Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

Where will it all end? Probably somewhere near where it all began.


arts / rec.arts.sf.written / Re: A Possible Profitable Future for Space Flight - Space Solar Power

SubjectAuthor
* A Possible Profitable Future for Space Flight - Space Solar PowerJonathan
+* Re: A Possible Profitable Future for Space Flight - Space Solar PowerQuadibloc
|`* Re: A Possible Profitable Future for Space Flight - Space Solar Powerpete...@gmail.com
| +- Re: A Possible Profitable Future for Space Flight - Space Solar PowerAndrew McDowell
| +* Re: A Possible Profitable Future for Space Flight - Space Solar PowerThomas Koenig
| |+* Re: A Possible Profitable Future for Space Flight - Space Solar PowerQuadibloc
| ||+* Re: A Possible Profitable Future for Space Flight - Space Solar PowerSjouke Burry
| |||+* Re: A Possible Profitable Future for Space Flight - Space Solar PowerChristian Weisgerber
| ||||+- Re: A Possible Profitable Future for Space Flight - Space Solar PowerJ. Clarke
| ||||`- Re: A Possible Profitable Future for Space Flight - Space Solar PowerJonathan
| |||`* Re: A Possible Profitable Future for Space Flight - Space Solar PowerThe Horny Goat
| ||| `- Re: A Possible Profitable Future for Space Flight - Space Solar PowerJames Nicoll
| ||`* Re: A Possible Profitable Future for Space Flight - Space Solar PowerChristian Weisgerber
| || `- Re: A Possible Profitable Future for Space Flight - Space Solar PowerJibini Kula Tumbili Kujisalimisha
| |`- Re: A Possible Profitable Future for Space Flight - Space Solar PowerJonathan
| `* Re: A Possible Profitable Future for Space Flight - Space Solar PowerJ. Clarke
|  +- Re: A Possible Profitable Future for Space Flight - Space Solar PowerJibini Kula Tumbili Kujisalimisha
|  `* Re: A Possible Profitable Future for Space Flight - Space Solar Powerpete...@gmail.com
|   `* Re: A Possible Profitable Future for Space Flight - Space Solar PowerJ. Clarke
|    `* Re: A Possible Profitable Future for Space Flight - Space Solar Powerpete...@gmail.com
|     `- Re: A Possible Profitable Future for Space Flight - Space Solar PowerJ. Clarke
+- Re: A Possible Profitable Future for Space Flight - Space Solar PowerLynn McGuire
`* Re: A Possible Profitable Future for Space Flight - Space Solar PowerBill Gill
 +* Re: A Possible Profitable Future for Space Flight - Space Solar PowerJonathan
 |`* Re: A Possible Profitable Future for Space Flight - Space Solar Powerpete...@gmail.com
 | +- Re: A Possible Profitable Future for Space Flight - Space Solar PowerJonathan
 | +- Re: A Possible Profitable Future for Space Flight - Space Solar PowerJ. Clarke
 | `- Re: A Possible Profitable Future for Space Flight - Space Solar PowerJibini Kula Tumbili Kujisalimisha
 +* Re: A Possible Profitable Future for Space Flight - Space Solar PowerJ. Clarke
 |`- Re: A Possible Profitable Future for Space Flight - Space Solar PowerJonathan
 `- Re: A Possible Profitable Future for Space Flight - Space Solar PowerRobert Carnegie

Pages:12
Re: A Possible Profitable Future for Space Flight - Space Solar Power

<7afb4819-fa8e-463c-a9f7-5ee20ef51564n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=62179&group=rec.arts.sf.written#62179

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written
X-Received: by 2002:a37:747:: with SMTP id 68mr12492835qkh.526.1633393996990;
Mon, 04 Oct 2021 17:33:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:5d8:: with SMTP id 207mr18489460ybf.102.1633393996702;
Mon, 04 Oct 2021 17:33:16 -0700 (PDT)
Path: rocksolid2!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2021 17:33:16 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <gjvmlg1li56dp4ot18afqjuufuc3ll8das@4ax.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=73.17.220.232; posting-account=BUItcQoAAACgV97n05UTyfLcl1Rd4W33
NNTP-Posting-Host: 73.17.220.232
References: <5OGdneABSLaLpMf8nZ2dnUU7-XvNnZ2d@giganews.com>
<9f023483-a1bf-4c09-82da-e4d1a690f4a2n@googlegroups.com> <605bcd8a-7af2-4205-8a25-6a43c05e771en@googlegroups.com>
<gjvmlg1li56dp4ot18afqjuufuc3ll8das@4ax.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <7afb4819-fa8e-463c-a9f7-5ee20ef51564n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: A Possible Profitable Future for Space Flight - Space Solar Power
From: petert...@gmail.com (pete...@gmail.com)
Injection-Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2021 00:33:16 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 27
 by: pete...@gmail.com - Tue, 5 Oct 2021 00:33 UTC

On Monday, October 4, 2021 at 6:27:49 PM UTC-4, J. Clarke wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Oct 2021 06:58:41 -0700 (PDT), "pete...@gmail.com"
> <pete...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >On Monday, October 4, 2021 at 1:00:57 AM UTC-4, Quadibloc wrote:
> >> I remember The High Frontier by Gerard K. O'Neill. In it, he noted that
> >> solar power from space was perhaps the only possible economic
> >> justification for the early stages of building L5 space colonies of the
> >> type he described.
> >
> >That was 45 years ago. Things have changed.
> >
> >1. SpaceX looks likely to drop the cost of getting stuff to space by
> >an order of magnitude or two.
> O'Neill was assuming that NASA was going to achieve $500/lb.
> Correcting for inflation Falcon 9 is _there_.
> >2. PVE panels have crashed in price. in 1977, you paid about $77/watt.
> >Now its around 0.70/watt, a hundred fold less.
> Price of the panels is only part of the cost.

This article about the costs of solar farms gives some helpful BoE
numbers on large solar installations. It does not cover storage,
which can actually be a profit center since you can arbitrage when
you sell you power.

https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/what-is-a-solar-farm-do-i-need-one

Pt

Re: A Possible Profitable Future for Space Flight - Space Solar Power

<ji8nlg9p1vh7j4j6bube9bmmrheq6b7gis@4ax.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=62180&group=rec.arts.sf.written#62180

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written
Path: rocksolid2!i2pn.org!usenet.goja.nl.eu.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!peer01.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx43.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: jclarke....@gmail.com (J. Clarke)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written
Subject: Re: A Possible Profitable Future for Space Flight - Space Solar Power
Message-ID: <ji8nlg9p1vh7j4j6bube9bmmrheq6b7gis@4ax.com>
References: <5OGdneABSLaLpMf8nZ2dnUU7-XvNnZ2d@giganews.com> <9f023483-a1bf-4c09-82da-e4d1a690f4a2n@googlegroups.com> <605bcd8a-7af2-4205-8a25-6a43c05e771en@googlegroups.com> <gjvmlg1li56dp4ot18afqjuufuc3ll8das@4ax.com> <7afb4819-fa8e-463c-a9f7-5ee20ef51564n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 35
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte - www.forteinc.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2021 20:56:24 -0400
X-Received-Bytes: 2720
 by: J. Clarke - Tue, 5 Oct 2021 00:56 UTC

On Mon, 4 Oct 2021 17:33:16 -0700 (PDT), "pete...@gmail.com"
<petertrei@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Monday, October 4, 2021 at 6:27:49 PM UTC-4, J. Clarke wrote:
>> On Mon, 4 Oct 2021 06:58:41 -0700 (PDT), "pete...@gmail.com"
>> <pete...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >On Monday, October 4, 2021 at 1:00:57 AM UTC-4, Quadibloc wrote:
>> >> I remember The High Frontier by Gerard K. O'Neill. In it, he noted that
>> >> solar power from space was perhaps the only possible economic
>> >> justification for the early stages of building L5 space colonies of the
>> >> type he described.
>> >
>> >That was 45 years ago. Things have changed.
>> >
>> >1. SpaceX looks likely to drop the cost of getting stuff to space by
>> >an order of magnitude or two.
>> O'Neill was assuming that NASA was going to achieve $500/lb.
>> Correcting for inflation Falcon 9 is _there_.
>> >2. PVE panels have crashed in price. in 1977, you paid about $77/watt.
>> >Now its around 0.70/watt, a hundred fold less.
>> Price of the panels is only part of the cost.
>
>This article about the costs of solar farms gives some helpful BoE
>numbers on large solar installations. It does not cover storage,
>which can actually be a profit center since you can arbitrage when
>you sell you power.
>
>https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/what-is-a-solar-farm-do-i-need-one

If you're talking a national scale solar powered grid with no fossil
fuel use, the ability to "arbitrage when you sell your power" goes
down the crapper. Peak load in winter will be late at night when it's
cold and lots of heat is needed. We don't have that now because most
heat in the US is oil or gas, not electric.

Re: A Possible Profitable Future for Space Flight - Space Solar Power

<843949db-7b8b-4a07-a526-1dff9a53a0c2n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=62181&group=rec.arts.sf.written#62181

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:1ca:: with SMTP id b10mr16549825qtg.327.1633396301306;
Mon, 04 Oct 2021 18:11:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:5084:: with SMTP id e126mr18572205ybb.475.1633396301073;
Mon, 04 Oct 2021 18:11:41 -0700 (PDT)
Path: rocksolid2!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2021 18:11:40 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <ji8nlg9p1vh7j4j6bube9bmmrheq6b7gis@4ax.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=73.17.220.232; posting-account=BUItcQoAAACgV97n05UTyfLcl1Rd4W33
NNTP-Posting-Host: 73.17.220.232
References: <5OGdneABSLaLpMf8nZ2dnUU7-XvNnZ2d@giganews.com>
<9f023483-a1bf-4c09-82da-e4d1a690f4a2n@googlegroups.com> <605bcd8a-7af2-4205-8a25-6a43c05e771en@googlegroups.com>
<gjvmlg1li56dp4ot18afqjuufuc3ll8das@4ax.com> <7afb4819-fa8e-463c-a9f7-5ee20ef51564n@googlegroups.com>
<ji8nlg9p1vh7j4j6bube9bmmrheq6b7gis@4ax.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <843949db-7b8b-4a07-a526-1dff9a53a0c2n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: A Possible Profitable Future for Space Flight - Space Solar Power
From: petert...@gmail.com (pete...@gmail.com)
Injection-Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2021 01:11:41 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 43
 by: pete...@gmail.com - Tue, 5 Oct 2021 01:11 UTC

On Monday, October 4, 2021 at 8:56:27 PM UTC-4, J. Clarke wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Oct 2021 17:33:16 -0700 (PDT), "pete...@gmail.com"
> <pete...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >On Monday, October 4, 2021 at 6:27:49 PM UTC-4, J. Clarke wrote:
> >> On Mon, 4 Oct 2021 06:58:41 -0700 (PDT), "pete...@gmail.com"
> >> <pete...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >On Monday, October 4, 2021 at 1:00:57 AM UTC-4, Quadibloc wrote:
> >> >> I remember The High Frontier by Gerard K. O'Neill. In it, he noted that
> >> >> solar power from space was perhaps the only possible economic
> >> >> justification for the early stages of building L5 space colonies of the
> >> >> type he described.
> >> >
> >> >That was 45 years ago. Things have changed.
> >> >
> >> >1. SpaceX looks likely to drop the cost of getting stuff to space by
> >> >an order of magnitude or two.
> >> O'Neill was assuming that NASA was going to achieve $500/lb.
> >> Correcting for inflation Falcon 9 is _there_.
> >> >2. PVE panels have crashed in price. in 1977, you paid about $77/watt.
> >> >Now its around 0.70/watt, a hundred fold less.
> >> Price of the panels is only part of the cost.
> >
> >This article about the costs of solar farms gives some helpful BoE
> >numbers on large solar installations. It does not cover storage,
> >which can actually be a profit center since you can arbitrage when
> >you sell you power.
> >
> >https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/what-is-a-solar-farm-do-i-need-one
> If you're talking a national scale solar powered grid with no fossil
> fuel use, the ability to "arbitrage when you sell your power" goes
> down the crapper. Peak load in winter will be late at night when it's
> cold and lots of heat is needed. We don't have that now because most
> heat in the US is oil or gas, not electric.

If the electricity price varies over a 24 hour period, and you have storage,
you can arbitrage. The reason it varies is irrelevant.

Lots more home are installing electrically powered heat pumps for
HVAC. Just did so myself. Kept the oil furnace for hot water and
extreme cold.

Pt

Re: A Possible Profitable Future for Space Flight - Space Solar Power

<2s9olgh41dhkpveml64q4gkig4vck2k0mu@4ax.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=62190&group=rec.arts.sf.written#62190

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written
Path: rocksolid2!news.neodome.net!news.mixmin.net!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!peer03.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx40.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: jclarke....@gmail.com (J. Clarke)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written
Subject: Re: A Possible Profitable Future for Space Flight - Space Solar Power
Message-ID: <2s9olgh41dhkpveml64q4gkig4vck2k0mu@4ax.com>
References: <5OGdneABSLaLpMf8nZ2dnUU7-XvNnZ2d@giganews.com> <9f023483-a1bf-4c09-82da-e4d1a690f4a2n@googlegroups.com> <605bcd8a-7af2-4205-8a25-6a43c05e771en@googlegroups.com> <gjvmlg1li56dp4ot18afqjuufuc3ll8das@4ax.com> <7afb4819-fa8e-463c-a9f7-5ee20ef51564n@googlegroups.com> <ji8nlg9p1vh7j4j6bube9bmmrheq6b7gis@4ax.com> <843949db-7b8b-4a07-a526-1dff9a53a0c2n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 52
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte - www.forteinc.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2021 06:25:13 -0400
X-Received-Bytes: 3671
 by: J. Clarke - Tue, 5 Oct 2021 10:25 UTC

On Mon, 4 Oct 2021 18:11:40 -0700 (PDT), "pete...@gmail.com"
<petertrei@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Monday, October 4, 2021 at 8:56:27 PM UTC-4, J. Clarke wrote:
>> On Mon, 4 Oct 2021 17:33:16 -0700 (PDT), "pete...@gmail.com"
>> <pete...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >On Monday, October 4, 2021 at 6:27:49 PM UTC-4, J. Clarke wrote:
>> >> On Mon, 4 Oct 2021 06:58:41 -0700 (PDT), "pete...@gmail.com"
>> >> <pete...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >On Monday, October 4, 2021 at 1:00:57 AM UTC-4, Quadibloc wrote:
>> >> >> I remember The High Frontier by Gerard K. O'Neill. In it, he noted that
>> >> >> solar power from space was perhaps the only possible economic
>> >> >> justification for the early stages of building L5 space colonies of the
>> >> >> type he described.
>> >> >
>> >> >That was 45 years ago. Things have changed.
>> >> >
>> >> >1. SpaceX looks likely to drop the cost of getting stuff to space by
>> >> >an order of magnitude or two.
>> >> O'Neill was assuming that NASA was going to achieve $500/lb.
>> >> Correcting for inflation Falcon 9 is _there_.
>> >> >2. PVE panels have crashed in price. in 1977, you paid about $77/watt.
>> >> >Now its around 0.70/watt, a hundred fold less.
>> >> Price of the panels is only part of the cost.
>> >
>> >This article about the costs of solar farms gives some helpful BoE
>> >numbers on large solar installations. It does not cover storage,
>> >which can actually be a profit center since you can arbitrage when
>> >you sell you power.
>> >
>> >https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/what-is-a-solar-farm-do-i-need-one
>> If you're talking a national scale solar powered grid with no fossil
>> fuel use, the ability to "arbitrage when you sell your power" goes
>> down the crapper. Peak load in winter will be late at night when it's
>> cold and lots of heat is needed. We don't have that now because most
>> heat in the US is oil or gas, not electric.
>
>If the electricity price varies over a 24 hour period, and you have storage,
>you can arbitrage. The reason it varies is irrelevant.

And if you "arbitrage" in such a manner that people start freezing,
pretty soon the government will take away your power to "arbitrage".

That tactic only works if the stored energy is not actually _needed_.

>Lots more home are installing electrically powered heat pumps for
>HVAC. Just did so myself. Kept the oil furnace for hot water and
>extreme cold.

Using an oil furnace solely to heat water is horribly inefficient.

Re: A Possible Profitable Future for Space Flight - Space Solar Power

<f9679526-60c6-432a-83ac-81224869d8d1n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=62191&group=rec.arts.sf.written#62191

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written
X-Received: by 2002:a37:44c8:: with SMTP id r191mr14481704qka.507.1633429790788; Tue, 05 Oct 2021 03:29:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:d906:: with SMTP id q6mr21805413ybg.129.1633429790601; Tue, 05 Oct 2021 03:29:50 -0700 (PDT)
Path: rocksolid2!news.neodome.net!feeder5.feed.usenet.farm!feeder1.feed.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2021 03:29:50 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <sjetlk$jhn$1@dont-email.me>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=94.197.145.141; posting-account=dELd-gkAAABehNzDMBP4sfQElk2tFztP
NNTP-Posting-Host: 94.197.145.141
References: <5OGdneABSLaLpMf8nZ2dnUU7-XvNnZ2d@giganews.com> <sjetlk$jhn$1@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <f9679526-60c6-432a-83ac-81224869d8d1n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: A Possible Profitable Future for Space Flight - Space Solar Power
From: rja.carn...@excite.com (Robert Carnegie)
Injection-Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2021 10:29:50 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 8
 by: Robert Carnegie - Tue, 5 Oct 2021 10:29 UTC

On Monday, 4 October 2021 at 13:56:24 UTC+1, Bill Gill wrote:
> I recall some science fiction story where there was a tug on the
> transmitter that caused the beam to wander and cause a lot of
> destruction.

In Isaac Asimov's "Reason", which was mentioned,
that was mentioned early as a possibility. They did
it anyway... just how much damage was done in
your story?

Re: A Possible Profitable Future for Space Flight - Space Solar Power

<sjhill$abt$1@reader1.panix.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=62196&group=rec.arts.sf.written#62196

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written
Path: rocksolid2!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!panix!.POSTED.panix3.panix.com!not-for-mail
From: jdnic...@panix.com (James Nicoll)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written
Subject: Re: A Possible Profitable Future for Space Flight - Space Solar Power
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2021 13:07:01 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: Public Access Networks Corp.
Message-ID: <sjhill$abt$1@reader1.panix.com>
References: <5OGdneABSLaLpMf8nZ2dnUU7-XvNnZ2d@giganews.com> <1ae818ac-6f05-43fb-9918-d328b1adc619n@googlegroups.com> <nnd$55beadbe$036cc52b@f04f0f266a565fe9> <e55nlghvss1p9sksgnl1o3qsukbhkhku0e@4ax.com>
Injection-Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2021 13:07:01 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader1.panix.com; posting-host="panix3.panix.com:166.84.1.3";
logging-data="10621"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@panix.com"
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
 by: James Nicoll - Tue, 5 Oct 2021 13:07 UTC

In article <e55nlghvss1p9sksgnl1o3qsukbhkhku0e@4ax.com>,
The Horny Goat <lcraver@home.ca> wrote:
>On Mon, 04 Oct 2021 21:05:29 +0200, Sjouke Burry
><burrynulnulfour@ppllaanneett.nnll> wrote:
>
>>Getting microwaved from space by high intensity radiowaves
>>is quite unhealthy.
>>Those beams can even set fire to whole citys.
>>Like being inside a huge micowave oven.
>
>Jerry Pournelle wrote extensively in various publications in the 80s
>(Byte magazine among others which is where I found him) on satellite
>based solar power based on assembly in orbit based on materials sent
>from mass drivers on the moon.

He also wrote about how fast and easy it would be to terraform Venus, so
not a particularly reliable source.
--
My reviews can be found at http://jamesdavisnicoll.com/
My tor pieces at https://www.tor.com/author/james-davis-nicoll/
My Dreamwidth at https://james-davis-nicoll.dreamwidth.org/
My patreon is at https://www.patreon.com/jamesdnicoll

Pages:12
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.81
clearnet tor