The Fugitive Doctor lives on... Jo Martin returns on audio as The
Fugitive Doctor for some audio adventures.

https://www.bigfinish.com/news/v/jo-martin-brings-the-fugitive-doctor-to-audio

Big Finish also announce new audios with Sacha Dhawan's Master...

https://www.bigfinish.com/news/v/sacha-dhawan-is-the-master-of-audio-drama

Mo Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>
> The Fugitive Doctor lives on... Jo Martin returns on audio as The
> Fugitive Doctor for some audio adventures.
>
> https://www.bigfinish.com/news/v/jo-martin-brings-the-fugitive-doctor-to-audio
>
>
> Big Finish also announce new audios with Sacha Dhawan's Master...
>
> https://www.bigfinish.com/news/v/sacha-dhawan-is-the-master-of-audio-drama
>

That’s faster than I thought they would - usually the BBC waits till a
Doctor’s era is over before extending Big Finish’s licence to it.

But this is excellent news and doubtless we can look forward to Thirteenth
Doctor Adventures from next year (either with or without Jodie on board).
Just as long as it’s not Jacob Dudman doing the voice again. That would be
weird.

Ho hum, that’s another 88 quid spent …

--
There are some corners of the universe
which have bred the most terrible things.
Things which act against everything we believe in.

They must be /fought/.

The Last Doctor wrote:

> Mo Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
> >
> > The Fugitive Doctor lives on... Jo Martin returns on audio as The
> > Fugitive Doctor for some audio adventures.
> >
> >
https://www.bigfinish.com/news/v/jo-martin-brings-the-fugitive-doctor-to-audio
> >
> >
> > Big Finish also announce new audios with Sacha Dhawan's Master...
> >
> >
https://www.bigfinish.com/news/v/sacha-dhawan-is-the-master-of-audio-drama
> >
>
> That’s faster than I thought they would - usually the BBC waits till a
> Doctor’s era is over before extending Big Finish’s licence to it.
>
> But this is excellent news and doubtless we can look forward to
> Thirteenth Doctor Adventures from next year (either with or without
> Jodie on board). Just as long as it’s not Jacob Dudman doing the
> voice again. That would be weird.
>
> Ho hum, that’s another 88 quid spent …

I wasn't expecting anything from this era of the show (13th Doctor)
before the centenary special to be honest. These announcements caught
me on the hop.

It also now means that if the BF licence can include elements from
Jodies's era we can't be too far away from other 13th Doctor spin-off
audios... Jericho? Bel and Vinder? ????

Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
> The Last Doctor wrote:
>
>> Mo Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>
>>> The Fugitive Doctor lives on... Jo Martin returns on audio as The
>>> Fugitive Doctor for some audio adventures.
>>>
>>>
> https://www.bigfinish.com/news/v/jo-martin-brings-the-fugitive-doctor-to-audio
>>>
>>>
>>> Big Finish also announce new audios with Sacha Dhawan's Master...
>>>
>>>
> https://www.bigfinish.com/news/v/sacha-dhawan-is-the-master-of-audio-drama
>>>
>>
>> That’s faster than I thought they would - usually the BBC waits till a
>> Doctor’s era is over before extending Big Finish’s licence to it.
>>
>> But this is excellent news and doubtless we can look forward to
>> Thirteenth Doctor Adventures from next year (either with or without
>> Jodie on board). Just as long as it’s not Jacob Dudman doing the
>> voice again. That would be weird.
>>
>> Ho hum, that’s another 88 quid spent …
>
> I wasn't expecting anything from this era of the show (13th Doctor)
> before the centenary special to be honest. These announcements caught
> me on the hop.
>
> It also now means that if the BF licence can include elements from
> Jodies's era we can't be too far away from other 13th Doctor spin-off
> audios... Jericho? Bel and Vinder? ????
>

Jericho and Strax. A successor to Jago and Litefoot?

--
There are some corners of the universe
which have bred the most terrible things.
Things which act against everything we believe in.

They must be /fought/.

The Last Doctor wrote:

> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
> >
> > It also now means that if the BF licence can include elements from
> > Jodies's era we can't be too far away from other 13th Doctor
> > spin-off audios... Jericho? Bel and Vinder? ????
>
> Jericho and Strax. A successor to Jago and Litefoot?

I'd buy them! "Jericho & Strax" adventures would be fun...

"The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:t41got$tv8$39@gallifrey.nk.ca...
> In article <t41c62$pg0$1@dont-email.me>,
> The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>>Mo Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>
>>> The Fugitive Doctor lives on... Jo Martin returns on audio as The
>>> Fugitive Doctor for some audio adventures.
>>>
>>> https://www.bigfinish.com/news/v/jo-martin-brings-the-fugitive-doctor-to-audio
>>>
>>>
>>> Big Finish also announce new audios with Sacha Dhawan's Master...
>>>
>>> https://www.bigfinish.com/news/v/sacha-dhawan-is-the-master-of-audio-drama
>>>
>>
>>That�?Ts faster than I thought they would - usually the BBC waits till a
>>Doctor�?Ts era is over before extending Big Finish�?Ts licence to it.
>>
>>But this is excellent news and doubtless we can look forward to Thirteenth
>>Doctor Adventures from next year (either with or without Jodie on board).
>>Just as long as it�?Ts not Jacob Dudman doing the voice again. That would
>>be
>>weird.
>>
>>Ho hum, that�?Ts another 88 quid spent �?�
>>
>
> Your quid, not mine.

Of course. At least we actually have money. You don't get enough pocket
money to afford such things.

The Doctor wrote:

> In article <t41bkb$l12$1@dont-email.me>,
> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
> >
> > The Fugitive Doctor lives on... Jo Martin returns on audio as The
> > Fugitive Doctor for some audio adventures.
> >
> >
https://www.bigfinish.com/news/v/jo-martin-brings-the-fugitive-doctor-to-audio
> >
> >
> > Big Finish also announce new audios with Sacha Dhawan's Master...
> >
> >
https://www.bigfinish.com/news/v/sacha-dhawan-is-the-master-of-audio-drama
>
> Bad news.

Why is it bad news? You don't have to buy those audios if they don't
interest you.

Not that you probably buy much - if any - of BF's output anyway!

If you don't like the idea of Fugitive Doctor Adventures, ignore them.
Simples.

"The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:t41h7n$tv8$54@gallifrey.nk.ca...
> In article <t41h0q$19t$1@dont-email.me>,
> The Other Doctor <stephen.wilson2004nospam@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>
>>"The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>>news:t41got$tv8$39@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>>> In article <t41c62$pg0$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>>>>Mo Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> The Fugitive Doctor lives on... Jo Martin returns on audio as The
>>>>> Fugitive Doctor for some audio adventures.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>https://www.bigfinish.com/news/v/jo-martin-brings-the-fugitive-doctor-to-audio
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Big Finish also announce new audios with Sacha Dhawan's Master...
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.bigfinish.com/news/v/sacha-dhawan-is-the-master-of-audio-drama
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>That�?Ts faster than I thought they would - usually the BBC waits till a
>>>>Doctor�?Ts era is over before extending Big Finish�?Ts licence to it.
>>>>
>>>>But this is excellent news and doubtless we can look forward to
>>>>Thirteenth
>>>>Doctor Adventures from next year (either with or without Jodie on
>>>>board).
>>>>Just as long as it�?Ts not Jacob Dudman doing the voice again. That
>>>>would
>>>>be
>>>>weird.
>>>>
>>>>Ho hum, that�?Ts another 88 quid spent �?�
>>>>
>>>
>>> Your quid, not mine.
>>
>>Of course. At least we actually have money. You don't get enough pocket
>>money to afford such things.
>>
>>
>
> Try building a ZFS based server.

Why would I want to do that, Yads? Why would ANYONE want to do that, Yads?
If I was going to have a server, I'd want one that could detect and prevent
data corruption. I could mention plenty of additional deficiencies. But I
won't. I don't need to build a server.I don't know if you do, but I'd
suggest you get someone who know what they're doing. Because you clearly
don't.

The Doctor wrote:

> In article <e63b3175-5685-402a-b617-5f487a5f3815n@googlegroups.com>,
> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbrueni@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Saturday, April 23, 2022 at 10:25:04 AM UTC-7, Blueshirt wrote:
> >> The Last Doctor wrote:
> >> > Mo Blueshirt <blue...@indigo.news> wrote:
> >>
> >> It also now means that if the BF licence can include elements from
> >> Jodies's era we can't be too far away from other 13th Doctor
> >> spin-off audios... Jericho? Bel and Vinder? ????
> >
> > How about an Ood led Division, working to recreate the universe?
>
> How about junking the Timeless Child Arc all together!

Move on Dave, the BBC and Doctor Who are moving forward... the 14th
Doctor is on their way.

tsbru...@gmail.com wrote:

> 25 5 5 On Saturday, April 23, 2022 at 5:38:12 PM UTC-7,
> netk...@gmail.com wrote:
> > How about junking the Timeless Child Arc all together!
>
> The would eliminate the BF Fugitive Doctor series!!

It's not going to be junked Tim... it might live on at Big Finish but I
fully expect RTD to ignore it. Which is probably why Big Finish are
allowed to continue Fugitive Doctor adventures on audio.

The Doctor wrote:

> In article <t437bp$8c3$1@dont-email.me>,
> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
> > The Doctor wrote:
> >>
> >> How about junking the Timeless Child Arc all together!
> >
> > Move on Dave, the BBC and Doctor Who are moving forward... the 14th
> > Doctor is on their way.
>
> OR the REAL 13th Doctor!

No Dave... the next Doctor will be the 14th Doctor.

The Doctor wrote:

> In article <t437hd$9in$1@dont-email.me>,
> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
> > tsbru...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> >> 25 5 5 On Saturday, April 23, 2022 at 5:38:12 PM UTC-7,
> >> netk...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> > How about junking the Timeless Child Arc all together!
> >>
> >> The would eliminate the BF Fugitive Doctor series!!
> >
> > It's not going to be junked Tim... it might live on at Big Finish
> > but I fully expect RTD to ignore it. Which is probably why Big
> > Finish are allowed to continue Fugitive Doctor adventures on audio.
>
> For the good of the audience, it should be junked.

In your opinion...

"The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:t43gm4$1270$3@gallifrey.nk.ca...
> In article <t43g4j$7o3$3@dont-email.me>,
> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>The Doctor wrote:
>>
>>> In article <t437hd$9in$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>> > tsbru...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> 25 5 5 On Saturday, April 23, 2022 at 5:38:12 PM UTC-7,
>>> >> netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> >> > How about junking the Timeless Child Arc all together!
>>> >>
>>> >> The would eliminate the BF Fugitive Doctor series!!
>>> >
>>> > It's not going to be junked Tim... it might live on at Big Finish
>>> > but I fully expect RTD to ignore it. Which is probably why Big
>>> > Finish are allowed to continue Fugitive Doctor adventures on audio.
>>>
>>> For the good of the audience, it should be junked.
>>
>>In your opinion...
>
> You can always say IYIO.

Liar! That's just one of your idiotic acronyms that nobody else would use,
or understand. Anybody else would say "in your opinon"

"The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:t43gkp$1270$1@gallifrey.nk.ca...
> In article <t43g4i$7o3$1@dont-email.me>,
> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>The Doctor wrote:
>>
>>> In article <t437bp$8c3$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>> > The Doctor wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> How about junking the Timeless Child Arc all together!
>>> >
>>> > Move on Dave, the BBC and Doctor Who are moving forward... the 14th
>>> > Doctor is on their way.
>>>
>>> OR the REAL 13th Doctor!
>>
>>No Dave... the next Doctor will be the 14th Doctor.
>
> No if the Timeless Child is retconned!

Liar! The next Doctor will be the 14th Doctor no matter how much retconning
you want to do.

"The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:t43esg$8km$89@gallifrey.nk.ca...
> In article <t437bp$8c3$1@dont-email.me>,
> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>The Doctor wrote:
>>
>>> In article <e63b3175-5685-402a-b617-5f487a5f3815n@googlegroups.com>,
>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbrueni@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > On Saturday, April 23, 2022 at 10:25:04 AM UTC-7, Blueshirt wrote:
>>> >> The Last Doctor wrote:
>>> >> > Mo Blueshirt <blue...@indigo.news> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> It also now means that if the BF licence can include elements from
>>> >> Jodies's era we can't be too far away from other 13th Doctor
>>> >> spin-off audios... Jericho? Bel and Vinder? ????
>>> >
>>> > How about an Ood led Division, working to recreate the universe?
>>>
>>> How about junking the Timeless Child Arc all together!
>>
>>Move on Dave, the BBC and Doctor Who are moving forward... the 14th
>>Doctor is on their way.
>
> OR the REAL 13th Doctor!

Jodie Whittaker played the 13th Doctor. The next actor will be playing the
14th Doctor. It really doesn't make any difference how you want them to be
numbered. And none of them are real. It's fiction, Yads.

Even if you assumed William Hartnell really was the 1st Doctor, RTD changed
everything when David Tennant regenerated into David Tennant. Moffat changed
everything again when he inserted William Hurt inbetween McGann and
Eccleston.

"The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:t44inu$2thr$8@gallifrey.nk.ca...
> In article <t43n0n$rim$1@dont-email.me>,
> The Other Doctor <stephen.wilson2004nospam@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>
>>"The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>>news:t43esg$8km$89@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>>> In article <t437bp$8c3$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>>The Doctor wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <e63b3175-5685-402a-b617-5f487a5f3815n@googlegroups.com>,
>>>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbrueni@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> > On Saturday, April 23, 2022 at 10:25:04 AM UTC-7, Blueshirt wrote:
>>>>> >> The Last Doctor wrote:
>>>>> >> > Mo Blueshirt <blue...@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> It also now means that if the BF licence can include elements from
>>>>> >> Jodies's era we can't be too far away from other 13th Doctor
>>>>> >> spin-off audios... Jericho? Bel and Vinder? ????
>>>>> >
>>>>> > How about an Ood led Division, working to recreate the universe?
>>>>>
>>>>> How about junking the Timeless Child Arc all together!
>>>>
>>>>Move on Dave, the BBC and Doctor Who are moving forward... the 14th
>>>>Doctor is on their way.
>>>
>>> OR the REAL 13th Doctor!
>>
>>Jodie Whittaker played the 13th Doctor. The next actor will be playing the
>>14th Doctor. It really doesn't make any difference how you want them to be
>>numbered. And none of them are real. It's fiction, Yads.
>>
>>Even if you assumed William Hartnell really was the 1st Doctor, RTD
>>changed
>>everything when David Tennant regenerated into David Tennant. Moffat
>>changed
>>everything again when he inserted William Hurt inbetween McGann and
>>Eccleston.
>>
>>
>
> The timelss Child is anti-Doctor-Who!

Liar! Yads is anti-Doctor Who.

tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbrueni@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sunday, April 24, 2022 at 3:07:43 AM UTC-7, Blueshirt wrote:
>> tsbru...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>> 25 5 5 On Saturday, April 23, 2022 at 5:38:12 PM UTC-7,
>>> netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>> How about junking the Timeless Child Arc all together!
>>>
>>> The would eliminate the BF Fugitive Doctor series!!
>> It's not going to be junked Tim... it might live on at Big Finish but I
>> fully expect RTD to ignore it. Which is probably why Big Finish are
>> allowed to continue Fugitive Doctor adventures on audio.
>
> I assumed that at some point, the Doctor would ask the TARDIS to return
> her fob watch to her, at which point she would open it, and we would
> learn the full story of the Timeless Child! I assumed that she had the
> TARDIS hide it because she didn't think that she was ready to cope with
> her pre-Hartnell memories! I am expecting that at some point, she will feel able to cope!
>

You can assume and expect all you want Tim. However, if it doesn’t come up
in the BBC centenary special, then here’s the situation:

Chris Chibnall introduced the Timeless Child and the Division.

Most of the narrative about that would have taken place before the Hartnell
era.

Chris Chibnall showed us the end of the Division.

Chris Chibnall showed us the Doctor becoming aware of her Timeless Child
heritage, gaining access to it (in the form of a Gallifreyan “fob watch”
memory storage device), and choosing to lock that information safely away
rather than face it and learn it.

Therefore: future showrunners can completely ignore it until or unless
/they/ want to tell a story that brings it back into focus. /Your/
assumptions, expectations and desires will not be taken into account.

-- I
There are some corners of the universe
which have bred the most terrible things.
Things which act against everything we believe in.

They must be /fought/.

The Other Doctor wrote on 25/4/22 12:26 am:
> "The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
> news:t43gm4$1270$3@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>> In article <t43g4j$7o3$3@dont-email.me>, Blueshirt
>> <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>> In article <t437hd$9in$1@dont-email.me>, Blueshirt
>>>> <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>>> tsbru...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>> 25 5 5 On Saturday, April 23, 2022 at 5:38:12 PM UTC-7,
>>>>>> netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>> How about junking the Timeless Child Arc all together!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The would eliminate the BF Fugitive Doctor series!!
>>>>>
>>>>> It's not going to be junked Tim... it might live on at Big
>>>>> Finish but I fully expect RTD to ignore it. Which is probably
>>>>> why Big Finish are allowed to continue Fugitive Doctor
>>>>> adventures on audio.
>>>>
>>>> For the good of the audience, it should be junked.
>>>
>>> In your opinion...
>>
>> You can always say IYIO.
>
> Liar! That's just one of your idiotic acronyms that nobody else would
> use, or understand. Anybody else would say "in your opinon"

I've always wondered what the clowns second 'I' stood for?? Informed??
Imagined?? Ignored??
--
Daniel

tsbr...@gmail.com wrote on 25/4/22 2:38 am:
> On Sunday, April 24, 2022 at 7:26:32 AM UTC-7, The Other Doctor
> wrote:
>> "The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>> news:t43gkp$1270$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>>> In article <t43g4i$7o3$1...@dont-email.me>, Blueshirt
>>> <blue...@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>>> In article <t437bp$8c3$1...@dont-email.me>, Blueshirt
>>>>> <blue...@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> How about junking the Timeless Child Arc all together!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Move on Dave, the BBC and Doctor Who are moving forward...
>>>>>> the 14th Doctor is on their way.
>>>>>
>>>>> OR the REAL 13th Doctor!
>>>>
>>>> No Dave... the next Doctor will be the 14th Doctor.
>>>
>>> No if the Timeless Child is retconned!
>> Liar! The next Doctor will be the 14th Doctor no matter how much
>> retconning you want to do.
>
> Yads is envisioning a Dallas style shower scene.

Yads is too thick to realise IT WILL NOT HAPPEN!!
--
Daniel

The Doctor wrote on 25/4/22 8:24 am:
> In article <t43mmm$p5o$1@dont-email.me>, The Other Doctor
> <stephen.wilson2004nospam@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>> "The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>> news:t43gkp$1270$1@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>>> In article <t43g4i$7o3$1@dont-email.me>, Blueshirt
>>> <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>>> In article <t437bp$8c3$1@dont-email.me>, Blueshirt
>>>>> <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> How about junking the Timeless Child Arc all together!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Move on Dave, the BBC and Doctor Who are moving forward...
>>>>>> the 14th Doctor is on their way.
>>>>>
>>>>> OR the REAL 13th Doctor!
>>>>
>>>> No Dave... the next Doctor will be the 14th Doctor.
>>>
>>> No if the Timeless Child is retconned!
>>
>> Liar! The next Doctor will be the 14th Doctor no matter how much
>> retconning you want to do.
>
> And if the Timeless Child is Retcon, I can see SW being on a violent
> rampage.

What does the "SW being" look like, clown??

Oh! And by the way, clown .... (AKJV) Luke 6:42 Either how canst thou
say to thy brother, Brother, let me pull out the mote that is in thine
eye, when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then
shalt thou see clearly to pull out the mote that is in thy brother’s eye.
--
Daniel

The Doctor wrote on 24/4/22 9:27 am:
> In article <6ab8505b-4d48-44d3-90da-040f009bc688n@googlegroups.com>,
> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbrueni@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Saturday, April 23, 2022 at 10:05:18 AM UTC-7, Blueshirt wrote:
>>> The Fugitive Doctor lives on... Jo Martin returns on audio as
>>> The Fugitive Doctor for some audio adventures.
>>>
>> https://www.bigfinish.com/news/v/jo-martin-brings-the-fugitive-doctor-to-audio
>>
>> Big Finish also announce new audios with Sacha Dhawan's Master...
>>>
>>> https://www.bigfinish.com/news/v/sacha-dhawan-is-the-master-of-audio-drama
>>
>>> Complete with CyberLords?
>
> Timeess Child trash!

"Timeess"??
--
Daniel

Daniel65 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
> The Other Doctor wrote on 25/4/22 12:26 am:
>> "The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>> news:t43gm4$1270$3@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>>> In article <t43g4j$7o3$3@dont-email.me>, Blueshirt
>>> <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>>> In article <t437hd$9in$1@dont-email.me>, Blueshirt
>>>>> <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>>>> tsbru...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>> 25 5 5 On Saturday, April 23, 2022 at 5:38:12 PM UTC-7,
>>>>>>> netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>> How about junking the Timeless Child Arc all together!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The would eliminate the BF Fugitive Doctor series!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's not going to be junked Tim... it might live on at Big
>>>>>> Finish but I fully expect RTD to ignore it. Which is probably
>>>>>> why Big Finish are allowed to continue Fugitive Doctor
>>>>>> adventures on audio.
>>>>>
>>>>> For the good of the audience, it should be junked.
>>>>
>>>> In your opinion...
>>>
>>> You can always say IYIO.
>>
>> Liar! That's just one of your idiotic acronyms that nobody else would
>> use, or understand. Anybody else would say "in your opinon"
>
> I've always wondered what the clowns second 'I' stood for?? Informed??
> Imagined?? Ignored??

It’s an asymmetric abbreviation.

When used BY Dave, the second “i” stands for “informed” (irrespective of
what Dave thinks he means by it. Because I have yet to see a poster to this
newsgroup who isn’t better informed than Dave).

If ever addressed TO Dave, however, the second “i” would have to pivot and
become “ignorant” (there is no poster to this newsgroup more ignorant than
Dave, and the only one who comes close has Dave killfiled).

--
There are some corners of the universe
which have bred the most terrible things.
Things which act against everything we believe in.

They must be /fought/.

"Daniel65" <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote in message
news:t463t3$omc$1@dont-email.me...
> The Other Doctor wrote on 25/4/22 12:26 am:
>> "The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>> news:t43gm4$1270$3@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>>> In article <t43g4j$7o3$3@dont-email.me>, Blueshirt
>>> <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>>> In article <t437hd$9in$1@dont-email.me>, Blueshirt
>>>>> <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>>>> tsbru...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>> 25 5 5 On Saturday, April 23, 2022 at 5:38:12 PM UTC-7,
>>>>>>> netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>> How about junking the Timeless Child Arc all together!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The would eliminate the BF Fugitive Doctor series!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's not going to be junked Tim... it might live on at Big
>>>>>> Finish but I fully expect RTD to ignore it. Which is probably
>>>>>> why Big Finish are allowed to continue Fugitive Doctor
>>>>>> adventures on audio.
>>>>>
>>>>> For the good of the audience, it should be junked.
>>>>
>>>> In your opinion...
>>>
>>> You can always say IYIO.
>>
>> Liar! That's just one of your idiotic acronyms that nobody else would
>> use, or understand. Anybody else would say "in your opinon"
>
> I've always wondered what the clowns second 'I' stood for?? Informed??
> Imagined?? Ignored??

I think he once claimed it stood for "Important". Which is just another
example of the strange way his brain works.

"Daniel65" <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote in message
news:t464ab$omc$3@dont-email.me...
> The Doctor wrote on 25/4/22 8:24 am:
>> In article <t43mmm$p5o$1@dont-email.me>, The Other Doctor
>> <stephen.wilson2004nospam@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>> "The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>>> news:t43gkp$1270$1@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>>>> In article <t43g4i$7o3$1@dont-email.me>, Blueshirt
>>>> <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>>>> In article <t437bp$8c3$1@dont-email.me>, Blueshirt
>>>>>> <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> How about junking the Timeless Child Arc all together!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Move on Dave, the BBC and Doctor Who are moving forward...
>>>>>>> the 14th Doctor is on their way.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> OR the REAL 13th Doctor!
>>>>>
>>>>> No Dave... the next Doctor will be the 14th Doctor.
>>>>
>>>> No if the Timeless Child is retconned!
>>>
>>> Liar! The next Doctor will be the 14th Doctor no matter how much
>>> retconning you want to do.
>>
>> And if the Timeless Child is Retcon, I can see SW being on a violent
>> rampage.
>
> What does the "SW being" look like, clown??

The only person in radw who threatens violence to anyone is Yads.

"The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:t469kq$1efs$39@gallifrey.nk.ca...
> In article <d015f3e3-c9cf-4f59-bf05-dabd9ca942a3n@googlegroups.com>,
> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbrueni@gmail.com> wrote:
>>On Sunday, April 24, 2022 at 3:07:43 AM UTC-7, Blueshirt wrote:
>>> tsbru...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>> > 25 5 5 On Saturday, April 23, 2022 at 5:38:12 PM UTC-7,
>>> > netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> > > How about junking the Timeless Child Arc all together!
>>> >
>>> > The would eliminate the BF Fugitive Doctor series!!
>>> It's not going to be junked Tim... it might live on at Big Finish but I
>>> fully expect RTD to ignore it. Which is probably why Big Finish are
>>> allowed to continue Fugitive Doctor adventures on audio.
>>
>>I assumed that at some point, the Doctor would ask the TARDIS to return
>>her fob watch to her, at which point she would open it, and we would
>>learn the full story of the Timeless Child! I assumed that she had the
>>TARDIS hide it because she didn't think that she was ready to cope with
>>her pre-Hartnell memories! I am expecting that at some point, she will
>>feel able to cope!
>
> Hence why I no longer will view BF as entertainment.

You don't view BF. You listen to BF. When was the last time you heard a BF
audio?

Nobody cares whether you "view" BF as entertainment or not, Yads. Your
opinion is irrelevant.