On Saturday, September 4, 2021 at 8:10:07 AM UTC+1, FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer wrote:
> On 9/3/2021 10:57 PM, Donald Trump wrote:
> > In article <aZCYI.15309$2Q_3...@fx35.iad>
> >
> > Flush.
> >
> https://quotefancy.com/quote/1275842/Henry-Kissinger-To-be-an-enemy-of-America-can-be-dangerous-but-to-be-a-friend-is-fatal
>
>
> “To be an enemy of America can be dangerous, but to be a friend is fatal.”
> — Henry Kissinger
>
>
>
>
> Whites themselves should NEVER TRUST their fellow WHITES.
>
>
> WHITES should NEVER TRUST their fellow white neighbors, community
> leaders, pastors, mom and pop store owners BECAUSE they could be one of
> the 100,000 NSA agents and 50,000 FBI Cointelpro agents who put them
> under "MIND SURVEILLANCE and RECORDING everything in NSA Supercomputers
> for the last 70 years."
>
>
>
> Amrikkkan WHITE FILTH backstabbed Kurds
>
> Amrikkkan WHITE FILTH backstabbed Afghanis and let Taliban take over
>
> Amrikkkan WHITE FILTH backstabbed Iraqis
>
> Amrikkkan WHITE FILTH backstab EVERYBODY because WHITES are a PURE EVIL
> VIRUS which can NEVER BE TRUSTED.
> DUMB fucking Slavish NAIVE Indians DON'T UNDERSTAND even the BASICS of
> the EVIL Amrikkkkan WHITE CHRISTIAN VIRUS and how the EVIL Amrikkkan
> white FILTH are "USING India to FIGHT China" while MAKING TRILLIONS from
> India and simultaneously BACKSTABBING and DESTROYING India quietly like
> CANCER.
>
> NAIVE fucking Indians don't understand that they have to FOCUS on "EVIL
> WHITE FILTH's ACTIONS and NOT WORDS".
>
> Whites are an "INFINITELY DECEPTIVE RACE".
>
> You can TRUST A SNAKE but you can NEVER TRUST a WHITE.
>
> Smile, Shake Hands and Back Stab == EVIL White Christian RACE.
>
> =========================================================================
>
>
> https://www.rt.com/op-ed/533574-us-india-allies-against-china/
>
> For the US, India is little more than a pawn to be deployed against
> China – not a nation to be respected on its own terms
>
> 31 Aug, 2021 18:12
>
>
> The US is desperate to recruit allies in its hybrid war against China,
> and highly covets New Delhi - which has its own issues with Beijing - as
> a useful partner. So why is Washington so unhelpful and discourteous to
> its ally?
>
> Friends with benefits
>
> It is often said that the US has no permanent allies – only permanent
> interests. Allies come and allies go, but US national interest (i.e.
> global hegemony) remains paramount. All relationships are transactional
> – an ally is only as good as the geopolitical benefits they bring.. The
> US regime makes friends and enemies based on strategic concerns alone,
> and with little concern for morality.
>
> ‘Please Go On’ with new conflicts: Washington war hawk John Bolton calls
> for pressure on Pakistan amid Afghanistan disaster ‘Please Go On’ with
> new conflicts: Washington war hawk John Bolton calls for pressure on
> Pakistan amid Afghanistan disaster
>
> US diplomats are trained to rely on a combination of cold, hard,
> strategic calculations and ruthless deal-making. While all nations have
> elements of realism in their geopolitical calculus, few can bring
> themselves to abandon morality and ethics on the scale that the US does.
> While other nations may be guided at least partially by human values –
> say, whether their decisions will lead to civilian deaths – US leaders
> are unconcerned by such trivialities. US bureaucrats are determined to
> get the job done and serve US hegemony – no matter the number of
> murdered children or destroyed cities they leave in their wake.
>
> In essence, the foreign policy of the US regime – and indeed, that of
> most western regimes from Britain to Nazi Germany – is merely a
> reflection of western values: institutionalized racism, a willingness to
> commit military aggression and even genocide to achieve goals, an
> unbridled nihilism disguised as vacuous optimism, a constant mistrust of
> others, an inability to appreciate differences, and a civilizational
> affinity for hypocrisy and deception.
>
> Thus, it is not surprising that few nations violate international law
> more than the US. Even less surprising is that few nations lecture other
> nations on violating international law more than the US – the nation
> that violates them the most, often even violating its own laws. The
> regime has little respect for the rules-based international order – it
> has been breaking its promises and treaties for centuries. As Henry
> Kissinger, one of America’s most murderous Secretaries of State, whose
> wit was outmatched only by his sadism, once put it: “The illegal we do
> immediately, the unconstitutional takes a little longer.”
>
> For the US regime, allies are dispensable – it can always buy new
> friends. Thus, Saddam Hussein was once a close ally, until one day he
> wasn’t, and the US decided to kill him. And then there is the case of
> the Taliban, a murderous group once heavily financed and supported by
> the US itself, that ironically defeated the US in its invasion of
> Afghanistan. In the 80s, the US funded the Afghan Mujahideen against the
> Soviets, propping up leaders like Osama Bin Laden, providing them with
> generous amounts of weapons, money and training. Then, in one of the
> most amusing U-turns and blowbacks in modern history, these same
> “terrorist” groups turned around to bite the hand that fed them, killing
> around 3,000 Americans in an attack on US soil on September 11, 2001, as
> revenge for decades of US wars and bombings and genocidal sanctions in
> their countries that killed millions.
>
>
> And now, India
>
> For a nation that literally exists because Europeans were desperate to
> find a sea route to the richest country in the world at the time, the
> average American knows little about India - apart from the occasional
> yoga reference or jokes about the Kama Sutra. One similarity between the
> average white American and Christopher Columbus – apart from the fact
> that both benefited from genocide and slavery – is the inability to find
> India on a map.
>
> Even US policymakers harbor little respect for India. In Washington’s
> policy-making circles, Indophobic hate and caricatures are common. Nixon
> proclaimed that India needed a “mass famine,” while Kissinger declared
> that Indians were “bastards.” Yet, that was the 1970s, at the height of
> the Cold War. Today, the US sees India as a nation with three main uses:
>
> 1) An important hedge against China
>
> 2) An important market for US weapons
>
> 3) An important market for US consumer goods, a source of profits, and
> an outsourcing hub
>
> The relationship between India and the US today is far warmer than
> during the Nixon era. China has brought the two countries closer than
> ever before – regardless of the hateful attitudes US bureaucrats no
> doubt harbor even today, like their predecessors. Racist hatred often
> takes a backseat to geopolitical realities.
>
> The enemy of my enemy
>
> In 2020, a bitter dispute broke out between India and China over their
> undemarcated border. A brawl ensued between the two militaries – which
> led to casualties on both sides.
>
> America pounced. It wasted no time trying to exploit the fresh
> differences between India and China for its own anti-Beijing agenda. US
> officials publicly linked China’s actions on the Indian border with its
> “aggression” in the South China Sea, seeking to portray a pattern of
> Chinese belligerence (while itself hosting 800 military bases around the
> globe). US leader Donald Trump even offered to mediate between the two –
> a highly resistible offer that both nations sensibly refused.
>
> Yet, India enjoyed the attention America showered on it. The “Quad” – an
> anti-China grouping consisting of the US, Japan, Australia, and India –
> was revived. India had been its most reluctant member until then, but
> now agreed to take it further. India had become America’s new trophy wife.
>
> Pawns and power
>
> Yet, old habits die hard. The desire to prop up India as a hedge against
> China pushed back against supremacist American attitudes. Hegemons do
> not usually learn to respect other nations this quickly.
>
> Take the recent Covid-19 pandemic, for example. When India was
> desperately in need of vaccines and medical equipment during its
> devastating second wave, the US regime – despite hoarding a surplus of
> vaccines, and despite having accepted assistance from India in its own
> time of need – refused to help. It would rather let vaccines expire than
> send them abroad – even to an ally whose friendship it so highly flaunts.
>
> Eventually, after receiving much criticism from its own politicians and
> pundits, it finally acquiesced. That the regime helped a highly coveted
> partner only after a massive outcry shows how much importance it really
> gives to India. The delayed about-turn was merely a belated attempt to
> salvage its reputation, not some genuine desire to help an ally.
>
> Another recent incident exposed America’s true colors further still. The
> US regime frequently orders its navy to conduct “Freedom of Navigation”
> (FONOPs) operations in the South China Sea, the geopolitical equivalent
> of gorilla-style chest thumping to prove its superiority over China.
> America says the operations are consistent with “international law.”
> Surprisingly, the US navy recently did the same to India, intruding into
> its Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) without permission. The US regime’s
> 7th Fleet openly snubbed India, boasting that it “asserted navigational
> rights and freedoms…inside India’s exclusive economic zone, without
> requesting India’s prior consent…” The statement even called India’s
> maritime claims “excessive.”
>
> This language was similar to what the US regime uses towards China. This
> implicit equivalence between India and China shocked many, as it came on
> the heels of the regime seeking a closer relationship with New Delhi to
> counter the rising power.
>
> The ultimate irony is that the US is yet to ratify UNCLOS – the United
> Nations Convention of the Law of the Sea – the “international law” it is
> referring to. Few things are more typically American than violating
> other nations' laws by touting “international law” while itself refusing
> to ratify the same international law that it enforces.
>
>
> If the US is so callous towards India, other western nations are not far
> behind. The EU recently refused to recognize the Indian manufactured
> version of the AstraZeneca/Oxford vaccine (known as “Covishield”) in its
> ‘Green pass’ vaccine certification scheme, which allows travel into the
> region without mandatory quarantine. This is despite the Indian version
> being biochemically identical to the European one – it’s technically the
> same vaccine, just manufactured in India. When India pushed back and
> threatened mandatory quarantine for EU arrivals too, 15 EU nations
> relented. Bullies often understand only the language of bullying.
>
> Another test will be how the US behaves over India’s recent procurement
> of Russia’s S-400 missile defense system. The regime has previously
> sanctioned Turkey and China for purchasing S-400s. Whether it will
> sanction India too when deliveries start at the end of the year remains
> an open question. If it does, it will be one more indication that India
> is just a pawn for the US in its geopolitical games with China. If it
> doesn’t, it will prove that US anti-Russian sanctions are simply wielded
> by the regime on a whim to nations it doesn’t like. America will call
> its own bluff – regardless of which path it chooses.
>
> Hedging and hybrid wars
>
> Incident by incident, evidence is mounting that the US regime has little
> intention of treating India as a nation on its own terms, but merely to
> use it as just another dispensable front in its hybrid war against
> China. Still, while India and other countries caught in the crossfire
> may be too smart to agree to every US demand (Vietnam also recently
> snubbed the US), they are all relishing the attention.
>
> In its search for allies to counter China’s rise, the US often comes
> bearing gifts, many of them genuine. The best strategy for India would
> be to benefit from the new US-China Great Game and play the two against
> each other. After all, until you can become a superpower yourself (as
> you were for the better part of the last 2,000 years), the next best
> thing is to benefit from superpower rivalry.

On Saturday, September 4, 2021 at 8:27:40 AM UTC+1, RH wrote:
> On Saturday, September 4, 2021 at 8:10:07 AM UTC+1, FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer wrote:
> > On 9/3/2021 10:57 PM, Donald Trump wrote:
> > > In article <aZCYI.15309$2Q_3...@fx35.iad>
> > >
> > > Flush.
> > >
> > https://quotefancy.com/quote/1275842/Henry-Kissinger-To-be-an-enemy-of-America-can-be-dangerous-but-to-be-a-friend-is-fatal
> >
> >
> > “To be an enemy of America can be dangerous, but to be a friend is fatal.”
> > — Henry Kissinger
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Whites themselves should NEVER TRUST their fellow WHITES.
> >
> >
> > WHITES should NEVER TRUST their fellow white neighbors, community
> > leaders, pastors, mom and pop store owners BECAUSE they could be one of
> > the 100,000 NSA agents and 50,000 FBI Cointelpro agents who put them
> > under "MIND SURVEILLANCE and RECORDING everything in NSA Supercomputers
> > for the last 70 years."
> >
> >
> >
> > Amrikkkan WHITE FILTH backstabbed Kurds
> >
> > Amrikkkan WHITE FILTH backstabbed Afghanis and let Taliban take over
> >
> > Amrikkkan WHITE FILTH backstabbed Iraqis
> >
> > Amrikkkan WHITE FILTH backstab EVERYBODY because WHITES are a PURE EVIL
> > VIRUS which can NEVER BE TRUSTED.
> > DUMB fucking Slavish NAIVE Indians DON'T UNDERSTAND even the BASICS of
> > the EVIL Amrikkkkan WHITE CHRISTIAN VIRUS and how the EVIL Amrikkkan
> > white FILTH are "USING India to FIGHT China" while MAKING TRILLIONS from
> > India and simultaneously BACKSTABBING and DESTROYING India quietly like
> > CANCER.
> >
> > NAIVE fucking Indians don't understand that they have to FOCUS on "EVIL
> > WHITE FILTH's ACTIONS and NOT WORDS".
> >
> > Whites are an "INFINITELY DECEPTIVE RACE".
> >
> > You can TRUST A SNAKE but you can NEVER TRUST a WHITE.
> >
> > Smile, Shake Hands and Back Stab == EVIL White Christian RACE.
> >
> > =========================================================================
> >
> >
> > https://www.rt.com/op-ed/533574-us-india-allies-against-china/
> >
> > For the US, India is little more than a pawn to be deployed against
> > China – not a nation to be respected on its own terms
> >
> > 31 Aug, 2021 18:12
> >
> >
> > The US is desperate to recruit allies in its hybrid war against China,
> > and highly covets New Delhi - which has its own issues with Beijing - as
> > a useful partner. So why is Washington so unhelpful and discourteous to
> > its ally?
> >
> > Friends with benefits
> >
> > It is often said that the US has no permanent allies – only permanent
> > interests. Allies come and allies go, but US national interest (i.e.
> > global hegemony) remains paramount. All relationships are transactional
> > – an ally is only as good as the geopolitical benefits they bring. The
> > US regime makes friends and enemies based on strategic concerns alone,
> > and with little concern for morality.
> >
> > ‘Please Go On’ with new conflicts: Washington war hawk John Bolton calls
> > for pressure on Pakistan amid Afghanistan disaster ‘Please Go On’ with
> > new conflicts: Washington war hawk John Bolton calls for pressure on
> > Pakistan amid Afghanistan disaster
> >
> > US diplomats are trained to rely on a combination of cold, hard,
> > strategic calculations and ruthless deal-making. While all nations have
> > elements of realism in their geopolitical calculus, few can bring
> > themselves to abandon morality and ethics on the scale that the US does..
> > While other nations may be guided at least partially by human values –
> > say, whether their decisions will lead to civilian deaths – US leaders
> > are unconcerned by such trivialities. US bureaucrats are determined to
> > get the job done and serve US hegemony – no matter the number of
> > murdered children or destroyed cities they leave in their wake.
> >
> > In essence, the foreign policy of the US regime – and indeed, that of
> > most western regimes from Britain to Nazi Germany – is merely a
> > reflection of western values: institutionalized racism, a willingness to
> > commit military aggression and even genocide to achieve goals, an
> > unbridled nihilism disguised as vacuous optimism, a constant mistrust of
> > others, an inability to appreciate differences, and a civilizational
> > affinity for hypocrisy and deception.
> >
> > Thus, it is not surprising that few nations violate international law
> > more than the US. Even less surprising is that few nations lecture other
> > nations on violating international law more than the US – the nation
> > that violates them the most, often even violating its own laws. The
> > regime has little respect for the rules-based international order – it
> > has been breaking its promises and treaties for centuries. As Henry
> > Kissinger, one of America’s most murderous Secretaries of State, whose
> > wit was outmatched only by his sadism, once put it: “The illegal we do
> > immediately, the unconstitutional takes a little longer.”
> >
> > For the US regime, allies are dispensable – it can always buy new
> > friends. Thus, Saddam Hussein was once a close ally, until one day he
> > wasn’t, and the US decided to kill him. And then there is the case of
> > the Taliban, a murderous group once heavily financed and supported by
> > the US itself, that ironically defeated the US in its invasion of
> > Afghanistan. In the 80s, the US funded the Afghan Mujahideen against the
> > Soviets, propping up leaders like Osama Bin Laden, providing them with
> > generous amounts of weapons, money and training. Then, in one of the
> > most amusing U-turns and blowbacks in modern history, these same
> > “terrorist” groups turned around to bite the hand that fed them, killing
> > around 3,000 Americans in an attack on US soil on September 11, 2001, as
> > revenge for decades of US wars and bombings and genocidal sanctions in
> > their countries that killed millions.
> >
> >
> > And now, India
> >
> > For a nation that literally exists because Europeans were desperate to
> > find a sea route to the richest country in the world at the time, the
> > average American knows little about India - apart from the occasional
> > yoga reference or jokes about the Kama Sutra. One similarity between the
> > average white American and Christopher Columbus – apart from the fact
> > that both benefited from genocide and slavery – is the inability to find
> > India on a map.
> >
> > Even US policymakers harbor little respect for India. In Washington’s
> > policy-making circles, Indophobic hate and caricatures are common. Nixon
> > proclaimed that India needed a “mass famine,” while Kissinger declared
> > that Indians were “bastards.” Yet, that was the 1970s, at the height of
> > the Cold War. Today, the US sees India as a nation with three main uses:
> >
> > 1) An important hedge against China
> >
> > 2) An important market for US weapons
> >
> > 3) An important market for US consumer goods, a source of profits, and
> > an outsourcing hub
> >
> > The relationship between India and the US today is far warmer than
> > during the Nixon era. China has brought the two countries closer than
> > ever before – regardless of the hateful attitudes US bureaucrats no
> > doubt harbor even today, like their predecessors. Racist hatred often
> > takes a backseat to geopolitical realities.
> >
> > The enemy of my enemy
> >
> > In 2020, a bitter dispute broke out between India and China over their
> > undemarcated border. A brawl ensued between the two militaries – which
> > led to casualties on both sides.
> >
> > America pounced. It wasted no time trying to exploit the fresh
> > differences between India and China for its own anti-Beijing agenda. US
> > officials publicly linked China’s actions on the Indian border with its
> > “aggression” in the South China Sea, seeking to portray a pattern of
> > Chinese belligerence (while itself hosting 800 military bases around the
> > globe). US leader Donald Trump even offered to mediate between the two –
> > a highly resistible offer that both nations sensibly refused.
> >
> > Yet, India enjoyed the attention America showered on it. The “Quad” – an
> > anti-China grouping consisting of the US, Japan, Australia, and India –
> > was revived. India had been its most reluctant member until then, but
> > now agreed to take it further. India had become America’s new trophy wife.
> >
> > Pawns and power
> >
> > Yet, old habits die hard. The desire to prop up India as a hedge against
> > China pushed back against supremacist American attitudes. Hegemons do
> > not usually learn to respect other nations this quickly.
> >
> > Take the recent Covid-19 pandemic, for example. When India was
> > desperately in need of vaccines and medical equipment during its
> > devastating second wave, the US regime – despite hoarding a surplus of
> > vaccines, and despite having accepted assistance from India in its own
> > time of need – refused to help. It would rather let vaccines expire than
> > send them abroad – even to an ally whose friendship it so highly flaunts.
> >
> > Eventually, after receiving much criticism from its own politicians and
> > pundits, it finally acquiesced. That the regime helped a highly coveted
> > partner only after a massive outcry shows how much importance it really
> > gives to India. The delayed about-turn was merely a belated attempt to
> > salvage its reputation, not some genuine desire to help an ally.
> >
> > Another recent incident exposed America’s true colors further still. The
> > US regime frequently orders its navy to conduct “Freedom of Navigation”
> > (FONOPs) operations in the South China Sea, the geopolitical equivalent
> > of gorilla-style chest thumping to prove its superiority over China.
> > America says the operations are consistent with “international law.”
> > Surprisingly, the US navy recently did the same to India, intruding into
> > its Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) without permission. The US regime’s
> > 7th Fleet openly snubbed India, boasting that it “asserted navigational
> > rights and freedoms…inside India’s exclusive economic zone, without
> > requesting India’s prior consent…” The statement even called India’s
> > maritime claims “excessive.”
> >
> > This language was similar to what the US regime uses towards China. This
> > implicit equivalence between India and China shocked many, as it came on
> > the heels of the regime seeking a closer relationship with New Delhi to
> > counter the rising power.
> >
> > The ultimate irony is that the US is yet to ratify UNCLOS – the United
> > Nations Convention of the Law of the Sea – the “international law” it is
> > referring to. Few things are more typically American than violating
> > other nations' laws by touting “international law” while itself refusing
> > to ratify the same international law that it enforces.
> >
> >
> > If the US is so callous towards India, other western nations are not far
> > behind. The EU recently refused to recognize the Indian manufactured
> > version of the AstraZeneca/Oxford vaccine (known as “Covishield”) in its
> > ‘Green pass’ vaccine certification scheme, which allows travel into the
> > region without mandatory quarantine. This is despite the Indian version
> > being biochemically identical to the European one – it’s technically the
> > same vaccine, just manufactured in India. When India pushed back and
> > threatened mandatory quarantine for EU arrivals too, 15 EU nations
> > relented. Bullies often understand only the language of bullying.
> >
> > Another test will be how the US behaves over India’s recent procurement
> > of Russia’s S-400 missile defense system. The regime has previously
> > sanctioned Turkey and China for purchasing S-400s. Whether it will
> > sanction India too when deliveries start at the end of the year remains
> > an open question. If it does, it will be one more indication that India
> > is just a pawn for the US in its geopolitical games with China. If it
> > doesn’t, it will prove that US anti-Russian sanctions are simply wielded
> > by the regime on a whim to nations it doesn’t like. America will call
> > its own bluff – regardless of which path it chooses.
> >
> > Hedging and hybrid wars
> >
> > Incident by incident, evidence is mounting that the US regime has little
> > intention of treating India as a nation on its own terms, but merely to
> > use it as just another dispensable front in its hybrid war against
> > China. Still, while India and other countries caught in the crossfire
> > may be too smart to agree to every US demand (Vietnam also recently
> > snubbed the US), they are all relishing the attention.
> >
> > In its search for allies to counter China’s rise, the US often comes
> > bearing gifts, many of them genuine. The best strategy for India would
> > be to benefit from the new US-China Great Game and play the two against
> > each other. After all, until you can become a superpower yourself (as
> > you were for the better part of the last 2,000 years), the next best
> > thing is to benefit from superpower rivalry.
> "Doesn't the patient realises that India is not a country but a geographical expression , doctor..." RH
"I'm afraid he doesn't, nurse, despite the fact that his " Muslim and Hindu "fellow" citizens have bouts of murdering one another... RH

On Saturday, September 4, 2021 at 10:03:53 AM UTC+1, FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer wrote:
> On 9/4/2021 1:46 AM, RH wrote:
> > On Saturday, September 4, 2021 at 8:27:40 AM UTC+1, RH wrote:
> >> On Saturday, September 4, 2021 at 8:10:07 AM UTC+1, FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer wrote:
> >>> On 9/3/2021 10:57 PM, Donald Trump wrote:
> >>>> In article <aZCYI.15309$2Q_3...@fx35.iad>
> >>>>
> >>>> Flush.
> >>>>
> >>> https://quotefancy.com/quote/1275842/Henry-Kissinger-To-be-an-enemy-of-America-can-be-dangerous-but-to-be-a-friend-is-fatal
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> “To be an enemy of America can be dangerous, but to be a friend is fatal.”
> >>> — Henry Kissinger
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Whites themselves should NEVER TRUST their fellow WHITES.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> WHITES should NEVER TRUST their fellow white neighbors, community
> >>> leaders, pastors, mom and pop store owners BECAUSE they could be one of
> >>> the 100,000 NSA agents and 50,000 FBI Cointelpro agents who put them
> >>> under "MIND SURVEILLANCE and RECORDING everything in NSA Supercomputers
> >>> for the last 70 years."
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Amrikkkan WHITE FILTH backstabbed Kurds
> >>>
> >>> Amrikkkan WHITE FILTH backstabbed Afghanis and let Taliban take over
> >>>
> >>> Amrikkkan WHITE FILTH backstabbed Iraqis
> >>>
> >>> Amrikkkan WHITE FILTH backstab EVERYBODY because WHITES are a PURE EVIL
> >>> VIRUS which can NEVER BE TRUSTED.
> >>> DUMB fucking Slavish NAIVE Indians DON'T UNDERSTAND even the BASICS of
> >>> the EVIL Amrikkkkan WHITE CHRISTIAN VIRUS and how the EVIL Amrikkkan
> >>> white FILTH are "USING India to FIGHT China" while MAKING TRILLIONS from
> >>> India and simultaneously BACKSTABBING and DESTROYING India quietly like
> >>> CANCER.
> >>>
> >>> NAIVE fucking Indians don't understand that they have to FOCUS on "EVIL
> >>> WHITE FILTH's ACTIONS and NOT WORDS".
> >>>
> >>> Whites are an "INFINITELY DECEPTIVE RACE".
> >>>
> >>> You can TRUST A SNAKE but you can NEVER TRUST a WHITE.
> >>>
> >>> Smile, Shake Hands and Back Stab == EVIL White Christian RACE.
> >>>
> >>> =========================================================================
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> https://www.rt.com/op-ed/533574-us-india-allies-against-china/
> >>>
> >>> For the US, India is little more than a pawn to be deployed against
> >>> China – not a nation to be respected on its own terms
> >>>
> >>> 31 Aug, 2021 18:12
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> The US is desperate to recruit allies in its hybrid war against China,
> >>> and highly covets New Delhi - which has its own issues with Beijing - as
> >>> a useful partner. So why is Washington so unhelpful and discourteous to
> >>> its ally?
> >>>
> >>> Friends with benefits
> >>>
> >>> It is often said that the US has no permanent allies – only permanent
> >>> interests. Allies come and allies go, but US national interest (i.e.
> >>> global hegemony) remains paramount. All relationships are transactional
> >>> – an ally is only as good as the geopolitical benefits they bring. The
> >>> US regime makes friends and enemies based on strategic concerns alone,
> >>> and with little concern for morality.
> >>>
> >>> ‘Please Go On’ with new conflicts: Washington war hawk John Bolton calls
> >>> for pressure on Pakistan amid Afghanistan disaster ‘Please Go On’ with
> >>> new conflicts: Washington war hawk John Bolton calls for pressure on
> >>> Pakistan amid Afghanistan disaster
> >>>
> >>> US diplomats are trained to rely on a combination of cold, hard,
> >>> strategic calculations and ruthless deal-making. While all nations have
> >>> elements of realism in their geopolitical calculus, few can bring
> >>> themselves to abandon morality and ethics on the scale that the US does.
> >>> While other nations may be guided at least partially by human values –
> >>> say, whether their decisions will lead to civilian deaths – US leaders
> >>> are unconcerned by such trivialities. US bureaucrats are determined to
> >>> get the job done and serve US hegemony – no matter the number of
> >>> murdered children or destroyed cities they leave in their wake.
> >>>
> >>> In essence, the foreign policy of the US regime – and indeed, that of
> >>> most western regimes from Britain to Nazi Germany – is merely a
> >>> reflection of western values: institutionalized racism, a willingness to
> >>> commit military aggression and even genocide to achieve goals, an
> >>> unbridled nihilism disguised as vacuous optimism, a constant mistrust of
> >>> others, an inability to appreciate differences, and a civilizational
> >>> affinity for hypocrisy and deception.
> >>>
> >>> Thus, it is not surprising that few nations violate international law
> >>> more than the US. Even less surprising is that few nations lecture other
> >>> nations on violating international law more than the US – the nation
> >>> that violates them the most, often even violating its own laws. The
> >>> regime has little respect for the rules-based international order – it
> >>> has been breaking its promises and treaties for centuries. As Henry
> >>> Kissinger, one of America’s most murderous Secretaries of State, whose
> >>> wit was outmatched only by his sadism, once put it: “The illegal we do
> >>> immediately, the unconstitutional takes a little longer.”
> >>>
> >>> For the US regime, allies are dispensable – it can always buy new
> >>> friends. Thus, Saddam Hussein was once a close ally, until one day he
> >>> wasn’t, and the US decided to kill him. And then there is the case of
> >>> the Taliban, a murderous group once heavily financed and supported by
> >>> the US itself, that ironically defeated the US in its invasion of
> >>> Afghanistan. In the 80s, the US funded the Afghan Mujahideen against the
> >>> Soviets, propping up leaders like Osama Bin Laden, providing them with
> >>> generous amounts of weapons, money and training. Then, in one of the
> >>> most amusing U-turns and blowbacks in modern history, these same
> >>> “terrorist” groups turned around to bite the hand that fed them, killing
> >>> around 3,000 Americans in an attack on US soil on September 11, 2001, as
> >>> revenge for decades of US wars and bombings and genocidal sanctions in
> >>> their countries that killed millions.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> And now, India
> >>>
> >>> For a nation that literally exists because Europeans were desperate to
> >>> find a sea route to the richest country in the world at the time, the
> >>> average American knows little about India - apart from the occasional
> >>> yoga reference or jokes about the Kama Sutra. One similarity between the
> >>> average white American and Christopher Columbus – apart from the fact
> >>> that both benefited from genocide and slavery – is the inability to find
> >>> India on a map.
> >>>
> >>> Even US policymakers harbor little respect for India. In Washington’s
> >>> policy-making circles, Indophobic hate and caricatures are common. Nixon
> >>> proclaimed that India needed a “mass famine,” while Kissinger declared
> >>> that Indians were “bastards.” Yet, that was the 1970s, at the height of
> >>> the Cold War. Today, the US sees India as a nation with three main uses:
> >>>
> >>> 1) An important hedge against China
> >>>
> >>> 2) An important market for US weapons
> >>>
> >>> 3) An important market for US consumer goods, a source of profits, and
> >>> an outsourcing hub
> >>>
> >>> The relationship between India and the US today is far warmer than
> >>> during the Nixon era. China has brought the two countries closer than
> >>> ever before – regardless of the hateful attitudes US bureaucrats no
> >>> doubt harbor even today, like their predecessors. Racist hatred often
> >>> takes a backseat to geopolitical realities.
> >>>
> >>> The enemy of my enemy
> >>>
> >>> In 2020, a bitter dispute broke out between India and China over their
> >>> undemarcated border. A brawl ensued between the two militaries – which
> >>> led to casualties on both sides.
> >>>
> >>> America pounced. It wasted no time trying to exploit the fresh
> >>> differences between India and China for its own anti-Beijing agenda. US
> >>> officials publicly linked China’s actions on the Indian border with its
> >>> “aggression” in the South China Sea, seeking to portray a pattern of
> >>> Chinese belligerence (while itself hosting 800 military bases around the
> >>> globe). US leader Donald Trump even offered to mediate between the two –
> >>> a highly resistible offer that both nations sensibly refused.
> >>>
> >>> Yet, India enjoyed the attention America showered on it. The “Quad” – an
> >>> anti-China grouping consisting of the US, Japan, Australia, and India –
> >>> was revived. India had been its most reluctant member until then, but
> >>> now agreed to take it further. India had become America’s new trophy wife.
> >>>
> >>> Pawns and power
> >>>
> >>> Yet, old habits die hard. The desire to prop up India as a hedge against
> >>> China pushed back against supremacist American attitudes. Hegemons do
> >>> not usually learn to respect other nations this quickly.
> >>>
> >>> Take the recent Covid-19 pandemic, for example. When India was
> >>> desperately in need of vaccines and medical equipment during its
> >>> devastating second wave, the US regime – despite hoarding a surplus of
> >>> vaccines, and despite having accepted assistance from India in its own
> >>> time of need – refused to help. It would rather let vaccines expire than
> >>> send them abroad – even to an ally whose friendship it so highly flaunts.
> >>>
> >>> Eventually, after receiving much criticism from its own politicians and
> >>> pundits, it finally acquiesced. That the regime helped a highly coveted
> >>> partner only after a massive outcry shows how much importance it really
> >>> gives to India. The delayed about-turn was merely a belated attempt to
> >>> salvage its reputation, not some genuine desire to help an ally.
> >>>
> >>> Another recent incident exposed America’s true colors further still. The
> >>> US regime frequently orders its navy to conduct “Freedom of Navigation”
> >>> (FONOPs) operations in the South China Sea, the geopolitical equivalent
> >>> of gorilla-style chest thumping to prove its superiority over China.
> >>> America says the operations are consistent with “international law.”
> >>> Surprisingly, the US navy recently did the same to India, intruding into
> >>> its Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) without permission. The US regime’s
> >>> 7th Fleet openly snubbed India, boasting that it “asserted navigational
> >>> rights and freedoms…inside India’s exclusive economic zone, without
> >>> requesting India’s prior consent…” The statement even called India’s
> >>> maritime claims “excessive.”
> >>>
> >>> This language was similar to what the US regime uses towards China. This
> >>> implicit equivalence between India and China shocked many, as it came on
> >>> the heels of the regime seeking a closer relationship with New Delhi to
> >>> counter the rising power.
> >>>
> >>> The ultimate irony is that the US is yet to ratify UNCLOS – the United
> >>> Nations Convention of the Law of the Sea – the “international law” it is
> >>> referring to. Few things are more typically American than violating
> >>> other nations' laws by touting “international law” while itself refusing
> >>> to ratify the same international law that it enforces.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> If the US is so callous towards India, other western nations are not far
> >>> behind. The EU recently refused to recognize the Indian manufactured
> >>> version of the AstraZeneca/Oxford vaccine (known as “Covishield”) in its
> >>> ‘Green pass’ vaccine certification scheme, which allows travel into the
> >>> region without mandatory quarantine. This is despite the Indian version
> >>> being biochemically identical to the European one – it’s technically the
> >>> same vaccine, just manufactured in India. When India pushed back and
> >>> threatened mandatory quarantine for EU arrivals too, 15 EU nations
> >>> relented. Bullies often understand only the language of bullying.
> >>>
> >>> Another test will be how the US behaves over India’s recent procurement
> >>> of Russia’s S-400 missile defense system. The regime has previously
> >>> sanctioned Turkey and China for purchasing S-400s. Whether it will
> >>> sanction India too when deliveries start at the end of the year remains
> >>> an open question. If it does, it will be one more indication that India
> >>> is just a pawn for the US in its geopolitical games with China. If it
> >>> doesn’t, it will prove that US anti-Russian sanctions are simply wielded
> >>> by the regime on a whim to nations it doesn’t like. America will call
> >>> its own bluff – regardless of which path it chooses.
> >>>
> >>> Hedging and hybrid wars
> >>>
> >>> Incident by incident, evidence is mounting that the US regime has little
> >>> intention of treating India as a nation on its own terms, but merely to
> >>> use it as just another dispensable front in its hybrid war against
> >>> China. Still, while India and other countries caught in the crossfire
> >>> may be too smart to agree to every US demand (Vietnam also recently
> >>> snubbed the US), they are all relishing the attention.
> >>>
> >>> In its search for allies to counter China’s rise, the US often comes
> >>> bearing gifts, many of them genuine. The best strategy for India would
> >>> be to benefit from the new US-China Great Game and play the two against
> >>> each other. After all, until you can become a superpower yourself (as
> >>> you were for the better part of the last 2,000 years), the next best
> >>> thing is to benefit from superpower rivalry.
> >> "Doesn't the patient realises that India is not a country but a geographical expression , doctor..." RH
> > "I'm afraid he doesn't, nurse, despite the fact that his " Muslim and Hindu "fellow" citizens have bouts of murdering one another... RH