Message-ID:

What a COINCIDENCE! I'm an authorized "SNOOTS OF THE STARS" dealer!!

aus+uk / uk.sport.cricket / Re: The Hundred ruins f-c cricket

Re: The Hundred ruins f-c cricket

<j8sfinFpi9bU1@mid.individual.net>

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=19790&group=uk.sport.cricket#19790

copy link Newsgroups: uk.sport.cricket

Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!news.szaf.org!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: nos...@lane-farm.fsnet.co.uk (David North)
Newsgroups: uk.sport.cricket
Subject: Re: The Hundred ruins f-c cricket
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2022 20:04:39 +0000
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <j8sfinFpi9bU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <75th2h1ut2cl2jubeojfbvj530apg55gru@4ax.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net 4zGbESj+xUc669rPQvEy9w/2g+g75a83IrXp/fl2lXr5TMNHu1
Cancel-Lock: sha1:vCqaC62fcMg1AY61Hr8MI4H0QYk=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/91.6.2
In-Reply-To: <75th2h1ut2cl2jubeojfbvj530apg55gru@4ax.com>

by: David North - Wed, 9 Mar 2022 20:04 UTC

On 09/03/2022 18:47, Mike Holmans wrote:
> At least, I presume that will be the reaction from the idiot corner to
> the news that the 100's playing condition that if a batsman is caught,
> the new batsman goes to the end where the out batsman was - ie the new
> batsman will take strike unless it was the last ball of the over, no
> matter how many runs were attempted while the ball was in the air - is
> incorporated in the latest Laws update.
>
> They've also moved the Law regarding non-strikers being run out by
> bowlers from Unfair Play to Run Out because it's a legitimate way to
> get a run out, not sharp practice.

I believe it was under Unfair Play on the basis that the "non-striker
leaving his/her ground early" (which is its heading) could be unfair if
it is deemed to be an attempt to steal a run. I don't think there was
ever any suggestion in the Laws that running him/her out is unfair.

--
David North

Re: The Hundred ruins f-c cricket

<4qfi2htr2hf9uike025n2pg51laa4ph4tl@4ax.com>

copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=19795&group=uk.sport.cricket#19795

copy link Newsgroups: uk.sport.cricket

Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!nLbY2aO4Q9E1VGAFNU/ZVg.user.46.165.242.91.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: max...@tea.time (max.it)
Newsgroups: uk.sport.cricket
Subject: Re: The Hundred ruins f-c cricket
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 00:06:48 +0000
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <4qfi2htr2hf9uike025n2pg51laa4ph4tl@4ax.com>
References: <75th2h1ut2cl2jubeojfbvj530apg55gru@4ax.com> <j8sfinFpi9bU1@mid.individual.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="60273"; posting-host="nLbY2aO4Q9E1VGAFNU/ZVg.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 220309-10, 9/3/2022), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2

by: max.it - Thu, 10 Mar 2022 00:06 UTC

On Wed, 9 Mar 2022 20:04:39 +0000, David North
<nospam@lane-farm.fsnet.co.uk> wrote:

>On 09/03/2022 18:47, Mike Holmans wrote:
>> At least, I presume that will be the reaction from the idiot corner to
>> the news that the 100's playing condition that if a batsman is caught,
>> the new batsman goes to the end where the out batsman was - ie the new
>> batsman will take strike unless it was the last ball of the over, no
>> matter how many runs were attempted while the ball was in the air - is
>> incorporated in the latest Laws update.
>>
>> They've also moved the Law regarding non-strikers being run out by
>> bowlers from Unfair Play to Run Out because it's a legitimate way to
>> get a run out, not sharp practice.
>
>I believe it was under Unfair Play on the basis that the "non-striker
>leaving his/her ground early" (which is its heading) could be unfair if
>it is deemed to be an attempt to steal a run. I don't think there was
>ever any suggestion in the Laws that running him/her out is unfair.

I noticed that Broad had said that "Dismissing a batter is about
skill & the Mankad requires zero skill".

He must mean zero skill from the non striker.

max.it

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

Subject	Author
Re: The Hundred ruins f-c cricket	David North
Re: The Hundred ruins f-c cricket	max.it