We have the actionable task {} module devised and our weekend activity
will be to code the build function...

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Foresight%20Pragma>

Our next development of the GRUMBLE prototype as dataset reference
objects will be to extend the neural lingustic pragma by a formulation
of #451 - PRAXIS as MALE / FEME pairing applied to the priority ONTIC /
DEME and final tally emphasis GRUMBLE (#203, #247)@[4, 53] / GRUNTLE
(#828, #450)@[45, 53] as hypothetically the priority determination made
of each.

#81 --> #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY = #532
#81 --> #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY = #532

#1064 = #532 + #532 as [#80, #100, #70, #10, #4, #800] = proeídō
(G4275): {UMBRA: #1064 % #41 = #39} 1) to foresee;

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?date:2023.12.7&time:08.30&heuristic>

GRUMBLE (#203, #247)@[5, 5, 68, 63, 2, 15, 34, 32, 18, 65, 19, 1, 21, 2,
32, 11, 4, 53]

GRUNTLE (#828, #450)@[5, 5, 10, 5, 78, 68, 60, 63, 62, 2, 77, 15, 30,
34, 62, 32, 80, 18, 64, 65, 2, 19, 3, 1, 24, 21, 26, 2, 58, 32, 69, 11,
73, 4, 45, 53]

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Foresight%20Pragma>

- dolf

--
Check out our SAVVY module prototype that facilitates a movable /
resizable DIALOG and complex dropdown MENU interface deploying the third
party d3 library.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?heuristic>

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/Savvy.zip> (Download resources)

I think we have coded that semantical proposition "extend the neural
lingustic pragma by a formulation of #451 - PRAXIS as MALE / FEME
pairing applied to the priority ONTIC / DEME and final tally emphasis
GRUMBLE (#203, #247)@[4, 53] / GRUNTLE (#828, #450)@[45, 53] as
hypothetically the priority determination made of each"

Its actually the EGO / SUPER elements which we have a concern for
whenever priority ONTIC / DEME selector occurs

The metaphysical proposition is that FORESIGHT (meta descriptor dynamic
natural associate) is then a meta outcome (2 ... 162) conforming to #902
- RULE OF LAW against which probability of occurrence is applied ...

Whilst the CUSHION (as GRUMBLE --> place in good humour) elements are an
abstraction which don't provide a coherent neural linguistic pragma
context we have nevertheless computed them for a future consideration

Our next coding task will be enable the SPIRAL SELECTOR@{} to view the
FORESIGHT data objects.

On 8/12/2023 12:27, dolf wrote:
> We have the actionable task {} module devised and our weekend activity
> will be to code the build function...
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Foresight%20Pragma>
>

build: function (strongs, telos, word, item) {

var meme = Savvy.GNOSIS.getGrappleMemeObject(word);
var index = 0;
doNode (this.GRUMBLE, meme, strongs, meme.telos, total (meme.telos));
meme = Savvy.GNOSIS.getGrappleMemeObject(meme.grumble.data);
doNode (this.GRUNTLE, meme, strongs, meme.telos, total (meme.telos));
return;
function doNode (sphere, meme, strongs, word, tally) {
var demes = new Array (meme.tally).fill(false);
var final = false;
for (var is in meme.vMeme) {
switch (true) {
case (meme.demes.DEME.male.includes(meme.vMeme[is].M)) :
case (meme.demes.DEME.feme.includes(meme.vMeme[is].M)) :
case (meme.demes.DEME.male.includes(meme.vMeme[is].F)) :
case (meme.demes.DEME.feme.includes(meme.vMeme[is].F)) :
case (meme.demes.ONTIC.male.includes(meme.vMeme[is].M)) :
case (meme.demes.ONTIC.feme.includes(meme.vMeme[is].M)) :
case (meme.demes.ONTIC.male.includes(meme.vMeme[is].F)) :
case (meme.demes.ONTIC.feme.includes(meme.vMeme[is].F)) :
demes[is] = true;
}
}
while ((is = demes.indexOf(true)) != -1) {
node (sphere, meme.vMeme[is].S+meme.vMeme[is].E+902, strongs, word,
tally);
demes[is] = false;
final = true;
}
if (final)
node (sphere,
meme.vMeme[meme.tally-1].S+meme.vMeme[meme.tally-1].E+902, strongs,
word, tally);
}
// other code
}

> Our next development of the GRUMBLE prototype as dataset reference
> objects will be to extend the neural lingustic pragma by a formulation
> of #451 - PRAXIS as MALE / FEME pairing applied to the priority ONTIC /
> DEME  and final tally emphasis GRUMBLE (#203, #247)@[4, 53] / GRUNTLE
> (#828, #450)@[45, 53] as hypothetically the priority determination made
> of each.
>
> #81 --> #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY = #532
> #81 --> #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY = #532
>
> #1064 = #532 + #532 as [#80, #100, #70, #10, #4, #800] = proeídō
> (G4275): {UMBRA: #1064 % #41 = #39} 1) to foresee;
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?date:2023.12.7&time:08.30&heuristic>
>
> GRUMBLE (#203, #247)@[5, 5, 68, 63, 2, 15, 34, 32, 18, 65, 19, 1, 21, 2,
> 32, 11, 4, 53]
>
> GRUNTLE (#828, #450)@[5, 5, 10, 5, 78, 68, 60, 63, 62, 2, 77, 15, 30,
> 34, 62, 32, 80, 18, 64, 65, 2, 19, 3, 1, 24, 21, 26, 2, 58, 32, 69, 11,
> 73, 4, 45, 53]
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Foresight%20Pragma>
>
> - dolf
>

--
Check out our SAVVY module prototype that facilitates a movable /
resizable DIALOG and complex dropdown MENU interface deploying the third
party d3 library.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?heuristic>

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/Savvy.zip> (Download resources)

CORRECTION: CUSHION (as GRUNTLE --> place in good humour) elements

I think we have coded that semantical proposition "extend the neural
linguistic pragma by a formulation of #451 - PRAXIS as MALE / FEME
pairing applied to the priority ONTIC / DEME and final tally emphasis
GRUMBLE (#203, #247)@[4, 53] / GRUNTLE (#828, #450)@[45, 53] as
hypothetically the priority determination made of each"

Its actually the EGO / SUPER elements which we have a concern for
whenever priority ONTIC / DEME selector occurs

The metaphysical proposition is that FORESIGHT (meta descriptor dynamic
natural associator) is then a meta outcome (2 ... 162) conforming to
#902 - RULE OF LAW against which probability of occurrence is applied ...

Whilst the CUSHION (as GRUNTLE --> place in good humour) elements are an
abstraction which don't provide a coherent neural linguistic pragma
context we have nevertheless computed them for a future consideration

Our next coding task will be enable the SPIRAL SELECTOR@{} to view the
FORESIGHT data objects.

On 8/12/2023 12:27, dolf wrote:
> We have the actionable task {} module devised and our weekend activity
> will be to code the build function...
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Foresight%20Pragma>
>

build: function (strongs, telos, word, item) {

var meme = Savvy.GNOSIS.getGrappleMemeObject(word);
var index = 0;
doNode (this.GRUMBLE, meme, strongs, meme.telos, total (meme.telos));
meme = Savvy.GNOSIS.getGrappleMemeObject(meme.grumble.data);
doNode (this.GRUNTLE, meme, strongs, meme.telos, total (meme.telos));
return;
function doNode (sphere, meme, strongs, word, tally) {
var demes = new Array (meme.tally).fill(false);
var final = false;
for (var is in meme.vMeme) {
switch (true) {
case (meme.demes.DEME.male.includes(meme.vMeme[is].M)) :
case (meme.demes.DEME.feme.includes(meme.vMeme[is].M)) :
case (meme.demes.DEME.male.includes(meme.vMeme[is].F)) :
case (meme.demes.DEME.feme.includes(meme.vMeme[is].F)) :
case (meme.demes.ONTIC.male.includes(meme.vMeme[is].M)) :
case (meme.demes.ONTIC.feme.includes(meme.vMeme[is].M)) :
case (meme.demes.ONTIC.male.includes(meme.vMeme[is].F)) :
case (meme.demes.ONTIC.feme.includes(meme.vMeme[is].F)) :
demes[is] = true;
}
}
while ((is = demes.indexOf(true)) != -1) {
node (sphere, meme.vMeme[is].S+meme.vMeme[is].E+902, strongs, word,
tally);
demes[is] = false;
final = true;
}
if (final)
node (sphere,
meme.vMeme[meme.tally-1].S+meme.vMeme[meme.tally-1].E+902, strongs,
word, tally);
}
// other code
}

> Our next development of the GRUMBLE prototype as dataset reference
> objects will be to extend the neural lingustic pragma by a formulation
> of #451 - PRAXIS as MALE / FEME pairing applied to the priority ONTIC /
> DEME  and final tally emphasis GRUMBLE (#203, #247)@[4, 53] / GRUNTLE
> (#828, #450)@[45, 53] as hypothetically the priority determination made
> of each.
>
> #81 --> #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY = #532
> #81 --> #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY = #532
>
> #1064 = #532 + #532 as [#80, #100, #70, #10, #4, #800] = proeídō
> (G4275): {UMBRA: #1064 % #41 = #39} 1) to foresee;
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?date:2023.12.7&time:08.30&heuristic>
>
> GRUMBLE (#203, #247)@[5, 5, 68, 63, 2, 15, 34, 32, 18, 65, 19, 1, 21, 2,
> 32, 11, 4, 53]
>
> GRUNTLE (#828, #450)@[5, 5, 10, 5, 78, 68, 60, 63, 62, 2, 77, 15, 30,
> 34, 62, 32, 80, 18, 64, 65, 2, 19, 3, 1, 24, 21, 26, 2, 58, 32, 69, 11,
> 73, 4, 45, 53]
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Foresight%20Pragma>
>
> - dolf
>

--
Check out our SAVVY module prototype that facilitates a movable /
resizable DIALOG and complex dropdown MENU interface deploying the third
party d3 library.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?heuristic>

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/Savvy.zip> (Download resources)

Just a further comment a file named G1005.json will contain the paired "EGO
/ SUPER elements which we have a concern for whenever priority ONTIC / DEME
selector occurs" and such equates to EGO + SUPER + #902 - RULE OF LAW as a
+/- dynamic which is different to regarding the value #1005 as teleological
/ noumenon redacted concept relative to FORESIGHT.

We don't know what is the determinant for instance in this example the DEME
selector is #73 as a magnitude applied to #68 - DIMMING / #519 but we don't
know if it's possible to use another variant such as #27 - DUTY (minus #41)
and whether this can be balanced #63 - WATCH + #41 = #104 % #81 = #23

DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #73 - COMPLETION (CH’ENG)

{@2: Sup: 68 - DIMMING: MENG (#73 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED {%26}); Ego: 63 -
WATCH: SHIH (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY DOMAIN
{%42})}

#68 --> #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY = #519
#63 --> #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY = #514

#1033 = #519 + #514 as [#500, #100, #70, #50, #8, #300, #5] = phronéō
(G5426): {UMBRA: #1525 % #41 = #8} 1) to have understanding, be wise; 2) to
feel, to think; 2a) to have an opinion of one's self, think of one's self,
to be modest, *NOT* *LET* *ONE’S* *OPINION* (*THOUGH* *JUST*) *OF*
*HIMSELF* *EXCEED* *THE* *BOUNDS* *OF* *MODESTY*; 2b) to think or judge
what one's opinion is; 2c) to be of the same mind i.e. agreed together,
cherish the same views, be harmonious; 3) to direct one's mind to a thing,
to seek, to strive for; 3a) to seek one's interest or advantage; 3b) to be
of one's *PARTY*, side with him (in public affairs);

dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
> CORRECTION: CUSHION (as GRUNTLE --> place in good humour) elements
>
> I think we have coded that semantical proposition "extend the neural
> linguistic pragma by a formulation of #451 - PRAXIS as MALE / FEME
> pairing applied to the priority ONTIC / DEME and final tally emphasis
> GRUMBLE (#203, #247)@[4, 53] / GRUNTLE (#828, #450)@[45, 53] as
> hypothetically the priority determination made of each"
>
> Its actually the EGO / SUPER elements which we have a concern for
> whenever priority ONTIC / DEME selector occurs
>
> The metaphysical proposition is that FORESIGHT (meta descriptor dynamic
> natural associator) is then a meta outcome (... 162) conforming to
> #902 - RULE OF LAW against which probability of occurrence is applied ...
>
> Whilst the CUSHION (as GRUNTLE --> place in good humour) elements are an
> abstraction which don't provide a coherent neural linguistic pragma
> context we have nevertheless computed them for a future consideration
>
> Our next coding task will be enable the SPIRAL SELECTOR@{} to view the
> FORESIGHT data objects.
>
> On 8/12/2023 12:27, dolf wrote:
>> We have the actionable task {} module devised and our weekend activity
>> will be to code the build function...
>>
>> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Foresight%20Pragma>
>>
>
> build: function (strongs, telos, word, item) {
>
> var meme = Savvy.GNOSIS.getGrappleMemeObject(word);
> var index = 0;
>
> doNode (this.GRUMBLE, meme, strongs, meme.telos, total (meme.telos));
> meme = Savvy.GNOSIS.getGrappleMemeObject(meme.grumble.data);
> doNode (this.GRUNTLE, meme, strongs, meme.telos, total (meme.telos));
>
> return;
>
> function doNode (sphere, meme, strongs, word, tally) {
>
> var demes = new Array (meme.tally).fill(false);
> var final = false;
>
> for (var is in meme.vMeme) {
> switch (true) {
> case (meme.demes.DEME.male.includes(meme.vMeme[is].M)) :
> case (meme.demes.DEME.feme.includes(meme.vMeme[is].M)) :
> case (meme.demes.DEME.male.includes(meme.vMeme[is].F)) :
> case (meme.demes.DEME.feme.includes(meme.vMeme[is].F)) :
> case (meme.demes.ONTIC.male.includes(meme.vMeme[is].M)) :
> case (meme.demes.ONTIC.feme.includes(meme.vMeme[is].M)) :
> case (meme.demes.ONTIC.male.includes(meme.vMeme[is].F)) :
> case (meme.demes.ONTIC.feme.includes(meme.vMeme[is].F)) :
> demes[is] = true;
> }
> }
>
> while ((is = demes.indexOf(true)) != -1) {
> node (sphere, meme.vMeme[is].S+meme.vMeme[is].E+902, strongs, word,
> tally);
> demes[is] = false;
> final = true;
> }
>
> if (final)
> node (sphere,
> meme.vMeme[meme.tally-1].S+meme.vMeme[meme.tally-1].E+902, strongs,
> word, tally);
>
> }
>
> // other code
>
> }
>
>> Our next development of the GRUMBLE prototype as dataset reference
>> objects will be to extend the neural lingustic pragma by a formulation
>> of #451 - PRAXIS as MALE / FEME pairing applied to the priority ONTIC /
>> DEME  and final tally emphasis GRUMBLE (#203, #247)@[4, 53] / GRUNTLE
>> (#828, #450)@[45, 53] as hypothetically the priority determination made
>> of each.
>>
>> #81 --> #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY = #532
>> #81 --> #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY = #532
>>
>> #1064 = #532 + #532 as [#80, #100, #70, #10, #4, #800] = proeídō
>> (G4275): {UMBRA: #1064 % #41 = #39} 1) to foresee;
>>
>> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?date:2023.12.7&time:08.30&heuristic>
>>
>> GRUMBLE (#203, #247)@[5, 5, 68, 63, 2, 15, 34, 32, 18, 65, 19, 1, 21, 2,
>> 32, 11, 4, 53]
>>
>> GRUNTLE (#828, #450)@[5, 5, 10, 5, 78, 68, 60, 63, 62, 2, 77, 15, 30,
>> 34, 62, 32, 80, 18, 64, 65, 2, 19, 3, 1, 24, 21, 26, 2, 58, 32, 69, 11,
>> 73, 4, 45, 53]
>>
>> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Foresight%20Pragma>
>>
>> - dolf
>>
>

--

Check out our SAVVY module prototype that facilitates a movable / resizable
DIALOG and complex dropdown MENU interface deploying the third party d3
library.
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?heuristic>
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/Savvy.zip> (Download resources)

dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Just a further comment a file named G1005.json will contain the paired "EGO
> / SUPER elements which we have a concern for whenever priority ONTIC / DEME
> selector occurs" and such equates to EGO + SUPER + #902 - RULE OF LAW as a
> +/- dynamic which is different to regarding the value #1005 as teleological
> / noumenon redacted concept relative to FORESIGHT.

We've already identified that the memeBrain #451 - praxis of rationality
spectrum (#452 ... #532) as dynamic natural associator pairing presents
matters of consideration and what I want to see is the nature of any
relationship with the ONTIC / DEME grounding as FORESIGHT construct which
we'll need to visualise as limits.

So our next development action will be to view the example G1005.json file
in tabular terms of MALE / FEME, ONTIC / DEME selector and STRONGS
reference.

We'll start that tomorrow and we may subsequently include the concept {}
form in our spiral selector@{}

>
> We don't know what is the determinant for instance in this example the DEME
> selector is #73 as a magnitude applied to #68 - DIMMING / #519 but we don't
> know if it's possible to use another variant such as #27 - DUTY (minus #41)
> and whether this can be balanced #63 - WATCH + #41 = #104 % #81 = #23
>
> DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #73 - COMPLETION (CH’ENG)
>
> {@2: Sup: 68 - DIMMING: MENG (#73 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED {%26}); Ego: 63 -
> WATCH: SHIH (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY DOMAIN
> {%42})}
>
> #68 --> #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY = #519
> #63 --> #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY = #514
>
> #1033 = #519 + #514 as [#500, #100, #70, #50, #8, #300, #5] = phronéō
> (G5426): {UMBRA: #1525 % #41 = #8} 1) to have understanding, be wise; 2) to
> feel, to think; 2a) to have an opinion of one's self, think of one's self,
> to be modest, *NOT* *LET* *ONE’S* *OPINION* (*THOUGH* *JUST*) *OF*
> *HIMSELF* *EXCEED* *THE* *BOUNDS* *OF* *MODESTY*; 2b) to think or judge
> what one's opinion is; 2c) to be of the same mind i.e. agreed together,
> cherish the same views, be harmonious; 3) to direct one's mind to a thing,
> to seek, to strive for; 3a) to seek one's interest or advantage; 3b) to be
> of one's *PARTY*, side with him (in public affairs);
>
> dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> CORRECTION: CUSHION (as GRUNTLE --> place in good humour) elements
>>
>> I think we have coded that semantical proposition "extend the neural
>> linguistic pragma by a formulation of #451 - PRAXIS as MALE / FEME
>> pairing applied to the priority ONTIC / DEME and final tally emphasis
>> GRUMBLE (#203, #247)@[4, 53] / GRUNTLE (#828, #450)@[45, 53] as
>> hypothetically the priority determination made of each"
>>
>> Its actually the EGO / SUPER elements which we have a concern for
>> whenever priority ONTIC / DEME selector occurs
>>
>> The metaphysical proposition is that FORESIGHT (meta descriptor dynamic
>> natural associator) is then a meta outcome (... 162) conforming to
>> #902 - RULE OF LAW against which probability of occurrence is applied ...
>>
>> Whilst the CUSHION (as GRUNTLE --> place in good humour) elements are an
>> abstraction which don't provide a coherent neural linguistic pragma
>> context we have nevertheless computed them for a future consideration
>>
>> Our next coding task will be enable the SPIRAL SELECTOR@{} to view the
>> FORESIGHT data objects.
>>
>> On 8/12/2023 12:27, dolf wrote:
>>> We have the actionable task {} module devised and our weekend activity
>>> will be to code the build function...
>>>
>>> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Foresight%20Pragma>
>>>
>>
>> build: function (strongs, telos, word, item) {
>>
>> var meme = Savvy.GNOSIS.getGrappleMemeObject(word);
>> var index = 0;
>>
>> doNode (this.GRUMBLE, meme, strongs, meme.telos, total (meme.telos));
>> meme = Savvy.GNOSIS.getGrappleMemeObject(meme.grumble.data);
>> doNode (this.GRUNTLE, meme, strongs, meme.telos, total (meme.telos));
>>
>> return;
>>
>> function doNode (sphere, meme, strongs, word, tally) {
>>
>> var demes = new Array (meme.tally).fill(false);
>> var final = false;
>>
>> for (var is in meme.vMeme) {
>> switch (true) {
>> case (meme.demes.DEME.male.includes(meme.vMeme[is].M)) :
>> case (meme.demes.DEME.feme.includes(meme.vMeme[is].M)) :
>> case (meme.demes.DEME.male.includes(meme.vMeme[is].F)) :
>> case (meme.demes.DEME.feme.includes(meme.vMeme[is].F)) :
>> case (meme.demes.ONTIC.male.includes(meme.vMeme[is].M)) :
>> case (meme.demes.ONTIC.feme.includes(meme.vMeme[is].M)) :
>> case (meme.demes.ONTIC.male.includes(meme.vMeme[is].F)) :
>> case (meme.demes.ONTIC.feme.includes(meme.vMeme[is].F)) :
>> demes[is] = true;
>> }
>> }
>>
>> while ((is = demes.indexOf(true)) != -1) {
>> node (sphere, meme.vMeme[is].S+meme.vMeme[is].E+902, strongs, word,
>> tally);
>> demes[is] = false;
>> final = true;
>> }
>>
>> if (final)
>> node (sphere,
>> meme.vMeme[meme.tally-1].S+meme.vMeme[meme.tally-1].E+902, strongs,
>> word, tally);
>>
>> }
>>
>> // other code
>>
>> }
>>
>>> Our next development of the GRUMBLE prototype as dataset reference
>>> objects will be to extend the neural lingustic pragma by a formulation
>>> of #451 - PRAXIS as MALE / FEME pairing applied to the priority ONTIC /
>>> DEME  and final tally emphasis GRUMBLE (#203, #247)@[4, 53] / GRUNTLE
>>> (#828, #450)@[45, 53] as hypothetically the priority determination made
>>> of each.
>>>
>>> #81 --> #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY = #532
>>> #81 --> #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY = #532
>>>
>>> #1064 = #532 + #532 as [#80, #100, #70, #10, #4, #800] = proeídō
>>> (G4275): {UMBRA: #1064 % #41 = #39} 1) to foresee;
>>>
>>> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?date:2023.12.7&time:08.30&heuristic>
>>>
>>> GRUMBLE (#203, #247)@[5, 5, 68, 63, 2, 15, 34, 32, 18, 65, 19, 1, 21, 2,
>>> 32, 11, 4, 53]
>>>
>>> GRUNTLE (#828, #450)@[5, 5, 10, 5, 78, 68, 60, 63, 62, 2, 77, 15, 30,
>>> 34, 62, 32, 80, 18, 64, 65, 2, 19, 3, 1, 24, 21, 26, 2, 58, 32, 69, 11,
>>> 73, 4, 45, 53]
>>>
>>> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Foresight%20Pragma>
>>>
>>> - dolf
>>>
>>
>
>
>

--

Check out our SAVVY module prototype that facilitates a movable / resizable
DIALOG and complex dropdown MENU interface deploying the third party d3
library.
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?heuristic>
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/Savvy.zip> (Download resources)

We ought to be commencing that task tomorrow ...

On 10/12/2023 12:30, dolf wrote:
> dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Just a further comment a file named G1005.json will contain the paired "EGO
>> / SUPER elements which we have a concern for whenever priority ONTIC / DEME
>> selector occurs" and such equates to EGO + SUPER + #902 - RULE OF LAW as a
>> +/- dynamic which is different to regarding the value #1005 as teleological
>> / noumenon redacted concept relative to FORESIGHT.
>
> We've already identified that the memeBrain #451 - praxis of rationality
> spectrum (#452 ... #532) as dynamic natural associator pairing presents
> matters of consideration and what I want to see is the nature of any
> relationship with the ONTIC / DEME grounding as FORESIGHT construct which
> we'll need to visualise as limits.
>
> So our next development action will be to view the example G1005.json file
> in tabular terms of MALE / FEME, ONTIC / DEME selector and STRONGS
> reference.
>
> We'll start that tomorrow and we may subsequently include the concept {}
> form in our spiral selector@{}
>
>>
>> We don't know what is the determinant for instance in this example the DEME
>> selector is #73 as a magnitude applied to #68 - DIMMING / #519 but we don't
>> know if it's possible to use another variant such as #27 - DUTY (minus #41)
>> and whether this can be balanced #63 - WATCH + #41 = #104 % #81 = #23
>>
>> DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #73 - COMPLETION (CH’ENG)
>>
>> {@2: Sup: 68 - DIMMING: MENG (#73 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED {%26}); Ego: 63 -
>> WATCH: SHIH (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY DOMAIN
>> {%42})}
>>
>> #68 --> #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY = #519
>> #63 --> #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY = #514
>>
>> #1033 = #519 + #514 as [#500, #100, #70, #50, #8, #300, #5] = phronéō
>> (G5426): {UMBRA: #1525 % #41 = #8} 1) to have understanding, be wise; 2) to
>> feel, to think; 2a) to have an opinion of one's self, think of one's self,
>> to be modest, *NOT* *LET* *ONE’S* *OPINION* (*THOUGH* *JUST*) *OF*
>> *HIMSELF* *EXCEED* *THE* *BOUNDS* *OF* *MODESTY*; 2b) to think or judge
>> what one's opinion is; 2c) to be of the same mind i.e. agreed together,
>> cherish the same views, be harmonious; 3) to direct one's mind to a thing,
>> to seek, to strive for; 3a) to seek one's interest or advantage; 3b) to be
>> of one's *PARTY*, side with him (in public affairs);
>>
>> dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>> CORRECTION: CUSHION (as GRUNTLE --> place in good humour) elements
>>>
>>> I think we have coded that semantical proposition "extend the neural
>>> linguistic pragma by a formulation of #451 - PRAXIS as MALE / FEME
>>> pairing applied to the priority ONTIC / DEME and final tally emphasis
>>> GRUMBLE (#203, #247)@[4, 53] / GRUNTLE (#828, #450)@[45, 53] as
>>> hypothetically the priority determination made of each"
>>>
>>> Its actually the EGO / SUPER elements which we have a concern for
>>> whenever priority ONTIC / DEME selector occurs
>>>
>>> The metaphysical proposition is that FORESIGHT (meta descriptor dynamic
>>> natural associator) is then a meta outcome (... 162) conforming to
>>> #902 - RULE OF LAW against which probability of occurrence is applied ...
>>>
>>> Whilst the CUSHION (as GRUNTLE --> place in good humour) elements are an
>>> abstraction which don't provide a coherent neural linguistic pragma
>>> context we have nevertheless computed them for a future consideration
>>>
>>> Our next coding task will be enable the SPIRAL SELECTOR@{} to view the
>>> FORESIGHT data objects.
>>>
>>> On 8/12/2023 12:27, dolf wrote:
>>>> We have the actionable task {} module devised and our weekend activity
>>>> will be to code the build function...
>>>>
>>>> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Foresight%20Pragma>
>>>>
>>>
>>> build: function (strongs, telos, word, item) {
>>>
>>> var meme = Savvy.GNOSIS.getGrappleMemeObject(word);
>>> var index = 0;
>>>
>>> doNode (this.GRUMBLE, meme, strongs, meme.telos, total (meme.telos));
>>> meme = Savvy.GNOSIS.getGrappleMemeObject(meme.grumble.data);
>>> doNode (this.GRUNTLE, meme, strongs, meme.telos, total (meme.telos));
>>>
>>> return;
>>>
>>> function doNode (sphere, meme, strongs, word, tally) {
>>>
>>> var demes = new Array (meme.tally).fill(false);
>>> var final = false;
>>>
>>> for (var is in meme.vMeme) {
>>> switch (true) {
>>> case (meme.demes.DEME.male.includes(meme.vMeme[is].M)) :
>>> case (meme.demes.DEME.feme.includes(meme.vMeme[is].M)) :
>>> case (meme.demes.DEME.male.includes(meme.vMeme[is].F)) :
>>> case (meme.demes.DEME.feme.includes(meme.vMeme[is].F)) :
>>> case (meme.demes.ONTIC.male.includes(meme.vMeme[is].M)) :
>>> case (meme.demes.ONTIC.feme.includes(meme.vMeme[is].M)) :
>>> case (meme.demes.ONTIC.male.includes(meme.vMeme[is].F)) :
>>> case (meme.demes.ONTIC.feme.includes(meme.vMeme[is].F)) :
>>> demes[is] = true;
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>> while ((is = demes.indexOf(true)) != -1) {
>>> node (sphere, meme.vMeme[is].S+meme.vMeme[is].E+902, strongs, word,
>>> tally);
>>> demes[is] = false;
>>> final = true;
>>> }
>>>
>>> if (final)
>>> node (sphere,
>>> meme.vMeme[meme.tally-1].S+meme.vMeme[meme.tally-1].E+902, strongs,
>>> word, tally);
>>>
>>> }
>>>
>>> // other code
>>>
>>> }
>>>
>>>> Our next development of the GRUMBLE prototype as dataset reference
>>>> objects will be to extend the neural lingustic pragma by a formulation
>>>> of #451 - PRAXIS as MALE / FEME pairing applied to the priority ONTIC /
>>>> DEME  and final tally emphasis GRUMBLE (#203, #247)@[4, 53] / GRUNTLE
>>>> (#828, #450)@[45, 53] as hypothetically the priority determination made
>>>> of each.
>>>>
>>>> #81 --> #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY = #532
>>>> #81 --> #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY = #532
>>>>
>>>> #1064 = #532 + #532 as [#80, #100, #70, #10, #4, #800] = proeídō
>>>> (G4275): {UMBRA: #1064 % #41 = #39} 1) to foresee;
>>>>
>>>> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?date:2023.12.7&time:08.30&heuristic>
>>>>
>>>> GRUMBLE (#203, #247)@[5, 5, 68, 63, 2, 15, 34, 32, 18, 65, 19, 1, 21, 2,
>>>> 32, 11, 4, 53]
>>>>
>>>> GRUNTLE (#828, #450)@[5, 5, 10, 5, 78, 68, 60, 63, 62, 2, 77, 15, 30,
>>>> 34, 62, 32, 80, 18, 64, 65, 2, 19, 3, 1, 24, 21, 26, 2, 58, 32, 69, 11,
>>>> 73, 4, 45, 53]
>>>>
>>>> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Foresight%20Pragma>
>>>>
>>>> - dolf
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>

--
Check out our SAVVY module prototype that facilitates a movable /
resizable DIALOG and complex dropdown MENU interface deploying the third
party d3 library.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?heuristic>

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/Savvy.zip> (Download resources)

I've thought more about the normalisation of our ONTIC and noumenon
redacted foresight datasets and have decided to forestall this until we
prototype develop our problematic class {} function.

Our first action will be to define conceptual scenarios and corresponding
vEvents to determine the metalogic intersections for viable action.

And we shall implement it as an actionable...

dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
> We ought to be commencing that task tomorrow ...
>
> On 10/12/2023 12:30, dolf wrote:
>> dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>> Just a further comment a file named G1005.json will contain the paired "EGO
>>> / SUPER elements which we have a concern for whenever priority ONTIC / DEME
>>> selector occurs" and such equates to EGO + SUPER + #902 - RULE OF LAW as a
>>> +/- dynamic which is different to regarding the value #1005 as teleological
>>> / noumenon redacted concept relative to FORESIGHT.
>>
>> We've already identified that the memeBrain #451 - praxis of rationality
>> spectrum (#452 ... #532) as dynamic natural associator pairing presents
>> matters of consideration and what I want to see is the nature of any
>> relationship with the ONTIC / DEME grounding as FORESIGHT construct which
>> we'll need to visualise as limits.
>>
>> So our next development action will be to view the example G1005.json file
>> in tabular terms of MALE / FEME, ONTIC / DEME selector and STRONGS
>> reference.
>>
>> We'll start that tomorrow and we may subsequently include the concept {}
>> form in our spiral selector@{}
>>
>>>
>>> We don't know what is the determinant for instance in this example the DEME
>>> selector is #73 as a magnitude applied to #68 - DIMMING / #519 but we don't
>>> know if it's possible to use another variant such as #27 - DUTY (minus #41)
>>> and whether this can be balanced #63 - WATCH + #41 = #104 % #81 = #23
>>>
>>> DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #73 - COMPLETION (CH’ENG)
>>>
>>> {@2: Sup: 68 - DIMMING: MENG (#73 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED {%26}); Ego: 63 -
>>> WATCH: SHIH (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY DOMAIN
>>> {%42})}
>>>
>>> #68 --> #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY = #519
>>> #63 --> #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY = #514
>>>
>>> #1033 = #519 + #514 as [#500, #100, #70, #50, #8, #300, #5] = phronéō
>>> (G5426): {UMBRA: #1525 % #41 = #8} 1) to have understanding, be wise; 2) to
>>> feel, to think; 2a) to have an opinion of one's self, think of one's self,
>>> to be modest, *NOT* *LET* *ONE’S* *OPINION* (*THOUGH* *JUST*) *OF*
>>> *HIMSELF* *EXCEED* *THE* *BOUNDS* *OF* *MODESTY*; 2b) to think or judge
>>> what one's opinion is; 2c) to be of the same mind i.e. agreed together,
>>> cherish the same views, be harmonious; 3) to direct one's mind to a thing,
>>> to seek, to strive for; 3a) to seek one's interest or advantage; 3b) to be
>>> of one's *PARTY*, side with him (in public affairs);
>>>
>>> dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>> CORRECTION: CUSHION (as GRUNTLE --> place in good humour) elements
>>>>
>>>> I think we have coded that semantical proposition "extend the neural
>>>> linguistic pragma by a formulation of #451 - PRAXIS as MALE / FEME
>>>> pairing applied to the priority ONTIC / DEME and final tally emphasis
>>>> GRUMBLE (#203, #247)@[4, 53] / GRUNTLE (#828, #450)@[45, 53] as
>>>> hypothetically the priority determination made of each"
>>>>
>>>> Its actually the EGO / SUPER elements which we have a concern for
>>>> whenever priority ONTIC / DEME selector occurs
>>>>
>>>> The metaphysical proposition is that FORESIGHT (meta descriptor dynamic
>>>> natural associator) is then a meta outcome (... 162) conforming to
>>>> #902 - RULE OF LAW against which probability of occurrence is applied ...
>>>>
>>>> Whilst the CUSHION (as GRUNTLE --> place in good humour) elements are an
>>>> abstraction which don't provide a coherent neural linguistic pragma
>>>> context we have nevertheless computed them for a future consideration
>>>>
>>>> Our next coding task will be enable the SPIRAL SELECTOR@{} to view the
>>>> FORESIGHT data objects.
>>>>
>>>> On 8/12/2023 12:27, dolf wrote:
>>>>> We have the actionable task {} module devised and our weekend activity
>>>>> will be to code the build function...
>>>>>
>>>>> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Foresight%20Pragma>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> build: function (strongs, telos, word, item) {
>>>>
>>>> var meme = Savvy.GNOSIS.getGrappleMemeObject(word);
>>>> var index = 0;
>>>>
>>>> doNode (this.GRUMBLE, meme, strongs, meme.telos, total (meme.telos));
>>>> meme = Savvy.GNOSIS.getGrappleMemeObject(meme.grumble.data);
>>>> doNode (this.GRUNTLE, meme, strongs, meme.telos, total (meme.telos));
>>>>
>>>> return;
>>>>
>>>> function doNode (sphere, meme, strongs, word, tally) {
>>>>
>>>> var demes = new Array (meme.tally).fill(false);
>>>> var final = false;
>>>>
>>>> for (var is in meme.vMeme) {
>>>> switch (true) {
>>>> case (meme.demes.DEME.male.includes(meme.vMeme[is].M)) :
>>>> case (meme.demes.DEME.feme.includes(meme.vMeme[is].M)) :
>>>> case (meme.demes.DEME.male.includes(meme.vMeme[is].F)) :
>>>> case (meme.demes.DEME.feme.includes(meme.vMeme[is].F)) :
>>>> case (meme.demes.ONTIC.male.includes(meme.vMeme[is].M)) :
>>>> case (meme.demes.ONTIC.feme.includes(meme.vMeme[is].M)) :
>>>> case (meme.demes.ONTIC.male.includes(meme.vMeme[is].F)) :
>>>> case (meme.demes.ONTIC.feme.includes(meme.vMeme[is].F)) :
>>>> demes[is] = true;
>>>> }
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> while ((is = demes.indexOf(true)) != -1) {
>>>> node (sphere, meme.vMeme[is].S+meme.vMeme[is].E+902, strongs, word,
>>>> tally);
>>>> demes[is] = false;
>>>> final = true;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> if (final)
>>>> node (sphere,
>>>> meme.vMeme[meme.tally-1].S+meme.vMeme[meme.tally-1].E+902, strongs,
>>>> word, tally);
>>>>
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> // other code
>>>>
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>>> Our next development of the GRUMBLE prototype as dataset reference
>>>>> objects will be to extend the neural lingustic pragma by a formulation
>>>>> of #451 - PRAXIS as MALE / FEME pairing applied to the priority ONTIC /
>>>>> DEME  and final tally emphasis GRUMBLE (#203, #247)@[4, 53] / GRUNTLE
>>>>> (#828, #450)@[45, 53] as hypothetically the priority determination made
>>>>> of each.
>>>>>
>>>>> #81 --> #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY = #532
>>>>> #81 --> #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY = #532
>>>>>
>>>>> #1064 = #532 + #532 as [#80, #100, #70, #10, #4, #800] = proeídō
>>>>> (G4275): {UMBRA: #1064 % #41 = #39} 1) to foresee;
>>>>>
>>>>> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?date:2023.12.7&time:08.30&heuristic>
>>>>>
>>>>> GRUMBLE (#203, #247)@[5, 5, 68, 63, 2, 15, 34, 32, 18, 65, 19, 1, 21, 2,
>>>>> 32, 11, 4, 53]
>>>>>
>>>>> GRUNTLE (#828, #450)@[5, 5, 10, 5, 78, 68, 60, 63, 62, 2, 77, 15, 30,
>>>>> 34, 62, 32, 80, 18, 64, 65, 2, 19, 3, 1, 24, 21, 26, 2, 58, 32, 69, 11,
>>>>> 73, 4, 45, 53]
>>>>>
>>>>> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Foresight%20Pragma>
>>>>>
>>>>> - dolf
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>

--

Check out our SAVVY module prototype that facilitates a movable / resizable
DIALOG and complex dropdown MENU interface deploying the third party d3
library.
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?heuristic>
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/Savvy.zip> (Download resources)

On 20/12/2023 15:32, dolf wrote:
> I've thought more about the normalisation of our ONTIC and noumenon
> redacted foresight datasets and have decided to forestall this until we
> prototype develop our problematic class {} function.
>
> Our first action will be to define conceptual scenarios and corresponding
> vEvents to determine the metalogic intersections for viable action.
>
> And we shall implement it as an actionable task...
>

So our first step will be to enable the actionable task to run with a
parameter to arbitrarily enable initialisation to then optionally retain
the static state of the Problematic Solver each time the actionable task
is run ...

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Problematic&initialise>

> dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> We ought to be commencing that task tomorrow ...
>>
>> On 10/12/2023 12:30, dolf wrote:
>>> dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Just a further comment a file named G1005.json will contain the paired "EGO
>>>> / SUPER elements which we have a concern for whenever priority ONTIC / DEME
>>>> selector occurs" and such equates to EGO + SUPER + #902 - RULE OF LAW as a
>>>> +/- dynamic which is different to regarding the value #1005 as teleological
>>>> / noumenon redacted concept relative to FORESIGHT.
>>>
>>> We've already identified that the memeBrain #451 - praxis of rationality
>>> spectrum (#452 ... #532) as dynamic natural associator pairing presents
>>> matters of consideration and what I want to see is the nature of any
>>> relationship with the ONTIC / DEME grounding as FORESIGHT construct which
>>> we'll need to visualise as limits.
>>>
>>> So our next development action will be to view the example G1005.json file
>>> in tabular terms of MALE / FEME, ONTIC / DEME selector and STRONGS
>>> reference.
>>>
>>> We'll start that tomorrow and we may subsequently include the concept {}
>>> form in our spiral selector@{}
>>>
>>>>
>>>> We don't know what is the determinant for instance in this example the DEME
>>>> selector is #73 as a magnitude applied to #68 - DIMMING / #519 but we don't
>>>> know if it's possible to use another variant such as #27 - DUTY (minus #41)
>>>> and whether this can be balanced #63 - WATCH + #41 = #104 % #81 = #23
>>>>
>>>> DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #73 - COMPLETION (CH’ENG)
>>>>
>>>> {@2: Sup: 68 - DIMMING: MENG (#73 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED {%26}); Ego: 63 -
>>>> WATCH: SHIH (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY DOMAIN
>>>> {%42})}
>>>>
>>>> #68 --> #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY = #519
>>>> #63 --> #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY = #514
>>>>
>>>> #1033 = #519 + #514 as [#500, #100, #70, #50, #8, #300, #5] = phronéō
>>>> (G5426): {UMBRA: #1525 % #41 = #8} 1) to have understanding, be wise; 2) to
>>>> feel, to think; 2a) to have an opinion of one's self, think of one's self,
>>>> to be modest, *NOT* *LET* *ONE’S* *OPINION* (*THOUGH* *JUST*) *OF*
>>>> *HIMSELF* *EXCEED* *THE* *BOUNDS* *OF* *MODESTY*; 2b) to think or judge
>>>> what one's opinion is; 2c) to be of the same mind i.e. agreed together,
>>>> cherish the same views, be harmonious; 3) to direct one's mind to a thing,
>>>> to seek, to strive for; 3a) to seek one's interest or advantage; 3b) to be
>>>> of one's *PARTY*, side with him (in public affairs);
>>>>
>>>> dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> CORRECTION: CUSHION (as GRUNTLE --> place in good humour) elements
>>>>>
>>>>> I think we have coded that semantical proposition "extend the neural
>>>>> linguistic pragma by a formulation of #451 - PRAXIS as MALE / FEME
>>>>> pairing applied to the priority ONTIC / DEME and final tally emphasis
>>>>> GRUMBLE (#203, #247)@[4, 53] / GRUNTLE (#828, #450)@[45, 53] as
>>>>> hypothetically the priority determination made of each"
>>>>>
>>>>> Its actually the EGO / SUPER elements which we have a concern for
>>>>> whenever priority ONTIC / DEME selector occurs
>>>>>
>>>>> The metaphysical proposition is that FORESIGHT (meta descriptor dynamic
>>>>> natural associator) is then a meta outcome (... 162) conforming to
>>>>> #902 - RULE OF LAW against which probability of occurrence is applied ...
>>>>>
>>>>> Whilst the CUSHION (as GRUNTLE --> place in good humour) elements are an
>>>>> abstraction which don't provide a coherent neural linguistic pragma
>>>>> context we have nevertheless computed them for a future consideration
>>>>>
>>>>> Our next coding task will be enable the SPIRAL SELECTOR@{} to view the
>>>>> FORESIGHT data objects.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 8/12/2023 12:27, dolf wrote:
>>>>>> We have the actionable task {} module devised and our weekend activity
>>>>>> will be to code the build function...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Foresight%20Pragma>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> build: function (strongs, telos, word, item) {
>>>>>
>>>>> var meme = Savvy.GNOSIS.getGrappleMemeObject(word);
>>>>> var index = 0;
>>>>>
>>>>> doNode (this.GRUMBLE, meme, strongs, meme.telos, total (meme.telos));
>>>>> meme = Savvy.GNOSIS.getGrappleMemeObject(meme.grumble.data);
>>>>> doNode (this.GRUNTLE, meme, strongs, meme.telos, total (meme.telos));
>>>>>
>>>>> return;
>>>>>
>>>>> function doNode (sphere, meme, strongs, word, tally) {
>>>>>
>>>>> var demes = new Array (meme.tally).fill(false);
>>>>> var final = false;
>>>>>
>>>>> for (var is in meme.vMeme) {
>>>>> switch (true) {
>>>>> case (meme.demes.DEME.male.includes(meme.vMeme[is].M)) :
>>>>> case (meme.demes.DEME.feme.includes(meme.vMeme[is].M)) :
>>>>> case (meme.demes.DEME.male.includes(meme.vMeme[is].F)) :
>>>>> case (meme.demes.DEME.feme.includes(meme.vMeme[is].F)) :
>>>>> case (meme.demes.ONTIC.male.includes(meme.vMeme[is].M)) :
>>>>> case (meme.demes.ONTIC.feme.includes(meme.vMeme[is].M)) :
>>>>> case (meme.demes.ONTIC.male.includes(meme.vMeme[is].F)) :
>>>>> case (meme.demes.ONTIC.feme.includes(meme.vMeme[is].F)) :
>>>>> demes[is] = true;
>>>>> }
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> while ((is = demes.indexOf(true)) != -1) {
>>>>> node (sphere, meme.vMeme[is].S+meme.vMeme[is].E+902, strongs, word,
>>>>> tally);
>>>>> demes[is] = false;
>>>>> final = true;
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> if (final)
>>>>> node (sphere,
>>>>> meme.vMeme[meme.tally-1].S+meme.vMeme[meme.tally-1].E+902, strongs,
>>>>> word, tally);
>>>>>
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> // other code
>>>>>
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>>> Our next development of the GRUMBLE prototype as dataset reference
>>>>>> objects will be to extend the neural lingustic pragma by a formulation
>>>>>> of #451 - PRAXIS as MALE / FEME pairing applied to the priority ONTIC /
>>>>>> DEME  and final tally emphasis GRUMBLE (#203, #247)@[4, 53] / GRUNTLE
>>>>>> (#828, #450)@[45, 53] as hypothetically the priority determination made
>>>>>> of each.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> #81 --> #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY = #532
>>>>>> #81 --> #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY = #532
>>>>>>
>>>>>> #1064 = #532 + #532 as [#80, #100, #70, #10, #4, #800] = proeídō
>>>>>> (G4275): {UMBRA: #1064 % #41 = #39} 1) to foresee;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?date:2023.12.7&time:08.30&heuristic>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> GRUMBLE (#203, #247)@[5, 5, 68, 63, 2, 15, 34, 32, 18, 65, 19, 1, 21, 2,
>>>>>> 32, 11, 4, 53]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> GRUNTLE (#828, #450)@[5, 5, 10, 5, 78, 68, 60, 63, 62, 2, 77, 15, 30,
>>>>>> 34, 62, 32, 80, 18, 64, 65, 2, 19, 3, 1, 24, 21, 26, 2, 58, 32, 69, 11,
>>>>>> 73, 4, 45, 53]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Foresight%20Pragma>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - dolf
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>