https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-05-06/jarryd-hayne-sentenced-for-sexual-assault/100120002

Former NRL star Jarryd Hayne has been sentenced to five years and nine
months in jail.

I think he should appeal the conviction, or the sentence at least. It
was a female judge which may have introduced a bias to proceedings.
This is the advantage of an appeals court where you have more than one
gender on the judging panel.

On Thu, 06 May 2021 19:18:28 +1000, Max scribed:

> https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-05-06/jarryd-hayne-sentenced-for-
sexual-assault/100120002
>
> Former NRL star Jarryd Hayne has been sentenced to five years and nine
> months in jail.
>
> I think he should appeal the conviction, or the sentence at least.

You are aware that he has form in another country for the same thing?

> It
> was a female judge which may have introduced a bias to proceedings.

Bullshit.

> This is the advantage of an appeals court where you have more than one
> gender on the judging panel.

They might decide the sentence was too lenient.

On 06-May-21 7:18 pm, Max wrote:
> https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-05-06/jarryd-hayne-sentenced-for-sexual-assault/100120002
>
>
> Former NRL star Jarryd Hayne has been sentenced to five years and nine
> months in jail.
>
> I think he should appeal the conviction, or the sentence at least.  It
> was a female judge which may have introduced a bias to proceedings. This
> is the advantage of an appeals court where you have more than one gender
> on the judging panel.

The appeal could wouldn't change it unless it was deemed manifestly
excessive. Merely being on the high side (if it is) won't be sufficient.

Sylvia.

Max the Wog Cunt wrote:
=====================

" I'm basically here to stir things up and create entertainment for myself."

...... Phil

Phil Allison <pallison49@gmail.com> wrote

> " I'm basically here to stir things up and create entertainment for
> myself."

We know that, Philthy.

On 6/05/2021 9:57 pm, Phil Allison wrote:
> Max the Wog Cunt wrote:
> =====================
>
>
> " I'm basically here to stir things up and create entertainment for myself."
>

What's wrong with that? It's a free and open newsgroup.

Max the Wog Cunt wrote:
=====================

> >
> > " I'm basically here to stir things up and create entertainment for myself."
> >
> What's wrong with that? It's a free and open newsgroup.
>
>
** Trolling is not allowed on ANY newsgroup.
Trolling DESTROYS newsgrups.

Your comment is the very definition of trolling.

FOAD you wog idiot.

Phil Allison <pallison49@gmail.com> wrote
> Max wrote
>> Phil Allison <pallison49@gmail.com> wrote

>>> " I'm basically here to stir things up and create entertainment for
>>> myself."

>> What's wrong with that? It's a free and open newsgroup.

> Trolling is not allowed on ANY newsgroup.

Even sillier than you usually manage and that’s saying something.

> Trolling DESTROYS newsgrups.

Yes you have.

> Your comment is the very definition of trolling.

Wrong, as always.

On 6/05/2021 9:45 pm, Sylvia Else wrote:
> On 06-May-21 7:18 pm, Max wrote:
>> https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-05-06/jarryd-hayne-sentenced-for-sexual-assault/100120002
>>
>>
>> Former NRL star Jarryd Hayne has been sentenced to five years and nine
>> months in jail.
>>
>> I think he should appeal the conviction, or the sentence at least.  It
>> was a female judge which may have introduced a bias to proceedings.
>> This is the advantage of an appeals court where you have more than one
>> gender on the judging panel.
>
> The appeal could wouldn't change it unless it was deemed manifestly
> excessive. Merely being on the high side (if it is) won't be sufficient.
>
> Sylvia.

Is it on the high side? Isn't the maximum sentence 14 years?

On 5/7/2021 4:06 PM, Dechucka wrote:
> On 6/05/2021 9:45 pm, Sylvia Else wrote:
>> On 06-May-21 7:18 pm, Max wrote:
>>> https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-05-06/jarryd-hayne-sentenced-for-sexual-assault/100120002
>>>
>>>
>>> Former NRL star Jarryd Hayne has been sentenced to five years and
>>> nine months in jail.
>>>
>>> I think he should appeal the conviction, or the sentence at least. 
>>> It was a female judge which may have introduced a bias to
>>> proceedings. This is the advantage of an appeals court where you
>>> have more than one gender on the judging panel.
>>
>> The appeal could wouldn't change it unless it was deemed manifestly
>> excessive. Merely being on the high side (if it is) won't be sufficient.
>>
>> Sylvia.
>
>
> Is it on the high side? Isn't the maximum sentence 14 years?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

In this case I reckon its OTT. This:

He said the woman sent messages to Mr Hayne in the 45 minutes after the
alleged assault, including "I’m hurting so much" and "I didn't want to
do that after knowing the taxi was waiting for you. I thought you would
have at least stayed. I'm hurting really badly, I told my mum that you
got a nose bleed but I'm sitting here in my room crying because I feel
weird".

SO, it was all go until she knew about the taxi.... (They were *both*
there for sex after all) so his er *crime* was to approach the scenario
like a bull in a chinashop. More fool him. Four+ yrs.?? Bullshit. Hope
he appeals severity!!.

Jarryd Hayne leaves court this week.

Jarryd Hayne leaves court this week.CREDIT:RHETT WYMAN

The woman was examined by a doctor in the days afterwards, however she
did not wish to make a police complaint. Police became involved when her
brother-in-law found out what happened and contacted a sports journalist
for advice.

The brother-in-law then contacted the NRL integrity unit, which
appointed its own investigator and ultimately notified police. Mr Hayne
was arrested and charged in November 2018.

During their investigation police intercepted a phone call between Mr
Hayne and another NRL player, where he said the woman was "filthy
because the cab was out the front".

Mr Hayne said he "watched some of the grand final with her old girl" and
when the woman began bleeding he said his fingernail must have nicked her.

Defence barrister Phillip Boulten, SC, said his client is not guilty. He
said there are two sides to the story of what happened in the bedroom,
and Mr Hayne will tell his side when he gives evidence next week.

"What happened in that bedroom was entirely consensual. The complainant
consented to what happened, even after she became unhappy about the taxi
being present. She was quite prepared to engage in sexual activity with
Jarryd Hayne," Mr Boulten said.

"Not only was she prepared to do it, she did it ... unfortunately, as
you’ve heard, it didn’t go very well. During the course of the activity
Mr Hayne scratched her, by the look of it, with a fingernail, and it
caused bleeding.

"It was not a happy ending for either of them."

Mr Boulten said the woman had sent naked and lingerie photos to Mr Hayne
on Snapchat before they met in person, and although it was "regrettable
form" for Mr Hayne to leave a taxi waiting outside the home, "they both
intended to have sex".

"It was not going to be romantic, unfortunately," Mr Boulten said.

"[She] did not say no, she did not say stop, she did not do anything to
indicate she was not consenting – in fact the exact opposite, she was
enjoying what was happening. Until they saw blood."

Mr Boulten said there is "no doubt" his client caused the bleeding, but
it was an accident and he never intended to harm the woman.

He said the woman told Mr Hayne "I’m sorry, I don’t know why I’m
bleeding" and Mr Hayne responded, "Don’t worry, it’s probably my
fingernail that has scratched you, it’ll be all right".

The trial continues.

On Fri, 07 May 2021 19:06:54 +1000, jonz scribed:

> On 5/7/2021 4:06 PM, Dechucka wrote:
>> On 6/05/2021 9:45 pm, Sylvia Else wrote:
>>> On 06-May-21 7:18 pm, Max wrote:
>>>> https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-05-06/jarryd-hayne-sentenced-for-
sexual-assault/100120002
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Former NRL star Jarryd Hayne has been sentenced to five years and
>>>> nine months in jail.
>>>>
>>>> I think he should appeal the conviction, or the sentence at least.
>>>> It was a female judge which may have introduced a bias to
>>>> proceedings. This is the advantage of an appeals court where you have
>>>> more than one gender on the judging panel.
>>>
>>> The appeal could wouldn't change it unless it was deemed manifestly
>>> excessive. Merely being on the high side (if it is) won't be
>>> sufficient.
>>>
>>> Sylvia.
>>
>>
>> Is it on the high side? Isn't the maximum sentence 14 years?
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> In this case I reckon its OTT. This:
>.......................
>
> The trial continues.

No mate, it is over and done with and he is in the clanger.
The jury decided, the judge sentenced and now he is doing time.

On 5/7/2021 7:53 PM, News 2021 wrote:
> On Fri, 07 May 2021 19:06:54 +1000, jonz scribed:
>
>> On 5/7/2021 4:06 PM, Dechucka wrote:
>>> On 6/05/2021 9:45 pm, Sylvia Else wrote:
>>>> On 06-May-21 7:18 pm, Max wrote:
>>>>> https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-05-06/jarryd-hayne-sentenced-for-
> sexual-assault/100120002
>>>>>
>>>>> Former NRL star Jarryd Hayne has been sentenced to five years and
>>>>> nine months in jail.
>>>>>
>>>>> I think he should appeal the conviction, or the sentence at least.
>>>>> It was a female judge which may have introduced a bias to
>>>>> proceedings. This is the advantage of an appeals court where you have
>>>>> more than one gender on the judging panel.
>>>> The appeal could wouldn't change it unless it was deemed manifestly
>>>> excessive. Merely being on the high side (if it is) won't be
>>>> sufficient.
>>>>
>>>> Sylvia.
>>>
>>> Is it on the high side? Isn't the maximum sentence 14 years?
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>
>> In this case I reckon its OTT. This:
>> .......................
>>
>> The trial continues.
> No mate, it is over and done with and he is in the clanger.
> The jury decided, the judge sentenced and now he is doing time.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I neglected to erase that line!. My bad.   This time Leave the poast
alone you old fool!....

     In this case I reckon its OTT. This:

He (Mr Costello) said the woman sent messages to Mr Hayne in the 45
minutes after the alleged assault, including "I’m hurting so much" and
"I didn't want to do that after knowing the taxi was waiting for you. I
thought you would have at least stayed. I'm hurting really badly, I told
my mum that you got a nose bleed but I'm sitting here in my room crying
because I feel weird".
-----------------//--------------------
SO, it was all go until she knew about the taxi.... (They were *both*
there for sex after all) so his er *crime* was to approach the scenario
like a bull in a china shop. More fool him. Four+ yrs.?? Bullshit. Hope
he appeals severity!!.

The woman was examined by a doctor in the days afterwards, however she
did not wish to make a police complaint. Police became involved when her
brother-in-law found out what happened and contacted a sports journalist
for advice.

The brother-in-law then contacted the NRL integrity unit, which
appointed its own investigator and ultimately notified police. Mr Hayne
was arrested and charged in November 2018.

During their investigation police intercepted a phone call between Mr
Hayne and another NRL player, where he said the woman was "filthy
because the cab was out the front".

Mr Hayne said he "watched some of the grand final with her old girl" and
when the woman began bleeding he said his fingernail must have nicked her.

Defence barrister Phillip Boulten, SC, said his client is not guilty. He
said there are two sides to the story of what happened in the bedroom,
and Mr Hayne will tell his side when he gives evidence next week.

"What happened in that bedroom was entirely consensual. The complainant
consented to what happened, even after she became unhappy about the taxi
being present. She was quite prepared to engage in sexual activity with
Jarryd Hayne," Mr Boulten said.

"Not only was she prepared to do it, she did it ... unfortunately, as
you’ve heard, it didn’t go very well. During the course of the activity
Mr Hayne scratched her, by the look of it, with a fingernail, and it
caused bleeding.

"It was not a happy ending for either of them."

Mr Boulten said the woman had sent naked and lingerie photos to Mr Hayne
on Snapchat before they met in person, and although it was "regrettable
form" for Mr Hayne to leave a taxi waiting outside the home, "they both
intended to have sex".

"It was not going to be romantic, unfortunately," Mr Boulten said.

"[She] did not say no, she did not say stop, she did not do anything to
indicate she was not consenting – in fact the exact opposite, she was
enjoying what was happening. Until they saw blood."

Mr Boulten said there is "no doubt" his client caused the bleeding, but
it was an accident and he never intended to harm the woman.

He said the woman told Mr Hayne "I’m sorry, I don’t know why I’m
bleeding" and Mr Hayne responded, "Don’t worry, it’s probably my
fingernail that has scratched you, it’ll be all right".

>

On Fri, 07 May 2021 20:50:59 +1000, jonz scribed:

> On 5/7/2021 7:53 PM, News 2021 wrote:
>> On Fri, 07 May 2021 19:06:54 +1000, jonz scribed:
>>
>>> On 5/7/2021 4:06 PM, Dechucka wrote:
>>>> On 6/05/2021 9:45 pm, Sylvia Else wrote:
>>>>> On 06-May-21 7:18 pm, Max wrote:
>>>>>> https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-05-06/jarryd-hayne-sentenced-for-
>> sexual-assault/100120002
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Former NRL star Jarryd Hayne has been sentenced to five years and
>>>>>> nine months in jail.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think he should appeal the conviction, or the sentence at least.
>>>>>> It was a female judge which may have introduced a bias to
>>>>>> proceedings. This is the advantage of an appeals court where you
>>>>>> have more than one gender on the judging panel.
>>>>> The appeal could wouldn't change it unless it was deemed manifestly
>>>>> excessive. Merely being on the high side (if it is) won't be
>>>>> sufficient.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sylvia.
>>>>
>>>> Is it on the high side? Isn't the maximum sentence 14 years?
>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>
>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>
>>> In this case I reckon its OTT. This:
>>> .......................
>>>
>>> The trial continues.
>> No mate, it is over and done with and he is in the clanger. The jury
>> decided, the judge sentenced and now he is doing time.
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> I neglected to erase that line!. My bad.   This time Leave the poast
> alone you old fool!....

roast perhaps?

No mate, it is over and done with and he is in the clanger. The jury
decided, the judge sentenced and now he is doing time.

On 7/05/2021 9:24 pm, News 2021 wrote:
> On Fri, 07 May 2021 20:50:59 +1000, jonz scribed:
>
>> On 5/7/2021 7:53 PM, News 2021 wrote:
>>> On Fri, 07 May 2021 19:06:54 +1000, jonz scribed:
>>>
>>>> On 5/7/2021 4:06 PM, Dechucka wrote:
>>>>> On 6/05/2021 9:45 pm, Sylvia Else wrote:
>>>>>> On 06-May-21 7:18 pm, Max wrote:
>>>>>>> https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-05-06/jarryd-hayne-sentenced-for-
>>> sexual-assault/100120002
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Former NRL star Jarryd Hayne has been sentenced to five years and
>>>>>>> nine months in jail.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think he should appeal the conviction, or the sentence at least.
>>>>>>> It was a female judge which may have introduced a bias to
>>>>>>> proceedings. This is the advantage of an appeals court where you
>>>>>>> have more than one gender on the judging panel.
>>>>>> The appeal could wouldn't change it unless it was deemed manifestly
>>>>>> excessive. Merely being on the high side (if it is) won't be
>>>>>> sufficient.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sylvia.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is it on the high side? Isn't the maximum sentence 14 years?
>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>
>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>
>>>> In this case I reckon its OTT. This:
>>>> .......................
>>>>
>>>> The trial continues.
>>> No mate, it is over and done with and he is in the clanger. The jury
>>> decided, the judge sentenced and now he is doing time.
>>
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>
>> I neglected to erase that line!. My bad.   This time Leave the poast
>> alone you old fool!....
>
> roast perhaps?
>
> No mate, it is over and done with and he is in the clanger. The jury
> decided, the judge sentenced and now he is doing time.
>

It can be appealed, both the conviction and the sentence. Just like
Cardinal George Pell successfully appealed his conviction and now is
totally exonerated.

On Fri, 07 May 2021 22:41:13 +1000, Max scribed:

> On 7/05/2021 9:24 pm, News 2021 wrote:
>> On Fri, 07 May 2021 20:50:59 +1000, jonz scribed:
>>
>>> On 5/7/2021 7:53 PM, News 2021 wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 07 May 2021 19:06:54 +1000, jonz scribed:
>>>>
>>>>> On 5/7/2021 4:06 PM, Dechucka wrote:
>>>>>> On 6/05/2021 9:45 pm, Sylvia Else wrote:
>>>>>>> On 06-May-21 7:18 pm, Max wrote:
>>>>>>>> https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-05-06/jarryd-hayne-sentenced-
for-
>>>> sexual-assault/100120002
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Former NRL star Jarryd Hayne has been sentenced to five years and
>>>>>>>> nine months in jail.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I think he should appeal the conviction, or the sentence at
>>>>>>>> least.
>>>>>>>> It was a female judge which may have introduced a bias to
>>>>>>>> proceedings. This is the advantage of an appeals court where you
>>>>>>>> have more than one gender on the judging panel.
>>>>>>> The appeal could wouldn't change it unless it was deemed
>>>>>>> manifestly excessive. Merely being on the high side (if it is)
>>>>>>> won't be sufficient.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sylvia.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is it on the high side? Isn't the maximum sentence 14 years?
>>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>>
>>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>>
>>>>> In this case I reckon its OTT. This:
>>>>> .......................
>>>>>
>>>>> The trial continues.
>>>> No mate, it is over and done with and he is in the clanger. The jury
>>>> decided, the judge sentenced and now he is doing time.
>>>
>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>
>>> I neglected to erase that line!. My bad.   This time Leave the poast
>>> alone you old fool!....
>>
>> roast perhaps?
>>
>> No mate, it is over and done with and he is in the clanger. The jury
>> decided, the judge sentenced and now he is doing time.
>>
>>
> It can be appealed, both the conviction and the sentence. Just like
> Cardinal George Pell successfully appealed his conviction and now is
> totally exonerated.

He is not totally exonerated. The stench will always e there.

"Max" <max@val.morgan> wrote in message news:s73ch7$1ohc$1@gioia.aioe.org...
> On 7/05/2021 9:24 pm, News 2021 wrote:
>> On Fri, 07 May 2021 20:50:59 +1000, jonz scribed:
>>
>>> On 5/7/2021 7:53 PM, News 2021 wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 07 May 2021 19:06:54 +1000, jonz scribed:
>>>>
>>>>> On 5/7/2021 4:06 PM, Dechucka wrote:
>>>>>> On 6/05/2021 9:45 pm, Sylvia Else wrote:
>>>>>>> On 06-May-21 7:18 pm, Max wrote:
>>>>>>>> https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-05-06/jarryd-hayne-sentenced-for-
>>>> sexual-assault/100120002
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Former NRL star Jarryd Hayne has been sentenced to five years and
>>>>>>>> nine months in jail.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I think he should appeal the conviction, or the sentence at least.
>>>>>>>> It was a female judge which may have introduced a bias to
>>>>>>>> proceedings. This is the advantage of an appeals court where you
>>>>>>>> have more than one gender on the judging panel.
>>>>>>> The appeal could wouldn't change it unless it was deemed manifestly
>>>>>>> excessive. Merely being on the high side (if it is) won't be
>>>>>>> sufficient.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sylvia.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is it on the high side? Isn't the maximum sentence 14 years?
>>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>>
>>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>>
>>>>> In this case I reckon its OTT. This:
>>>>> .......................
>>>>>
>>>>> The trial continues.
>>>> No mate, it is over and done with and he is in the clanger. The jury
>>>> decided, the judge sentenced and now he is doing time.
>>>
>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>
>>> I neglected to erase that line!. My bad. This time Leave the poast
>>> alone you old fool!....
>>
>> roast perhaps?
>>
>> No mate, it is over and done with and he is in the clanger. The jury
>> decided, the judge sentenced and now he is doing time.

> It can be appealed, both the conviction and the sentence. Just like
> Cardinal George Pell successfully appealed his conviction and now is
> totally exonerated.

Nope, we know he did it. And so does he.

On 7/05/2021 11:28 pm, News 2021 wrote:
> On Fri, 07 May 2021 22:41:13 +1000, Max scribed:
>
>> On 7/05/2021 9:24 pm, News 2021 wrote:
>>> On Fri, 07 May 2021 20:50:59 +1000, jonz scribed:
>>>
>>>> On 5/7/2021 7:53 PM, News 2021 wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 07 May 2021 19:06:54 +1000, jonz scribed:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 5/7/2021 4:06 PM, Dechucka wrote:
>>>>>>> On 6/05/2021 9:45 pm, Sylvia Else wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 06-May-21 7:18 pm, Max wrote:
>>>>>>>>> https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-05-06/jarryd-hayne-sentenced-
> for-
>>>>> sexual-assault/100120002
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Former NRL star Jarryd Hayne has been sentenced to five years and
>>>>>>>>> nine months in jail.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I think he should appeal the conviction, or the sentence at
>>>>>>>>> least.
>>>>>>>>> It was a female judge which may have introduced a bias to
>>>>>>>>> proceedings. This is the advantage of an appeals court where you
>>>>>>>>> have more than one gender on the judging panel.
>>>>>>>> The appeal could wouldn't change it unless it was deemed
>>>>>>>> manifestly excessive. Merely being on the high side (if it is)
>>>>>>>> won't be sufficient.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sylvia.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is it on the high side? Isn't the maximum sentence 14 years?
>>>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In this case I reckon its OTT. This:
>>>>>> .......................
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The trial continues.
>>>>> No mate, it is over and done with and he is in the clanger. The jury
>>>>> decided, the judge sentenced and now he is doing time.
>>>>
>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>
>>>> I neglected to erase that line!. My bad.   This time Leave the poast
>>>> alone you old fool!....
>>>
>>> roast perhaps?
>>>
>>> No mate, it is over and done with and he is in the clanger. The jury
>>> decided, the judge sentenced and now he is doing time.
>>>
>>>
>> It can be appealed, both the conviction and the sentence. Just like
>> Cardinal George Pell successfully appealed his conviction and now is
>> totally exonerated.
>
> He is not totally exonerated. The stench will always e there.
>
Hayne is a convicted criminal but this may change in the future

On Sat, 08 May 2021 06:39:16 +1000, Dechucka scribed:

> On 7/05/2021 11:28 pm, News 2021 wrote:
>> On Fri, 07 May 2021 22:41:13 +1000, Max scribed:
>>
>>> On 7/05/2021 9:24 pm, News 2021 wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 07 May 2021 20:50:59 +1000, jonz scribed:
>>>>
>>>>> On 5/7/2021 7:53 PM, News 2021 wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, 07 May 2021 19:06:54 +1000, jonz scribed:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 5/7/2021 4:06 PM, Dechucka wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 6/05/2021 9:45 pm, Sylvia Else wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 06-May-21 7:18 pm, Max wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-05-06/jarryd-hayne-sentenced-
>> for-
>>>>>> sexual-assault/100120002
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Former NRL star Jarryd Hayne has been sentenced to five years
>>>>>>>>>> and nine months in jail.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I think he should appeal the conviction, or the sentence at
>>>>>>>>>> least.
>>>>>>>>>> It was a female judge which may have introduced a bias to
>>>>>>>>>> proceedings. This is the advantage of an appeals court where
>>>>>>>>>> you have more than one gender on the judging panel.
>>>>>>>>> The appeal could wouldn't change it unless it was deemed
>>>>>>>>> manifestly excessive. Merely being on the high side (if it is)
>>>>>>>>> won't be sufficient.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Sylvia.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Is it on the high side? Isn't the maximum sentence 14 years?
>>>>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In this case I reckon its OTT. This:
>>>>>>> .......................
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The trial continues.
>>>>>> No mate, it is over and done with and he is in the clanger. The
>>>>>> jury decided, the judge sentenced and now he is doing time.
>>>>>
>>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>>
>>>>> I neglected to erase that line!. My bad.   This time Leave the poast
>>>>> alone you old fool!....
>>>>
>>>> roast perhaps?
>>>>
>>>> No mate, it is over and done with and he is in the clanger. The jury
>>>> decided, the judge sentenced and now he is doing time.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> It can be appealed, both the conviction and the sentence. Just like
>>> Cardinal George Pell successfully appealed his conviction and now is
>>> totally exonerated.
>>
>> He is not totally exonerated. The stench will always e there.
>>
> Hayne is a convicted criminal but this may change in the future

Another guy who the stench will always be attached to on two continents.

snip

>>> He is not totally exonerated. The stench will always e there.
>>>
>> Hayne is a convicted criminal but this may change in the future
>
> Another guy who the stench will always be attached to on two continents.

Luckily for Pell and many others we don't have trial by smell in Australa

On 8/05/2021 4:57 am, Rod Speed wrote:
>
>
> "Max" <max@val.morgan> wrote in message
> news:s73ch7$1ohc$1@gioia.aioe.org...
>> On 7/05/2021 9:24 pm, News 2021 wrote:
>>> On Fri, 07 May 2021 20:50:59 +1000, jonz scribed:
>>>
>>>> On 5/7/2021 7:53 PM, News 2021 wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 07 May 2021 19:06:54 +1000, jonz scribed:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 5/7/2021 4:06 PM, Dechucka wrote:
>>>>>>> On 6/05/2021 9:45 pm, Sylvia Else wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 06-May-21 7:18 pm, Max wrote:
>>>>>>>>> https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-05-06/jarryd-hayne-sentenced-for-
>>>>> sexual-assault/100120002
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Former NRL star Jarryd Hayne has been sentenced to five years and
>>>>>>>>> nine months in jail.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I think he should appeal the conviction, or the sentence at least.
>>>>>>>>> It was a female judge which may have introduced a bias to
>>>>>>>>> proceedings. This is the advantage of an appeals court where you
>>>>>>>>> have more than one gender on the judging panel.
>>>>>>>> The appeal could wouldn't change it unless it was deemed manifestly
>>>>>>>> excessive. Merely being on the high side (if it is) won't be
>>>>>>>> sufficient.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sylvia.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is it on the high side? Isn't the maximum sentence 14 years?
>>>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In this case I reckon its OTT. This:
>>>>>> .......................
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The trial continues.
>>>>> No mate, it is over and done with and he is in the clanger. The jury
>>>>> decided, the judge sentenced and now he is doing time.
>>>>
>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>
>>>> I neglected to erase that line!. My bad.   This time Leave the poast
>>>> alone you old fool!....
>>>
>>> roast perhaps?
>>>
>>> No mate, it is over and done with and he is in the clanger. The jury
>>> decided, the judge sentenced and now he is doing time.
>
>> It can be appealed, both the conviction and the sentence.  Just like
>> Cardinal George Pell successfully appealed his conviction and now is
>> totally exonerated.
>
> Nope, we know he did it. And so does he.

Are you saying he exposed his genitals while in full garb in the
sacristy where there were bound to be people coming and going? Does
that sound believable? The High Court thought it wasn't.

On 7/05/2021 11:25 am, Phil Allison wrote:
> Max the Wog Cunt wrote:
> =====================
>
>>>
>>> " I'm basically here to stir things up and create entertainment for myself."
>>>
>> What's wrong with that? It's a free and open newsgroup.
>>
>>
> ** Trolling is not allowed on ANY newsgroup.
> Trolling DESTROYS newsgrups.
>
> Your comment is the very definition of trolling.
>
> FOAD you wog idiot.
>

Luckily for this newsgroup you do not dictate how people post here. You
do not and will never have that power.

On 5/8/2021 6:39 AM, Dechucka wrote:
> On 7/05/2021 11:28 pm, News 2021 wrote:
>> On Fri, 07 May 2021 22:41:13 +1000, Max scribed:
>>
>>> On 7/05/2021 9:24 pm, News 2021 wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 07 May 2021 20:50:59 +1000, jonz scribed:
>>>>
>>>>> On 5/7/2021 7:53 PM, News 2021 wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, 07 May 2021 19:06:54 +1000, jonz scribed:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 5/7/2021 4:06 PM, Dechucka wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 6/05/2021 9:45 pm, Sylvia Else wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 06-May-21 7:18 pm, Max wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-05-06/jarryd-hayne-sentenced-
>> for-
>>>>>> sexual-assault/100120002
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Former NRL star Jarryd Hayne has been sentenced to five years
>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>> nine months in jail.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I think he should appeal the conviction, or the sentence at
>>>>>>>>>> least.
>>>>>>>>>> It was a female judge which may have introduced a bias to
>>>>>>>>>> proceedings. This is the advantage of an appeals court where you
>>>>>>>>>> have more than one gender on the judging panel.
>>>>>>>>> The appeal could wouldn't change it unless it was deemed
>>>>>>>>> manifestly excessive. Merely being on the high side (if it is)
>>>>>>>>> won't be sufficient.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Sylvia.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Is it on the high side? Isn't the maximum sentence 14 years?
>>>>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In this case I reckon its OTT. This:
>>>>>>> .......................
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The trial continues.
>>>>>> No mate, it is over and done with and he is in the clanger. The jury
>>>>>> decided, the judge sentenced and now he is doing time.
>>>>>
>>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>>
>>>>> I neglected to erase that line!. My bad.   This time Leave the poast
>>>>> alone you old fool!....
>>>>
>>>> roast perhaps?
>>>>
>>>> No mate, it is over and done with and he is in the clanger. The jury
>>>> decided, the judge sentenced and now he is doing time.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> It can be appealed, both the conviction and the sentence. Just like
>>> Cardinal George Pell successfully appealed his conviction and now is
>>> totally exonerated.
>>
>> He is not totally exonerated. The stench will always e there.
>>
> Hayne is a convicted criminal but this may change in the future

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 As it should!

"Max" <max@val.morgan> wrote in message news:s74h7v$18qe$1@gioia.aioe.org...
> On 8/05/2021 4:57 am, Rod Speed wrote:
>>
>>
>> "Max" <max@val.morgan> wrote in message
>> news:s73ch7$1ohc$1@gioia.aioe.org...
>>> On 7/05/2021 9:24 pm, News 2021 wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 07 May 2021 20:50:59 +1000, jonz scribed:
>>>>
>>>>> On 5/7/2021 7:53 PM, News 2021 wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, 07 May 2021 19:06:54 +1000, jonz scribed:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 5/7/2021 4:06 PM, Dechucka wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 6/05/2021 9:45 pm, Sylvia Else wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 06-May-21 7:18 pm, Max wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-05-06/jarryd-hayne-sentenced-for-
>>>>>> sexual-assault/100120002
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Former NRL star Jarryd Hayne has been sentenced to five years and
>>>>>>>>>> nine months in jail.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I think he should appeal the conviction, or the sentence at
>>>>>>>>>> least.
>>>>>>>>>> It was a female judge which may have introduced a bias to
>>>>>>>>>> proceedings. This is the advantage of an appeals court where you
>>>>>>>>>> have more than one gender on the judging panel.
>>>>>>>>> The appeal could wouldn't change it unless it was deemed
>>>>>>>>> manifestly
>>>>>>>>> excessive. Merely being on the high side (if it is) won't be
>>>>>>>>> sufficient.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Sylvia.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Is it on the high side? Isn't the maximum sentence 14 years?
>>>>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In this case I reckon its OTT. This:
>>>>>>> .......................
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The trial continues.
>>>>>> No mate, it is over and done with and he is in the clanger. The jury
>>>>>> decided, the judge sentenced and now he is doing time.
>>>>>
>>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>>
>>>>> I neglected to erase that line!. My bad. This time Leave the poast
>>>>> alone you old fool!....
>>>>
>>>> roast perhaps?
>>>>
>>>> No mate, it is over and done with and he is in the clanger. The jury
>>>> decided, the judge sentenced and now he is doing time.
>>
>>> It can be appealed, both the conviction and the sentence. Just like
>>> Cardinal George Pell successfully appealed his conviction and now is
>>> totally exonerated.
>>
>> Nope, we know he did it. And so does he.
>
> Are you saying he exposed his genitals while in full garb in the sacristy

Yep.

> where there were bound to be people coming and going?

Yep. We know he did that at the pool in sydney too and
was told by an adult there to behave himself or else.

> Does that sound believable? The High Court thought it wasn't.

That’s not what the High Court thought.

Max the Psycho Troll wrote:
=====================
>>
> >>> " I'm basically here to stir things up and create entertainment for myself."
> >>>
> >> What's wrong with that? It's a free and open newsgroup.
> >>
> >>
> > ** Trolling is not allowed on ANY newsgroup.
> > Trolling DESTROYS newsgrups.
> >
> > Your comment is the very definition of trolling.
> >
> > FOAD you wog idiot.
> >
> Luckily for this newsgroup you do not dictate how people post here.

** Newsgroups are self policing, unless "moderated".
The usual usenet rules need to be observed.
Anyone intent on * malicious trolling * is gonna get their arse kicked hard.

> You do not and will never have that power.

** You have *no idea* how much power one person can bring to bear.

...... Phil

On 8/05/2021 10:20 am, Rod Speed wrote:
>
>
> "Max" <max@val.morgan> wrote in message
> news:s74h7v$18qe$1@gioia.aioe.org...
>> On 8/05/2021 4:57 am, Rod Speed wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> "Max" <max@val.morgan> wrote in message
>>> news:s73ch7$1ohc$1@gioia.aioe.org...
>>>> On 7/05/2021 9:24 pm, News 2021 wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 07 May 2021 20:50:59 +1000, jonz scribed:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 5/7/2021 7:53 PM, News 2021 wrote:
>>>>>>> On Fri, 07 May 2021 19:06:54 +1000, jonz scribed:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 5/7/2021 4:06 PM, Dechucka wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 6/05/2021 9:45 pm, Sylvia Else wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 06-May-21 7:18 pm, Max wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-05-06/jarryd-hayne-sentenced-for-
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> sexual-assault/100120002
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Former NRL star Jarryd Hayne has been sentenced to five years
>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>> nine months in jail.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I think he should appeal the conviction, or the sentence at
>>>>>>>>>>> least.
>>>>>>>>>>> It was a female judge which may have introduced a bias to
>>>>>>>>>>> proceedings. This is the advantage of an appeals court where you
>>>>>>>>>>> have more than one gender on the judging panel.
>>>>>>>>>> The appeal could wouldn't change it unless it was deemed
>>>>>>>>>> manifestly
>>>>>>>>>> excessive. Merely being on the high side (if it is) won't be
>>>>>>>>>> sufficient.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Sylvia.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Is it on the high side? Isn't the maximum sentence 14 years?
>>>>>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In this case I reckon its OTT. This:
>>>>>>>> .......................
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The trial continues.
>>>>>>> No mate, it is over and done with and he is in the clanger. The jury
>>>>>>> decided, the judge sentenced and now he is doing time.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I neglected to erase that line!. My bad.   This time Leave the poast
>>>>>> alone you old fool!....
>>>>>
>>>>> roast perhaps?
>>>>>
>>>>> No mate, it is over and done with and he is in the clanger. The jury
>>>>> decided, the judge sentenced and now he is doing time.
>>>
>>>> It can be appealed, both the conviction and the sentence.  Just like
>>>> Cardinal George Pell successfully appealed his conviction and now is
>>>> totally exonerated.
>>>
>>> Nope, we know he did it. And so does he.
>>
>> Are you saying he exposed his genitals while in full garb in the sacristy
>
> Yep.
>
>> where there were bound to be people coming and going?
>
> Yep. We know he did that at the pool in sydney too and
> was told by an adult there to behave himself or else.
>

A bit different at a pool changerooms where it is expected that you
would get naked to change clothes etc.

He might have been a bit a of wierdo in those settings and maybe even
alleged low range offender, but he is not guilty of the serious offences
he was aquitted of.

>> Does that sound believable?  The High Court thought it wasn't.
>
> That’s not what the High Court thought.

The High Court talked about the impossibility and extreme unlikelyhood
of the offences taking place as described by the complainant.