Dilbert: How To Kill Your Boss
https://dilbert.com/strip/2023-01-17

I have heard this rumor, I wonder if it is truly a fact.

Lynn

In article <tq6ucc$3c6cv$2@dont-email.me>,
Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> wrote:
>Dilbert: How To Kill Your Boss
> https://dilbert.com/strip/2023-01-17
>
>I have heard this rumor, I wonder if it is truly a fact.
>
>Lynn

Well, you have to think historically that there have been a number of
murders using the setups from murder mysteries, but without the critical
mistake that let the detective solve it..

--
columbiaclosings.com
What's not in Columbia anymore..

Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> wrote in news:tq6ucc$3c6cv$2
@dont-email.me:

> Dilbert: How To Kill Your Boss
> https://dilbert.com/strip/2023-01-17
>
> I have heard this rumor, I wonder if it is truly a fact.
>
I haven't played with ChatGPT much, but in my experience, no, it
won't work that way. Instead, it will lecture you on how violence is
never the answer, and imply you need psychiatric treatment. (And
that's asking question in a specifically gaming context).

--
Terry Austin

"Terry Austin: like the polio vaccine, only with more asshole."
-- David Bilek

Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.

On 2023-01-17 19:53:46 +0000, Lynn McGuire said:
>
> Dilbert: How To Kill Your Boss
> https://dilbert.com/strip/2023-01-17
>
> I have heard this rumor, I wonder if it is truly a fact.
>
> Lynn

It's a bigger problem if you're self-employed. ;-)

On 1/17/2023 4:08 PM, Your Name wrote:
> On 2023-01-17 19:53:46 +0000, Lynn McGuire said:
>>
>> Dilbert: How To Kill Your Boss
>>     https://dilbert.com/strip/2023-01-17
>>
>> I have heard this rumor, I wonder if it is truly a fact.
>>
>> Lynn
>
> It's a bigger problem if you're self-employed.  ;-)

+1

Lynn

Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote in news:tq769k$f9$1
@gioia.aioe.org:

> On 2023-01-17 19:53:46 +0000, Lynn McGuire said:
>>
>> Dilbert: How To Kill Your Boss
>> https://dilbert.com/strip/2023-01-17
>>
>> I have heard this rumor, I wonder if it is truly a fact.
>>
>> Lynn
>
> It's a bigger problem if you're self-employed. ;-)
>
I dunno. If you're self employed, and asking questions like that,
seems to be to be much less of a problem.

--
Terry Austin

"Terry Austin: like the polio vaccine, only with more asshole."
-- David Bilek

Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.

On 1/17/2023 2:31 PM, Lynn McGuire wrote:
> On 1/17/2023 4:08 PM, Your Name wrote:
>> On 2023-01-17 19:53:46 +0000, Lynn McGuire said:
>>>
>>> Dilbert: How To Kill Your Boss
>>>     https://dilbert.com/strip/2023-01-17
>>>
>>> I have heard this rumor, I wonder if it is truly a fact.
>>>
>>> Lynn
>>
>> It's a bigger problem if you're self-employed.  ;-)
>
> +1
>
But MUCH easier to pull off.

--
I've done good in this world. Now I'm tired and just want to be a cranky
dirty old man.

On Tuesday, 17 January 2023 at 19:53:52 UTC, Lynn McGuire wrote:
> Dilbert: How To Kill Your Boss
> https://dilbert.com/strip/2023-01-17
>
> I have heard this rumor, I wonder if it is truly a fact.

I don't know if ChatGPT has ethics. Someone said
on BBC that it has no actual knowledge, it just puts
together words in a pleasing arrangement. And so it
tells you what you want to here.

Leaving that aside, a lot of this is in "A Logic Named Joe".
But, again, with no ethical filter.

Robert Carnegie <rja.carnegie@excite.com> writes:
>On Tuesday, 17 January 2023 at 19:53:52 UTC, Lynn McGuire wrote:
>> Dilbert: How To Kill Your Boss
>> https://dilbert.com/strip/2023-01-17
>>
>> I have heard this rumor, I wonder if it is truly a fact.
>
>I don't know if ChatGPT has ethics. Someone said
>on BBC that it has no actual knowledge, it just puts
>together words in a pleasing arrangement. And so it
>tells you what you want to here.
>
>Leaving that aside, a lot of this is in "A Logic Named Joe".
>But, again, with no ethical filter.

Just a newer version of

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ELIZA

On 1/18/2023 3:42 PM, Scott Lurndal wrote:
> Robert Carnegie <rja.carnegie@excite.com> writes:
>> On Tuesday, 17 January 2023 at 19:53:52 UTC, Lynn McGuire wrote:
>>> Dilbert: How To Kill Your Boss
>>> https://dilbert.com/strip/2023-01-17
>>>
>>> I have heard this rumor, I wonder if it is truly a fact.
>>
>> I don't know if ChatGPT has ethics. Someone said
>> on BBC that it has no actual knowledge, it just puts
>> together words in a pleasing arrangement. And so it
>> tells you what you want to here.
>>
>> Leaving that aside, a lot of this is in "A Logic Named Joe".
>> But, again, with no ethical filter.
>
> Just a newer version of
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ELIZA

I thought that also but could not remember the name.

Thanks,
Lynn

Robert Carnegie <rja.carnegie@excite.com> wrote in news:2c9f9af9-
8c19-4e83-844d-7a2dd61d4b2en@googlegroups.com:

> On Tuesday, 17 January 2023 at 19:53:52 UTC, Lynn McGuire wrote:
>> Dilbert: How To Kill Your Boss
>> https://dilbert.com/strip/2023-01-17
>>
>> I have heard this rumor, I wonder if it is truly a fact.
>
> I don't know if ChatGPT has ethics. Someone said
> on BBC that it has no actual knowledge, it just puts
> together words in a pleasing arrangement. And so it
> tells you what you want to here.

From my playing around, it appears to identify the central theme of
your request - fairly reliably - and then regurgitates a handful of
generic facts about it. Nothing obscure, nothing deep, certainly
nothing new or original. All regurgitation.

--
Terry Austin

"Terry Austin: like the polio vaccine, only with more asshole."
-- David Bilek

Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.

scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) wrote in news:yJZxL.92050
$mmyc.74346@fx37.iad:

> Robert Carnegie <rja.carnegie@excite.com> writes:
>>On Tuesday, 17 January 2023 at 19:53:52 UTC, Lynn McGuire wrote:
>>> Dilbert: How To Kill Your Boss
>>> https://dilbert.com/strip/2023-01-17
>>>
>>> I have heard this rumor, I wonder if it is truly a fact.
>>
>>I don't know if ChatGPT has ethics. Someone said
>>on BBC that it has no actual knowledge, it just puts
>>together words in a pleasing arrangement. And so it
>>tells you what you want to here.
>>
>>Leaving that aside, a lot of this is in "A Logic Named Joe".
>>But, again, with no ethical filter.
>
> Just a newer version of
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ELIZA

A bit more sophisticated, and a bit less random. No smarter, though.

--
Terry Austin

"Terry Austin: like the polio vaccine, only with more asshole."
-- David Bilek

Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.

On Wed, 18 Jan 2023 16:36:04 -0700, Jibini Kula Tumbili Kujisalimisha
<taustinca@gmail.com> wrote:

>Robert Carnegie <rja.carnegie@excite.com> wrote in news:2c9f9af9-
>8c19-4e83-844d-7a2dd61d4b2en@googlegroups.com:
>
>> On Tuesday, 17 January 2023 at 19:53:52 UTC, Lynn McGuire wrote:
>>> Dilbert: How To Kill Your Boss
>>> https://dilbert.com/strip/2023-01-17
>>>
>>> I have heard this rumor, I wonder if it is truly a fact.
>>
>> I don't know if ChatGPT has ethics. Someone said
>> on BBC that it has no actual knowledge, it just puts
>> together words in a pleasing arrangement. And so it
>> tells you what you want to here.
>
>From my playing around, it appears to identify the central theme of
>your request - fairly reliably - and then regurgitates a handful of
>generic facts about it. Nothing obscure, nothing deep, certainly
>nothing new or original. All regurgitation.

Sounds perfect for written text homework, then.

For what is written text homework but ... regurgitation?

Or essay questions on tests, for that matter?
--
"In this connexion, unquestionably the most significant
development was the disintegration, under Christian
influence, of classical conceptions of the family and
of family right."

Paul S Person <psperson@old.netcom.invalid> wrote in
news:d7vishplu43b492qk4kenfmc5drnqj9dfp@4ax.com:

> On Wed, 18 Jan 2023 16:36:04 -0700, Jibini Kula Tumbili
> Kujisalimisha <taustinca@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Robert Carnegie <rja.carnegie@excite.com> wrote in
>>news:2c9f9af9- 8c19-4e83-844d-7a2dd61d4b2en@googlegroups.com:
>>
>>> On Tuesday, 17 January 2023 at 19:53:52 UTC, Lynn McGuire
>>> wrote:
>>>> Dilbert: How To Kill Your Boss
>>>> https://dilbert.com/strip/2023-01-17
>>>>
>>>> I have heard this rumor, I wonder if it is truly a fact.
>>>
>>> I don't know if ChatGPT has ethics. Someone said
>>> on BBC that it has no actual knowledge, it just puts
>>> together words in a pleasing arrangement. And so it
>>> tells you what you want to here.
>>
>>From my playing around, it appears to identify the central theme
>>of your request - fairly reliably - and then regurgitates a
>>handful of generic facts about it. Nothing obscure, nothing
>>deep, certainly nothing new or original. All regurgitation.
>
> Sounds perfect for written text homework, then.
>
> For what is written text homework but ... regurgitation?
>
> Or essay questions on tests, for that matter?

It's being used increasingly for just that, especially at the
college level.

Also, it is apparently also suitable for writing papers for peer
reviewed journals.

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-00107-z

--
Terry Austin

"Terry Austin: like the polio vaccine, only with more asshole."
-- David Bilek

Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.

In article <XnsAF916B8B58B29taustingmail@85.12.62.245>,
Jibini Kula Tumbili Kujisalimisha <taustinca@gmail.com> wrote:
>Paul S Person <psperson@old.netcom.invalid> wrote in
>news:d7vishplu43b492qk4kenfmc5drnqj9dfp@4ax.com:
>
>> On Wed, 18 Jan 2023 16:36:04 -0700, Jibini Kula Tumbili
>> Kujisalimisha <taustinca@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Robert Carnegie <rja.carnegie@excite.com> wrote in
>>>news:2c9f9af9- 8c19-4e83-844d-7a2dd61d4b2en@googlegroups.com:
>>>
>>>> On Tuesday, 17 January 2023 at 19:53:52 UTC, Lynn McGuire
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Dilbert: How To Kill Your Boss
>>>>> https://dilbert.com/strip/2023-01-17
>>>>>
>>>>> I have heard this rumor, I wonder if it is truly a fact.
>>>>
>>>> I don't know if ChatGPT has ethics. Someone said
>>>> on BBC that it has no actual knowledge, it just puts
>>>> together words in a pleasing arrangement. And so it
>>>> tells you what you want to here.
>>>
>>>From my playing around, it appears to identify the central theme
>>>of your request - fairly reliably - and then regurgitates a
>>>handful of generic facts about it. Nothing obscure, nothing
>>>deep, certainly nothing new or original. All regurgitation.
>>
>> Sounds perfect for written text homework, then.
>>
>> For what is written text homework but ... regurgitation?
>>
>> Or essay questions on tests, for that matter?
>
>It's being used increasingly for just that, especially at the
>college level.
>
>Also, it is apparently also suitable for writing papers for peer
>reviewed journals.
>
>https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-00107-z
>

Once it can write the peer reviews as well, the circle will be complete..

Shades of "Galley Slave" somehow.
--
columbiaclosings.com
What's not in Columbia anymore..

ted@loft.tnolan.com (Ted Nolan <tednolan>) wrote in
news:k2thrnF6j87U1@mid.individual.net:

> In article <XnsAF916B8B58B29taustingmail@85.12.62.245>,
> Jibini Kula Tumbili Kujisalimisha <taustinca@gmail.com> wrote:
>>Paul S Person <psperson@old.netcom.invalid> wrote in
>>news:d7vishplu43b492qk4kenfmc5drnqj9dfp@4ax.com:
>>
>>> On Wed, 18 Jan 2023 16:36:04 -0700, Jibini Kula Tumbili
>>> Kujisalimisha <taustinca@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Robert Carnegie <rja.carnegie@excite.com> wrote in
>>>>news:2c9f9af9- 8c19-4e83-844d-7a2dd61d4b2en@googlegroups.com:
>>>>
>>>>> On Tuesday, 17 January 2023 at 19:53:52 UTC, Lynn McGuire
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Dilbert: How To Kill Your Boss
>>>>>> https://dilbert.com/strip/2023-01-17
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have heard this rumor, I wonder if it is truly a fact.
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't know if ChatGPT has ethics. Someone said
>>>>> on BBC that it has no actual knowledge, it just puts
>>>>> together words in a pleasing arrangement. And so it
>>>>> tells you what you want to here.
>>>>
>>>>From my playing around, it appears to identify the central
>>>>theme of your request - fairly reliably - and then
>>>>regurgitates a handful of generic facts about it. Nothing
>>>>obscure, nothing deep, certainly nothing new or original. All
>>>>regurgitation.
>>>
>>> Sounds perfect for written text homework, then.
>>>
>>> For what is written text homework but ... regurgitation?
>>>
>>> Or essay questions on tests, for that matter?
>>
>>It's being used increasingly for just that, especially at the
>>college level.
>>
>>Also, it is apparently also suitable for writing papers for peer
>>reviewed journals.
>>
>>https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-00107-z
>>
>
> Once it can write the peer reviews as well, the circle will be
> complete..
>
Can't be any worse than the current shit show that is peer reviewed
journals.

--
Terry Austin

"Terry Austin: like the polio vaccine, only with more asshole."
-- David Bilek

Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.

On Thursday, 19 January 2023 at 00:36:09 UTC, Jibini Kula Tumbili Kujisalimisha wrote:
> Robert Carnegie <rja.ca...@excite.com> wrote in news:2c9f9af9-
> 8c19-4e83-844d...@googlegroups.com:
> > On Tuesday, 17 January 2023 at 19:53:52 UTC, Lynn McGuire wrote:
> >> Dilbert: How To Kill Your Boss
> >> https://dilbert.com/strip/2023-01-17
> >>
> >> I have heard this rumor, I wonder if it is truly a fact.
> >
> > I don't know if ChatGPT has ethics. Someone said
> > on BBC that it has no actual knowledge, it just puts
> > together words in a pleasing arrangement. And so it
> > tells you what you want to here.

"hear", dammit.

> From my playing around, it appears to identify the central theme of
> your request - fairly reliably - and then regurgitates a handful of
> generic facts about it. Nothing obscure, nothing deep, certainly
> nothing new or original. All regurgitation.

I suspect it won't reliably identify actual facts.
Make that "texts", perhaps.

I've been seeing web pages for years whose source
appears to be this sort of thing, and it's annoying when
what you want is a thoughtful informative article
written by a human being.

There's also a concern of copyright of text that gets
scooped up into this process and spat out.

Robert Carnegie <rja.carnegie@excite.com> wrote in
news:e91508d6-db31-4fdf-aaf8-ce86e766eaf3n@googlegroups.com:

> On Thursday, 19 January 2023 at 00:36:09 UTC, Jibini Kula
> Tumbili Kujisalimisha wrote:
>> Robert Carnegie <rja.ca...@excite.com> wrote in news:2c9f9af9-
>> 8c19-4e83-844d...@googlegroups.com:
>> > On Tuesday, 17 January 2023 at 19:53:52 UTC, Lynn McGuire
>> > wrote:
>> >> Dilbert: How To Kill Your Boss
>> >> https://dilbert.com/strip/2023-01-17
>> >>
>> >> I have heard this rumor, I wonder if it is truly a fact.
>> >
>> > I don't know if ChatGPT has ethics. Someone said
>> > on BBC that it has no actual knowledge, it just puts
>> > together words in a pleasing arrangement. And so it
>> > tells you what you want to here.
>
> "hear", dammit.
>
>> From my playing around, it appears to identify the central
>> theme of your request - fairly reliably - and then regurgitates
>> a handful of generic facts about it. Nothing obscure, nothing
>> deep, certainly nothing new or original. All regurgitation.
>
> I suspect it won't reliably identify actual facts.
> Make that "texts", perhaps.

Good point. There have been comments from people using it to write
articles to the effect that they have to edit it a fair amount to
remove errors. Which sounds like more work than actually writing the
article.

--
Terry Austin

"Terry Austin: like the polio vaccine, only with more asshole."
-- David Bilek

Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.

On Thu, 19 Jan 2023 10:34:19 -0700, Jibini Kula Tumbili Kujisalimisha
<taustinca@gmail.com> wrote:

>Paul S Person <psperson@old.netcom.invalid> wrote in
>news:d7vishplu43b492qk4kenfmc5drnqj9dfp@4ax.com:
>
>> On Wed, 18 Jan 2023 16:36:04 -0700, Jibini Kula Tumbili
>> Kujisalimisha <taustinca@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Robert Carnegie <rja.carnegie@excite.com> wrote in
>>>news:2c9f9af9- 8c19-4e83-844d-7a2dd61d4b2en@googlegroups.com:
>>>
>>>> On Tuesday, 17 January 2023 at 19:53:52 UTC, Lynn McGuire
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Dilbert: How To Kill Your Boss
>>>>> https://dilbert.com/strip/2023-01-17
>>>>>
>>>>> I have heard this rumor, I wonder if it is truly a fact.
>>>>
>>>> I don't know if ChatGPT has ethics. Someone said
>>>> on BBC that it has no actual knowledge, it just puts
>>>> together words in a pleasing arrangement. And so it
>>>> tells you what you want to here.
>>>
>>>From my playing around, it appears to identify the central theme
>>>of your request - fairly reliably - and then regurgitates a
>>>handful of generic facts about it. Nothing obscure, nothing
>>>deep, certainly nothing new or original. All regurgitation.
>>
>> Sounds perfect for written text homework, then.
>>
>> For what is written text homework but ... regurgitation?
>>
>> Or essay questions on tests, for that matter?
>
>It's being used increasingly for just that, especially at the
>college level.

IIRC, I saw (but didn't read) an article suggesting that some schools
are going back to pen-and-paper tests to avoid the problem.

One wonders when they will reach the "goose quills and liquid ink"
stage ...

>Also, it is apparently also suitable for writing papers for peer
>reviewed journals.
>
>https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-00107-z

Depending on the subject, that is probably no surprise.
--
"In this connexion, unquestionably the most significant
development was the disintegration, under Christian
influence, of classical conceptions of the family and
of family right."

Paul S Person <psperson@old.netcom.invalid> wrote in
news:5tjlsh1sfrbv125hbf0k1n6qpnm460os2j@4ax.com:

> On Thu, 19 Jan 2023 10:34:19 -0700, Jibini Kula Tumbili
> Kujisalimisha <taustinca@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Paul S Person <psperson@old.netcom.invalid> wrote in
>>news:d7vishplu43b492qk4kenfmc5drnqj9dfp@4ax.com:
>>
>>> On Wed, 18 Jan 2023 16:36:04 -0700, Jibini Kula Tumbili
>>> Kujisalimisha <taustinca@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Robert Carnegie <rja.carnegie@excite.com> wrote in
>>>>news:2c9f9af9- 8c19-4e83-844d-7a2dd61d4b2en@googlegroups.com:
>>>>
>>>>> On Tuesday, 17 January 2023 at 19:53:52 UTC, Lynn McGuire
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Dilbert: How To Kill Your Boss
>>>>>> https://dilbert.com/strip/2023-01-17
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have heard this rumor, I wonder if it is truly a fact.
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't know if ChatGPT has ethics. Someone said
>>>>> on BBC that it has no actual knowledge, it just puts
>>>>> together words in a pleasing arrangement. And so it
>>>>> tells you what you want to here.
>>>>
>>>>From my playing around, it appears to identify the central
>>>>theme of your request - fairly reliably - and then
>>>>regurgitates a handful of generic facts about it. Nothing
>>>>obscure, nothing deep, certainly nothing new or original. All
>>>>regurgitation.
>>>
>>> Sounds perfect for written text homework, then.
>>>
>>> For what is written text homework but ... regurgitation?
>>>
>>> Or essay questions on tests, for that matter?
>>
>>It's being used increasingly for just that, especially at the
>>college level.
>
> IIRC, I saw (but didn't read) an article suggesting that some
> schools are going back to pen-and-paper tests to avoid the
> problem.
>
> One wonders when they will reach the "goose quills and liquid
> ink" stage ...

At which point, somebody will start selling goose quills with WiFi
built in.
>
>>Also, it is apparently also suitable for writing papers for peer
>>reviewed journals.
>>
>>https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-00107-z
>
> Depending on the subject, that is probably no surprise.

Given the sorry state of peer reviewed journals the last few
decades, having an AI write papers might actually improve the
quality.

--
Terry Austin

"Terry Austin: like the polio vaccine, only with more asshole."
-- David Bilek

Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.

On Fri, 20 Jan 2023 11:05:02 -0700, Jibini Kula Tumbili Kujisalimisha
<taustinca@gmail.com> wrote:

>Paul S Person <psperson@old.netcom.invalid> wrote in
>news:5tjlsh1sfrbv125hbf0k1n6qpnm460os2j@4ax.com:
>
>> On Thu, 19 Jan 2023 10:34:19 -0700, Jibini Kula Tumbili
>> Kujisalimisha <taustinca@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Paul S Person <psperson@old.netcom.invalid> wrote in
>>>news:d7vishplu43b492qk4kenfmc5drnqj9dfp@4ax.com:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 18 Jan 2023 16:36:04 -0700, Jibini Kula Tumbili
>>>> Kujisalimisha <taustinca@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Robert Carnegie <rja.carnegie@excite.com> wrote in
>>>>>news:2c9f9af9- 8c19-4e83-844d-7a2dd61d4b2en@googlegroups.com:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tuesday, 17 January 2023 at 19:53:52 UTC, Lynn McGuire
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> Dilbert: How To Kill Your Boss
>>>>>>> https://dilbert.com/strip/2023-01-17
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have heard this rumor, I wonder if it is truly a fact.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't know if ChatGPT has ethics. Someone said
>>>>>> on BBC that it has no actual knowledge, it just puts
>>>>>> together words in a pleasing arrangement. And so it
>>>>>> tells you what you want to here.
>>>>>
>>>>>From my playing around, it appears to identify the central
>>>>>theme of your request - fairly reliably - and then
>>>>>regurgitates a handful of generic facts about it. Nothing
>>>>>obscure, nothing deep, certainly nothing new or original. All
>>>>>regurgitation.
>>>>
>>>> Sounds perfect for written text homework, then.
>>>>
>>>> For what is written text homework but ... regurgitation?
>>>>
>>>> Or essay questions on tests, for that matter?
>>>
>>>It's being used increasingly for just that, especially at the
>>>college level.
>>
>> IIRC, I saw (but didn't read) an article suggesting that some
>> schools are going back to pen-and-paper tests to avoid the
>> problem.
>>
>> One wonders when they will reach the "goose quills and liquid
>> ink" stage ...
>
>At which point, somebody will start selling goose quills with WiFi
>built in.

And then each test-taker will be required to /pull a quill from a live
goose/ on the way in.

And the geese will be raised by the faculty.

OTOH, perhaps a simple Faraday cage
([https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faraday_cage]) would do.

With appropriate /physical/ security, and frequent scanning inside for
WiFi, of course.

Note that the WiFi scanned for can include WiFi generated outside the
cage by the people doing the scanning.

I suspect that a full-blown SCIF would be overkill, but, if that's
what it takes ...
>>>Also, it is apparently also suitable for writing papers for peer
>>>reviewed journals.
>>>
>>>https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-00107-z
>>
>> Depending on the subject, that is probably no surprise.
>
>Given the sorry state of peer reviewed journals the last few
>decades, having an AI write papers might actually improve the
>quality.
--
"In this connexion, unquestionably the most significant
development was the disintegration, under Christian
influence, of classical conceptions of the family and
of family right."