Our society doesn�t appreciate commercials � there is a reason so many
people pay extra on streaming services to eliminate them. This may
explain why the movie theater I recently sat in to watch the newly
released �Call Jane� was painfully empty.

As it was the first day it was shown in theaters, I had dutifully
reserved a seat in advance, but my preparation proved pointless. It was
a party of one.

It appears my empty theater experience wasn�t unique either, as early
box office receipts show a worldwide opening weekend total of $258,532
� a failure by every Hollywood standard. �Call Jane� is supposed to
illustrate a pre-Roe illegal abortion network, but American consumers
have apparently identified that it�s just a 121-minute-long commercial
for today�s abortion lobby � and they�re not buying it.

Marketed as a movie meant to normalize abortion according to director
Phyllis Nagy, �Call Jane� (rated R) is the story of a fictional
housewife getting involved with an illegal abortion network. More
importantly, however, it is a direct reflection of the dangerous enemy
we are dealing with in modern expanding illegal abortion networks �
starting with the film�s acceptance of the sexist principle that
mothers can never be successful.

�Call Jane� lead actress Elizabeth Banks, who plays the housewife
�Joy,� may have said it boldest when she told Vanity Fair that �the
only thing that can stand in the way of a woman�[going to college and
having an ambitious career] is irresponsible ejaculation and the
patriarchy.� Her sentiment was echoed throughout the film, most notably
when one character said getting elective abortions was �life or death�
for everyone � is it really that impossible for a woman to take
responsibility and be a parent as well as have a successful career?

Beyond this, other ugly comparisons can be made. For instance, the
illegal abortion network in this film used fake doctors or unschooled
women to commit surgical abortions in a medical nightmare as they
�trained� to do the procedure themselves by gutting pumpkins (as though
surgery is as simple and risk-free as carving a Jack-O-Lantern.)
Today�s new back-alley abortion method unfortunately follows suit �
except this time, it�s through Chemical Abortion pills.

A recent Washington Post article showed how unlicensed abortion
advocates are sending life-ending pills through the mail to vulnerable
women without any real knowledge of their pregnancy. This leads to
intensely dangerous situations for women, including one woman in the
article who took Chemical Abortion pills well past when the Food and
Drug Administration (FDA) deems them safe � only time will tell of her
future medical complications.

�Call Jane� also illustrated the abortion lobby�s overall contempt for
parents, as characters in the abortion network promised to conceal
minors� abortions from their guardian, thoughtless of the implications
� sound familiar? Abortion supporters today rage against including
parents, particularly protesting parental notification laws, despite
the fact that these measures help protect children who have become
pregnant as the result of rape or who have ended up in forced
prostitution, like Dr. Brook Bello did.

Another terrifying reality that abortion-seeking women face is brought
up in the film when illegal abortion network boss Virginia (played by
Sigourney Weaver) tells Joy about her disdain for the disreputable
people who make killing pre-born children their job, saying, �The rads
[the radical abortion lobby] have bigger pigs than the pigs.� Her
statement is well-illustrated by the initial abortionist in the film
named Dean (played by Cory Michael Smith), who was greedy and
disgustingly corrupt enough to make deals that involved women taking
their shirts off as compensation. Today, the abortion industry is
filled with similar perversion.

The examples of this are legion (Kermit Gosnell and Ulrich Klopfer
perhaps being the most famous), but Nevada abortionist Dr. Adam Levy is
a particularly relevant one. He recently appeared in a Democrat-
sponsored campaign ad for the midterm elections as a medical expert �
but he has a frightening history of severely botching abortions (one to
the point of maternal death) and being charged with the sexual assault
of multiple children. If this man is the spokesperson for legal
abortion, who exactly might be hiding in the shadows of illegal
abortion networks?

For the few watching �Call Jane� in the theaters, surrounded by lonely
seats, it is a reminder that it takes a village to both flunk a movie
and win upcoming elections. If Americans are truly concerned about
cracking down on the rising covert Chemical Abortion pill operations in
this country � and if we care anything about women�s health, we will be
� voices need to be raised together through votes at the ballot box for
the protection of life.

--
Let's go Brandon!

> Ubiquitous wrote:
> Our society doesn’t appreciate commercials — there is a reason so
many
> people pay extra on streaming services to eliminate them. This may
> explain why the movie theater I recently sat in to watch the newly
> released “Call Jane” was painfully empty.
>
> As it was the first day it was shown in theaters, I had dutifully
> reserved a seat in advance, but my preparation proved pointless. It
was
> a party of one.
>
> It appears my empty theater experience wasn’t unique either, as
early
> box office receipts show a worldwide opening weekend total of
$258,532
> — a failure by every Hollywood standard. “Call Jane” is supposed to

> illustrate a pre-Roe illegal abortion network, but American
consumers
> have apparently identified that it’s just a 121-minute-long
commercial
> for today’s abortion lobby — and they’re not buying it.
>
> Marketed as a movie meant to normalize abortion according to
director
> Phyllis Nagy, “Call Jane” (rated R) is the story of a fictional
> housewife getting involved with an illegal abortion network. More
> importantly, however, it is a direct reflection of the dangerous
enemy
> we are dealing with in modern expanding illegal abortion networks —

> starting with the film’s acceptance of the sexist principle that
> mothers can never be successful.
>
> “Call Jane” lead actress Elizabeth Banks, who plays the housewife
> “Joy,” may have said it boldest when she told Vanity Fair that “the

> only thing that can stand in the way of a woman…[going to college
and
> having an ambitious career] is irresponsible ejaculation and the
> patriarchy.” Her sentiment was echoed throughout the film, most
notably
> when one character said getting elective abortions was “life or
death”
> for everyone — is it really that impossible for a woman to take
> responsibility and be a parent as well as have a successful career?
>
> Beyond this, other ugly comparisons can be made. For instance, the
> illegal abortion network in this film used fake doctors or
unschooled
> women to commit surgical abortions in a medical nightmare as they
> ‘trained’ to do the procedure themselves by gutting pumpkins (as
though
> surgery is as simple and risk-free as carving a Jack-O-Lantern.)
> Today’s new back-alley abortion method unfortunately follows suit —

> except this time, it’s through Chemical Abortion pills.
>
> A recent Washington Post article showed how unlicensed abortion
> advocates are sending life-ending pills through the mail to
vulnerable
> women without any real knowledge of their pregnancy. This leads to
> intensely dangerous situations for women, including one woman in
the
> article who took Chemical Abortion pills well past when the Food
and
> Drug Administration (FDA) deems them safe — only time will tell of
her
> future medical complications.
>
> “Call Jane” also illustrated the abortion lobby’s overall contempt
for
> parents, as characters in the abortion network promised to conceal
> minors’ abortions from their guardian, thoughtless of the
implications
> — sound familiar? Abortion supporters today rage against including
> parents, particularly protesting parental notification laws,
despite
> the fact that these measures help protect children who have become
> pregnant as the result of rape or who have ended up in forced
> prostitution, like Dr. Brook Bello did.
>
> Another terrifying reality that abortion-seeking women face is
brought
> up in the film when illegal abortion network boss Virginia (played
by
> Sigourney Weaver) tells Joy about her disdain for the disreputable
> people who make killing pre-born children their job, saying, “The
rads
> [the radical abortion lobby] have bigger pigs than the pigs.” Her
> statement is well-illustrated by the initial abortionist in the
film
> named Dean (played by Cory Michael Smith), who was greedy and
> disgustingly corrupt enough to make deals that involved women
taking
> their shirts off as compensation. Today, the abortion industry is
> filled with similar perversion.
>
> The examples of this are legion (Kermit Gosnell and Ulrich Klopfer
> perhaps being the most famous), but Nevada abortionist Dr. Adam
Levy is
> a particularly relevant one. He recently appeared in a Democrat-
> sponsored campaign ad for the midterm elections as a medical expert
—
> but he has a frightening history of severely botching abortions
(one to
> the point of maternal death) and being charged with the sexual
assault
> of multiple children. If this man is the spokesperson for legal
> abortion, who exactly might be hiding in the shadows of illegal
> abortion networks?
>
> For the few watching “Call Jane” in the theaters, surrounded by
lonely
> seats, it is a reminder that it takes a village to both flunk a
movie
> and win upcoming elections. If Americans are truly concerned about
> cracking down on the rising covert Chemical Abortion pill
operations in
> this country — and if we care anything about women’s health, we
will be
> — voices need to be raised together through votes at the ballot box
for
> the protection of life.
>
> --
> Let's go Brandon!

"Out of sight, Out of mind".

Personally this one I do not care.

It is normal for a man to dominate a woman in the name of peace with
his neighbor. What did a room of women ever did for anybody?

This is a response to the post seen at:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=635812210#635812210