Watching "Doctor Who: Legend of the Sea Devils" tonight, I noticed, for
the first time I think, that The Doctor is aware of Yaz's feelings for her.

Mind you, I haven't particularly been looking for this interaction, it
was mainly though reading here that I became aware of Yaz's feelings for
The Doctor until Dan starting asking/advising Yaz about her feelings!!

Tonight, whilst watching, I started thinking .... "Is this why Yads has
hated these JodyDoc Series so much ..... cause he cottoned on to this
relationship very early on?? VERY, very, early on!"

I mean, knowing what a solid Christian the clown is, he might have
'dis'd' these series for this reason alone, from the very start!!
--
Daniel

"Daniel65" <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote in message
news:t3jjp8$4io$1@dont-email.me...
> Watching "Doctor Who: Legend of the Sea Devils" tonight, I noticed, for
> the first time I think, that The Doctor is aware of Yaz's feelings for
> her.
>
> Mind you, I haven't particularly been looking for this interaction, it was
> mainly though reading here that I became aware of Yaz's feelings for The
> Doctor until Dan starting asking/advising Yaz about her feelings!!
>
> Tonight, whilst watching, I started thinking .... "Is this why Yads has
> hated these JodyDoc Series so much ..... cause he cottoned on to this
> relationship very early on?? VERY, very, early on!"
>
> I mean, knowing what a solid Christian the clown is, he might have 'dis'd'
> these series for this reason alone, from the very start!!

Yads doesn't like any of that icky sex stuff. No matter that Susan was the
Doctor's granddaughter. Somehow he had grandchildren without ever having sex
himself. Or if he did have sex once, he's not allowed to have sex with
anyone ever again. Or anything approaching sexual feelings.

Yads only started hating Doctor Who because he was copying Aggy. Aggy and
Yads both hate the idea of sex. I think their real hatred began with
Gridlock. I can't remember exactly what set them off. I think there was a
couple called Valerie (a human) and Thomas (a Catkind) and they had
children. Which Aggy (and hence Yads) decided was bestiality. And then at
the end they played the Old Rugged Cross which Yads also thought was
sacrilege. So it's all been downhill for Aggy and Yads ever since.

Although it may have started sooner when they realised Captain Jack wasn't
entirely straight...

"The Other Doctor" <stephen.wilson2004nospam@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:t3jlr3$jmf$1@dont-email.me...
>
> "Daniel65" <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote in message
> news:t3jjp8$4io$1@dont-email.me...
>> Watching "Doctor Who: Legend of the Sea Devils" tonight, I noticed, for
>> the first time I think, that The Doctor is aware of Yaz's feelings for
>> her.
>>
>> Mind you, I haven't particularly been looking for this interaction, it
>> was mainly though reading here that I became aware of Yaz's feelings for
>> The Doctor until Dan starting asking/advising Yaz about her feelings!!
>>
>> Tonight, whilst watching, I started thinking .... "Is this why Yads has
>> hated these JodyDoc Series so much ..... cause he cottoned on to this
>> relationship very early on?? VERY, very, early on!"
>>
>> I mean, knowing what a solid Christian the clown is, he might have
>> 'dis'd' these series for this reason alone, from the very start!!
>
> Yads doesn't like any of that icky sex stuff. No matter that Susan was the
> Doctor's granddaughter. Somehow he had grandchildren without ever having
> sex himself. Or if he did have sex once, he's not allowed to have sex with
> anyone ever again. Or anything approaching sexual feelings.
>
> Yads only started hating Doctor Who because he was copying Aggy. Aggy and
> Yads both hate the idea of sex. I think their real hatred began with
> Gridlock. I can't remember exactly what set them off. I think there was a
> couple called Valerie (a human) and Thomas (a Catkind) and they had
> children. Which Aggy (and hence Yads) decided was bestiality. And then at
> the end they played the Old Rugged Cross which Yads also thought was
> sacrilege. So it's all been downhill for Aggy and Yads ever since.
>
> Although it may have started sooner when they realised Captain Jack wasn't
> entirely straight...

Which reminds me - back in 2005 there was a 2 parter written by Moffat which
suggested the Doctor had sex. The Empty Child/The Doctor Dances. "Dancing"
was a euphemism. Every time anyone danced, it really meant they were having
sex. There were also various other sexual references. Of course, this was
all a bit too subtle for Aggy and Yads so whooshed right over their heads.

The Other Doctor wrote on 18/4/22 10:34 pm:
> "Daniel65" <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote in message
> news:t3jjp8$4io$1@dont-email.me...
>> Watching "Doctor Who: Legend of the Sea Devils" tonight, I noticed,
>> for the first time I think, that The Doctor is aware of Yaz's
>> feelings for her.
>>
>> Mind you, I haven't particularly been looking for this interaction,
>> it was mainly though reading here that I became aware of Yaz's
>> feelings for The Doctor until Dan starting asking/advising Yaz
>> about her feelings!!
>>
>> Tonight, whilst watching, I started thinking .... "Is this why Yads
>> has hated these JodyDoc Series so much ..... cause he cottoned on
>> to this relationship very early on?? VERY, very, early on!"
>>
>> I mean, knowing what a solid Christian the clown is, he might have
>> 'dis'd' these series for this reason alone, from the very start!!
>
> Yads doesn't like any of that icky sex stuff. No matter that Susan
> was the Doctor's granddaughter. Somehow he had grandchildren without
> ever having sex himself. Or if he did have sex once, he's not allowed
> to have sex with anyone ever again. Or anything approaching sexual
> feelings.
>
> Yads only started hating Doctor Who because he was copying Aggy. Aggy
> and Yads both hate the idea of sex. I think their real hatred began
> with Gridlock. I can't remember exactly what set them off. I think
> there was a couple called Valerie (a human) and Thomas (a Catkind)
> and they had children.

And wasn't there a couple of older Women in one of the cars?? Were they
the pair keeping track of all the others!!

Two Women together in a confined space!! We can't have that, can we??

> Which Aggy (and hence Yads) decided was
> bestiality. And then at the end they played the Old Rugged Cross
> which Yads also thought was sacrilege. So it's all been downhill for
> Aggy and Yads ever since.
>
> Although it may have started sooner when they realised Captain Jack
> wasn't entirely straight...

OmniSexual, I think was the term they used!!
--
Daniel

Daniel65 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
> Watching "Doctor Who: Legend of the Sea Devils" tonight, I noticed, for
> the first time I think, that The Doctor is aware of Yaz's feelings for her.
>
> Mind you, I haven't particularly been looking for this interaction, it
> was mainly though reading here that I became aware of Yaz's feelings for
> The Doctor until Dan starting asking/advising Yaz about her feelings!!
>
> Tonight, whilst watching, I started thinking .... "Is this why Yads has
> hated these JodyDoc Series so much ..... cause he cottoned on to this
> relationship very early on?? VERY, very, early on!"
>
> I mean, knowing what a solid Christian the clown is, he might have
> 'dis'd' these series for this reason alone, from the very start!!

Only a portion of the modern Christian community is opposed to same sex
relationships. The more enlightened recognise that love is love - sadly,
there is a reactionary tone at present in the Church of England which is
backtracking on the inclusive welcoming approach they were aiming for a
decade ago.

And no way is Dave actually a solid Christian - his constant unrepentant
barrage of lies, insults and judgemental hatreds sets him far from any
Christian ideal.

--
There are some corners of the universe
which have bred the most terrible things.
Things which act against everything we believe in.

They must be /fought/.

On 18/04/2022 12:58, Daniel65 wrote:
> Watching "Doctor Who: Legend of the Sea Devils" tonight, I noticed, for
> the first time I think, that The Doctor is aware of Yaz's feelings for her.
>
> Mind you, I haven't particularly been looking for this interaction, it
> was mainly though reading here that I became aware of Yaz's feelings for
> The Doctor until Dan starting asking/advising Yaz about her feelings!!
>

It was completely pulled out of thin air so Chibnall can promote his
sexist and racist bigotry and claim to have made the Doctor as lesbian.

> Tonight, whilst watching, I started thinking .... "Is this why Yads has
> hated these JodyDoc Series so much ..... cause he cottoned on to this
> relationship very early on?? VERY, very, early on!"
>

There was nothing to cotton on to until it was pulled out of thin air
when the plank told it to the simpleton.

> I mean, knowing what a solid Christian the clown is, he might have
> 'dis'd' these series for this reason alone, from the very start!!

When did he ever diss Captain Jack?

--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw

"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
stands for." -William Shatner

On 18/04/2022 13:34, The Other Doctor wrote:
> "Daniel65" <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote in message
> news:t3jjp8$4io$1@dont-email.me...
>> Watching "Doctor Who: Legend of the Sea Devils" tonight, I noticed, for
>> the first time I think, that The Doctor is aware of Yaz's feelings for
>> her.
>>
>> Mind you, I haven't particularly been looking for this interaction, it was
>> mainly though reading here that I became aware of Yaz's feelings for The
>> Doctor until Dan starting asking/advising Yaz about her feelings!!
>>
>> Tonight, whilst watching, I started thinking .... "Is this why Yads has
>> hated these JodyDoc Series so much ..... cause he cottoned on to this
>> relationship very early on?? VERY, very, early on!"
>>
>> I mean, knowing what a solid Christian the clown is, he might have 'dis'd'
>> these series for this reason alone, from the very start!!
>
> Yads doesn't like any of that icky sex stuff. No matter that Susan was the
> Doctor's granddaughter. Somehow he had grandchildren without ever having sex
> himself. Or if he did have sex once, he's not allowed to have sex with
> anyone ever again. Or anything approaching sexual feelings.
>
> Yads only started hating Doctor Who because he was copying Aggy. Aggy and
> Yads both hate the idea of sex.

You are completely insane.

>
I think their real hatred began with
> Gridlock. I can't remember exactly what set them off. I think there was a

Oh, you mean where RTD decided to promote bestiality by having a woman
have sex with a cat and give birth to his kittens in a basket in the
back of the car?

> couple called Valerie (a human) and Thomas (a Catkind) and they had
> children.

They were kittens that looked like and were exactly the same size as
kittens from a female cat. If this women had given birth to them she
would have crushed them during labour.

>
Which Aggy (and hence Yads) decided was bestiality. And then at

Because it was.

> the end they played the Old Rugged Cross which Yads also thought was
> sacrilege. So it's all been downhill for Aggy and Yads ever since.
>
> Although it may have started sooner when they realised Captain Jack wasn't
> entirely straight...

It was clear that Captain Jack was gay from the first moment you saw him
in The Empty Child, but unlike Chibnall's characters Captain Jack was
not defined just by his sexuality, so no one had a problem with it.

--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw

"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
stands for." -William Shatner

On 18/04/2022 14:23, Daniel65 wrote:
> The Other Doctor wrote on 18/4/22 10:34 pm:
>> "Daniel65" <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote in message
>> news:t3jjp8$4io$1@dont-email.me...
>>> Watching "Doctor Who: Legend of the Sea Devils" tonight, I noticed,
>>> for the first time I think, that The Doctor is aware of Yaz's
>>> feelings for her.
>>>
>>> Mind you, I haven't particularly been looking for this interaction,
>>> it was mainly though reading here that I became aware of Yaz's
>>> feelings for The Doctor until Dan starting asking/advising Yaz
>>> about her feelings!!
>>>
>>> Tonight, whilst watching, I started thinking .... "Is this why Yads
>>> has hated these JodyDoc Series so much ..... cause he cottoned on
>>> to this relationship very early on?? VERY, very, early on!"
>>>
>>> I mean, knowing what a solid Christian the clown is, he might have
>>> 'dis'd' these series for this reason alone, from the very start!!
>>
>> Yads doesn't like any of that icky sex stuff. No matter that Susan
>> was the Doctor's granddaughter. Somehow he had grandchildren without
>> ever having sex himself. Or if he did have sex once, he's not allowed
>> to have sex with anyone ever again. Or anything approaching sexual
>> feelings.
>>
>> Yads only started hating Doctor Who because he was copying Aggy. Aggy
>> and Yads both hate the idea of sex. I think their real hatred began
>> with Gridlock. I can't remember exactly what set them off. I think
>> there was a couple called Valerie (a human) and Thomas (a Catkind)
>> and they had children.
>
> And wasn't there a couple of older Women in one of the cars?? Were they
> the pair keeping track of all the others!!
>
> Two Women together in a confined space!! We can't have that, can we??
>
>> Which Aggy (and hence Yads) decided was
>> bestiality. And then at the end they played the Old Rugged Cross
>> which Yads also thought was sacrilege. So it's all been downhill for
>> Aggy and Yads ever since.
>>
>> Although it may have started sooner when they realised Captain Jack
>> wasn't entirely straight...
>
> OmniSexual, I think was the term they used!!

Bestiality is the term we use for it here on Earth.

--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw

"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
stands for." -William Shatner

Aggy asserted:

> On 18/04/2022 14:23, Daniel65 wrote:
>> The Other Doctor wrote on 18/4/22 10:34 pm:
>>
>>>
>>> Although it may have started sooner when they realised
>>> Captain Jack wasn't entirely straight...
>>
>> OmniSexual, I think was the term they used!!
>
>
> Bestiality is the term we use for it here on Earth.
>

“We” being idiots and incels?

--
solar penguin

Aggy angrily attempted to argue:
: > On 18/04/2022 12:58, Daniel65 wrote:
>> Watching "Doctor Who: Legend of the Sea Devils" tonight, I noticed, for
>> the first time I think, that The Doctor is aware of Yaz's feelings for her.
>>
>> Mind you, I haven't particularly been looking for this interaction, it
>> was mainly though reading here that I became aware of Yaz's feelings for
>> The Doctor until Dan starting asking/advising Yaz about her feelings!!
>>
>
> It was completely pulled out of thin air so Chibnall can
> sexist and racist bigotry and claim to have made the
> Doctor as lesbian.
>
>> Tonight, whilst watching, I started thinking .... "Is this
>> why Yads has hated these JodyDoc Series so much .....
>> cause he cottoned on to this relationship very early
>> on?? VERY, very, early on!"
>>
>
> There was nothing to cotton on to until it was pulled
> out of thin air

Strange how I managed to cotton on to it back in their
second season, and posted about it here.

And how all the Thasmin shippers on forums and social
media also cottoned on.

Maybe some people are just less blinkered than you?

> when the plank told it to the simpleton.
>

What? Who told it to you?

--
solar penguin

On 18/04/2022 17:10, solar penguin wrote:
>
> Aggy asserted:
>
>> On 18/04/2022 14:23, Daniel65 wrote:
>>> The Other Doctor wrote on 18/4/22 10:34 pm:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Although it may have started sooner when they realised
>>>> Captain Jack wasn't entirely straight...
>>>
>>> OmniSexual, I think was the term they used!!
>>
>>
>> Bestiality is the term we use for it here on Earth.
>>
>
> “We” being idiots and incels?
>

You may call yourself and idiot and an incel if you like, but anyone
with any sense calls it bestiality.

--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw

"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
stands for." -William Shatner

"tsbr...@gmail.com" <tsbrueni@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:b5add241-481b-4277-93be-711c343e3d48n@googlegroups.com...
On Monday, April 18, 2022 at 11:59:11 AM UTC-7, The True Doctor wrote:
> On 18/04/2022 17:10, solar penguin wrote:
> >
> > Aggy asserted:
> >
> >> On 18/04/2022 14:23, Daniel65 wrote:
> >>> The Other Doctor wrote on 18/4/22 10:34 pm:
> >>>
> >>>>
>> >>>> Although it may have started sooner when they realised
>> >>>> Captain Jack wasn't entirely straight...
>> >>>
>> >>> OmniSexual, I think was the term they used!!
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Bestiality is the term we use for it here on Earth.
>> >>
>> >
>> > "We" being idiots and incels?
>> >
>> You may call yourself and idiot and an incel if you like, but anyone
>> with any sense calls it bestiality.
>
>Even if the cats in question are bipedal and sentient?

When did Jack say he'd had sex with bipedal sentient cats?

"tsbr...@gmail.com" <tsbrueni@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:3f1324e0-08fa-458e-881e-57445b77ffaan@googlegroups.com...
> On Monday, April 18, 2022 at 12:58:51 PM UTC-7, The Other Doctor wrote:
>> "tsbr...@gmail.com" <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:b5add241-481b-4277...@googlegroups.com...
>> On Monday, April 18, 2022 at 11:59:11 AM UTC-7, The True Doctor wrote:
>> > On 18/04/2022 17:10, solar penguin wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Aggy asserted:
>> > >
>> > >> On 18/04/2022 14:23, Daniel65 wrote:
>> > >>> The Other Doctor wrote on 18/4/22 10:34 pm:
>> > >>>
>> > >>>>
>> >> >>>> Although it may have started sooner when they realised
>> >> >>>> Captain Jack wasn't entirely straight...
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> OmniSexual, I think was the term they used!!
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Bestiality is the term we use for it here on Earth.
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > "We" being idiots and incels?
>> >> >
>> >> You may call yourself and idiot and an incel if you like, but anyone
>> >> with any sense calls it bestiality.
>> >
>> >Even if the cats in question are bipedal and sentient?
>> When did Jack say he'd had sex with bipedal sentient cats?
>
> He didn't, but sex between humans and sentient bipedal cats was taking
> place on New Earth during the 23 years before "Gridlock".

What's that got to do with Jack?

The Doctor wrote on 19/4/22 8:00 am:
> In article <XpCdnQbndKtkKcD_nZ2dnUU7-UudnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>,
> The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>> On 18/04/2022 17:10, solar penguin wrote:
>>> Aggy asserted:
>>>> On 18/04/2022 14:23, Daniel65 wrote:
>>>>> The Other Doctor wrote on 18/4/22 10:34 pm:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Although it may have started sooner when they realised
>>>>>> Captain Jack wasn't entirely straight...
>>>>>
>>>>> OmniSexual, I think was the term they used!!
>>>>
>>>> Bestiality is the term we use for it here on Earth.
>>>
>>> “We” being idiots and incels?
>>
>> You may call yourself and idiot and an incel if you like, but anyone
>> with any sense calls it bestiality.
>
> AP just went Kamikaze.

AP?? Associate Press?? When did they get into this storyline, clown??

Oh! And by the way, clown .... (AKJV) Luke 6:42 Either how canst thou
say to thy brother, Brother, let me pull out the mote that is in thine
eye, when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then
shalt thou see clearly to pull out the mote that is in thy brother’s eye.
--
Daniel

The Doctor wrote on 19/4/22 7:51 am:
> In article <A8ednbUyWpzuFsD_nZ2dnUU7-bWdnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>, The
> True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>> On 18/04/2022 14:23, Daniel65 wrote:
>>> The Other Doctor wrote on 18/4/22 10:34 pm:

<Snip>

>>>> Which Aggy (and hence Yads) decided was bestiality. And then at
>>>> the end they played the Old Rugged Cross which Yads also
>>>> thought was sacrilege. So it's all been downhill for Aggy and
>>>> Yads ever since.
>>>>
>>>> Although it may have started sooner when they realised Captain
>>>> Jack wasn't entirely straight...
>>>
>>> OmniSexual, I think was the term they used!!
>>
>> Bestiality is the term we use for it here on Earth.
>
> Thank you bringing do to reality.

"bringing do"?? Is that sort of like "bringing do-do" but quicker, clown??

Oh! And by the way, clown .... (AKJV) Luke 6:42 Either how canst thou
say to thy brother, Brother, let me pull out the mote that is in thine
eye, when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then
shalt thou see clearly to pull out the mote that is in thy brother’s eye.
--
Daniel

The Doctor wrote on 19/4/22 7:54 am:
> In article <716e4f3f-e1ec-47b5-a844-0c070a0466c4n@googlegroups.com>,
> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbrueni@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Monday, April 18, 2022 at 7:45:52 AM UTC-7, netk...@gmail.com
>> wrote:
>>> In article <t3jjp8$4io$1...@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>> <dani...@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>>> Watching "Doctor Who: Legend of the Sea Devils" tonight, I
>>>> noticed, for the first time I think, that The Doctor is aware
>>>> of Yaz's feelings for her.
>>>>
>>>> Mind you, I haven't particularly been looking for this
>>>> interaction, it was mainly though reading here that I became
>>>> aware of Yaz's feelings for The Doctor until Dan starting
>>>> asking/advising Yaz about her feelings!!
>>>>
>>>> Tonight, whilst watching, I started thinking .... "Is this why
>>>> Yads has hated these JodyDoc Series so much ..... cause he
>>>> cottoned on to this relationship very early on?? VERY, very,
>>>> early on!"
>>>>
>>>> I mean, knowing what a solid Christian the clown is, he might
>>>> have 'dis'd' these series for this reason alone, from the very
>>>> start!!
>>> That has been a topic of discussion on Social media.
>>
>> Dear Yads: Did you suspect early on that JodieDoc might get
>> involved in a lesbian relationship? If so, did that suspicion
>> cause you to decide from the get go that JodieDoc was bogus?
>
> Still a bogus event.

Failure to answer Question asked, NOTED!!

Oh! And by the way, clown .... (AKJV) Luke 6:42 Either how canst thou
say to thy brother, Brother, let me pull out the mote that is in thine
eye, when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then
shalt thou see clearly to pull out the mote that is in thy brother’s eye.
--
Daniel

Binky bleated:

> In article <t3m8de$n3r$3@dont-email.me>,
> Daniel65 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 19/4/22 7:54 am:
>>> In article <716e4f3f-e1ec-47b5-a844-0c070a0466c4n@googlegroups.com>,
>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbrueni@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Dear Yads: Did you suspect early on that JodieDoc might get
>>>> involved in a lesbian relationship? If so, did that suspicion
>>>> cause you to decide from the get go that JodieDoc was bogus?
>>>
>>> Still a bogus event.
>>
>> Failure to answer Question asked, NOTED!!
>>
>
>
> Failure to accept the answer noted.
>

How is he supposed to accept an answer that hasn’t even
been given???

You need to answer the question, then he can accept it.

--
solar penguin

Binky bleated:

> In article <t3mllj$7ej$1@dont-email.me>,
> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Binky bleated:
>>
>>> In article <t3m8de$n3r$3@dont-email.me>,
>>> Daniel65 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor wrote on 19/4/22 7:54 am:
>>>>> In article <716e4f3f-e1ec-47b5-a844-0c070a0466c4n@googlegroups.com>,
>>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbrueni@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dear Yads: Did you suspect early on that JodieDoc might get
>>>>>> involved in a lesbian relationship? If so, did that suspicion
>>>>>> cause you to decide from the get go that JodieDoc was bogus?
>>>>>
>>>>> Still a bogus event.
>>>>
>>>> Failure to answer Question asked, NOTED!!
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Failure to accept the answer noted.
>>>
>>
>> How is he supposed to accept an answer that hasn’t even
>> been given???
>>
>> You need to answer the question, then he can accept it.
>
> The Timeless Child is all bogis!
>
> Too difficult for you to understand?
>

I don’t understand how it’s an answer to the question.

Three-year-olds can understand the relationship between
questions and answers. You’re 50 years older than that!
Why can’t you manage it?

You were asked, “Did you suspect early on that JodieDoc
might get involved in a lesbian relationship?”

Suitable answers include, “Yes, I did,” or “No, I didn’t.”

Replying, “Still a bogus event,” or “The Timeless Child
is all bogis!” is not an answer, because it doesn’t follow
on from the question.

Now, let’s try it again:

Did you suspect early on that JodieDoc might get involved
in a lesbian relationship?

Answer, “Yes, I did,” or “No, I didn’t.”

--
solar penguin

Binky bleated:

> In article <t3nc29$pf1$1@dont-email.me>,
> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Binky bleated:
>>
>>> In article <t3mllj$7ej$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Binky bleated:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <t3m8de$n3r$3@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> Daniel65 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>>>>> The Doctor wrote on 19/4/22 7:54 am:
>>>>>>> In article <716e4f3f-e1ec-47b5-a844-0c070a0466c4n@googlegroups.com>,
>>>>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbrueni@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Dear Yads: Did you suspect early on that JodieDoc
>>>>>>>> might get involved in a lesbian relationship?
>>>>>>>> If so, did that suspicion cause you to decide
>>>>>>>> from the get go that JodieDoc was bogus?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Still a bogus event.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Failure to answer Question asked, NOTED!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Failure to accept the answer noted.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> How is he supposed to accept an answer that hasn’t even
>>>> been given???
>>>>
>>>> You need to answer the question, then he can accept it.
>>>>
>>>
>>> The Timeless Child is all bogis!
>>>
>>> Too difficult for you to understand?
>>>
>>
>> I don’t understand how it’s an answer to the question.
>>
>> Three-year-olds can understand the relationship between
>> questions and answers. You’re 50 years older than that!
>> Why can’t you manage it?
>>
>> You were asked, “Did you suspect early on that JodieDoc
>> might get involved in a lesbian relationship?”
>>
>> Suitable answers include, “Yes, I did,” or “No, I didn’t.”
>>
>> Replying, “Still a bogus event,” or “The Timeless Child
>> is all bogis!” is not an answer, because it doesn’t follow
>> on from the question.
>>
>> Now, let’s try it again:
>>
>> Did you suspect early on that JodieDoc might get involved
>> in a lesbian relationship?
>>
>> Answer, “Yes, I did,” or “No, I didn’t.”
>>
>
> SP ever visitied /dev/null?
>

Why? Would I find your answer there?

Try again:

Did you suspect early on that JodieDoc might get involved
in a lesbian relationship?

Answer, “Yes, I did,” or “No, I didn’t.”

--
solar penguin

The Doctor wrote on 19/04/2022 11:55 pm:
> In article <t3m7vm$n3r$1@dont-email.me>,
> Daniel65 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 19/4/22 8:00 am:
>>> In article <XpCdnQbndKtkKcD_nZ2dnUU7-UudnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>,
>>> The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>>>> On 18/04/2022 17:10, solar penguin wrote:
>>>>> Aggy asserted:
>>>>>> On 18/04/2022 14:23, Daniel65 wrote:
>>>>>>> The Other Doctor wrote on 18/4/22 10:34 pm:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Although it may have started sooner when they realised
>>>>>>>> Captain Jack wasn't entirely straight...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> OmniSexual, I think was the term they used!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bestiality is the term we use for it here on Earth.
>>>>>
>>>>> “We” being idiots and incels?
>>>>
>>>> You may call yourself and idiot and an incel if you like, but anyone
>>>> with any sense calls it bestiality.
>>>
>>> AP just went Kamikaze.
>>
>> AP?? Associate Press?? When did they get into this storyline, clown??

> A Penguin there, Dannyboy.

Ah!! O.K., when did Penguins get written into the story, clown??

Oh! And by the way, clown .... (AKJV) Luke 6:42 Either how canst thou
say to thy brother, Brother, let me pull out the mote that is in thine
eye, when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then
shalt thou see clearly to pull out the mote that is in thy brother’s eye.
--
Daniel

solar penguin wrote on 20/04/2022 4:46 pm:
> Binky bleated:
>> In article <t3nc29$pf1$1@dont-email.me>,
>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Binky bleated:
>>>> In article <t3mllj$7ej$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Binky bleated:
>>>>>> In article <t3m8de$n3r$3@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>> Daniel65 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>>>>>> The Doctor wrote on 19/4/22 7:54 am:
>>>>>>>> In article <716e4f3f-e1ec-47b5-a844-0c070a0466c4n@googlegroups.com>,
>>>>>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbrueni@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Dear Yads: Did you suspect early on that JodieDoc
>>>>>>>>> might get involved in a lesbian relationship?
>>>>>>>>> If so, did that suspicion cause you to decide
>>>>>>>>> from the get go that JodieDoc was bogus?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Still a bogus event.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Failure to answer Question asked, NOTED!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Failure to accept the answer noted.
>>>>>
>>>>> How is he supposed to accept an answer that hasn’t even
>>>>> been given???
>>>>>
>>>>> You need to answer the question, then he can accept it.
>>>>
>>>> The Timeless Child is all bogis!
>>>>
>>>> Too difficult for you to understand?
>>>
>>> I don’t understand how it’s an answer to the question.
>>>
>>> Three-year-olds can understand the relationship between
>>> questions and answers. You’re 50 years older than that!
>>> Why can’t you manage it?
>>>
>>> You were asked, “Did you suspect early on that JodieDoc
>>> might get involved in a lesbian relationship?”
>>>
>>> Suitable answers include, “Yes, I did,” or “No, I didn’t.”
>>>
>>> Replying, “Still a bogus event,” or “The Timeless Child
>>> is all bogis!” is not an answer, because it doesn’t follow
>>> on from the question.
>>>
>>> Now, let’s try it again:
>>>
>>> Did you suspect early on that JodieDoc might get involved
>>> in a lesbian relationship?
>>>
>>> Answer, “Yes, I did,” or “No, I didn’t.”
>>
>> SP ever visitied /dev/null?
>
> Why? Would I find your answer there?
>
> Try again:
>
> Did you suspect early on that JodieDoc might get involved
> in a lesbian relationship?
>
> Answer, “Yes, I did,” or “No, I didn’t.”

What's the word that the clown likes to include when HE wants you to
*ONLY* use one of two options that the clown offers?? Ummm!!
--
Daniel

Binky bleated:

> In article <t3oa7m$8st$1@dont-email.me>,
> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Binky bleated:
>>
>>> In article <t3nc29$pf1$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Binky bleated:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <t3mllj$7ej$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Binky bleated:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In article <t3m8de$n3r$3@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>> Daniel65 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>> The Doctor wrote on 19/4/22 7:54 am:
>>>>>>>>> In article <716e4f3f-e1ec-47b5-a844-0c070a0466c4n@googlegroups.com>,
>>>>>>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbrueni@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Dear Yads: Did you suspect early on that JodieDoc
>>>>>>>>>> might get involved in a lesbian relationship?
>>>>>>>>>> If so, did that suspicion cause you to decide
>>>>>>>>>> from the get go that JodieDoc was bogus?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Still a bogus event.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Failure to answer Question asked, NOTED!!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Failure to accept the answer noted.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How is he supposed to accept an answer that hasn’t even
>>>>>> been given???
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You need to answer the question, then he can accept it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The Timeless Child is all bogis!
>>>>>
>>>>> Too difficult for you to understand?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I don’t understand how it’s an answer to the question.
>>>>
>>>> Three-year-olds can understand the relationship between
>>>> questions and answers. You’re 50 years older than that!
>>>> Why can’t you manage it?
>>>>
>>>> You were asked, “Did you suspect early on that JodieDoc
>>>> might get involved in a lesbian relationship?”
>>>>
>>>> Suitable answers include, “Yes, I did,” or “No, I didn’t.”
>>>>
>>>> Replying, “Still a bogus event,” or “The Timeless Child
>>>> is all bogis!” is not an answer, because it doesn’t follow
>>>> on from the question.
>>>>
>>>> Now, let’s try it again:
>>>>
>>>> Did you suspect early on that JodieDoc might get involved
>>>> in a lesbian relationship?
>>>>
>>>> Answer, “Yes, I did,” or “No, I didn’t.”
>>>>
>>>
>>> SP ever visitied /dev/null?
>>>
>>
>> Why? Would I find your answer there?
>>
>
> No you got the idea!

I didn’t get an answer!

>
> The Timelss child is a /dev/null event!
>

And if you were asked for an example of a /dev/null event
that would be an answer. (A wrong answer, but still an
answer.)

But you weren’t asked about /dev/null events. So it isn’t
even an answer.

>> Try again:

Try again, again:

>>
>> Did you suspect early on that JodieDoc might get involved
>> in a lesbian relationship?
>>
>> Answer, “Yes, I did,” or “No, I didn’t.”
>>

--
solar penguin

Binky bleated:

> In article <96d0abe0-43be-49a4-9643-c4fd242fa84bn@googlegroups.com>,
> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbrueni@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> What would be an example of a right answer to the
>> /dev/null event Q?
>
> did the event ever exist?

Liar! That’s not an answer! It’s another question!

--
solar penguin

Binky bleated:

> In article <t3pma7$fq6$1@dont-email.me>,
> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Binky bleated:
>>
>>> In article <t3oa7m$8st$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Binky bleated:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <t3nc29$pf1$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Did you suspect early on that JodieDoc might
>>>>>> get involved in a lesbian relationship?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Answer, “Yes, I did,” or “No, I didn’t.”
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> SP ever visitied /dev/null?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Why? Would I find your answer there?
>>>>
>>>
>>> No you got the idea!
>>
>> I didn’t get an answer!
>>
>>>
>>> The Timelss child is a /dev/null event!
>>>
>>
>> And if you were asked for an example of a /dev/null event
>> that would be an answer. (A wrong answer, but still an
>> answer.)
>>
>> But you weren’t asked about /dev/null events. So it isn’t
>> even an answer.
>>
>>>> Try again:
>>
>> Try again, again:
>>
>
> The Timeless Child is a /dev/null event!
>

That _still_ isn’t a valid answer.

You weren’t asked about /dev/null events. You were asked
about you noticing things.

See the difference!

Now have one last go, and see if you can manage it.
Remember to answer “Yes, I did,” or “No, I didn’t.”

>>>>
>>>> Did you suspect early on that JodieDoc might get
>>>> involved in a lesbian relationship?
>>>>
>>>> Answer, “Yes, I did,” or “No, I didn’t.”
>>>>
>>

--
solar penguin

Tim typed:

> On Wednesday, April 20, 2022 at 12:18:34 PM UTC-7, solar penguin wrote:
>> Binky bleated:
>>> In article <t3oa7m$8st$1...@dont-email.me>,
>>> solar penguin <solar....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Binky bleated:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <t3nc29$pf1$1...@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> solar penguin <solar....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Did you suspect early on that JodieDoc might
>>>>>> get involved in a lesbian relationship?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Answer, “Yes, I did,” or “No, I didn’t.”
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> SP ever visitied /dev/null?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Why? Would I find your answer there?
>>>>
>>>
>>> No you got the idea!
>> I didn’t get an answer!
>>>
>>> The Timelss child is a /dev/null event!
>>>
>> And if you were asked for an example of a /dev/null event
>> that would be an answer. (A wrong answer, but still an
>> answer.)
>
> What would be an example of a right answer to the
> /dev/null event Q?
>

“Nothing because there are no such things as /dev/null
events. Binky made them up.”

--
solar penguin