Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

Trouble always comes at the wrong time.

arts / alt.history.what-if / Earl Warren and Bush v. Gore

SubjectAuthor
* Earl Warren and Bush v. GoreWolfBear
`* Re: Earl Warren and Bush v. Goredama...@gmail.com
 `- Re: Earl Warren and Bush v. GoreWolfBear

1
Earl Warren and Bush v. Gore

<3d57715a-9196-4474-9d48-357a2e6f9168n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=6294&group=alt.history.what-if#6294

  copy link   Newsgroups: alt.history.what-if
X-Received: by 2002:ad4:4e24:: with SMTP id dm4mr19962499qvb.33.1623100478502;
Mon, 07 Jun 2021 14:14:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:b9c1:: with SMTP id y1mr26741149ybj.321.1623100478355;
Mon, 07 Jun 2021 14:14:38 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!news.mixmin.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: alt.history.what-if
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2021 14:14:38 -0700 (PDT)
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=68.228.73.154; posting-account=ZUrk_QoAAABZ9y2QYeTVPJa9mdyxu9a6
NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.228.73.154
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <3d57715a-9196-4474-9d48-357a2e6f9168n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Earl Warren and Bush v. Gore
From: m4j...@gmail.com (WolfBear)
Injection-Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2021 21:14:38 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 by: WolfBear - Mon, 7 Jun 2021 21:14 UTC

Had Earl Warren lived until age 110 and remained on the US Supreme Court until his death, how exactly would he have ruled in Bush v. Gore? Would he have accepted George W. Bush's equal protection argument, albeit not Bush's proposed remedy?

I'm asking this question because the Bush v. Gore majority actually did rely on Earl Warren's opinion in Reynolds v. Sims to help make their case/argument that Florida's recount violated equal protection. So, it would have actually been interesting to see the author of this opinion personally comment on this matter.

Re: Earl Warren and Bush v. Gore

<22eb4466-f671-4679-8d2f-5e736898b4e6n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=6324&group=alt.history.what-if#6324

  copy link   Newsgroups: alt.history.what-if
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:645:: with SMTP id a5mr26101024qka.70.1623237898199;
Wed, 09 Jun 2021 04:24:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:880f:: with SMTP id c15mr37029519ybl.247.1623237898023;
Wed, 09 Jun 2021 04:24:58 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: alt.history.what-if
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2021 04:24:57 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <3d57715a-9196-4474-9d48-357a2e6f9168n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=50.222.115.110; posting-account=09VrTAoAAAB_TCOu-ilK7mcryQpoQfic
NNTP-Posting-Host: 50.222.115.110
References: <3d57715a-9196-4474-9d48-357a2e6f9168n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <22eb4466-f671-4679-8d2f-5e736898b4e6n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Earl Warren and Bush v. Gore
From: damark...@gmail.com (dama...@gmail.com)
Injection-Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2021 11:24:58 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 by: dama...@gmail.com - Wed, 9 Jun 2021 11:24 UTC

On Monday, June 7, 2021 at 5:14:38 PM UTC-4, WolfBear wrote:
> Had Earl Warren lived until age 110 and remained on the US Supreme Court until his death, how exactly would he have ruled in Bush v. Gore? Would he have accepted George W. Bush's equal protection argument, albeit not Bush's proposed remedy?
>
> I'm asking this question because the Bush v. Gore majority actually did rely on Earl Warren's opinion in Reynolds v. Sims to help make their case/argument that Florida's recount violated equal protection. So, it would have actually been interesting to see the author of this opinion personally comment on this matter.
This seems more of a politics question rather than a what-if. Having Warren live an additional 26 years and still be on the Supreme Court at age 110 does not really seem plausible.

Re: Earl Warren and Bush v. Gore

<c84a7cea-d360-4053-a627-96ee688c6c7an@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=6329&group=alt.history.what-if#6329

  copy link   Newsgroups: alt.history.what-if
X-Received: by 2002:a37:a645:: with SMTP id p66mr1558080qke.499.1623272615861;
Wed, 09 Jun 2021 14:03:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:b225:: with SMTP id i37mr2798228ybj.120.1623272615739;
Wed, 09 Jun 2021 14:03:35 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: alt.history.what-if
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2021 14:03:35 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <22eb4466-f671-4679-8d2f-5e736898b4e6n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=68.228.73.154; posting-account=ZUrk_QoAAABZ9y2QYeTVPJa9mdyxu9a6
NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.228.73.154
References: <3d57715a-9196-4474-9d48-357a2e6f9168n@googlegroups.com> <22eb4466-f671-4679-8d2f-5e736898b4e6n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <c84a7cea-d360-4053-a627-96ee688c6c7an@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Earl Warren and Bush v. Gore
From: m4j...@gmail.com (WolfBear)
Injection-Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2021 21:03:35 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 by: WolfBear - Wed, 9 Jun 2021 21:03 UTC

On Wednesday, June 9, 2021 at 4:24:58 AM UTC-7, dama...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Monday, June 7, 2021 at 5:14:38 PM UTC-4, WolfBear wrote:
> > Had Earl Warren lived until age 110 and remained on the US Supreme Court until his death, how exactly would he have ruled in Bush v. Gore? Would he have accepted George W. Bush's equal protection argument, albeit not Bush's proposed remedy?
> >
> > I'm asking this question because the Bush v. Gore majority actually did rely on Earl Warren's opinion in Reynolds v. Sims to help make their case/argument that Florida's recount violated equal protection. So, it would have actually been interesting to see the author of this opinion personally comment on this matter.
> This seems more of a politics question rather than a what-if. Having Warren live an additional 26 years and still be on the Supreme Court at age 110 does not really seem plausible.

Plausible? No. But theoretically possible, at least if he has superhuman genes? Why not? After all, I believe that Irving Kahn was able to continue working until his death at age 109.

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.8
clearnet tor