...
You don't value your fellow R.A.P. poets and their work here while you risk the peace you have here by trying to bring the AAPC flame war here. But you fools apparently never cared for others as can be seen here. The Internet Train Wreck Rubberneckers Peanut Gallery has returned their verdict-- you're not just YTA's but petty LoseNet losers to boot.
BTW: Where did all the other RAP poets go-- did they perish under the swill spam?

On Thursday, June 15, 2023 at 3:55:53 AM UTC-4, Ash Wurthing wrote:
> On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 9:45:11 PM UTC-4, W.Dockery wrote:
> > George J. Dance wrote:
> > >
> > > (cleaned-up copy)
> >
> > > "Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep. 14, 2022
> >
> > > It should be obvious to anyone reading aapc that there has been a
> > > sharp increase in Jim Senetto's Will Dockery Obsession this past week..
> > > However, "obvious" isn't always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for
> > > statistical evidence, I decided to see what I could come up with.
> >
> > > Methodology - I decided to use only the subject's OPs, to
> > > eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will Dockery, or posts
> > > quoted mentions of Will Dockery in the backthread (neither of which is
> > > credible evidence of
> > > obsession. Using the Google feed).
> >
> > > For the observation period (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of OPs made
> > > by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, and used the latter
> > > as a percentage of the former to calculate
> > > the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the previous 8 days
> > > (Aug. 30-Sep. 6) as a control, adding an extra day to make up for
> > > Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).
> >
> > > Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10 of which
> > > mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession Index of
> > > 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the subject's OPs
> > > rose from 18 to 35 (up 94%). Even more dramatic was the rise in posts
> > > mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29 (up 190%), which
> > > gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.
> >
> > > Conclusion - I think these figures speak for themselves.
> > Again, I think this calls out for an update, since Jim Senetto is more unhinged than ever before.
> >
> > HTH and HAND.
> How typical. How

Whine much, Ash?

🙂

George J. Dance wrote:

>
> "Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep. 14, 2022

> It should be obvious to anyone reading the list that there has been a
> sharp increase in Jim Senetto's this past week. However, "obvious" isn't
> always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for statistical evidence, I
> decided to see what I could come up with.

> Methodology - I decided to limit myself to the subject's OPs, to
> eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will, or that simply
> quoted mentions of Will, neither of which is credible evidence of
> obsession. Using the Google feed,

> For the previous 7 days (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of OPs made
> by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, for the 7-day period
> Sept. 7-13 and used the latter as a percentage of the former to
> calculate the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the
> previous 8 days (Aug. 30-Sep. 6), adding an extra day to make up for
> Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).

> Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10 of which
> mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession Index of
> 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the subject's OPs
> nearly doubled, from 18 to 35. Even more dramatic was the rise in posts
> mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29, nearly triple. Which
> gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.

> I think these figures speak for themselves.

Looks like Senetto has decided to obsess over you for a while now, George.

🙂

George J. Dance wrote:

>
> "Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep. 14, 2022

> It should be obvious to anyone reading the list that there has been a
> sharp increase in Jim Senetto's this past week. However, "obvious" isn't
> always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for statistical evidence, I
> decided to see what I could come up with.

> Methodology - I decided to limit myself to the subject's OPs, to
> eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will, or that simply
> quoted mentions of Will, neither of which is credible evidence of
> obsession. Using the Google feed,

> For the previous 7 days (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of OPs made
> by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, for the 7-day period
> Sept. 7-13 and used the latter as a percentage of the former to
> calculate the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the
> previous 8 days (Aug. 30-Sep. 6), adding an extra day to make up for
> Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).

> Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10 of which
> mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession Index of
> 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the subject's OPs
> nearly doubled, from 18 to 35. Even more dramatic was the rise in posts
> mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29, nearly triple. Which
> gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.

> I think these figures speak for themselves.

As the numbers rise, to this day.

On Friday, June 16, 2023 at 7:20:55 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> On Thursday, June 15, 2023 at 3:55:53 AM UTC-4, Ash Wurthing wrote:
> > On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 9:45:11 PM UTC-4, W.Dockery wrote:
> > > George J. Dance wrote:
> > > >
> > > > (cleaned-up copy)
> > >
> > > > "Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep. 14, 2022
> > >
> > > > It should be obvious to anyone reading aapc that there has been a
> > > > sharp increase in Jim Senetto's Will Dockery Obsession this past week.
> > > > However, "obvious" isn't always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for
> > > > statistical evidence, I decided to see what I could come up with.
> > >
> > > > Methodology - I decided to use only the subject's OPs, to
> > > > eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will Dockery, or posts
> > > > quoted mentions of Will Dockery in the backthread (neither of which is
> > > > credible evidence of
> > > > obsession. Using the Google feed).
> > >
> > > > For the observation period (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of OPs made
> > > > by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, and used the latter
> > > > as a percentage of the former to calculate
> > > > the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the previous 8 days
> > > > (Aug. 30-Sep. 6) as a control, adding an extra day to make up for
> > > > Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).
> > >
> > > > Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10 of which
> > > > mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession Index of
> > > > 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the subject's OPs
> > > > rose from 18 to 35 (up 94%). Even more dramatic was the rise in posts
> > > > mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29 (up 190%), which
> > > > gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.
> > >
> > > > Conclusion - I think these figures speak for themselves.
> > > Again, I think this calls out for an update, since Jim Senetto is more unhinged than ever before.
> > >
> > > HTH and HAND.
> > How typical. How
> Whine much, Ash?

Nice "cool kid" bully talk. But then that's all you're good for any longer 'cause I see no fans of yours here...
Again I ask you, why do you bring your flame war from somewhere else to here to threaten the peace here? Why bury the work of other poets here with you and Dance's fighting and troll threads that belong elsewhere? Are there even any other poets here any longer for you to care about?