Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

After any salary raise, you will have less money at the end of the month than you did before.


aus+uk / uk.media.radio.archers / Is it right to still call it "itv3 + 1"?

SubjectAuthor
* Is it right to still call it "itv3 + 1"?J. P. Gilliver
+* Re: Is it right to still call it "itv3 + 1"?krw
|`* Re: Is it right to still call it "itv3 + 1"?J. P. Gilliver
| `* Re: Is it right to still call it "itv3 + 1"?Joe Kerr
|  `* Re: Is it right to still call it "itv3 + 1"?Wenlock
|   `- Re: Is it right to still call it "itv3 + 1"?Iain Archer
`* Re: Is it right to still call it "itv3 + 1"?Iain Archer
 +- Re: Is it right to still call it "itv3 + 1"?krw
 `- Re: Is it right to still call it "itv3 + 1"?J. P. Gilliver

1
Is it right to still call it "itv3 + 1"?

<Y2LCX3XC5QllFwmW@255soft.uk>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=20062&group=uk.media.radio.archers#20062

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.media.radio.archers
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!border-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.brightview.co.uk!news.brightview.co.uk.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2024 07:39:51 +0000
Message-ID: <Y2LCX3XC5QllFwmW@255soft.uk>
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2024 07:35:30 +0000
From: G6J...@255soft.uk (J. P. Gilliver)
Newsgroups: uk.media.radio.archers
Subject: Is it right to still call it "itv3 + 1"?
Organization: 255 software
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=us-ascii
User-Agent: Turnpike/6.07-M (<H9xiwTsJ8$6eRCJVGiA+QtHjzY>)
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 240102-10, 2024-1-2), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Lines: 19
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-XgABcibBVMNKXj/0CLzPsekLR8t+WIFPmXnU4vHgPuEhbBMi5ZsURScqNyRnR+J1io+82/Pqfyrxpbr!6SNzBwi9yRlv9NBcX2ePkDjEzgWez4NSwf+sgOOVVucsgZDKzVQxyQ6ZQU3Ch4lW6vQg6a+z
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
 by: J. P. Gilliver - Wed, 3 Jan 2024 07:35 UTC

Channel 59 on FreeView used to be a delayed version of "itv3", from 9pm
to 4 am.

But now, if I select it, I get a banner page saying

Programmes
return at 4 am

itv3 +1

but when I look at the EPG, I see that it's teleshopping from 4-6 am,
just "this is" outside that time.

Is it valid to still call it itv3+1?
--
J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf

All humanity is divided into three classes: those who are immovable, those who
are movable, and those who move! - Benjamin Franklin

Re: Is it right to still call it "itv3 + 1"?

<2L2dnQWvYpSYpgj4nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=20074&group=uk.media.radio.archers#20074

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.media.radio.archers
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.hasname.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!69.80.99.22.MISMATCH!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.brightview.co.uk!news.brightview.co.uk.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2024 10:46:29 +0000
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2024 10:46:30 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/102.0 Thunderbird/102.15.1
Subject: Re: Is it right to still call it "itv3 + 1"?
Content-Language: en-GB
Newsgroups: uk.media.radio.archers
References: <Y2LCX3XC5QllFwmW@255soft.uk>
From: krw...@whitnet.uk (krw)
In-Reply-To: <Y2LCX3XC5QllFwmW@255soft.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <2L2dnQWvYpSYpgj4nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>
Lines: 23
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-fLr0OZwaHJG0wR/iiQBlsMt7NRD4sY9V1GlJZinjY03nsvCneRmPvryUPqNIkm1vp14qn7o/sviDgfg!C/PIVOrHdAz7nIV2DmzvHhZZOESVafbnNwRYDoDwES+nhZQLJFu1ktsaWJ2VR/cCZSZQc0lg42EF!pVt7UCgm8BgoJZGuElYftVbTAL1H
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
 by: krw - Wed, 3 Jan 2024 10:46 UTC

On 3.1.24 07:35, J. P. Gilliver wrote:
> Channel 59 on FreeView used to be a delayed version of "itv3", from 9pm
> to 4 am.
>
> But now, if I select it, I get a banner page saying
>
> Programmes
> return at 4 am
>
> itv3 +1
>
> but when I look at the EPG, I see that it's teleshopping from 4-6 am,
> just "this is" outside that time.
>
> Is it valid to still call it itv3+1?

I am also told to go and look at the EPG for ITV3 - but it does not
mention 9pm to 4am only ... very strange.

--
Kosmo Richard W
www.travelswmw.whitnet.uk
https://tinyurl.com/KRWpics

Re: Is it right to still call it "itv3 + 1"?

<un3e5d$35m39$1@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=20076&group=uk.media.radio.archers#20076

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.media.radio.archers
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!newsfeed.endofthelinebbs.com!news.hispagatos.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: ian...@montaigne.me.uk (Iain Archer)
Newsgroups: uk.media.radio.archers
Subject: Re: Is it right to still call it "itv3 + 1"?
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2024 10:50:21 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <un3e5d$35m39$1@dont-email.me>
References: <Y2LCX3XC5QllFwmW@255soft.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2024 10:50:21 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="e6b83cee3cc7f6150ec9598dce9734b6";
logging-data="3332201"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18+1kjabGgSDNhA5Q9yq28L"
User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a
git.gnome.org/pan2)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:OjBfRzrkPsIwxhprHZl5vLKKQ+I=
 by: Iain Archer - Wed, 3 Jan 2024 10:50 UTC

On Wed, 03 Jan 2024 07:35:30 +0000, J. P. Gilliver wrote:

> Channel 59 on FreeView used to be a delayed version of "itv3", from 9pm
> to 4 am.
>
> But now, if I select it, I get a banner page saying
>
> Programmes return at 4 am
>
> itv3 +1
>
> but when I look at the EPG, I see that it's teleshopping from 4-6 am,
> just "this is" outside that time.
>
> Is it valid to still call it itv3+1?

"A prolific writer and conservationist, he shot to fame as a broadcasting
star when he joined the BBC radio programme ‘The Brain Trust’
in 1942."

Two links in the above may lead to a possible answer.

Re: Is it right to still call it "itv3 + 1"?

<ucacnW_cH9rD2Qj4nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=20078&group=uk.media.radio.archers#20078

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.media.radio.archers
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!border-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.brightview.co.uk!news.brightview.co.uk.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2024 11:26:22 +0000
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2024 11:26:23 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
Firefox/102.0 Thunderbird/102.15.1
Subject: Re: Is it right to still call it "itv3 + 1"?
Content-Language: en-GB
Newsgroups: uk.media.radio.archers
References: <Y2LCX3XC5QllFwmW@255soft.uk> <un3e5d$35m39$1@dont-email.me>
From: krw...@whitnet.uk (krw)
In-Reply-To: <un3e5d$35m39$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <ucacnW_cH9rD2Qj4nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>
Lines: 30
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-hpymnCueOTMZaqwObpGhMtZcGL0mhKRf/1YVUa3jQOT3wxoIfag0WWqDyUqFmt9HbF03O4UQdKu9j4c!hexMQwEQpu6QCZ7GfMv2pbppFpfd1t7ImlsSVzHVHGpuHE2kzaF3UB6JNlCblPol/fcfZKQ0zRkq!vcDymxwtgl4eOgTjzvso5k3OiPFK
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
 by: krw - Wed, 3 Jan 2024 11:26 UTC

On 3.1.24 10:50, Iain Archer wrote:
> On Wed, 03 Jan 2024 07:35:30 +0000, J. P. Gilliver wrote:
>
>> Channel 59 on FreeView used to be a delayed version of "itv3", from 9pm
>> to 4 am.
>>
>> But now, if I select it, I get a banner page saying
>>
>> Programmes return at 4 am
>>
>> itv3 +1
>>
>> but when I look at the EPG, I see that it's teleshopping from 4-6 am,
>> just "this is" outside that time.
>>
>> Is it valid to still call it itv3+1?
>
> "A prolific writer and conservationist, he shot to fame as a broadcasting
> star when he joined the BBC radio programme ‘The Brain Trust’
> in 1942."
>
> Two links in the above may lead to a possible answer.
>

Whoosh.

--
Kosmo Richard W
www.travelswmw.whitnet.uk
https://tinyurl.com/KRWpics

Re: Is it right to still call it "itv3 + 1"?

<SQqgOLcEMUllFwEl@255soft.uk>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=20079&group=uk.media.radio.archers#20079

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.media.radio.archers
Path: i2pn2.org!rocksolid2!news.neodome.net!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!border-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.brightview.co.uk!news.brightview.co.uk.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2024 11:30:03 +0000
Message-ID: <SQqgOLcEMUllFwEl@255soft.uk>
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2024 11:20:36 +0000
From: G6J...@255soft.uk (J. P. Gilliver)
Newsgroups: uk.media.radio.archers
Subject: Re: Is it right to still call it "itv3 + 1"?
References: <Y2LCX3XC5QllFwmW@255soft.uk> <un3e5d$35m39$1@dont-email.me>
Organization: 255 software
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8;format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Turnpike/6.07-M (<fM3iwX+18$6vWAJVZqB+QNC4Ju>)
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 240103-2, 2024-1-3), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Lines: 37
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-ylFiBOZQs9VJv00iIYOdJITy/RUVUl7M0Q3pBZj/V1EJ5byS+TA9KpEoq5lS7uNLA8fFmxlCeCFe43L!/WIsArTdYsS+cW/+fS3MbttHL92LvfhGVFEh6LkFagpR5FOdpNKgCW/zRrluBOERnHFGYBhP
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
 by: J. P. Gilliver - Wed, 3 Jan 2024 11:20 UTC

In message <un3e5d$35m39$1@dont-email.me> at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 10:50:21,
Iain Archer <ianews@montaigne.me.uk> writes
>On Wed, 03 Jan 2024 07:35:30 +0000, J. P. Gilliver wrote:
>
>> Channel 59 on FreeView used to be a delayed version of "itv3", from 9pm
>> to 4 am.
>>
>> But now, if I select it, I get a banner page saying
>>
>> Programmes return at 4 am
>>
>> itv3 +1
>>
>> but when I look at the EPG, I see that it's teleshopping from 4-6 am,
>> just "this is" outside that time.
>>
>> Is it valid to still call it itv3+1?
>
>"A prolific writer and conservationist, he shot to fame as a broadcasting
>star when he joined the BBC radio programme ‘The Brain Trust’
>in 1942."
>
>Two links in the above may lead to a possible answer.
>
Did that followup get attached to the wrong post?

(I repeat, apologies for starting this in the wrong 'group. I would
cross it to the right one, but I know somerats want to keep UMRA
secret.)
--
J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf

"Come on, Pooh," and he walked off.
"Where are we going?" said Pooh.
"Nowhere," said Christopher Robin.
So they began going there.
~A.A.Milne

Re: Is it right to still call it "itv3 + 1"?

<thR$ytbrKUllFwBv@255soft.uk>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=20080&group=uk.media.radio.archers#20080

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.media.radio.archers
Path: i2pn2.org!rocksolid2!news.neodome.net!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!69.80.99.27.MISMATCH!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.brightview.co.uk!news.brightview.co.uk.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2024 11:30:02 +0000
Message-ID: <thR$ytbrKUllFwBv@255soft.uk>
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2024 11:19:07 +0000
From: G6J...@255soft.uk (J. P. Gilliver)
Newsgroups: uk.media.radio.archers
Subject: Re: Is it right to still call it "itv3 + 1"?
References: <Y2LCX3XC5QllFwmW@255soft.uk> <2L2dnQWvYpSYpgj4nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>
Organization: 255 software
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=us-ascii;format=flowed
User-Agent: Turnpike/6.07-M (<XE4iw3Kd8$qs0CJVByL+QtiEW8>)
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 240103-2, 2024-1-3), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Lines: 37
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-DIM1c4998KBTeR/WYSgFpL3Vdf8/VvSRGAOjLknd+0LI3QCaUjEFDOgTRLvgDfbl+2qUlvFzPYy0gtP!cvlEjc/uIjOQh81ru7RdYG1f0O9VUnAQNvwNDRoMFY+T2G2KX4wbyRVOXomhD0ZcOjiFaee8
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
 by: J. P. Gilliver - Wed, 3 Jan 2024 11:19 UTC

Apologies - wrong newsgroup; I meant this for uk.tech.broadcast. I've
still followed-up below though (-:

In message <2L2dnQWvYpSYpgj4nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@brightview.co.uk> at Wed, 3
Jan 2024 10:46:30, krw <krw@whitnet.uk> writes
>On 3.1.24 07:35, J. P. Gilliver wrote:
>> Channel 59 on FreeView used to be a delayed version of "itv3", from 9pm
>> to 4 am.
>> But now, if I select it, I get a banner page saying
>> Programmes
>> return at 4 am
>> itv3 +1
>> but when I look at the EPG, I see that it's teleshopping from 4-6
>>am,
>> just "this is" outside that time.
>> Is it valid to still call it itv3+1?
>
>I am also told to go and look at the EPG for ITV3 - but it does not
>mention 9pm to 4am only ... very strange.
>
No, the 9pm to 4 am is what it _used_ to be (not sure when it changed) -
I got that information from the Radio Times (which now does not show
FreeView 59 among ITV3's +1 channels at all, only Sky/FreeSat/Virgin).

If you look at the EPG (for Channel 59), it shows a programme called
"This is ITV3 +1" for the times it is not broadcasting, which is the
sort of thing all such channels show: this is the very boring programme
consisting of just the above info card. (Very low bandwidth too - if you
switch to them, it takes tens of seconds for the card to appear.)
--
J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf

"Come on, Pooh," and he walked off.
"Where are we going?" said Pooh.
"Nowhere," said Christopher Robin.
So they began going there.
~A.A.Milne

Re: Is it right to still call it "itv3 + 1"?

<un3hv9$36jrg$1@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=20082&group=uk.media.radio.archers#20082

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.media.radio.archers
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: joe_k...@cheerful.com (Joe Kerr)
Newsgroups: uk.media.radio.archers
Subject: Re: Is it right to still call it "itv3 + 1"?
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2024 11:55:20 +0000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 41
Message-ID: <un3hv9$36jrg$1@dont-email.me>
References: <Y2LCX3XC5QllFwmW@255soft.uk>
<2L2dnQWvYpSYpgj4nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>
<thR$ytbrKUllFwBv@255soft.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2024 11:55:21 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ea4282a4bf25d1609c8fa9df12e68d6d";
logging-data="3362672"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+Q6BW8sdfCcKGfjEySC55a"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/91.10.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:JxdlKn0mdMdXfVbrfhB8tQJwozk=
In-Reply-To: <thR$ytbrKUllFwBv@255soft.uk>
Content-Language: en-GB
 by: Joe Kerr - Wed, 3 Jan 2024 11:55 UTC

On 03/01/2024 11:19, J. P. Gilliver wrote:
> Apologies - wrong newsgroup; I meant this for uk.tech.broadcast. I've
> still followed-up below though (-:
>
> In message <2L2dnQWvYpSYpgj4nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@brightview.co.uk> at Wed, 3
> Jan 2024 10:46:30, krw <krw@whitnet.uk> writes
>> On 3.1.24 07:35, J. P. Gilliver wrote:
>>> Channel 59 on FreeView used to be a delayed version of "itv3", from 9pm
>>> to 4 am.
>>>  But now, if I select it, I get a banner page saying
>>>           Programmes
>>>          return at 4 am
>>>           itv3 +1
>>>  but when I look at the EPG, I see that it's teleshopping from 4-6 am,
>>> just "this is" outside that time.
>>>  Is it valid to still call it itv3+1?
>>
>> I am also told to go and look at the EPG for ITV3 - but it does not
>> mention 9pm to 4am only ... very strange.
>>
> No, the 9pm to 4 am is what it _used_ to be (not sure when it changed) -
> I got that information from the Radio Times (which now does not show
> FreeView 59 among ITV3's +1 channels at all, only Sky/FreeSat/Virgin).
>
> If you look at the EPG (for Channel 59), it shows a programme called
> "This is ITV3 +1" for the times it is not broadcasting, which is the
> sort of thing all such channels show: this is the very boring programme
> consisting of just the above info card. (Very low bandwidth too - if you
> switch to them, it takes tens of seconds for the card to appear.)

The Freeview listing web page calls it IV3 +1. It shows Teleshopping
from 04:00 to 06:00 and This is ITV3 +1 for the rest of the day, the
description for which is "Programmes start at 4am. For the full ITV3
schedule, please go to ITV3 on Freeview channel 10."

To answer your question I think it is still called ITV3 +1 but that is
not what it is broadcasting. It is possibly in a transitional state. Did
somebody at ITV forget to pay a bill over the holiday?

--
Ric

Re: Is it right to still call it "itv3 + 1"?

<un4av8$3a4vn$1@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=20096&group=uk.media.radio.archers#20096

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.media.radio.archers
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: wenlock....@googlemail.com (Wenlock)
Newsgroups: uk.media.radio.archers
Subject: Re: Is it right to still call it "itv3 + 1"?
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2024 19:02:00 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <un4av8$3a4vn$1@dont-email.me>
References: <Y2LCX3XC5QllFwmW@255soft.uk>
<2L2dnQWvYpSYpgj4nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>
<thR$ytbrKUllFwBv@255soft.uk>
<un3hv9$36jrg$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2024 19:02:00 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="78d7c63b4ed780d2cd8599921d5fdc65";
logging-data="3478519"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+MUi8F8G10s4vMdfk90at7"
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:T/20I86WrYV43piD8NDudzu8b5o=
sha1:SvTqza7ifh9nx7XAq7hSBDu4hd8=
 by: Wenlock - Wed, 3 Jan 2024 19:02 UTC

Joe Kerr <joe_kerr@cheerful.com> wrote:

> To answer your question I think it is still called ITV3 +1 but that is
> not what it is broadcasting. It is possibly in a transitional state. Did
> somebody at ITV forget to pay a bill over the holiday?

With ITVX now making pretty much all ITV content available at any time, I
suspect that the economic benefits of broadcasting a minor channel twice
have evaporated, and subletting it to a teleshopping outfit for two hours a
day is more profitable until a new channel wants the slot.

Re: Is it right to still call it "itv3 + 1"?

<un4n16$39ls4$2@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=20100&group=uk.media.radio.archers#20100

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.media.radio.archers
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: ian...@montaigne.me.uk (Iain Archer)
Newsgroups: uk.media.radio.archers
Subject: Re: Is it right to still call it "itv3 + 1"?
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2024 22:27:50 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <un4n16$39ls4$2@dont-email.me>
References: <Y2LCX3XC5QllFwmW@255soft.uk>
<2L2dnQWvYpSYpgj4nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>
<thR$ytbrKUllFwBv@255soft.uk> <un3hv9$36jrg$1@dont-email.me>
<un4av8$3a4vn$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2024 22:27:50 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="e6b83cee3cc7f6150ec9598dce9734b6";
logging-data="3463044"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18sLZQTCRtar0lDXReRUTAc"
User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a
git.gnome.org/pan2)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:eGg02dDq9u8hk6RXn4q+7Ngzw/8=
 by: Iain Archer - Wed, 3 Jan 2024 22:27 UTC

On Wed, 03 Jan 2024 19:02:00 +0000, Wenlock wrote:

> Joe Kerr <joe_kerr@cheerful.com> wrote:
>
>> To answer your question I think it is still called ITV3 +1 but that is
>> not what it is broadcasting. It is possibly in a transitional state.
>> Did somebody at ITV forget to pay a bill over the holiday?
>
> With ITVX now making pretty much all ITV content available at any time,
> I suspect that the economic benefits of broadcasting a minor channel
> twice have evaporated, and subletting it to a teleshopping outfit for
> two hours a day is more profitable until a new channel wants the slot.

I see there's a recent licensing change reported at
<https://www.ofcom.org.uk/manage-your-licence/tv-broadcast-licences/updates>
though I've no idea if or how it relates.


aus+uk / uk.media.radio.archers / Is it right to still call it "itv3 + 1"?

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.81
clearnet tor