tsbr...@gmail.com wrote on 14/4/22 12:14 pm:
> On Friday, September 24, 2021 at 3:56:42 PM UTC-7, netk...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>> In article <1dd93fe2-a47c-4e70...@googlegroups.com>,
>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 3140, 3141, 3142, 3143 On Friday, September 24, 2021 at 7:35:39
>>> AM UTC-7, netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>> In article <eb1b8f56-e048-4634...@googlegroups.com>,
>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:

<Snip>

>>>>> Which the US Patent Office has issued patents for?
>>>> Do your own research!
>>>
>>> You said that some humor is patented, implying that the US
>>> Patent Office had issued patents!
>> You really are dense Tim!
>
> How can something be patented if a patent hasn't been issued for it?

Firstly, Tim, 'Doctor Who' is produced in Great Britain. Why would the
producers need to go to the U.S. of A. Patent Office??

Secondly, Tim, 'Doctor Who' is a T.V. show. Why would the producers need
to Patent anything??
--
Daniel

The Doctor wrote on 14/4/22 9:25 pm:
> In article <t3907v$4r9$1@dont-email.me>,
> Daniel65 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>> tsbr...@gmail.com wrote on 14/4/22 12:14 pm:
>>> On Friday, September 24, 2021 at 3:56:42 PM UTC-7, netk...@gmail.com
>>> wrote:
>>>> In article <1dd93fe2-a47c-4e70...@googlegroups.com>,
>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> 3140, 3141, 3142, 3143 On Friday, September 24, 2021 at 7:35:39
>>>>> AM UTC-7, netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>> In article <eb1b8f56-e048-4634...@googlegroups.com>,
>>>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> <Snip>
>>
>>>>>>> Which the US Patent Office has issued patents for?
>>>>>> Do your own research!
>>>>>
>>>>> You said that some humor is patented, implying that the US
>>>>> Patent Office had issued patents!
>>>> You really are dense Tim!
>>>
>>> How can something be patented if a patent hasn't been issued for it?
>>
>> Firstly, Tim, 'Doctor Who' is produced in Great Britain. Why would the
>> producers need to go to the U.S. of A. Patent Office??
>>
>> Secondly, Tim, 'Doctor Who' is a T.V. show. Why would the producers need
>> to Patent anything??
>
> We were addressing patented Humour.
>
> Nice Cut-and-lie, Dannyboy!

Please point out any 'lie' that YOU, clown, might think *I* have told as
part of my 'Cut-and-lie', clown!!

Oh! And by the way, clown .... (AKJV) Luke 6:42 Either how canst thou
say to thy brother, Brother, let me pull out the mote that is in thine
eye, when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then
shalt thou see clearly to pull out the mote that is in thy brother’s eye.
--
Daniel

The Doctor wrote on 16/4/22 12:12 am:
> In article <t3big6$nvq$2@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
> <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 14/4/22 9:25 pm:
>>> In article <t3907v$4r9$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>> <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com wrote on 14/4/22 12:14 pm:
>>>>> On Friday, September 24, 2021 at 3:56:42 PM UTC-7,
>>>>> netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>> In article <1dd93fe2-a47c-4e70...@googlegroups.com>,
>>>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> 3140, 3141, 3142, 3143 On Friday, September 24, 2021 at
>>>>>>> 7:35:39 AM UTC-7, netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>> In article <eb1b8f56-e048-4634...@googlegroups.com>,
>>>>>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> <Snip>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Which the US Patent Office has issued patents for?
>>>>>>>> Do your own research!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You said that some humor is patented, implying that the
>>>>>>> US Patent Office had issued patents!
>>>>>> You really are dense Tim!
>>>>>
>>>>> How can something be patented if a patent hasn't been issued
>>>>> for it?
>>>>
>>>> Firstly, Tim, 'Doctor Who' is produced in Great Britain. Why
>>>> would the producers need to go to the U.S. of A. Patent
>>>> Office??
>>>>
>>>> Secondly, Tim, 'Doctor Who' is a T.V. show. Why would the
>>>> producers need to Patent anything??
>>>
>>> We were addressing patented Humour.
>>>
>>> Nice Cut-and-lie, Dannyboy!
>>
>> Please point out any 'lie' that YOU, clown, might think *I* have
>> told as part of my 'Cut-and-lie', clown!!

> The <Snip> part.

No, clown, that is NOT A LIE, cause I did snip out a bit of the post
that I was replying to ..... like all good ISP's (or should that be
'NSP'??) might suggest one does, clown!!

But YOU're not a *good ISP or NSP* are YOU, clown, so one might not
expect YOU, clown, to be aware of this request, clown!!

Oh! And by the way, clown .... (AKJV) Luke 6:42 Either how canst thou
say to thy brother, Brother, let me pull out the mote that is in thine
eye, when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then
shalt thou see clearly to pull out the mote that is in thy brother’s eye.
--
Daniel

The Doctor wrote on 16/4/22 10:29 pm:
> In article <t3e847$dq9$1@dont-email.me>,
> Daniel65 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 16/4/22 12:12 am:
>>> In article <t3big6$nvq$2@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>> <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor wrote on 14/4/22 9:25 pm:
>>>>> In article <t3907v$4r9$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>>>> <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com wrote on 14/4/22 12:14 pm:
>>>>>>> On Friday, September 24, 2021 at 3:56:42 PM UTC-7,
>>>>>>> netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>> In article <1dd93fe2-a47c-4e70...@googlegroups.com>,
>>>>>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 3140, 3141, 3142, 3143 On Friday, September 24, 2021 at
>>>>>>>>> 7:35:39 AM UTC-7, netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> In article <eb1b8f56-e048-4634...@googlegroups.com>,
>>>>>>>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <Snip>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Which the US Patent Office has issued patents for?
>>>>>>>>>> Do your own research!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You said that some humor is patented, implying that the
>>>>>>>>> US Patent Office had issued patents!
>>>>>>>> You really are dense Tim!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> How can something be patented if a patent hasn't been issued
>>>>>>> for it?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Firstly, Tim, 'Doctor Who' is produced in Great Britain. Why
>>>>>> would the producers need to go to the U.S. of A. Patent
>>>>>> Office??
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Secondly, Tim, 'Doctor Who' is a T.V. show. Why would the
>>>>>> producers need to Patent anything??
>>>>>
>>>>> We were addressing patented Humour.
>>>>>
>>>>> Nice Cut-and-lie, Dannyboy!
>>>>
>>>> Please point out any 'lie' that YOU, clown, might think *I* have
>>>> told as part of my 'Cut-and-lie', clown!!
>>
>>
>>> The <Snip> part.
>>
>> No, clown, that is NOT A LIE, cause I did snip out a bit of the post
>> that I was replying to ..... like all good ISP's (or should that be
>> 'NSP'??) might suggest one does, clown!!
>>
>> But YOU're not a *good ISP or NSP* are YOU, clown, so one might not
>> expect YOU, clown, to be aware of this request, clown!!

> That is dishonest on your part, Dannyboy!

What is dishonest about what I typed, clown??

Oh! And by the way, clown .... (AKJV) Luke 6:42 Either how canst thou
say to thy brother, Brother, let me pull out the mote that is in thine
eye, when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then
shalt thou see clearly to pull out the mote that is in thy brother’s eye.
--
Daniel

The Doctor wrote on 16/4/22 11:05 pm:
> In article <t3edr9$ke1$1@dont-email.me>,
> Daniel65 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 16/4/22 10:29 pm:
>>> In article <t3e847$dq9$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> Daniel65 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor wrote on 16/4/22 12:12 am:
>>>>> In article <t3big6$nvq$2@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>>>> <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>>>>> The Doctor wrote on 14/4/22 9:25 pm:
>>>>>>> In article <t3907v$4r9$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>>>>>> <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com wrote on 14/4/22 12:14 pm:
>>>>>>>>> On Friday, September 24, 2021 at 3:56:42 PM UTC-7,
>>>>>>>>> netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> In article <1dd93fe2-a47c-4e70...@googlegroups.com>,
>>>>>>>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> 3140, 3141, 3142, 3143 On Friday, September 24, 2021 at
>>>>>>>>>>> 7:35:39 AM UTC-7, netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <eb1b8f56-e048-4634...@googlegroups.com>,
>>>>>>>>>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> <Snip>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Which the US Patent Office has issued patents for?
>>>>>>>>>>>> Do your own research!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You said that some humor is patented, implying that the
>>>>>>>>>>> US Patent Office had issued patents!
>>>>>>>>>> You really are dense Tim!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> How can something be patented if a patent hasn't been issued
>>>>>>>>> for it?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Firstly, Tim, 'Doctor Who' is produced in Great Britain. Why
>>>>>>>> would the producers need to go to the U.S. of A. Patent
>>>>>>>> Office??
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Secondly, Tim, 'Doctor Who' is a T.V. show. Why would the
>>>>>>>> producers need to Patent anything??
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We were addressing patented Humour.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nice Cut-and-lie, Dannyboy!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please point out any 'lie' that YOU, clown, might think *I* have
>>>>>> told as part of my 'Cut-and-lie', clown!!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> The <Snip> part.
>>>>
>>>> No, clown, that is NOT A LIE, cause I did snip out a bit of the post
>>>> that I was replying to ..... like all good ISP's (or should that be
>>>> 'NSP'??) might suggest one does, clown!!
>>>>
>>>> But YOU're not a *good ISP or NSP* are YOU, clown, so one might not
>>>> expect YOU, clown, to be aware of this request, clown!!
>>
>>
>>> That is dishonest on your part, Dannyboy!
>>
>> What is dishonest about what I typed, clown??

> By cutting the context , Dannyboy!

What 'context' did I cut, clown??

I'd left seven or eight responses prior to my response, clown! That
should give any reasonable reader a fair bit of the context of the
discussion that I was responding to, clown!!

Oh! And by the way, clown .... (AKJV) Luke 6:42 Either how canst thou
say to thy brother, Brother, let me pull out the mote that is in thine
eye, when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then
shalt thou see clearly to pull out the mote that is in thy brother’s eye.
--
Daniel

The Doctor wrote on 17/4/22 9:19 pm:
> In article <t3gmkf$al0$1@dont-email.me>,
> Daniel65 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 16/4/22 11:05 pm:
>>> In article <t3edr9$ke1$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> Daniel65 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor wrote on 16/4/22 10:29 pm:
>>>>> In article <t3e847$dq9$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> Daniel65 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>>>>> The Doctor wrote on 16/4/22 12:12 am:
>>>>>>> In article <t3big6$nvq$2@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>>>>>> <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>> The Doctor wrote on 14/4/22 9:25 pm:
>>>>>>>>> In article <t3907v$4r9$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>>>>>>>> <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com wrote on 14/4/22 12:14 pm:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, September 24, 2021 at 3:56:42 PM UTC-7,
>>>>>>>>>>> netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <1dd93fe2-a47c-4e70...@googlegroups.com>,
>>>>>>>>>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3140, 3141, 3142, 3143 On Friday, September 24, 2021 at
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7:35:39 AM UTC-7, netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <eb1b8f56-e048-4634...@googlegroups.com>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> <Snip>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Which the US Patent Office has issued patents for?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do your own research!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You said that some humor is patented, implying that the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> US Patent Office had issued patents!
>>>>>>>>>>>> You really are dense Tim!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> How can something be patented if a patent hasn't been issued
>>>>>>>>>>> for it?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Firstly, Tim, 'Doctor Who' is produced in Great Britain. Why
>>>>>>>>>> would the producers need to go to the U.S. of A. Patent
>>>>>>>>>> Office??
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Secondly, Tim, 'Doctor Who' is a T.V. show. Why would the
>>>>>>>>>> producers need to Patent anything??
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> We were addressing patented Humour.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Nice Cut-and-lie, Dannyboy!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Please point out any 'lie' that YOU, clown, might think *I* have
>>>>>>>> told as part of my 'Cut-and-lie', clown!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The <Snip> part.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No, clown, that is NOT A LIE, cause I did snip out a bit of the post
>>>>>> that I was replying to ..... like all good ISP's (or should that be
>>>>>> 'NSP'??) might suggest one does, clown!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But YOU're not a *good ISP or NSP* are YOU, clown, so one might not
>>>>>> expect YOU, clown, to be aware of this request, clown!!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> That is dishonest on your part, Dannyboy!
>>>>
>>>> What is dishonest about what I typed, clown??
>>
>>
>>> By cutting the context , Dannyboy!
>>
>> What 'context' did I cut, clown??
>>
>> I'd left seven or eight responses prior to my response, clown! That
>> should give any reasonable reader a fair bit of the context of the
>> discussion that I was responding to, clown!!
>
> Dan's definition of clown comes from
> http://www.chakoteya.net/DoctorWho/10-1.htm
>
> JO: Look.
> (The scanner shows William inside a pyramid shape. He was too ill to act, bless
> him.)
> DOCTOR 1: [on scanner] Ah, there you are. I seem to be stuck up here. Hmm? Hmm?
> Oh, so you're my replacements. Huh. A dandy and a clown. Have you done anything?
> DOCTOR 2: Well, we've, er, assessed the situation.
> DOCTOR 1 [on scanner]: Just as I thought. Nothing.
> DOCTOR: Well it's not easy, you know.
>
> Get out of chronic hysteresis mode Dannyboy!
>
> So do you know of the original post?

Well, clown, the original post, as showing in my Newsreader was posted on

Injection-Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 00:32:42 +0000
From: TB <tsbrueni@dcn.davis.ca.us>

but, even that post quotes posts by 'Duggy', YOU, 'China Blue Veins' and
Wouter Valentijn before that, clown

The Original Post, by Wouter, was ....
Quote
> You see an alien and then you forgot you saw it.

Shades of Glory = Ben, but I forgive them.
End Quote.

so someone had posted before Wouter, clown.

Anything else I can help YOU, clown, with??

Oh! And by the way, clown .... (AKJV) Luke 6:42 Either how canst thou
say to thy brother, Brother, let me pull out the mote that is in thine
eye, when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then
shalt thou see clearly to pull out the mote that is in thy brother’s eye.
--
Daniel

The Doctor wrote on 18/4/22 6:39 am:
> In article <t3h2p9$qtk$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
> <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 17/4/22 9:19 pm:
>>> In article <t3gmkf$al0$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>> <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor wrote on 16/4/22 11:05 pm:
>>>>> In article <t3edr9$ke1$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>>>> <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>>>>> The Doctor wrote on 16/4/22 10:29 pm:
>>>>>>> In article <t3e847$dq9$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>>>>>> <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>> The Doctor wrote on 16/4/22 12:12 am:
>>>>>>>>> In article <t3big6$nvq$2@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>>>>>>>> <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> The Doctor wrote on 14/4/22 9:25 pm:
>>>>>>>>>>> In article <t3907v$4r9$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>>>>> Daniel65 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com wrote on 14/4/22 12:14 pm:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, September 24, 2021 at 3:56:42 PM
>>>>>>>>>>>>> UTC-7, netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <1dd93fe2-a47c-4e70...@googlegroups.com>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3140, 3141, 3142, 3143 On Friday,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> September 24, 2021 at 7:35:39 AM UTC-7,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <eb1b8f56-e048-4634...@googlegroups.com>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <Snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Which the US Patent Office has issued
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> patents for?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do your own research!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You said that some humor is patented,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> implying that the US Patent Office had
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issued patents!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You really are dense Tim!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> How can something be patented if a patent
>>>>>>>>>>>>> hasn't been issued for it?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Firstly, Tim, 'Doctor Who' is produced in Great
>>>>>>>>>>>> Britain. Why would the producers need to go to
>>>>>>>>>>>> the U.S. of A. Patent Office??
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Secondly, Tim, 'Doctor Who' is a T.V. show. Why
>>>>>>>>>>>> would the producers need to Patent anything??
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> We were addressing patented Humour.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Nice Cut-and-lie, Dannyboy!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Please point out any 'lie' that YOU, clown, might
>>>>>>>>>> think *I* have told as part of my 'Cut-and-lie',
>>>>>>>>>> clown!!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The <Snip> part.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No, clown, that is NOT A LIE, cause I did snip out a
>>>>>>>> bit of the post that I was replying to ..... like all
>>>>>>>> good ISP's (or should that be 'NSP'??) might suggest
>>>>>>>> one does, clown!!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> But YOU're not a *good ISP or NSP* are YOU, clown, so
>>>>>>>> one might not expect YOU, clown, to be aware of this
>>>>>>>> request, clown!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That is dishonest on your part, Dannyboy!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What is dishonest about what I typed, clown??
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> By cutting the context , Dannyboy!
>>>>
>>>> What 'context' did I cut, clown??
>>>>
>>>> I'd left seven or eight responses prior to my response, clown!
>>>> That should give any reasonable reader a fair bit of the
>>>> context of the discussion that I was responding to, clown!!
>>>
>>> Dan's definition of clown comes from
>>> http://www.chakoteya.net/DoctorWho/10-1.htm
>>>
>>> JO: Look. (The scanner shows William inside a pyramid shape. He
>>> was too ill to
>> act, bless
>>> him.) DOCTOR 1: [on scanner] Ah, there you are. I seem to be
>>> stuck up here.
>> Hmm? Hmm?
>>> Oh, so you're my replacements. Huh. A dandy and a clown. Have you
>>> done
>> anything?
>>> DOCTOR 2: Well, we've, er, assessed the situation. DOCTOR 1 [on
>>> scanner]: Just as I thought. Nothing. DOCTOR: Well it's not easy,
>>> you know.
>>>
>>> Get out of chronic hysteresis mode Dannyboy!
>>>
>>> So do you know of the original post?
>>
>> Well, clown, the original post, as showing in my Newsreader was
>> posted on
>>
>> Injection-Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 00:32:42 +0000 From: TB
>> <tsbrueni@dcn.davis.ca.us>
>>
>> but, even that post quotes posts by 'Duggy', YOU, 'China Blue
>> Veins' and Wouter Valentijn before that, clown
>>
>> The Original Post, by Wouter, was .... Quote
>>> You see an alien and then you forgot you saw it.
>>
>> Shades of Glory = Ben, but I forgive them. End Quote.
>>
>> so someone had posted before Wouter, clown.
>>
>> Anything else I can help YOU, clown, with??

> Proof of Tim's spamtrolling all right, Dannyboy.

Sorry!! WHAT?? What 'spamtrolling', clown??

Oh! And by the way, clown .... (AKJV) Luke 6:42 Either how canst thou
say to thy brother, Brother, let me pull out the mote that is in thine
eye, when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then
shalt thou see clearly to pull out the mote that is in thy brother’s eye.
--
Daniel

The Doctor wrote on 19/4/22 12:22 am:
> In article <t3jg3f$7n2$3@dont-email.me>,
> Daniel65 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 18/4/22 6:39 am:
>>> In article <t3h2p9$qtk$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>> <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor wrote on 17/4/22 9:19 pm:
>>>>> In article <t3gmkf$al0$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>>>> <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>>>>> The Doctor wrote on 16/4/22 11:05 pm:
>>>>>>> In article <t3edr9$ke1$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>>>>>> <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>> The Doctor wrote on 16/4/22 10:29 pm:
>>>>>>>>> In article <t3e847$dq9$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>>>>>>>> <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> The Doctor wrote on 16/4/22 12:12 am:
>>>>>>>>>>> In article <t3big6$nvq$2@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>>>>>>>>>> <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> The Doctor wrote on 14/4/22 9:25 pm:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <t3907v$4r9$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Daniel65 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com wrote on 14/4/22 12:14 pm:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, September 24, 2021 at 3:56:42 PM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UTC-7, netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <1dd93fe2-a47c-4e70...@googlegroups.com>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3140, 3141, 3142, 3143 On Friday,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> September 24, 2021 at 7:35:39 AM UTC-7,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <eb1b8f56-e048-4634...@googlegroups.com>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <Snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Which the US Patent Office has issued
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> patents for?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do your own research!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You said that some humor is patented,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> implying that the US Patent Office had
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issued patents!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You really are dense Tim!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How can something be patented if a patent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hasn't been issued for it?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Firstly, Tim, 'Doctor Who' is produced in Great
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Britain. Why would the producers need to go to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the U.S. of A. Patent Office??
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Secondly, Tim, 'Doctor Who' is a T.V. show. Why
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would the producers need to Patent anything??
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> We were addressing patented Humour.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nice Cut-and-lie, Dannyboy!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Please point out any 'lie' that YOU, clown, might
>>>>>>>>>>>> think *I* have told as part of my 'Cut-and-lie',
>>>>>>>>>>>> clown!!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The <Snip> part.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> No, clown, that is NOT A LIE, cause I did snip out a
>>>>>>>>>> bit of the post that I was replying to ..... like all
>>>>>>>>>> good ISP's (or should that be 'NSP'??) might suggest
>>>>>>>>>> one does, clown!!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> But YOU're not a *good ISP or NSP* are YOU, clown, so
>>>>>>>>>> one might not expect YOU, clown, to be aware of this
>>>>>>>>>> request, clown!!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That is dishonest on your part, Dannyboy!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What is dishonest about what I typed, clown??
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> By cutting the context , Dannyboy!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What 'context' did I cut, clown??
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'd left seven or eight responses prior to my response, clown!
>>>>>> That should give any reasonable reader a fair bit of the
>>>>>> context of the discussion that I was responding to, clown!!

>>>>> So do you know of the original post?
>>>>
>>>> Well, clown, the original post, as showing in my Newsreader was
>>>> posted on
>>>>
>>>> Injection-Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 00:32:42 +0000 From: TB
>>>> <tsbrueni@dcn.davis.ca.us>
>>>>
>>>> but, even that post quotes posts by 'Duggy', YOU, 'China Blue
>>>> Veins' and Wouter Valentijn before that, clown
>>>>
>>>> The Original Post, by Wouter, was .... Quote
>>>>> You see an alien and then you forgot you saw it.
>>>>
>>>> Shades of Glory = Ben, but I forgive them. End Quote.
>>>>
>>>> so someone had posted before Wouter, clown.
>>>>
>>>> Anything else I can help YOU, clown, with??
>>
>>
>>> Proof of Tim's spamtrolling all right, Dannyboy.
>>
>> Sorry!! WHAT?? What 'spamtrolling', clown??

> spamtroilling based on taking a thread of the self
> after a long time, Dannyboy.

"thread of the self"?? WHAT THE F??

What's the time limit for responding to a post, clown??

If there is such a time limit, were is it posted, clown??

Oh! And by the way, clown .... (AKJV) Luke 6:42 Either how canst thou
say to thy brother, Brother, let me pull out the mote that is in thine
eye, when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then
shalt thou see clearly to pull out the mote that is in thy brother’s eye.
--
Daniel

The Doctor wrote on 19/4/22 11:39 pm:
> In article <t3m0co$5br$1@dont-email.me>,
> Daniel65 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 19/4/22 12:22 am:
>>> In article <t3jg3f$7n2$3@dont-email.me>,
>>> Daniel65 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor wrote on 18/4/22 6:39 am:
>>>>> In article <t3h2p9$qtk$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>>>> <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>>>>> The Doctor wrote on 17/4/22 9:19 pm:
>>>>>>> In article <t3gmkf$al0$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>>>>>> <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>> The Doctor wrote on 16/4/22 11:05 pm:
>>>>>>>>> In article <t3edr9$ke1$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>>>>>>>> <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> The Doctor wrote on 16/4/22 10:29 pm:
>>>>>>>>>>> In article <t3e847$dq9$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>>>>>>>>>> <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> The Doctor wrote on 16/4/22 12:12 am:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <t3big6$nvq$2@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Doctor wrote on 14/4/22 9:25 pm:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <t3907v$4r9$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Daniel65 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com wrote on 14/4/22 12:14 pm:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, September 24, 2021 at 3:56:42 PM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UTC-7, netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <1dd93fe2-a47c-4e70...@googlegroups.com>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3140, 3141, 3142, 3143 On Friday,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> September 24, 2021 at 7:35:39 AM UTC-7,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <eb1b8f56-e048-4634...@googlegroups.com>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <Snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Which the US Patent Office has issued
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> patents for?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do your own research!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You said that some humor is patented,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> implying that the US Patent Office had
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issued patents!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You really are dense Tim!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How can something be patented if a patent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hasn't been issued for it?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Firstly, Tim, 'Doctor Who' is produced in Great
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Britain. Why would the producers need to go to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the U.S. of A. Patent Office??
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Secondly, Tim, 'Doctor Who' is a T.V. show. Why
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would the producers need to Patent anything??
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We were addressing patented Humour.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nice Cut-and-lie, Dannyboy!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please point out any 'lie' that YOU, clown, might
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think *I* have told as part of my 'Cut-and-lie',
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clown!!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The <Snip> part.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> No, clown, that is NOT A LIE, cause I did snip out a
>>>>>>>>>>>> bit of the post that I was replying to ..... like all
>>>>>>>>>>>> good ISP's (or should that be 'NSP'??) might suggest
>>>>>>>>>>>> one does, clown!!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> But YOU're not a *good ISP or NSP* are YOU, clown, so
>>>>>>>>>>>> one might not expect YOU, clown, to be aware of this
>>>>>>>>>>>> request, clown!!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> That is dishonest on your part, Dannyboy!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> What is dishonest about what I typed, clown??
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> By cutting the context , Dannyboy!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What 'context' did I cut, clown??
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'd left seven or eight responses prior to my response, clown!
>>>>>>>> That should give any reasonable reader a fair bit of the
>>>>>>>> context of the discussion that I was responding to, clown!!
>>
>>
>>>>>>> So do you know of the original post?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Well, clown, the original post, as showing in my Newsreader was
>>>>>> posted on
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Injection-Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 00:32:42 +0000 From: TB
>>>>>> <tsbrueni@dcn.davis.ca.us>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> but, even that post quotes posts by 'Duggy', YOU, 'China Blue
>>>>>> Veins' and Wouter Valentijn before that, clown
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The Original Post, by Wouter, was .... Quote
>>>>>>> You see an alien and then you forgot you saw it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Shades of Glory = Ben, but I forgive them. End Quote.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> so someone had posted before Wouter, clown.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Anything else I can help YOU, clown, with??
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Proof of Tim's spamtrolling all right, Dannyboy.
>>>>
>>>> Sorry!! WHAT?? What 'spamtrolling', clown??
>>
>>
>>> spamtroilling based on taking a thread of the shelf
>>> after a long time, Dannyboy.
>>
>> "thread of the shelf"?? WHAT THE F??
>>
>> What's the time limit for responding to a post, clown??
>>
>> If there is such a time limit, were is it posted, clown??

tsbru...@gmail.com wrote on 20/04/2022 9:55 pm:
> On Tuesday, April 19, 2022 at 6:39:46 AM UTC-7, netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>> In article <t3m0co$5br$1...@dont-email.me>,
>> Daniel65 <dani...@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>> The Doctor wrote on 19/4/22 12:22 am:

<Snip>

>>>> spamtroilling based on taking a thread of the shelf
>>>> after a long time, Dannyboy.
>>>
>>> "thread of the shelf"?? WHAT THE F??
>>>
>>> What's the time limit for responding to a post, clown??
>>>
>>> If there is such a time limit, were is it posted, clown??
>> 14 days should be good enough. Vacationers, you know!
>
> Not enough time for the spoiler time to end!

Yeah!! That's a good reason, Tim. The clown can't argue with that can he??
--
Daniel

The Doctor wrote on 19/04/2022 11:39 pm:
> In article <t3m0co$5br$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
> <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 19/4/22 12:22 am:
>>> In article <t3jg3f$7n2$3@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>> <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor wrote on 18/4/22 6:39 am:
>>>>> In article <t3h2p9$qtk$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>>>> <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>>>>> The Doctor wrote on 17/4/22 9:19 pm:

<Snip>

>>>>>>> So do you know of the original post?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Well, clown, the original post, as showing in my Newsreader
>>>>>> was posted on
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Injection-Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 00:32:42 +0000 From: TB
>>>>>> <tsbrueni@dcn.davis.ca.us>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> but, even that post quotes posts by 'Duggy', YOU, 'China
>>>>>> Blue Veins' and Wouter Valentijn before that, clown
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The Original Post, by Wouter, was .... Quote
>>>>>>> You see an alien and then you forgot you saw it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Shades of Glory = Ben, but I forgive them. End Quote.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> so someone had posted before Wouter, clown.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Anything else I can help YOU, clown, with??
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Proof of Tim's spamtrolling all right, Dannyboy.
>>>>
>>>> Sorry!! WHAT?? What 'spamtrolling', clown??
>>
>>
>>> spamtroilling based on taking a thread of the shelf after a long
>>> time, Dannyboy.
>>
>> "thread of the shelf"?? WHAT THE F??
>>
>> What's the time limit for responding to a post, clown??
>>
>> If there is such a time limit, were is it posted, clown??

> 14 days should be good enough. Vacationers, you know!

Well, clown, if that's the case AND YOU, clown, and Aggy think 'Doctor
Who' finished in 2017, that 14 days limit would have well and truly
passed, clown, so why are YOU, clown, posting here at all, clown??

Or, deep down, do YOU, clown, really think 'Doctor Who' is an ongoing
T.V. series, clown??

Oh! And by the way, clown .... (AKJV) Luke 6:42 Either how canst thou
say to thy brother, Brother, let me pull out the mote that is in thine
eye, when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then
shalt thou see clearly to pull out the mote that is in thy brother’s eye.
--
Daniel

The Doctor wrote on 21/4/22 12:18 am:
> In article <t3of6f$agh$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
> <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 19/4/22 11:39 pm:
>>> In article <t3m0co$5br$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>> <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:

<Snip>

>>>> What's the time limit for responding to a post, clown??
>>>>
>>>> If there is such a time limit, were is it posted, clown??
>>
>>
>>> 14 days should be good enough. Vacationers, you know!
>>
>> Oh!! So this is something YOU, clown, have just come up with, is
>> it, clown??
>>
>> Well, guess what authority THAT has on UseNet, clown??

> Ever took a vacation, Dannyboy?

WOW!! What a twist!! That must just about be a
Triple-Somersault-with-double-poke!!

Still, it's a post so added to your Precious Post Count, clown!!

Oh! And by the way, clown .... (AKJV) Luke 6:42 Either how canst thou
say to thy brother, Brother, let me pull out the mote that is in thine
eye, when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then
shalt thou see clearly to pull out the mote that is in thy brother’s eye.
--
Daniel

The Doctor wrote on 21/4/22 12:28 am:
> In article <t3otvh$r0k$1@dont-email.me>,
> Daniel65 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 19/04/2022 11:39 pm:
>>> In article <t3m0co$5br$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>> <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor wrote on 19/4/22 12:22 am:
>>>>> In article <t3jg3f$7n2$3@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>>>> <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>>>>> The Doctor wrote on 18/4/22 6:39 am:
>>>>>>> In article <t3h2p9$qtk$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>>>>>> <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>> The Doctor wrote on 17/4/22 9:19 pm:
>>
>> <Snip>
>>
>>>>>>>>> So do you know of the original post?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Well, clown, the original post, as showing in my Newsreader
>>>>>>>> was posted on
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Injection-Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 00:32:42 +0000 From: TB
>>>>>>>> <tsbrueni@dcn.davis.ca.us>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> but, even that post quotes posts by 'Duggy', YOU, 'China
>>>>>>>> Blue Veins' and Wouter Valentijn before that, clown
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The Original Post, by Wouter, was .... Quote
>>>>>>>>> You see an alien and then you forgot you saw it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Shades of Glory = Ben, but I forgive them. End Quote.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> so someone had posted before Wouter, clown.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Anything else I can help YOU, clown, with??
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Proof of Tim's spamtrolling all right, Dannyboy.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sorry!! WHAT?? What 'spamtrolling', clown??
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> spamtroilling based on taking a thread of the shelf after a long
>>>>> time, Dannyboy.
>>>>
>>>> "thread of the shelf"?? WHAT THE F??
>>>>
>>>> What's the time limit for responding to a post, clown??
>>>>
>>>> If there is such a time limit, were is it posted, clown??
>>
>>
>>> 14 days should be good enough. Vacationers, you know!
>>
>> Well, clown, if that's the case AND YOU, clown, and Aggy think 'Doctor
>> Who' finished in 2017, that 14 days limit would have well and truly
>> passed, clown, so why are YOU, clown, posting here at all, clown??
>>
>> Or, deep down, do YOU, clown, really think 'Doctor Who' is an ongoing
>> T.V. series, clown??

> Only if The Timeless child is retconned.

> Otherwise DW is doomed to failure!

Neither of those two statements go anywhere near answering EITHER of my
questions, clown!!

But, still, it's a post so added to your Precious Post Count, clown!!

Oh! And by the way, clown .... (AKJV) Luke 6:42 Either how canst thou
say to thy brother, Brother, let me pull out the mote that is in thine
eye, when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then
shalt thou see clearly to pull out the mote that is in thy brother’s eye.
--
Daniel

The Doctor wrote on 21/4/22 9:30 pm:
> In article <t3re0p$bs1$1@dont-email.me>,
> Daniel65 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 21/4/22 12:18 am:
>>> In article <t3of6f$agh$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>> <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor wrote on 19/4/22 11:39 pm:
>>>>> In article <t3m0co$5br$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>>>> <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>
>> <Snip>
>>
>>>>>> What's the time limit for responding to a post, clown??
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If there is such a time limit, were is it posted, clown??
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> 14 days should be good enough. Vacationers, you know!
>>>>
>>>> Oh!! So this is something YOU, clown, have just come up with, is
>>>> it, clown??
>>>>
>>>> Well, guess what authority THAT has on UseNet, clown??
>>
>>
>>> Ever took a vacation, Dannyboy?
>>
>> WOW!! What a twist!! That must just about be a
>> Triple-Somersault-with-double-poke!!
>>
>> Still, it's a post so added to your Precious Post Count, clown!

> Ever took a vacation, Dannyboy?

> WOW!! What a twist!! That must just about be a
> Triple-Somersault-with-double-pike!!
>
> Still, it's a post so added to your Precious Post Count, clown!!

Oh! And by the way, clown .... (AKJV) Luke 6:42 Either how canst thou
say to thy brother, Brother, let me pull out the mote that is in thine
eye, when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then
shalt thou see clearly to pull out the mote that is in thy brother’s eye.
--
Daniel

The Doctor wrote on 21/4/22 9:32 pm:
> In article <t3re7q$dgm$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
> <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 21/4/22 12:28 am:
>>> In article <t3otvh$r0k$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>> <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor wrote on 19/04/2022 11:39 pm:
>>>>> In article <t3m0co$5br$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>>>> <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>>>>> The Doctor wrote on 19/4/22 12:22 am:
>>>>>>> In article <t3jg3f$7n2$3@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>>>>>> <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>> The Doctor wrote on 18/4/22 6:39 am:
>>>>>>>>> In article <t3h2p9$qtk$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>>>>>>>> <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> The Doctor wrote on 17/4/22 9:19 pm:
>>>>
>>>> <Snip>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> So do you know of the original post?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Well, clown, the original post, as showing in my
>>>>>>>>>> Newsreader was posted on
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Injection-Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 00:32:42 +0000
>>>>>>>>>> From: TB <tsbrueni@dcn.davis.ca.us>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> but, even that post quotes posts by 'Duggy', YOU,
>>>>>>>>>> 'China Blue Veins' and Wouter Valentijn before
>>>>>>>>>> that, clown
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The Original Post, by Wouter, was .... Quote
>>>>>>>>>>> You see an alien and then you forgot you saw it.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Shades of Glory = Ben, but I forgive them. End
>>>>>>>>>> Quote.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> so someone had posted before Wouter, clown.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Anything else I can help YOU, clown, with??
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Proof of Tim's spamtrolling all right, Dannyboy.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sorry!! WHAT?? What 'spamtrolling', clown??
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> spamtroilling based on taking a thread of the shelf after
>>>>>>> a long time, Dannyboy.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "thread of the shelf"?? WHAT THE F??
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What's the time limit for responding to a post, clown??
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If there is such a time limit, were is it posted, clown??
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> 14 days should be good enough. Vacationers, you know!
>>>>
>>>> Well, clown, if that's the case AND YOU, clown, and Aggy think
>>>> 'Doctor Who' finished in 2017, that 14 days limit would have
>>>> well and truly passed, clown, so why are YOU, clown, posting
>>>> here at all, clown??
>>>>
>>>> Or, deep down, do YOU, clown, really think 'Doctor Who' is an
>>>> ongoing T.V. series, clown??
>>
>>
>>> Only if The Timeless child is retconned.
>>
>>> Otherwise DW is doomed to failure!
>>
>> Neither of those two statements go anywhere near answering EITHER
>> of my questions, clown!!
>>
>> But, still, it's a post so added to your Precious Post Count,
>> clown!!

> Doctor Who is not popular with the Timeless Child running rampant,
> Dannyboy!

Children running rampant is never popular, clown!

But, still, it's a post so added to your Precious Post Count, clown!!

Oh! And by the way, clown .... (AKJV) Luke 6:42 Either how canst thou
say to thy brother, Brother, let me pull out the mote that is in thine
eye, when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then
shalt thou see clearly to pull out the mote that is in thy brother’s eye.
--
Daniel