On 3/10/2021 6:42 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> On 3/10/2021 3:57 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>> On 3/10/2021 2:38 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 3/10/2021 12:09 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>> On 3/10/2021 12:46 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>> On 3/10/2021 10:40 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>> On 2/10/2021 11:50 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2/10/21 11:13 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ROTFL :)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Isn't this absolutely fucking pathetic? That this imbecilic
>>>>>>>> cunt *still* tries to maintain this fairy tale as being real
>>>>>>>> even though there is not a *single* person in this group who
>>>>>>>> believes it?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Perhaps we should ask Jerky Birko to carry out another
>>>>>>>> "investigation", as he never reached a finding in his original
>>>>>>>> one :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Odd, isn't it, how you only grow some balls and start posting
>>>>>>> when you have *backup*. Amongst all your failings, you're just a
>>>>>>> rank coward.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> when enough troops have assembled to defend him he crawls out of
>>>>>> Coward Castle to rant and rave  :)
>>>>>>
>>>>> Le petit félix jeta un coup d'œil sous le rideau et grinca « Moi
>>>>> aussi »
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> mon Dieu! keefy knows how to use google translate. wonders will
>>>> never cease..
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Actually I can speak some french, but if you like Google translate,
>>> try this
>>>
>>> Der kleine Felix schaute unter dem Vorhang hervor und quietschte "Me
>>> too"
>>
>>
>> so you're German? or just trying to appear smart
>>
> 小さなフェリックスがカーテンの下から覗き、「私も」と鳴いた
>

so you're just being infantile and stupid then

--
"A mans got to know his limitations"
- clint Eastwood as Dirty Harry

On 3/10/2021 3:55 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 3/10/2021 2:24 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>> On 3/10/2021 12:13 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>> On 3/10/2021 12:39 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>> On 3/10/2021 10:47 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>> On 3/10/2021 6:41 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>> On Sat, 2 Oct 2021 18:26:50 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2/10/2021 6:11 pm, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sat, 2 Oct 2021 17:41:17 +1000, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> He doesn't seem to mention Krypsis much these days, does he?
>>>>>>>> And you don't mention your fictitious achievements at all
>>>>>>>> Fraudster.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And acrimonious alwee squeaks but what about him yet again.
>>>>>> The pen of my aunt is in the garden.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "La plume de ma tante". I suspect  your reply is beyond his ken.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> And up popped pitiful Pete with nothing to say as usual.
>>>>
>>>> mon tailleur est riche
>>>>
>>>
>>> you need to up your meds Douggie ol'son..
>>>
>>>
>> Oh oh, I've been bitchslapped with a damp feather. You suspected
>> Alwee's comment was beyond my ken, I responded with the perfect
>> response to your 'La plume...' It basically is a joke french saying
>> that is used when you don't know what to say in English. Which is
>> fairly accurate in this situation for you. You only seem to have the
>> guts to say anything when you know you have the backing of the flc,
>> otherwise your a coward of the highest order.
>>
>>
>
> look whose talking. when did you last serve your country?
>
>
Completely irrelevant as usual. However, to answer your question, whilst
I haven't actively served I have supported our forces as a civilian
contractor and held the relevant clearances. Still putting your foot in
your mouth. Have you actively served? I also have family who actively
served including one who is at the moment.

On 3/10/2021 7:23 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
> On 3/10/2021 3:55 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>> On 3/10/2021 2:24 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>> On 3/10/2021 12:13 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>> On 3/10/2021 12:39 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>> On 3/10/2021 10:47 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>> On 3/10/2021 6:41 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sat, 2 Oct 2021 18:26:50 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2/10/2021 6:11 pm, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 2 Oct 2021 17:41:17 +1000, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> He doesn't seem to mention Krypsis much these days, does he?
>>>>>>>>> And you don't mention your fictitious achievements at all
>>>>>>>>> Fraudster.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And acrimonious alwee squeaks but what about him yet again.
>>>>>>> The pen of my aunt is in the garden.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "La plume de ma tante". I suspect  your reply is beyond his ken.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> And up popped pitiful Pete with nothing to say as usual.
>>>>>
>>>>> mon tailleur est riche
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> you need to up your meds Douggie ol'son..
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Oh oh, I've been bitchslapped with a damp feather. You suspected
>>> Alwee's comment was beyond my ken, I responded with the perfect
>>> response to your 'La plume...' It basically is a joke french saying
>>> that is used when you don't know what to say in English. Which is
>>> fairly accurate in this situation for you. You only seem to have the
>>> guts to say anything when you know you have the backing of the flc,
>>> otherwise your a coward of the highest order.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> look whose talking. when did you last serve your country?
>>
>>
> Completely irrelevant as usual. However, to answer your question,
> whilst I haven't actively served I have supported our forces as a
> civilian contractor and held the relevant clearances. Still putting
> your foot in your mouth. Have you actively served? I also have family
> who actively served including one who is at the moment.

it's a bit rich calling someone 'a coward of the highest order' when
it's your Lord and Master who hides behind a killfile.

--
"A mans got to know his limitations"
- clint Eastwood as Dirty Harry

On 3/10/2021 7:04 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 3/10/2021 7:23 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>> On 3/10/2021 3:55 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>> On 3/10/2021 2:24 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>> On 3/10/2021 12:13 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>> On 3/10/2021 12:39 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>> On 3/10/2021 10:47 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>> On 3/10/2021 6:41 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sat, 2 Oct 2021 18:26:50 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 2/10/2021 6:11 pm, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 2 Oct 2021 17:41:17 +1000, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> He doesn't seem to mention Krypsis much these days, does he?
>>>>>>>>>> And you don't mention your fictitious achievements at all
>>>>>>>>>> Fraudster.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And acrimonious alwee squeaks but what about him yet again.
>>>>>>>> The pen of my aunt is in the garden.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "La plume de ma tante". I suspect  your reply is beyond his ken.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And up popped pitiful Pete with nothing to say as usual.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> mon tailleur est riche
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> you need to up your meds Douggie ol'son..
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Oh oh, I've been bitchslapped with a damp feather. You suspected
>>>> Alwee's comment was beyond my ken, I responded with the perfect
>>>> response to your 'La plume...' It basically is a joke french saying
>>>> that is used when you don't know what to say in English. Which is
>>>> fairly accurate in this situation for you. You only seem to have the
>>>> guts to say anything when you know you have the backing of the flc,
>>>> otherwise your a coward of the highest order.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> look whose talking. when did you last serve your country?
>>>
>>>
>> Completely irrelevant as usual. However, to answer your question,
>> whilst I haven't actively served I have supported our forces as a
>> civilian contractor and held the relevant clearances. Still putting
>> your foot in your mouth. Have you actively served? I also have family
>> who actively served including one who is at the moment.
>
>
> it's a bit rich calling someone 'a coward of the highest order' when
> it's your Lord and Master who hides behind a killfile.
>
>
Subject change noted.

On 3/10/2021 5:56 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 3/10/2021 6:42 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 3/10/2021 3:57 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>> On 3/10/2021 2:38 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>> On 3/10/2021 12:09 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>> On 3/10/2021 12:46 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>> On 3/10/2021 10:40 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2/10/2021 11:50 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2/10/21 11:13 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ROTFL :)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Isn't this absolutely fucking pathetic? That this imbecilic
>>>>>>>>> cunt *still* tries to maintain this fairy tale as being real
>>>>>>>>> even though there is not a *single* person in this group who
>>>>>>>>> believes it?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Perhaps we should ask Jerky Birko to carry out another
>>>>>>>>> "investigation", as he never reached a finding in his original
>>>>>>>>> one :)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Odd, isn't it, how you only grow some balls and start posting
>>>>>>>> when you have *backup*. Amongst all your failings, you're just a
>>>>>>>> rank coward.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> when enough troops have assembled to defend him he crawls out of
>>>>>>> Coward Castle to rant and rave  :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Le petit félix jeta un coup d'œil sous le rideau et grinca « Moi
>>>>>> aussi »
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> mon Dieu! keefy knows how to use google translate. wonders will
>>>>> never cease..
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Actually I can speak some french, but if you like Google translate,
>>>> try this
>>>>
>>>> Der kleine Felix schaute unter dem Vorhang hervor und quietschte "Me
>>>> too"
>>>
>>>
>>> so you're German? or just trying to appear smart
>>>
>> 小さなフェリックスがカーテンの下から覗き、「私も」と鳴いた
>>
>
> so you're just being infantile and stupid then
>
فيليكس الصغير اختلس النظر من تحت الستار وصرير "أنا أيضا"

On 3/10/2021 7:04 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 3/10/2021 7:23 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>> On 3/10/2021 3:55 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>> On 3/10/2021 2:24 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>> On 3/10/2021 12:13 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>> On 3/10/2021 12:39 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>> On 3/10/2021 10:47 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>> On 3/10/2021 6:41 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sat, 2 Oct 2021 18:26:50 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 2/10/2021 6:11 pm, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 2 Oct 2021 17:41:17 +1000, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> He doesn't seem to mention Krypsis much these days, does he?
>>>>>>>>>> And you don't mention your fictitious achievements at all
>>>>>>>>>> Fraudster.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And acrimonious alwee squeaks but what about him yet again.
>>>>>>>> The pen of my aunt is in the garden.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "La plume de ma tante". I suspect  your reply is beyond his ken.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And up popped pitiful Pete with nothing to say as usual.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> mon tailleur est riche
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> you need to up your meds Douggie ol'son..
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Oh oh, I've been bitchslapped with a damp feather. You suspected
>>>> Alwee's comment was beyond my ken, I responded with the perfect
>>>> response to your 'La plume...' It basically is a joke french saying
>>>> that is used when you don't know what to say in English. Which is
>>>> fairly accurate in this situation for you. You only seem to have the
>>>> guts to say anything when you know you have the backing of the flc,
>>>> otherwise your a coward of the highest order.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> look whose talking. when did you last serve your country?
>>>
>>>
>> Completely irrelevant as usual. However, to answer your question,
>> whilst I haven't actively served I have supported our forces as a
>> civilian contractor and held the relevant clearances. Still putting
>> your foot in your mouth. Have you actively served? I also have family
>> who actively served including one who is at the moment.
>
>
> it's a bit rich calling someone 'a coward of the highest order' when
> it's your Lord and Master who hides behind a killfile.
>
>
He isn't my Lord and Master. Never has been, never will be. It's his
decision to run a killfile. So what. You're the one who whimpers and
simpers when the going gets too tough.

On 3/10/2021 9:38 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
> On 3/10/2021 7:04 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>> On 3/10/2021 7:23 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>> On 3/10/2021 3:55 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>> On 3/10/2021 2:24 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>> On 3/10/2021 12:13 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>> On 3/10/2021 12:39 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>>> On 3/10/2021 10:47 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 3/10/2021 6:41 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 2 Oct 2021 18:26:50 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 2/10/2021 6:11 pm, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 2 Oct 2021 17:41:17 +1000, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> He doesn't seem to mention Krypsis much these days, does he?
>>>>>>>>>>> And you don't mention your fictitious achievements at all
>>>>>>>>>>> Fraudster.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> And acrimonious alwee squeaks but what about him yet again.
>>>>>>>>> The pen of my aunt is in the garden.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "La plume de ma tante". I suspect  your reply is beyond his ken.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And up popped pitiful Pete with nothing to say as usual.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> mon tailleur est riche
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> you need to up your meds Douggie ol'son..
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Oh oh, I've been bitchslapped with a damp feather. You suspected
>>>>> Alwee's comment was beyond my ken, I responded with the perfect
>>>>> response to your 'La plume...' It basically is a joke french
>>>>> saying that is used when you don't know what to say in English.
>>>>> Which is fairly accurate in this situation for you. You only seem
>>>>> to have the guts to say anything when you know you have the
>>>>> backing of the flc, otherwise your a coward of the highest order.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> look whose talking. when did you last serve your country?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Completely irrelevant as usual. However, to answer your question,
>>> whilst I haven't actively served I have supported our forces as a
>>> civilian contractor and held the relevant clearances. Still putting
>>> your foot in your mouth. Have you actively served? I also have
>>> family who actively served including one who is at the moment.
>>
>>
>> it's a bit rich calling someone 'a coward of the highest order' when
>> it's your Lord and Master who hides behind a killfile.
>>
>>
> He isn't my Lord and Master. Never has been, never will be. It's his
> decision to run a killfile. So what. You're the one who whimpers and
> simpers when the going gets too tough.
>

you like making these accusations don't you. long on rhetoric, short on
fact. anyhoo, enough of you, fuck off.

--
"A mans got to know his limitations"
- clint Eastwood as Dirty Harry

On 3/10/2021 9:42 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 3/10/2021 9:38 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>> On 3/10/2021 7:04 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>> On 3/10/2021 7:23 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>> On 3/10/2021 3:55 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>> On 3/10/2021 2:24 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>> On 3/10/2021 12:13 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>> On 3/10/2021 12:39 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 3/10/2021 10:47 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 3/10/2021 6:41 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 2 Oct 2021 18:26:50 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/10/2021 6:11 pm, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 2 Oct 2021 17:41:17 +1000, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> He doesn't seem to mention Krypsis much these days, does he?
>>>>>>>>>>>> And you don't mention your fictitious achievements at all
>>>>>>>>>>>> Fraudster.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> And acrimonious alwee squeaks but what about him yet again.
>>>>>>>>>> The pen of my aunt is in the garden.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "La plume de ma tante". I suspect  your reply is beyond his ken.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And up popped pitiful Pete with nothing to say as usual.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> mon tailleur est riche
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> you need to up your meds Douggie ol'son..
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Oh oh, I've been bitchslapped with a damp feather. You suspected
>>>>>> Alwee's comment was beyond my ken, I responded with the perfect
>>>>>> response to your 'La plume...' It basically is a joke french
>>>>>> saying that is used when you don't know what to say in English.
>>>>>> Which is fairly accurate in this situation for you. You only seem
>>>>>> to have the guts to say anything when you know you have the
>>>>>> backing of the flc, otherwise your a coward of the highest order.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> look whose talking. when did you last serve your country?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Completely irrelevant as usual. However, to answer your question,
>>>> whilst I haven't actively served I have supported our forces as a
>>>> civilian contractor and held the relevant clearances. Still putting
>>>> your foot in your mouth. Have you actively served? I also have
>>>> family who actively served including one who is at the moment.
>>>
>>>
>>> it's a bit rich calling someone 'a coward of the highest order' when
>>> it's your Lord and Master who hides behind a killfile.
>>>
>>>
>> He isn't my Lord and Master. Never has been, never will be. It's his
>> decision to run a killfile. So what. You're the one who whimpers and
>> simpers when the going gets too tough.
>>
>
> you like making these accusations don't you. long on rhetoric, short on
> fact. anyhoo, enough of you, fuck off.
>
>
So let's see now, Felix whimpers and simpers then says fuck off. Doesn't
answer whether he actively served. Guess the going got too tough for
him. Perhaps we should call him precious pete... Poor little petal.

On 3/10/2021 9:38 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
> On 3/10/2021 7:04 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:

>> it's a bit rich calling someone 'a coward of the highest order' when
>> it's your Lord and Master who hides behind a killfile.
>>
>>
> He isn't my Lord and Master. Never has been, never will be. It's his
> decision to run a killfile. So what. You're the one who whimpers and
> simpers when the going gets too tough.

Isn't this just typical Felix? Whinges when you talk to him, and whinges
when you plonk him. There's no happy middle ground for this idiot, but
that seems to be okay as long as he can whinge.

And you're absolutely spot on there Grumps. The person who has the
*biggest* history of running away crying like the Victim he makes
himself out to be is none other than our resident little "me tooer".

Jeez. Imagine how he's carry on if you did something *really* nasty like
called him a "Pedophile" or something..... :)

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

On 3/10/2021 1:03 pm, jonz wrote:
> On 10/3/2021 6:41 AM, alvey wrote:
>> On Sat, 2 Oct 2021 18:26:50 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>
>>> On 2/10/2021 6:11 pm, alvey wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 2 Oct 2021 17:41:17 +1000, Noddy wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> He doesn't seem to mention Krypsis much these days, does he?
>>>> And you don't mention your fictitious achievements at all Fraudster.
>>>>
>>> And acrimonious alwee squeaks but what about him yet again.
>> The pen of my aunt is in the garden.
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>  Alvira casts herself as the protagonist, however, she is more of an
> annoying mossie!. Pfffftttt.

Soap box screaming attention whore. That's it. I'll bet he's exactly the
same in any other group the fucking moron posts in, and I'll *also* bet
he's just as well liked in those as he is here.

It'll be everyone else's fault though. Not his :)

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

On 3/10/2021 12:24 pm, jonz wrote:
> On 10/3/2021 7:25 AM, alvey wrote:

>>>> Perhaps we should ask Jerky Birko to carry out another "investigation",
>>>> as he never reached a finding in his original one :)
>>> Odd, isn't it, how you only grow some balls and start posting when you
>>> have *backup*. Amongst all your failings, you're just a rank coward.
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> I must admit, it took moi some time to realise just how much of a
> bullshit artist you are.

It took you a while to catch on. Everyone else knew within a day or two :)

> However amends have been made.

Your relationship with Clasener is your business, but as far as I'm
aware you're the only regular in this group who has met the bloke in
person, and your opinion of him seemed to change quite dramatically not
long after that.

Now, I don't know what you discovered during that meeting, but you don't
need to be a Rhodes Scholar to conclude that he wasn't who you thought
him to be and it left a somewhat bitter taste in your mouth.

>    You are xenokryp..( For a long time now) I notice you have *never*
> queried my use of that name for you?.. Apparently you accept the truth
> of the moniker!.

The bloke is fucking delusional, and I dare say you discovered that for
yourself. I think his grasp on reality is *so* fucked up he actually
believes the crap he spurts out to be true, and it's interesting to note
that it's only the truly clueless morons around here like Felix and
Alvey who swallow it. If you ask me, I don't think Clocky believes a
word of his shit and just goes along with it for shits and giggles as
he's not that stupid :)

Still, have a read of this to remind yourself of what a story telling
unicorn rider this fuckatrd is. This is the long winded load of shit he
wrote while he was being "investigated" about his links to "Krypsis" and
his continual claim that he and Krypsis are/were different people.

He wrote this on the 16th of February 2015 in a thread called "Clocky",
and it's the greatest load of shit anyone's ever posted here.

Quoted here in full and verbatim. Make note of the attention to
irrelevant detail in an attempt to inject credibility. Enjoy :)

> Time to come clean...
>
> Sprintless was close to the mark but he's been skewed off a little. I
> have known Krypsis since 87. I got to know him and his Vietnamese wife
> through a Thai friend of my wife. Her name is Visaka and she married a
> Vietnamese bloke by the name of Minh Nguyen. I first met Krypsis at the
> wedding reception and later at Minh's house at 21 Sunnyside Avenue in
> Nunawading not very far from our home. At that same event I also met a
> Chinese bloke by the name of Chia who was a mechanical engineer at the
> time but is now in IT with the Vic Education Department. Krypsis speaks
> fluent Vietnamese.
>
> Let me clear up a few details about Krypsis. He has 3 degrees; Batchelor
> of Arts, BEd and he has a Masters in Ed Admin. It was Krypsis who told
> me to do a BEd in curriculum design when my career path in Educational
> Technology vanished just after I graduated with it in 1988. I studied
> for my BEd in 91-92 and graduated in 93. That degree was handy over the
> next few years as the college was involved in developing some
> interesting curriculum stuff, especially the automotive competency
> standards, but even that disappeared when the two people pushing it
> decided to leave and set up their own consultancy. That was the end of
> in-house curriculum development and, around 2000, the college bought in
> prepackaged curriculum material, mostly on CD. Krypsis gave me a lot of
> curriculum development books back in 91, many of which I still retain to
> this day.
>
> Krypsis himself is a Victorian born and bred as far as I know. He has
> relatives all over Victoria and in southern NSW. He also has at least
> one relative in Hobart. He told me he had a brother who owned a fishing
> boat and operated out of Hobart. I don't know if he is still there as
> his name no longer comes up in the phone listings. The only person, who
> may be relative, in Tasmania with his surname now is up the NW of Tas.
> at Burnie.
> Krypsis worked at the Department of Immigration in Melbourne. He spent
> time setting up the new offices in Launceston. He told me that after I
> mentioned that I initiated my wife's immigration process at Launceston.
> The new offices were in the same building as the Library. I submitted
> the application in May 80 and the offices were brand new then. I moved
> to Melbourne midway through the process but that didn't cause me any
> hassles.
> In 1990 my wife wanted her niece to migrate to Australia. Krypsis helped
> us out with that process - two weeks from start to the visa being
> granted. Normally it was a year at best, 2 years minimum these days. It
> helped that the girl's father was a senior government official in
> Thailand, since deceased. Krypsis has helped Minh bring out from refugee
> camps in Malaysia 3 of his brothers as well as his father and mother
> from Vietnam.
> When Krypsis found out I had been tutoring a friend of my wife's in her
> Masters, he got me to take over a couple that he had been working with.
> Both were PhD students. Jacqui, who I have mentioned before, was one of
> them. Both Jacqui and the other didn't need a lot of help. My current
> PhD student is the same one who did the Masters. She is now a lecturer
> at RMIT and is doing her PhD there as well. She needs a lot more help
> with English. She has no connection with Krypsis.
>
>
>>
>> You have posted using your real name in some pretty obscure groups and
>
> Mostly crossposts I think you will find or sidetracked by crossposts and
> looked over in another group, I still do that now.. I was never too
> fussy about removing crossposted groups. Even now I usually don't
> bother. I notice a lot here are the same. As myself, I posted in one
> group primarily up until 2003. You know which one that is.. You also
> know why I stopped posting there.
>
>> forums before you stopped using your real name. Krypsis and or Xeno have
>> also usually ended up posting to the same groups but never at the same time.
>
> Between 2003 and 2007 I did not post anywhere. I set up the xeno account
> around 2007. Krypsis wanted me to get back into usenet. At the time I
> wasn't real interested. I doubt I have been a regular poster up until
> about a year and a half back as xeno.
>>
>> How do you explain that?
>>
> A few other points I will make. The reason I have a MacPro is because
> Krypsis convinced me to get it. I had a G5 PowerMac that was no longer
> getting OS updates from about OSX4. Krypsis had bought an ex-lease 3 or
> 4 year old MacPro server very cheaply. Chia told me his school had some
> servers and classroom iMacs coming off lease. Normally the schools
> bundle the lease computers up and send them off to Sydney where they get
> auctioned. Staff members could pay the lease residual and get the
> computer. Some of the iMacs were PowerPC versions so no use to me. I was
> warned off early Intel iMacs by Krypsis who said they had major issues.
> One of the servers was a dual processor Intel machine. That was very
> interesting to me. It cost me a mere $900 to pay out the lease residual.
> It needed more RAM to use as a Workstation so I followed Krypsis lead
> and bumped it up to 8 Gig with an EBay purchase. Krypsis bought new hard
> drives for his but I swapped out the four 2 terabyte drives from my main
> PC, the one I am using now, and swapped a couple of smaller ones back
> in. The only thing my MacPro lacks is a decent video card. It had a
> server video card in it and it wasn't much good for general computer
> work. It died so I bought another on EBay but it has also died. A new
> and decent replacement from Apple starts at $700 which is not much short
> of what I paid for the MacPro in the first place so I am keeping my eyes
> on EBay for one to turn up a bit cheaper. The MacPro is out of action at
> the moment.
>
> As for thermoquads, before I started my teacher training, I was working
> at the PWD garage in Fitzroy where we worked on the Vic Govt. fleet
> vehicles at Parliament Place. That included all the limos. There were a
> lot of Ford V8s in the fleet and we attended special courses at the
> Police Garage, also in Fitzroy. They had a lot of V8s. One of the
> courses I attended was on thermoquads as the management saw we were
> having issues in setting up those carbs. The bloke running the courses
> was Laurie Dodd, the Ford technical trainer and he was a mate of
> Krypsis. I was to meet up with Laurie many times over the years until he
> retired and that's where I got much of my Ford RT material from. I don't
> know what the tie up between Krypsis and Laurie Dodd was but, since they
> were of a similar age, it might have been in racing because Krypsis also
> had a tie up to Richmond TAFE through Bob D, a curriculum developer. Bob
> has in the past been heavily involved in team racing as pit crew.
> Krypsis also knows Garry L, the Richmond TAFE resident Falcon V8 nutter.
>
> In general, Krypsis and I discussed a lot of things in those times we
> would meet up, cars and computers figured highly. Mostly we would meet
> up at Minh's place or he would come to my home. I've only ever been to
> his home once in 1990.
>
> In reference to this;
>
> > 1: Both from the same ethnic background
>
> Krypsis surname actually comes up as Nordic. He has no foreign accent
> that I could detect. My ethnic background is Dutch (can be proven) but
> there is some English, possibly Irish on my fathers side. That is what
> I've been told by my father but I can't prove that one way or the other.
>
> > 2: Both lived in Tasmania
>
> I was born there and did my apprenticeship there. Krypsis was born in
> Victoria and worked for a brief time in Launceston. I don't think he
> lived there in the sense of moving his family there. His wife had a job
> in Victoria and it wouldn't have been worthwhile uprooting everything
> for a short stint in launceston.
>
> > 3: Same/similar age
>
> Different ages. I am 62 (proven)
>
> > 4: Both moved from Tas
>
> As far as I know, Krypsis has lived in Victoria all his life. I know he
> has done a lot of traveling to Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos and Thailand. He
> told me he met his wife on one of his many trips to Vietnam. She would
> be a bit older than me.
>
> > and now claim to live within shouting distance from each other
> > in northern NSW.
>
> To my knowledge, Krypsis is no where near to where I am. I haven't heard
> from him since I left Melbourne 3 years ago. He hasn't responded to
> emails last year either. He knew I was moving here. He would have liked
> to move up here, He told me that himself. There is no way in hell it
> would happen. He has kids and grandkids in Melbourne and, at his age,
> such a move is problematic.
> I have no such links to Melbourne. I have no relatives in Victoria that
> I am aware of. My wife has just one, the niece she brought out in 1990.
> They are no longer on speaking terms and it has been like that for a
> long time now.
> I will note that a lot of people were surprised when I moved north. Some
> of my work colleagues thought I was rusted on to Melbourne and, if it
> weren't for my asthma, I might still be there today. Since coming here
> three years ago, I haven't had any asthma attacks so it's all good.
>
> > 5: Post at much the same times
>
> I post at any time of the day or night. Retirement allows me to do that.
> I post any time until about 12:30am as a rule, then I am up by 7:30am
> and I might post again anytime after that. Any time from 7pm until
> midnight are my most regular posting times as, strangely enough, that's
> the evening where most people are sitting at their computers. I don't
> determine what times Krypsis posts.
>
> Enough for now.

On 3/10/2021 10:53 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
> On 3/10/2021 9:42 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>> On 3/10/2021 9:38 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>> On 3/10/2021 7:04 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>> On 3/10/2021 7:23 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>> On 3/10/2021 3:55 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>> On 3/10/2021 2:24 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>>> On 3/10/2021 12:13 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 3/10/2021 12:39 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 3/10/2021 10:47 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 3/10/2021 6:41 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 2 Oct 2021 18:26:50 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/10/2021 6:11 pm, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 2 Oct 2021 17:41:17 +1000, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He doesn't seem to mention Krypsis much these days, does he?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> And you don't mention your fictitious achievements at all
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fraudster.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> And acrimonious alwee squeaks but what about him yet again.
>>>>>>>>>>> The pen of my aunt is in the garden.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "La plume de ma tante". I suspect  your reply is beyond his ken.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And up popped pitiful Pete with nothing to say as usual.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> mon tailleur est riche
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> you need to up your meds Douggie ol'son..
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Oh oh, I've been bitchslapped with a damp feather. You suspected
>>>>>>> Alwee's comment was beyond my ken, I responded with the perfect
>>>>>>> response to your 'La plume...' It basically is a joke french
>>>>>>> saying that is used when you don't know what to say in English.
>>>>>>> Which is fairly accurate in this situation for you. You only
>>>>>>> seem to have the guts to say anything when you know you have the
>>>>>>> backing of the flc, otherwise your a coward of the highest order.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> look whose talking. when did you last serve your country?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Completely irrelevant as usual. However, to answer your question,
>>>>> whilst I haven't actively served I have supported our forces as a
>>>>> civilian contractor and held the relevant clearances. Still
>>>>> putting your foot in your mouth. Have you actively served? I also
>>>>> have family who actively served including one who is at the moment.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> it's a bit rich calling someone 'a coward of the highest order'
>>>> when it's your Lord and Master who hides behind a killfile.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> He isn't my Lord and Master. Never has been, never will be. It's his
>>> decision to run a killfile. So what. You're the one who whimpers and
>>> simpers when the going gets too tough.
>>>
>>
>> you like making these accusations don't you. long on rhetoric, short
>> on fact. anyhoo, enough of you, fuck off.
>>
>>
> So let's see now, Felix whimpers and simpers then says fuck off.
> Doesn't answer whether he actively served. Guess the going got too
> tough for him. Perhaps we should call him precious pete... Poor little
> petal.

no sunshine, i'm just not interested. go find someone else to (try to) annoy

--
"A mans got to know his limitations"
- clint Eastwood as Dirty Harry

On 3/10/2021 8:08 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> On 3/10/2021 5:56 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:

>>>> so you're German? or just trying to appear smart
>>>>
>>> 小さなフェリックスがカーテンの下から覗き、「私も」と鳴いた
>>>
>>
>> so you're just being infantile and stupid then
>>
> فيليكس الصغير اختلس النظر من تحت الستار وصرير "أنا أيضا"

Nice work Keith. You're doing a fine job of making yourself look like
just as much of a twat as the people you're criticizing :)

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

On 3/10/2021 10:53 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
> On 3/10/2021 9:42 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:

>>
>> you like making these accusations don't you. long on rhetoric, short
>> on fact. anyhoo, enough of you, fuck off.
>>
>>
> So let's see now, Felix whimpers and simpers then says fuck off.

Typical Felix.

> Doesn't answer whether he actively served. Guess the going got too tough for
> him. Perhaps we should call him precious pete... Poor little petal.

If I remember correctly he mentioned once he was a National Serviceman,
but he only ever mentioned it briefly in passing and never went into
detail. Still, given how clueless he is I suspect he did his "Nasho" in
the catering corps :)

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

On Sun, 3 Oct 2021 20:38:04 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:

> On 3/10/2021 7:04 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>> On 3/10/2021 7:23 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>> On 3/10/2021 3:55 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>> On 3/10/2021 2:24 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>> On 3/10/2021 12:13 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>> On 3/10/2021 12:39 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>>> On 3/10/2021 10:47 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 3/10/2021 6:41 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 2 Oct 2021 18:26:50 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 2/10/2021 6:11 pm, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 2 Oct 2021 17:41:17 +1000, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> He doesn't seem to mention Krypsis much these days, does he?
>>>>>>>>>>> And you don't mention your fictitious achievements at all
>>>>>>>>>>> Fraudster.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> And acrimonious alwee squeaks but what about him yet again.
>>>>>>>>> The pen of my aunt is in the garden.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "La plume de ma tante". I suspect  your reply is beyond his ken.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And up popped pitiful Pete with nothing to say as usual.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> mon tailleur est riche
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> you need to up your meds Douggie ol'son..
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Oh oh, I've been bitchslapped with a damp feather. You suspected
>>>>> Alwee's comment was beyond my ken, I responded with the perfect
>>>>> response to your 'La plume...' It basically is a joke french saying
>>>>> that is used when you don't know what to say in English. Which is
>>>>> fairly accurate in this situation for you. You only seem to have the
>>>>> guts to say anything when you know you have the backing of the flc,
>>>>> otherwise your a coward of the highest order.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> look whose talking. when did you last serve your country?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Completely irrelevant as usual. However, to answer your question,
>>> whilst I haven't actively served I have supported our forces as a
>>> civilian contractor and held the relevant clearances. Still putting
>>> your foot in your mouth. Have you actively served? I also have family
>>> who actively served including one who is at the moment.
>>
>> it's a bit rich calling someone 'a coward of the highest order' when
>> it's your Lord and Master who hides behind a killfile.
>>
> He isn't my Lord and Master. Never has been, never will be.

If that's the case then Gumps, would you mind answering this simple
question.

Do you believe all the Big Claims that The Fraudster has made in this ng?
(NA of A, multiple quals, owns a property on the Sunny Coast, membership of
VACC, father "fought" in the Korean conflict et al).

Oty Gumps.

alvey

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On Sun, 3 Oct 2021 22:59:21 +1100, Noddy wrote:

> On 3/10/2021 9:38 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>> On 3/10/2021 7:04 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>
>>> it's a bit rich calling someone 'a coward of the highest order' when
>>> it's your Lord and Master who hides behind a killfile.
>>>
>>>
>> He isn't my Lord and Master. Never has been, never will be. It's his
>> decision to run a killfile. So what. You're the one who whimpers and
>> simpers when the going gets too tough.
>
> Isn't this just typical Felix? Whinges when you talk to him, and whinges
> when you plonk him. There's no happy middle ground for this idiot, but
> that seems to be okay as long as he can whinge.
>
> And you're absolutely spot on there Grumps. The person who has the
> *biggest* history of running away crying like the Victim he makes
> himself out to be is none other than our resident little "me tooer".

Oh dear.
How can anyone be so totally lacking in self-awareness? It's positively
scary. Or hilarious. Can't make my mind up.
>
> Jeez. Imagine how he's carry on if you did something *really* nasty like
> called him a "Pedophile" or something..... :)

lol!
What was that about playing the "Victim" (sic) Der Der?

Also Der Der, if you don't want anyone to suggest that you're a paedophile
then I'd opine that you drop all future references to children. You know,
like this selection.

"like a little girl with sand in her vagina"
"Amusing to see him sooking like a little girl though"
"like a little girl with sand up your vagina making whinging bitch posts"
"Talk about a pretentious fucking *twat* who can dish it out
but cries like a little girl when he gets it back...."
"but then whinge like a little girl who has sand up her twat"
"you cry like a little girl with sand up her twat when it happens to you"
"You'd sook like a little girl..."
" cry like a little girl when he gets it back."
"have something to whine like a little girl about."
"Claims the little girl who..."
"crack the shits and run off like a crying little girl"
"You stir shit for the "entertainment" factor, and then sook like a little
girl when you get it."
"whinges like a little girl with sand up her twat when he gets it."
"Instead of constantly whinging about this like a stupid little girl who's
lost her Barbie doll"
" but you jump up and down like a little girl with sand up her Vagina
whenever..."

That selection is only from the last couple of years *and* on one string
search. Dennis knows what else is in there.

alvey
Closing with the truly disturbing, "And then runs off sooking like a little
girl with sand up his vagina after he gets his arse handed to him."

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On Sun, 3 Oct 2021 23:01:09 +1100, Noddy wrote:

> On 3/10/2021 1:03 pm, jonz wrote:
>> On 10/3/2021 6:41 AM, alvey wrote:
>>> On Sat, 2 Oct 2021 18:26:50 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2/10/2021 6:11 pm, alvey wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 2 Oct 2021 17:41:17 +1000, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> He doesn't seem to mention Krypsis much these days, does he?
>>>>> And you don't mention your fictitious achievements at all Fraudster.
>>>>>
>>>> And acrimonious alwee squeaks but what about him yet again.
>>> The pen of my aunt is in the garden.
>>
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>
>>  Alvira casts herself as the protagonist, however, she is more of an
>> annoying mossie!. Pfffftttt.
>
> Soap box screaming attention whore.

lol!

Poor Fraudster. Such an "attention whore" that he's *still* yapping at
those he's run away from and whom he routinely claims to have no interest
in what they say. If confliction was debilitating then Der Der would be in
a wheelchair with his tongue hanging out.

You're a liar, fraud, coward and hypoctite Der Der. Feel free to challenge
any of these facts.

alvey

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On 4/10/2021 6:21 am, alvey wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Oct 2021 20:38:04 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>
>> On 3/10/2021 7:04 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>> On 3/10/2021 7:23 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>> On 3/10/2021 3:55 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>> On 3/10/2021 2:24 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>> On 3/10/2021 12:13 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>> On 3/10/2021 12:39 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 3/10/2021 10:47 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 3/10/2021 6:41 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 2 Oct 2021 18:26:50 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/10/2021 6:11 pm, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 2 Oct 2021 17:41:17 +1000, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> He doesn't seem to mention Krypsis much these days, does he?
>>>>>>>>>>>> And you don't mention your fictitious achievements at all
>>>>>>>>>>>> Fraudster.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> And acrimonious alwee squeaks but what about him yet again.
>>>>>>>>>> The pen of my aunt is in the garden.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "La plume de ma tante". I suspect  your reply is beyond his ken.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And up popped pitiful Pete with nothing to say as usual.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> mon tailleur est riche
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> you need to up your meds Douggie ol'son..
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Oh oh, I've been bitchslapped with a damp feather. You suspected
>>>>>> Alwee's comment was beyond my ken, I responded with the perfect
>>>>>> response to your 'La plume...' It basically is a joke french saying
>>>>>> that is used when you don't know what to say in English. Which is
>>>>>> fairly accurate in this situation for you. You only seem to have the
>>>>>> guts to say anything when you know you have the backing of the flc,
>>>>>> otherwise your a coward of the highest order.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> look whose talking. when did you last serve your country?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Completely irrelevant as usual. However, to answer your question,
>>>> whilst I haven't actively served I have supported our forces as a
>>>> civilian contractor and held the relevant clearances. Still putting
>>>> your foot in your mouth. Have you actively served? I also have family
>>>> who actively served including one who is at the moment.
>>>
>>> it's a bit rich calling someone 'a coward of the highest order' when
>>> it's your Lord and Master who hides behind a killfile.
>>>
>> He isn't my Lord and Master. Never has been, never will be.
>
> If that's the case then Gumps, would you mind answering this simple
> question.
>
> Do you believe all the Big Claims that The Fraudster has made in this ng?
> (NA of A, multiple quals, owns a property on the Sunny Coast, membership of
> VACC, father "fought" in the Korean conflict et al).
>
> Oty Gumps.
>

I honestly don't give a shit. It's entertainment. Do you believe
everything you read. Do you get angry when a movie doesn't follow the
plot in the book. It doesn't matter, it's purely for entertainment.
What's funnier is how twisted your knickers and the knickers of those in
the flc have become. In saying that though, his workmanship that I have
seen in person is exceptionally good.

It's like a guy I used to work with. He big noted himself all the time.
I thought at first that he was just a big mouth but I watched him work
on gear and realized he could back it up.

I'm the same. I have zero tolerance for bullshit when I'm working, I get
in and get the job done normally on the first attempt. Pretty handy when
a company is losing thousands every hour they are down. Yeah i have
qualifications and so do others but there is nothing worse than working
with someone who has a qualification but doesn't have a clue what they
are doing.

FWIW My grandfather was an electrical engineer, His brother was a
mechanical engineer, my uncle was a mechanic and prior to that an
armourer in WW2. I had another uncle who was a mechanic in Geelong. I
had another great uncle who was a clockmaker. I've seen lots of quality
work and Noddy's work is up there. I've seen the efforts of others and
they may have all the theory under the sun but when it comes to the
practical they are full of it.

On Mon, 4 Oct 2021 06:57:46 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:

> On 4/10/2021 6:21 am, alvey wrote:
>> On Sun, 3 Oct 2021 20:38:04 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/10/2021 7:04 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>> On 3/10/2021 7:23 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>> On 3/10/2021 3:55 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>> On 3/10/2021 2:24 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>>> On 3/10/2021 12:13 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 3/10/2021 12:39 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 3/10/2021 10:47 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 3/10/2021 6:41 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 2 Oct 2021 18:26:50 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/10/2021 6:11 pm, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 2 Oct 2021 17:41:17 +1000, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He doesn't seem to mention Krypsis much these days, does he?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> And you don't mention your fictitious achievements at all
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fraudster.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> And acrimonious alwee squeaks but what about him yet again.
>>>>>>>>>>> The pen of my aunt is in the garden.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "La plume de ma tante". I suspect  your reply is beyond his ken.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And up popped pitiful Pete with nothing to say as usual.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> mon tailleur est riche
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> you need to up your meds Douggie ol'son..
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Oh oh, I've been bitchslapped with a damp feather. You suspected
>>>>>>> Alwee's comment was beyond my ken, I responded with the perfect
>>>>>>> response to your 'La plume...' It basically is a joke french saying
>>>>>>> that is used when you don't know what to say in English. Which is
>>>>>>> fairly accurate in this situation for you. You only seem to have the
>>>>>>> guts to say anything when you know you have the backing of the flc,
>>>>>>> otherwise your a coward of the highest order.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> look whose talking. when did you last serve your country?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Completely irrelevant as usual. However, to answer your question,
>>>>> whilst I haven't actively served I have supported our forces as a
>>>>> civilian contractor and held the relevant clearances. Still putting
>>>>> your foot in your mouth. Have you actively served? I also have family
>>>>> who actively served including one who is at the moment.
>>>>
>>>> it's a bit rich calling someone 'a coward of the highest order' when
>>>> it's your Lord and Master who hides behind a killfile.
>>>>
>>> He isn't my Lord and Master. Never has been, never will be.
>>
>> If that's the case then Gumps, would you mind answering this simple
>> question.
>>
>> Do you believe all the Big Claims that The Fraudster has made in this ng?
>> (NA of A, multiple quals, owns a property on the Sunny Coast, membership of
>> VACC, father "fought" in the Korean conflict et al).
>>
>> Oty Gumps.
>>
>
> I honestly don't give a shit. It's entertainment. Do you believe
> everything you read. Do you get angry when a movie doesn't follow the
> plot in the book. It doesn't matter, it's purely for entertainment.
> What's funnier is how twisted your knickers and the knickers of those in
> the flc have become.

See, you're hopelessly wrong there. I'm a retired old fart living on the
Sunny Coast. Knickers are rarely worn by that demographic.

Anyhoo, have you considered that some people may not share your...errr...
'novel' opinion of being routinely and baselessly abused by a proven liar
as "entertainment"? And if it is "entertainment" for you Gumps, why then do
you get so wound-up and abusive about things said to you? A tad
hypocritical that Gumps, *and* shows your rationale to be... 'dubious'.

> In saying that though, his workmanship that I have
> seen in person is exceptionally good.

Why do you lot keep running this pointless flag up the pole? The quality of
The Fraud's workmanship has *never* been an issue, (And what it has to do
with his non-spanner claims is beyond me), it's that he lies Gumps. (Plus
abuses, runs away etc etc).

Can you imagine what this group, any group, would be like if everyone
carried on like The Fraud? It'd be cornidge Ritchie. If one bat-shit crazy
sociopath can make this group what it is, ie *not* "entertaining", imagine
what a shedload would be like?

alvey

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On 4/10/2021 7:57 am, Grumpy Tech wrote:
> On 4/10/2021 6:21 am, alvey wrote:
>> On Sun, 3 Oct 2021 20:38:04 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:

>> If that's the case then Gumps, would you mind answering this simple
>> question.
>>
>> Do you believe all the Big Claims that The Fraudster has made in this ng?
>> (NA of A, multiple quals, owns a property on the Sunny Coast,
>> membership of
>> VACC, father "fought" in the Korean conflict et al).
>>
>> Oty Gumps.
>>
>
> I honestly don't give a shit. It's entertainment. Do you believe
> everything you read. Do you get angry when a movie doesn't follow the
> plot in the book. It doesn't matter, it's purely for entertainment.
> What's funnier is how twisted your knickers and the knickers of those in
> the flc have become. In saying that though, his workmanship that I have
> seen in person is exceptionally good.

That's beside the point. The interesting thing to observe here is why do
people like Alvey get *so* worked up over whether my claims are true or
not? I mean, at the end of the day what the fuck is it to them? why do
they even *care*? Is it because they want to be "boss" of some pissy
little newsgroup that no one gives a toss about, or is it a personal
insecurity thing where they just *have* to be dismissive of other
people's claims in order to make themselves feel a little bit less
insignificant?

It's quite bizarre really when you think about it, but nowhere near as
bizarre as how absolutely batshit fucking *crazy* they make themselves
look in pursuing it :)

> It's like a guy I used to work with. He big noted himself all the time.
> I thought at first that he was just a big mouth but I watched him work
> on gear and realized he could back it up.
>
> I'm the same. I have zero tolerance for bullshit when I'm working, I get
> in and get the job done normally on the first attempt. Pretty handy when
> a company is losing thousands every hour they are down. Yeah i have
> qualifications and so do others but there is nothing worse than working
> with someone who has a qualification but doesn't have a clue what they
> are doing.

I've said it before and it's an ideology I'll subscribe to until the day
I die: Having a qualification is *no* guarantee of a person's ability to
be competent. People like Clasener will scream black and blue that this
is not the case, but he couldn't be any more wrong if he wanted to be
and he's the *perfect* example of that. This is a man who boasts about
his automotive qualifications as if there is something extraordinary
about them, yet when it comes to basic automotive knowledge he is
completely out of his fucking depth. His understanding of even the most
basic of concepts such as brake and fuel systems is *so* abhorrently
lacking that it makes you wonder if he had *any* actual hands on
experience in the automotive industry at all.

And sadly, he's not the only one. I've worked with *many* people in the
automotive industry over the years with skill sets ranging from
staggeringly brilliant to appallingly limited, and there is no direct
correlation between qualification and ability. Some qualified people are
absolutely hopeless while some unqualified people have been the best at
what they do that I personally have ever seen. And you don't just see
this in the automotive field either. It's in all walks of life, both
white and blue collar.

Some people are good and some aren't. It's as basic as that, and no
amount of training can ever change that.

> FWIW My grandfather was an electrical engineer, His brother was a
> mechanical engineer, my uncle was a mechanic and prior to that an
> armourer in WW2. I had another uncle who was a mechanic in Geelong. I
> had another great uncle who was a clockmaker. I've seen lots of quality
> work and Noddy's work is up there. I've seen the efforts of others and
> they may have all the theory under the sun but when it comes to the
> practical they are full of it.

Indeed.

I've spent a fair portion of the last 10 years at least fixing the fuck
ups of others. People who like to bignote themselves about how great
they are but only serve to demonstrate who clueless they can be when it
comes time to putting at that talk to practical use. Like a bloke in
town here for example who likes to cite himself as a "race engine
builder" who I somewhat recently had to fix one of his fuck-ups after he
assembled a 347 windsor with the piston rings on upside down and the
timing chain rubbing on the front of the block because the crank
sprocket needed a spacer between it and the number 1 main journal and he
didn't have the ability to make one.

It's fucking ridiculous, and I see this stuff *all* the time. More often
than not it's from young kids who are straight out of school and who
think there is nothing to mastering any kind of speciality because some
Youtube video showed them all how "easy" it is.

At the end of the day, no amount of "qualification" can make up for
common sense and experience, and people like Clasener only serve to
highlight that.

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

On 4/10/2021 8:28 am, alvey wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Oct 2021 06:57:46 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>
>> On 4/10/2021 6:21 am, alvey wrote:
>>> On Sun, 3 Oct 2021 20:38:04 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 3/10/2021 7:04 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>> On 3/10/2021 7:23 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>> On 3/10/2021 3:55 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>> On 3/10/2021 2:24 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 3/10/2021 12:13 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 3/10/2021 12:39 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 3/10/2021 10:47 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/10/2021 6:41 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 2 Oct 2021 18:26:50 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/10/2021 6:11 pm, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 2 Oct 2021 17:41:17 +1000, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He doesn't seem to mention Krypsis much these days, does he?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And you don't mention your fictitious achievements at all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fraudster.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> And acrimonious alwee squeaks but what about him yet again.
>>>>>>>>>>>> The pen of my aunt is in the garden.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "La plume de ma tante". I suspect  your reply is beyond his ken.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> And up popped pitiful Pete with nothing to say as usual.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> mon tailleur est riche
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> you need to up your meds Douggie ol'son..
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Oh oh, I've been bitchslapped with a damp feather. You suspected
>>>>>>>> Alwee's comment was beyond my ken, I responded with the perfect
>>>>>>>> response to your 'La plume...' It basically is a joke french saying
>>>>>>>> that is used when you don't know what to say in English. Which is
>>>>>>>> fairly accurate in this situation for you. You only seem to have the
>>>>>>>> guts to say anything when you know you have the backing of the flc,
>>>>>>>> otherwise your a coward of the highest order.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> look whose talking. when did you last serve your country?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Completely irrelevant as usual. However, to answer your question,
>>>>>> whilst I haven't actively served I have supported our forces as a
>>>>>> civilian contractor and held the relevant clearances. Still putting
>>>>>> your foot in your mouth. Have you actively served? I also have family
>>>>>> who actively served including one who is at the moment.
>>>>> it's a bit rich calling someone 'a coward of the highest order' when
>>>>> it's your Lord and Master who hides behind a killfile.
>>>>>
>>>> He isn't my Lord and Master. Never has been, never will be.
>>> If that's the case then Gumps, would you mind answering this simple
>>> question.
>>>
>>> Do you believe all the Big Claims that The Fraudster has made in this ng?
>>> (NA of A, multiple quals, owns a property on the Sunny Coast, membership of
>>> VACC, father "fought" in the Korean conflict et al).
>>>
>>> Oty Gumps.
>>>
>> I honestly don't give a shit. It's entertainment. Do you believe
>> everything you read. Do you get angry when a movie doesn't follow the
>> plot in the book. It doesn't matter, it's purely for entertainment.
>> What's funnier is how twisted your knickers and the knickers of those in
>> the flc have become.
> See, you're hopelessly wrong there. I'm a retired old fart living on the
> Sunny Coast.

there's a surprise. I thought you were a young bloke, about 30 yo

> Knickers are rarely worn by that demographic.
>
> Anyhoo, have you considered that some people may not share your...errr...
> 'novel' opinion of being routinely and baselessly abused by a proven liar
> as "entertainment"? And if it is "entertainment" for you Gumps, why then do
> you get so wound-up and abusive about things said to you? A tad
> hypocritical that Gumps, *and* shows your rationale to be... 'dubious'.
>
>> In saying that though, his workmanship that I have
>> seen in person is exceptionally good.
> Why do you lot keep running this pointless flag up the pole? The quality of
> The Fraud's workmanship has *never* been an issue, (And what it has to do
> with his non-spanner claims is beyond me), it's that he lies Gumps. (Plus
> abuses, runs away etc etc).
>
> Can you imagine what this group, any group, would be like if everyone
> carried on like The Fraud? It'd be cornidge Ritchie. If one bat-shit crazy
> sociopath can make this group what it is, ie *not* "entertaining", imagine
> what a shedload would be like?
>
>
>
> alvey
>

--
"A mans got to know his limitations"
- clint Eastwood as Dirty Harry

On 4/10/2021 11:03 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 4/10/2021 8:28 am, alvey wrote:
>> On Mon, 4 Oct 2021 06:57:46 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>
>>> On 4/10/2021 6:21 am, alvey wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 3 Oct 2021 20:38:04 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 3/10/2021 7:04 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>> On 3/10/2021 7:23 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>>> On 3/10/2021 3:55 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 3/10/2021 2:24 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 3/10/2021 12:13 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 3/10/2021 12:39 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/10/2021 10:47 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/10/2021 6:41 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 2 Oct 2021 18:26:50 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/10/2021 6:11 pm, alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 2 Oct 2021 17:41:17 +1000, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He doesn't seem to mention Krypsis much these days,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> does he?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And you don't mention your fictitious achievements at all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fraudster.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And acrimonious alwee squeaks but what about him yet again.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The pen of my aunt is in the garden.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> "La plume de ma tante". I suspect  your reply is beyond his
>>>>>>>>>>>> ken.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> And up popped pitiful Pete with nothing to say as usual.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> mon tailleur est riche
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> you need to up your meds Douggie ol'son..
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Oh oh, I've been bitchslapped with a damp feather. You suspected
>>>>>>>>> Alwee's comment was beyond my ken, I responded with the perfect
>>>>>>>>> response to your 'La plume...' It basically is a joke french
>>>>>>>>> saying
>>>>>>>>> that is used when you don't know what to say in English. Which is
>>>>>>>>> fairly accurate in this situation for you. You only seem to
>>>>>>>>> have the
>>>>>>>>> guts to say anything when you know you have the backing of the
>>>>>>>>> flc,
>>>>>>>>> otherwise your a coward of the highest order.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> look whose talking. when did you last serve your country?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Completely irrelevant as usual. However, to answer your question,
>>>>>>> whilst I haven't actively served I have supported our forces as a
>>>>>>> civilian contractor and held the relevant clearances. Still putting
>>>>>>> your foot in your mouth. Have you actively served? I also have
>>>>>>> family
>>>>>>> who actively served including one who is at the moment.
>>>>>> it's a bit rich calling someone 'a coward of the highest order' when
>>>>>> it's your Lord and Master who hides behind a killfile.
>>>>>>
>>>>> He isn't my Lord and Master. Never has been, never will be.
>>>> If that's the case then Gumps, would you mind answering this simple
>>>> question.
>>>>
>>>> Do you believe all the Big Claims that The Fraudster has made in
>>>> this ng?
>>>> (NA of A, multiple quals, owns a property on the Sunny Coast,
>>>> membership of
>>>> VACC, father "fought" in the Korean conflict et al).
>>>>
>>>> Oty Gumps.
>>>>
>>> I honestly don't give a shit. It's entertainment. Do you believe
>>> everything you read. Do you get angry when a movie doesn't follow the
>>> plot in the book. It doesn't matter, it's purely for entertainment.
>>> What's funnier is how twisted your knickers and the knickers of
>>> those in
>>> the flc have become.
>> See, you're hopelessly wrong there. I'm a retired old fart living on the
>> Sunny Coast.
>
>
> there's a surprise. I thought you were a young bloke, about 30 yo
>

makes me wonder now who's the oldest old fart among us

--
"A mans got to know his limitations"
- clint Eastwood as Dirty Harry

On 4/10/21 10:08 am, Noddy wrote:
> On 4/10/2021 7:57 am, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>> On 4/10/2021 6:21 am, alvey wrote:
>>> On Sun, 3 Oct 2021 20:38:04 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>
>>> If that's the case then Gumps, would you mind answering this simple
>>> question.
>>>
>>> Do you believe all the Big Claims that The Fraudster has made in this
>>> ng?
>>> (NA of A, multiple quals, owns a property on the Sunny Coast,
>>> membership of
>>> VACC, father "fought" in the Korean conflict et al).
>>>
>>> Oty Gumps.
>>>
>>
>> I honestly don't give a shit. It's entertainment. Do you believe
>> everything you read. Do you get angry when a movie doesn't follow the
>> plot in the book. It doesn't matter, it's purely for entertainment.
>> What's funnier is how twisted your knickers and the knickers of those
>> in the flc have become. In saying that though, his workmanship that I
>> have seen in person is exceptionally good.
>
> That's beside the point. The interesting thing to observe here is why do
> people like Alvey get *so* worked up over whether my claims are true or
> not? I mean, at the end of the day what the fuck is it to them? why do
> they even *care*? Is it because they want to be "boss" of some pissy
> little newsgroup that no one gives a toss about, or is it a personal
> insecurity thing where they just *have* to be dismissive of other
> people's claims in order to make themselves feel a little bit less
> insignificant?
>
> It's quite bizarre really when you think about it, but nowhere near as
> bizarre as how absolutely batshit fucking *crazy* they make themselves
> look in pursuing it :)
>
>> It's like a guy I used to work with. He big noted himself all the
>> time. I thought at first that he was just a big mouth but I watched
>> him work on gear and realized he could back it up.
>>
>> I'm the same. I have zero tolerance for bullshit when I'm working, I
>> get in and get the job done normally on the first attempt. Pretty
>> handy when a company is losing thousands every hour they are down.
>> Yeah i have qualifications and so do others but there is nothing worse
>> than working with someone who has a qualification but doesn't have a
>> clue what they are doing.
>
> I've said it before and it's an ideology I'll subscribe to until the day
> I die: Having a qualification is *no* guarantee of a person's ability to
> be competent. People like Clasener will scream black and blue that this
> is not the case, but he couldn't be any more wrong if he wanted to be
> and he's the *perfect* example of that. This is a man who boasts about
> his automotive qualifications as if there is something extraordinary
> about them, yet when it comes to basic automotive knowledge he is
> completely out of his fucking depth. His understanding of even the most
> basic of concepts such as brake and fuel systems is *so* abhorrently
> lacking that it makes you wonder if he had *any* actual hands on
> experience in the automotive industry at all.
>
> And sadly, he's not the only one. I've worked with *many* people in the
> automotive industry over the years with skill sets ranging from
> staggeringly brilliant to appallingly limited, and there is no direct
> correlation between qualification and ability. Some qualified people are
> absolutely hopeless while some unqualified people have been the best at
> what they do that I personally have ever seen. And you don't just see
> this in the automotive field either. It's in all walks of life, both
> white and blue collar.
>
> Some people are good and some aren't.

Very true.

It's as basic as that, and no
> amount of training can ever change that.

The good ones can learn with training and experience, the bad ones can't
be trained because they think that they already know everything.
I had 2 uncles that were diesel mechanics, I remember talking to one
(mum's brother in law) of them when I was still and apprentice and the
subject of torque wrenches and cylinder heads came up, I was dumbfounded
when he stated that he didn't need a torque wrench because he could
"feel" when a bolt was torqued correctly, after that I never took any
notice of anything else he said.
If I did that at the place I did my apprenticeship I would have gotten a
hit over the head and would have spent the next week cleaning the
workshop as punishment.
The other uncle (mum's brother) really knew his stuff.

--
Daryl

On Mon, 4 Oct 2021 10:08:31 +1100, Noddy wrote:

> On 4/10/2021 7:57 am, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>> On 4/10/2021 6:21 am, alvey wrote:
>>> On Sun, 3 Oct 2021 20:38:04 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>
>>> If that's the case then Gumps, would you mind answering this simple
>>> question.
>>>
>>> Do you believe all the Big Claims that The Fraudster has made in this ng?
>>> (NA of A, multiple quals, owns a property on the Sunny Coast,
>>> membership of
>>> VACC, father "fought" in the Korean conflict et al).
>>>
>>> Oty Gumps.
>>>
>>
>> I honestly don't give a shit. It's entertainment. Do you believe
>> everything you read. Do you get angry when a movie doesn't follow the
>> plot in the book. It doesn't matter, it's purely for entertainment.
>> What's funnier is how twisted your knickers and the knickers of those in
>> the flc have become. In saying that though, his workmanship that I have
>> seen in person is exceptionally good.
>
> That's beside the point. The interesting thing to observe here is why do
> people like Alvey get *so* worked up over whether my claims are true or
> not? I mean, at the end of the day what the fuck is it to them? why do
> they even *care*? Is it because they want to be "boss" of some pissy
> little newsgroup that no one gives a toss about, or is it a personal
> insecurity thing where they just *have* to be dismissive of other
> people's claims in order to make themselves feel a little bit less
> insignificant?

Fantastic day here on the Sunny. Loads of delicious brown bottoms on the
beach.

Anyhow, got a new game to try out. It's called 'Count Der Ders Errors'!

> That's beside the point. The interesting thing to observe here is why do
> people like Alvey get *so* worked up over whether my claims are true or
> not?

One. I don't get "worked up". The one who *does* get worked up would be the
hypocrite who ran away from simple questions to hide behind his (snigger)
killfail and yet *still* pours abuse on those he's too chicken to face.
Onya Der Der!

> I mean, at the end of the day what the fuck is it to them? why do
> they even *care*? Is it because they want to be "boss" of some pissy
> little newsgroup that no one gives a toss about

Two. Nope. There's only one person in here who wants to be "boss". That'd
be the hypocrite who is forever telling people to "fuck off"/"set yourself
on fire" if they don't measure up (down?) to his required behaviours.
That'd be you Der Der.

> or is it a personal insecurity thing where they just *have* to be dismissive of other
> people's claims in order to make themselves feel a little bit less
> insignificant?

Three. And a Great Big Laugh! Who's the insecure little failure who has
invented grandiose lies, bagged every successful person mentioned (eg.
Brock, Clarkson, Musk) *and* everyone in this toxic sewer who doesn't
admire the muck he walks in, all in a desperate attempt to raise his
miniscule standing? That'd be The Fraud. You know, if all of Der Der's
'Mirror' statements were printed one per A5 page, I very much doubt that
they'd fit in his tin shed.

So I make it four in one normal sized para. I suspect that'll be about The
Fraud's average.

alvey

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On 4/10/2021 12:50 pm, alvey wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Oct 2021 10:08:31 +1100, Noddy wrote:
>
>> On 4/10/2021 7:57 am, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>> On 4/10/2021 6:21 am, alvey wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 3 Oct 2021 20:38:04 +1000, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>> If that's the case then Gumps, would you mind answering this simple
>>>> question.
>>>>
>>>> Do you believe all the Big Claims that The Fraudster has made in this ng?
>>>> (NA of A, multiple quals, owns a property on the Sunny Coast,
>>>> membership of
>>>> VACC, father "fought" in the Korean conflict et al).
>>>>
>>>> Oty Gumps.
>>>>
>>> I honestly don't give a shit. It's entertainment. Do you believe
>>> everything you read. Do you get angry when a movie doesn't follow the
>>> plot in the book. It doesn't matter, it's purely for entertainment.
>>> What's funnier is how twisted your knickers and the knickers of those in
>>> the flc have become. In saying that though, his workmanship that I have
>>> seen in person is exceptionally good.
>> That's beside the point. The interesting thing to observe here is why do
>> people like Alvey get *so* worked up over whether my claims are true or
>> not? I mean, at the end of the day what the fuck is it to them? why do
>> they even *care*? Is it because they want to be "boss" of some pissy
>> little newsgroup that no one gives a toss about, or is it a personal
>> insecurity thing where they just *have* to be dismissive of other
>> people's claims in order to make themselves feel a little bit less
>> insignificant?
> Fantastic day here on the Sunny. Loads of delicious brown bottoms on the
> beach.
>
> Anyhow, got a new game to try out. It's called 'Count Der Ders Errors'!
>
>> That's beside the point. The interesting thing to observe here is why do
>> people like Alvey get *so* worked up over whether my claims are true or
>> not?
> One. I don't get "worked up". The one who *does* get worked up would be the
> hypocrite who ran away from simple questions to hide behind his (snigger)
> killfail and yet *still* pours abuse on those he's too chicken to face.
> Onya Der Der!
>
>> I mean, at the end of the day what the fuck is it to them? why do
>> they even *care*? Is it because they want to be "boss" of some pissy
>> little newsgroup that no one gives a toss about
> Two. Nope. There's only one person in here who wants to be "boss". That'd
> be the hypocrite who is forever telling people to "fuck off"/"set yourself
> on fire" if they don't measure up (down?) to his required behaviours.
> That'd be you Der Der.
>
>> or is it a personal insecurity thing where they just *have* to be dismissive of other
>> people's claims in order to make themselves feel a little bit less
>> insignificant?
> Three. And a Great Big Laugh! Who's the insecure little failure who has
> invented grandiose lies, bagged every successful person mentioned (eg.
> Brock, Clarkson, Musk) *and* everyone in this toxic sewer who doesn't
> admire the muck he walks in, all in a desperate attempt to raise his
> miniscule standing? That'd be The Fraud. You know, if all of Der Der's
> 'Mirror' statements were printed one per A5 page, I very much doubt that
> they'd fit in his tin shed.
>
> So I make it four in one normal sized para. I suspect that'll be about The
> Fraud's average.
>

luv your work :)

>
> alvey
>

--
"A mans got to know his limitations"
- clint Eastwood as Dirty Harry