On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 3:37:20 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> Spam-I-Am wrote:
>
> > On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 2:05:43 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> >> On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 1:46:01 PM UTC-4, Spam-I-Am wrote:
> >> > On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 1:42:55 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> >> > > On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 1:25:28 PM UTC-4, Spam-I-Am wrote:
> >> > > > On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 1:19:41 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> >> > > > > On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 12:55:30 PM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> >> > > > > > On 2022-09-28 3:24 p.m., Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:
> >> > > > > > > On Wednesday, September 28, 2022 at 3:10:12 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> >> > > > > > >> On Wednesday, September 28, 2022 at 3:04:38 PM UTC-4,
> >> > > > > > blackpo...@aol.com wrote:
> >> > > > > > >>> On Wednesday, September 28, 2022 at 2:53:20 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery
> >> > > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > > >>>> On Tuesday, September 20, 2022 at 3:34:33 PM UTC-4,
> >> > > > > > george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> >> > > > > > >>>>> On 2022-09-15 9:57 p.m., Edward Rochester Esq. wrote:
> >> > > > > > >>>>>> On Thursday, September 15, 2022 at 8:41:40 PM UTC-4,
> >> > > > > > george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> "Chimp Obsesso" - Jim Senetto's Dockery Obsession Index, Sep.
> >> > > > > > 14, 2022
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> It should be obvious to anyone reading the list that there has
> >> > > > > > been a
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> sharp increase in Jim Senetto's this past week. However,
> >> > > > > > "obvious" isn't
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> always good enough. Accordingly, when asked for statistical
> >> > > > > > evidence, I
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> decided to see what I could come up with.
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> Methodology - I decided to limit myself to the subject's OPs, to
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> eliminate replies to others' posts that mentioned Will, or that
> >> > > > > > simply
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> quoted mentions of Will, neither of which is credible evidence of
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> obsession. Using the Google feed,
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> For the previous 7 days (Sept. 7-13) I added up the number of
> >> > > > > > OPs made
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> by the subject, and the number that mentioned Will, for the
> >> > > > > > 7-day period
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> Sept. 7-13 and used the latter as a percentage of the former to
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> calculate the subject's Dockery Obsession Index. I then used the
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> previous 8 days (Aug. 30-Sep. 6), adding an extra day to make
> >> > > > > > up for
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> Labor Day (when the subject did not post any OPs).
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> Results - For the control period, the subject made 18 OPs, 10
> >> > > > > > of which
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> mentioned or alluded to Will Dockery, for a Dockery Obsession
> >> > > > > > Index of
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> 55.56%. In contrast, over the following 7 days saw the
> >> > > > > > subject's OPs
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> nearly doubled, from 18 to 35. Even more dramatic was the rise
> >> > > > > > in posts
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> mentioning Will Dockery, which rose from 10 to 29, nearly
> >> > > > > > triple. Which
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> gives the subject a Dockery Obsession Index of 82.86%.
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> I think these figures speak for themselves.
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > > > >>>>>> Most interesting survey, however, If I were you, I would be more
> >> > > > > > concerned with the weight of your wife and daughter, which seems far
> >> > > > > > more dangerous to health than my thinking Dockery is a twat, something
> >> > > > > > he has heard for 25 years from various folks and groups.
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > > > >>>>>> At 75, I carry 186 in weight, 6' in height on a 32-inch waist.
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > > > >>>>>> Personally, I think you should focus more on their health rather
> >> > > > > > than my interest in useless bums, or your dismal political career where
> >> > > > > > you posted 0 wins and 10 loses.
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > > > >>>>>> Other than that, I wish you a pleasant evening.
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > > > >>>>> I already replied to this post, but it's worth pointing out again it
> >> > > > > > >>>>> exists -
> >> > > > > > >>>>> Message-ID: <3f07292f-5935-441b...@googlegroups.com>
> >> > > > > > >>>>> - in light of the fact that
> >> > > > > > >>>>> (1) he deleted his reply, and declared (again) that he had left
> >> > > > > > aapc; and
> >> > > > > > >>>>> (2) his allies are now saying it was "posted behind his back,"
> >> > > > > > meaning
> >> > > > > > >>>>> he never saw it.
> >> > > > > > >>>> Since Senetto obviously read and replied to you, it was hardly
> >> > > > > > behind his back.
> >> > > > > > >>>>
> >> > > > > > >>>> So Pendragon is lying again, which is expected from a shit
> >> > > > > > slinging little monkey mother fucker like him.
> >> > > > > > >>>>
> >> > > > > > >>>> HTH and HAND.
> >> > > > > > >>> Sorry , empty head, I knew nothing of the cross post.
> >> > > > > > >> So what?
> >> > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > >> You read and replied to the post.
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > Asshole..the behind my back was the cross posting, which I knew
> >> > > > > > nothing about.
> >> > > > > > Your problem may be that you still don't understand how cross-posting
> >> > > > > > works. Cross-posting is posting one message, at one time, to more than
> >> > > > > > one usenet group.
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > I cross-posted two messages on this thread. We know you saw the first
> >> > > > > > one, even if you didn't read it, because you replied to it. You didn't
> >> > > > > > reply to the second, so we can't prove you saw that one; but it's hard
> >> > > > > > to believe you didn't see it either; and, besides, it was merely a
> >> > > > > > cleaned-up edit of the first one.
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > IOW - two posts, both of which you've seen, and had an opportunity to
> >> > > > > > read or reply to. If you didn't read 'em, that was purely by your own
> >> > > > > > choice.
> >> > > > > > > I assumed when I post here, it stays here.
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > I was wrong
> >> > > > > > And you still are, it seems.
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > No one else can cross-post *your* posts to another group but you. People
> >> > > > > > can cross-post their own posts only, not those of anyone else.
> >> > > > > > > and now I'll comment on Dunce knowing it will be read at the other
> >> > > > > > joint..
> >> > > > > > At least now you're letting us know that you didn't read either of the
> >> > > > > > posts in question.
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > As the archives show, one was an OP, the other a reply to it; neither
> >> > > > > > contained your "comment on Dunce" or any other "comments" by
> >> > > > > > anyone else. In fact, neither contained any backthread at all.
> >> > > > > > > Dunce is a scumbag.
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > and you, Dockery, a mother fucker.
> >> > > > > > And you, Mr. Senetto, appear to have OCD, as I've shown. But I'm not a
> >> > > > > > psychiatrist; you really should discuss your condition with one.
> >> > > > > Obsession is overtaking Senetto's feeble little mind.
> >> > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >> > > > > And so it goes.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Observation ingredients?
> >> > > Autocorrect typo corrected.
> >> > >
> >> > > Thanks for the heads up, Corey.
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> > No worries, Violet.
> >> That's cool, Pastor C.
> >>
> >> HTH and HAND.
>
> > Violet
> Troll much, Corey?
>
> 🙂

Never. That’s just your violet fantasy.