The Doctor wrote on 17/5/22 1:21 am:
> In article <2cbe5239-f3ea-4717-9e06-2882fbd4cad7n@googlegroups.com>,
> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbrueni@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Monday, September 28, 2015 at 1:03:05 PM UTC-7,
>> netk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> In article <2a184f4f-c027-4503...@googlegroups.com>, TB
>>> <tsbr...@dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote:
>>>> On Monday, September 28, 2015 at 9:38:24 AM UTC-7, Stephen
>>>> Wilson wrote:
>>>>> "The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>>>>> news:mu9udl$e0j$1...@ns2.nl2k.ab.ca...
>>>>>> In article <9tadne8iu8HD5JXL...@eclipse.net.uk>, Agamemnon
>>>>>> <agam...@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 27/09/2015 00:46, Rob wrote:

<Snip>

>>>>>>>> I enjoyed episode 2 but mainly for the many references
>>>>>>>> to Old Who including the HADS system.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Good fun but not as powerful as Genesis.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> True.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> HADS works every time.
>>>>>
>>>>> No, it works very infrequently.
>>>>
>>>> Why didn't the HADS function when the Daleks were dipping the
>>>> TARDIS in lava (Journey's End)?
>>> Maybe it did.
>>
>> If the HADS was functioning, then why didn't the TARDIS
>> dematerialize until the newly created Meta Crisis/Hand Doctor had
>> gotten up off the floor and manipulated the controls?
>
> 6.5 years later.

And, given all that time, clown, YOU, clown, still can't provide a
decent answer to Tim's question, clown!!

So nothing worthwhile to contribute .... but *HAD* to contribute,
none-the-less!! But, still, it's a post so added to your Precious Post
Count, clown!!

Oh! And by the way, clown .... (AKJV) Luke 6:42 Either how canst thou
say to thy brother, Brother, let me pull out the mote that is in thine
eye, when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then
shalt thou see clearly to pull out the mote that is in thy brother’s eye.
--
Daniel