AUSTRALIAN WAR CRIMES IN AFGHANISTAN: THE BRERETON REPORT

WRITTEN BY DOUGLAS GUILFOYLE

FACEBOOK SHARING BUTTON SHARE
TWITTER SHARING BUTTON TWEET
EMAIL SHARING BUTTON EMAIL
LINKEDIN SHARING BUTTON SHARE

ON THURSDAY 19 NOVEMBER AUSTRALIA FACED A RECKONING WITH ITS RECENT PAST IN
AFGHANISTAN.* AUSTRALIAN POLITICAL CULTURE APPROACHES OUR ARMED FORCES WITH A
GREAT DEGREE OF DEFERENCE AND RESPECT. THREE OF OUR LAST FOUR GOVERNORS GENERAL
HAVE BEEN, FOR EXAMPLE, SENIOR MILITARY LEADERS. THE AUSTRALIAN DEFENCE FORCE
SUPPORT OPERATIONS IN RESPECT OF THE JANUARY 2020 BUSHFIRES AND THE COVID19
PANDEMIC HAVE DRAWN WIDESPREAD AND DESERVED PRAISE. THERE HAS, HOWEVER, BEEN
SIGNIFICANT AND GROWING DISQUIET REGARDING REPORTS OF WAR CRIMES COMMITTED IN
AFGHANISTAN BY OUR SPECIAL FORCES. ON 19 NOVEMBER GENERAL ANGUS CAMPBELL, CHIEF
OF THE AUSTRALIAN DEFENCE FORCE, RELEASED THE SUMMARY OF THE FINAL REPORT OF A
LONG-RUNNING INQUIRY INTO THOSE ACCUSATIONS. (PRESS CONFERENCE TRANSCRIPT HERE;
REDACTED REPORT HERE.) THAT REPORT HAD BEEN COMMISSIONED BY THE INSPECTOR-
GENERAL OF THE AUSTRALIAN DEFENCE FORCE, AN INDEPENDENT OFFICE OUTSIDE THE
MILITARY CHAIN OF COMMAND.

THE PRESS CONFERENCE WAS A VERY SOBER AFFAIR. MUCH OF THE REPORT WILL REMAIN
REDACTED PENDING CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS. THE KEY FINDING BEING THAT THE REPORT
IDENTIFIES 23 INCIDENTS INVOLVING 39 KILLINGS BY 25 AUSTRALIAN PERSONNEL WHICH
APPEAR TO BE CASES OF CLEARLY UNLAWFUL KILLINGS WHICH WILL BE REFERRED FOR
PROSECUTION. CRITICALLY, THE REPORT APPARENTLY FINDS NONE OF THESE KILLINGS
OCCURRED IN HEAT OF BATTLE, NONE OCCURRED "IN CIRCUMSTANCES IN WHICH THE INTENT
OF THE PERPETRATOR WAS UNCLEAR, CONFUSED OR MISTAKEN", AND ALL PERSONS INVOLVED
UNDERSTOOD THE RELEVANT LAW OF ARMED CONFLICT AND THE RULES OF ENGAGEMENT.
GENERAL CAMPBELL ACKNOWLEDGED THAT THIS HAS DAMAGED "OUR MORAL AUTHORITY AS
MILITARY FORCE" BUT EMPHASISED "MANY THOUSANDS OF AUSTRALIANS ? SERVED IN
AFGHANISTAN AND DID THE RIGHT THING, PROFESSIONALLY AND WITH HONOUR; INCLUDING
MANY OF OUR SPECIAL FORCES PERSONNEL".

NONETHELESS, THE REDACTED REPORT INCLUDES THE GRIM SUMMARY THAT, IN RESPECT OF
ONE CHAPTER:

"WHAT IS DESCRIBED IN THIS CHAPTER IS POSSIBLY THE MOST DISGRACEFUL EPISODE
IN AUSTRALIA'S MILITARY HISTORY, AND THE COMMANDERS AT TROOP, SQUADRON AND TASK
GROUP LEVEL BEAR MORAL COMMAND RESPONSIBILITY FOR WHAT HAPPENED UNDER THEIR
COMMAND, REGARDLESS OF PERSONAL FAULT."

THE DETAILS OF THAT EPISODE(S) REMAIN REDACTED PENDING PROSECUTIONS. A CONCERN
FOR SOME TIME HAS BEEN THAT ANY PROSECUTIONS MAY INVOLVE PINNING ALL BLAME ON A
LIMITED NUMBER OF FRONTLINE SPECIAL AIR SERVICE REGIMENT 'OPERATORS' WITHOUT
ANY ACCOUNTABILITY FOR COMMANDING OFFICERS WHO EITHER KNEW OR SHOULD HAVE KNOWN
WHAT WAS HAPPENING. WILL THIS BE WHAT COMES TO PASS? IN THE Q&A AT THE END OF
THE PRESS CONFERENCE GENERAL CAMPBELL NOTED THAT THE SAS SECOND SQUADRON WILL
BE PERMANENTLY STRICKEN FROM THE ARMY ORDER OF BATTLE. THIS MEANS THAT SQUADRON
WILL BE DISBANDED AND ITS NUMBER NEVER USED AGAIN, LEAVING A PERMANENT
INSTITUTIONAL REMINDER. THE MOVE COULD BE SEEN TO IMPLY THAT ALL OR MOST
WRONGDOING WAS CONFINED TO THAT UNIT, BUT APPARENTLY THAT IS NOT THE CASE.
HOWEVER, THE REPORT APPARENTLY FINDS (IN THE WORDS OF GENERAL CAMPBELL):

"NO EVIDENCE THERE WAS KNOWLEDGE OF, OR RECKLESS INDIFFERENCE TO, THE
COMMISSION OF WAR CRIMES, ON THE PART OF TROOP, SQUADRON AND TASK GROUP
COMMANDERS, OR HIGHER COMMANDERS."

AS ONE JOURNALIST PUT IT IN THE PRESS CONFERENCE, IT IS A DIFFICULT FINDING TO
SWALLOW THAT NO ONE FROM THE RANK OF LIEUTENANT TO LIEUTENANT GENERAL HAD ANY
DIRECT KNOWLEDGE OF WHAT WAS GOING ON. (A POINT RETURNED TO BELOW.) THERE IS
CERTAINLY A QUESTION HERE FOR AUSTRALIA AS A SOCIETY AS WELL REGARDING "HOW WE
HOLD UP OUR SPECIAL FORCES AS HEROES, YET SEND THEM ON RELENTLESS DEPLOYMENTS
LACKING AN ACHIEVABLE OBJECTIVE".

BUT LET'S STEP BACK A MOMENT. HOW DID AUSTRALIA COME TO THIS POINT - AND WHAT
COMES NEXT?

WHAT IS THE BRERETON REPORT?

IN 2016 THE INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF THE AUSTRALIAN DEFENCE FORCE APPOINTED PAUL
BRERETON, A JUSTICE OF THE NSW COURT OF APPEAL AND A MAJOR GENERAL IN THE
AUSTRALIAN ARMY RESERVES, TO INQUIRE INTO RUMOURS OF BREACHES OF THE LAW OF
ARMED CONFLICT BY MEMBERS OF AUSTRALIAN SPECIAL FORCES OPERATING IN
AFGHANISTAN. THAT INQUIRY WAS A FACT-FINDING PROCESS, NOT A CRIMINAL TRIAL OR
INVESTIGATION. IT IS UNDERSTOOD TO HAVE EXAMINED 55 INCIDENTS, INCLUDING THE
EXECUTIONS OF UNARMED CIVILIANS OR PRISONERS, INTERVIEWED OVER 300 WITNESSES
AND JUSTICE BRERETON ALSO TRAVELLED TO AFGHANISTAN WITH INVESTIGATORS TO GATHER
EVIDENCE.

THE BRERETON INQUIRY HAD, HOWEVER, PRECURSORS. FIRST, THERE WAS THE INTERNAL
REPORT BY A SOCIOLOGIST, DR SAMANTHA CROMPVOETS, WHO WAS ORIGINALLY
COMMISSIONED TO PREPARE A REPORT ON ORGANISATIONAL CULTURE AND POOR RELATIONS
BETWEEN THE AUSTRALIAN SAS AND COMMANDOES. HER STATUS AS AN OUTSIDER, PERHAPS,
MADE WHISTLEBLOWERS MORE LIKELY TO COME FORWARD. HER FRANK REPORT - AND THE
WILLINGNESS OF GENERAL CAMPBELL TO FOLLOW THROUGH - IS CREDITED WITH LEADING TO
THE FOUR-YEAR BRERETON INQUIRY. THE AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL BROADCASTER, THE ABC,
ALSO RAN A SERIES OF STORIES "THE AFGHAN FILES" DETAILING ALLEGATIONS OF
AUSTRALIAN SPECIAL FORCES KILLING UNARMED CIVILIANS AND AIRED DAMNING FOOTAGE
OF THE EXECUTION OF AN UNARMED, PROSTRATE AFGHAN MAN HOLDING NOTHING BUT PRAYER
BEADS. THIS REPORTING WAS SAID TO HAVE "SHOCKED THE MILITARY ESTABLISHMENT".
FOR THEIR TROUBLE, ABC JOURNALISTS WERE INVESTIGATED BY THE AUSTRALIAN FEDERAL
POLICE FOR THE OFFENCE OF "UNAUTHORISED DISCLOSURE" OF CLASSIFIED MATERIAL
UNDER AUSTRALIAN SECRECY LAWS (SEE THE PARLIAMENTARY REPORT HERE). AUSTRALIA
HAS VERY LIMITED PROTECTIONS FOR JOURNALISTS IN SUCH CASES UNDER S. 122.5(6) OF
THE COMMONWEALTH CRIMINAL CODE WHICH PROVIDES NO IMMUNITY FROM PROSECUTION.
RATHER IT PROVIDES A LIMITED POSITIVE DEFENCE UNDER WHICH A JOURNALIST CAN
ATTEMPT TO PROVE, ONCE PROSECUTED, THAT THEY REASONABLY BELIEVED THEIR CONDUCT
TO BE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST.

IN ANY EVENT, IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT NONE OF THIS WOULD BE PUBLICLY KNOWN HAD
MILITARY WHISTLEBLOWERS NOT BEEN PREPARED TO COME FORWARD. (SOME OF WHOM STILL
FACE PROSECUTION FOR THAT WHISTLEBLOWING.) THEIR REPORTS, AND THOSE OF US
SERVICE PERSONNEL, ARE OF A SUB-GROUP OR GROUPS WITHIN AUSTRALIAN SPECIAL
FORCES WHO OPERATED OUTSIDE THE LAW OF ARMED CONFLICT WITH IMPUNITY. (US
ALLEGATIONS INCLUDE THE EXECUTION BY AUSTRALIAN SAS SOLDIERS OF A BOUND
PRISONER BECAUSE A US HELICOPTER COULD TAKE ONLY SIX, NOT SEVEN, PASSENGERS.)
IT SHOULD ALSO BE NOTED THAT A GROUP OF SERVING AND RETIRED SPECIAL AIR SERVICE
REGIMENT "OPERATORS" HAVE SPOKEN IN FAVOUR OF THE PROSECUTION OF CRIMINAL
CONDUCT, ALBEIT NOTING THEIR BEGRUDGING ACCEPTANCE OF "CONTINUALLY SHIFTING
GOAL POSTS AND DECISIONS MADE BY GOVERNMENTS IN THE ABSENCE OF A DEFINED
CAMPAIGN OUTCOME IN AFGHANISTAN".

WHAT HAPPENS NEXT? FROM FACT FINDING TO PROSECUTIONS

THE BRERETON REPORT WAS A FACT-FINDING EXERCISE WHICH HAS REPORTED ON THOSE
INCIDENTS WHERE IT FOUND "CREDIBLE INFORMATION" THAT AN OFFENCE OCCURRED.
FURTHER, AS AN ADMINISTRATIVE INQUIRY UNDER THE DEFENCE ACT 1903, WITNESSES DID
NOT ENJOY A RIGHT TO SILENCE BUT DID GIVE EVIDENCE UNDER LIMITED CONDITIONS OF
IMMUNITY (ESSENTIALLY PREVENTING A WITNESSES' COMPELLED TESTIMONY BEING USED
AGAINST THEM IN A CRIMINAL TRIAL BUT PERMITTING ITS USE AGAINST OTHERS). SO THE
REPORT WAS NEVER INTENDED TO, AND COULD NOT, SIMPLY ASSEMBLE CASE FILES AND
BRIEFS FOR EITHER DEFENCE SERVICE TRIBUNALS OR THE AUSTRALIAN FEDERAL POLICE.
THE REPORT RECOMMENDS (PARA 74):

"THAT ANY CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION AND PROSECUTION OF A WAR CRIME SHOULD BE
UNDERTAKEN BY THE AUSTRALIAN FEDERAL POLICE AND THE COMMONWEALTH DIRECTOR OF
PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS, WITH A VIEW TO PROSECUTION IN THE CIVILIAN CRIMINAL
COURTS, IN TRIAL BY JURY, RATHER THAN AS A SERVICE OFFENCE IN A SERVICE
TRIBUNAL."

NOTABLY, WHILE AUSTRALIAN WAR CRIMES LAW IS SET OUT IN DIVISION 268 OF THE
COMMONWEALTH CRIMINAL CODE SUCH CRIMES CAN ALSO BE PROSECUTED BEFORE DEFENCE
SERVICE TRIBUNALS UNDER S. 61 OF THE DEFENCE FORCE DISCIPLINE ACT 1982 (WHICH
ALLOWS THE PROSECUTION OF COMMONWEALTH OFFENCES ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD, AS IF
THEY HAD BEEN COMMITTED IN THE FEDERAL TERRITORY OF JERVIS BAY).

THE AUSTRALIAN FEDERAL POLICE HAVE ALREADY CARRIED OUT ONE UNSUCCESSFUL
PROSECUTION OF ALLEGED WAR CRIMES IN AFGHANISTAN. A 2009 PROSECUTION FAILED IN
RESPECT OF TWO SOLDIERS IN RESPECT OF THE DEATH OF SEVERAL CHILDREN KILLED WHEN
TWO GRENADES WERE TOSSED INTO A ROOM FROM WHICH A TALIBAN FIGHTER WAS SHOOTING.
THE CASE FAILED BECAUSE DIRECT INTENT COULD NOT BE MADE OUT, AND NEGLIGENT
MANSLAUGHTER PROVED TOO DIFFICULT TO ESTABLISH UNDER COMBAT CONDITIONS.
HOWEVER, THE FACTS OF THE CASES REFERRED HERE APPEAR TO BE MORE CLEAR CUT.

AN INVESTIGATORY AND PROSECUTORIAL MECHANISM HAS BEEN ANNOUNCED, THE OFFICE OF
THE SPECIAL INVESTIGATOR. THE SPECIAL INVESTIGATOR WILL, ACCORDING TO THE PRIME
MINISTER, "BE EITHER A SENIOR COUNSEL OR RETIRED JUDGE WITH EXTENSIVE CRIMINAL
LAW EXPERIENCE". THE TASK OF THE OFFICE WILL BE TO "INVESTIGATE ALLEGATIONS,
GATHER EVIDENCE AND WHERE APPROPRIATE, REFER BRIEFS TO THE COMMONWEALTH
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS ? FOR CONSIDERATION". THE OFFICE WILL BE HOUSED
IN THE DEPARTMENT OF HOME AFFAIRS AND, IT APPEARS, STAFFED BY PERSONNEL DRAWN
FROM THE AUSTRALIAN FEDERAL POLICE AND ELSEWHERE.

It was in relation to factual statements about SAS SOLDIER BEN
ROBERTS-SMITH as matter of war crimes presently before the court for
which the FACEBOOK ACCOUNT WAS SUSPENDED.

Accordingly,given the TECHNOLOGICAL proposition made against the
AMERICAN DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE written by Thomas Jefferson in
1776, that AMERICANS are excluded (ie. as eternity: temporal -->
infinity) of any association by cause of the term of my natural life.

Especially due to:
- Our objection on grounds of race / religion being impetus of habitual
violation of rights then being an exclusion of the US PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN

- Our integrity and trust as impetus for action made in response to 11
SEPTEMBER 2001 (and prior) being transgressed by the former US PRESIDENT
DONALD TRUMP especially given his rapport with nationalism / neo-nazis

EUGENE SCOTT (CNN) @ 1256 (GMT) 25 MAY 2017: "DISMAYED JOHN KERRY SAYS
HARVARD GRADS SHOULD 'BUY ROSETTA STONE AND LEARN RUSSIAN': "Democracy
relies on free speech. *Yes*, *say* *anything* *you* *want*, but it
relies even more on the speech being #940 - *truthful*.

#940 as [#1, #200, #500, #1, #30, #8, #200] = asphalḗs (G804): {UMBRA:
#940 % #41 = #38} 1) firm (that which can be relied on); 2) certain,
*true*; 3) suited to confirm;

@86, {@12: Sup: 79 - DIFFICULTIES: NAN (#500 - *HERE*); Ego: 5 - KEEPING
SMALL: SHAO (#79)}

“WE HOLD THESE #940 - *TRUTHS* TO BE SELF-EVIDENT, THAT ALL MEN ARE
CREATED EQUAL, THAT THEY ARE ENDOWED BY THEIR CREATOR WITH CERTAIN
UNALIENABLE RIGHTS, THAT AMONG THESE ARE #500 - *LIFE*, #500 -
*LIBERTY*, AND THE #501 - *PURSUIT* *OF* *HAPPINESS*." [AMERICAN
DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE written by Thomas Jefferson in 1776]

THE NOUMENON REFERENCE OBJECT AS THE NATURAL OR DIVINE LAW FOR ANY FORM
OF GOVERNMENT BY "DEVISING THE BIBLICAL IDEA TEMPLATE TO QUEEN
VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT AND HYPOTHESIS ON ONTIC VARIANCE"

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Letters%20Patent%20Variance.pdf>

@84, {@13: Sup: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#501 - *HERE*); Ego: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN
(#82)}

.... TEMPLATE TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT

@140] {@22: Sup: 55 - DIMINISHMENT: CHIEN (#940 - *HERE*); Ego: 59 -
MASSING: CHU (#298)}

It is the #940 - *truth* after all that sets us free," the former
Democratic presidential nominee said WEDNESDAY 24 MAY 2017 {

NOUMENON NOUS RESONANCE ON #33 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER ANCHOR OF 24 MAY + #17
- HETERONOMY AGAINST AUTONOMY (#2017) + #18 - END OF THE RUSSIAN TSAR
(#1918)

} at the Harvard Kennedy School graduation. "And the #940 - *truth* is
-- no, this is not a normal time."

"I've been asked, 'What is the secret to having a real impact on
government?' Well, it's recently changed. I used to say, 'Either run for
office or get a degree from the Harvard Kennedy School,'" he said. "But
with this White House, I'd say,

'*BUY* *ROSETTA* *STONE* *AND* *LEARN* *RUSSIAN*.'"

On 3/3/2022 12:11, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Mar 2022 19:07:44 -0600, AlleyCat <al@aohell.com> wrote:
>
>> AUSTRALIAN WAR CRIMES IN AFGHANISTAN: THE BRERETON REPORT
>
> I forgive them

-- FACEBOOK ACCOUNT SUSPENSION DUE FOR REPLYING TO 🤮 EMOTICON ABOUT
CAUSE OF WAR & FALSE MEDIA REPORTS AS LATER CONFIRMED

THE ACCUMULATION OF SUSPENSION DUE TO A PRIOR EVENT NEVER ACTIONED BY
THE FACEBOOK OVERSIGHT BOARD WAS EFFECTIVELY RESPONDING WITH THE TERM
"PUPPET" TO THE TERM "MUPPET" OR TO THAT EFFECT

FACEBOOK ACCOUNT SUSPENSION DUE FOR REPLYING TO 🤮 EMOTICON ABOUT CAUSE
OF WAR & FALSE MEDIA REPORTS AS LATER CONFIRMED

REFERENCE NUMBER: FB-ZDILWJGS appeal date: 18 MARCH 2022

The board only selects a very small number of appeals for review.

DETAILS:

The post relates to prior known redlines: Buffer zone (demilitarised),
non nato inclusion and neutrality and confirmed Belarus peace meeting on
28 February 2022 as factual and a failure of truthful media reports.

Graeme Dobson : “🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮” (THIS IS OFFENSIVE AND FALSE WHICH WAS
CONFIRMED THE NEXT DAY)

<https://www.facebook.com/Graeme.Dobson.Kensington>

Sandra Condon (ANOTHER POST) : “There seem to be so many atrocities
attributed to this man (ie. SAS SOLDIER BEN ROBERTS-SMITH as matter of
war crimes presently before the court). One has to wonder then how much
was done by others. If this behaviour was known and condoned or at least
accepted by those witnessing what does that say about all of them. Why
wait until now when someone has been honored. Is there a jealousy
mentality and we'll squash him vendetta going on. I would say with so
many stories there must be truth to some extent but I also feel that
those who held back from reporting for their own reasons are no better
than what Roberts appears to have been.”

(RESPONSE TO THAT EARLIER FACTUAL STATEMENT) Here is a simple historical
test that might be applied to your worldview to determine if it’s
similarly a construct of lies and nothing to be proud of:

The Eureka Rebellion of 1854 is not the birth place of democracy as it
was a year before the state constitution was framed and the Irish
Republican Activism of 1918 and 1920 conveying violent anti-British
sentiment [by 10,000 *soldiers* and 14 Victoria Cross Recipients] with
Catholic Archbishop MANNIX arrested for sedition.

We have to question whether the slaughter of aboriginals was similarly a
symptom of hatred against the crown by land holders given grants from
the crown and then acting against the crown.

And why no news media questioned the fidelity of World War One
centennial to the oath of service towards the person as sovereign.

Initial Post: 28 February 2022

WHY DID YOU POST THE COMMENT:

The comment was posted in relation to the following which was the next
day confirmed at the Belarus peace talks on the first news @ 0515 hours
on 1 MARCH 2022 it seems that our appraisal of cause for conflict being
a "denial of any possible inclusion of Ukraine within NATO and Russian
desire for a geographic buffer zone against Europe by countries
sympathetic to a neutral action."

27 FEBRUARY 2022: After several days we return again to our grounding
media contrasting opinion relative to the possibility of capitulation:

Namely that there is no resolution to the conflict until a proper
recognition is given to its APRIORITY cause.

As the denial of any possible inclusion of Ukraine within NATO and
Russian desire for a geographic buffer zone against Europe by countries
sympathetic to a neutral action.

And we note that such a notion being its total refusal as denial of
reality by the Ukrainian president which then has brought the invasion
consequence.

It has not subsequently entered the Ukrainian president’s mind that a
such recognition of neutral action can bring resolution.

Rather resolution is seen as only by means of conflict that is given
munitions by third parties in having thereby a consequence of prolonging
the conflict which is driven by Ukrainian hatred rather than principle.

The avenue of conflict is thought to be a means to earn EU membership.

That the participation of the Russians has a lack of any clear impetus
of action given personnel were engaged in war games and then redirected
to conflict which is sustained by contrived objectives as absurd statements.

There is no possibility of capitulation given since Ukraine has no
concept of APRIORITY cause and this has morphed into a rationalism over
entitlement as self justification.

Thus from our media appraisals if there is no elimination of the
Ukrainian president then the matter of conflict will be of a protracted
duration.

DOES THIS CONTENT INVOLVE IMPORT SOCIAL ISSUES:

IT WAS AN APPROACH TO VALIDATING ONE’S PRUDENT APPRAISALS IS GROUNDED IN
REALITY:

"Delegates from Ukraine and Russia have sat down for talks for the first
time since the invasion started last week.

They gathered in southeastern Belarus near the border with Ukraine on
Monday.

The Ukrainian side is urging an immediate ceasefire and withdrawal of
Russia's military.

The Russian delegation is demanding what it calls "demilitarization" of
Ukraine and a guarantee it will remain neutral. Moscow apparently wants
legal assurance that Ukraine won't join NATO."
<https://www3.nhk.or.jp/nhkworld/en/news/20220301_01/>

AND THAT MEDIA REPORTING WAS FALSE:

We note that whilst Japanese news (NHK Tokyo) could convey “denial of
any possible inclusion of Ukraine within NATO” being confirmation as to
the APRIORITY CAUSE of the conflict, that German news (DW) could not
make any such claim, French news (FRANCE24) then sought to redefine what
is meant by REDLINES and AL JAZEERA similarly omitted the fact by
instead obfuscating with every other imaginable detail which is probably
due to their denial of any European accountability for the conflict.

WHICH COUNTRIES IS THIS CONTENT RELEVANT TO:

Australia, Ukraine, Japan

WHICH KEYWORDS BEST DESCRIBES THE CONTENT:

Misinformation

PROVIDE A SUMMARY FOR YOUR SUBMISSION:

REPLY TO 🤮EMOTICON ABOUT CAUSE OF WAR & FALSE MEDIA REPORTS AS CONFIRMED