What's your view on sacred cows and artificial insemination ?

Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hmm, no reaction at all, in this free-for-all open medium that is
> sci.physics from the learned asses, apes, roaches, etc. lording or
> crawling in the establishments, let alone any alpha-ape!
> Truth is hard to defeat except by indifference and gross lies; they take
> the former approach for now. Gotta think about CAREER, what.
> I suppose I should be glad that they have not killed me yet!
> Thanks.
>
> On Saturday, 28 October 2023 at 17:26:43 UTC+11, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
>> This graph shows what is impossible by classical and modern physics -
>> the movement of matter by internal force, thus violating the principle
>> of inertia, the bedrock of classical and modern physics. The
>> conservation of energy laws, the notion of entropy, the big bang theory,
>> relativiity theories with the law of conservation of mass and energy,
>> quantum theories - these are all upset by this simple 2 second
>> experiment. But what is the centre of mass?
>>
>> Take two balls of 1 Kg each and place them 1 m apart. The centre of mass
>> is midway as they are of same mass. Now take one ball and move it away
>> by 1 m. The centre of mass is still halfway, but it has moved by 50cm.
>> Point is, that and external force is needed to change the centre of
>> mass. When we walk, we press upon the ground to move forward, and the
>> force from ground is the external force. On slippery ice, say, where we
>> cannot move, our centre of mass remains unchanged. Internal force simply
>> cannot change the centre of mass - even when a missile explodes. Then
>> the constituent parts go off in different directions, but the centre of
>> mass follows the earlier trajectory as per physics texts. All correct so far.
>>
>> In this experiement the armature weighs 2.98 Kg and the gun weighs
>> 8.72Kg. At the start, with respect to the scale on the ground, their
>> respective centres of masses are at 67 cm and 75 cm. (The pointer shows
>> 80 cm, and that is used to track the movement of the gun, not the centre
>> of mass.) Thus knowing the masses and positions, the initial centre of
>> mass is about 73 cm, Now no matter what happens, as per theory, this has
>> to remain constant when internal force is applied to the motor via the
>> electric current from the supercapacitors.
>>
>> The graph and video show that to happen for the first 300 milliseconds -
>> when no current is applied, and when the armature accelerates upon the
>> rails, pushing the gun back. But as the armature continues to
>> accelerate, the pushback upon the gun gets less so the centre of mass
>> moves forward. That is, there is an acceleration acting upon the centre
>> of mass! This stops when the armature hits the stops, then the movement
>> of the armature, gun and centre of mass naturally follow the same way.
>> But after the moving armature hits the stops at the end, the momentum is
>> transferred and the whole system gets an acceleration. When the momentum
>> transfier is completed, from the armature to the whole system, the
>> entire system keeps on moving forward steadily! Yes it does get slowed
>> with friction and finally with the part of the stop that had been
>> knocked over. Had there be no friction invovled, nor the external
>> interference it would have continued to move for ever.
>>
>> Now why is this the first graph of its kind... ? Well, this has been
>> possible because a new equipment - supecapacitors - have been used that
>> generate in this case 4000 amperes of current with little mass or volume
>> involved. This new item causes the discovery that under certain
>> engineering situations, like this rail gun assembly, where a conductor
>> moves and can pass its momentum to the whole system, there is violation
>> of the inertia principle. Then this is a new invention - a very powerful
>> rail gun, at least ten times more efficient as seen from the data of
>> existing military rail guns - of mine, the earliest model which I
>> created back in 2015, for my PhD work. Finally, such is the human
>> condition (when not spiritually inclined we are apes are we not so as
>> apes must ape the alpha apes) that no one dares to question what the
>> great people in great institutions all over the world say with all the
>> money and power and inffluence behind them.
>>
>> So, this graph can never be published in any scientific journal as it
>> violates the most fundemental principle, that of inertia, most sacred!
>> And indeed this principle is generally valid. But hanging on to it will
>> confine us to Earth, never take us to the stars. And before that, we
>> cannot have extremly fast and safe travel on Earth, cheap energy
>> available to all, and a far better understanding of the ways of the
>> Universe, with all forces unified as electric and electromagnetic,
>> involving protons, electrons and aether... From this experiment, the
>> universe itself gets straightened out, made infinite, with no beginning
>> nor end. Well, it may take decades or centuries for these new ideas to
>> take hold. Hopefully, much sooner, thanks to Facebook, Usenet, and
>> Youtube. Bypassing journals and learned people ensconced there, may be
>> the best hope for humanity.
>>
>> https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbidu26174314076967&set=pcb.7526275530733512
>

--

Check out our SAVVY module prototype that facilitates a movable / resizable
DIALOG and complex dropdown MENU interface deploying the third party d3
library.
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?heuristic>
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/Savvy.zip> (Download resources)

It's a reply on an open medium--when will you cease being an
"unconstitutional occupier" of our land?

Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sunday, 29 October 2023 at 13:17:39 UTC+11, dolf wrote:
>> What's your view on sacred cows and artificial insemination ?
> What has that to do with the below?
>> Arindam Banerjee <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hmm, no reaction at all, in this free-for-all open medium that is
>>> sci.physics from the learned asses, apes, roaches, etc. lording or
>>> crawling in the establishments, let alone any alpha-ape!
>>> Truth is hard to defeat except by indifference and gross lies; they take
>>> the former approach for now. Gotta think about CAREER, what.
>>> I suppose I should be glad that they have not killed me yet!
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> On Saturday, 28 October 2023 at 17:26:43 UTC+11, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
>>>> This graph shows what is impossible by classical and modern physics -
>>>> the movement of matter by internal force, thus violating the principle
>>>> of inertia, the bedrock of classical and modern physics. The
>>>> conservation of energy laws, the notion of entropy, the big bang theory,
>>>> relativiity theories with the law of conservation of mass and energy,
>>>> quantum theories - these are all upset by this simple 2 second
>>>> experiment. But what is the centre of mass?
>>>>
>>>> Take two balls of 1 Kg each and place them 1 m apart. The centre of mass
>>>> is midway as they are of same mass. Now take one ball and move it away
>>>> by 1 m. The centre of mass is still halfway, but it has moved by 50cm.
>>>> Point is, that and external force is needed to change the centre of
>>>> mass. When we walk, we press upon the ground to move forward, and the
>>>> force from ground is the external force. On slippery ice, say, where we
>>>> cannot move, our centre of mass remains unchanged. Internal force simply
>>>> cannot change the centre of mass - even when a missile explodes. Then
>>>> the constituent parts go off in different directions, but the centre of
>>>> mass follows the earlier trajectory as per physics texts. All correct so far.
>>>>
>>>> In this experiement the armature weighs 2.98 Kg and the gun weighs
>>>> 8.72Kg. At the start, with respect to the scale on the ground, their
>>>> respective centres of masses are at 67 cm and 75 cm. (The pointer shows
>>>> 80 cm, and that is used to track the movement of the gun, not the centre
>>>> of mass.) Thus knowing the masses and positions, the initial centre of
>>>> mass is about 73 cm, Now no matter what happens, as per theory, this has
>>>> to remain constant when internal force is applied to the motor via the
>>>> electric current from the supercapacitors.
>>>>
>>>> The graph and video show that to happen for the first 300 milliseconds -
>>>> when no current is applied, and when the armature accelerates upon the
>>>> rails, pushing the gun back. But as the armature continues to
>>>> accelerate, the pushback upon the gun gets less so the centre of mass
>>>> moves forward. That is, there is an acceleration acting upon the centre
>>>> of mass! This stops when the armature hits the stops, then the movement
>>>> of the armature, gun and centre of mass naturally follow the same way.
>>>> But after the moving armature hits the stops at the end, the momentum is
>>>> transferred and the whole system gets an acceleration. When the momentum
>>>> transfier is completed, from the armature to the whole system, the
>>>> entire system keeps on moving forward steadily! Yes it does get slowed
>>>> with friction and finally with the part of the stop that had been
>>>> knocked over. Had there be no friction invovled, nor the external
>>>> interference it would have continued to move for ever.
>>>>
>>>> Now why is this the first graph of its kind... ? Well, this has been
>>>> possible because a new equipment - supecapacitors - have been used that
>>>> generate in this case 4000 amperes of current with little mass or volume
>>>> involved. This new item causes the discovery that under certain
>>>> engineering situations, like this rail gun assembly, where a conductor
>>>> moves and can pass its momentum to the whole system, there is violation
>>>> of the inertia principle. Then this is a new invention - a very powerful
>>>> rail gun, at least ten times more efficient as seen from the data of
>>>> existing military rail guns - of mine, the earliest model which I
>>>> created back in 2015, for my PhD work. Finally, such is the human
>>>> condition (when not spiritually inclined we are apes are we not so as
>>>> apes must ape the alpha apes) that no one dares to question what the
>>>> great people in great institutions all over the world say with all the
>>>> money and power and inffluence behind them.
>>>>
>>>> So, this graph can never be published in any scientific journal as it
>>>> violates the most fundemental principle, that of inertia, most sacred!
>>>> And indeed this principle is generally valid. But hanging on to it will
>>>> confine us to Earth, never take us to the stars. And before that, we
>>>> cannot have extremly fast and safe travel on Earth, cheap energy
>>>> available to all, and a far better understanding of the ways of the
>>>> Universe, with all forces unified as electric and electromagnetic,
>>>> involving protons, electrons and aether... From this experiment, the
>>>> universe itself gets straightened out, made infinite, with no beginning
>>>> nor end. Well, it may take decades or centuries for these new ideas to
>>>> take hold. Hopefully, much sooner, thanks to Facebook, Usenet, and
>>>> Youtube. Bypassing journals and learned people ensconced there, may be
>>>> the best hope for humanity.
>>>>
>>>> https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbidu26174314076967&set=pcb.7526275530733512
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Check out our SAVVY module prototype that facilitates a movable / resizable
>> DIALOG and complex dropdown MENU interface deploying the third party d3
>> library.
>>
>> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?heuristic>
>>
>> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/Savvy.zip> (Download resources)
>

--

Check out our SAVVY module prototype that facilitates a movable / resizable
DIALOG and complex dropdown MENU interface deploying the third party d3
library.
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?heuristic>
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/Savvy.zip> (Download resources)