On 25/02/2022 8:33 am, alvey wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Feb 2022 07:58:44 +1100, Noddy wrote:
>
>> On 25/02/2022 7:26 am, Peter Jason wrote:
>>> On Thu, 24 Feb 2022 17:17:00 +1100, Noddy <me@home.com> wrote:
>>>> That's extremely sexist of you. Stand by for a barrage of criticism from
>>>> the FLC about your misogynistic behaviour.
>>> They're silicone. That type knows how to turn men into puppy dogs.
>> You *really* are hell bent on showing everyone how much of a clueless
>> fuckwit you really are, aren't you?
>>
>> Felix will be along to be your best friend any minute...
> Great contribution Fraudster! Witty, factual, incisive. Yep, it's none of
> these. Just your normal toxic hissiness. If it wasn't for your ability to
> make sane people feel happy with what they are then you'd be a complete
> waste of time.
>

well said! :)

> alvey
> “And then runs off sooking like a little girl with sand up his vagina after
> he gets his arse handed to him.” Fraudster, 02Apr18
>

--
https://tinyurl.com/Yosemite-Sam
"His opinions have been crushed into insignificant dust by
the enormous weight of his lies"- Alvey on the Fraudster
"His self serving ego pumping comments just
read like witless wankery"- Clocky on Keefy

On 25/02/2022 4:58 am, Noddy wrote:
> On 25/02/2022 7:26 am, Peter Jason wrote:
>> On Thu, 24 Feb 2022 17:17:00 +1100, Noddy <me@home.com> wrote:
>
>>> That's extremely sexist of you. Stand by for a barrage of criticism from
>>> the FLC about your misogynistic behaviour.
>>
>> They're silicone.  That type knows how to turn men into puppy dogs.
>
> You *really* are hell bent on showing everyone how much of a clueless
> fuckwit you really are, aren't you?
>

So noting to add except more abuse...

> Felix will be along to be your best friend any minute...
>
>
....and dragging others into it to inject even more venom.

You're a bully, nothing more and nothing less. Ineffective given your
credibility is that of dog shit stuck to a shoe but a bully nonetheless.
The only real question is, will your enablers remain complicit to it in
silence or will they invent a justification to join in on a pack hunt?

On 25/2/22 07:58, Noddy wrote:
> On 25/02/2022 7:26 am, Peter Jason wrote:
>> On Thu, 24 Feb 2022 17:17:00 +1100, Noddy <me@home.com> wrote:
>
>>> That's extremely sexist of you. Stand by for a barrage of criticism from
>>> the FLC about your misogynistic behaviour.
>>
>> They're silicone.  That type knows how to turn men into puppy dogs.
>
> You *really* are hell bent on showing everyone how much of a clueless
> fuckwit you really are, aren't you?
>
> Felix will be along to be your best friend any minute...
>
>
Ah Darren, you're back to your SOP. You'll be passing off bullshit as
true next. After all, you are well practiced at it.

On 25/02/2022 11:47 am, Clocky wrote:
> On 25/02/2022 4:58 am, Noddy wrote:
>> On 25/02/2022 7:26 am, Peter Jason wrote:
>>> On Thu, 24 Feb 2022 17:17:00 +1100, Noddy <me@home.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> That's extremely sexist of you. Stand by for a barrage of criticism
>>>> from
>>>> the FLC about your misogynistic behaviour.
>>>
>>> They're silicone.  That type knows how to turn men into puppy dogs.
>>
>> You *really* are hell bent on showing everyone how much of a clueless
>> fuckwit you really are, aren't you?
>>
>
> So nothing to add except more abuse...

how unsurprising. not!

>
>> Felix will be along to be your best friend any minute...
>>
>>
> ...and dragging others into it to inject even more venom.

yep!

>
>
> You're a bully, nothing more and nothing less.

a keyboard bully in fact. I wonder how tough he is IRL?

> Ineffective given your credibility is that of dog shit stuck to a shoe
> but a bully nonetheless. The only real question is, will your enablers
> remain complicit to it in silence or will they invent a justification
> to join in on a pack hunt?
>

yeah

--
https://tinyurl.com/Yosemite-Sam
"His opinions have been crushed into insignificant dust by
the enormous weight of his lies"- Alvey on the Fraudster
"His self serving ego pumping comments just
read like witless wankery"- Clocky on Keefy

On 24/02/2022 9:56 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 24/02/2022 5:35 pm, Daryl wrote:
>> On 24/2/2022 5:17 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>> On 24/02/2022 3:36 pm, Peter Jason wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 24 Feb 2022 15:08:13 +1100, Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au>
>>>
>>>>>> but what prevents those machines from flipping over? shirley it's not
>>>>>> just the skill of the driver?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> No wheelie bars visible so I guess it's all down to skill. ;-)
>>>>
>>>> Echually it's all about who pays the bill.
>>>>
>>>> Q: Who would dress like that and risk road injuries, bug bites, sun UV
>>>> radiation, cold, heat, busted limbs and a sullied reputation???
>>>>
>>>> A: Because sugar daddy said so.
>>>
>>> That's extremely sexist of you. Stand by for a barrage of criticism
>>> from the FLC about your misogynistic behaviour.
>>>
>>> Fucking idiot....
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> He's also completely wrong.
>> People make money on Twitter and YouTube by having lots of "followers"
>> or "subscribers" or "likes", the more followers and likes the more
>> money they make from advertisers.
>> No "sugar daddy" required, she dresses the way she does and takes
>> risks because she makes money doing so, good luck to her.
>> Some people make enough money from such things for it to be a very
>> well paid full time job, some make $millions making "content".
>>
>>
>
> millions? i don't think so
>

Better believe it.

What I do find funny is that some of the clowns who paid out on you for
not noticing CGI fakery are likely watching staged clickbait
"restoration" videos believing they are real.

On 24/02/2022 3:40 pm, lindsay wrote:
> On 24/02/2022 5:35 pm, Daryl wrote:
>> On 24/2/2022 5:17 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>> On 24/02/2022 3:36 pm, Peter Jason wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 24 Feb 2022 15:08:13 +1100, Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au>
>>>
>>>>>> but what prevents those machines from flipping over? shirley it's not
>>>>>> just the skill of the driver?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> No wheelie bars visible so I guess it's all down to skill.  ;-)
>>>>
>>>> Echually it's all about who pays the bill.
>>>>
>>>> Q: Who would dress like that and risk road injuries, bug bites, sun UV
>>>> radiation, cold, heat, busted limbs and a sullied reputation???
>>>>
>>>> A: Because sugar daddy said so.
>>>
>>> That's extremely sexist of you. Stand by for a barrage of criticism
>>> from the FLC about your misogynistic behaviour.
>>>
>>> Fucking idiot....
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> He's also completely wrong.
>> People make money on Twitter and YouTube by having lots of "followers"
>> or "subscribers" or "likes", the more followers and likes the more
>> money they make from advertisers.
>
>
> Yep. clickbait. Flash your tits and score $$$.

If they were ugly they would have no views.

Not unlike quite a few
> females who are prepared to do whatever for "Onlyfans", Like former
> Supercar driver Rennae Gracie.. and more recently, that fucking silly
> bitch in Canberra who tried to drive around another car after a verbal,
> and ended up stuck
> https://www.facebook.com/100000568421467/videos/1098441494342647/ she's
> another slag who cant wait to get her pink bits out for a dollar on
> onlyfans, publicity means so much.... no self esteem whatsoever.
>

There is a series of videos showing the full exchange. Though the bitch
that parked her car on top of the other is clearly unhinged there is a
bit more to the story. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rn1-1Ap2gQ8

>
>> No "sugar daddy" required, she dresses the way she does and takes
>> risks because she makes money doing so, good luck to her.
>> Some people make enough money from such things for it to be a very
>> well paid full time job, some make $millions making "content".
>
> Shudder.
>>
>>
>

On 26/2/2022 12:54 am, Clocky wrote:
> On 24/02/2022 9:56 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>> On 24/02/2022 5:35 pm, Daryl wrote:
>>> On 24/2/2022 5:17 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>>> On 24/02/2022 3:36 pm, Peter Jason wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 24 Feb 2022 15:08:13 +1100, Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au>
>>>>
>>>>>>> but what prevents those machines from flipping over? shirley it's
>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>> just the skill of the driver?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No wheelie bars visible so I guess it's all down to skill. ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>> Echually it's all about who pays the bill.
>>>>>
>>>>> Q: Who would dress like that and risk road injuries, bug bites, sun UV
>>>>> radiation, cold, heat, busted limbs and a sullied reputation???
>>>>>
>>>>> A: Because sugar daddy said so.
>>>>
>>>> That's extremely sexist of you. Stand by for a barrage of criticism
>>>> from the FLC about your misogynistic behaviour.
>>>>
>>>> Fucking idiot....
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> He's also completely wrong.
>>> People make money on Twitter and YouTube by having lots of
>>> "followers" or "subscribers" or "likes", the more followers and likes
>>> the more money they make from advertisers.
>>> No "sugar daddy" required, she dresses the way she does and takes
>>> risks because she makes money doing so, good luck to her.
>>> Some people make enough money from such things for it to be a very
>>> well paid full time job, some make $millions making "content".
>>>
>>>
>>
>> millions? i don't think so
>>
>
>
> Better believe it.

For sure! A lot of Chinese Youtubers are well into the multi-millions
and recently had to pay tax on their earnings.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-59732499

https://www.businessinsider.com.au/china-livestreamers-rush-to-pay-back-taxes-amid-crackdown-2021-12

Of course they are using the Chinese *firewalled* versions of Youtube,
Twitter and the like but it just goes to show what sort of money can be
made from some sort of live blog or show streamed to the world.
>
> What I do find funny is that some of the clowns who paid out on you for
> not noticing CGI fakery are likely watching staged clickbait
> "restoration" videos believing they are real.
>
It's sometimes hard to tell where the reality ends and the fakes begin.
After all, Darren's *tales of achievements* looked credible enough, and
he sucked everyone in on aus.cars, until you started giving them closer
scrutiny. Then down they fell, one after another like a row of dominoes,
*lies, all lies*, every-single-one.

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On 26/02/2022 12:54 am, Clocky wrote:
> On 24/02/2022 9:56 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>> On 24/02/2022 5:35 pm, Daryl wrote:
>>> On 24/2/2022 5:17 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>>> On 24/02/2022 3:36 pm, Peter Jason wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 24 Feb 2022 15:08:13 +1100, Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au>
>>>>
>>>>>>> but what prevents those machines from flipping over? shirley
>>>>>>> it's not
>>>>>>> just the skill of the driver?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No wheelie bars visible so I guess it's all down to skill. ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>> Echually it's all about who pays the bill.
>>>>>
>>>>> Q: Who would dress like that and risk road injuries, bug bites,
>>>>> sun UV
>>>>> radiation, cold, heat, busted limbs and a sullied reputation???
>>>>>
>>>>> A: Because sugar daddy said so.
>>>>
>>>> That's extremely sexist of you. Stand by for a barrage of criticism
>>>> from the FLC about your misogynistic behaviour.
>>>>
>>>> Fucking idiot....
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> He's also completely wrong.
>>> People make money on Twitter and YouTube by having lots of
>>> "followers" or "subscribers" or "likes", the more followers and
>>> likes the more money they make from advertisers.
>>> No "sugar daddy" required, she dresses the way she does and takes
>>> risks because she makes money doing so, good luck to her.
>>> Some people make enough money from such things for it to be a very
>>> well paid full time job, some make $millions making "content".
>>>
>>>
>>
>> millions? i don't think so
>>
>
>
> Better believe it.

millions seems lot of money just from posting videos on youtube. if true
it's better than working at a job! how do you know ppl make that much?

>
> What I do find funny is that some of the clowns who paid out on you
> for not noticing CGI fakery are likely watching staged clickbait
> "restoration" videos believing they are real.
>
>

it's so hard to tell now if some videos on Instagram are real or not!

--
https://tinyurl.com/Yosemite-Sam
"His opinions have been crushed into insignificant dust by
the enormous weight of his lies"- Alvey on the Fraudster
"His self serving ego pumping comments just
read like witless wankery"- Clocky on Keefy

On 26/02/2022 1:03 pm, Xeno wrote:
> On 26/2/2022 12:54 am, Clocky wrote:
>> On 24/02/2022 9:56 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>> On 24/02/2022 5:35 pm, Daryl wrote:
>>>> On 24/2/2022 5:17 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>>>> On 24/02/2022 3:36 pm, Peter Jason wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, 24 Feb 2022 15:08:13 +1100, Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> but what prevents those machines from flipping over? shirley
>>>>>>>> it's not
>>>>>>>> just the skill of the driver?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No wheelie bars visible so I guess it's all down to skill. ;-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Echually it's all about who pays the bill.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Q: Who would dress like that and risk road injuries, bug bites,
>>>>>> sun UV
>>>>>> radiation, cold, heat, busted limbs and a sullied reputation???
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A: Because sugar daddy said so.
>>>>>
>>>>> That's extremely sexist of you. Stand by for a barrage of
>>>>> criticism from the FLC about your misogynistic behaviour.
>>>>>
>>>>> Fucking idiot....
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> He's also completely wrong.
>>>> People make money on Twitter and YouTube by having lots of
>>>> "followers" or "subscribers" or "likes", the more followers and
>>>> likes the more money they make from advertisers.
>>>> No "sugar daddy" required, she dresses the way she does and takes
>>>> risks because she makes money doing so, good luck to her.
>>>> Some people make enough money from such things for it to be a very
>>>> well paid full time job, some make $millions making "content".
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> millions? i don't think so
>>>
>>
>>
>> Better believe it.
>
> For sure! A lot of Chinese Youtubers are well into the multi-millions
> and recently had to pay tax on their earnings.
>
> https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-59732499
>
> https://www.businessinsider.com.au/china-livestreamers-rush-to-pay-back-taxes-amid-crackdown-2021-12
>

yikes!

>
> Of course they are using the Chinese *firewalled* versions of Youtube,
> Twitter and the like but it just goes to show what sort of money can
> be made from some sort of live blog or show streamed to the world.
>>
>> What I do find funny is that some of the clowns who paid out on you
>> for not noticing CGI fakery are likely watching staged clickbait
>> "restoration" videos believing they are real.
>>
> It's sometimes hard to tell where the reality ends and the fakes
> begin. After all, Darren's *tales of achievements* looked credible
> enough, and he sucked everyone in on aus.cars, until you started
> giving them closer scrutiny. Then down they fell, one after another
> like a row of dominoes, *lies, all lies*, every-single-one.

yep!

--
https://tinyurl.com/Yosemite-Sam
"His opinions have been crushed into insignificant dust by
the enormous weight of his lies"- Alvey on the Fraudster
"His self serving ego pumping comments just
read like witless wankery"- Clocky on Keefy

On 24/02/2022 6:05 pm, Daryl wrote:
> On 24/2/2022 6:40 pm, lindsay wrote:
>> On 24/02/2022 5:35 pm, Daryl wrote:
>>> On 24/2/2022 5:17 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>>> On 24/02/2022 3:36 pm, Peter Jason wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 24 Feb 2022 15:08:13 +1100, Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au>
>>>>
>>>>>>> but what prevents those machines from flipping over? shirley it's
>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>> just the skill of the driver?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No wheelie bars visible so I guess it's all down to skill.  ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>> Echually it's all about who pays the bill.
>>>>>
>>>>> Q: Who would dress like that and risk road injuries, bug bites, sun UV
>>>>> radiation, cold, heat, busted limbs and a sullied reputation???
>>>>>
>>>>> A: Because sugar daddy said so.
>>>>
>>>> That's extremely sexist of you. Stand by for a barrage of criticism
>>>> from the FLC about your misogynistic behaviour.
>>>>
>>>> Fucking idiot....
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> He's also completely wrong.
>>> People make money on Twitter and YouTube by having lots of
>>> "followers" or "subscribers" or "likes", the more followers and likes
>>> the more money they make from advertisers.
>>
>>
>> Yep. clickbait. Flash your tits and score $$$. Not unlike quite a few
>> females who are prepared to do whatever for "Onlyfans", Like former
>> Supercar driver Rennae Gracie.. and more recently, that fucking silly
>> bitch in Canberra who tried to drive around another car after a
>> verbal, and ended up stuck
>> https://www.facebook.com/100000568421467/videos/1098441494342647/
>> she's another slag who cant wait to get her pink bits out for a dollar
>> on onlyfans, publicity means so much.... no self esteem whatsoever.
>>
>>
>>> No "sugar daddy" required, she dresses the way she does and takes
>>> risks because she makes money doing so, good luck to her.
>>> Some people make enough money from such things for it to be a very
>>> well paid full time job, some make $millions making "content".
>>
>> Shudder.
>>>
>>>
>>
> I actually spend more time watching YouTube than TV Netflix etc, mostly
> car and aircraft related.
> People buying old planes that have been abandoned for very many years
> for next to nothing and try and get then back in the air, watched one
> today where someone bought a Cessna Citation private jet for US$1.00,
> looks like scrap to me so it will be interesting to see if he can make
> it fly again, all he needs is a lot of time and bucket loads of money:-)

HE might be able to turn a profit on it, there's a few hundred dollars
of aluminium in it, but fly again? There is an old joke about Irish
directions "If you want to get there you wouldn't start from here"

We were given a Beechcraft Starship in better condition than that, all
it needs is a pair of PT-6s (and probably a couple of hundred thou) to
get it going again.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/69/Beechcraft_Starship_fly-by.jpg/1920px-Beechcraft_Starship_fly-by.jpg

> There is a lot of rubbish content but there is also plenty that is
> excellent.
>

On 26/2/2022 2:32 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> On 24/02/2022 6:05 pm, Daryl wrote:
>> On 24/2/2022 6:40 pm, lindsay wrote:
>>> On 24/02/2022 5:35 pm, Daryl wrote:
>>>> On 24/2/2022 5:17 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>>>> On 24/02/2022 3:36 pm, Peter Jason wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, 24 Feb 2022 15:08:13 +1100, Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> but what prevents those machines from flipping over? shirley
>>>>>>>> it's not
>>>>>>>> just the skill of the driver?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No wheelie bars visible so I guess it's all down to skill.  ;-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Echually it's all about who pays the bill.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Q: Who would dress like that and risk road injuries, bug bites,
>>>>>> sun UV
>>>>>> radiation, cold, heat, busted limbs and a sullied reputation???
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A: Because sugar daddy said so.
>>>>>
>>>>> That's extremely sexist of you. Stand by for a barrage of criticism
>>>>> from the FLC about your misogynistic behaviour.
>>>>>
>>>>> Fucking idiot....
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> He's also completely wrong.
>>>> People make money on Twitter and YouTube by having lots of
>>>> "followers" or "subscribers" or "likes", the more followers and
>>>> likes the more money they make from advertisers.
>>>
>>>
>>> Yep. clickbait. Flash your tits and score $$$. Not unlike quite a few
>>> females who are prepared to do whatever for "Onlyfans", Like former
>>> Supercar driver Rennae Gracie.. and more recently, that fucking silly
>>> bitch in Canberra who tried to drive around another car after a
>>> verbal, and ended up stuck
>>> https://www.facebook.com/100000568421467/videos/1098441494342647/
>>> she's another slag who cant wait to get her pink bits out for a
>>> dollar on onlyfans, publicity means so much.... no self esteem
>>> whatsoever.
>>>
>>>
>>>> No "sugar daddy" required, she dresses the way she does and takes
>>>> risks because she makes money doing so, good luck to her.
>>>> Some people make enough money from such things for it to be a very
>>>> well paid full time job, some make $millions making "content".
>>>
>>> Shudder.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> I actually spend more time watching YouTube than TV Netflix etc,
>> mostly car and aircraft related.
>> People buying old planes that have been abandoned for very many years
>> for next to nothing and try and get then back in the air, watched one
>> today where someone bought a Cessna Citation private jet for US$1.00,
>> looks like scrap to me so it will be interesting to see if he can make
>> it fly again, all he needs is a lot of time and bucket loads of money:-)
>
> HE might be able to turn a profit on it, there's a few hundred dollars
> of aluminium in it, but fly again? There is an old joke about Irish
> directions "If you want to get there you wouldn't start from here"
>
> We were given a Beechcraft Starship in better condition than that, all
> it needs is a pair of PT-6s (and probably a couple of hundred thou) to
> get it going again.
>
> https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/69/Beechcraft_Starship_fly-by.jpg/1920px-Beechcraft_Starship_fly-by.jpg
>

LOL, I thought the same thing, with so many parts missing it would cost
a fortune to get it back in air, probably a lot more than its worth.
Don't know what his plan is but not doubt he will explain sooner or later.

--
Daryl

On 26/02/2022 10:38 am, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On 26/02/2022 12:54 am, Clocky wrote:
>> On 24/02/2022 9:56 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>> On 24/02/2022 5:35 pm, Daryl wrote:
>>>> On 24/2/2022 5:17 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>>>> On 24/02/2022 3:36 pm, Peter Jason wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, 24 Feb 2022 15:08:13 +1100, Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> but what prevents those machines from flipping over? shirley
>>>>>>>> it's not
>>>>>>>> just the skill of the driver?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No wheelie bars visible so I guess it's all down to skill. ;-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Echually it's all about who pays the bill.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Q: Who would dress like that and risk road injuries, bug bites,
>>>>>> sun UV
>>>>>> radiation, cold, heat, busted limbs and a sullied reputation???
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A: Because sugar daddy said so.
>>>>>
>>>>> That's extremely sexist of you. Stand by for a barrage of criticism
>>>>> from the FLC about your misogynistic behaviour.
>>>>>
>>>>> Fucking idiot....
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> He's also completely wrong.
>>>> People make money on Twitter and YouTube by having lots of
>>>> "followers" or "subscribers" or "likes", the more followers and
>>>> likes the more money they make from advertisers.
>>>> No "sugar daddy" required, she dresses the way she does and takes
>>>> risks because she makes money doing so, good luck to her.
>>>> Some people make enough money from such things for it to be a very
>>>> well paid full time job, some make $millions making "content".
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> millions? i don't think so
>>>
>>
>>
>> Better believe it.
>
>
> millions seems lot of money just from posting videos on youtube. if true
> it's better than working at a job! how do you know ppl make that much?
>
>

https://influencermarketinghub.com/pewdiepie-net-worth/

>>
>> What I do find funny is that some of the clowns who paid out on you
>> for not noticing CGI fakery are likely watching staged clickbait
>> "restoration" videos believing they are real.
>>
>>
>
> it's so hard to tell now if some videos on Instagram are real or not!
>
>