The Doctor wrote on 17/5/22 1:20 am:
> In article <f377ff13-c0fa-4c13-8dc2-0a82e65247f8n@googlegroups.com>,
> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbrueni@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tuesday, August 28, 2018 at 6:35:50 AM UTC-7, Daniel60 wrote:
>>> Timothy Bruening wrote on 28/08/2018 4:15 PM:
>>>> On Tuesday, July 10, 2018 at 8:04:51 AM UTC-7, The Doctor
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> In article <191d9340-4dd2-44fe...@googlegroups.com>, Tim
>>>>> Bruening <tsbr...@dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote:
>>>>>> On Saturday, March 31, 2018 at 12:14:15 AM UTC-7, Daniel60
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> The Other Doctor wrote on 31/03/18 04:07:
>>>>>>>> "Timothy Bruening" <tsbr...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:bde90718-5e87-42c9...@googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Wouldn't all writers be told about the features of the
>>>>>>>>> TARDIS as a matter of course?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No. For 3 reasons:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 1. There is no document that describes all of the
>>>>>>>> features of the TARDIS
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2. As a result, the features of the TARDIS have never
>>>>>>>> remained particularly consistent
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 3. If you gave a technical essay to each writer before
>>>>>>>> they even wrote a story, you'd end up with no writers.
>>>>>>>> All they really need to know is that the TARDIS is a
>>>>>>>> box that travels through time and space.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Fair enough. But wouldn't it be possible for the
>>>>>>> Executive Producer, or some such, to have a complete
>>>>>>> listing of all known facts to check each script
>>>>>>> against??
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> e.g. The Doctor was on Earth during the following years
>>>>>>> ........... The TARDIS has the follow capabilities
>>>>>>> ................ Davros has done the following
>>>>>>> ............. The Daleks have done the following
>>>>>>> ............... The Daleks have appeared during Earth
>>>>>>> years ............ The Daleks have the following
>>>>>>> weaknesses .......... The Cybermen appeared on Earth in
>>>>>>> the following years ........ The Cybermen have the
>>>>>>> following weaknesses ............
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> etc, etc, etc.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I second the motion!
>>>>>
>>>>> I see no motion on the table.
>>>>
>>>> I was endorsing the proposal that the Executive Producer have a
>>>> complete list of facts to check scripts against!
>>>>
>>> So, perhaps, someone should move that motion first, Tim. Then
>>> you could second it!!
>>
>> It looked to me like The Other Doctor was making a motion that
>> there should be a set of known facts to check scripts against.
>
> Still fails!

Consistency, clown, WE want consistency!!

Here, Tim has resurrected a thread from August 2018 and YOU, clown, just
respond to his post ..... without bitching about the thread being
soooooo old, clown!!

Consistency, clown, WE want consistency!!

Of course, it could also be consistant of YOU, clown, if YOU, clown,
stopped bitching about Tim resurrecting these old posts and just posted
answers to the questions Tim asks!!

Consistency, clown, WE want consistency!!

Oh! And by the way, clown .... (AKJV) Luke 6:42 Either how canst thou
say to thy brother, Brother, let me pull out the mote that is in thine
eye, when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then
shalt thou see clearly to pull out the mote that is in thy brother’s eye.
--
Daniel

The Doctor wrote on 18/05/2022 12:10 am:
> In article <t5vr5c$dc4$1@dont-email.me>,
> Daniel65 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 17/5/22 1:20 am:
>>> In article <f377ff13-c0fa-4c13-8dc2-0a82e65247f8n@googlegroups.com>,
>>> tsbr...@gmail.com <tsbrueni@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Tuesday, August 28, 2018 at 6:35:50 AM UTC-7, Daniel60 wrote:
>>>>> Timothy Bruening wrote on 28/08/2018 4:15 PM:

<Snip>

>>>>>> I was endorsing the proposal that the Executive Producer have a
>>>>>> complete list of facts to check scripts against!
>>>>>>
>>>>> So, perhaps, someone should move that motion first, Tim. Then
>>>>> you could second it!!
>>>>
>>>> It looked to me like The Other Doctor was making a motion that
>>>> there should be a set of known facts to check scripts against.
>>>
>>> Still fails!
>>
>> Consistency, clown, WE want consistency!!
>>
>> Here, Tim has resurrected a thread from August 2018 and YOU, clown, just
>> respond to his post ..... without bitching about the thread being
>> soooooo old, clown!!
>>
>> Consistency, clown, WE want consistency!!
>>
>> Of course, it could also be consistant of YOU, clown, if YOU, clown,
>> stopped bitching about Tim resurrecting these old posts and just posted
>> answers to the questions Tim asks!!
>>
>> Consistency, clown, WE want consistency!!

> I try my best.

PATHETIC!!

Oh! And by the way, clown .... (AKJV) Luke 6:42 Either how canst thou
say to thy brother, Brother, let me pull out the mote that is in thine
eye, when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then
shalt thou see clearly to pull out the mote that is in thy brother’s eye.
--
Daniel