On Wednesday, October 6, 2021 at 2:34:11 PM UTC+1, FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer wrote:
> Whites don't understand that REALITY is, actually 1000 times WORSE than
> what Greenwald explained in his column.
>
> KENT WILLS with email id compuelf at gmail.com and the other secret
> society psychopaths Bill Pollock aka Muriel McKay aka Loughall Tomartyr
> or whatever name it calls itself with email id tsp2opt at gmail.com, to
> name a few who infest these newsgroups.
>
> =============================================================================
>
> https://theintercept.com/2014/02/24/jtrig-manipulation/
>
> How Covert Agents Infiltrate the Internet to Manipulate, Deceive, and
> Destroy Reputations
>
> One of the many pressing stories that remains to be told from the
> Snowden archive is how western intelligence agencies are attempting to
> manipulate and control online discourse with "extreme tactics of
> deception and reputation-destruction."
>
> Glenn Greenwald
>
>
>
> One of the many pressing stories that remains to be told from the
> Snowden archive is how western intelligence agencies are attempting to
> manipulate and control online discourse with extreme tactics of
> deception and reputation-destruction. It’s time to tell a chunk of that
> story, complete with the relevant documents.
>
> Over the last several weeks, I worked with NBC News to publish a series
> of articles about “dirty trick” tactics used by GCHQ’s previously secret
> unit, JTRIG (Joint Threat Research Intelligence Group). These were based
> on four classified GCHQ documents presented to the NSA and the other
> three partners in the English-speaking “Five Eyes” alliance. Today, we
> at the Intercept are publishing another new JTRIG document, in full,
> entitled “The Art of Deception: Training for Online Covert Operations.”
>
> By publishing these stories one by one, our NBC reporting highlighted
> some of the key, discrete revelations: the monitoring of YouTube and
> Blogger, the targeting of Anonymous with the very same DDoS attacks they
> accuse “hacktivists” of using, the use of “honey traps” (luring people
> into compromising situations using sex) and destructive viruses. But,
> here, I want to focus and elaborate on the overarching point revealed by
> all of these documents: namely, that these agencies are attempting to
> control, infiltrate, manipulate, and warp online discourse, and in doing
> so, are compromising the integrity of the internet itself.
>
> Among the core self-identified purposes of JTRIG are two tactics: (1) to
> inject all sorts of false material onto the internet in order to destroy
> the reputation of its targets; and (2) to use social sciences and other
> techniques to manipulate online discourse and activism to generate
> outcomes it considers desirable. To see how extremist these programs
> are, just consider the tactics they boast of using to achieve those
> ends: “false flag operations” (posting material to the internet and
> falsely attributing it to someone else), fake victim blog posts
> (pretending to be a victim of the individual whose reputation they want
> to destroy), and posting “negative information” on various forums. Here
> is one illustrative list of tactics from the latest GCHQ document we’re
> publishing today:
>
> Other tactics aimed at individuals are listed here, under the revealing
> title “discredit a target”:
>
> Then there are the tactics used to destroy companies the agency targets:
>
>
> GCHQ describes the purpose of JTRIG in starkly clear terms: “using
> online techniques to make something happen in the real or cyber world,”
> including “information ops (influence or disruption).”
>
> Critically, the “targets” for this deceit and reputation-destruction
> extend far beyond the customary roster of normal spycraft: hostile
> nations and their leaders, military agencies, and intelligence services.
> In fact, the discussion of many of these techniques occurs in the
> context of using them in lieu of “traditional law enforcement” against
> people suspected (but not charged or convicted) of ordinary crimes or,
> more broadly still, “hacktivism”, meaning those who use online protest
> activity for political ends.
>
> The title page of one of these documents reflects the agency’s own
> awareness that it is “pushing the boundaries” by using “cyber offensive”
> techniques against people who have nothing to do with terrorism or
> national security threats, and indeed, centrally involves law
> enforcement agents who investigate ordinary crimes:
>
> No matter your views on Anonymous, “hacktivists” or garden-variety
> criminals, it is not difficult to see how dangerous it is to have secret
> government agencies being able to target any individuals they want – who
> have never been charged with, let alone convicted of, any crimes – with
> these sorts of online, deception-based tactics of reputation destruction
> and disruption. There is a strong argument to make, as Jay Leiderman
> demonstrated in the Guardian in the context of the Paypal 14 hacktivist
> persecution, that the “denial of service” tactics used by hacktivists
> result in (at most) trivial damage (far less than the cyber-warfare
> tactics favored by the US and UK) and are far more akin to the type of
> political protest protected by the First Amendment.
>
> The broader point is that, far beyond hacktivists, these surveillance
> agencies have vested themselves with the power to deliberately ruin
> people’s reputations and disrupt their online political activity even
> though they’ve been charged with no crimes, and even though their
> actions have no conceivable connection to terrorism or even national
> security threats. As Anonymous expert Gabriella Coleman of McGill
> University told me, “targeting Anonymous and hacktivists amounts to
> targeting citizens for expressing their political beliefs, resulting in
> the stifling of legitimate dissent.” Pointing to this study she
> published, Professor Coleman vehemently contested the assertion that
> “there is anything terrorist/violent in their actions.”
>
> Government plans to monitor and influence internet communications, and
> covertly infiltrate online communities in order to sow dissension and
> disseminate false information, have long been the source of speculation.
> Harvard Law Professor Cass Sunstein, a close Obama adviser and the White
> House’s former head of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs,
> wrote a controversial paper in 2008 proposing that the US government
> employ teams of covert agents and pseudo-”independent” advocates to
> “cognitively infiltrate” online groups and websites, as well as other
> activist groups.
>
> Sunstein also proposed sending covert agents into “chat rooms, online
> social networks, or even real-space groups” which spread what he views
> as false and damaging “conspiracy theories” about the government.
> Ironically, the very same Sunstein was recently named by Obama to serve
> as a member of the NSA review panel created by the White House, one that
> – while disputing key NSA claims – proceeded to propose many cosmetic
> reforms to the agency’s powers (most of which were ignored by the
> President who appointed them).
>
> But these GCHQ documents are the first to prove that a major western
> government is using some of the most controversial techniques to
> disseminate deception online and harm the reputations of targets. Under
> the tactics they use, the state is deliberately spreading lies on the
> internet about whichever individuals it targets, including the use of
> what GCHQ itself calls “false flag operations” and emails to people’s
> families and friends. Who would possibly trust a government to exercise
> these powers at all, let alone do so in secret, with virtually no
> oversight, and outside of any cognizable legal framework?
>
> Then there is the use of psychology and other social sciences to not
> only understand, but shape and control, how online activism and
> discourse unfolds. Today’s newly published document touts the work of
> GCHQ’s “Human Science Operations Cell,” devoted to “online human
> intelligence” and “strategic influence and disruption”:

"Does the subcontinental patient keep on raving because he feels so inconsequential, doctor...." RH

On Wednesday, October 6, 2021 at 4:15:52 PM UTC+1, FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer wrote:
> On 10/6/2021 7:22 PM, RH wrote:
> > On Wednesday, October 6, 2021 at 2:34:11 PM UTC+1, FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer wrote:
> >> Whites don't understand that REALITY is, actually 1000 times WORSE than
> >> what Greenwald explained in his column.
> >>
> >> KENT WILLS with email id compuelf at gmail.com and the other secret
> >> society psychopaths Bill Pollock aka Muriel McKay aka Loughall Tomartyr
> >> or whatever name it calls itself with email id tsp2opt at gmail.com, to
> >> name a few who infest these newsgroups.
> >>
> >> =============================================================================
> >>
> >> https://theintercept.com/2014/02/24/jtrig-manipulation/
> >>
> >> How Covert Agents Infiltrate the Internet to Manipulate, Deceive, and
> >> Destroy Reputations
> >>
> >> One of the many pressing stories that remains to be told from the
> >> Snowden archive is how western intelligence agencies are attempting to
> >> manipulate and control online discourse with "extreme tactics of
> >> deception and reputation-destruction."
> >>
> >> Glenn Greenwald
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> One of the many pressing stories that remains to be told from the
> >> Snowden archive is how western intelligence agencies are attempting to
> >> manipulate and control online discourse with extreme tactics of
> >> deception and reputation-destruction. It’s time to tell a chunk of that
> >> story, complete with the relevant documents.
> >>
> >> Over the last several weeks, I worked with NBC News to publish a series
> >> of articles about “dirty trick” tactics used by GCHQ’s previously secret
> >> unit, JTRIG (Joint Threat Research Intelligence Group). These were based
> >> on four classified GCHQ documents presented to the NSA and the other
> >> three partners in the English-speaking “Five Eyes” alliance. Today, we
> >> at the Intercept are publishing another new JTRIG document, in full,
> >> entitled “The Art of Deception: Training for Online Covert Operations.”
> >>
> >> By publishing these stories one by one, our NBC reporting highlighted
> >> some of the key, discrete revelations: the monitoring of YouTube and
> >> Blogger, the targeting of Anonymous with the very same DDoS attacks they
> >> accuse “hacktivists” of using, the use of “honey traps” (luring people
> >> into compromising situations using sex) and destructive viruses. But,
> >> here, I want to focus and elaborate on the overarching point revealed by
> >> all of these documents: namely, that these agencies are attempting to
> >> control, infiltrate, manipulate, and warp online discourse, and in doing
> >> so, are compromising the integrity of the internet itself.
> >>
> >> Among the core self-identified purposes of JTRIG are two tactics: (1) to
> >> inject all sorts of false material onto the internet in order to destroy
> >> the reputation of its targets; and (2) to use social sciences and other
> >> techniques to manipulate online discourse and activism to generate
> >> outcomes it considers desirable. To see how extremist these programs
> >> are, just consider the tactics they boast of using to achieve those
> >> ends: “false flag operations” (posting material to the internet and
> >> falsely attributing it to someone else), fake victim blog posts
> >> (pretending to be a victim of the individual whose reputation they want
> >> to destroy), and posting “negative information” on various forums. Here
> >> is one illustrative list of tactics from the latest GCHQ document we’re
> >> publishing today:
> >>
> >> Other tactics aimed at individuals are listed here, under the revealing
> >> title “discredit a target”:
> >>
> >> Then there are the tactics used to destroy companies the agency targets:
> >>
> >>
> >> GCHQ describes the purpose of JTRIG in starkly clear terms: “using
> >> online techniques to make something happen in the real or cyber world,”
> >> including “information ops (influence or disruption).”
> >>
> >> Critically, the “targets” for this deceit and reputation-destruction
> >> extend far beyond the customary roster of normal spycraft: hostile
> >> nations and their leaders, military agencies, and intelligence services.
> >> In fact, the discussion of many of these techniques occurs in the
> >> context of using them in lieu of “traditional law enforcement” against
> >> people suspected (but not charged or convicted) of ordinary crimes or,
> >> more broadly still, “hacktivism”, meaning those who use online protest
> >> activity for political ends.
> >>
> >> The title page of one of these documents reflects the agency’s own
> >> awareness that it is “pushing the boundaries” by using “cyber offensive”
> >> techniques against people who have nothing to do with terrorism or
> >> national security threats, and indeed, centrally involves law
> >> enforcement agents who investigate ordinary crimes:
> >>
> >> No matter your views on Anonymous, “hacktivists” or garden-variety
> >> criminals, it is not difficult to see how dangerous it is to have secret
> >> government agencies being able to target any individuals they want – who
> >> have never been charged with, let alone convicted of, any crimes – with
> >> these sorts of online, deception-based tactics of reputation destruction
> >> and disruption. There is a strong argument to make, as Jay Leiderman
> >> demonstrated in the Guardian in the context of the Paypal 14 hacktivist
> >> persecution, that the “denial of service” tactics used by hacktivists
> >> result in (at most) trivial damage (far less than the cyber-warfare
> >> tactics favored by the US and UK) and are far more akin to the type of
> >> political protest protected by the First Amendment.
> >>
> >> The broader point is that, far beyond hacktivists, these surveillance
> >> agencies have vested themselves with the power to deliberately ruin
> >> people’s reputations and disrupt their online political activity even
> >> though they’ve been charged with no crimes, and even though their
> >> actions have no conceivable connection to terrorism or even national
> >> security threats. As Anonymous expert Gabriella Coleman of McGill
> >> University told me, “targeting Anonymous and hacktivists amounts to
> >> targeting citizens for expressing their political beliefs, resulting in
> >> the stifling of legitimate dissent.” Pointing to this study she
> >> published, Professor Coleman vehemently contested the assertion that
> >> “there is anything terrorist/violent in their actions.”
> >>
> >> Government plans to monitor and influence internet communications, and
> >> covertly infiltrate online communities in order to sow dissension and
> >> disseminate false information, have long been the source of speculation.
> >> Harvard Law Professor Cass Sunstein, a close Obama adviser and the White
> >> House’s former head of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs,
> >> wrote a controversial paper in 2008 proposing that the US government
> >> employ teams of covert agents and pseudo-”independent” advocates to
> >> “cognitively infiltrate” online groups and websites, as well as other
> >> activist groups.
> >>
> >> Sunstein also proposed sending covert agents into “chat rooms, online
> >> social networks, or even real-space groups” which spread what he views
> >> as false and damaging “conspiracy theories” about the government.
> >> Ironically, the very same Sunstein was recently named by Obama to serve
> >> as a member of the NSA review panel created by the White House, one that
> >> – while disputing key NSA claims – proceeded to propose many cosmetic
> >> reforms to the agency’s powers (most of which were ignored by the
> >> President who appointed them).
> >>
> >> But these GCHQ documents are the first to prove that a major western
> >> government is using some of the most controversial techniques to
> >> disseminate deception online and harm the reputations of targets. Under
> >> the tactics they use, the state is deliberately spreading lies on the
> >> internet about whichever individuals it targets, including the use of
> >> what GCHQ itself calls “false flag operations” and emails to people’s
> >> families and friends. Who would possibly trust a government to exercise
> >> these powers at all, let alone do so in secret, with virtually no
> >> oversight, and outside of any cognizable legal framework?
> >>
> >> Then there is the use of psychology and other social sciences to not
> >> only understand, but shape and control, how online activism and
> >> discourse unfolds. Today’s newly published document touts the work of
> >> GCHQ’s “Human Science Operations Cell,” devoted to “online human
> >> intelligence” and “strategic influence and disruption”:
> >
> > "Does the subcontinental patient keep on raving because he feels so inconsequential, doctor...." RH
> >
> Did you DOWNLOAD this SHADOW GOVT Psychopath KENT WILLS' picture who
> SECRETLY CHIPPED YOU 15 years ago, and FILE complaints with POLICE n
> POLITICIANS?

On Wednesday, October 6, 2021 at 9:13:16 PM UTC+1, FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer wrote:
> On 10/6/2021 9:20 PM, RH wrote:
> > On Wednesday, October 6, 2021 at 4:15:52 PM UTC+1, FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer wrote:
> >> On 10/6/2021 7:22 PM, RH wrote:
> >>> On Wednesday, October 6, 2021 at 2:34:11 PM UTC+1, FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer wrote:
> >>>> Whites don't understand that REALITY is, actually 1000 times WORSE than
> >>>> what Greenwald explained in his column.
> >>>>
> >>>> KENT WILLS with email id compuelf at gmail.com and the other secret
> >>>> society psychopaths Bill Pollock aka Muriel McKay aka Loughall Tomartyr
> >>>> or whatever name it calls itself with email id tsp2opt at gmail.com, to
> >>>> name a few who infest these newsgroups.
> >>>>
> >>>> =============================================================================
> >>>>
> >>>> https://theintercept.com/2014/02/24/jtrig-manipulation/
> >>>>
> >>>> How Covert Agents Infiltrate the Internet to Manipulate, Deceive, and
> >>>> Destroy Reputations
> >>>>
> >>>> One of the many pressing stories that remains to be told from the
> >>>> Snowden archive is how western intelligence agencies are attempting to
> >>>> manipulate and control online discourse with "extreme tactics of
> >>>> deception and reputation-destruction."
> >>>>
> >>>> Glenn Greenwald
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> One of the many pressing stories that remains to be told from the
> >>>> Snowden archive is how western intelligence agencies are attempting to
> >>>> manipulate and control online discourse with extreme tactics of
> >>>> deception and reputation-destruction. It’s time to tell a chunk of that
> >>>> story, complete with the relevant documents.
> >>>>
> >>>> Over the last several weeks, I worked with NBC News to publish a series
> >>>> of articles about “dirty trick” tactics used by GCHQ’s previously secret
> >>>> unit, JTRIG (Joint Threat Research Intelligence Group). These were based
> >>>> on four classified GCHQ documents presented to the NSA and the other
> >>>> three partners in the English-speaking “Five Eyes” alliance. Today, we
> >>>> at the Intercept are publishing another new JTRIG document, in full,
> >>>> entitled “The Art of Deception: Training for Online Covert Operations.”
> >>>>
> >>>> By publishing these stories one by one, our NBC reporting highlighted
> >>>> some of the key, discrete revelations: the monitoring of YouTube and
> >>>> Blogger, the targeting of Anonymous with the very same DDoS attacks they
> >>>> accuse “hacktivists” of using, the use of “honey traps” (luring people
> >>>> into compromising situations using sex) and destructive viruses. But,
> >>>> here, I want to focus and elaborate on the overarching point revealed by
> >>>> all of these documents: namely, that these agencies are attempting to
> >>>> control, infiltrate, manipulate, and warp online discourse, and in doing
> >>>> so, are compromising the integrity of the internet itself.
> >>>>
> >>>> Among the core self-identified purposes of JTRIG are two tactics: (1) to
> >>>> inject all sorts of false material onto the internet in order to destroy
> >>>> the reputation of its targets; and (2) to use social sciences and other
> >>>> techniques to manipulate online discourse and activism to generate
> >>>> outcomes it considers desirable. To see how extremist these programs
> >>>> are, just consider the tactics they boast of using to achieve those
> >>>> ends: “false flag operations” (posting material to the internet and
> >>>> falsely attributing it to someone else), fake victim blog posts
> >>>> (pretending to be a victim of the individual whose reputation they want
> >>>> to destroy), and posting “negative information” on various forums. Here
> >>>> is one illustrative list of tactics from the latest GCHQ document we’re
> >>>> publishing today:
> >>>>
> >>>> Other tactics aimed at individuals are listed here, under the revealing
> >>>> title “discredit a target”:
> >>>>
> >>>> Then there are the tactics used to destroy companies the agency targets:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> GCHQ describes the purpose of JTRIG in starkly clear terms: “using
> >>>> online techniques to make something happen in the real or cyber world,”
> >>>> including “information ops (influence or disruption).”
> >>>>
> >>>> Critically, the “targets” for this deceit and reputation-destruction
> >>>> extend far beyond the customary roster of normal spycraft: hostile
> >>>> nations and their leaders, military agencies, and intelligence services.
> >>>> In fact, the discussion of many of these techniques occurs in the
> >>>> context of using them in lieu of “traditional law enforcement” against
> >>>> people suspected (but not charged or convicted) of ordinary crimes or,
> >>>> more broadly still, “hacktivism”, meaning those who use online protest
> >>>> activity for political ends.
> >>>>
> >>>> The title page of one of these documents reflects the agency’s own
> >>>> awareness that it is “pushing the boundaries” by using “cyber offensive”
> >>>> techniques against people who have nothing to do with terrorism or
> >>>> national security threats, and indeed, centrally involves law
> >>>> enforcement agents who investigate ordinary crimes:
> >>>>
> >>>> No matter your views on Anonymous, “hacktivists” or garden-variety
> >>>> criminals, it is not difficult to see how dangerous it is to have secret
> >>>> government agencies being able to target any individuals they want – who
> >>>> have never been charged with, let alone convicted of, any crimes – with
> >>>> these sorts of online, deception-based tactics of reputation destruction
> >>>> and disruption. There is a strong argument to make, as Jay Leiderman
> >>>> demonstrated in the Guardian in the context of the Paypal 14 hacktivist
> >>>> persecution, that the “denial of service” tactics used by hacktivists
> >>>> result in (at most) trivial damage (far less than the cyber-warfare
> >>>> tactics favored by the US and UK) and are far more akin to the type of
> >>>> political protest protected by the First Amendment.
> >>>>
> >>>> The broader point is that, far beyond hacktivists, these surveillance
> >>>> agencies have vested themselves with the power to deliberately ruin
> >>>> people’s reputations and disrupt their online political activity even
> >>>> though they’ve been charged with no crimes, and even though their
> >>>> actions have no conceivable connection to terrorism or even national
> >>>> security threats. As Anonymous expert Gabriella Coleman of McGill
> >>>> University told me, “targeting Anonymous and hacktivists amounts to
> >>>> targeting citizens for expressing their political beliefs, resulting in
> >>>> the stifling of legitimate dissent.” Pointing to this study she
> >>>> published, Professor Coleman vehemently contested the assertion that
> >>>> “there is anything terrorist/violent in their actions.”
> >>>>
> >>>> Government plans to monitor and influence internet communications, and
> >>>> covertly infiltrate online communities in order to sow dissension and
> >>>> disseminate false information, have long been the source of speculation.
> >>>> Harvard Law Professor Cass Sunstein, a close Obama adviser and the White
> >>>> House’s former head of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs,
> >>>> wrote a controversial paper in 2008 proposing that the US government
> >>>> employ teams of covert agents and pseudo-”independent” advocates to
> >>>> “cognitively infiltrate” online groups and websites, as well as other
> >>>> activist groups.
> >>>>
> >>>> Sunstein also proposed sending covert agents into “chat rooms, online
> >>>> social networks, or even real-space groups” which spread what he views
> >>>> as false and damaging “conspiracy theories” about the government.
> >>>> Ironically, the very same Sunstein was recently named by Obama to serve
> >>>> as a member of the NSA review panel created by the White House, one that
> >>>> – while disputing key NSA claims – proceeded to propose many cosmetic
> >>>> reforms to the agency’s powers (most of which were ignored by the
> >>>> President who appointed them).
> >>>>
> >>>> But these GCHQ documents are the first to prove that a major western
> >>>> government is using some of the most controversial techniques to
> >>>> disseminate deception online and harm the reputations of targets. Under
> >>>> the tactics they use, the state is deliberately spreading lies on the
> >>>> internet about whichever individuals it targets, including the use of
> >>>> what GCHQ itself calls “false flag operations” and emails to people’s
> >>>> families and friends. Who would possibly trust a government to exercise
> >>>> these powers at all, let alone do so in secret, with virtually no
> >>>> oversight, and outside of any cognizable legal framework?
> >>>>
> >>>> Then there is the use of psychology and other social sciences to not
> >>>> only understand, but shape and control, how online activism and
> >>>> discourse unfolds. Today’s newly published document touts the work of
> >>>> GCHQ’s “Human Science Operations Cell,” devoted to “online human
> >>>> intelligence” and “strategic influence and disruption”:
> >>>
> >>> "Does the subcontinental patient keep on raving because he feels so inconsequential, doctor...." RH
> >>>
> >> Did you DOWNLOAD this SHADOW GOVT Psychopath KENT WILLS' picture who
> >> SECRETLY CHIPPED YOU 15 years ago, and FILE complaints with POLICE n
> >> POLITICIANS?
> >
> > ..." That is a large part it , nurse. The patient tries to inflate his sense of having importance although he knows deep within himself that he is utterly without purpose ....RH
> >
> Robert Henderson is PLANNING to MURDER CIA MI6 Shadow Govt Psychopath
> KENT WILLS (compuelf at gmail.com)
> Did you DOWNLOAD this SHADOW GOVT Psychopath KENT WILLS' picture who
> SECRETLY CHIPPED YOU 15 years ago.
> ALL OF YOU SHOULD DOWNLOAD this PSYCHOPATH "Kent Wills" PICTURE and FILE
> A COMPLAINT with FBI, POLICE n Politicians
>
>
>
>
> EVIL SHADOW GOVT Psychopath Kent Wills who is SECRETLY CHIPPING
> Amrikkkans with MIND CONTROL CHIPS and TORTURING with Directed Energy
> Weapons
> https://imgur.com/pZOi7i4
>
>
>
> ALL OF YOU "VICTIMS" SHOULD DOWNLOAD this CIA NSA FBI CointelPro,
> Military Industrial Complex (MIC) Shadow Govt PSYCHOPATH "Kent Wills"
> PICTURE and FILE A POLICE COMPLAINT and FBI Complaint.
>
>
> ALL OF YOU on the newsgroups this Psychopath Kent Wills contributed
> including uk.sport.cricket, rec.sport.cricket, misc.survivalism,
> soc.retirement, tx.guns, alt.politics.trump, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,
> alt.fan.sean-hannity were SECRETLY CHIPPED years ago and hence you
> should NOTE DOWN his email id, download the Psychopath's PICTURE and
> FILE police complaints and with FBI, your senators, congressmen, potus,
> vp and every law enforcement agency.
>
>
> This Psychopath KENT WILLS email id is comp...@gmail.com or compuelf at
> gmail.com
>
>
> This Psychopath Kent Wills is part of the SECRET SOCIETY SHADOW GOVT
> which has been SECRETLY CHIPPING amrikkkans with MIND CONTROL CHIPS and
> linking the VICTIMS BRAINS to NSA Quantum Computer Artificial
> Intelligence HIVE MIND CONTROL GRID and REMOTELY OPERATING the victims
> like fucking PUPPETS.
>
> POST this on EVERY forum including Reddit, Digg and VIRALLY SPREAD it in
> every chat groups, emails, forums, militia websites, white supremacist,
> white nationalist, republican websites.
>
>
> These CIA NSA FBI CointelPro, MIC Shadow Govt Psychopaths have been
> STEALTHILY TORTURING me for the last 20 years NON-STOP like
> Whistleblower Bryan Kofron EXPOSED in his VIDEOS below.
>
>
> Everything, LITERALLY EVERYTHING in these EXPOSE VIDEOS is "100% REAL".
>
>
> You, white xtian MORONS.....The EVIL WHITE CHRISTIANS in your EVIL GOVTS
> aka NSA CIA MI6 MI5 ASIS ASIO have been SECRETLY CHIPPING you and
> LINKING your brains to the NSA Quantum Computers AI GLOBAL HIVE MIND
> CONTROL GRID for the last 50 years, no joke, yes that is 50 years.
>
> They DEVELOPED these MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES and PERFECTED them by
> 1970s and STEALTHILY IMPLEMENTED George Orwell's 1984 "EVER SINCE".
>
>
> Email ALL THESE VIDEOS to every person you know on this planet and
> EDUCATE THEM about the EVIL WHITE PSYCHOPATHS in YOUR GOVTS.
>
> NEVER TRUST your fellow white neighbors, because they could be ONE of
> the CIA NSA MI6 MI6 ASIS ASIO and Military Industrial Complex (MIC, a
> few million) Psychopaths who SECRETLY CHIPPED you and put you under
> 24x7n ILLEGAL SURVEILLANCE and remotely operating you like PUPPETS.
>
>
> WHITE Women are BREEDING complete EVIL VIRUS. The "good white men" DON'T
> HAVE THE BALLS to FIGHT the EVIL WHITE FILTH.
>
> Western Whites DON'T HAVE even an IOTA OF RESPECTABLE CHARACTER TRAIT.
>
> The Good Whites
>
> -have NO BALLS to fight the EVIL WHITES
> -Believes the EVIL WHITE PSYCHOPATHS over Victims
> -are EASILY DECEIVED by the EVIL WHITES
> -Believe in their delusional heads that their countries are DEMOCRACIES
> -Enables the EVIL WHITES to commit genocides
> -Believe their countries are civilized angels and everybody else is EVIL
> -Contribute NOTHING to make human species respectable
> -Supports the EVIL WHITES committing genocides
>
>
>
>
> Even GODS will be SHOCKED at the "INFINITE DECEPTION and CUNNING" of
> "White race".
>
> WHITE CHRISTIANS "Deceiving Non-Whites" WITH SMALL POX INFESTED BLANKETS
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EEHsR63F5Dw
>
>
> “When the Missionaries arrived, the Africans had the land and the
> Missionaries had the Bible. They taught how to pray with our eyes
> closed. When we opened them, they had the land and we had the Bible.”
>
> ― Jomo Kenyatta
>
>
> MULTIPLY this DECEPTION by a FACTOR of a MILLION and you will understand
> "HOW your EVIL GOVTS are BACKSTABBING YOU".
>
>
> NEVER TRUST your fellow white neighbors, because they could be ONE of
> the CIA NSA MI6 MI6 ASIS ASIO and Military Industrial Complex (MIC, a
> few million) Psychopaths who SECRETLY CHIPPED you and put you under
> 24x7n ILLEGAL SURVEILLANCE and remotely operating you like PUPPETS.
>
>
> White Christians SHOULD and MUST UNDERSTAND that if evil whites
> "DECEIVED non-whites", then the "SAME EVIL WHITE CHRISTIANS are
> DECEIVING you good whites too".
>
>
>
> Whistleblower Bryan Kofron - Remote Neural Monitoring of Targeted
> Individuals
> https://www.facebook.com/100058423131601/videos/132785765345527/
>
>
>
> Perpetrator turned Whistleblower Bryan Kofron EXPOSES Gang Stalking,
> Targeted Individuals - Mind Control - Directed Energy Weapons
> https://www.facebook.com/100058423131601/videos/143127704311333/
>
>
>
> Bryan Kofron EXPOSES Gangstalking, Electronic Harassment, Mind Control
> Targeted Individual Program
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Z8VKZA-RFc
>
>
>
> MK ULTRA 2020 REMOTE MIND CONTROL THROUGH AMAZON CIA CLOUD COMPUTING
> ELECTRONIC BRAIN LINK
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6L8pwVcNwQk&t=875s
>
>
>
> SECURITY INDUSTRY SPECIALIST TELLS ALL: Bryan Kofron Original Podcast #1
> from Gangstalkerwars.com
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KcDBS2HE-70
>
>
>
> SECURITY INDUSTRY SPECIALIST TELLS ALL: Bryan Kofron Original Podcast #2
> from Gangstalkerwars.com
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0z9QodNdmco
>
>
>
> No Chip Required: Biocoded DNA Resonant Frequency Links Targeted
> Individuals to Mind Control Matrix
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uqqdS7iEv00
>
>
>
> Neuroreality: The New World Order is coming. And It’s a Brain to
> Computer Interface.
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vDqnXhhsBo4
>
>
>
> They Control Your Mind Through Your Very Own Virtual Avatar in a Digital
> Mirror World.
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=neOQNpxN0zs&t=16s
>
>
>
>
>
> Scientist Dr. Paul Batcho said EVIL US GOVT is also using CELL TOWERS to
> MANIPULATE and CONTROL human minds.
>
> CELL TOWERS are being USED by CIA n NSA DEEP STATE to MANIPULATE HUMAN
> BRAINS with SYNTHETIC TELEPATHY
> https://groups.google.com/g/uk.sport.cricket/c/mLxKZPIZw9E/m/jeggrqQIBAAJ
>
>
>
> HOW CIA MI6 MI5 PSYCHOPATHS TORTURED SCIENTIST Dr. Katherine Horton for
> the last 10 years with MIND CONTROL CHIPS and DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS
> https://groups.google.com/g/uk.sport.cricket/c/sBqjArXw_g4/m/fJcPm0MmCgAJ
>
>
>
> MERCILESSLY MASSACRE THE CIA, NSA n FBI AGENTS LIKE FUCKING PIGS for
> SECRETLY CHIPPING Amrikkkans with MIND CONTROL CHIPS
> https://groups.google.com/g/uk.sport.cricket/c/rATE8TaLIcg/m/B77TudfbAQAJ
>
>
>
>
>
> WHITE CHRISTIANS being INFINITELY CUNNING and DECEPTIVE FILTHY VIRUS
> motherfuckers, they "MURDER their own citizens" and make it look like
> suicides and accidents.
>
>
> EVIL WHITE CHRISTIANS being INFINITELY CUNNING and DECEPTIVE FILTHY
> VIRUS motherfuckers "STEALTHILY TORTURE" their own citizens and BLAME
> the victims to be schizophrenics and delusional.
>
>
> Frank Olson MURDERED by CIA white christian motherfuckers and made it
> look like a suicide
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Olson
>
>
>
> Journalist Michael Hastings MURDERED by the CIA WHITE CHRISTIAN
> MOTHERFUCKERS and made it look like an "accident"
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Hastings_(journalist)
>
>
>
> Phil Schneider MURDERED by CIA and made it look like a suicide
> https://www.amazon.com/PHILIP-SCHNEIDER-whistleblowers-overwhelming-evidence-ebook/dp/B07HRLLJ1T

On Thursday, October 7, 2021 at 6:20:51 AM UTC-7, FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer wrote:
- flush -

On Thursday, October 7, 2021 at 2:20:51 PM UTC+1, FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer wrote:
> On 10/7/2021 2:42 PM, RH wrote:
> > On Wednesday, October 6, 2021 at 9:13:16 PM UTC+1, FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer wrote:
> >> On 10/6/2021 9:20 PM, RH wrote:
> >>> On Wednesday, October 6, 2021 at 4:15:52 PM UTC+1, FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer wrote:
> >>>> On 10/6/2021 7:22 PM, RH wrote:
> >>>>> On Wednesday, October 6, 2021 at 2:34:11 PM UTC+1, FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer wrote:
> >>>>>> Whites don't understand that REALITY is, actually 1000 times WORSE than
> >>>>>> what Greenwald explained in his column.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> KENT WILLS with email id compuelf at gmail.com and the other secret
> >>>>>> society psychopaths Bill Pollock aka Muriel McKay aka Loughall Tomartyr
> >>>>>> or whatever name it calls itself with email id tsp2opt at gmail.com, to
> >>>>>> name a few who infest these newsgroups.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> =============================================================================
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> https://theintercept.com/2014/02/24/jtrig-manipulation/
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> How Covert Agents Infiltrate the Internet to Manipulate, Deceive, and
> >>>>>> Destroy Reputations
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> One of the many pressing stories that remains to be told from the
> >>>>>> Snowden archive is how western intelligence agencies are attempting to
> >>>>>> manipulate and control online discourse with "extreme tactics of
> >>>>>> deception and reputation-destruction."
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Glenn Greenwald
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> One of the many pressing stories that remains to be told from the
> >>>>>> Snowden archive is how western intelligence agencies are attempting to
> >>>>>> manipulate and control online discourse with extreme tactics of
> >>>>>> deception and reputation-destruction. It’s time to tell a chunk of that
> >>>>>> story, complete with the relevant documents.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Over the last several weeks, I worked with NBC News to publish a series
> >>>>>> of articles about “dirty trick” tactics used by GCHQ’s previously secret
> >>>>>> unit, JTRIG (Joint Threat Research Intelligence Group). These were based
> >>>>>> on four classified GCHQ documents presented to the NSA and the other
> >>>>>> three partners in the English-speaking “Five Eyes” alliance. Today, we
> >>>>>> at the Intercept are publishing another new JTRIG document, in full,
> >>>>>> entitled “The Art of Deception: Training for Online Covert Operations.”
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> By publishing these stories one by one, our NBC reporting highlighted
> >>>>>> some of the key, discrete revelations: the monitoring of YouTube and
> >>>>>> Blogger, the targeting of Anonymous with the very same DDoS attacks they
> >>>>>> accuse “hacktivists” of using, the use of “honey traps” (luring people
> >>>>>> into compromising situations using sex) and destructive viruses. But,
> >>>>>> here, I want to focus and elaborate on the overarching point revealed by
> >>>>>> all of these documents: namely, that these agencies are attempting to
> >>>>>> control, infiltrate, manipulate, and warp online discourse, and in doing
> >>>>>> so, are compromising the integrity of the internet itself.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Among the core self-identified purposes of JTRIG are two tactics: (1) to
> >>>>>> inject all sorts of false material onto the internet in order to destroy
> >>>>>> the reputation of its targets; and (2) to use social sciences and other
> >>>>>> techniques to manipulate online discourse and activism to generate
> >>>>>> outcomes it considers desirable. To see how extremist these programs
> >>>>>> are, just consider the tactics they boast of using to achieve those
> >>>>>> ends: “false flag operations” (posting material to the internet and
> >>>>>> falsely attributing it to someone else), fake victim blog posts
> >>>>>> (pretending to be a victim of the individual whose reputation they want
> >>>>>> to destroy), and posting “negative information” on various forums. Here
> >>>>>> is one illustrative list of tactics from the latest GCHQ document we’re
> >>>>>> publishing today:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Other tactics aimed at individuals are listed here, under the revealing
> >>>>>> title “discredit a target”:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Then there are the tactics used to destroy companies the agency targets:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> GCHQ describes the purpose of JTRIG in starkly clear terms: “using
> >>>>>> online techniques to make something happen in the real or cyber world,”
> >>>>>> including “information ops (influence or disruption).”
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Critically, the “targets” for this deceit and reputation-destruction
> >>>>>> extend far beyond the customary roster of normal spycraft: hostile
> >>>>>> nations and their leaders, military agencies, and intelligence services.
> >>>>>> In fact, the discussion of many of these techniques occurs in the
> >>>>>> context of using them in lieu of “traditional law enforcement” against
> >>>>>> people suspected (but not charged or convicted) of ordinary crimes or,
> >>>>>> more broadly still, “hacktivism”, meaning those who use online protest
> >>>>>> activity for political ends.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The title page of one of these documents reflects the agency’s own
> >>>>>> awareness that it is “pushing the boundaries” by using “cyber offensive”
> >>>>>> techniques against people who have nothing to do with terrorism or
> >>>>>> national security threats, and indeed, centrally involves law
> >>>>>> enforcement agents who investigate ordinary crimes:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> No matter your views on Anonymous, “hacktivists” or garden-variety
> >>>>>> criminals, it is not difficult to see how dangerous it is to have secret
> >>>>>> government agencies being able to target any individuals they want – who
> >>>>>> have never been charged with, let alone convicted of, any crimes – with
> >>>>>> these sorts of online, deception-based tactics of reputation destruction
> >>>>>> and disruption. There is a strong argument to make, as Jay Leiderman
> >>>>>> demonstrated in the Guardian in the context of the Paypal 14 hacktivist
> >>>>>> persecution, that the “denial of service” tactics used by hacktivists
> >>>>>> result in (at most) trivial damage (far less than the cyber-warfare
> >>>>>> tactics favored by the US and UK) and are far more akin to the type of
> >>>>>> political protest protected by the First Amendment.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The broader point is that, far beyond hacktivists, these surveillance
> >>>>>> agencies have vested themselves with the power to deliberately ruin
> >>>>>> people’s reputations and disrupt their online political activity even
> >>>>>> though they’ve been charged with no crimes, and even though their
> >>>>>> actions have no conceivable connection to terrorism or even national
> >>>>>> security threats. As Anonymous expert Gabriella Coleman of McGill
> >>>>>> University told me, “targeting Anonymous and hacktivists amounts to
> >>>>>> targeting citizens for expressing their political beliefs, resulting in
> >>>>>> the stifling of legitimate dissent.” Pointing to this study she
> >>>>>> published, Professor Coleman vehemently contested the assertion that
> >>>>>> “there is anything terrorist/violent in their actions.”
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Government plans to monitor and influence internet communications, and
> >>>>>> covertly infiltrate online communities in order to sow dissension and
> >>>>>> disseminate false information, have long been the source of speculation.
> >>>>>> Harvard Law Professor Cass Sunstein, a close Obama adviser and the White
> >>>>>> House’s former head of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs,
> >>>>>> wrote a controversial paper in 2008 proposing that the US government
> >>>>>> employ teams of covert agents and pseudo-”independent” advocates to
> >>>>>> “cognitively infiltrate” online groups and websites, as well as other
> >>>>>> activist groups.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Sunstein also proposed sending covert agents into “chat rooms, online
> >>>>>> social networks, or even real-space groups” which spread what he views
> >>>>>> as false and damaging “conspiracy theories” about the government.
> >>>>>> Ironically, the very same Sunstein was recently named by Obama to serve
> >>>>>> as a member of the NSA review panel created by the White House, one that
> >>>>>> – while disputing key NSA claims – proceeded to propose many cosmetic
> >>>>>> reforms to the agency’s powers (most of which were ignored by the
> >>>>>> President who appointed them).
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> But these GCHQ documents are the first to prove that a major western
> >>>>>> government is using some of the most controversial techniques to
> >>>>>> disseminate deception online and harm the reputations of targets. Under
> >>>>>> the tactics they use, the state is deliberately spreading lies on the
> >>>>>> internet about whichever individuals it targets, including the use of
> >>>>>> what GCHQ itself calls “false flag operations” and emails to people’s
> >>>>>> families and friends. Who would possibly trust a government to exercise
> >>>>>> these powers at all, let alone do so in secret, with virtually no
> >>>>>> oversight, and outside of any cognizable legal framework?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Then there is the use of psychology and other social sciences to not
> >>>>>> only understand, but shape and control, how online activism and
> >>>>>> discourse unfolds. Today’s newly published document touts the work of
> >>>>>> GCHQ’s “Human Science Operations Cell,” devoted to “online human
> >>>>>> intelligence” and “strategic influence and disruption”:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> "Does the subcontinental patient keep on raving because he feels so inconsequential, doctor...." RH

On Tuesday, October 12, 2021 at 11:00:27 AM UTC+1, FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer wrote:
> On 10/12/2021 3:12 PM, RH wrote:
> > On Thursday, October 7, 2021 at 2:20:51 PM UTC+1, FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer wrote:
> >> On 10/7/2021 2:42 PM, RH wrote:
> >>> On Wednesday, October 6, 2021 at 9:13:16 PM UTC+1, FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer wrote:
> >>>> On 10/6/2021 9:20 PM, RH wrote:
> >>>>> On Wednesday, October 6, 2021 at 4:15:52 PM UTC+1, FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer wrote:
> >>>>>> On 10/6/2021 7:22 PM, RH wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Wednesday, October 6, 2021 at 2:34:11 PM UTC+1, FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Whites don't understand that REALITY is, actually 1000 times WORSE than
> >>>>>>>> what Greenwald explained in his column.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> KENT WILLS with email id compuelf at gmail.com and the other secret
> >>>>>>>> society psychopaths Bill Pollock aka Muriel McKay aka Loughall Tomartyr
> >>>>>>>> or whatever name it calls itself with email id tsp2opt at gmail.com, to
> >>>>>>>> name a few who infest these newsgroups.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> =============================================================================
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> https://theintercept.com/2014/02/24/jtrig-manipulation/
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> How Covert Agents Infiltrate the Internet to Manipulate, Deceive, and
> >>>>>>>> Destroy Reputations
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> One of the many pressing stories that remains to be told from the
> >>>>>>>> Snowden archive is how western intelligence agencies are attempting to
> >>>>>>>> manipulate and control online discourse with "extreme tactics of
> >>>>>>>> deception and reputation-destruction."
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Glenn Greenwald
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> One of the many pressing stories that remains to be told from the
> >>>>>>>> Snowden archive is how western intelligence agencies are attempting to
> >>>>>>>> manipulate and control online discourse with extreme tactics of
> >>>>>>>> deception and reputation-destruction. It’s time to tell a chunk of that
> >>>>>>>> story, complete with the relevant documents.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Over the last several weeks, I worked with NBC News to publish a series
> >>>>>>>> of articles about “dirty trick” tactics used by GCHQ’s previously secret
> >>>>>>>> unit, JTRIG (Joint Threat Research Intelligence Group). These were based
> >>>>>>>> on four classified GCHQ documents presented to the NSA and the other
> >>>>>>>> three partners in the English-speaking “Five Eyes” alliance. Today, we
> >>>>>>>> at the Intercept are publishing another new JTRIG document, in full,
> >>>>>>>> entitled “The Art of Deception: Training for Online Covert Operations.”
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> By publishing these stories one by one, our NBC reporting highlighted
> >>>>>>>> some of the key, discrete revelations: the monitoring of YouTube and
> >>>>>>>> Blogger, the targeting of Anonymous with the very same DDoS attacks they
> >>>>>>>> accuse “hacktivists” of using, the use of “honey traps” (luring people
> >>>>>>>> into compromising situations using sex) and destructive viruses. But,
> >>>>>>>> here, I want to focus and elaborate on the overarching point revealed by
> >>>>>>>> all of these documents: namely, that these agencies are attempting to
> >>>>>>>> control, infiltrate, manipulate, and warp online discourse, and in doing
> >>>>>>>> so, are compromising the integrity of the internet itself.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Among the core self-identified purposes of JTRIG are two tactics: (1) to
> >>>>>>>> inject all sorts of false material onto the internet in order to destroy
> >>>>>>>> the reputation of its targets; and (2) to use social sciences and other
> >>>>>>>> techniques to manipulate online discourse and activism to generate
> >>>>>>>> outcomes it considers desirable. To see how extremist these programs
> >>>>>>>> are, just consider the tactics they boast of using to achieve those
> >>>>>>>> ends: “false flag operations” (posting material to the internet and
> >>>>>>>> falsely attributing it to someone else), fake victim blog posts
> >>>>>>>> (pretending to be a victim of the individual whose reputation they want
> >>>>>>>> to destroy), and posting “negative information” on various forums. Here
> >>>>>>>> is one illustrative list of tactics from the latest GCHQ document we’re
> >>>>>>>> publishing today:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Other tactics aimed at individuals are listed here, under the revealing
> >>>>>>>> title “discredit a target”:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Then there are the tactics used to destroy companies the agency targets:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> GCHQ describes the purpose of JTRIG in starkly clear terms: “using
> >>>>>>>> online techniques to make something happen in the real or cyber world,”
> >>>>>>>> including “information ops (influence or disruption).”
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Critically, the “targets” for this deceit and reputation-destruction
> >>>>>>>> extend far beyond the customary roster of normal spycraft: hostile
> >>>>>>>> nations and their leaders, military agencies, and intelligence services.
> >>>>>>>> In fact, the discussion of many of these techniques occurs in the
> >>>>>>>> context of using them in lieu of “traditional law enforcement” against
> >>>>>>>> people suspected (but not charged or convicted) of ordinary crimes or,
> >>>>>>>> more broadly still, “hacktivism”, meaning those who use online protest
> >>>>>>>> activity for political ends.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> The title page of one of these documents reflects the agency’s own
> >>>>>>>> awareness that it is “pushing the boundaries” by using “cyber offensive”
> >>>>>>>> techniques against people who have nothing to do with terrorism or
> >>>>>>>> national security threats, and indeed, centrally involves law
> >>>>>>>> enforcement agents who investigate ordinary crimes:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> No matter your views on Anonymous, “hacktivists” or garden-variety
> >>>>>>>> criminals, it is not difficult to see how dangerous it is to have secret
> >>>>>>>> government agencies being able to target any individuals they want – who
> >>>>>>>> have never been charged with, let alone convicted of, any crimes – with
> >>>>>>>> these sorts of online, deception-based tactics of reputation destruction
> >>>>>>>> and disruption. There is a strong argument to make, as Jay Leiderman
> >>>>>>>> demonstrated in the Guardian in the context of the Paypal 14 hacktivist
> >>>>>>>> persecution, that the “denial of service” tactics used by hacktivists
> >>>>>>>> result in (at most) trivial damage (far less than the cyber-warfare
> >>>>>>>> tactics favored by the US and UK) and are far more akin to the type of
> >>>>>>>> political protest protected by the First Amendment.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> The broader point is that, far beyond hacktivists, these surveillance
> >>>>>>>> agencies have vested themselves with the power to deliberately ruin
> >>>>>>>> people’s reputations and disrupt their online political activity even
> >>>>>>>> though they’ve been charged with no crimes, and even though their
> >>>>>>>> actions have no conceivable connection to terrorism or even national
> >>>>>>>> security threats. As Anonymous expert Gabriella Coleman of McGill
> >>>>>>>> University told me, “targeting Anonymous and hacktivists amounts to
> >>>>>>>> targeting citizens for expressing their political beliefs, resulting in
> >>>>>>>> the stifling of legitimate dissent.” Pointing to this study she
> >>>>>>>> published, Professor Coleman vehemently contested the assertion that
> >>>>>>>> “there is anything terrorist/violent in their actions.”
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Government plans to monitor and influence internet communications, and
> >>>>>>>> covertly infiltrate online communities in order to sow dissension and
> >>>>>>>> disseminate false information, have long been the source of speculation.
> >>>>>>>> Harvard Law Professor Cass Sunstein, a close Obama adviser and the White
> >>>>>>>> House’s former head of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs,
> >>>>>>>> wrote a controversial paper in 2008 proposing that the US government
> >>>>>>>> employ teams of covert agents and pseudo-”independent” advocates to
> >>>>>>>> “cognitively infiltrate” online groups and websites, as well as other
> >>>>>>>> activist groups.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Sunstein also proposed sending covert agents into “chat rooms, online
> >>>>>>>> social networks, or even real-space groups” which spread what he views
> >>>>>>>> as false and damaging “conspiracy theories” about the government.
> >>>>>>>> Ironically, the very same Sunstein was recently named by Obama to serve
> >>>>>>>> as a member of the NSA review panel created by the White House, one that
> >>>>>>>> – while disputing key NSA claims – proceeded to propose many cosmetic
> >>>>>>>> reforms to the agency’s powers (most of which were ignored by the
> >>>>>>>> President who appointed them).
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> But these GCHQ documents are the first to prove that a major western
> >>>>>>>> government is using some of the most controversial techniques to
> >>>>>>>> disseminate deception online and harm the reputations of targets.. Under
> >>>>>>>> the tactics they use, the state is deliberately spreading lies on the
> >>>>>>>> internet about whichever individuals it targets, including the use of
> >>>>>>>> what GCHQ itself calls “false flag operations” and emails to people’s
> >>>>>>>> families and friends. Who would possibly trust a government to exercise
> >>>>>>>> these powers at all, let alone do so in secret, with virtually no
> >>>>>>>> oversight, and outside of any cognizable legal framework?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Then there is the use of psychology and other social sciences to not
> >>>>>>>> only understand, but shape and control, how online activism and
> >>>>>>>> discourse unfolds. Today’s newly published document touts the work of
> >>>>>>>> GCHQ’s “Human Science Operations Cell,” devoted to “online human
> >>>>>>>> intelligence” and “strategic influence and disruption”:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> "Does the subcontinental patient keep on raving because he feels so inconsequential, doctor...." RH
> >
> > "It is the only way the patient can come to terms with the hideous smallness of his existence, nurse...." RH

On Monday, October 11, 2021 at 10:59:40 PM UTC-7, FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer wrote:
- flush -