On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 20:36:50 +0000 (UTC), jew paedophile BARRY ZACHARY
SHEIN forging as Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells
<disgusted@tunbridge.wells> forged from STD.COM:

<jew forgery b'rissed>

Fuck orf, jewboi.

On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 20:38:06 +0000 (UTC), jew paedophile BARRY ZACHARY
SHEIN forging as Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells
<disgusted@tunbridge.wells> forged from STD.COM:

<jew forgery b'rissed>

Fuck orf, jewboi.

Bishop claims that child victims are partly to blame in priest sex-abuse cases

https://www.thetablet.co.uk/news/11740/more-priests-arrested-on-abuse-charges-in-us

One-third of child sex abuse in Poland is committed by priests

https://international.la-croix.com/news/religion/one-third-of-child-sex-abuse-in-poland-is-committed-by-priests/14732

SHOOSH!

Such FILTHY PAEDO PRIESTS innit!

On 25/07/2023 05:39 pm, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
> On 25/07/2023 16:46, JNugent wrote:
>> On 24/07/2023 02:52 pm, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>>
>>> On 24/07/2023 14:38, JNugent wrote:
>>>>
>>>> It has never been made clear how "poverty,  inequality and high
>>>> unemployment" act as "drivers" of criminal offences.
>>>>
>>>> Are poor people [however defined] less honest than those who are
>>>> more affluent? Are they perhaps more disposed to violence and murder
>>>> as well as to burglary and theft?
>>>
>>> Yes. They live in a world where people are to an extent desperate to
>>> survive. Petty theft, drugs and drink feature very much in their
>>> lives, as does a bit of casual violence. They don't tax or insure
>>> their cars or repair them to MOT standards, if at all. They buy cars
>>> that run, for a few hundred, and when they stop running they set fire
>>> to them.
>>
>> Does that mean that poor people [however defined] are automatically to
>> be treated as criminal?
>>
> No, but they are automatically more likely to commit certain sorts of crime

You bare claiming that an individual is more likely to be a criminal if
they haven't got much money (or income).

Have you thought of the import of that?

>> That is the import of the defence of crime on the basis that poverty
>> causes it (it doesn't).

> I don't think you know what it is to be poor.

I didn't *know* we were "poor" (partly because we were surrounded by
many others in the same boat), but you couldn't actually be more wrong
if you really tried hard.

Of course, I'm not "poor" (in any meaningful sense) *now*.

But that's after a working lifetime of effort and sacrifice.
>
>>>> If and when someone is poor, is he to be less trusted and
>>>> trustworthy than someone on twice or three times his income?
>
>>> Often yes, that is the case.
>
>> Hmmm...
>> Is that a "Yes" or a "No"?
>
> It's "Often, yes, that is the case".

That doesn't answer the question.

You were more bullish on the same topic some lines above.

> I presume you are an ArtStudent who can only manage Boolean logic and
> one dimensional thinking?

I am not a student. That was decades ago.

Did you have a point to make?

>>> I remember when sharing a flat in Belsize Park I remarked how much
>>> nicer Hampstead people were to where I had been living before -
>>> Crouch End. My flatmate grinned and said 'well, they can afford to be'
>
>>>> If not, why not? After all, "poverty" is apparently "a driver of
>>>> crime".
>
>>> Of petty crime. Once you move into the middle classes its more dirty
>>> little fiddles and once you get to the upper classes its confidence
>>> tricks and fraud by and large
>
>> I don't regard uninsured driving as "petty". Neither does the law.
>> Theft, trading in and/or using illegal drugs likewise.
>>
> They aren't on the same scale as defrauding consumers of millions, or
> murdering  the mother in law.

Are poor people more or less likely to commit murder than people who are
not "poor"?

Unless you hold that they are (or are not), you had no justification for
mentioning that crime.

No-one has ever defrauded me of millions for the most obvious of
reasons. In fact, I have no reason to believe or accept that I have ever
been defrauded of anything. I am, however, a consumer.
>
>> But since not all "poor people" indulge in those offences, it cannot
>> be the case that poverty causes them.
>
> Since not all people who go for a swim drown, it cant be the case that
> water in the lungs causes drowning.
> Seriously: get help

That's crazy. And you know it. It's an evasion and a strawman.
>
>> As for (properly) much-maligned "white collar crime", it's a good few
>> years ago now, but I found myself in very large agreement with the
>> American pundit who observed that no-one is afraid to go out at night
>> in case they get embezzled.

> A lot of people are afraid to go online ion case they get embezzled.

Their fear is excessively unjustified.

On 26/07/2023 09:32 am, Colin Bignell wrote:
> On 25/07/2023 16:47, JNugent wrote:
>> On 24/07/2023 07:07 pm, Colin Bignell wrote:
>>> On 24/07/2023 17:53, JNugent wrote:
>>>> On 24/07/2023 05:39 pm, Colin Bignell wrote:
>>>>> On 24/07/2023 16:48, JNugent wrote:
>>>>>> On 24/07/2023 04:19 pm, Colin Bignell wrote:
>>>>>>> On 24/07/2023 14:54, JNugent wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 24/07/2023 12:10 pm, Colin Bignell wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 24/07/2023 11:18, Fredxx wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 24/07/2023 09:35, Colin Bignell wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 24/07/2023 09:25, Fredxx wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 24/07/2023 08:36, Colin Bignell wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 24/07/2023 08:13, Fredxx wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 23/07/2023 14:08, Colin Bignell wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 23/07/2023 12:09, Fredxx wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 23/07/2023 10:46, Colin Bignell wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 23/07/2023 07:34, Fredxx wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 22/07/2023 23:39, Colin Bignell wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 22/07/2023 23:13, Carolyn Jean Swikard Berg wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Statistics don't lie:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As Mark Twain wrote, attributing it, possibly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mistakenly, to Disraeli:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> statistics
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only if you don't like the numbers.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/7856787/Violent-inner-city-crime-the-figures-and-a-question-of-race.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The article is 13 years old, but I doubt much has
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> However, that does not look into the reasons why a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> particular sector of the population is over-represented
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> compared to the general population. For that you need
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to include the drivers of crime, such as poverty,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> inequality and high unemployment, in the figures and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> see how that sector is represented among that part of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the population affected by those. Statistics that don't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> include those can and probably do lie.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Given that other ethnic minorities do not inhabit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prisons from the likes of gun crime disproportionately,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> why not simply put it down to culture?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If it was purely down to say whether a criminal received
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> free school dinners as a child there would be many
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> studies commissioned to show the correlation of the two
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> without an ethnic bias. But there aren't, simply because
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's an established fact that is criminality is cultural.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is far too simplistic a view. Poverty, inequality
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and high unemployment are proven factors in why people
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> commit crime. Culture is only proven to affect the types
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of crime they commit.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is that an admission that it is predominantly ethnicity,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> aka culture, that determines the likelihood of criminality?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is, in fact, the exact opposite.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> So your saying the quantity of crime is independent on race,
>>>>>>>>>>>> but agree for example, white collar crime is predominantly
>>>>>>>>>>>> carried out by Caucasian and gun crime predominantly by blacks?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> In response to a FOI request, the Metropolitan Police stated
>>>>>>>>>>> that there is insufficient data to break down the incidence
>>>>>>>>>>> of gun crime by ethnicity, even over a ten year period. If
>>>>>>>>>>> they can't say whether gun crime is predominantly the
>>>>>>>>>>> preserve of one particular ethnic group, I am not going to
>>>>>>>>>>> speculate.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Is the Telegraph making this up?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I have no idea.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>   "The data provide a breakdown of the ethnicity of the 18,091
>>>>>>>>>> men and boys who police took action against for a range of
>>>>>>>>>> violent and sexual offences in London in 2009-10.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> They show that among those proceeded against for street
>>>>>>>>>> crimes, 54 per cent were black; for robbery, 59 per cent; and
>>>>>>>>>> for gun crimes, 67 per cent."
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Perhaps, like yourself, the Metropolitan Police are fearful of
>>>>>>>>>> making any meaningful comment.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Gun and knife crime in the Met account for around 2% of violent
>>>>>>>>> crimes, the majority of those are knife crime and ethnicity is
>>>>>>>>> not recorded in all cases. Perhaps, unlike a journalist, the
>>>>>>>>> police recognise when the sample space is too small to produce
>>>>>>>>> any meaningful data.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And the victims and witnesses can never recognise the ethnicity
>>>>>>>> of the criminals, can they?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Even if the do, there is no guarantee that information will be
>>>>>>> recorded against the crime in the statistics.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *if*?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Are they all dressed up in SAS attire?
>>>>>
>>>>> A hoodie with a scarf over the face seems more probable. However,
>>>>> the main problem is that witnesses are notoriously unreliable. as
>>>>> well as probably being far more fixated on the weapon than on
>>>>> trying to recall things that might help the police.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Wouldn't that make them a bit easy to spot?
>>>>
>>>> Your position is puzzling.
>>>>
>>>> Are you seriously saying that when someone is robbed at knifepoint
>>>> (or worse) in the street, they cannot tell whether the perpetrator
>>>> was white or black?
>>>>
>>>> Or is it perhaps that they cannot be trusted to be truthful over it?
>>>>
>>>
>>> There have been many studies carried out to determine the accuracy of
>>> recall of witnesses to events and they all concluded that their
>>> memory is unreliable at the best of times. Studies of people subject
>>> to violent episodes, both as a result of crime and of conflict, show
>>> that their short term memory is affected and they may even suffer
>>> complete amnesia of the event. In general, dominant and extrovert
>>> personalities are the least likely to be affected, while submissive
>>> and introvert personalities are the most likely to be affected. So,
>>> even if they do see whether their attacker is black or white, some
>>> may be completely unable to recall that after the event. Their mind
>>> is shielding them from the trauma.
>>
>> Any actual data?
>>
>> Or just those vague aspersions, blaming the victims (and witnesses)?
>
> Some of the main works on the subject:
>
> Eye witnesses in general:
>
> Clifford B. R., & Scott J. (1978). Individual and situational factors in
> eyewitness testimony. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 352–359.
>
> Clifford B. R., & Hollin C. R. (1981). Effects of the type of incident
> and the number of perpetrators on eyewitness memory. Journal of Applied
> Psychology, 66, 364–370.
>
> Milne R., & Bull R. (1999). Investigative interviewing: Psychology and
> practice. (Wiley)
>
> Effects of personality on eye witness testimony:
>
> Ward R. A., & Loftus E. F. (1985). Eyewitness performance in different
> psychological types. The Journal of General Psychology, 112, 191–200.
>
> Liebman J. I., McKinley-Pace M. J., Leonard A.M., Sheesley L. A.,
> Gallant C. L., Renkey M. E., & Lehman E. B. (2002). Cognitive and
> psychological correlates of adult's eyewitness accuracy and
> suggestibility. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 49–66.
>
> Andersen S. M., Carlson C. A., Carlson M. A., & Gronlund S. D. (2014).
> Individual differences predict eyewitness identification performance.
> Personality and Individual Differences, 60, 36–40
>
> Pires R., Silva D. R., & Ferreira A. S. (2013). Personality styles and
> suggestibility: A differential approach. Personality and Individual
> Differences, 55, 381–386.

Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells wrote:
> One-third of child sex abuse in Poland is committed by priests
>
> https://international.la-croix.com/news/religion/one-third-of-child-sex-abuse-in-poland-is-committed-by-priests/14732
>
> SHOOSH!
>
> Such FILTHY PAEDO PRIESTS innit!
>
If such a thing happened in Poland's Jewish community, it would be a
major scandal!

Michael

Peeler wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Jul 23 22:13:36 UTC, Loose Sphincter, the unhappily married gay
> neo-nazitard, now STRUTTING around as Carolyn Jean Swikard Berg, whined
> again:
>
>> Statistics don't lie:
>>
>> https://niggermania.club/tom/newstuff/london%20nigger%20crimes.jpg
>
> Forever unable to get your superiors out of your sick gay neo-nazi head, you
> abysmally stupid ridiculous gay neo-nazitard? LOL
>
He is just jealous of me and Chris!

Michael

On 7/27/2023 12:05 PM, Michael Ejercito wrote:
> Peeler wrote:
>> On Sat, 22 Jul 23 22:13:36 UTC, Loose Sphincter, the unhappily married
>> gay
>> neo-nazitard, now STRUTTING around as Carolyn Jean Swikard Berg, whined
>> again:
>>
>>> Statistics don't lie:
>>>
>>> https://niggermania.club/tom/newstuff/london%20nigger%20crimes.jpg
>>
>> Forever unable to get your superiors out of your sick gay neo-nazi
>> head, you
>> abysmally stupid ridiculous gay neo-nazitard? LOL
>>
> He is just jealous of me and Chris!
>
>
> Michael

Why would anyone be jealous of a gook and a spook? The only thing
lower on the social ladder is a jew.

On Wednesday, July 26, 2023 at 10:36:33 AM UTC-4, Peeler wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Jul 2023 14:45:01 +0100, clinically insane, pedophilic, serbian
> bitch Razovic, the resident psychopath of sci and scj and Usenet's famous
> sexual cripple, making a total ass of herself as "Disgusted of Tunbridge
> Wells", farted again:
> > <jew spam b'rissed>
> >
> > Fuck orf, jewboi.
> I'm afraid

Everyone already knew that, you cowardly worm.

Carolyn Jean Swikard Berg wrote:
> On 7/27/2023 12:05 PM, Michael Ejercito wrote:
>> Peeler wrote:
>>> On Sat, 22 Jul 23 22:13:36 UTC, Loose Sphincter, the unhappily married
>>> gay
>>> neo-nazitard, now STRUTTING around as Carolyn Jean Swikard Berg, whined
>>> again:
>>>
>>>> Statistics don't lie:
>>>>
>>>> https://niggermania.club/tom/newstuff/london%20nigger%20crimes.jpg
>>>
>>> Forever unable to get your superiors out of your sick gay neo-nazi
>>> head, you
>>> abysmally stupid ridiculous gay neo-nazitard? LOL
>>>
>> He is just jealous of me and Chris!
>>
>>
>> Michael
>
> Why would anyone be jealous of a gook and a spook? The only thing
> lower on the social ladder is a jew.
>
They are all better than you!

Michael

On Fri, 28 Jul 2023 00:08:19 -0700, NOT Michael Ejercito
<MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:

>Carolyn Jean Swikard Berg wrote:
>> On 7/27/2023 12:05 PM, Michael Ejercito wrote:
>>> Peeler wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 22 Jul 23 22:13:36 UTC, Loose Sphincter, the unhappily married
>>>> gay
>>>> neo-nazitard, now STRUTTING around as Carolyn Jean Swikard Berg, whined
>>>> again:
>>>>
>>>>> Statistics don't lie:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://niggermania.club/tom/newstuff/london%20nigger%20crimes.jpg
>>>>
>>>> Forever unable to get your superiors out of your sick gay neo-nazi
>>>> head, you
>>>> abysmally stupid ridiculous gay neo-nazitard? LOL
>>>>
>>> He is just jealous of me and Chris!
>>>
>>>
>>> Michael
>>
>> Why would anyone be jealous of a gook and a spook? The only thing
>> lower on the social ladder is a jew.
>>
> They are all better than you!
>
>
> Michael

They are genitally mutilated semitic ragheads...they are not even
better than YOU, gook!

#gookejershito

--

The Illiterate Foreskin Peeling Grik anus admits he got
no life AT ALL outside stalking on THE Usenet!
"Frankly, if he were gone, I wouldn't know what to do here."
Message-ID: <FCOQt.107901$hp7.96925@fx13.fr7>

The Illiterate Foreskin Peeling Grik anus, defending his fellow
Grik sodomite the Grikboxer® and under the delusion that he's
been able to grow a pair: "You'd have to get past me first,"
Message-ID: <LOOQt.337647$Qr2.32934@fx08.fr7>

Yet more proof that the Illiterate Foreskin Peeling Grik anus
thinks he got a pair: "Just to let you know: ANYONE who "befriends"
the subnormal swine will have to deal with me! Get ready, bitch!"
Message-ID: <FHg6t.166438$Nl5.48106@newsfe07.iad>

The Illiterate Foreskin Peeling Grik anus STILL seems to think
he got a pair: "Which will NEVER happen! You'd have to get past
me first, poor psycho! LOL"
Message-ID: <MCSIu.1$c56.0@fx32.fr7>

The Illiterate Foreskin Peeling Grik anus having still MORE delusions
about growing a pair: "If ANYONE dared to grab me by the neck
like that he'd get my fist in his face."
Message-ID: <qeilfu$iog$1@gioia.aioe.org>

In spite of all the evidence, the Illiterate Foreskin Peeling Grik anus
STILL has delusions about growing a pair!
"What kind of other-worldly pussies (men?) are you all? If someone
would dare to grab me by the back of my neck like that and push me
around, my instinctive, AUTOMATIC reaction would be to knock him in
the face! NOBODY is allowed to do that to ANYONE!"
Message-ID: <qfnPE.73303$YG3.18805@usenetxs.com>

Best of all! From the Foreskin Peeler's doctoral dissertation in divinity,
'University' of Salonica (1992): "The jew g-d is your g-d's dad."

On Thu, 27 Jul 2023 09:05:30 -0700, NOT Michael Ejercito
<MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:

>Peeler wrote:
>> On Sat, 22 Jul 23 22:13:36 UTC, Loose Sphincter, the unhappily married gay
>> neo-nazitard, now STRUTTING around as Carolyn Jean Swikard Berg, whined
>> again:
>>
>>> Statistics don't lie:
>>>
>>> https://niggermania.club/tom/newstuff/london%20nigger%20crimes.jpg
>>
>> Forever unable to get your superiors out of your sick gay neo-nazi head, you
>> abysmally stupid ridiculous gay neo-nazitard? LOL
>>
> He is just jealous of me and Chris!
>
>
> Michael

Nu HUMAN has ever been jealous of a slant eyed mongoloid with a BLANK
mind or his coon ape lover.

--

The Illiterate Foreskin Peeling Grik anus admits he got
no life AT ALL outside stalking on THE Usenet!
"Frankly, if he were gone, I wouldn't know what to do here."
Message-ID: <FCOQt.107901$hp7.96925@fx13.fr7>

The Illiterate Foreskin Peeling Grik anus, defending his fellow
Grik sodomite the Grikboxer® and under the delusion that he's
been able to grow a pair: "You'd have to get past me first,"
Message-ID: <LOOQt.337647$Qr2.32934@fx08.fr7>

Yet more proof that the Illiterate Foreskin Peeling Grik anus
thinks he got a pair: "Just to let you know: ANYONE who "befriends"
the subnormal swine will have to deal with me! Get ready, bitch!"
Message-ID: <FHg6t.166438$Nl5.48106@newsfe07.iad>

The Illiterate Foreskin Peeling Grik anus STILL seems to think
he got a pair: "Which will NEVER happen! You'd have to get past
me first, poor psycho! LOL"
Message-ID: <MCSIu.1$c56.0@fx32.fr7>

The Illiterate Foreskin Peeling Grik anus having still MORE delusions
about growing a pair: "If ANYONE dared to grab me by the neck
like that he'd get my fist in his face."
Message-ID: <qeilfu$iog$1@gioia.aioe.org>

In spite of all the evidence, the Illiterate Foreskin Peeling Grik anus
STILL has delusions about growing a pair!
"What kind of other-worldly pussies (men?) are you all? If someone
would dare to grab me by the back of my neck like that and push me
around, my instinctive, AUTOMATIC reaction would be to knock him in
the face! NOBODY is allowed to do that to ANYONE!"
Message-ID: <qfnPE.73303$YG3.18805@usenetxs.com>

Best of all! From the Foreskin Peeler's doctoral dissertation in divinity,
'University' of Salonica (1992): "The jew g-d is your g-d's dad."

Loose Cannon wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Jul 2023 09:05:30 -0700, Michael Ejercito
> <MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:
>
>> Peeler wrote:
>>> On Sat, 22 Jul 23 22:13:36 UTC, Loose Sphincter, the unhappily married gay
>>> neo-nazitard, now STRUTTING around as Carolyn Jean Swikard Berg, whined
>>> again:
>>>
>>>> Statistics don't lie:
>>>>
>>>> https://niggermania.club/tom/newstuff/london%20nigger%20crimes.jpg
>>>
>>> Forever unable to get your superiors out of your sick gay neo-nazi head, you
>>> abysmally stupid ridiculous gay neo-nazitard? LOL
>>>
>> He is just jealous of me and Chris!
>
> You and he made a bestiality porn flick together.
Again with the bestiality?

>Normal WHITE people
> like me pity the likes of you and Morton
>
They respect us for our ideas.

Michael