On 28/11/2022 6:38 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> On 25/11/2022 3:38 pm, Xeno wrote:
>> On 25/11/2022 1:27 pm, alvey wrote:
>>> Grumpy Tech <grumpytech07@gmail.com> wrote in
>>> news:tlp4bk$1mh3$1@gioia.aioe.org:
>>>
>>>> On 25/11/2022 8:36 am, yosemite sam wrote:
>>>>> Xeno wrote:
>>>>>> On 24/11/2022 10:06 pm, yosemite sam wrote:
>>>>>>> Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 23/11/2022 9:56 pm, yosemite sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 22/11/2022 5:50 pm, yosemite sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 22/11/2022 10:33 am, yosemite sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> who gets their ass kicked the most every time they post?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> keefy or gwumpy? it's a close call now..  :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry neither of us can post anything that will match the
>>>>>>>>>>>> stupidity of your posts.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. Monster Cables
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> what about them?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> They are a waste of money and no better than an ordinary in spec
>>>>>>>>>> cable, just a hell of a lot dearer.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> and what would you know. how much experience have you had with AV
>>>>>>>>> cables?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. Airplane with a wing torn off landing
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> it's possible
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Not likely
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> it has happened. so possible, as I said.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 3. Truck off the side of a road which is clearly cgi from a
>>>>>>>>>>>> game
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> very low res. hard to tell
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Bullshit.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> it was low res
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 4. Buying an MG...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> so? a very popular car these days
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> But you bought it without assessing if it would meet your needs
>>>>>>>>>> and it didn't.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> wrong! if you keep making stuff up you will fall flat on yer face
>>>>>>>>> every time, as u have done so often. fyi I actually brought my
>>>>>>>>> ride on buggy and clubs to the dealer and put them into one of
>>>>>>>>> the demos to make sure they would fit. the only thing it couldn't
>>>>>>>>> do was tow my 6x4 trailer, but the dealer told me it could.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So you had to sell it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> wrong. (again!) I didn't *have* to sell it. I sold it because i
>>>>>>>>> didn't like driving it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Dumb.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> yes u are
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry you win by the proverbial country mile.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> nah. you still hold the crown..
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I highly doubt it. I've only mentioned the tip of the iceberg.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> OMG there's more! I'm trembling uncontrollably..
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You have nothing to worry about. It takes a special kind of stupid
>>>>>>>> to be a Noddy enabler.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> yes. and after all, an iceberg sank the titanic, and gwumpy is
>>>>>>> hardly 'titanic', more like a tinny...  :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Well, in that pic of him on the motorcycle, he certainly looked to
>>>>>> be of *Titanic proportions*. Can you imagine it floundering around
>>>>>> in the North Atlantic??
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> whales might try to have sex thinking it was another whale. (a
>>>>> strange looking one)..  :)
>>>>>
>>>> Where's the halfwit sheriff to tell you to behave yourself. Oh that's
>>>> right, he's joined in. You're all a bunch of idiots. What a joke the
>>>> flc has become. xeno for a supposedly educated person you are a
>>>> complete dickhead. Clocky, you must be especially stupid as you enable
>>>> this bunch of idiots. Felix yap yap.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I disagree with attacking people's appearance Gumps, but I'll point out
>>> that it's a logical progression from giving, "Because you deserved it."
>>> as the sole reason for condoning cretinous abuse.
>>>
>> He rendered himself fair game when he condoned Darren's abuse of
>> myself and my wife. He could have said something, anything, but the
>> silence was tacit complicity.
>
> Like your silence when the troll posted my name?
>
Like your silence when the FLCJC, of which you now seem to be a part,
posted my name?

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On 28/11/2022 4:00 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> On 25/11/2022 5:43 pm, alvey wrote:
>> yosemite sam <felix@goaway.com> wrote in
>> news:juaob1F25liU1@mid.individual.net:
>>
>>> alvey wrote:
>
>>>> I disagree with attacking people's appearance Gumps,
>>>
>>> but not posting real names. ???
>>
>> Depends. This issue, like many things in Life, isn't black or white.
>> Overwhelmingly I don't do it, but if someone baselessly and witlessly
>> flames/abuses me then 'No', I don't have any problem whatsoever in
>> revealing. Just encouraging good behaviour y'see...
>
> So I've been baselessly and witlessly flaming and abusing you?
>
> What a fragile little princess you must be, quite at odds with your
> postings here that mainly consist of flames and abuse. That would seem
> to make you a 100% pure, government inspected, export quality, lifetime
> guaranteed hypocrite.

You just described yourself keith.

--
keith on the 7 Oct 2021 wrote;
"He asserts that the claim is true, so, if
it is unproven, he is lying."

On 28/11/2022 3:38 pm, keithr0 wrote:
> On 25/11/2022 3:38 pm, Xeno wrote:
>> On 25/11/2022 1:27 pm, alvey wrote:
>>> Grumpy Tech <grumpytech07@gmail.com> wrote in
>>> news:tlp4bk$1mh3$1@gioia.aioe.org:
>>>
>>>> On 25/11/2022 8:36 am, yosemite sam wrote:
>>>>> Xeno wrote:
>>>>>> On 24/11/2022 10:06 pm, yosemite sam wrote:
>>>>>>> Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 23/11/2022 9:56 pm, yosemite sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 22/11/2022 5:50 pm, yosemite sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 22/11/2022 10:33 am, yosemite sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> who gets their ass kicked the most every time they post?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> keefy or gwumpy? it's a close call now..  :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry neither of us can post anything that will match the
>>>>>>>>>>>> stupidity of your posts.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. Monster Cables
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> what about them?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> They are a waste of money and no better than an ordinary in spec
>>>>>>>>>> cable, just a hell of a lot dearer.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> and what would you know. how much experience have you had with AV
>>>>>>>>> cables?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. Airplane with a wing torn off landing
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> it's possible
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Not likely
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> it has happened. so possible, as I said.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 3. Truck off the side of a road which is clearly cgi from a
>>>>>>>>>>>> game
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> very low res. hard to tell
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Bullshit.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> it was low res
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 4. Buying an MG...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> so? a very popular car these days
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> But you bought it without assessing if it would meet your needs
>>>>>>>>>> and it didn't.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> wrong! if you keep making stuff up you will fall flat on yer face
>>>>>>>>> every time, as u have done so often. fyi I actually brought my
>>>>>>>>> ride on buggy and clubs to the dealer and put them into one of
>>>>>>>>> the demos to make sure they would fit. the only thing it couldn't
>>>>>>>>> do was tow my 6x4 trailer, but the dealer told me it could.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So you had to sell it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> wrong. (again!) I didn't *have* to sell it. I sold it because i
>>>>>>>>> didn't like driving it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Dumb.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> yes u are
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry you win by the proverbial country mile.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> nah. you still hold the crown..
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I highly doubt it. I've only mentioned the tip of the iceberg.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> OMG there's more! I'm trembling uncontrollably..
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You have nothing to worry about. It takes a special kind of stupid
>>>>>>>> to be a Noddy enabler.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> yes. and after all, an iceberg sank the titanic, and gwumpy is
>>>>>>> hardly 'titanic', more like a tinny...  :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Well, in that pic of him on the motorcycle, he certainly looked to
>>>>>> be of *Titanic proportions*. Can you imagine it floundering around
>>>>>> in the North Atlantic??
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> whales might try to have sex thinking it was another whale. (a
>>>>> strange looking one)..  :)
>>>>>
>>>> Where's the halfwit sheriff to tell you to behave yourself. Oh that's
>>>> right, he's joined in. You're all a bunch of idiots. What a joke the
>>>> flc has become. xeno for a supposedly educated person you are a
>>>> complete dickhead. Clocky, you must be especially stupid as you enable
>>>> this bunch of idiots. Felix yap yap.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I disagree with attacking people's appearance Gumps, but I'll point out
>>> that it's a logical progression from giving, "Because you deserved it."
>>> as the sole reason for condoning cretinous abuse.
>>>
>> He rendered himself fair game when he condoned Darren's abuse of
>> myself and my wife. He could have said something, anything, but the
>> silence was tacit complicity.
>
> Like your silence when the troll posted my name?
>

What about your complicity in silence to Grumpy's appalling behaviour in
here? He's a repeat offender but not a squeak in protest from you...

--
keith on the 7 Oct 2021 wrote;
"He asserts that the claim is true, so, if
it is unproven, he is lying."

On 29/11/2022 1:40 am, Clocky wrote:
> On 28/11/2022 3:38 pm, keithr0 wrote:

>> Like your silence when the troll posted my name?
>>
>
> What about your complicity in silence to Grumpy's appalling behaviour in
> here? He's a repeat offender but not a squeak in protest from you...
>
>
Really Clocky. You need to go and watch Frozen a few times. You don't
like what happened because you and your friends prefer to be anonymous
trolls however you pushed so I responded in kind.

In typical fashion though you will state you did nothing wrong yet the
evidence shows that you continue to push. Like when you lied about me
exposing your address and suddenly changed it to your suburb. Poor
little clocky. He was found to be a liar.

On 11/29/2022 12:49 PM, Grumpy Tech wrote:
> On 29/11/2022 1:40 am, Clocky wrote:
>> On 28/11/2022 3:38 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>
>>> Like your silence when the troll posted my name?
>>>
>>
>> What about your complicity in silence to Grumpy's appalling behaviour
>> in here? He's a repeat offender but not a squeak in protest from you...
>>
>>
> Really Clocky. You need to go and watch Frozen a few times. You don't
> like what happened because you and your friends prefer to be anonymous
> trolls however you pushed so I responded in kind.
>
> In typical fashion though you will state you did nothing wrong yet the
> evidence shows that you continue to push. Like when you lied about me
> exposing your address and suddenly changed it to your suburb. Poor
> little clocky. He was found to be a liar.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Definitely paranoid!. (There`s a lot of that in here.)

Grumpy Tech wrote:
> On 29/11/2022 1:40 am, Clocky wrote:
>> On 28/11/2022 3:38 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>
>>> Like your silence when the troll posted my name?
>>>
>>
>> What about your complicity in silence to Grumpy's appalling behaviour
>> in here? He's a repeat offender but not a squeak in protest from you...
>>
>>
> Really Clocky. You need to go and watch Frozen a few times. You don't
> like what happened because you and your friends prefer to be anonymous

Oh, and "Grumpy Tech" is not anonymous? you're even so paranoid you
blocked out your reflection in your cars bonnet in a pic you posted, and
even went whining to my ISP cos I posted a pic of you that was publicly
posted anyway.

<snip grumpy whining>

--
https://tinyurl.com/Yosemite-Sam

FUCK PUTIN!!

On 29/11/2022 9:49 am, Grumpy Tech wrote:
> On 29/11/2022 1:40 am, Clocky wrote:
>> On 28/11/2022 3:38 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>
>>> Like your silence when the troll posted my name?
>>>
>>
>> What about your complicity in silence to Grumpy's appalling behaviour
>> in here? He's a repeat offender but not a squeak in protest from you...
>>
>>
> Really Clocky.

That's what all the evidence clearly shows, so yes, *really*.
You're a repeat offender and a defamer. Fact.

--
keith on the 7 Oct 2021 wrote;
"He asserts that the claim is true, so, if
it is unproven, he is lying."

On 29/11/2022 11:12 am, yosemite sam wrote:
> Grumpy Tech wrote:
>> On 29/11/2022 1:40 am, Clocky wrote:
>>> On 28/11/2022 3:38 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>
>>>> Like your silence when the troll posted my name?
>>>>
>>>
>>> What about your complicity in silence to Grumpy's appalling behaviour
>>> in here? He's a repeat offender but not a squeak in protest from you...
>>>
>>>
>> Really Clocky. You need to go and watch Frozen a few times. You don't
>> like what happened because you and your friends prefer to be anonymous
>
> Oh, and "Grumpy Tech" is not anonymous? you're even so paranoid you
> blocked out your reflection in your cars bonnet in a pic you posted, and
> even went whining to my ISP cos I posted a pic of you that was publicly
> posted anyway.
>
> <snip grumpy whining>
>

He's not anonymous, not in the slightest bit. He knows I value my word
and integrity more than he does his which is why I haven't posted *any*
of his details despite his continued provocation and harassment.

The evidence is absolutely clear and the more he posts his false
accusations and defamatory comments the stronger my case.

--
keith on the 7 Oct 2021 wrote;
"He asserts that the claim is true, so, if
it is unproven, he is lying."

On 29/11/2022 1:30 am, Clocky wrote:
> On 28/11/2022 4:00 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 25/11/2022 5:43 pm, alvey wrote:
>>> yosemite sam <felix@goaway.com> wrote in
>>> news:juaob1F25liU1@mid.individual.net:
>>>
>>>> alvey wrote:
>>
>>>>> I disagree with attacking people's appearance Gumps,
>>>>
>>>> but not posting real names. ???
>>>
>>> Depends. This issue, like many things in Life, isn't black or white.
>>> Overwhelmingly I don't do it, but if someone baselessly and witlessly
>>> flames/abuses me then 'No', I don't have any problem whatsoever in
>>> revealing. Just encouraging good behaviour y'see...
>>
>> So I've been baselessly and witlessly flaming and abusing you?
>>
>> What a fragile little princess you must be, quite at odds with your
>> postings here that mainly consist of flames and abuse. That would seem
>> to make you a 100% pure, government inspected, export quality,
>> lifetime guaranteed hypocrite.
>
> You just described yourself keith.
>
>
It must have taken a major intellectual effort for you to have come up
with such a devastating reply.

On 29/11/2022 1:40 am, Clocky wrote:
> On 28/11/2022 3:38 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 25/11/2022 3:38 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>> On 25/11/2022 1:27 pm, alvey wrote:
>>>> Grumpy Tech <grumpytech07@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>> news:tlp4bk$1mh3$1@gioia.aioe.org:
>>>>
>>>>> On 25/11/2022 8:36 am, yosemite sam wrote:
>>>>>> Xeno wrote:
>>>>>>> On 24/11/2022 10:06 pm, yosemite sam wrote:
>>>>>>>> Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 23/11/2022 9:56 pm, yosemite sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 22/11/2022 5:50 pm, yosemite sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 22/11/2022 10:33 am, yosemite sam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> who gets their ass kicked the most every time they post?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> keefy or gwumpy? it's a close call now..  :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry neither of us can post anything that will match the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> stupidity of your posts.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. Monster Cables
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> what about them?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> They are a waste of money and no better than an ordinary in spec
>>>>>>>>>>> cable, just a hell of a lot dearer.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> and what would you know. how much experience have you had with AV
>>>>>>>>>> cables?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. Airplane with a wing torn off landing
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> it's possible
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Not likely
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> it has happened. so possible, as I said.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3. Truck off the side of a road which is clearly cgi from a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> game
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> very low res. hard to tell
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Bullshit.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> it was low res
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4. Buying an MG...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> so? a very popular car these days
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> But you bought it without assessing if it would meet your needs
>>>>>>>>>>> and it didn't.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> wrong! if you keep making stuff up you will fall flat on yer face
>>>>>>>>>> every time, as u have done so often. fyi I actually brought my
>>>>>>>>>> ride on buggy and clubs to the dealer and put them into one of
>>>>>>>>>> the demos to make sure they would fit. the only thing it couldn't
>>>>>>>>>> do was tow my 6x4 trailer, but the dealer told me it could.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> So you had to sell it.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> wrong. (again!) I didn't *have* to sell it. I sold it because i
>>>>>>>>>> didn't like driving it.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Dumb.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> yes u are
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry you win by the proverbial country mile.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> nah. you still hold the crown..
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I highly doubt it. I've only mentioned the tip of the iceberg.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> OMG there's more! I'm trembling uncontrollably..
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You have nothing to worry about. It takes a special kind of stupid
>>>>>>>>> to be a Noddy enabler.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> yes. and after all, an iceberg sank the titanic, and gwumpy is
>>>>>>>> hardly 'titanic', more like a tinny...  :)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Well, in that pic of him on the motorcycle, he certainly looked to
>>>>>>> be of *Titanic proportions*. Can you imagine it floundering around
>>>>>>> in the North Atlantic??
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> whales might try to have sex thinking it was another whale. (a
>>>>>> strange looking one)..  :)
>>>>>>
>>>>> Where's the halfwit sheriff to tell you to behave yourself. Oh that's
>>>>> right, he's joined in. You're all a bunch of idiots. What a joke the
>>>>> flc has become. xeno for a supposedly educated person you are a
>>>>> complete dickhead. Clocky, you must be especially stupid as you enable
>>>>> this bunch of idiots. Felix yap yap.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I disagree with attacking people's appearance Gumps, but I'll point out
>>>> that it's a logical progression from giving, "Because you deserved it."
>>>> as the sole reason for condoning cretinous abuse.
>>>>
>>> He rendered himself fair game when he condoned Darren's abuse of
>>> myself and my wife. He could have said something, anything, but the
>>> silence was tacit complicity.
>>
>> Like your silence when the troll posted my name?
>>
>
> What about your complicity in silence to Grumpy's appalling behaviour in
> here? He's a repeat offender but not a squeak in protest from you...
>
>
Like what?

On 29/11/2022 1:27 pm, Clocky wrote:
> On 29/11/2022 9:49 am, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>> On 29/11/2022 1:40 am, Clocky wrote:
>>> On 28/11/2022 3:38 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>
>>>> Like your silence when the troll posted my name?
>>>>
>>>
>>> What about your complicity in silence to Grumpy's appalling behaviour
>>> in here? He's a repeat offender but not a squeak in protest from you...
>>>
>>>
>> Really Clocky.
>
> That's what all the evidence clearly shows, so yes, *really*.
> You're a repeat offender and a defamer. Fact.

In your no so humble opinion. Face it clocky. You have defamed me by
stating multiple things that I did not do. You lied. It's a fact no
matter what spin you try to put on it. Get the hell over yourself. As I
stated, you want to be anonymous so you can continue your abuse of
people unabated. You're not and it's by your own hand, not anything I
have done. You cannot blame me for finding a post where you gave out
your name. Only someone deluded could make that observation.

I'm NOT responsible for actions you have taken yourself.

On 29/11/2022 5:54 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
> On 29/11/2022 1:27 pm, Clocky wrote:
>> On 29/11/2022 9:49 am, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>> On 29/11/2022 1:40 am, Clocky wrote:
>>>> On 28/11/2022 3:38 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Like your silence when the troll posted my name?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> What about your complicity in silence to Grumpy's appalling
>>>> behaviour in here? He's a repeat offender but not a squeak in
>>>> protest from you...
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Really Clocky.
>>
>> That's what all the evidence clearly shows, so yes, *really*.
>> You're a repeat offender and a defamer. Fact.
>
> In your no so humble opinion. Face it clocky. You have defamed me by
> stating multiple things that I did not do. You lied. It's a fact no
> matter what spin you try to put on it. Get the hell over yourself. As I
> stated, you want to be anonymous so you can continue your abuse of
> people unabated. You're not and it's by your own hand, not anything I
> have done. You cannot blame me for finding a post where you gave out

But you can definitely be blamed for not knowing how to secure your
Facebook site. You can also be blamed for making public that 'orrible
pic of you with a motorcycle stuck up your arse crack! You know the one,
where your fat rolls are hanging over the side like a set of Harley
pannier bags. No doubt you had no clue how to secure that pic site
either. One small mercy to accidental viewers, you blurred out your head!

> your name. Only someone deluded could make that observation.

Deluded? Nah, deluded would be Darren if he thinks anyone believes his
trade qualification claims.
>
> I'm NOT responsible for actions you have taken yourself.
>

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On 29/11/2022 2:54 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
> On 29/11/2022 1:27 pm, Clocky wrote:
>> On 29/11/2022 9:49 am, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>> On 29/11/2022 1:40 am, Clocky wrote:
>>>> On 28/11/2022 3:38 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Like your silence when the troll posted my name?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> What about your complicity in silence to Grumpy's appalling
>>>> behaviour in here? He's a repeat offender but not a squeak in
>>>> protest from you...
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Really Clocky.
>>
>> That's what all the evidence clearly shows, so yes, *really*.
>> You're a repeat offender and a defamer. Fact.
>
> In your no so humble opinion.

I deal with facts, not opinion.

--
keith on the 7 Oct 2021 wrote;
"He asserts that the claim is true, so, if
it is unproven, he is lying."

Grumpy Tech wrote:
> On 29/11/2022 1:27 pm, Clocky wrote:
>> On 29/11/2022 9:49 am, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>> On 29/11/2022 1:40 am, Clocky wrote:
>>>> On 28/11/2022 3:38 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Like your silence when the troll posted my name?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> What about your complicity in silence to Grumpy's appalling
>>>> behaviour in here? He's a repeat offender but not a squeak in
>>>> protest from you...
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Really Clocky.
>>
>> That's what all the evidence clearly shows, so yes, *really*.
>> You're a repeat offender and a defamer. Fact.
>
> In your no so humble opinion. Face it clocky. You have defamed me by
> stating multiple things that I did not do. You lied. It's a fact no
> matter what spin you try to put on it. Get the hell over yourself. As
> I stated, you want to be anonymous so you can continue your abuse of
> people unabated. You're not and it's by your own hand, not anything I
> have done. You cannot blame me for finding a post where you gave out
> your name.

so you admit to your stalking then. case closed!

> Only someone deluded could make that observation.
>
> I'm NOT responsible for actions you have taken yourself.
>

--
https://tinyurl.com/Yosemite-Sam

FUCK PUTIN!!

Xeno wrote:
> On 29/11/2022 5:54 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>> On 29/11/2022 1:27 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>> On 29/11/2022 9:49 am, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>> On 29/11/2022 1:40 am, Clocky wrote:
>>>>> On 28/11/2022 3:38 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> Like your silence when the troll posted my name?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> What about your complicity in silence to Grumpy's appalling
>>>>> behaviour in here? He's a repeat offender but not a squeak in
>>>>> protest from you...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Really Clocky.
>>>
>>> That's what all the evidence clearly shows, so yes, *really*.
>>> You're a repeat offender and a defamer. Fact.
>>
>> In your no so humble opinion. Face it clocky. You have defamed me by
>> stating multiple things that I did not do. You lied. It's a fact no
>> matter what spin you try to put on it. Get the hell over yourself. As
>> I stated, you want to be anonymous so you can continue your abuse of
>> people unabated. You're not and it's by your own hand, not anything I
>> have done. You cannot blame me for finding a post where you gave out
>
> But you can definitely be blamed for not knowing how to secure your
> Facebook site. You can also be blamed for making public that 'orrible
> pic of you with a motorcycle stuck up your arse crack! You know the
> one, where your fat rolls are hanging over the side like a set of
> Harley pannier bags. No doubt you had no clue how to secure that pic
> site either. One small mercy to accidental viewers, you blurred out
> your head!
>

he can be and is blamed for trying to identify me and my place of
employment by posting a video he thought was of me.

>> your name. Only someone deluded could make that observation.
>
> Deluded? Nah, deluded would be Darren if he thinks anyone believes his
> trade qualification claims.
>>
>> I'm NOT responsible for actions you have taken yourself.
>>
>

--
https://tinyurl.com/Yosemite-Sam

FUCK PUTIN!!

On 29/11/2022 8:18 pm, Clocky wrote:
> On 29/11/2022 2:54 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>> On 29/11/2022 1:27 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>> On 29/11/2022 9:49 am, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>> On 29/11/2022 1:40 am, Clocky wrote:
>>>>> On 28/11/2022 3:38 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> Like your silence when the troll posted my name?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> What about your complicity in silence to Grumpy's appalling
>>>>> behaviour in here? He's a repeat offender but not a squeak in
>>>>> protest from you...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Really Clocky.
>>>
>>> That's what all the evidence clearly shows, so yes, *really*.
>>> You're a repeat offender and a defamer. Fact.
>>
>> In your no so humble opinion.
>
>
>
> I deal with facts, not opinion.
>

Well in that case, it's a fact that you lied. It's a fact that you
defamed me by stating something that you know is a lie.

There's the facts. I provided proof the other day.

On 29/11/2022 9:51 pm, yosemite sam wrote:
> Grumpy Tech wrote:
>> On 29/11/2022 1:27 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>> On 29/11/2022 9:49 am, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>> On 29/11/2022 1:40 am, Clocky wrote:
>>>>> On 28/11/2022 3:38 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> Like your silence when the troll posted my name?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> What about your complicity in silence to Grumpy's appalling
>>>>> behaviour in here? He's a repeat offender but not a squeak in
>>>>> protest from you...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Really Clocky.
>>>
>>> That's what all the evidence clearly shows, so yes, *really*.
>>> You're a repeat offender and a defamer. Fact.
>>
>> In your no so humble opinion. Face it clocky. You have defamed me by
>> stating multiple things that I did not do. You lied. It's a fact no
>> matter what spin you try to put on it. Get the hell over yourself. As
>> I stated, you want to be anonymous so you can continue your abuse of
>> people unabated. You're not and it's by your own hand, not anything I
>> have done. You cannot blame me for finding a post where you gave out
>> your name.
>
> so you admit to your stalking then. case closed!

I had seen the post when it was first made and recalled it. No stalking
involved idiot.
>
>> Only someone deluded could make that observation.
>>
>> I'm NOT responsible for actions you have taken yourself.
>>
>
>

Grumpy Tech wrote:
> On 29/11/2022 9:51 pm, yosemite sam wrote:
>> Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>> On 29/11/2022 1:27 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>> On 29/11/2022 9:49 am, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>> On 29/11/2022 1:40 am, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>> On 28/11/2022 3:38 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Like your silence when the troll posted my name?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What about your complicity in silence to Grumpy's appalling
>>>>>> behaviour in here? He's a repeat offender but not a squeak in
>>>>>> protest from you...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Really Clocky.
>>>>
>>>> That's what all the evidence clearly shows, so yes, *really*.
>>>> You're a repeat offender and a defamer. Fact.
>>>
>>> In your no so humble opinion. Face it clocky. You have defamed me by
>>> stating multiple things that I did not do. You lied. It's a fact no
>>> matter what spin you try to put on it. Get the hell over yourself.
>>> As I stated, you want to be anonymous so you can continue your abuse
>>> of people unabated. You're not and it's by your own hand, not
>>> anything I have done. You cannot blame me for finding a post where
>>> you gave out your name.
>>
>> so you admit to your stalking then. case closed!
>
> I had seen the post when it was first made and recalled it. No
> stalking involved idiot.

how or why had you seen it? under what circumstances did you see it?
what connection or association with that person did you have that led
you to see it?

--
https://tinyurl.com/Yosemite-Sam

FUCK PUTIN!!

On 29/11/2022 7:51 pm, yosemite sam wrote:
> Grumpy Tech wrote:
>> On 29/11/2022 1:27 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>> On 29/11/2022 9:49 am, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>> On 29/11/2022 1:40 am, Clocky wrote:
>>>>> On 28/11/2022 3:38 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> Like your silence when the troll posted my name?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> What about your complicity in silence to Grumpy's appalling
>>>>> behaviour in here? He's a repeat offender but not a squeak in
>>>>> protest from you...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Really Clocky.
>>>
>>> That's what all the evidence clearly shows, so yes, *really*.
>>> You're a repeat offender and a defamer. Fact.
>>
>> In your no so humble opinion. Face it clocky. You have defamed me by
>> stating multiple things that I did not do. You lied. It's a fact no
>> matter what spin you try to put on it. Get the hell over yourself. As
>> I stated, you want to be anonymous so you can continue your abuse of
>> people unabated. You're not and it's by your own hand, not anything I
>> have done. You cannot blame me for finding a post where you gave out
>> your name.
>
> so you admit to your stalking then. case closed!
>

He even used a very old post by me in another group asking for donations
of old computers to help out people in need as fucking ammunition for
his appalling behaviour.

Seriously, what sort of a lowlife does that and then tries to justify it?

--
keith on the 7 Oct 2021 wrote;
"He asserts that the claim is true, so, if
it is unproven, he is lying."

On 29/11/2022 10:02 pm, yosemite sam wrote:
> Grumpy Tech wrote:
>> On 29/11/2022 9:51 pm, yosemite sam wrote:
>>> Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>> On 29/11/2022 1:27 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>> On 29/11/2022 9:49 am, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>> On 29/11/2022 1:40 am, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>> On 28/11/2022 3:38 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Like your silence when the troll posted my name?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What about your complicity in silence to Grumpy's appalling
>>>>>>> behaviour in here? He's a repeat offender but not a squeak in
>>>>>>> protest from you...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Really Clocky.
>>>>>
>>>>> That's what all the evidence clearly shows, so yes, *really*.
>>>>> You're a repeat offender and a defamer. Fact.
>>>>
>>>> In your no so humble opinion. Face it clocky. You have defamed me by
>>>> stating multiple things that I did not do. You lied. It's a fact no
>>>> matter what spin you try to put on it. Get the hell over yourself.
>>>> As I stated, you want to be anonymous so you can continue your abuse
>>>> of people unabated. You're not and it's by your own hand, not
>>>> anything I have done. You cannot blame me for finding a post where
>>>> you gave out your name.
>>>
>>> so you admit to your stalking then. case closed!
>>
>> I had seen the post when it was first made and recalled it. No
>> stalking involved idiot.
>
> how or why had you seen it? under what circumstances did you see it?
> what connection or association with that person did you have that led
> you to see it?
>
>

He would not have made the connection that I'm the same person from that
post, he could only have done that trawling backwards.

Fact.

--
keith on the 7 Oct 2021 wrote;
"He asserts that the claim is true, so, if
it is unproven, he is lying."

Clocky wrote:
> On 29/11/2022 10:02 pm, yosemite sam wrote:
>> Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>> On 29/11/2022 9:51 pm, yosemite sam wrote:
>>>> Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>> On 29/11/2022 1:27 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>> On 29/11/2022 9:49 am, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>>> On 29/11/2022 1:40 am, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 28/11/2022 3:38 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Like your silence when the troll posted my name?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What about your complicity in silence to Grumpy's appalling
>>>>>>>> behaviour in here? He's a repeat offender but not a squeak in
>>>>>>>> protest from you...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Really Clocky.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's what all the evidence clearly shows, so yes, *really*.
>>>>>> You're a repeat offender and a defamer. Fact.
>>>>>
>>>>> In your no so humble opinion. Face it clocky. You have defamed me
>>>>> by stating multiple things that I did not do. You lied. It's a
>>>>> fact no matter what spin you try to put on it. Get the hell over
>>>>> yourself. As I stated, you want to be anonymous so you can
>>>>> continue your abuse of people unabated. You're not and it's by
>>>>> your own hand, not anything I have done. You cannot blame me for
>>>>> finding a post where you gave out your name.
>>>>
>>>> so you admit to your stalking then. case closed!
>>>
>>> I had seen the post when it was first made and recalled it. No
>>> stalking involved idiot.
>>
>> how or why had you seen it? under what circumstances did you see it?
>> what connection or association with that person did you have that led
>> you to see it?
>>
>>
>
> He would not have made the connection that I'm the same person from
> that post, he could only have done that trawling backwards.
>
> Fact.
>

ok I got confused. (posting late at night!) I was asking about the video
he posted thinking it was me.

--
https://tinyurl.com/Yosemite-Sam

FUCK PUTIN!!

On 30/11/2022 11:55 am, yosemite sam wrote:
> Clocky wrote:
>> On 29/11/2022 10:02 pm, yosemite sam wrote:
>>> Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>> On 29/11/2022 9:51 pm, yosemite sam wrote:
>>>>> Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>> On 29/11/2022 1:27 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>> On 29/11/2022 9:49 am, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 29/11/2022 1:40 am, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 28/11/2022 3:38 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Like your silence when the troll posted my name?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What about your complicity in silence to Grumpy's appalling
>>>>>>>>> behaviour in here? He's a repeat offender but not a squeak in
>>>>>>>>> protest from you...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Really Clocky.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That's what all the evidence clearly shows, so yes, *really*.
>>>>>>> You're a repeat offender and a defamer. Fact.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In your no so humble opinion. Face it clocky. You have defamed me
>>>>>> by stating multiple things that I did not do. You lied. It's a
>>>>>> fact no matter what spin you try to put on it. Get the hell over
>>>>>> yourself. As I stated, you want to be anonymous so you can
>>>>>> continue your abuse of people unabated. You're not and it's by
>>>>>> your own hand, not anything I have done. You cannot blame me for
>>>>>> finding a post where you gave out your name.
>>>>>
>>>>> so you admit to your stalking then. case closed!
>>>>
>>>> I had seen the post when it was first made and recalled it. No
>>>> stalking involved idiot.
>>>
>>> how or why had you seen it? under what circumstances did you see it?
>>> what connection or association with that person did you have that led
>>> you to see it?
>>>
>>>
>>
>> He would not have made the connection that I'm the same person from
>> that post, he could only have done that trawling backwards.
>>
>> Fact.
>>
>
> ok I got confused. (posting late at night!) I was asking about the video
> he posted thinking it was me.
>

Your question in relation to that video is a fair one however and it's
yet another example of his willingness to post others peoples details
here. Why did he think it OK to post what he thought was a video of you
which would have identified you here? Never mind that he was wrong and
defamed someone else who had no connection to this group at all...

--
keith on the 7 Oct 2021 wrote;
"He asserts that the claim is true, so, if
it is unproven, he is lying."

Clocky wrote:
> On 30/11/2022 11:55 am, yosemite sam wrote:
>> Clocky wrote:
>>> On 29/11/2022 10:02 pm, yosemite sam wrote:
>>>> Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>> On 29/11/2022 9:51 pm, yosemite sam wrote:
>>>>>> Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>>> On 29/11/2022 1:27 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 29/11/2022 9:49 am, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 29/11/2022 1:40 am, Clocky wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 28/11/2022 3:38 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Like your silence when the troll posted my name?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> What about your complicity in silence to Grumpy's appalling
>>>>>>>>>> behaviour in here? He's a repeat offender but not a squeak in
>>>>>>>>>> protest from you...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Really Clocky.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That's what all the evidence clearly shows, so yes, *really*.
>>>>>>>> You're a repeat offender and a defamer. Fact.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In your no so humble opinion. Face it clocky. You have defamed
>>>>>>> me by stating multiple things that I did not do. You lied. It's
>>>>>>> a fact no matter what spin you try to put on it. Get the hell
>>>>>>> over yourself. As I stated, you want to be anonymous so you can
>>>>>>> continue your abuse of people unabated. You're not and it's by
>>>>>>> your own hand, not anything I have done. You cannot blame me for
>>>>>>> finding a post where you gave out your name.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> so you admit to your stalking then. case closed!
>>>>>
>>>>> I had seen the post when it was first made and recalled it. No
>>>>> stalking involved idiot.
>>>>
>>>> how or why had you seen it? under what circumstances did you see
>>>> it? what connection or association with that person did you have
>>>> that led you to see it?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> He would not have made the connection that I'm the same person from
>>> that post, he could only have done that trawling backwards.
>>>
>>> Fact.
>>>
>>
>> ok I got confused. (posting late at night!) I was asking about the
>> video he posted thinking it was me.
>>
>
> Your question in relation to that video is a fair one

of course. how did he know of the video? unless he went looking.

> however and it's yet another example of his willingness to post others
> peoples details here.

yep

> Why did he think it OK to post what he thought was a video of you
> which would have identified you here?

he aint called grubby for no good reason!..

> Never mind that he was wrong and defamed someone else who had no
> connection to this group at all...
>

--
https://tinyurl.com/Yosemite-Sam

FUCK PUTIN!!

keithr0 <user@account.invalid> wrote in
news:julkosFmb6dU1@mid.individual.net:

> On 29/11/2022 1:30 am, Clocky wrote:
>> On 28/11/2022 4:00 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 25/11/2022 5:43 pm, alvey wrote:
>>>> yosemite sam <felix@goaway.com> wrote in
>>>> news:juaob1F25liU1@mid.individual.net:
>>>>
>>>>> alvey wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> I disagree with attacking people's appearance Gumps,
>>>>>
>>>>> but not posting real names. ???
>>>>
>>>> Depends. This issue, like many things in Life, isn't black or
>>>> white. Overwhelmingly I don't do it, but if someone baselessly and
>>>> witlessly flames/abuses me then 'No', I don't have any problem
>>>> whatsoever in revealing. Just encouraging good behaviour y'see...
>>>
>>> So I've been baselessly and witlessly flaming and abusing you?
>>>
>>> What a fragile little princess you must be, quite at odds with your
>>> postings here that mainly consist of flames and abuse. That would
>>> seem to make you a 100% pure, government inspected, export quality,
>>> lifetime guaranteed hypocrite.
>>
>> You just described yourself keith.
>>
>>
> It must have taken a major intellectual effort for you to have come up
> with such a devastating reply.

Oh, you're back Richo. And why? I didn't think that we were so far under
our quota of cliches. Or are the Lightweight Nationals on?

alvey

On 29/11/2022 8:18 pm, Clocky wrote:
> On 29/11/2022 2:54 pm, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>> On 29/11/2022 1:27 pm, Clocky wrote:
>>> On 29/11/2022 9:49 am, Grumpy Tech wrote:
>>>> On 29/11/2022 1:40 am, Clocky wrote:
>>>>> On 28/11/2022 3:38 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> Like your silence when the troll posted my name?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> What about your complicity in silence to Grumpy's appalling
>>>>> behaviour in here? He's a repeat offender but not a squeak in
>>>>> protest from you...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Really Clocky.
>>>
>>> That's what all the evidence clearly shows, so yes, *really*.
>>> You're a repeat offender and a defamer. Fact.
>>
>> In your no so humble opinion.
>
>
>
> I deal with facts, not opinion.

That's the funniest thing that you have posted in eons.