The Doctor wrote on 26/4/22 12:20 am:
> In article <t462u1$glh$1@dont-email.me>,
> Daniel65 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:

<Snip>

>> I'm no great expert but .... Stephen, what about India, Ceylon,
>> Caribbean Islands, etc??
>>
>> Or do only the Big, 'White' countries count??
>
> Non-Republic!

So are YOU, clown, now suggesting that India and South Africa would now
miss out, as they are now Republics, clown??
--
Daniel

"Daniel65" <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote in message
news:t48mkv$mgn$1@dont-email.me...
> The Doctor wrote on 26/4/22 7:27 am:
>> In article <t46crv$420$1@dont-email.me>, The Other Doctor
>> <stephen.wilson2004nospam@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>> "The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>>> news:t46bh7$1efs$94@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>>>> In article <t46b1s$jro$1@dont-email.me>, The Other Doctor
>>>> <stephen.wilson2004nospam@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>>>> "The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>>>>> news:t46aer$1efs$55@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I have seen strong pople over the age of 90.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But was The Queen one of those 'strong people', clown??
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think she is, Dannyboy!
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah, but you're weird. Nobody else does. "Queen, 95, has
>>>>> become so frail she's unable to walk her beloved corgis, aides
>>>>> say." "Frail Queen leaves Brits in tears as she attends today's
>>>>> Prince Philip memorial service." "The Queen arrives at Prince
>>>>> Philip memorial looking frail as she uses walking stick." Etc.
>>>>
>>>> And is still viewed in public.
>>>
>>> And is frail. Not strong.
>>
>> Still I wouldn ot mess with an ex-military driver.
>
> "wouldn"?? "ot"??
>
> "an ex-military driver"?? What?? 75 or so years ago!!

Is it just me, or is there something rather bizarre about Yads' statement?
Apart from the typos, I mean.

1. The Queen was a mechanic and driver. Not a soldier. And never placed in
anything even approaching danger.
2. Being a driver doesn't make you fit. If anything, it's the reverse.
3. Being in the military back in 1944 doesn't mean you're something special
in 2022.
4. Yads wouldn't mess with an ex-military driver. Does that mean he'd
happily mess with the Queen if she wasn't an ex-military driver?
5. If you tried to mess with the Queen, you'd probably be shot.
6. How many other people does Yads dream of messing with?

tsbr...@gmail.com wrote on 26/4/22 10:20 pm:
> On Tuesday, April 26, 2022 at 5:16:33 AM UTC-7, Daniel65 wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 26/4/22 7:23 am:
>>> In article <t46cg3$t5$1...@dont-email.me>,
>>> solar penguin <solar....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Binky bleated:
>>>>> In article <t45hvf$gio$1...@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> The Other Doctor <stephen.wils...@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>>>>> "The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:t44ils$2thr$6...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>>>>>>> In article <t43mlg$otg$1...@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>> The Other Doctor <stephen.wils...@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> "The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:t43glh$1270$2...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Her mum lived to 101 !
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So what? Believe it or not, but not all children die
>>>>>>>> at the same age as one of their parents.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Depnds on the longevity record.
>>>>
>>>> Liar! That’s not what you posted!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Liar!
>>>>>
>>>>> so who is the oldest man and woman on the planet?
>>>>
>>>> Who “is†, singular? You mean the same person is both
>>>> the oldest man and woman? That sounds interesting!
>>>
>>> Got me Sp. Mind you the oldest man at 199 did just die in Japan.
>> BULLSHIT, I call BULLSHIT!!
>>
>> No-one has ever EVER lived over 125 years, clown, indeed Wikipedia
>> records the oldest human at just 122 years, 164 days old when *SHE*
>> died, clown!!
>>
>> Oldest ever Man was a mere 116 years, 54 days!!
>
> I could have sworn that I once heard about a 120 year old Japanese man, who had also worked for 98 years from age 7 to age 105.
>>
>> Nowhere near 199 years, clown!!
>>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oldest_people
>
> I just heard about a 119 year old woman dying.

Yes, she was the oldest person living at that time .... until she died!!
--
Daniel

"The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:t48tdi$q9t$82@gallifrey.nk.ca...
> In article <t48p0r$aje$1@dont-email.me>,
> The Other Doctor <stephen.wilson2004nospam@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>
>>"Daniel65" <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote in message
>>news:t48mkv$mgn$1@dont-email.me...
>>> The Doctor wrote on 26/4/22 7:27 am:
>>>> In article <t46crv$420$1@dont-email.me>, The Other Doctor
>>>> <stephen.wilson2004nospam@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>>>> "The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>>>>> news:t46bh7$1efs$94@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>>>>>> In article <t46b1s$jro$1@dont-email.me>, The Other Doctor
>>>>>> <stephen.wilson2004nospam@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> "The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:t46aer$1efs$55@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I have seen strong pople over the age of 90.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> But was The Queen one of those 'strong people', clown??
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I think she is, Dannyboy!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yeah, but you're weird. Nobody else does. "Queen, 95, has
>>>>>>> become so frail she's unable to walk her beloved corgis, aides
>>>>>>> say." "Frail Queen leaves Brits in tears as she attends today's
>>>>>>> Prince Philip memorial service." "The Queen arrives at Prince
>>>>>>> Philip memorial looking frail as she uses walking stick." Etc.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And is still viewed in public.
>>>>>
>>>>> And is frail. Not strong.
>>>>
>>>> Still I wouldn ot mess with an ex-military driver.
>>>
>>> "wouldn"?? "ot"??
>>>
>>> "an ex-military driver"?? What?? 75 or so years ago!!
>>
>>Is it just me, or is there something rather bizarre about Yads' statement?
>>Apart from the typos, I mean.
>>
>>1. The Queen was a mechanic and driver. Not a soldier. And never placed in
>>anything even approaching danger.
>>2. Being a driver doesn't make you fit. If anything, it's the reverse.
>>3. Being in the military back in 1944 doesn't mean you're something
>>special
>>in 2022.
>>4. Yads wouldn't mess with an ex-military driver. Does that mean he'd
>>happily mess with the Queen if she wasn't an ex-military driver?
>>5. If you tried to mess with the Queen, you'd probably be shot.
>>6. How many other people does Yads dream of messing with?
>>
>>
>
> Well Wilson I defend constitutional monarchies!
> Repbulics are failed natios. Does that give you a clue!

No. What's a repbulic? What's a failed natio?
Oh yeah. You can't type. You meant to say "Republics are failed nations."
Which is just another of your lies.

The Other Doctor <stephen.wilson2004nospam@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>
> "The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
> news:t48tdi$q9t$82@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>> In article <t48p0r$aje$1@dont-email.me>,
>> The Other Doctor <stephen.wilson2004nospam@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> "Daniel65" <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote in message
>>> news:t48mkv$mgn$1@dont-email.me...
>>>> The Doctor wrote on 26/4/22 7:27 am:
>>>>> In article <t46crv$420$1@dont-email.me>, The Other Doctor
>>>>> <stephen.wilson2004nospam@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>>>>> "The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:t46bh7$1efs$94@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>>>>>>> In article <t46b1s$jro$1@dont-email.me>, The Other Doctor
>>>>>>> <stephen.wilson2004nospam@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> "The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:t46aer$1efs$55@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I have seen strong pople over the age of 90.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> But was The Queen one of those 'strong people', clown??
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I think she is, Dannyboy!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yeah, but you're weird. Nobody else does. "Queen, 95, has
>>>>>>>> become so frail she's unable to walk her beloved corgis, aides
>>>>>>>> say." "Frail Queen leaves Brits in tears as she attends today's
>>>>>>>> Prince Philip memorial service." "The Queen arrives at Prince
>>>>>>>> Philip memorial looking frail as she uses walking stick." Etc.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And is still viewed in public.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And is frail. Not strong.
>>>>>
>>>>> Still I wouldn ot mess with an ex-military driver.
>>>>
>>>> "wouldn"?? "ot"??
>>>>
>>>> "an ex-military driver"?? What?? 75 or so years ago!!
>>>
>>> Is it just me, or is there something rather bizarre about Yads' statement?
>>> Apart from the typos, I mean.
>>>
>>> 1. The Queen was a mechanic and driver. Not a soldier. And never placed in
>>> anything even approaching danger.
>>> 2. Being a driver doesn't make you fit. If anything, it's the reverse.
>>> 3. Being in the military back in 1944 doesn't mean you're something
>>> special
>>> in 2022.
>>> 4. Yads wouldn't mess with an ex-military driver. Does that mean he'd
>>> happily mess with the Queen if she wasn't an ex-military driver?
>>> 5. If you tried to mess with the Queen, you'd probably be shot.
>>> 6. How many other people does Yads dream of messing with?
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Well Wilson I defend constitutional monarchies!
>> Repbulics are failed natios. Does that give you a clue!
>
> No. What's a repbulic? What's a failed natio?
> Oh yeah. You can't type. You meant to say "Republics are failed nations."
> Which is just another of your lies.

In any case, what does the status of a nation have to do with whether a 96
year old woman (who has recently lost her husband and emotional support of
75 years, has recently had COVID, and can no longer perform most of her
beloved public duties due to difficulties in moving) is frail or strong?

--
There are some corners of the universe
which have bred the most terrible things.
Things which act against everything we believe in.

They must be /fought/.

The Doctor wrote on 27/04/2022 6:46 am:
> In article <t48u2j$jq8$1@dont-email.me>, The Other Doctor
> <stephen.wilson2004nospam@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>> "The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>> news:t48tdi$q9t$82@gallifrey.nk.ca...

<Snip>

>>> Well Wilson I defend constitutional monarchies! Repbulics are
>>> failed natios. Does that give you a clue!
>>
>> No. What's a repbulic? What's a failed natio? Oh yeah. You can't
>> type. You meant to say "Republics are failed nations." Which is
>> just another of your lies.
>
> Soory why the elites just making the ordinary person suffer ....

"Soory"?? Any half intelligent person, realising that he'd just been
picked up for his pathetic spelling abilities, might just double-check
his post *BEFORE* pressing the 'Send' button!!

But not our clown!!

Oh! And by the way, clown .... (AKJV) Luke 6:42 Either how canst thou
say to thy brother, Brother, let me pull out the mote that is in thine
eye, when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then
shalt thou see clearly to pull out the mote that is in thy brother’s eye.
--
Daniel

The Doctor wrote on 26/04/2022 11:48 pm:
> In article <t48o4m$vvs$3@dont-email.me>,
> Daniel65 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 26/4/22 7:22 am:
>>
>> <Snip>
>>
>>> Ever though Borwn was the first to make mention of this.
>>
>> "Borwn"?? Who the hell is that, clown??

> Do you recall Gordon Brown?

Yes, clown, former PM of GB, clown, but I was asking who the 'Borwn" was
that you referred to, clown!!

Oh! And by the way, clown .... (AKJV) Luke 6:42 Either how canst thou
say to thy brother, Brother, let me pull out the mote that is in thine
eye, when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then
shalt thou see clearly to pull out the mote that is in thy brother’s eye.
--
Daniel

"Daniel65" <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote in message
news:t4aqhu$536$1@dont-email.me...
>
> <Snip>
>
>>>> Well Wilson I defend constitutional monarchies! Repbulics are
>>>> failed natios. Does that give you a clue!
>>>
>>> No. What's a repbulic? What's a failed natio? Oh yeah. You can't
>>> type. You meant to say "Republics are failed nations." Which is
>>> just another of your lies.
>>
>> Soory why the elites just making the ordinary person suffer ....
>
> "Soory"?? Any half intelligent person, realising that he'd just been
> picked up for his pathetic spelling abilities, might just double-check his
> post *BEFORE* pressing the 'Send' button!!
>
> But not our clown!!

Wouldn't matter. Even if he got all the words right, his statement would
still make no sense. If he did mange to make it make sense, it would still
be irrelevant. Who's he calling an elite? How are the elites making the
"ordinary person" suffer? What make him think it happens any more in a
republic than it does in a constitutional monarcy? What is the monarch if
not one of the "elite" who are causing all the alleged suffering?

Sounds like Yads is really a communist to me...

The Other Doctor wrote on 27/4/22 6:15 pm:
> "Daniel65" <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote in message
> news:t4aqhu$536$1@dont-email.me...
>>
>> <Snip>
>>
>>>>> Well Wilson I defend constitutional monarchies! Repbulics
>>>>> are failed natios. Does that give you a clue!
>>>>
>>>> No. What's a repbulic? What's a failed natio? Oh yeah. You
>>>> can't type. You meant to say "Republics are failed nations."
>>>> Which is just another of your lies.
>>>
>>> Soory why the elites just making the ordinary person suffer ....
>>
>> "Soory"?? Any half intelligent person, realising that he'd just
>> been picked up for his pathetic spelling abilities, might just
>> double-check his post *BEFORE* pressing the 'Send' button!!
>>
>> But not our clown!!
>
> Wouldn't matter. Even if he got all the words right, his statement
> would still make no sense. If he did mange to make it make sense, it
> would still be irrelevant. Who's he calling an elite? How are the
> elites making the "ordinary person" suffer? What make him think it
> happens any more in a republic than it does in a constitutional
> monarcy? What is the monarch if not one of the "elite" who are
> causing all the alleged suffering?
>
> Sounds like Yads is really a communist to me...

Owwww! You might be on to something there, Stephen.

If the clown *IS* a communist ..... a Closet Communist what else might
the clown be doing in that closet??
--
Daniel

"The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:t4bi1b$1sgm$65@gallifrey.nk.ca...
> In article <t4au0j$sgn$1@dont-email.me>,
> The Other Doctor <stephen.wilson2004nospam@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>
>>"Daniel65" <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote in message
>>news:t4aqhu$536$1@dont-email.me...
>>>
>>> <Snip>
>>>
>>>>>> Well Wilson I defend constitutional monarchies! Repbulics are
>>>>>> failed natios. Does that give you a clue!
>>>>>
>>>>> No. What's a repbulic? What's a failed natio? Oh yeah. You can't
>>>>> type. You meant to say "Republics are failed nations." Which is
>>>>> just another of your lies.
>>>>
>>>> Soory why the elites just making the ordinary person suffer ....
>>>
>>> "Soory"?? Any half intelligent person, realising that he'd just been
>>> picked up for his pathetic spelling abilities, might just double-check
>>> his
>>> post *BEFORE* pressing the 'Send' button!!
>>>
>>> But not our clown!!
>>
>>Wouldn't matter. Even if he got all the words right, his statement would
>>still make no sense. If he did mange to make it make sense, it would still
>>be irrelevant. Who's he calling an elite? How are the elites making the
>>"ordinary person" suffer? What make him think it happens any more in a
>>republic than it does in a constitutional monarcy? What is the monarch if
>>not one of the "elite" who are causing all the alleged suffering?
>>
>>Sounds like Yads is really a communist to me...
>>
>>
>
> I am a constitutional monarchy! You Wilson OTOH,
> would fit the communist mould quite well.

Liar! You are not a monarchy of any kind.

"The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:t4bj3q$1sgm$100@gallifrey.nk.ca...
> In article <t4bi41$ors$1@dont-email.me>,
> The Other Doctor <stephen.wilson2004nospam@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>
>>"The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>>news:t4bi1b$1sgm$65@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>>> In article <t4au0j$sgn$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> The Other Doctor <stephen.wilson2004nospam@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>"Daniel65" <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote in message
>>>>news:t4aqhu$536$1@dont-email.me...
>>>>>
>>>>> <Snip>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Well Wilson I defend constitutional monarchies! Repbulics are
>>>>>>>> failed natios. Does that give you a clue!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No. What's a repbulic? What's a failed natio? Oh yeah. You can't
>>>>>>> type. You meant to say "Republics are failed nations." Which is
>>>>>>> just another of your lies.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Soory why the elites just making the ordinary person suffer ....
>>>>>
>>>>> "Soory"?? Any half intelligent person, realising that he'd just been
>>>>> picked up for his pathetic spelling abilities, might just double-check
>>>>> his
>>>>> post *BEFORE* pressing the 'Send' button!!
>>>>>
>>>>> But not our clown!!
>>>>
>>>>Wouldn't matter. Even if he got all the words right, his statement would
>>>>still make no sense. If he did mange to make it make sense, it would
>>>>still
>>>>be irrelevant. Who's he calling an elite? How are the elites making the
>>>>"ordinary person" suffer? What make him think it happens any more in a
>>>>republic than it does in a constitutional monarcy? What is the monarch
>>>>if
>>>>not one of the "elite" who are causing all the alleged suffering?
>>>>
>>>>Sounds like Yads is really a communist to me...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> I am a constitutional monarchy! You Wilson OTOH,
>>> would fit the communist mould quite well.
>>
>>Liar! You are not a monarchy of any kind.
>>
>>
>
> Constitution Monarchy with PArliamentary Democracy
> is best form of government given all the other options.

Liar. It's called a consitutional monarchy. And you've absolutely no idea
why you think it's better than any other option. You don't know or
understand what the other options are.

On 2022-04-27 7:55 a.m., The Doctor wrote:
> In article <t4au0j$sgn$1@dont-email.me>,
> The Other Doctor <stephen.wilson2004nospam@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>
>> "Daniel65" <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote in message
>> news:t4aqhu$536$1@dont-email.me...
>>>
>>> <Snip>
>>>
>>>>>> Well Wilson I defend constitutional monarchies! Repbulics are
>>>>>> failed natios. Does that give you a clue!
>>>>>
>>>>> No. What's a repbulic? What's a failed natio? Oh yeah. You can't
>>>>> type. You meant to say "Republics are failed nations." Which is
>>>>> just another of your lies.
>>>>
>>>> Soory why the elites just making the ordinary person suffer ....
>>>
>>> "Soory"?? Any half intelligent person, realising that he'd just been
>>> picked up for his pathetic spelling abilities, might just double-check his
>>> post *BEFORE* pressing the 'Send' button!!
>>>
>>> But not our clown!!
>>
>> Wouldn't matter. Even if he got all the words right, his statement would
>> still make no sense. If he did mange to make it make sense, it would still
>> be irrelevant. Who's he calling an elite? How are the elites making the
>> "ordinary person" suffer? What make him think it happens any more in a
>> republic than it does in a constitutional monarcy? What is the monarch if
>> not one of the "elite" who are causing all the alleged suffering?
>>
>> Sounds like Yads is really a communist to me...
>>
>>
>
> I am a constitutional monarchy! You Wilson OTOH,
> would fit the communist mould quite well.

You really don't understand the words you throw around do you binky? Do
you think you look intelligent while you do this?

The laughter you can't hear would tell you different.

--
The very powerful and very stupid have one thing in common. They don't
alter their views to match the facts.

They alter the facts to match their views.

Doctor Who The Face of Evil, Part 4, January 22, 1977
(Binky couldn't name the episode)

The Doctor wrote on 28/4/22 12:10 am:
> In article <t4beor$tpv$1@dont-email.me>,
> Daniel65 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>> The Other Doctor wrote on 27/4/22 6:15 pm:
>>> "Daniel65" <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote in message
>>> news:t4aqhu$536$1@dont-email.me...
>>>>
>>>> <Snip>
>>>>
>>>>>>> Well Wilson I defend constitutional monarchies! Repbulics
>>>>>>> are failed natios. Does that give you a clue!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No. What's a repbulic? What's a failed natio? Oh yeah. You
>>>>>> can't type. You meant to say "Republics are failed nations."
>>>>>> Which is just another of your lies.
>>>>>
>>>>> Soory why the elites just making the ordinary person suffer ....
>>>>
>>>> "Soory"?? Any half intelligent person, realising that he'd just
>>>> been picked up for his pathetic spelling abilities, might just
>>>> double-check his post *BEFORE* pressing the 'Send' button!!
>>>>
>>>> But not our clown!!
>>>
>>> Wouldn't matter. Even if he got all the words right, his statement
>>> would still make no sense. If he did mange to make it make sense, it
>>> would still be irrelevant. Who's he calling an elite? How are the
>>> elites making the "ordinary person" suffer? What make him think it
>>> happens any more in a republic than it does in a constitutional
>>> monarcy? What is the monarch if not one of the "elite" who are
>>> causing all the alleged suffering?
>>>
>>> Sounds like Yads is really a communist to me...
>>
>> Owwww! You might be on to something there, Stephen.
>>
>> If the clown *IS* a communist ..... a Closet Communist what else might
>> the clown be doing in that closet??
>
> Communist is totalitarian atheism!
>
> It must be eliminated like Naziism!

..... and, of course, we all know that 'Nazism' has been eliminated,
don't we??

Oh! And by the way, clown .... (AKJV) Luke 6:42 Either how canst thou
say to thy brother, Brother, let me pull out the mote that is in thine
eye, when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then
shalt thou see clearly to pull out the mote that is in thy brother’s eye.
--
Daniel

Idlehands wrote on 28/4/22 11:21 am:
> On 2022-04-27 7:55 a.m., The Doctor wrote:
>> In article <t4au0j$sgn$1@dont-email.me>, The Other Doctor
>> <stephen.wilson2004nospam@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>> "Daniel65" <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote in message
>>> news:t4aqhu$536$1@dont-email.me...
>>>>
>>>> <Snip>
>>>>
>>>>>>> Well Wilson I defend constitutional monarchies! Repbulics
>>>>>>> are failed natios. Does that give you a clue!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No. What's a repbulic? What's a failed natio? Oh yeah. You
>>>>>> can't type. You meant to say "Republics are failed
>>>>>> nations." Which is just another of your lies.
>>>>>
>>>>> Soory why the elites just making the ordinary person suffer
>>>>> ....
>>>>
>>>> "Soory"?? Any half intelligent person, realising that he'd just
>>>> been picked up for his pathetic spelling abilities, might just
>>>> double-check his post *BEFORE* pressing the 'Send' button!!
>>>>
>>>> But not our clown!!
>>>
>>> Wouldn't matter. Even if he got all the words right, his
>>> statement would still make no sense. If he did mange to make it
>>> make sense, it would still be irrelevant. Who's he calling an
>>> elite? How are the elites making the "ordinary person" suffer?
>>> What make him think it happens any more in a republic than it
>>> does in a constitutional monarcy? What is the monarch if not one
>>> of the "elite" who are causing all the alleged suffering?
>>>
>>> Sounds like Yads is really a communist to me...
>>
>> I am a constitutional monarchy! You Wilson OTOH, would fit the
>> communist mould quite well.
>
> You really don't understand the words you throw around do you binky?

I think everyone here, including the clown, would be aware of this!!

> Do you think you look intelligent while you do this?

The number of times the clown gets corrected should inform the clown
that he isn't held in high esteem around here!!

> The laughter you can't hear would tell you different.

YEAP!! Yeap! Yeap!
--
Daniel

The Doctor wrote on 27/4/22 11:51 pm:
> In article <t4aqte$536$2@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
> <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 26/04/2022 11:48 pm:
>>> In article <t48o4m$vvs$3@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>> <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor wrote on 26/4/22 7:22 am:
>>>>
>>>> <Snip>
>>>>
>>>>> Ever though Borwn was the first to make mention of this.
>>>>
>>>> "Borwn"?? Who the hell is that, clown??
>>
>>
>>> Do you recall Gordon Brown?
>>
>> Yes, clown, former PM of GB, clown, but I was asking who the
>> 'Borwn" was that you referred to, clown!!

> He started the ball rolling over succession laws, Dannyboy.

No, that was 'Gordon Brown', wasn't it, clown??

Not some guy with the surname 'Borwn' that YOU, clown, referred to, clown!!

Oh! And by the way, clown .... (AKJV) Luke 6:42 Either how canst thou
say to thy brother, Brother, let me pull out the mote that is in thine
eye, when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then
shalt thou see clearly to pull out the mote that is in thy brother’s eye.
--
Daniel

"The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:t4ccs9$2sg8$1@gallifrey.nk.ca...
> In article <t4bk1b$9g0$1@dont-email.me>,
> The Other Doctor <stephen.wilson2004nospam@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>
>>"The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>>news:t4bj3q$1sgm$100@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>>> In article <t4bi41$ors$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> The Other Doctor <stephen.wilson2004nospam@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>"The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>>>>news:t4bi1b$1sgm$65@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>>>>> In article <t4au0j$sgn$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> The Other Doctor <stephen.wilson2004nospam@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"Daniel65" <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote in message
>>>>>>news:t4aqhu$536$1@dont-email.me...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <Snip>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Well Wilson I defend constitutional monarchies! Repbulics are
>>>>>>>>>> failed natios. Does that give you a clue!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> No. What's a repbulic? What's a failed natio? Oh yeah. You can't
>>>>>>>>> type. You meant to say "Republics are failed nations." Which is
>>>>>>>>> just another of your lies.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Soory why the elites just making the ordinary person suffer ....
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Soory"?? Any half intelligent person, realising that he'd just been
>>>>>>> picked up for his pathetic spelling abilities, might just
>>>>>>> double-check
>>>>>>> his
>>>>>>> post *BEFORE* pressing the 'Send' button!!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But not our clown!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Wouldn't matter. Even if he got all the words right, his statement
>>>>>>would
>>>>>>still make no sense. If he did mange to make it make sense, it would
>>>>>>still
>>>>>>be irrelevant. Who's he calling an elite? How are the elites making
>>>>>>the
>>>>>>"ordinary person" suffer? What make him think it happens any more in a
>>>>>>republic than it does in a constitutional monarcy? What is the monarch
>>>>>>if
>>>>>>not one of the "elite" who are causing all the alleged suffering?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Sounds like Yads is really a communist to me...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I am a constitutional monarchy! You Wilson OTOH,
>>>>> would fit the communist mould quite well.
>>>>
>>>>Liar! You are not a monarchy of any kind.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Constitution Monarchy with PArliamentary Democracy
>>> is best form of government given all the other options.
>>
>>Liar. It's called a constitutional monarchy. And you've absolutely no idea
>>why you think it's better than any other option. You don't know or
>>understand what the other options are.
>>
>>
>
> REpublics? Failed andcorrupt nation states!

Liar.

"The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:t4dv4v$2h09$79@gallifrey.nk.ca...
> In article <t4dq4n$3bi$1@dont-email.me>,
> The Other Doctor <stephen.wilson2004nospam@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>
>>"The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>>news:t4ccs9$2sg8$1@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>>> In article <t4bk1b$9g0$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> The Other Doctor <stephen.wilson2004nospam@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>"The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>>>>news:t4bj3q$1sgm$100@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>>>>> In article <t4bi41$ors$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> The Other Doctor <stephen.wilson2004nospam@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>>>>>>news:t4bi1b$1sgm$65@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>>>>>>> In article <t4au0j$sgn$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>> The Other Doctor <stephen.wilson2004nospam@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>"Daniel65" <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>news:t4aqhu$536$1@dont-email.me...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> <Snip>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Well Wilson I defend constitutional monarchies! Repbulics are
>>>>>>>>>>>> failed natios. Does that give you a clue!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> No. What's a repbulic? What's a failed natio? Oh yeah. You can't
>>>>>>>>>>> type. You meant to say "Republics are failed nations." Which is
>>>>>>>>>>> just another of your lies.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Soory why the elites just making the ordinary person suffer ....
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Soory"?? Any half intelligent person, realising that he'd just
>>>>>>>>> been
>>>>>>>>> picked up for his pathetic spelling abilities, might just
>>>>>>>>> double-check
>>>>>>>>> his
>>>>>>>>> post *BEFORE* pressing the 'Send' button!!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> But not our clown!!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Wouldn't matter. Even if he got all the words right, his statement
>>>>>>>>would
>>>>>>>>still make no sense. If he did mange to make it make sense, it would
>>>>>>>>still
>>>>>>>>be irrelevant. Who's he calling an elite? How are the elites making
>>>>>>>>the
>>>>>>>>"ordinary person" suffer? What make him think it happens any more in
>>>>>>>>a
>>>>>>>>republic than it does in a constitutional monarcy? What is the
>>>>>>>>monarch
>>>>>>>>if
>>>>>>>>not one of the "elite" who are causing all the alleged suffering?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Sounds like Yads is really a communist to me...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am a constitutional monarchy! You Wilson OTOH,
>>>>>>> would fit the communist mould quite well.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Liar! You are not a monarchy of any kind.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Constitution Monarchy with PArliamentary Democracy
>>>>> is best form of government given all the other options.
>>>>
>>>>Liar. It's called a constitutional monarchy. And you've absolutely no
>>>>idea
>>>>why you think it's better than any other option. You don't know or
>>>>understand what the other options are.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> REpublics? Failed andcorrupt nation states!
>>
>>Liar.
>>
>>
>
> No lies there! Ever seen a non-conflict-of-interest republic?

Lemon curry.

"The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:t4duvh$2h09$72@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ever though Borwn was the first to make mention of this.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Borwn"?? Who the hell is that, clown??
>>>>
>>>>> Do you recall Gordon Brown?
>>>>
>>>> Yes, clown, former PM of GB, clown, but I was asking who the
>>>> 'Borwn" was that you referred to, clown!!
>>
>>> He started the ball rolling over succession laws, Dannyboy.
>>
>>No, that was 'Gordon Brown', wasn't it, clown??
>>
>>Not some guy with the surname 'Borwn' that YOU, clown, referred to,
>>clown!!
>
>
> But Brown started the process and Cameron
> put the finishing touches.

Make up your mind Yads. First you say it's Borwn. Now you've changed your
mind and it's Brown.

You're a liar, either way. Brown did NOT start the process. There was talk
about it back in 2004 (Lord Dubs), and before that in a 1998 bill sponsored
by Lord Archer (but later withdrawn).

You haven't got a clue what you're gibbering on about, Yads.

"The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:t4eu66$1k1v$1@gallifrey.nk.ca...
> In article <t4e0o0$oc1$1@dont-email.me>,
> The Other Doctor <stephen.wilson2004nospam@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>
>>"The Doctor" <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>>news:t4duvh$2h09$72@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Ever though Borwn was the first to make mention of this.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Borwn"?? Who the hell is that, clown??
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Do you recall Gordon Brown?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, clown, former PM of GB, clown, but I was asking who the
>>>>>> 'Borwn" was that you referred to, clown!!
>>>>
>>>>> He started the ball rolling over succession laws, Dannyboy.
>>>>
>>>>No, that was 'Gordon Brown', wasn't it, clown??
>>>>
>>>>Not some guy with the surname 'Borwn' that YOU, clown, referred to,
>>>>clown!!
>>>
>>>
>>> But Brown started the process and Cameron
>>> put the finishing touches.
>>
>>Make up your mind Yads. First you say it's Borwn. Now you've changed your
>>mind and it's Brown.
>>
>>You're a liar, either way. Brown did NOT start the process. There was talk
>>about it back in 2004 (Lord Dubs), and before that in a 1998 bill
>>sponsored
>>by Lord Archer (but later withdrawn).
>>
>>You haven't got a clue what you're gibbering on about, Yads.
>>
>>
>
> Typical media for you SW!

Typical idiot for you, DY!

The Doctor wrote on 28/4/22 9:47 pm:
> In article <t4dphg$udm$1@dont-email.me>,
> Daniel65 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>> Idlehands wrote on 28/4/22 11:21 am:

<Snip>

>>> Do you think you look intelligent while you do this?
>>
>> The number of times the clown gets corrected should inform the clown
>> that he isn't held in high esteem around here!!
>>
>>> The laughter you can't hear would tell you different.
>>
>> YEAP!! Yeap! Yeap!
>
> The Constitutional Monarchy with PArliamentary democracy version
> is the best form of government considering the options.
>
> Excuse for for misquoting Churchill!

"Excuse"?? For WHAT, clown??

"for for"??
--
Daniel

The Doctor wrote on 28/4/22 9:49 pm:
> In article <t4dpma$udm$2@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
> <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 27/4/22 11:51 pm:
>>> In article <t4aqte$536$2@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>> <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor wrote on 26/04/2022 11:48 pm:
>>>>> In article <t48o4m$vvs$3@dont-email.me>, Daniel65
>>>>> <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>>>>> The Doctor wrote on 26/4/22 7:22 am:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <Snip>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ever though Borwn was the first to make mention of this.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Borwn"?? Who the hell is that, clown??
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Do you recall Gordon Brown?
>>>>
>>>> Yes, clown, former PM of GB, clown, but I was asking who the
>>>> 'Borwn" was that you referred to, clown!!
>>
>>
>>> He started the ball rolling over succession laws, Dannyboy.
>>
>> No, that was 'Gordon Brown', wasn't it, clown??
>>
>> Not some guy with the surname 'Borwn' that YOU, clown, referred to,
>> clown!!

> But Brown started the process and Cameron put the finishing touches.

Ah!! So are YOU, clown, now calling Cameron 'Borwn", clown??

Oh! And by the way, clown .... (AKJV) Luke 6:42 Either how canst thou
say to thy brother, Brother, let me pull out the mote that is in thine
eye, when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then
shalt thou see clearly to pull out the mote that is in thy brother’s eye.
--
Daniel