On 23/09/2021 6:57 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 23/09/2021 8:30 pm, Xeno wrote:
>> On 23/9/21 8:18 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>
>>> It'll be the same repetitive, mouth frothing shit they spew day after
>>> endless day. That's all these mental midgets ever do. They're locked
>>> into this imaginary infantile world where they think they rule the
>>> roost and have complete control over everyone, whereas the reality is
>>> that they're nothing but a bunch of pathetic fixated retards that are
>>> about as popular as a turd in a bathtub and *almost* as smart.
>>>
>>> Takes all kinds to make the world go around....
>>>
>>
>> Mirror, Mirror!
>>
>>
>
> the world would turn more smoothly without toxic persons like him
>
>

I do like the way he describes himself but projects it onto others.

On 25/09/2021 10:56 am, Clocky wrote:
> On 23/09/2021 6:57 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>> On 23/09/2021 8:30 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>> On 23/9/21 8:18 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>>
>>>> It'll be the same repetitive, mouth frothing shit they spew day
>>>> after endless day. That's all these mental midgets ever do. They're
>>>> locked into this imaginary infantile world where they think they
>>>> rule the roost and have complete control over everyone, whereas the
>>>> reality is that they're nothing but a bunch of pathetic fixated
>>>> retards that are about as popular as a turd in a bathtub and
>>>> *almost* as smart.
>>>>
>>>> Takes all kinds to make the world go around....
>>>>
>>>
>>> Mirror, Mirror!
>>>
>>>
>>
>> the world would turn more smoothly without toxic persons like him
>>
>>
>
>
> I do like the way he describes himself but projects it onto others.
>
>
>

noddy, and now keefy and jonz, are in the category of not to be taken
seriously and largely ignored

--
"A mans got to know his limitations"
- clint Eastwood as Dirty Harry

On Fri, 17 Sep 2021 16:16:48 +1000, Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid>
wrote:

>At the present rate, I'll need to fill the XV's tank with petrol some
>time in the next few weeks.
>
>Sylvia.

Better hurry!

https://tinyurl.com/yzbvm2uw

On 24/09/2021 10:36 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 24/09/2021 5:49 pm, alvey wrote:
>> On Fri, 24 Sep 2021 16:38:31 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>
>>> On 24/09/2021 6:24 am, alvey wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 23 Sep 2021 17:17:01 +1000, alvey wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, 23 Sep 2021 13:15:58 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 12:15 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 10:57 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 10:07 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 23 Sep 2021 08:45:30 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 6:54 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 22 Sep 2021 22:15:21 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 21/09/2021 6:21 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh btw Der Der, I notice that you're still reading all my
>>>>>>>>>>>>> posts.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> lol.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Lets see how this works, I'll type it slowly so that you can
>>>>>>>>>>>> understand,
>>>>>>>>>>>> you can stick your tongue out if it helps.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 1) Little alvey makes a post.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) Somebody who hasn't got him plonked (E.G. jonz) replies
>>>>>>>>>>>> quoting
>>>>>>>>>>>> little alveys post.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 3) Noddy who hasn't got that person (E.G. jonz) plonked sees
>>>>>>>>>>>> his post
>>>>>>>>>>>> including your words of wisdom
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 4) Noddy replies to that post with your quote.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> See, simple isn't it, that's the way that Usenet works.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> If you still don't understand  then either you are more stupid
>>>>>>>>>>>> than max
>>>>>>>>>>>> or willfully igorant, and that is just as bad as anything
>>>>>>>>>>>> that you've
>>>>>>>>>>>> accused noddy of being.
>>>>>>>>>>> lol. "willfully igorant".
>>>>>>>>>>> Another contender for 'Pyto of the Moth' from keith.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Anyhoo keith... everybody here (except Der Der. Ask about his
>>>>>>>>>>> "private
>>>>>>>>>>> conversation" interpretation sometime. It's a real hoot!) has a
>>>>>>>>>>> reasonable
>>>>>>>>>>> grasp of how usenet works. The flaw in your primer is once again
>>>>>>>>>>> that you
>>>>>>>>>>> are an ocassional visitor to this swamp. You see Der Der has an
>>>>>>>>>>> indisputable history of wanting to be so quick to spew some
>>>>>>>>>>> of his
>>>>>>>>>>> bile
>>>>>>>>>>> about that he's forgotten that he's repeatedly brayed, 'I
>>>>>>>>>>> *never* read
>>>>>>>>>>> nnnnnnnn's posts' and replied *directly* to the named Binee.
>>>>>>>>>> Examples?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It's also transparently obvious, to some anyway, that the
>>>>>>>>>>> buffoon
>>>>>>>>>>> has read
>>>>>>>>>>> 'invisible' posts by references he later makes. And then
>>>>>>>>>>> there's his
>>>>>>>>>>> sociopathic personality. He simply cannot *not* know if anything
>>>>>>>>>>> has been
>>>>>>>>>>> written about him.
>>>>>>>>>> Examples?
>>>>>>>>> "examples"?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Unlike The Fraud, that's a bit rich keith. How about you answer my
>>>>>>>>> questions for a change? I gave you an example of The Fraud
>>>>>>>>> lying his
>>>>>>>>> fool
>>>>>>>>> head off and you've made no "relevant" comment on it. (Mind
>>>>>>>>> you, that
>>>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>>> better than Gumps' response). Now you want me to dig through
>>>>>>>>> the cesspit
>>>>>>>>> *again*? You're much like the Bumhole (Vic) Bogan keith, very
>>>>>>>>> keen on
>>>>>>>>> asking questions, shithouse at answering them.
>>>>>>>> A long way of say that you can't.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> so you expect alvey to remember some occasions, and dredge them
>>>>>>> up and
>>>>>>> post here, because you don't believe him? (and me) also I know
>>>>>>> clocky
>>>>>>> and Xeno would also confirm, and possibly even jonz could except
>>>>>>> he's a
>>>>>>> noddy devotee now, but you don't require noddy, a proven liar, to
>>>>>>> justify any of his claims to you? interesting...
>>>>>> He made the assertion either he proves it or he is a proven liar.
>>>>> Nope. Wrong *again* keith. And badly so.
>>>>>
>>>>> The "assertion", unlike the Fraudsters Big Claims, has been previously
>>>>> proven.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ergo, you're assrting that Der Der is "a proven liar". Well done.
>>>>>
>>>> What? Nothing from keith? There's a surprise...
>>>>
>>>> alvey
>>>> He's probably at a Lightweights Anonymous meeting.
>>>>
>>> Since the level of your conversation has achieved that of a rather nasty
>>> fifteen year old girl,
>> You mean like this keith? "Thanks to all who replied with constructive
>> suggestions, alvey and felix can go fuck themselves with a piece of
>> barbed
>> wire." Kidz today.
>>
>>> you need not expect a reply from me
>> Bit late for that keith. You wimped out so many times that I gave up
>> expecting a reply from you ages ago. You're just another Gumps.
>>
>>> to any more of your monotonous crap.
>> Aye aye Cap'n Cliche.
>>
>>> BTW rather than running away this is is a mark
>>> of the respect that I hold for you. You just ain't worth the effort.
>> lol. Picked it.
>> And it *is* a runaway CC.
>>> P.S. No killfile involved, I'll just be ignoring you unless *I* decide
>>> to do otherwise.
>> Ummm. Who else would be "deciding" keith? And how will you "decide"
>> whether
>> to reply? Why you'll have to read 'em! Yor a jenios keith.
>> And you sure not have way with words.
>>
>> Anyhoo, good luck with your new friends!
>> I'm confident that with your personality and characteristics you'll fit
>> right in!
>>
>> Hoo roo!
>
>
> keefy has slid well down the scale in my estimation also. his lack of
> integrity and self respect is abundantly clear. seems he likes wallowing
> in the sewer.
>
>

The 'I don't care' argument doesn't work when the person your doing the
not caring about is the most toxic and dishonest person this group has
ever seen. You lose *all* integrity when you turn your head and start
victim blaming.

On 24/09/2021 4:37 am, alvey wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Sep 2021 20:03:11 +1000, Noddy wrote:
>
>> On 23/09/2021 5:44 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 23/09/2021 5:33 pm, alvey wrote:
>>
>>>> claim about his father "fighting in Korea" being proven as a lie *isn't*
>>>> relevant to this group? Yes? No?
>>>
>>> Last I heard, this group is supposed to be about cars, so both noddys
>>> father and you are both irrelevant.
>>
>> Indeed they are.
>>
>> Yelva could do himself a *massive* favour by realizing that he's *not*
>> the centre of anyone's universe and no one gives a flying fuck about
>> what he chooses to believe.
>
> I don't know what The Fraudsters PB is for using the 'Spokesperson
> Position' in a thread but this one must be giving it a real shake.
>
>
>
> alvey
>

People with zero integrity have lost their voice, no matter how loud the
noise.

On Sat, 25 Sep 2021 09:15:57 +0800, Clocky wrote:

> On 24/09/2021 10:36 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>> On 24/09/2021 5:49 pm, alvey wrote:
>>> On Fri, 24 Sep 2021 16:38:31 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 24/09/2021 6:24 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 23 Sep 2021 17:17:01 +1000, alvey wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, 23 Sep 2021 13:15:58 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 12:15 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 10:57 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 10:07 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 23 Sep 2021 08:45:30 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 6:54 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 22 Sep 2021 22:15:21 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 21/09/2021 6:21 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh btw Der Der, I notice that you're still reading all my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> posts.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lol.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lets see how this works, I'll type it slowly so that you can
>>>>>>>>>>>>> understand,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> you can stick your tongue out if it helps.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1) Little alvey makes a post.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) Somebody who hasn't got him plonked (E.G. jonz) replies
>>>>>>>>>>>>> quoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>> little alveys post.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3) Noddy who hasn't got that person (E.G. jonz) plonked sees
>>>>>>>>>>>>> his post
>>>>>>>>>>>>> including your words of wisdom
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4) Noddy replies to that post with your quote.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> See, simple isn't it, that's the way that Usenet works.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you still don't understand  then either you are more stupid
>>>>>>>>>>>>> than max
>>>>>>>>>>>>> or willfully igorant, and that is just as bad as anything
>>>>>>>>>>>>> that you've
>>>>>>>>>>>>> accused noddy of being.
>>>>>>>>>>>> lol. "willfully igorant".
>>>>>>>>>>>> Another contender for 'Pyto of the Moth' from keith.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyhoo keith... everybody here (except Der Der. Ask about his
>>>>>>>>>>>> "private
>>>>>>>>>>>> conversation" interpretation sometime. It's a real hoot!) has a
>>>>>>>>>>>> reasonable
>>>>>>>>>>>> grasp of how usenet works. The flaw in your primer is once again
>>>>>>>>>>>> that you
>>>>>>>>>>>> are an ocassional visitor to this swamp. You see Der Der has an
>>>>>>>>>>>> indisputable history of wanting to be so quick to spew some
>>>>>>>>>>>> of his
>>>>>>>>>>>> bile
>>>>>>>>>>>> about that he's forgotten that he's repeatedly brayed, 'I
>>>>>>>>>>>> *never* read
>>>>>>>>>>>> nnnnnnnn's posts' and replied *directly* to the named Binee.
>>>>>>>>>>> Examples?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> It's also transparently obvious, to some anyway, that the
>>>>>>>>>>>> buffoon
>>>>>>>>>>>> has read
>>>>>>>>>>>> 'invisible' posts by references he later makes. And then
>>>>>>>>>>>> there's his
>>>>>>>>>>>> sociopathic personality. He simply cannot *not* know if anything
>>>>>>>>>>>> has been
>>>>>>>>>>>> written about him.
>>>>>>>>>>> Examples?
>>>>>>>>>> "examples"?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Unlike The Fraud, that's a bit rich keith. How about you answer my
>>>>>>>>>> questions for a change? I gave you an example of The Fraud
>>>>>>>>>> lying his
>>>>>>>>>> fool
>>>>>>>>>> head off and you've made no "relevant" comment on it. (Mind
>>>>>>>>>> you, that
>>>>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>>>> better than Gumps' response). Now you want me to dig through
>>>>>>>>>> the cesspit
>>>>>>>>>> *again*? You're much like the Bumhole (Vic) Bogan keith, very
>>>>>>>>>> keen on
>>>>>>>>>> asking questions, shithouse at answering them.
>>>>>>>>> A long way of say that you can't.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> so you expect alvey to remember some occasions, and dredge them
>>>>>>>> up and
>>>>>>>> post here, because you don't believe him? (and me) also I know
>>>>>>>> clocky
>>>>>>>> and Xeno would also confirm, and possibly even jonz could except
>>>>>>>> he's a
>>>>>>>> noddy devotee now, but you don't require noddy, a proven liar, to
>>>>>>>> justify any of his claims to you? interesting...
>>>>>>> He made the assertion either he proves it or he is a proven liar.
>>>>>> Nope. Wrong *again* keith. And badly so.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The "assertion", unlike the Fraudsters Big Claims, has been previously
>>>>>> proven.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ergo, you're assrting that Der Der is "a proven liar". Well done.
>>>>>>
>>>>> What? Nothing from keith? There's a surprise...
>>>>>
>>>>> alvey
>>>>> He's probably at a Lightweights Anonymous meeting.
>>>>>
>>>> Since the level of your conversation has achieved that of a rather nasty
>>>> fifteen year old girl,
>>> You mean like this keith? "Thanks to all who replied with constructive
>>> suggestions, alvey and felix can go fuck themselves with a piece of
>>> barbed
>>> wire." Kidz today.
>>>
>>>> you need not expect a reply from me
>>> Bit late for that keith. You wimped out so many times that I gave up
>>> expecting a reply from you ages ago. You're just another Gumps.
>>>
>>>> to any more of your monotonous crap.
>>> Aye aye Cap'n Cliche.
>>>
>>>> BTW rather than running away this is is a mark
>>>> of the respect that I hold for you. You just ain't worth the effort.
>>> lol. Picked it.
>>> And it *is* a runaway CC.
>>>> P.S. No killfile involved, I'll just be ignoring you unless *I* decide
>>>> to do otherwise.
>>> Ummm. Who else would be "deciding" keith? And how will you "decide"
>>> whether
>>> to reply? Why you'll have to read 'em! Yor a jenios keith.
>>> And you sure not have way with words.
>>>
>>> Anyhoo, good luck with your new friends!
>>> I'm confident that with your personality and characteristics you'll fit
>>> right in!
>>>
>>> Hoo roo!
>>
>> keefy has slid well down the scale in my estimation also. his lack of
>> integrity and self respect is abundantly clear. seems he likes wallowing
>> in the sewer.
>>
>
> The 'I don't care' argument doesn't work when the person your doing the
> not caring about is the most toxic and dishonest person this group has
> ever seen. You lose *all* integrity when you turn your head and start
> victim blaming.
>
> Something all of NoddyLiar's enablers have in common... they're all
> willing to sell their soul to the devil.

On 25/09/2021 11:19 am, Clocky wrote:
> On 24/09/2021 4:37 am, alvey wrote:
>> On Thu, 23 Sep 2021 20:03:11 +1000, Noddy wrote:
>>
>>> On 23/09/2021 5:44 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>> On 23/09/2021 5:33 pm, alvey wrote:
>>>
>>>>> claim about his father "fighting in Korea" being proven as a lie
>>>>> *isn't*
>>>>> relevant to this group? Yes? No?
>>>>
>>>> Last I heard, this group is supposed to be about cars, so both noddys
>>>> father and you are both irrelevant.
>>>
>>> Indeed they are.
>>>
>>> Yelva could do himself a *massive* favour by realizing that he's *not*
>>> the centre of anyone's universe and no one gives a flying fuck about
>>> what he chooses to believe.
>>
>> I don't know what The Fraudsters PB is for using the 'Spokesperson
>> Position' in a thread but this one must be giving it a real shake.
>>
>>
>>
>> alvey
>>
>
>
> People with zero integrity have lost their voice, no matter how loud
> the noise.

that's well put

--
"A mans got to know his limitations"
- clint Eastwood as Dirty Harry

On 25/09/2021 9:25 am, keithr0 wrote:
> On 25/09/2021 12:41 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:

>> noddy is grooming keefy, who's too dumb to not fall for his
>> distortions of reality
>
> ROTFL, you really are a funny guy. Grooming? I wouldn't have believed
> that anybody could be so stupid if it wasn't here in black and white.

As I've said. 10 year olds in tree houses make more sensible comments
than these fuckwits.

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

Noddy <me@home.com> wrote:
> On 25/09/2021 9:25 am, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 25/09/2021 12:41 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>
>>> noddy is grooming keefy, who's too dumb to not fall for his
>>> distortions of reality
>>
>> ROTFL, you really are a funny guy. Grooming? I wouldn't have believed
>> that anybody could be so stupid if it wasn't here in black and white.
>
> As I've said. 10 year olds in tree houses make more sensible comments
> than these fuckwits.
>

Mirror mirror!

——-
Xeno

On 9/25/2021 12:29 AM, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 24/09/2021 4:56 pm, Noddy wrote:
>> On 24/09/2021 3:47 pm, jonz wrote:
>>> On 9/23/2021 8:51 PM, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>
>>>> it makes perfect sense, what is wrong with you. I'll try again.. I
>>>> can speak Ukrainian. I tell you I can speak Ukrainian. you don't
>>>> believe me and say 'prove it'. I choose not to prove it to you.
>>>> does that mean then that I cannot speak Ukrainian? Of course not,
>>>> because I CAN speak Ukrainian. so I am not lying (telling a lie)
>>>> simply because I don't prove what I say. you claimed alvey was
>>>> lying because he chose not to prove what he claimed to be true. if
>>>> something is true or not it remains so regardless of what ppl may
>>>> believe or not about it. belief is irrelevant to fact.
>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> So, A noddy supporter now?.  Go with the strength eh?. ;)
>>
>> ROTFL :)
>>
>> Smacked himself firmly in the jaw with that one. Next he'll be
>> demanding that Clasener prove all his claims :)
>>
>
> I'm supporting alvey against keith's criticism you brain dead morons

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 Tell someone that cares pussy. <FBG>

>
>

--
"Usenet is like a herd of performing elephants with diarrhea. Massive,
difficult to redirect, awe-inspiring, entertaining, and a source of
mind-boggling amounts of excrement when you least expect it." — Gene
Spafford, 1992

On 9/25/2021 9:26 AM, keithr0 wrote:
> On 25/09/2021 12:36 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>> On 24/09/2021 5:49 pm, alvey wrote:
>>> On Fri, 24 Sep 2021 16:38:31 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 24/09/2021 6:24 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 23 Sep 2021 17:17:01 +1000, alvey wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, 23 Sep 2021 13:15:58 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 12:15 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 10:57 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 10:07 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 23 Sep 2021 08:45:30 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 6:54 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 22 Sep 2021 22:15:21 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 21/09/2021 6:21 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh btw Der Der, I notice that you're still reading all my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> posts.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lol.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lets see how this works, I'll type it slowly so that you can
>>>>>>>>>>>>> understand,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> you can stick your tongue out if it helps.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1) Little alvey makes a post.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) Somebody who hasn't got him plonked (E.G. jonz) replies
>>>>>>>>>>>>> quoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>> little alveys post.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3) Noddy who hasn't got that person (E.G. jonz) plonked
>>>>>>>>>>>>> sees his post
>>>>>>>>>>>>> including your words of wisdom
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4) Noddy replies to that post with your quote.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> See, simple isn't it, that's the way that Usenet works.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you still don't understand  then either you are more
>>>>>>>>>>>>> stupid
>>>>>>>>>>>>> than max
>>>>>>>>>>>>> or willfully igorant, and that is just as bad as anything
>>>>>>>>>>>>> that you've
>>>>>>>>>>>>> accused noddy of being.
>>>>>>>>>>>> lol. "willfully igorant".
>>>>>>>>>>>> Another contender for 'Pyto of the Moth' from keith.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyhoo keith... everybody here (except Der Der. Ask about
>>>>>>>>>>>> his "private
>>>>>>>>>>>> conversation" interpretation sometime. It's a real hoot!)
>>>>>>>>>>>> has a
>>>>>>>>>>>> reasonable
>>>>>>>>>>>> grasp of how usenet works. The flaw in your primer is once
>>>>>>>>>>>> again
>>>>>>>>>>>> that you
>>>>>>>>>>>> are an ocassional visitor to this swamp. You see Der Der
>>>>>>>>>>>> has an
>>>>>>>>>>>> indisputable history of wanting to be so quick to spew some
>>>>>>>>>>>> of his
>>>>>>>>>>>> bile
>>>>>>>>>>>> about that he's forgotten that he's repeatedly brayed, 'I
>>>>>>>>>>>> *never* read
>>>>>>>>>>>> nnnnnnnn's posts' and replied *directly* to the named Binee.
>>>>>>>>>>> Examples?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> It's also transparently obvious, to some anyway, that the
>>>>>>>>>>>> buffoon
>>>>>>>>>>>> has read
>>>>>>>>>>>> 'invisible' posts by references he later makes. And then
>>>>>>>>>>>> there's his
>>>>>>>>>>>> sociopathic personality. He simply cannot *not* know if
>>>>>>>>>>>> anything
>>>>>>>>>>>> has been
>>>>>>>>>>>> written about him.
>>>>>>>>>>> Examples?
>>>>>>>>>> "examples"?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Unlike The Fraud, that's a bit rich keith. How about you
>>>>>>>>>> answer my
>>>>>>>>>> questions for a change? I gave you an example of The Fraud
>>>>>>>>>> lying his
>>>>>>>>>> fool
>>>>>>>>>> head off and you've made no "relevant" comment on it. (Mind
>>>>>>>>>> you, that
>>>>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>>>> better than Gumps' response). Now you want me to dig through
>>>>>>>>>> the cesspit
>>>>>>>>>> *again*? You're much like the Bumhole (Vic) Bogan keith, very
>>>>>>>>>> keen on
>>>>>>>>>> asking questions, shithouse at answering them.
>>>>>>>>> A long way of say that you can't.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> so you expect alvey to remember some occasions, and dredge them
>>>>>>>> up and
>>>>>>>> post here, because you don't believe him? (and me) also I know
>>>>>>>> clocky
>>>>>>>> and Xeno would also confirm, and possibly even jonz could
>>>>>>>> except he's a
>>>>>>>> noddy devotee now, but you don't require noddy, a proven liar, to
>>>>>>>> justify any of his claims to you? interesting...
>>>>>>> He made the assertion either he proves it or he is a proven liar.
>>>>>> Nope. Wrong *again* keith. And badly so.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The "assertion", unlike the Fraudsters Big Claims, has been
>>>>>> previously
>>>>>> proven.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ergo, you're assrting that Der Der is "a proven liar". Well done.
>>>>>>
>>>>> What? Nothing from keith? There's a surprise...
>>>>>
>>>>> alvey
>>>>> He's probably at a Lightweights Anonymous meeting.
>>>>>
>>>> Since the level of your conversation has achieved that of a rather
>>>> nasty
>>>> fifteen year old girl,
>>> You mean like this keith? "Thanks to all who replied with constructive
>>> suggestions, alvey and felix can go fuck themselves with a piece of
>>> barbed
>>> wire." Kidz today.
>>>
>>>> you need not expect a reply from me
>>> Bit late for that keith. You wimped out so many times that I gave up
>>> expecting a reply from you ages ago. You're just another Gumps.
>>>
>>>> to any more of your monotonous crap.
>>> Aye aye Cap'n Cliche.
>>>
>>>> BTW rather than running away this is is a mark
>>>> of the respect that I hold for you. You just ain't worth the effort.
>>> lol. Picked it.
>>> And it *is* a runaway CC.
>>>> P.S. No killfile involved, I'll just be ignoring you unless *I* decide
>>>> to do otherwise.
>>> Ummm. Who else would be "deciding" keith? And how will you "decide"
>>> whether
>>> to reply? Why you'll have to read 'em! Yor a jenios keith.
>>> And you sure not have way with words.
>>>
>>> Anyhoo, good luck with your new friends!
>>> I'm confident that with your personality and characteristics you'll fit
>>> right in!
>>>
>>> Hoo roo!
>>
>>
>> keefy has slid well down the scale in my estimation also. his lack of
>> integrity and self respect is abundantly clear. seems he likes
>> wallowing in the sewer.
>
> Quite a turn of phrase there little felix, where did you steal it from.

On 23/09/2021 2:24 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> On 23/09/2021 3:38 pm, Clocky wrote:
>> On 23/09/2021 6:56 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 23/09/2021 8:18 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>> On 23/09/2021 7:12 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 22 Sep 2021 19:37:27 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 20/09/2021 7:55 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>> On 20/09/2021 4:00 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 20/09/2021 7:07 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 19 Sep 2021 17:13:15 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 19/09/2021 4:24 pm, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 19 Sep 2021 09:08:14 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 19/09/2021 7:06 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 18 Sep 2021 22:50:29 +1000, Daryl wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 18/9/21 10:21 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 18/09/2021 9:49 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 18/9/21 9:38 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 18/09/2021 8:29 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 18/9/21 7:45 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 18/09/2021 6:06 pm, Daryl wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 18/9/21 5:08 pm, Max wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/09/2021 4:16 pm, Sylvia Else wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> At the present rate, I'll need to fill the XV's tank
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with petrol
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some time in the next few weeks.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sylvia.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What is an XV ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sylvia is a pilot so I assume its her aircraft:-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hint, use your computer skills to look it up,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Google is your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> friend".
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well the EA81 engine is very popular in light
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> aircraft! ;-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Making excuses for stupidity now?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not at all. Surely an expert like you would have known
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that they
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> manufactured aircraft.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nakajima_Aircraft_Company
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sad that an expert like you is so ill informed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Even more sad that the *experts* here don't take notice of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> said. Sylvia has mentioned more than once that she has a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subaru XV.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Such a pity too that these very same experts aren't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> aware that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> current lockdowns and sundry travel restrictions have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> restricted car
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> use which means, obviously enough, they *use less fuel*.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Daryl fell flat on his face and you followed him down, deal
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FFS you idiot. Daryl was being funny and I just followed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> along
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> joke. Note he told the guy to google it and the smiley
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> after his
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comment. Sometimes you just look for a fight. Apart from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as stated
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Subaru EA81 is well used in light aircraft. Look it up.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oxygen thief.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well said, it was very obviously a joke meant for the troll.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> A fine example of The Trump Effect.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> This being that a large section of the population will now not
>>>>>>>>>>>>> admit that
>>>>>>>>>>>>> they stuffed up. Rather than the traditional admission or
>>>>>>>>>>>>> apology, what we
>>>>>>>>>>>>> get now are lies. People in Oz from our idiotic, blowhard
>>>>>>>>>>>>> prime
>>>>>>>>>>>>> minister to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> failed dunny cleaners have adopted it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> alvey
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unable to recall Deryl ever attempting to make a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (deliberate) joke.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Unable to recall alvey ever making a useful post.
>>>>>>>>>>> Ooooooh! Now keefs unleashed 'derivative'. Gasp! How twee.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> But btw keefy, are you opining that putting up posts proving
>>>>>>>>>>> that your
>>>>>>>>>>> cowardly little friend in Bumhole (Vic) is a lying fraud
>>>>>>>>>>> *aren't*
>>>>>>>>>>> "useful"?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> oty "hero".
>>>>>>>>>> Yes. (BTW I can't recall your posts ever proving anything)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> oty yuppy scum
>>>>>>>>> lol! I wish. Well, about the "y" part of "yuppy" anyway.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Anyhow... As you are an ocassional visitor to this cesspit your
>>>>>>>>> claim
>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>> you "can't recall" something is, like most of your posts,
>>>>>>>>> meaningless, and
>>>>>>>>> it certainly doesn't warrant me digging out the *relevant* posts.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> But just as a quick example... I recently came across this old
>>>>>>>>> claim
>>>>>>>>> by The
>>>>>>>>> Fraudster, "My old man was a returned serviceman Ron (he fought in
>>>>>>>>> Korea)
>>>>>>>>> and *hated* Asians with a passion…” Fraudster, 09Oct08.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> For a couple of reasons, this stunk like old prawns to me so
>>>>>>>>> off to the
>>>>>>>>> excellent DVA records I went and sure enough, there was no
>>>>>>>>> record of any
>>>>>>>>> Gibbens fighting in the Korean conflict. Check it yourself if
>>>>>>>>> you like.
>>>>>>>>> https://nominal-rolls.dva.gov.au/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So keefy, would you say that was a "relevant" post? And how do
>>>>>>>>> you,
>>>>>>>>> as an
>>>>>>>>> ex-forces person, feel about someone faking a connection to a
>>>>>>>>> Digger?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> oty keith.
>>>>>>>> Nope, just part of the crap that you and your mates push out on a
>>>>>>>> daily basis. It ain't signal, it's just noise.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So it doesn't bother you that the fraud is faking his old mans
>>>>>>> service
>>>>>>> record?
>>>>>> I don't know whether he is faking anything or not, and neither do
>>>>>> you.
>>>>>> You're just taking alveys unreliable attempts
>>>>> "unreliable" eh keith? Please do elaborate.
>>>>>
>>>>>> at research as true
>>>>>> because that is what you want to believe.
>>>>> Psst. You forgot to put The Frauds idiotic phrase in quotes.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Basically I don't give a shit
>>>>>> whether it's true or not, it doesn't affect me either way one
>>>>>> little bit.
>>>>> Clearly. So, in summary, you don't care about hanging/supporting a
>>>>> lying
>>>>> fraud. You'd rather try and attack the people telling the truth
>>>>> about him?
>>>>> That about right?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> apparently
>>>
>>>
>>> Little felix peeked from under the curtain and squeaked "Me too"
>>>
>>
>> Are you just playing devil's advocate for some attention or are you
>> losing the plot?
>
> No and no.

On Sat, 25 Sep 2021 13:15:01 +1000, Noddy wrote:

> On 25/09/2021 9:25 am, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 25/09/2021 12:41 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>
>>> noddy is grooming keefy, who's too dumb to not fall for his
>>> distortions of reality
>>
>> ROTFL, you really are a funny guy. Grooming? I wouldn't have believed
>> that anybody could be so stupid if it wasn't here in black and white.
>
> As I've said. 10 year olds in tree houses make more sensible comments
> than these fuckwits.

Alas Fraudster, what you've also said is that you owned a successful
business, that you have multiple quals, that your old man fought in Korea,
that you're a member of VACC, that you own a property on the Sunshine Coast
and a shedload more lies. So anything tangible you claim isn't worth a
pinch of shit, and any opinion you bleat is worth substantially less.

alvey

On 25 Sep 2021 03:56:47 GMT, Xeno wrote:

> Noddy <me@home.com> wrote:
>> On 25/09/2021 9:25 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 25/09/2021 12:41 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>
>>>> noddy is grooming keefy, who's too dumb to not fall for his
>>>> distortions of reality
>>>
>>> ROTFL, you really are a funny guy. Grooming? I wouldn't have believed
>>> that anybody could be so stupid if it wasn't here in black and white.
>>
>> As I've said. 10 year olds in tree houses make more sensible comments
>> than these fuckwits.
>>
>
> Mirror mirror!

What *is* The Fraud's fixation with this analogy? Aside from stupid. What
10yo wouldn't want a treehouse? Especially if they lived in Bumhole (Vic)
where they're not an option due to the lack of trees. The poor tykes there
have to use a ground level, plastic KMart dog kennel. *And* share it with
the dog.

alvey

On 25/09/2021 11:55 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 25/09/2021 11:19 am, Clocky wrote:
>> On 24/09/2021 4:37 am, alvey wrote:
>>> On Thu, 23 Sep 2021 20:03:11 +1000, Noddy wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 23/09/2021 5:44 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>> On 23/09/2021 5:33 pm, alvey wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> claim about his father "fighting in Korea" being proven as a lie
>>>>>> *isn't*
>>>>>> relevant to this group? Yes? No?
>>>>>
>>>>> Last I heard, this group is supposed to be about cars, so both noddys
>>>>> father and you are both irrelevant.
>>>>
>>>> Indeed they are.
>>>>
>>>> Yelva could do himself a *massive* favour by realizing that he's *not*
>>>> the centre of anyone's universe and no one gives a flying fuck about
>>>> what he chooses to believe.
>>>
>>> I don't know what The Fraudsters PB is for using the 'Spokesperson
>>> Position' in a thread but this one must be giving it a real shake.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> alvey
>>>
>>
>>
>> People with zero integrity have lost their voice, no matter how loud
>> the noise.
>
>
> that's well put
>
Little felix peeked from behind the curtain and squeaked "Me too"

On 23/09/2021 3:16 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> On 23/09/2021 4:10 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>> On 23/09/2021 1:15 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 23/09/2021 12:15 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>> On 23/09/2021 10:57 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>> On 23/09/2021 10:07 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, 23 Sep 2021 08:45:30 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 6:54 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Wed, 22 Sep 2021 22:15:21 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 21/09/2021 6:21 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Oh btw Der Der, I notice that you're still reading all my
>>>>>>>>>> posts. lol.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Lets see how this works, I'll type it slowly so that you can
>>>>>>>>> understand,
>>>>>>>>> you can stick your tongue out if it helps.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 1) Little alvey makes a post.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2) Somebody who hasn't got him plonked (E.G. jonz) replies quoting
>>>>>>>>> little alveys post.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 3) Noddy who hasn't got that person (E.G. jonz) plonked sees
>>>>>>>>> his post
>>>>>>>>> including your words of wisdom
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 4) Noddy replies to that post with your quote.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> See, simple isn't it, that's the way that Usenet works.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If you still don't understand  then either you are more stupid
>>>>>>>>> than max
>>>>>>>>> or willfully igorant, and that is just as bad as anything that
>>>>>>>>> you've
>>>>>>>>> accused noddy of being.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> lol. "willfully igorant".
>>>>>>>> Another contender for 'Pyto of the Moth' from keith.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Anyhoo keith... everybody here (except Der Der. Ask about his
>>>>>>>> "private
>>>>>>>> conversation" interpretation sometime. It's a real hoot!) has a
>>>>>>>> reasonable
>>>>>>>> grasp of how usenet works. The flaw in your primer is once again
>>>>>>>> that you
>>>>>>>> are an ocassional visitor to this swamp. You see Der Der has an
>>>>>>>> indisputable history of wanting to be so quick to spew some of
>>>>>>>> his bile
>>>>>>>> about that he's forgotten that he's repeatedly brayed, 'I
>>>>>>>> *never* read
>>>>>>>> nnnnnnnn's posts' and replied *directly* to the named Binee.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Examples?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It's also transparently obvious, to some anyway, that the
>>>>>>>> buffoon has read
>>>>>>>> 'invisible' posts by references he later makes. And then there's
>>>>>>>> his
>>>>>>>> sociopathic personality. He simply cannot *not* know if anything
>>>>>>>> has been
>>>>>>>> written about him.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Examples?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "examples"?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Unlike The Fraud, that's a bit rich keith. How about you answer my
>>>>>> questions for a change? I gave you an example of The Fraud lying
>>>>>> his fool
>>>>>> head off and you've made no "relevant" comment on it. (Mind you,
>>>>>> that was
>>>>>> better than Gumps' response). Now you want me to dig through the
>>>>>> cesspit
>>>>>> *again*? You're much like the Bumhole (Vic) Bogan keith, very keen on
>>>>>> asking questions, shithouse at answering them.
>>>>>
>>>>> A long way of say that you can't.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> so you expect alvey to remember some occasions, and dredge them up
>>>> and post here, because you don't believe him? (and me) also I know
>>>> clocky and Xeno would also confirm, and possibly even jonz could
>>>> except he's a noddy devotee now, but you don't require noddy, a
>>>> proven liar, to justify any of his claims to you? interesting...
>>>
>>> He made the assertion either he proves it or he is a proven liar.
>>>
>>
>> nonsense. not providing proof doesn't mean the claim is false, only
>> that it's unproven
>>
> He asserts that the claim is true, so, if it is unproven, he is lying.

In that case NoddyLiar, claiming he is qualified for which *no* evidence
has been provided or found anywhere, is lying.

Agreed?

On Mon, 27 Sep 2021 16:03:01 +0800, Clocky wrote:

> On 23/09/2021 3:16 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 23/09/2021 4:10 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>> On 23/09/2021 1:15 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>> On 23/09/2021 12:15 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>> On 23/09/2021 10:57 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 10:07 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>> On Thu, 23 Sep 2021 08:45:30 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 6:54 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 22 Sep 2021 22:15:21 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 21/09/2021 6:21 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Oh btw Der Der, I notice that you're still reading all my
>>>>>>>>>>> posts. lol.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Lets see how this works, I'll type it slowly so that you can
>>>>>>>>>> understand,
>>>>>>>>>> you can stick your tongue out if it helps.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 1) Little alvey makes a post.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 2) Somebody who hasn't got him plonked (E.G. jonz) replies quoting
>>>>>>>>>> little alveys post.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 3) Noddy who hasn't got that person (E.G. jonz) plonked sees
>>>>>>>>>> his post
>>>>>>>>>> including your words of wisdom
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 4) Noddy replies to that post with your quote.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> See, simple isn't it, that's the way that Usenet works.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> If you still don't understand  then either you are more stupid
>>>>>>>>>> than max
>>>>>>>>>> or willfully igorant, and that is just as bad as anything that
>>>>>>>>>> you've
>>>>>>>>>> accused noddy of being.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> lol. "willfully igorant".
>>>>>>>>> Another contender for 'Pyto of the Moth' from keith.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Anyhoo keith... everybody here (except Der Der. Ask about his
>>>>>>>>> "private
>>>>>>>>> conversation" interpretation sometime. It's a real hoot!) has a
>>>>>>>>> reasonable
>>>>>>>>> grasp of how usenet works. The flaw in your primer is once again
>>>>>>>>> that you
>>>>>>>>> are an ocassional visitor to this swamp. You see Der Der has an
>>>>>>>>> indisputable history of wanting to be so quick to spew some of
>>>>>>>>> his bile
>>>>>>>>> about that he's forgotten that he's repeatedly brayed, 'I
>>>>>>>>> *never* read
>>>>>>>>> nnnnnnnn's posts' and replied *directly* to the named Binee.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Examples?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It's also transparently obvious, to some anyway, that the
>>>>>>>>> buffoon has read
>>>>>>>>> 'invisible' posts by references he later makes. And then there's
>>>>>>>>> his
>>>>>>>>> sociopathic personality. He simply cannot *not* know if anything
>>>>>>>>> has been
>>>>>>>>> written about him.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Examples?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "examples"?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Unlike The Fraud, that's a bit rich keith. How about you answer my
>>>>>>> questions for a change? I gave you an example of The Fraud lying
>>>>>>> his fool
>>>>>>> head off and you've made no "relevant" comment on it. (Mind you,
>>>>>>> that was
>>>>>>> better than Gumps' response). Now you want me to dig through the
>>>>>>> cesspit
>>>>>>> *again*? You're much like the Bumhole (Vic) Bogan keith, very keen on
>>>>>>> asking questions, shithouse at answering them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A long way of say that you can't.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> so you expect alvey to remember some occasions, and dredge them up
>>>>> and post here, because you don't believe him? (and me) also I know
>>>>> clocky and Xeno would also confirm, and possibly even jonz could
>>>>> except he's a noddy devotee now, but you don't require noddy, a
>>>>> proven liar, to justify any of his claims to you? interesting...
>>>>
>>>> He made the assertion either he proves it or he is a proven liar.
>>>>
>>>
>>> nonsense. not providing proof doesn't mean the claim is false, only
>>> that it's unproven
>>>
>> He asserts that the claim is true, so, if it is unproven, he is lying.
>
> In that case NoddyLiar, claiming he is qualified for which *no* evidence
> has been provided or found anywhere, is lying.
>
> Agreed?

Yep, Logic is one of the many subjects that The Liars & Cowards Society
aren't very good at. In fact, the only things that they *are* any good at
are Running Away and Not Being Any Good At Anything Else.

alvey
“I'm not talking about "relative prices" which is an utterly ridiculous
argument. I'm talking about the out the door sticker price.” Fraudster,
17Jul21

On 28/09/2021 3:45 am, alvey wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Sep 2021 16:03:01 +0800, Clocky wrote:
>
>> On 23/09/2021 3:16 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 23/09/2021 4:10 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>> On 23/09/2021 1:15 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>> On 23/09/2021 12:15 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 10:57 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 10:07 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Thu, 23 Sep 2021 08:45:30 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 6:54 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 22 Sep 2021 22:15:21 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 21/09/2021 6:21 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh btw Der Der, I notice that you're still reading all my
>>>>>>>>>>>> posts. lol.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Lets see how this works, I'll type it slowly so that you can
>>>>>>>>>>> understand,
>>>>>>>>>>> you can stick your tongue out if it helps.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 1) Little alvey makes a post.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 2) Somebody who hasn't got him plonked (E.G. jonz) replies quoting
>>>>>>>>>>> little alveys post.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 3) Noddy who hasn't got that person (E.G. jonz) plonked sees
>>>>>>>>>>> his post
>>>>>>>>>>> including your words of wisdom
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 4) Noddy replies to that post with your quote.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> See, simple isn't it, that's the way that Usenet works.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> If you still don't understand  then either you are more stupid
>>>>>>>>>>> than max
>>>>>>>>>>> or willfully igorant, and that is just as bad as anything that
>>>>>>>>>>> you've
>>>>>>>>>>> accused noddy of being.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> lol. "willfully igorant".
>>>>>>>>>> Another contender for 'Pyto of the Moth' from keith.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Anyhoo keith... everybody here (except Der Der. Ask about his
>>>>>>>>>> "private
>>>>>>>>>> conversation" interpretation sometime. It's a real hoot!) has a
>>>>>>>>>> reasonable
>>>>>>>>>> grasp of how usenet works. The flaw in your primer is once again
>>>>>>>>>> that you
>>>>>>>>>> are an ocassional visitor to this swamp. You see Der Der has an
>>>>>>>>>> indisputable history of wanting to be so quick to spew some of
>>>>>>>>>> his bile
>>>>>>>>>> about that he's forgotten that he's repeatedly brayed, 'I
>>>>>>>>>> *never* read
>>>>>>>>>> nnnnnnnn's posts' and replied *directly* to the named Binee.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Examples?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It's also transparently obvious, to some anyway, that the
>>>>>>>>>> buffoon has read
>>>>>>>>>> 'invisible' posts by references he later makes. And then there's
>>>>>>>>>> his
>>>>>>>>>> sociopathic personality. He simply cannot *not* know if anything
>>>>>>>>>> has been
>>>>>>>>>> written about him.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Examples?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "examples"?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Unlike The Fraud, that's a bit rich keith. How about you answer my
>>>>>>>> questions for a change? I gave you an example of The Fraud lying
>>>>>>>> his fool
>>>>>>>> head off and you've made no "relevant" comment on it. (Mind you,
>>>>>>>> that was
>>>>>>>> better than Gumps' response). Now you want me to dig through the
>>>>>>>> cesspit
>>>>>>>> *again*? You're much like the Bumhole (Vic) Bogan keith, very keen on
>>>>>>>> asking questions, shithouse at answering them.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A long way of say that you can't.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> so you expect alvey to remember some occasions, and dredge them up
>>>>>> and post here, because you don't believe him? (and me) also I know
>>>>>> clocky and Xeno would also confirm, and possibly even jonz could
>>>>>> except he's a noddy devotee now, but you don't require noddy, a
>>>>>> proven liar, to justify any of his claims to you? interesting...
>>>>>
>>>>> He made the assertion either he proves it or he is a proven liar.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> nonsense. not providing proof doesn't mean the claim is false, only
>>>> that it's unproven
>>>>
>>> He asserts that the claim is true, so, if it is unproven, he is lying.
>>
>> In that case NoddyLiar, claiming he is qualified for which *no* evidence
>> has been provided or found anywhere, is lying.
>>
>> Agreed?
>
> Yep, Logic is one of the many subjects that The Liars & Cowards Society
> aren't very good at. In fact, the only things that they *are* any good at
> are Running Away and Not Being Any Good At Anything Else.
>
>

Evidently so.

>
> alvey
> “I'm not talking about "relative prices" which is an utterly ridiculous
> argument. I'm talking about the out the door sticker price.” Fraudster,
> 17Jul21
>

The absurdity of that comment... and disturbingly not one of his
enablers pulled him up on it.

On 27/09/2021 6:03 pm, Clocky wrote:
> On 23/09/2021 3:16 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 23/09/2021 4:10 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>> On 23/09/2021 1:15 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>> On 23/09/2021 12:15 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>> On 23/09/2021 10:57 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 10:07 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>> On Thu, 23 Sep 2021 08:45:30 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 6:54 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 22 Sep 2021 22:15:21 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 21/09/2021 6:21 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Oh btw Der Der, I notice that you're still reading all my
>>>>>>>>>>> posts. lol.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Lets see how this works, I'll type it slowly so that you can
>>>>>>>>>> understand,
>>>>>>>>>> you can stick your tongue out if it helps.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 1) Little alvey makes a post.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 2) Somebody who hasn't got him plonked (E.G. jonz) replies
>>>>>>>>>> quoting
>>>>>>>>>> little alveys post.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 3) Noddy who hasn't got that person (E.G. jonz) plonked sees
>>>>>>>>>> his post
>>>>>>>>>> including your words of wisdom
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 4) Noddy replies to that post with your quote.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> See, simple isn't it, that's the way that Usenet works.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> If you still don't understand  then either you are more stupid
>>>>>>>>>> than max
>>>>>>>>>> or willfully igorant, and that is just as bad as anything that
>>>>>>>>>> you've
>>>>>>>>>> accused noddy of being.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> lol. "willfully igorant".
>>>>>>>>> Another contender for 'Pyto of the Moth' from keith.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Anyhoo keith... everybody here (except Der Der. Ask about his
>>>>>>>>> "private
>>>>>>>>> conversation" interpretation sometime. It's a real hoot!) has a
>>>>>>>>> reasonable
>>>>>>>>> grasp of how usenet works. The flaw in your primer is once
>>>>>>>>> again that you
>>>>>>>>> are an ocassional visitor to this swamp. You see Der Der has an
>>>>>>>>> indisputable history of wanting to be so quick to spew some of
>>>>>>>>> his bile
>>>>>>>>> about that he's forgotten that he's repeatedly brayed, 'I
>>>>>>>>> *never* read
>>>>>>>>> nnnnnnnn's posts' and replied *directly* to the named Binee.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Examples?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It's also transparently obvious, to some anyway, that the
>>>>>>>>> buffoon has read
>>>>>>>>> 'invisible' posts by references he later makes. And then
>>>>>>>>> there's his
>>>>>>>>> sociopathic personality. He simply cannot *not* know if
>>>>>>>>> anything has been
>>>>>>>>> written about him.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Examples?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "examples"?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Unlike The Fraud, that's a bit rich keith. How about you answer my
>>>>>>> questions for a change? I gave you an example of The Fraud lying
>>>>>>> his fool
>>>>>>> head off and you've made no "relevant" comment on it. (Mind you,
>>>>>>> that was
>>>>>>> better than Gumps' response). Now you want me to dig through the
>>>>>>> cesspit
>>>>>>> *again*? You're much like the Bumhole (Vic) Bogan keith, very
>>>>>>> keen on
>>>>>>> asking questions, shithouse at answering them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A long way of say that you can't.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> so you expect alvey to remember some occasions, and dredge them up
>>>>> and post here, because you don't believe him? (and me) also I know
>>>>> clocky and Xeno would also confirm, and possibly even jonz could
>>>>> except he's a noddy devotee now, but you don't require noddy, a
>>>>> proven liar, to justify any of his claims to you? interesting...
>>>>
>>>> He made the assertion either he proves it or he is a proven liar.
>>>>
>>>
>>> nonsense. not providing proof doesn't mean the claim is false, only
>>> that it's unproven
>>>
>> He asserts that the claim is true, so, if it is unproven, he is lying.
>
>
> In that case NoddyLiar, claiming he is qualified for which *no* evidence
> has been provided or found anywhere, is lying.
>
> Agreed?

Whatever.

On Tue, 28 Sep 2021 16:15:17 +1000, keithr0 wrote:

> On 27/09/2021 6:03 pm, Clocky wrote:
>> On 23/09/2021 3:16 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 23/09/2021 4:10 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>> On 23/09/2021 1:15 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>> On 23/09/2021 12:15 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 10:57 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 10:07 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Thu, 23 Sep 2021 08:45:30 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 6:54 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 22 Sep 2021 22:15:21 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 21/09/2021 6:21 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh btw Der Der, I notice that you're still reading all my
>>>>>>>>>>>> posts. lol.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Lets see how this works, I'll type it slowly so that you can
>>>>>>>>>>> understand,
>>>>>>>>>>> you can stick your tongue out if it helps.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 1) Little alvey makes a post.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 2) Somebody who hasn't got him plonked (E.G. jonz) replies
>>>>>>>>>>> quoting
>>>>>>>>>>> little alveys post.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 3) Noddy who hasn't got that person (E.G. jonz) plonked sees
>>>>>>>>>>> his post
>>>>>>>>>>> including your words of wisdom
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 4) Noddy replies to that post with your quote.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> See, simple isn't it, that's the way that Usenet works.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> If you still don't understand  then either you are more stupid
>>>>>>>>>>> than max
>>>>>>>>>>> or willfully igorant, and that is just as bad as anything that
>>>>>>>>>>> you've
>>>>>>>>>>> accused noddy of being.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> lol. "willfully igorant".
>>>>>>>>>> Another contender for 'Pyto of the Moth' from keith.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Anyhoo keith... everybody here (except Der Der. Ask about his
>>>>>>>>>> "private
>>>>>>>>>> conversation" interpretation sometime. It's a real hoot!) has a
>>>>>>>>>> reasonable
>>>>>>>>>> grasp of how usenet works. The flaw in your primer is once
>>>>>>>>>> again that you
>>>>>>>>>> are an ocassional visitor to this swamp. You see Der Der has an
>>>>>>>>>> indisputable history of wanting to be so quick to spew some of
>>>>>>>>>> his bile
>>>>>>>>>> about that he's forgotten that he's repeatedly brayed, 'I
>>>>>>>>>> *never* read
>>>>>>>>>> nnnnnnnn's posts' and replied *directly* to the named Binee.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Examples?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It's also transparently obvious, to some anyway, that the
>>>>>>>>>> buffoon has read
>>>>>>>>>> 'invisible' posts by references he later makes. And then
>>>>>>>>>> there's his
>>>>>>>>>> sociopathic personality. He simply cannot *not* know if
>>>>>>>>>> anything has been
>>>>>>>>>> written about him.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Examples?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "examples"?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Unlike The Fraud, that's a bit rich keith. How about you answer my
>>>>>>>> questions for a change? I gave you an example of The Fraud lying
>>>>>>>> his fool
>>>>>>>> head off and you've made no "relevant" comment on it. (Mind you,
>>>>>>>> that was
>>>>>>>> better than Gumps' response). Now you want me to dig through the
>>>>>>>> cesspit
>>>>>>>> *again*? You're much like the Bumhole (Vic) Bogan keith, very
>>>>>>>> keen on
>>>>>>>> asking questions, shithouse at answering them.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A long way of say that you can't.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> so you expect alvey to remember some occasions, and dredge them up
>>>>>> and post here, because you don't believe him? (and me) also I know
>>>>>> clocky and Xeno would also confirm, and possibly even jonz could
>>>>>> except he's a noddy devotee now, but you don't require noddy, a
>>>>>> proven liar, to justify any of his claims to you? interesting...
>>>>>
>>>>> He made the assertion either he proves it or he is a proven liar.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> nonsense. not providing proof doesn't mean the claim is false, only
>>>> that it's unproven
>>>>
>>> He asserts that the claim is true, so, if it is unproven, he is lying.
>>
>> In that case NoddyLiar, claiming he is qualified for which *no* evidence
>> has been provided or found anywhere, is lying.
>>
>> Agreed?
>
> Whatever.

lol!

Ahhhh. "Whatever". Usenets' equivalent of the Black Knights' "I am
invincible!"

On 28/09/2021 2:15 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> On 27/09/2021 6:03 pm, Clocky wrote:
>> On 23/09/2021 3:16 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 23/09/2021 4:10 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>> On 23/09/2021 1:15 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>> On 23/09/2021 12:15 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 10:57 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 10:07 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Thu, 23 Sep 2021 08:45:30 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 6:54 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 22 Sep 2021 22:15:21 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 21/09/2021 6:21 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh btw Der Der, I notice that you're still reading all my
>>>>>>>>>>>> posts. lol.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Lets see how this works, I'll type it slowly so that you can
>>>>>>>>>>> understand,
>>>>>>>>>>> you can stick your tongue out if it helps.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 1) Little alvey makes a post.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 2) Somebody who hasn't got him plonked (E.G. jonz) replies
>>>>>>>>>>> quoting
>>>>>>>>>>> little alveys post.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 3) Noddy who hasn't got that person (E.G. jonz) plonked sees
>>>>>>>>>>> his post
>>>>>>>>>>> including your words of wisdom
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 4) Noddy replies to that post with your quote.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> See, simple isn't it, that's the way that Usenet works.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> If you still don't understand  then either you are more
>>>>>>>>>>> stupid than max
>>>>>>>>>>> or willfully igorant, and that is just as bad as anything
>>>>>>>>>>> that you've
>>>>>>>>>>> accused noddy of being.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> lol. "willfully igorant".
>>>>>>>>>> Another contender for 'Pyto of the Moth' from keith.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Anyhoo keith... everybody here (except Der Der. Ask about his
>>>>>>>>>> "private
>>>>>>>>>> conversation" interpretation sometime. It's a real hoot!) has
>>>>>>>>>> a reasonable
>>>>>>>>>> grasp of how usenet works. The flaw in your primer is once
>>>>>>>>>> again that you
>>>>>>>>>> are an ocassional visitor to this swamp. You see Der Der has an
>>>>>>>>>> indisputable history of wanting to be so quick to spew some of
>>>>>>>>>> his bile
>>>>>>>>>> about that he's forgotten that he's repeatedly brayed, 'I
>>>>>>>>>> *never* read
>>>>>>>>>> nnnnnnnn's posts' and replied *directly* to the named Binee.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Examples?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It's also transparently obvious, to some anyway, that the
>>>>>>>>>> buffoon has read
>>>>>>>>>> 'invisible' posts by references he later makes. And then
>>>>>>>>>> there's his
>>>>>>>>>> sociopathic personality. He simply cannot *not* know if
>>>>>>>>>> anything has been
>>>>>>>>>> written about him.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Examples?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "examples"?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Unlike The Fraud, that's a bit rich keith. How about you answer my
>>>>>>>> questions for a change? I gave you an example of The Fraud lying
>>>>>>>> his fool
>>>>>>>> head off and you've made no "relevant" comment on it. (Mind you,
>>>>>>>> that was
>>>>>>>> better than Gumps' response). Now you want me to dig through the
>>>>>>>> cesspit
>>>>>>>> *again*? You're much like the Bumhole (Vic) Bogan keith, very
>>>>>>>> keen on
>>>>>>>> asking questions, shithouse at answering them.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A long way of say that you can't.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> so you expect alvey to remember some occasions, and dredge them up
>>>>>> and post here, because you don't believe him? (and me) also I know
>>>>>> clocky and Xeno would also confirm, and possibly even jonz could
>>>>>> except he's a noddy devotee now, but you don't require noddy, a
>>>>>> proven liar, to justify any of his claims to you? interesting...
>>>>>
>>>>> He made the assertion either he proves it or he is a proven liar.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> nonsense. not providing proof doesn't mean the claim is false, only
>>>> that it's unproven
>>>>
>>> He asserts that the claim is true, so, if it is unproven, he is lying.
>>
>>
>> In that case NoddyLiar, claiming he is qualified for which *no*
>> evidence has been provided or found anywhere, is lying.
>>
>> Agreed?
>
> Whatever.

"yes" is your only option Keith :-)

On 28/09/2021 5:43 pm, Clocky wrote:
> On 28/09/2021 2:15 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 27/09/2021 6:03 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>> On 23/09/2021 3:16 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>> On 23/09/2021 4:10 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>> On 23/09/2021 1:15 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 12:15 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 10:57 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 10:07 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 23 Sep 2021 08:45:30 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 6:54 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 22 Sep 2021 22:15:21 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 21/09/2021 6:21 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh btw Der Der, I notice that you're still reading all my
>>>>>>>>>>>>> posts. lol.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Lets see how this works, I'll type it slowly so that you
>>>>>>>>>>>> can understand,
>>>>>>>>>>>> you can stick your tongue out if it helps.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 1) Little alvey makes a post.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) Somebody who hasn't got him plonked (E.G. jonz) replies
>>>>>>>>>>>> quoting
>>>>>>>>>>>> little alveys post.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 3) Noddy who hasn't got that person (E.G. jonz) plonked
>>>>>>>>>>>> sees his post
>>>>>>>>>>>> including your words of wisdom
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 4) Noddy replies to that post with your quote.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> See, simple isn't it, that's the way that Usenet works.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> If you still don't understand  then either you are more
>>>>>>>>>>>> stupid than max
>>>>>>>>>>>> or willfully igorant, and that is just as bad as anything
>>>>>>>>>>>> that you've
>>>>>>>>>>>> accused noddy of being.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> lol. "willfully igorant".
>>>>>>>>>>> Another contender for 'Pyto of the Moth' from keith.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Anyhoo keith... everybody here (except Der Der. Ask about
>>>>>>>>>>> his "private
>>>>>>>>>>> conversation" interpretation sometime. It's a real hoot!)
>>>>>>>>>>> has a reasonable
>>>>>>>>>>> grasp of how usenet works. The flaw in your primer is once
>>>>>>>>>>> again that you
>>>>>>>>>>> are an ocassional visitor to this swamp. You see Der Der has an
>>>>>>>>>>> indisputable history of wanting to be so quick to spew some
>>>>>>>>>>> of his bile
>>>>>>>>>>> about that he's forgotten that he's repeatedly brayed, 'I
>>>>>>>>>>> *never* read
>>>>>>>>>>> nnnnnnnn's posts' and replied *directly* to the named Binee.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Examples?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It's also transparently obvious, to some anyway, that the
>>>>>>>>>>> buffoon has read
>>>>>>>>>>> 'invisible' posts by references he later makes. And then
>>>>>>>>>>> there's his
>>>>>>>>>>> sociopathic personality. He simply cannot *not* know if
>>>>>>>>>>> anything has been
>>>>>>>>>>> written about him.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Examples?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "examples"?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Unlike The Fraud, that's a bit rich keith. How about you
>>>>>>>>> answer my
>>>>>>>>> questions for a change? I gave you an example of The Fraud
>>>>>>>>> lying his fool
>>>>>>>>> head off and you've made no "relevant" comment on it. (Mind
>>>>>>>>> you, that was
>>>>>>>>> better than Gumps' response). Now you want me to dig through
>>>>>>>>> the cesspit
>>>>>>>>> *again*? You're much like the Bumhole (Vic) Bogan keith, very
>>>>>>>>> keen on
>>>>>>>>> asking questions, shithouse at answering them.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> A long way of say that you can't.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> so you expect alvey to remember some occasions, and dredge them
>>>>>>> up and post here, because you don't believe him? (and me) also I
>>>>>>> know clocky and Xeno would also confirm, and possibly even jonz
>>>>>>> could except he's a noddy devotee now, but you don't require
>>>>>>> noddy, a proven liar, to justify any of his claims to you?
>>>>>>> interesting...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> He made the assertion either he proves it or he is a proven liar.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> nonsense. not providing proof doesn't mean the claim is false,
>>>>> only that it's unproven
>>>>>
>>>> He asserts that the claim is true, so, if it is unproven, he is lying.
>>>
>>>
>>> In that case NoddyLiar, claiming he is qualified for which *no*
>>> evidence has been provided or found anywhere, is lying.
>>>
>>> Agreed?
>>
>> Whatever.
>
>
> "yes" is your only option Keith :-)
>

at least he didn't run away, he only half ran away  :)

--
"A mans got to know his limitations"
- clint Eastwood as Dirty Harry

On 28/09/2021 4:15 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> On 27/09/2021 6:03 pm, Clocky wrote:

>>
>> In that case NoddyLiar, claiming he is qualified for which *no*
>> evidence has been provided or found anywhere, is lying.
>>
>> Agreed?
>
> Whatever.

Just say "Yes" Keith. It's not like anyone actually cares :)

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

On 28/09/2021 5:43 pm, Clocky wrote:
> On 28/09/2021 2:15 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 27/09/2021 6:03 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>> On 23/09/2021 3:16 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>> On 23/09/2021 4:10 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>> On 23/09/2021 1:15 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 12:15 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 10:57 am, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 10:07 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 23 Sep 2021 08:45:30 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 23/09/2021 6:54 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 22 Sep 2021 22:15:21 +1000, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 21/09/2021 6:21 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh btw Der Der, I notice that you're still reading all my
>>>>>>>>>>>>> posts. lol.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Lets see how this works, I'll type it slowly so that you can
>>>>>>>>>>>> understand,
>>>>>>>>>>>> you can stick your tongue out if it helps.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 1) Little alvey makes a post.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) Somebody who hasn't got him plonked (E.G. jonz) replies
>>>>>>>>>>>> quoting
>>>>>>>>>>>> little alveys post.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 3) Noddy who hasn't got that person (E.G. jonz) plonked sees
>>>>>>>>>>>> his post
>>>>>>>>>>>> including your words of wisdom
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 4) Noddy replies to that post with your quote.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> See, simple isn't it, that's the way that Usenet works.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> If you still don't understand  then either you are more
>>>>>>>>>>>> stupid than max
>>>>>>>>>>>> or willfully igorant, and that is just as bad as anything
>>>>>>>>>>>> that you've
>>>>>>>>>>>> accused noddy of being.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> lol. "willfully igorant".
>>>>>>>>>>> Another contender for 'Pyto of the Moth' from keith.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Anyhoo keith... everybody here (except Der Der. Ask about his
>>>>>>>>>>> "private
>>>>>>>>>>> conversation" interpretation sometime. It's a real hoot!) has
>>>>>>>>>>> a reasonable
>>>>>>>>>>> grasp of how usenet works. The flaw in your primer is once
>>>>>>>>>>> again that you
>>>>>>>>>>> are an ocassional visitor to this swamp. You see Der Der has an
>>>>>>>>>>> indisputable history of wanting to be so quick to spew some
>>>>>>>>>>> of his bile
>>>>>>>>>>> about that he's forgotten that he's repeatedly brayed, 'I
>>>>>>>>>>> *never* read
>>>>>>>>>>> nnnnnnnn's posts' and replied *directly* to the named Binee.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Examples?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It's also transparently obvious, to some anyway, that the
>>>>>>>>>>> buffoon has read
>>>>>>>>>>> 'invisible' posts by references he later makes. And then
>>>>>>>>>>> there's his
>>>>>>>>>>> sociopathic personality. He simply cannot *not* know if
>>>>>>>>>>> anything has been
>>>>>>>>>>> written about him.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Examples?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "examples"?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Unlike The Fraud, that's a bit rich keith. How about you answer my
>>>>>>>>> questions for a change? I gave you an example of The Fraud
>>>>>>>>> lying his fool
>>>>>>>>> head off and you've made no "relevant" comment on it. (Mind
>>>>>>>>> you, that was
>>>>>>>>> better than Gumps' response). Now you want me to dig through
>>>>>>>>> the cesspit
>>>>>>>>> *again*? You're much like the Bumhole (Vic) Bogan keith, very
>>>>>>>>> keen on
>>>>>>>>> asking questions, shithouse at answering them.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> A long way of say that you can't.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> so you expect alvey to remember some occasions, and dredge them
>>>>>>> up and post here, because you don't believe him? (and me) also I
>>>>>>> know clocky and Xeno would also confirm, and possibly even jonz
>>>>>>> could except he's a noddy devotee now, but you don't require
>>>>>>> noddy, a proven liar, to justify any of his claims to you?
>>>>>>> interesting...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> He made the assertion either he proves it or he is a proven liar.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> nonsense. not providing proof doesn't mean the claim is false, only
>>>>> that it's unproven
>>>>>
>>>> He asserts that the claim is true, so, if it is unproven, he is lying.
>>>
>>>
>>> In that case NoddyLiar, claiming he is qualified for which *no*
>>> evidence has been provided or found anywhere, is lying.
>>>
>>> Agreed?
>>
>> Whatever.
>
>
> "yes" is your only option Keith :-)
>
I choose my own options, thank you.

On 28/09/2021 6:40 pm, alveys sockpuppet wrote:

> at least he didn't run away, he only half ran away  :)

Yawn, if that's the best that you can do, it's better if you don't