As I have pointed out already Rafiq is a mediocrity who was given in all formats was given a good a run, viz:

FC 39
List A 35
T20 95

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/cricket/2021/11/10/letter-reveals-yorkshire-staffs-extreme-hurt-problematic-azeem/?li_source=LI&li_medium=liftigniter-rhr

Letter reveals Yorkshire staff's 'extreme hurt' over 'problematic' Azeem Rafiq's 'mission to bring down club'
Exclusive: Staff hit out at club response, describe profound physical and emotional impact and say Rafiq did not share ‘White Rose values’

By
Tom Morgan,
SPORTS NEWS CORRESPONDENT
10 November 2021 • 9:00pm

A delegation of Yorkshire staff wrote to their board last month to bitterly complain about the club's failure to stand up to Azeem Rafiq's "one-man mission to bring down the club".

In a letter seen by Telegraph Sport, signatories criticise Rafiq's behaviour at the club and even express fury over an apology issued when it was revealed seven of his 43 abuse claims were proven.

The correspondence, sent out on Oct 14, lays bare for the first time the "extreme hurt" of staff, who felt they and the club were facing unfair attacks amid the toxic legal row that has engulfed them.

"Staff who knew Azeem well felt that an initial apology to him and an acceptance that he was a victim was not the correct approach and misrepresented entirely what kind of individual he was whilst at the club," the letter says.

"There are endless episodes of Azeem’s behaviour, well-known to the club, which reflect on him as a person well before he decided to accuse the club, staff and players of any wrongdoing. We find it difficult to comprehend how this part of Azeem’s character has not been released or at least used by the club in its defence."
In T20 cricket, Rafiq's stats compare favourably with rivals, having taken 102 wickets across 95 matches during his career. However, in the staff's assessment, the off-spinner, who this week agreed a six-figure payout over his claims, had under-performed. The authors add: "Azeem "is a complex character. He had and demanded, very significant and constant staff support whilst at the club... He became an under-performer on the field, he was problematic in the dressing room."

Read more at https://www.telegraph.co.uk/cricket/2021/11/10/letter-reveals-yorkshire-staffs-extreme-hurt-problematic-azeem/?li_source=LI&li_medium=liftigniter-rhr

RH

On Thursday, November 11, 2021 at 8:08:05 AM UTC, RH wrote:

> The correspondence, sent out on Oct 14, lays bare for the first time the "extreme hurt" of staff, who felt they and the club were facing unfair attacks amid the toxic legal row that has engulfed them.
>
> "Staff who knew Azeem well felt that an initial apology to him and an acceptance that he was a victim was not the correct approach and misrepresented entirely what kind of individual he was whilst at the club," the letter says.
>
> "There are endless episodes of Azeem’s behaviour, well-known to the club, which reflect on him as a person well before he decided to accuse the club, staff and players of any wrongdoing. We find it difficult to comprehend how this part of Azeem’s character has not been released or at least used by the club in its defence."
> Read more at https://www.telegraph.co.uk/cricket/2021/11/10/letter-reveals-yorkshire-staffs-extreme-hurt-problematic-azeem/?li_source=LI&li_medium=liftigniter-rhr
>

the backlash begins..

mike

In message <bc17290a-d4ae-48b4-babd-e28892cb517fn@googlegroups.com>,
mike <dmike204@yahoo.co.uk> writes
>On Thursday, November 11, 2021 at 8:08:05 AM UTC, RH wrote:
>
>> The correspondence, sent out on Oct 14, lays bare for the first time
>>the "extreme hurt" of staff, who felt they and the club were facing
>>unfair attacks amid the toxic legal row that has engulfed them.
>>
>> "Staff who knew Azeem well felt that an initial apology to him and an
>>acceptance that he was a victim was not the correct approach and
>>misrepresented entirely what kind of individual he was whilst at the
>>club," the letter says.
>>
>> "There are endless episodes of Azeem’s behaviour, well-known to the
>>club, which reflect on him as a person well before he decided to
>>accuse the club, staff and players of any wrongdoing. We find it
>>difficult to comprehend how this part of Azeem’s character has not
>>been released or at least used by the club in its defence."
>> Read more at
>>https://www.telegraph.co.uk/cricket/2021/11/10/letter-reveals-yorkshire
>>-staffs-extreme-hurt-problematic-azeem/?li_source=LI&li_medium=liftigni
>>ter-rhr
>>
>
>the backlash begins..
>
>mike

He may have been a bit of a bastard - none of us really knows the truth
of that - but that still wouldn't justify racist abuse. And the enquiry
that Yorkshire set up found that seven of his complaints were proved -
but oddly still decided that no one at the club should face any
sanction.
--
John Hall
"Home is heaven and orgies are vile,
But you *need* an orgy, once in a while."
Ogden Nash (1902-1971)

On Thu, 11 Nov 2021 21:21:52 +0000, John Hall
<john_nospam@jhall.co.uk> wrote:

>In message <bc17290a-d4ae-48b4-babd-e28892cb517fn@googlegroups.com>,
>mike <dmike204@yahoo.co.uk> writes
>>On Thursday, November 11, 2021 at 8:08:05 AM UTC, RH wrote:
>>
>>> The correspondence, sent out on Oct 14, lays bare for the first time
>>>the "extreme hurt" of staff, who felt they and the club were facing
>>>unfair attacks amid the toxic legal row that has engulfed them.
>>>
>>> "Staff who knew Azeem well felt that an initial apology to him and an
>>>acceptance that he was a victim was not the correct approach and
>>>misrepresented entirely what kind of individual he was whilst at the
>>>club," the letter says.
>>>
>>> "There are endless episodes of Azeem’s behaviour, well-known to the
>>>club, which reflect on him as a person well before he decided to
>>>accuse the club, staff and players of any wrongdoing. We find it
>>>difficult to comprehend how this part of Azeem’s character has not
>>>been released or at least used by the club in its defence."
>>> Read more at
>>>https://www.telegraph.co.uk/cricket/2021/11/10/letter-reveals-yorkshire
>>>-staffs-extreme-hurt-problematic-azeem/?li_source=LI&li_medium=liftigni
>>>ter-rhr
>>>
>>
>>the backlash begins..
>>
>>mike
>
>He may have been a bit of a bastard - none of us really knows the truth
>of that - but that still wouldn't justify racist abuse. And the enquiry
>that Yorkshire set up found that seven of his complaints were proved -
>but oddly still decided that no one at the club should face any
>sanction.

It reads like the staff are still at primary school and saying his
behaviour justified the abuse.
It's just denial and teeth gnashing with a very clear and obvious ad
hominem motive.

max.it

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On Thursday, November 11, 2021 at 7:08:05 PM UTC+11, RH wrote:
> As I have pointed out already Rafiq is a mediocrity who was given in all formats was given a good a run, viz:
>
> FC 39
> List A 35
> T20 95
>
> https://www.telegraph.co.uk/cricket/2021/11/10/letter-reveals-yorkshire-staffs-extreme-hurt-problematic-azeem/?li_source=LI&li_medium=liftigniter-rhr
>
> Letter reveals Yorkshire staff's 'extreme hurt' over 'problematic' Azeem Rafiq's 'mission to bring down club'
> Exclusive: Staff hit out at club response, describe profound physical and emotional impact and say Rafiq did not share ‘White Rose values’
>
> By
> Tom Morgan,
> SPORTS NEWS CORRESPONDENT
> 10 November 2021 • 9:00pm
>
> A delegation of Yorkshire staff wrote to their board last month to bitterly complain about the club's failure to stand up to Azeem Rafiq's "one-man mission to bring down the club".
>
> In a letter seen by Telegraph Sport, signatories criticise Rafiq's behaviour at the club and even express fury over an apology issued when it was revealed seven of his 43 abuse claims were proven.
>
> The correspondence, sent out on Oct 14, lays bare for the first time the "extreme hurt" of staff, who felt they and the club were facing unfair attacks amid the toxic legal row that has engulfed them.
>
> "Staff who knew Azeem well felt that an initial apology to him and an acceptance that he was a victim was not the correct approach and misrepresented entirely what kind of individual he was whilst at the club," the letter says.
>
> "There are endless episodes of Azeem’s behaviour, well-known to the club, which reflect on him as a person well before he decided to accuse the club, staff and players of any wrongdoing. We find it difficult to comprehend how this part of Azeem’s character has not been released or at least used by the club in its defence."
> In T20 cricket, Rafiq's stats compare favourably with rivals, having taken 102 wickets across 95 matches during his career. However, in the staff's assessment, the off-spinner, who this week agreed a six-figure payout over his claims, had under-performed. The authors add: "Azeem "is a complex character. He had and demanded, very significant and constant staff support whilst at the club... He became an under-performer on the field, he was problematic in the dressing room."
>
So the argument is
"Yes he was racially abused but he deserved it"?

On Thursday, 11 November 2021 at 21:56:52 UTC, max.it wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Nov 2021 21:21:52 +0000, John Hall
> <john_...@jhall.co.uk> wrote:
>
> >In message <bc17290a-d4ae-48b4...@googlegroups.com>,
> >mike <dmik...@yahoo.co.uk> writes
> >>On Thursday, November 11, 2021 at 8:08:05 AM UTC, RH wrote:
> >>
> >>> The correspondence, sent out on Oct 14, lays bare for the first time
> >>>the "extreme hurt" of staff, who felt they and the club were facing
> >>>unfair attacks amid the toxic legal row that has engulfed them.
> >>>
> >>> "Staff who knew Azeem well felt that an initial apology to him and an
> >>>acceptance that he was a victim was not the correct approach and
> >>>misrepresented entirely what kind of individual he was whilst at the
> >>>club," the letter says.
> >>>
> >>> "There are endless episodes of Azeem’s behaviour, well-known to the
> >>>club, which reflect on him as a person well before he decided to
> >>>accuse the club, staff and players of any wrongdoing. We find it
> >>>difficult to comprehend how this part of Azeem’s character has not
> >>>been released or at least used by the club in its defence."
> >>> Read more at
> >>>https://www.telegraph.co.uk/cricket/2021/11/10/letter-reveals-yorkshire
> >>>-staffs-extreme-hurt-problematic-azeem/?li_source=LI&li_medium=liftigni
> >>>ter-rhr
> >>>
> >>
> >>the backlash begins..
> >>
> >>mike
> >
> >He may have been a bit of a bastard - none of us really knows the truth
> >of that - but that still wouldn't justify racist abuse. And the enquiry
> >that Yorkshire set up found that seven of his complaints were proved -
> >but oddly still decided that no one at the club should face any
> >sanction.
> It reads like the staff are still at primary school and saying his
> behaviour justified the abuse.
> It's just denial and teeth gnashing with a very clear and obvious ad
> hominem motive.

I'm curious as to the nature of the mysterious 'White Rose values' that he is accused of not sharing.
--
David North

On Friday, November 12, 2021 at 1:44:20 PM UTC, nos...@lane-farm.fsnet.co.uk wrote:
> On Thursday, 11 November 2021 at 21:56:52 UTC, max.it wrote:
> > On Thu, 11 Nov 2021 21:21:52 +0000, John Hall
> > <john_...@jhall.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> > >In message <bc17290a-d4ae-48b4...@googlegroups.com>,
> > >mike <dmik...@yahoo.co.uk> writes
> > >>On Thursday, November 11, 2021 at 8:08:05 AM UTC, RH wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> The correspondence, sent out on Oct 14, lays bare for the first time
> > >>>the "extreme hurt" of staff, who felt they and the club were facing
> > >>>unfair attacks amid the toxic legal row that has engulfed them.
> > >>>
> > >>> "Staff who knew Azeem well felt that an initial apology to him and an
> > >>>acceptance that he was a victim was not the correct approach and
> > >>>misrepresented entirely what kind of individual he was whilst at the
> > >>>club," the letter says.
> > >>>
> > >>> "There are endless episodes of Azeem’s behaviour, well-known to the
> > >>>club, which reflect on him as a person well before he decided to
> > >>>accuse the club, staff and players of any wrongdoing. We find it
> > >>>difficult to comprehend how this part of Azeem’s character has not
> > >>>been released or at least used by the club in its defence."
> > >>> Read more at
> > >>>https://www.telegraph.co.uk/cricket/2021/11/10/letter-reveals-yorkshire
> > >>>-staffs-extreme-hurt-problematic-azeem/?li_source=LI&li_medium=liftigni
> > >>>ter-rhr
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>the backlash begins..
> > >>
> > >>mike
> > >
> > >He may have been a bit of a bastard - none of us really knows the truth
> > >of that - but that still wouldn't justify racist abuse. And the enquiry
> > >that Yorkshire set up found that seven of his complaints were proved -
> > >but oddly still decided that no one at the club should face any
> > >sanction.
> > It reads like the staff are still at primary school and saying his
> > behaviour justified the abuse.
> > It's just denial and teeth gnashing with a very clear and obvious ad
> > hominem motive.
> I'm curious as to the nature of the mysterious 'White Rose values' that he is accused of not sharing.
> --
> David North

'White Rose values' = Yorkshire patriotism. - God's own county etc ... RH

On Fri, 12 Nov 2021 05:44:19 -0800 (PST), David North
<nospam@lane-farm.fsnet.co.uk> wrote:

>On Thursday, 11 November 2021 at 21:56:52 UTC, max.it wrote:
>> On Thu, 11 Nov 2021 21:21:52 +0000, John Hall
>> <john_...@jhall.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>> >In message <bc17290a-d4ae-48b4...@googlegroups.com>,
>> >mike <dmik...@yahoo.co.uk> writes
>> >>On Thursday, November 11, 2021 at 8:08:05 AM UTC, RH wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> The correspondence, sent out on Oct 14, lays bare for the first time
>> >>>the "extreme hurt" of staff, who felt they and the club were facing
>> >>>unfair attacks amid the toxic legal row that has engulfed them.
>> >>>
>> >>> "Staff who knew Azeem well felt that an initial apology to him and an
>> >>>acceptance that he was a victim was not the correct approach and
>> >>>misrepresented entirely what kind of individual he was whilst at the
>> >>>club," the letter says.
>> >>>
>> >>> "There are endless episodes of Azeem’s behaviour, well-known to the
>> >>>club, which reflect on him as a person well before he decided to
>> >>>accuse the club, staff and players of any wrongdoing. We find it
>> >>>difficult to comprehend how this part of Azeem’s character has not
>> >>>been released or at least used by the club in its defence."
>> >>> Read more at
>> >>>https://www.telegraph.co.uk/cricket/2021/11/10/letter-reveals-yorkshire
>> >>>-staffs-extreme-hurt-problematic-azeem/?li_source=LI&li_medium=liftigni
>> >>>ter-rhr
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>the backlash begins..
>> >>
>> >>mike
>> >
>> >He may have been a bit of a bastard - none of us really knows the truth
>> >of that - but that still wouldn't justify racist abuse. And the enquiry
>> >that Yorkshire set up found that seven of his complaints were proved -
>> >but oddly still decided that no one at the club should face any
>> >sanction.
>> It reads like the staff are still at primary school and saying his
>> behaviour justified the abuse.
>> It's just denial and teeth gnashing with a very clear and obvious ad
>> hominem motive.
>
>I'm curious as to the nature of the mysterious 'White Rose values' that he is accused of not sharing.

If the white rose values are what they appear to be currently; it is
no wonder that he does not share them.

Every move this club makes seems to just shoot off another toe. Did
they expect him to participate in his own abuse?

I reckon he has had Yorkshire by the bollox for years and they have
been unable to sack him for fear of this racism thing being revealed.
It's too late now and the club are probably still in the denial phase.
Like when a saucepan boils over. A couple of drips and then a few
drops and then a couple of splashes and there isn't enough members
sitting on the lid to keep it on.

max.it

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On Friday, November 12, 2021 at 4:58:25 PM UTC, max.it wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Nov 2021 05:44:19 -0800 (PST), David North
> <nos...@lane-farm.fsnet.co.uk> wrote:
>
> >On Thursday, 11 November 2021 at 21:56:52 UTC, max.it wrote:
> >> On Thu, 11 Nov 2021 21:21:52 +0000, John Hall
> >> <john_...@jhall.co.uk> wrote:
> >>
> >> >In message <bc17290a-d4ae-48b4...@googlegroups.com>,
> >> >mike <dmik...@yahoo.co.uk> writes
> >> >>On Thursday, November 11, 2021 at 8:08:05 AM UTC, RH wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> The correspondence, sent out on Oct 14, lays bare for the first time
> >> >>>the "extreme hurt" of staff, who felt they and the club were facing
> >> >>>unfair attacks amid the toxic legal row that has engulfed them.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> "Staff who knew Azeem well felt that an initial apology to him and an
> >> >>>acceptance that he was a victim was not the correct approach and
> >> >>>misrepresented entirely what kind of individual he was whilst at the
> >> >>>club," the letter says.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> "There are endless episodes of Azeem’s behaviour, well-known to the
> >> >>>club, which reflect on him as a person well before he decided to
> >> >>>accuse the club, staff and players of any wrongdoing. We find it
> >> >>>difficult to comprehend how this part of Azeem’s character has not
> >> >>>been released or at least used by the club in its defence."
> >> >>> Read more at
> >> >>>https://www.telegraph.co.uk/cricket/2021/11/10/letter-reveals-yorkshire
> >> >>>-staffs-extreme-hurt-problematic-azeem/?li_source=LI&li_medium=liftigni
> >> >>>ter-rhr
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >>the backlash begins..
> >> >>
> >> >>mike
> >> >
> >> >He may have been a bit of a bastard - none of us really knows the truth
> >> >of that - but that still wouldn't justify racist abuse. And the enquiry
> >> >that Yorkshire set up found that seven of his complaints were proved -
> >> >but oddly still decided that no one at the club should face any
> >> >sanction.
> >> It reads like the staff are still at primary school and saying his
> >> behaviour justified the abuse.
> >> It's just denial and teeth gnashing with a very clear and obvious ad
> >> hominem motive.
> >
> >I'm curious as to the nature of the mysterious 'White Rose values' that he is accused of not sharing.
> If the white rose values are what they appear to be currently; it is
> no wonder that he does not share them.
>
> Every move this club makes seems to just shoot off another toe. Did
> they expect him to participate in his own abuse?
>
> I reckon he has had Yorkshire by the bollox for years and they have
> been unable to sack him for fear of this racism thing being revealed.
> It's too late now and the club are probably still in the denial phase.

well they sacked him in 2014, but its interesting they rehired him
in 2016. Why would they rehire someone who according to the
anti rafiq narrative, was a mediocre underachiever who was already
considered a troublemaker and a bastard in the dressing room by
players and staff, and give him his county cap as well! They
sacked him again in 2018.

anyway hes had his payoff already apparently. according to what i read
yorks have paid him over £100,000.

mike

On Fri, 12 Nov 2021 09:18:10 -0800 (PST), mike <dmike204@yahoo.co.uk>
wrote:

>On Friday, November 12, 2021 at 4:58:25 PM UTC, max.it wrote:
>> On Fri, 12 Nov 2021 05:44:19 -0800 (PST), David North
>> <nos...@lane-farm.fsnet.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>> >On Thursday, 11 November 2021 at 21:56:52 UTC, max.it wrote:
>> >> On Thu, 11 Nov 2021 21:21:52 +0000, John Hall
>> >> <john_...@jhall.co.uk> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >In message <bc17290a-d4ae-48b4...@googlegroups.com>,
>> >> >mike <dmik...@yahoo.co.uk> writes
>> >> >>On Thursday, November 11, 2021 at 8:08:05 AM UTC, RH wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>> The correspondence, sent out on Oct 14, lays bare for the first time
>> >> >>>the "extreme hurt" of staff, who felt they and the club were facing
>> >> >>>unfair attacks amid the toxic legal row that has engulfed them.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> "Staff who knew Azeem well felt that an initial apology to him and an
>> >> >>>acceptance that he was a victim was not the correct approach and
>> >> >>>misrepresented entirely what kind of individual he was whilst at the
>> >> >>>club," the letter says.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> "There are endless episodes of Azeem’s behaviour, well-known to the
>> >> >>>club, which reflect on him as a person well before he decided to
>> >> >>>accuse the club, staff and players of any wrongdoing. We find it
>> >> >>>difficult to comprehend how this part of Azeem’s character has not
>> >> >>>been released or at least used by the club in its defence."
>> >> >>> Read more at
>> >> >>>https://www.telegraph.co.uk/cricket/2021/11/10/letter-reveals-yorkshire
>> >> >>>-staffs-extreme-hurt-problematic-azeem/?li_source=LI&li_medium=liftigni
>> >> >>>ter-rhr
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>the backlash begins..
>> >> >>
>> >> >>mike
>> >> >
>> >> >He may have been a bit of a bastard - none of us really knows the truth
>> >> >of that - but that still wouldn't justify racist abuse. And the enquiry
>> >> >that Yorkshire set up found that seven of his complaints were proved -
>> >> >but oddly still decided that no one at the club should face any
>> >> >sanction.
>> >> It reads like the staff are still at primary school and saying his
>> >> behaviour justified the abuse.
>> >> It's just denial and teeth gnashing with a very clear and obvious ad
>> >> hominem motive.
>> >
>> >I'm curious as to the nature of the mysterious 'White Rose values' that he is accused of not sharing.
>> If the white rose values are what they appear to be currently; it is
>> no wonder that he does not share them.
>>
>> Every move this club makes seems to just shoot off another toe. Did
>> they expect him to participate in his own abuse?
>>
>> I reckon he has had Yorkshire by the bollox for years and they have
>> been unable to sack him for fear of this racism thing being revealed.
>> It's too late now and the club are probably still in the denial phase.
>
>well they sacked him in 2014, but its interesting they rehired him
>in 2016. Why would they rehire someone who according to the
>anti rafiq narrative, was a mediocre underachiever who was already
>considered a troublemaker and a bastard in the dressing room by
>players and staff, and give him his county cap as well! They
>sacked him again in 2018.
>
>anyway hes had his payoff already apparently. according to what i read
>yorks have paid him over £100,000.
>
>mike

I didn't know he'd been sacked, I thought he had just went elsewhere.
It doesn't sound any better, it sounds as if he's already had a couple
of backhanders.

max.it

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

In message <hr9togpoaa64sh5vo0noqrtm05j6o7c4u5@4ax.com>, max. it
<max@tea.time> writes
>On Fri, 12 Nov 2021 09:18:10 -0800 (PST), mike <dmike204@yahoo.co.uk>
>wrote:
>>
>>well they sacked him in 2014, but its interesting they rehired him
>>in 2016. Why would they rehire someone who according to the
>>anti rafiq narrative, was a mediocre underachiever who was already
>>considered a troublemaker and a bastard in the dressing room by
>>players and staff, and give him his county cap as well! They
>>sacked him again in 2018.
>>
>>anyway hes had his payoff already apparently. according to what i read
>>yorks have paid him over £100,000.
>>
>>mike
>
>I didn't know he'd been sacked, I thought he had just went elsewhere.
>It doesn't sound any better, it sounds as if he's already had a couple
>of backhanders.
>
>max.it
>

IIRC, I read that they had given him compassionate leave because his
young son had died, and then sacked him while he was still away on that,
which doesn't look good.
--
John Hall
"Home is heaven and orgies are vile,
But you *need* an orgy, once in a while."
Ogden Nash (1902-1971)

On Fri, 12 Nov 2021 19:07:21 +0000, John Hall
<john_nospam@jhall.co.uk> wrote:

>In message <hr9togpoaa64sh5vo0noqrtm05j6o7c4u5@4ax.com>, max. it
><max@tea.time> writes
>>On Fri, 12 Nov 2021 09:18:10 -0800 (PST), mike <dmike204@yahoo.co.uk>
>>wrote:
>>>
>>>well they sacked him in 2014, but its interesting they rehired him
>>>in 2016. Why would they rehire someone who according to the
>>>anti rafiq narrative, was a mediocre underachiever who was already
>>>considered a troublemaker and a bastard in the dressing room by
>>>players and staff, and give him his county cap as well! They
>>>sacked him again in 2018.
>>>
>>>anyway hes had his payoff already apparently. according to what i read
>>>yorks have paid him over £100,000.
>>>
>>>mike
>>
>>I didn't know he'd been sacked, I thought he had just went elsewhere.
>>It doesn't sound any better, it sounds as if he's already had a couple
>>of backhanders.
>>
>>max.it
>>
>
>IIRC, I read that they had given him compassionate leave because his
>young son had died, and then sacked him while he was still away on that,
>which doesn't look good.

I read that the YCCC whistleblower hotline opens on Monday.
Surely that'll attract a fair few crank calls and lunatics.

max.it

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On Friday, November 12, 2021 at 7:25:10 PM UTC, max.it wrote:
> I read that the YCCC whistleblower hotline opens on Monday.
> Surely that'll attract a fair few crank calls and lunatics.
> max.it

Oh great, another witch hunt. What a daft idea.

mike