On Wednesday, November 9, 2022 at 1:41:39 PM UTC-5, Will Dockery wrote:
> On Wednesday, November 9, 2022 at 10:30:36 AM UTC-5, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> > On 2022-11-08 12:42 p.m., Michael Pendragon wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, November 8, 2022 at 2:22:51 AM UTC-5, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> > >> On 2022-11-03 3:39 p.m., Michael Pendragon wrote:
> > >>> On Thursday, November 3, 2022 at 3:05:19 PM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
> > >>>> Michael Pendragon wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> On Thursday, November 3, 2022 at 11:32:26 AM UTC-4,
> > >> george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> > >>>>>> On 2022-10-31 10:41 a.m., Michael Pendragon wrote:
> > >>>>>>> On Sunday, October 30, 2022 at 3:54:28 PM UTC-4, Ash Wurthing wrote:
> > >>>>>>>> On Sunday, October 30, 2022 at 2:13:28 PM UTC-4,
> > >> george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>> To October, by William Curtis
> > >>>>>>>>> -
> > >>>>>>>>> How bright, loved month, upon the fading brow
> > >>>>>>>>> Of yonder hill, with melancholy air
> > >>>>>>>>> Spreads thy sweet smile! How bright the hectic glow
> > >>>>>>>>> Of dying beauty on thy cheek so fair!
> > >>>>>>>>> [...]
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >> https://gdancesbetty.blogspot.com/2022/10/to-october-william-curtis.html
> > >>>>>>>> Sir Cankkkook, according to your very own ass opinion, your post
> > >> is OUT OF ORDER!! See your ass opinion's word below:
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> "We have a rule regarding the posting of links
> > >>>>>>>> and/or extracts from other sources here, Mack.
> > >>>>>>>> And that rule is that when we post someone else's
> > >>>>>>>> essay, poem, article, etc., we must also post
> > >>>>>>>> an *original* comment or question regarding it."
> > >>>>>>>> george...@yahoo.ca
> > >>>>>>>> Oct 28, 2022, 4:42:19 PM (yesterday)
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Good catch, Ash.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Ash has a point, George.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> I've just explained to Jim (at your request) that we are expected
> > >> to provide commentary with any links that we post. The same holds true
> > >> for you.
> > >>>>>> I made no such request. Must you lie about everything?
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Call it what you want, George. I was being polite.
> > >>>> You misrepresented George Dance, little monkey.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> But that's nothing new for you.
> > >>>
> > >>> How is the use of polite language a misrepresentation?
> > >>>
> > >> You claimed that I requested something that you knew I didn't. That's
> > >> not just misrepresentation but outright lying.
> > >
> > > You posted my comments under Jim's post and whined that the rules only apply to team Donkey.
> > >
> > > In the most polite terms, that can be taken as a request for me to extend those rules to the members of the supposed "team Monkey" as well.
> > >
> > > If, otoh, you were just whining for the sake of whining... god help you.
> > >
> > >
> > >>> However, if it will make you happy, I'll rephrase it more accurately:
> > >>>
> > >>> I had informed Mack (as a new member) that posting links without
> > >> commentary is against our GLs, and frowned upon.
> > >>>
> > >> That's almost true. The only false part is that you said anything about
> > >> your "GLs".
> > >
> > > I may not have specified that they were in the GLs, but the fact remains that they are.
> > >
> > >>> George Dance seized this opportunity to respond to one of Jim's posts
> > >> by reposting my message to Mack (above), along with a smarmy comment
> > >> implying that the GLs were being selectively enforced.
> > >>>
> > >> And there you go lying again. I didn't make any "smarmy comment" to the
> > >> Chimp about "the GLs ... bein selectively enforced." In fact, I didn't
> > >> make any comment to the Chimp at all. I just sent him your rule.
> > >
> > > You made a smarmy comment about the rules only applying to certain individuals.
> > >
> > >> I didn't make any comment to the Chimp. I simply posted him your rule,
> > >>> I brought the matter to Jim's attention, and he promised to adhere to
> > >> the GLs from here on in.
> > >> He should have stood up to you. In fact, I think I'll write and tell him
> > >> that. He probably won't read it, either, but it will be archived.
> > >
> > > He should have stood up to me regarding what?
> > >
> > >>> Ash then informed George that he was being something of a hypocrite,
> > >> as he regularly posts links without commentary -- which I also allowed
> > >> to pass.
> > >>>
> > >> What do you mean, you "allowed" them to pass? There's no rule against
> > >> it. Sometimes I have to wonder who the fuck you think you are.
> > >
> > > Michael Malefica Grendelwolf Pendragon LeFay.
> > >
> > > The name says it all.
> > >
> > >>> I then told George that Ash had a valid point, and that George should
> > >> adhere to the GLs as well.
> > >>>
> > >> Once again, there was no discussion of "GLs" in any of this. It's not
> > >> that big a deal for you to pretend that we were talkin about that, but
> > >> you are pretending.
> > >
> > > Whether mentioned directly or not, that is what was being discussed.
> > >
> > >> Your "accurate description" is no more honest than your "polite"
> > >> description.
> > >
> > > I'm sorry. Allow me to correct.
> > >
> > > You whined, on at least two threads, that the rule against posting links without accompanying commentary applies only to team Donkey.
> > >
> > That's not true at all. I never said there was such a rule, applying to
> > anyone. Just because you're replying in a different thread doesn't you
> > get to make up what I've said in other threads.
> > >>> The last time I looked, George posted a comment along with his link,
> > >> so hopefully this tempest in a teapot has blown over.
> > >>>
> > >> Given that you've since trolled two more PPP threads, with the same "GL"
> > >> misinformation, this one had to be revisited.
> > >
> > > Your PPP threads are Spam and, lacking commentary, are in violation of our GLs.
> > Once again: you haven't shown that aapc has any GLs. You've been
> > flaunting a post of yours you titled "AAPC - OFFICIAL GUIDELINES &
> > FAQs", but so far all we've seen is that post of yours and you flaunting
> > it.
> > >>> I don't understand why George should be upset at my referring to his
> > >> post in a positive light -- but this recap will hopefully mollify him.
> > >
> > >> Oh, stop pretending that you're getting me 'upset'. I'm simply pointing
> > >> out your dishonesty in pretending that I support this rule that you (and
> > >> possibly unknown others) have come up with.
> > If you joined a group I moderate, and started posting your own "OFFICIAL
> > GUIDELINES & FAQs" on it, I'd kick your butt out of there.
> I've been posting here for over twenty years.
>
> It takes more than a shit spewing little monkey like Pendragon to simply walk in and take over a Usenet newsgroup.

The GLs don't apply to you Donkey. They're for members only.

I suggest you take your own oft-repeated advice and "just skip and ignore."