Surrey made 671-9 without a century, pope making 96. I thought the
record score without a ton was 581 by notts, so is this the new
record? Also in this match was Gilchrist who i read online had
previously broken the record for most consecutive ducks = 7.

mike

On Fri, 13 May 2022 15:16:14 -0700 (PDT), mike <dmike204@yahoo.co.uk>
wrote:

>Surrey made 671-9 without a century, pope making 96. I thought the
>record score without a ton was 581 by notts, so is this the new
>record? Also in this match was Gilchrist who i read online had
>previously broken the record for most consecutive ducks = 7.
>
>mike

There have been a few 90 somethings, I only do a briefly on the
scorecards but batsmen getting 90 something seemed to stand out.

max.it

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On 13/05/2022 23:16, mike wrote:

> Surrey made 671-9 without a century, pope making 96. I thought the
> record score without a ton was 581 by notts, so is this the new
> record? Also in this match was Gilchrist who i read online had
> previously broken the record for most consecutive ducks = 7.

Notts 581 was surpassed by Surrey in 2005 - 603 (HS 89) v. Gloucs

<https://stats.acscricket.com/Records/First_Class/Overall/Team/Large_Totals_Without_Century.html>

Six sonsecutive f/c ducks had been achieved about a dozen times.

<https://stats.acscricket.com/Records/First_Class/Overall/Batting/Most_Ducks_in_Consecutive_Innings.html>

Gilchrist is shown as the last one to reach 6, which was against
Yorkshire last month.

In message <je92t1FmqtbU1@mid.individual.net>, Brian Lawrence
<Brian_W_Lawrence@msn.com> writes
>On 13/05/2022 23:16, mike wrote:
>
>> Surrey made 671-9 without a century, pope making 96. I thought the
>> record score without a ton was 581 by notts, so is this the new
>> record? Also in this match was Gilchrist who i read online had
>> previously broken the record for most consecutive ducks = 7.
>
>Notts 581 was surpassed by Surrey in 2005 - 603 (HS 89) v. Gloucs
>
><https://stats.acscricket.com/Records/First_Class/Overall/Team/Large_Tot
>als_Without_Century.html>

But apparently the overall f-c record was previously 609 by Namibia
against Uganda - which I'm a little surprised is rated as a f-c fixture.

Surrey apparently also equalled the record for most fifties in an
innings without a century. Had they delayed their declaration slightly
they might well have set a new record, as their number 11 - Worrall -
was 44*.

>
>Six sonsecutive f/c ducks had been achieved about a dozen times.
>
><https://stats.acscricket.com/Records/First_Class/Overall/Batting/Most_D
>ucks_in_Consecutive_Innings.html>
>
>Gilchrist is shown as the last one to reach 6, which was against
>Yorkshire last month.
>

On this pitch, even he might struggle to keep the sequence going.
--
John Hall
"Home is heaven and orgies are vile,
But you *need* an orgy, once in a while."
Ogden Nash (1902-1971)

On 14/05/2022 08:09, Brian Lawrence wrote:
> On 13/05/2022 23:16, mike wrote:
>
>> Surrey made 671-9 without a century,  pope making 96. I thought the
>> record score without a ton was 581 by notts, so is this the new
>> record? Also in this match was Gilchrist who i read online had
>> previously broken the record for most consecutive ducks = 7.
>
> Notts 581 was surpassed by Surrey in 2005 - 603 (HS 89) v. Gloucs
>
>
> <https://stats.acscricket.com/Records/First_Class/Overall/Team/Large_Totals_Without_Century.html>

671 is a large increase on both that county record (adding 68) and the
FC record (adding 62). There are 12 other totals within 62 of the old FC
record. If they hadn't declared, they might well have pushed the record
to over 700 - the last pair (Clark and Worrall) had already added 84.

--
David North

On 14/05/2022 10:14, John Hall wrote:
> In message <je92t1FmqtbU1@mid.individual.net>, Brian Lawrence
> <Brian_W_Lawrence@msn.com> writes
>> On 13/05/2022 23:16, mike wrote:
>>
>>> Surrey made 671-9 without a century,  pope making 96. I thought the
>>> record score without a ton was 581 by notts, so is this the new
>>> record? Also in this match was Gilchrist who i read online had
>>> previously broken the record for most consecutive ducks = 7.
>>
>> Notts 581 was surpassed by Surrey in 2005 - 603 (HS 89) v. Gloucs
>>
>> <https://stats.acscricket.com/Records/First_Class/Overall/Team/Large_Tot
>> als_Without_Century.html>
>
> But apparently the overall f-c record was previously 609 by Namibia
> against Uganda - which I'm a little surprised is rated as a f-c fixture.
>
> Surrey apparently also equalled the record for most fifties in an
> innings without a century. Had they delayed their declaration slightly
> they might well have set a new record, as their number 11 - Worrall -
> was 44*.
>
>>
>> Six sonsecutive f/c ducks had been achieved about a dozen times.
>>
>> <https://stats.acscricket.com/Records/First_Class/Overall/Batting/Most_D
>> ucks_in_Consecutive_Innings.html>
>>
>> Gilchrist is shown as the last one to reach 6, which was against
>> Yorkshire last month.
>>
>
> On this pitch, even he might struggle to keep the sequence going.

That would be an achievement in a match in which no-one has yet got out
in single figures.

Wright and Fernando were the only two previously whose 6 ducks consisted
of 3 pairs. Wright did it in his first 3 FC matches.

--
David North

On Sat, 14 May 2022 10:36:10 +0100, David North
<nospam@lane-farm.fsnet.co.uk> wrote:

>671 is a large increase on both that county record (adding 68) and the
>FC record (adding 62). There are 12 other totals within 62 of the old FC
>record.

Forgive me, but what is interesting about the number of totals "within
62" of the old record? It seems a rather idiosyncratic range.

Cheers,

Mike

On 14/05/2022 13:54, Mike Holmans wrote:
> On Sat, 14 May 2022 10:36:10 +0100, David North
> <nospam@lane-farm.fsnet.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> 671 is a large increase on both that county record (adding 68) and the
>> FC record (adding 62). There are 12 other totals within 62 of the old FC
>> record.
>
> Forgive me, but what is interesting about the number of totals "within
> 62" of the old record? It seems a rather idiosyncratic range.

That's the difference between the old record and the new - it was meant
as an indicator of how much of an outlier the new record is.

--
David North

On Sat, 14 May 2022 16:39:54 +0100, David North
<nospam@lane-farm.fsnet.co.uk> wrote:

>On 14/05/2022 13:54, Mike Holmans wrote:
>> On Sat, 14 May 2022 10:36:10 +0100, David North
>> <nospam@lane-farm.fsnet.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> 671 is a large increase on both that county record (adding 68) and the
>>> FC record (adding 62). There are 12 other totals within 62 of the old FC
>>> record.
>>
>> Forgive me, but what is interesting about the number of totals "within
>> 62" of the old record? It seems a rather idiosyncratic range.
>
>That's the difference between the old record and the new - it was meant
>as an indicator of how much of an outlier the new record is.

Fair enough.

Cheers,

Mike

In message <i1SQYZBOM3fiFw9i@jhall_nospamxx.co.uk>, John Hall
<john_nospam@jhall.co.uk> writes
>In message <je92t1FmqtbU1@mid.individual.net>, Brian Lawrence
><Brian_W_Lawrence@msn.com> writes
>>On 13/05/2022 23:16, mike wrote:
>>
>>Six sonsecutive f/c ducks had been achieved about a dozen times.
>>
>><https://stats.acscricket.com/Records/First_Class/Overall/Batting/Most_D
>>ucks_in_Consecutive_Innings.html>
>>
>>Gilchrist is shown as the last one to reach 6, which was against
>>Yorkshire last month.
>>
>
>On this pitch, even he might struggle to keep the sequence going.

In the event, he was out for 5.
--
John Hall
"Home is heaven and orgies are vile,
But you *need* an orgy, once in a while."
Ogden Nash (1902-1971)

On Friday, May 13, 2022 at 11:16:15 PM UTC+1, mike wrote:
> Surrey made 671-9 without a century, pope making 96. I thought the
> record score without a ton was 581 by notts, so is this the new
> record? Also in this match was Gilchrist who i read online had
> previously broken the record for most consecutive ducks = 7.
>
> mike

Andrew Samson claims it is new record so there is goo chance it is... RH