Message-ID:

6 May, 2024: The networking issue during the past two days has been identified and fixed.

aus+uk / aus.cars / Re: Old tech vs New tech

Re: Old tech vs New tech

<cfc1be50-afa7-4cfb-95c1-4f47f4a8e220n@googlegroups.com>

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=17195&group=aus.cars#17195

X-Received: by 2002:ad4:5ae6:0:b0:472:f085:853d with SMTP id c6-20020ad45ae6000000b00472f085853dmr13965189qvh.14.1657929829242;
Fri, 15 Jul 2022 17:03:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:1313:b0:335:cad6:715c with SMTP id
y19-20020a056808131300b00335cad6715cmr8657935oiv.130.1657929828855; Fri, 15
Jul 2022 17:03:48 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: aus.cars
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2022 17:03:48 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <m0qmqah00b4sh9qffktta9qaf6cjno1sdm@4ax.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=58.104.245.136; posting-account=3Qg56goAAADSaWPQ6NnYAHfQyWVLEPyL
NNTP-Posting-Host: 58.104.245.136
References: <5db42a28-94cd-43fb-8f52-43d47d90ea7b@googlegroups.com>
<mnn3bc$3j4$1@dont-email.me> <f6564702-a7e4-4534-87e1-c3c5f48d760a@googlegroups.com>
<mnnops$lrt$1@dont-email.me> <demgqa1p5tjrn6titqql479c40bharn5dr@4ax.com>
<mo9nv3$lj0$1@dont-email.me> <m0qmqah00b4sh9qffktta9qaf6cjno1sdm@4ax.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <cfc1be50-afa7-4cfb-95c1-4f47f4a8e220n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Old tech vs New tech
From: taska...@gmail.com (Tas Karas)
Injection-Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2022 00:03:49 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 22

by: Tas Karas - Sat, 16 Jul 2022 00:03 UTC

On Sunday, July 19, 2015 at 7:05:01 PM UTC+10, Paul Saccani wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 12:08:17 +1000, Noddy <m...@wardengineering.com>
> wrote:
> >On 17/07/15 11:28 AM, Paul Saccani wrote:
> >
> >> Just a quick note, though - Jason wanted to compare with the OHC six
> >> (presumably in line with his current ride), so probably didn't have
> >> the Barra in mind.
> >
> >I think he was comparing the original 265 Hemi to his current ED engine
> >because that's what he has under his right foot at the moment, but I'm
> >not sure if he was looking to do that specifically or just limiting
> >things to that era as that's the limit of his experience.
> >
> >I was just saying that if he wishes to compare old to new then there's
> >no time like the present, and engines have come a long way just in the
> >20 years between his ED and the current Barra engine let alone between
> >his 20 year old engine and the one 20 years before that.
> Indeed.
> --
> Cheers,
> Paul Saccani
> Perth, Western Australia.