Xeno wrote:
> On 25/1/2024 8:27 am, alvey wrote:
>> Noddy wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> It's his bi-polar hard at work. He's legitimately mental.
>>
>> Hahahahaha!
>>
>> Wow! *Three* stupidities in one line!
>>
>> 1. Amongst other disciplines, you are not qualified to assess mental
>> health. As far from it as Bumhole (Vic) is from picturesque in fact.
>>
>> 2. You have referenced the disorder in a hopelessly inappropriate way.
>>
>> 3. You can't even spell it!
>>
>>
>> Always good for a laugh is the old Fraudster.
>>
>>
>> alvey
>>
>>
> His last sentence is a real kicker. Tries to use big words in a
> sentence, pity he has no clue as to their meaning. Take his use of
> "legitimately" as a prime example. So "legitimately mental" means it's
> *legal/permissable* to be bipolar? I'm sure all those *diagnosed* with
> bipolar disorder will be happy to know they won't be immediately
> incarcerated!

LOL!

>
> Darren, the laugh a minute gift that keeps on giving!
>

yes indeed. in common with keefy, in his desperate efforts to puff
himself up and blow others away, all he manages to achieve is to show
what a fool he is

--
Have a nice day!..

On 24/01/2024 2:28 pm, Xeno wrote:
> On 24/1/2024 4:46 pm, Keithr0 wrote:
>> On 23/01/2024 8:42 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>> Keithr0 wrote:
>>>> On 23/01/2024 4:39 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>>>> Keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>> On 23/01/2024 10:35 am, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>>>>>> alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>> Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>>>>>>>> alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On the news tonight it was reported that the Ford Ranger is
>>>>>>>>>>> now Australia's top selling car. So does that mean..
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> (a) Most Australians are bogans
>>>>>>>>>>> (b) Most Australian are idiots
>>>>>>>>>>> (c) Most Australians have more money than sense
>>>>>>>>>>> (d) All of the above
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> In a nasally monotone, Cyril Pedant of the Sunshine Coast
>>>>>>>>>> points out,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> None of (a), (b) and (c) are correct. The "top selling car"
>>>>>>>>>> does not equate to "most".
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Should have read something like...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> This means that the buyers of Oz's top selling vehicle, (I
>>>>>>>>>> can't bring myself to call the hideous behemoths 'cars'), are;
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> a) Bogans
>>>>>>>>>> b) Idiots
>>>>>>>>>> c) Have more money than sense
>>>>>>>>>> d) Are men with serious insecurity issues
>>>>>>>>>> e) Are crap drivers(1)
>>>>>>>>>> f) All of the above
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> actually no. the correct phraseology is .. "most Australian car
>>>>>>>>> buyers are ".  based on the premise that Ford Ranger drivers
>>>>>>>>> are (a) to (f)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Still 'No'. Unless the Ford monstrosities accounted for over 50%
>>>>>>>> of sales then "most Australian car buyers" did *not* buy the
>>>>>>>> fugly blots on the landscape.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mercedes, BMW, and Lexus all seem to be in competition to make a
>>>>>> car fuglier than the average ute.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> it sold more than any other make so most car buyers bought it.
>>>>>>> consider for example
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bullshit.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 45% of tv buyers bought a Samsung tv
>>>>>>> 30% bought LG
>>>>>>> 25% bought Hisense
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> therefore most TV buyers bought a Samsung TV
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Are you sure that English is not your second language?
>>>>>
>>>>> yes
>>>>>
>>>>>> "Most people" implies a majority of people, and on the maths that
>>>>>> I was taught 45% is not a majority. All that you can say from your
>>>>>> example is that more people bought Samsung than either of the
>>>>>> other two.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> yes, so of all the ppl who bought a TV, most bought a Samsung. so
>>>>> easy to just say most bought a Samsung. likewise of all those who
>>>>> bought a car, most bought a Ranger.
>>>>>
>>>> God, you're thick, a majority of people did not buy a Samsung, only
>>>> a minority did, therefor most people did NOT buy a Samsung.
>>>
>>> so by your reasoning.. a minority (of purchasers) bought a Samsung.
>>> and a minority bought an LG. and a minority bought a Hisense. so
>>> there was no majority of purchasers? but how can that be. UNLESS you
>>> say the majority bought a Samsung, which they did. so most purchasers
>>> bought a Samsung. or if you want to be entirely correct you would
>>> say.. "when buying a TV more purchasers buy a Samsung than any other
>>> brand". but in general conversation one would just say "the brand
>>> most ppl buy is Samsung". or simply "most ppl buy Samsung".
>>>
>>>>
>>>> If you can't understand that then I'm sorry, but I'm not here to
>>>> teach English, maths and elementary logic.
>>>
>>> If you can't understand that then I'm sorry for you, but I'm happy to
>>> try to teach you English, maths and elementary logic
>>>
>>> but this may help..
>>>
>>> majority
>>>
>>> noun
>>> 1. the greater number.
>>> (snip)
>>>
>>>
>>> OTY
>>>
>>>
>> The iPhone is the most popular phone, but most people (i.e. the
>> majority of people) own an Android phone. Clear enough?
>>
>> Over an out.
>
> Now you're getting deceitful.
>
> The iPhone is a brand of phone (Apple)
> Android is a phone OS
>
> comparing apples to oranges (pun intended)
>

Sliemey is living up to his name.

--
In thread "May need to buy petrol soon" Sept 23 2021 11:15:59am
Keithr0 wrote: "He made the assertion either he proves it or he is a
proven liar."

On Sept 23 2021 3:16:29pm Keithr0 wrote:
"He asserts that the claim is true, so, if it is unproven, he is lying."

On 25/01/2024 7:56 am, Mighty Mouse wrote:
> Xeno wrote:
>> On 24/1/2024 4:46 pm, Keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 23/01/2024 8:42 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>>> Keithr0 wrote:
>>>>> On 23/01/2024 4:39 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>>>>> Keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>> On 23/01/2024 10:35 am, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>>>>>>> alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On the news tonight it was reported that the Ford Ranger is
>>>>>>>>>>>> now Australia's top selling car. So does that mean..
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> (a) Most Australians are bogans
>>>>>>>>>>>> (b) Most Australian are idiots
>>>>>>>>>>>> (c) Most Australians have more money than sense
>>>>>>>>>>>> (d) All of the above
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> In a nasally monotone, Cyril Pedant of the Sunshine Coast
>>>>>>>>>>> points out,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> None of (a), (b) and (c) are correct. The "top selling car"
>>>>>>>>>>> does not equate to "most".
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Should have read something like...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> This means that the buyers of Oz's top selling vehicle, (I
>>>>>>>>>>> can't bring myself to call the hideous behemoths 'cars'), are;
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> a) Bogans
>>>>>>>>>>> b) Idiots
>>>>>>>>>>> c) Have more money than sense
>>>>>>>>>>> d) Are men with serious insecurity issues
>>>>>>>>>>> e) Are crap drivers(1)
>>>>>>>>>>> f) All of the above
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> actually no. the correct phraseology is .. "most Australian
>>>>>>>>>> car buyers are ".  based on the premise that Ford Ranger
>>>>>>>>>> drivers are (a) to (f)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Still 'No'. Unless the Ford monstrosities accounted for over
>>>>>>>>> 50% of sales then "most Australian car buyers" did *not* buy
>>>>>>>>> the fugly blots on the landscape.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Mercedes, BMW, and Lexus all seem to be in competition to make a
>>>>>>> car fuglier than the average ute.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> it sold more than any other make so most car buyers bought it.
>>>>>>>> consider for example
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Bullshit.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 45% of tv buyers bought a Samsung tv
>>>>>>>> 30% bought LG
>>>>>>>> 25% bought Hisense
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> therefore most TV buyers bought a Samsung TV
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Are you sure that English is not your second language?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> yes
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Most people" implies a majority of people, and on the maths that
>>>>>>> I was taught 45% is not a majority. All that you can say from
>>>>>>> your example is that more people bought Samsung than either of
>>>>>>> the other two.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> yes, so of all the ppl who bought a TV, most bought a Samsung. so
>>>>>> easy to just say most bought a Samsung. likewise of all those who
>>>>>> bought a car, most bought a Ranger.
>>>>>>
>>>>> God, you're thick, a majority of people did not buy a Samsung, only
>>>>> a minority did, therefor most people did NOT buy a Samsung.
>>>>
>>>> so by your reasoning.. a minority (of purchasers) bought a Samsung.
>>>> and a minority bought an LG. and a minority bought a Hisense. so
>>>> there was no majority of purchasers? but how can that be. UNLESS you
>>>> say the majority bought a Samsung, which they did. so most
>>>> purchasers bought a Samsung. or if you want to be entirely correct
>>>> you would say.. "when buying a TV more purchasers buy a Samsung than
>>>> any other brand". but in general conversation one would just say
>>>> "the brand most ppl buy is Samsung". or simply "most ppl buy Samsung".
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> If you can't understand that then I'm sorry, but I'm not here to
>>>>> teach English, maths and elementary logic.
>>>>
>>>> If you can't understand that then I'm sorry for you, but I'm happy
>>>> to try to teach you English, maths and elementary logic
>>>>
>>>> but this may help..
>>>>
>>>> majority
>>>>
>>>> noun
>>>> 1. the greater number.
>>>> (snip)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> OTY
>>>>
>>>>
>>> The iPhone is the most popular phone, but most people (i.e. the
>>> majority of people) own an Android phone. Clear enough?
>>>
>>> Over an out.
>>
>> Now you're getting deceitful.
>>
>> The iPhone is a brand of phone (Apple)
>> Android is a phone OS
>>
>> comparing apples to oranges (pun intended)
>>
>
> exactly. irrelevant, inappropriate, and false analogy
>

....and the mischievous illogical slimeball claims he was a programmer!

--
In thread "May need to buy petrol soon" Sept 23 2021 11:15:59am
Keithr0 wrote: "He made the assertion either he proves it or he is a
proven liar."

On Sept 23 2021 3:16:29pm Keithr0 wrote:
"He asserts that the claim is true, so, if it is unproven, he is lying."

On 25/01/2024 10:04 am, Mighty Mouse wrote:
> Xeno wrote:
>> On 25/1/2024 8:27 am, alvey wrote:
>>> Noddy wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> It's his bi-polar hard at work. He's legitimately mental.
>>>
>>> Hahahahaha!
>>>
>>> Wow! *Three* stupidities in one line!
>>>
>>> 1. Amongst other disciplines, you are not qualified to assess mental
>>> health. As far from it as Bumhole (Vic) is from picturesque in fact.
>>>
>>> 2. You have referenced the disorder in a hopelessly inappropriate way.
>>>
>>> 3. You can't even spell it!
>>>
>>>
>>> Always good for a laugh is the old Fraudster.
>>>
>>>
>>> alvey
>>>
>>>
>> His last sentence is a real kicker. Tries to use big words in a
>> sentence, pity he has no clue as to their meaning. Take his use of
>> "legitimately" as a prime example. So "legitimately mental" means it's
>> *legal/permissable* to be bipolar? I'm sure all those *diagnosed* with
>> bipolar disorder will be happy to know they won't be immediately
>> incarcerated!
>
> LOL!
>
>>
>> Darren, the laugh a minute gift that keeps on giving!
>>
>
> yes indeed. in common with keefy, in his desperate efforts to puff
> himself up and blow others away, all he manages to achieve is to show
> what a fool he is
>
Who's your dealer, he must sell the really good shit.

Keithr0 wrote:
> On 23/01/2024 8:39 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>> Noddy wrote:
>>> On 23/01/2024 4:51 pm, Keithr0 wrote:
>>>> On 23/01/2024 10:35 am, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> Still 'No'. Unless the Ford monstrosities accounted for over 50%
>>>>>> of sales then "most Australian car buyers" did *not* buy the
>>>>>> fugly blots on the landscape.
>>>>
>>>> Mercedes, BMW, and Lexus all seem to be in competition to make a
>>>> car fuglier than the average ute.
>>>
>>> And they're all very successful at that.
>>>
>>>>> it sold more than any other make so most car buyers bought it.
>>>>> consider for example
>>>>
>>>> Bullshit.
>>>
>>> It was the single best selling individual model, but it was *not*
>>> the best selling make. Toyota always wins that contest simply by way
>>> of Toyota having more models on the market than anyone else.
>>>
>>>>> 45% of tv buyers bought a Samsung tv
>>>>> 30% bought LG
>>>>> 25% bought Hisense
>>>>>
>>>>> therefore most TV buyers bought a Samsung TV
>>>>
>>>> Are you sure that English is not your second language? "Most
>>>> people" implies a majority of people, and on the maths that I was
>>>> taught 45% is not a majority. All that you can say from your
>>>> example is that more people bought Samsung than either of the other
>>>> two.
>>>
>>> Indeed. In his example, 55%, or "most people" bought something
>>> *other* than a Samsung TV.
>>>
>>> I don't know why you bother with this lunatic,
>>
>> shutup dingbat. you couldn't even pass year nine
>>
>>> as he has clearly demonstrated his idiocy enough now that if Helen
>>> Keller were still alive even she could see it.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> i run rings around you in any debate, which is why you hide from me
>> in coward castle
>>
>>
> Who's your dealer, he must sell the really good shit.

prove me wrong. however, it's impossible to have a rational
debate/discussion with him because of his dishonesty, ie. he lies!
latest example (the last discussion I had with him) he tried to convince
everyone that he saw me drive past his house. he hides from me, as he
does from anyone who tells him the truth about himself, or who he can't
browbeat into submission to him. that's why he has the intelligent ppl
here blocked (Xeno, Clocky, alvey, me)

--
Have a nice day!..

Clocky wrote:
> On 24/01/2024 2:28 pm, Xeno wrote:
>> On 24/1/2024 4:46 pm, Keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 23/01/2024 8:42 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>>> Keithr0 wrote:
>>>>> On 23/01/2024 4:39 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>>>>> Keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>> On 23/01/2024 10:35 am, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>>>>>>> alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On the news tonight it was reported that the Ford Ranger is
>>>>>>>>>>>> now Australia's top selling car. So does that mean..
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> (a) Most Australians are bogans
>>>>>>>>>>>> (b) Most Australian are idiots
>>>>>>>>>>>> (c) Most Australians have more money than sense
>>>>>>>>>>>> (d) All of the above
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> In a nasally monotone, Cyril Pedant of the Sunshine Coast
>>>>>>>>>>> points out,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> None of (a), (b) and (c) are correct. The "top selling car"
>>>>>>>>>>> does not equate to "most".
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Should have read something like...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> This means that the buyers of Oz's top selling vehicle, (I
>>>>>>>>>>> can't bring myself to call the hideous behemoths 'cars'), are;
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> a) Bogans
>>>>>>>>>>> b) Idiots
>>>>>>>>>>> c) Have more money than sense
>>>>>>>>>>> d) Are men with serious insecurity issues
>>>>>>>>>>> e) Are crap drivers(1)
>>>>>>>>>>> f) All of the above
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> actually no. the correct phraseology is .. "most Australian
>>>>>>>>>> car buyers are ".  based on the premise that Ford Ranger
>>>>>>>>>> drivers are (a) to (f)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Still 'No'. Unless the Ford monstrosities accounted for over
>>>>>>>>> 50% of sales then "most Australian car buyers" did *not* buy
>>>>>>>>> the fugly blots on the landscape.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Mercedes, BMW, and Lexus all seem to be in competition to make a
>>>>>>> car fuglier than the average ute.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> it sold more than any other make so most car buyers bought it.
>>>>>>>> consider for example
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Bullshit.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 45% of tv buyers bought a Samsung tv
>>>>>>>> 30% bought LG
>>>>>>>> 25% bought Hisense
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> therefore most TV buyers bought a Samsung TV
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Are you sure that English is not your second language?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> yes
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Most people" implies a majority of people, and on the maths
>>>>>>> that I was taught 45% is not a majority. All that you can say
>>>>>>> from your example is that more people bought Samsung than either
>>>>>>> of the other two.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> yes, so of all the ppl who bought a TV, most bought a Samsung. so
>>>>>> easy to just say most bought a Samsung. likewise of all those who
>>>>>> bought a car, most bought a Ranger.
>>>>>>
>>>>> God, you're thick, a majority of people did not buy a Samsung,
>>>>> only a minority did, therefor most people did NOT buy a Samsung.
>>>>
>>>> so by your reasoning.. a minority (of purchasers) bought a Samsung.
>>>> and a minority bought an LG. and a minority bought a Hisense. so
>>>> there was no majority of purchasers? but how can that be. UNLESS
>>>> you say the majority bought a Samsung, which they did. so most
>>>> purchasers bought a Samsung. or if you want to be entirely correct
>>>> you would say.. "when buying a TV more purchasers buy a Samsung
>>>> than any other brand". but in general conversation one would just
>>>> say "the brand most ppl buy is Samsung". or simply "most ppl buy
>>>> Samsung".
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> If you can't understand that then I'm sorry, but I'm not here to
>>>>> teach English, maths and elementary logic.
>>>>
>>>> If you can't understand that then I'm sorry for you, but I'm happy
>>>> to try to teach you English, maths and elementary logic
>>>>
>>>> but this may help..
>>>>
>>>> majority
>>>>
>>>> noun
>>>> 1. the greater number.
>>>> (snip)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> OTY
>>>>
>>>>
>>> The iPhone is the most popular phone, but most people (i.e. the
>>> majority of people) own an Android phone. Clear enough?
>>>
>>> Over an out.
>>
>> Now you're getting deceitful.
>>
>> The iPhone is a brand of phone (Apple)
>> Android is a phone OS
>>
>> comparing apples to oranges (pun intended)
>>
>
>
> Sliemey is living up to his name.
>

could we ever expect otherwise

--
Have a nice day!..

Clocky wrote:
> On 25/01/2024 7:56 am, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>> Xeno wrote:
>>> On 24/1/2024 4:46 pm, Keithr0 wrote:
>>>> On 23/01/2024 8:42 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>>>> Keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>> On 23/01/2024 4:39 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>>>>>> Keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 23/01/2024 10:35 am, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>>>>>>>> alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On the news tonight it was reported that the Ford Ranger
>>>>>>>>>>>>> is now Australia's top selling car. So does that mean..
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (a) Most Australians are bogans
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (b) Most Australian are idiots
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (c) Most Australians have more money than sense
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (d) All of the above
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> In a nasally monotone, Cyril Pedant of the Sunshine Coast
>>>>>>>>>>>> points out,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> None of (a), (b) and (c) are correct. The "top selling car"
>>>>>>>>>>>> does not equate to "most".
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Should have read something like...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> This means that the buyers of Oz's top selling vehicle, (I
>>>>>>>>>>>> can't bring myself to call the hideous behemoths 'cars'), are;
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> a) Bogans
>>>>>>>>>>>> b) Idiots
>>>>>>>>>>>> c) Have more money than sense
>>>>>>>>>>>> d) Are men with serious insecurity issues
>>>>>>>>>>>> e) Are crap drivers(1)
>>>>>>>>>>>> f) All of the above
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> actually no. the correct phraseology is .. "most Australian
>>>>>>>>>>> car buyers are ".  based on the premise that Ford Ranger
>>>>>>>>>>> drivers are (a) to (f)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Still 'No'. Unless the Ford monstrosities accounted for over
>>>>>>>>>> 50% of sales then "most Australian car buyers" did *not* buy
>>>>>>>>>> the fugly blots on the landscape.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Mercedes, BMW, and Lexus all seem to be in competition to make
>>>>>>>> a car fuglier than the average ute.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> it sold more than any other make so most car buyers bought it.
>>>>>>>>> consider for example
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Bullshit.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 45% of tv buyers bought a Samsung tv
>>>>>>>>> 30% bought LG
>>>>>>>>> 25% bought Hisense
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> therefore most TV buyers bought a Samsung TV
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Are you sure that English is not your second language?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> yes
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Most people" implies a majority of people, and on the maths
>>>>>>>> that I was taught 45% is not a majority. All that you can say
>>>>>>>> from your example is that more people bought Samsung than
>>>>>>>> either of the other two.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> yes, so of all the ppl who bought a TV, most bought a Samsung.
>>>>>>> so easy to just say most bought a Samsung. likewise of all those
>>>>>>> who bought a car, most bought a Ranger.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> God, you're thick, a majority of people did not buy a Samsung,
>>>>>> only a minority did, therefor most people did NOT buy a Samsung.
>>>>>
>>>>> so by your reasoning.. a minority (of purchasers) bought a
>>>>> Samsung. and a minority bought an LG. and a minority bought a
>>>>> Hisense. so there was no majority of purchasers? but how can that
>>>>> be. UNLESS you say the majority bought a Samsung, which they did.
>>>>> so most purchasers bought a Samsung. or if you want to be entirely
>>>>> correct you would say.. "when buying a TV more purchasers buy a
>>>>> Samsung than any other brand". but in general conversation one
>>>>> would just say "the brand most ppl buy is Samsung". or simply
>>>>> "most ppl buy Samsung".
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you can't understand that then I'm sorry, but I'm not here to
>>>>>> teach English, maths and elementary logic.
>>>>>
>>>>> If you can't understand that then I'm sorry for you, but I'm happy
>>>>> to try to teach you English, maths and elementary logic
>>>>>
>>>>> but this may help..
>>>>>
>>>>> majority
>>>>>
>>>>> noun
>>>>> 1. the greater number.
>>>>> (snip)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> OTY
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> The iPhone is the most popular phone, but most people (i.e. the
>>>> majority of people) own an Android phone. Clear enough?
>>>>
>>>> Over an out.
>>>
>>> Now you're getting deceitful.
>>>
>>> The iPhone is a brand of phone (Apple)
>>> Android is a phone OS
>>>
>>> comparing apples to oranges (pun intended)
>>>
>>
>> exactly. irrelevant, inappropriate, and false analogy
>>
>
>
> ...and the mischievous illogical slimeball claims he was a programmer!
>
>

set the timer on his VCR?  :)

--
Have a nice day!..

Keithr0 wrote:
> On 25/01/2024 10:04 am, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>> Xeno wrote:
>>> On 25/1/2024 8:27 am, alvey wrote:
>>>> Noddy wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> It's his bi-polar hard at work. He's legitimately mental.
>>>>
>>>> Hahahahaha!
>>>>
>>>> Wow! *Three* stupidities in one line!
>>>>
>>>> 1. Amongst other disciplines, you are not qualified to assess
>>>> mental health. As far from it as Bumhole (Vic) is from picturesque
>>>> in fact.
>>>>
>>>> 2. You have referenced the disorder in a hopelessly inappropriate way.
>>>>
>>>> 3. You can't even spell it!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Always good for a laugh is the old Fraudster.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> alvey
>>>>
>>>>
>>> His last sentence is a real kicker. Tries to use big words in a
>>> sentence, pity he has no clue as to their meaning. Take his use of
>>> "legitimately" as a prime example. So "legitimately mental" means
>>> it's *legal/permissable* to be bipolar? I'm sure all those
>>> *diagnosed* with bipolar disorder will be happy to know they won't
>>> be immediately incarcerated!
>>
>> LOL!
>>
>>>
>>> Darren, the laugh a minute gift that keeps on giving!
>>>
>>
>> yes indeed. in common with keefy, in his desperate efforts to puff
>> himself up and blow others away, all he manages to achieve is to show
>> what a fool he is
>>
> Who's your dealer, he must sell the really good shit.

you already tried that one..

--
Have a nice day!..

On 25/1/2024 11:04 am, Mighty Mouse wrote:
> Xeno wrote:
>> On 25/1/2024 8:27 am, alvey wrote:
>>> Noddy wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> It's his bi-polar hard at work. He's legitimately mental.
>>>
>>> Hahahahaha!
>>>
>>> Wow! *Three* stupidities in one line!
>>>
>>> 1. Amongst other disciplines, you are not qualified to assess mental
>>> health. As far from it as Bumhole (Vic) is from picturesque in fact.
>>>
>>> 2. You have referenced the disorder in a hopelessly inappropriate way.
>>>
>>> 3. You can't even spell it!
>>>
>>>
>>> Always good for a laugh is the old Fraudster.
>>>
>>>
>>> alvey
>>>
>>>
>> His last sentence is a real kicker. Tries to use big words in a
>> sentence, pity he has no clue as to their meaning. Take his use of
>> "legitimately" as a prime example. So "legitimately mental" means it's
>> *legal/permissable* to be bipolar? I'm sure all those *diagnosed* with
>> bipolar disorder will be happy to know they won't be immediately
>> incarcerated!
>
> LOL!
>
>>
>> Darren, the laugh a minute gift that keeps on giving!
>>
>
> yes indeed. in common with keefy, in his desperate efforts to puff
> himself up and blow others away, all he manages to achieve is to show
> what a fool he is
>
Oh, Darren is the master of demonstrating he is a fool. In that he has
no peer.

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On 25/01/2024 12:19 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote:

> he has the intelligent ppl here blocked (Xeno, Clocky, alvey, me)

Either that's really good shit that you're getting, or it has fried you
brain already.

On 25/01/2024 10:24 am, Mighty Mouse wrote:
> Keithr0 wrote:
>> On 25/01/2024 10:04 am, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>> Xeno wrote:
>>>> On 25/1/2024 8:27 am, alvey wrote:
>>>>> Noddy wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's his bi-polar hard at work. He's legitimately mental.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hahahahaha!
>>>>>
>>>>> Wow! *Three* stupidities in one line!
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. Amongst other disciplines, you are not qualified to assess
>>>>> mental health. As far from it as Bumhole (Vic) is from picturesque
>>>>> in fact.
>>>>>
>>>>> 2. You have referenced the disorder in a hopelessly inappropriate way.
>>>>>
>>>>> 3. You can't even spell it!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Always good for a laugh is the old Fraudster.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> alvey
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> His last sentence is a real kicker. Tries to use big words in a
>>>> sentence, pity he has no clue as to their meaning. Take his use of
>>>> "legitimately" as a prime example. So "legitimately mental" means
>>>> it's *legal/permissable* to be bipolar? I'm sure all those
>>>> *diagnosed* with bipolar disorder will be happy to know they won't
>>>> be immediately incarcerated!
>>>
>>> LOL!
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Darren, the laugh a minute gift that keeps on giving!
>>>>
>>>
>>> yes indeed. in common with keefy, in his desperate efforts to puff
>>> himself up and blow others away, all he manages to achieve is to show
>>> what a fool he is
>>>
>> Who's your dealer, he must sell the really good shit.
>
> you already tried that one..
>

Failed the first time so ol' mate Sliemey the king of cringe thought
he'd give it a second run.

Still a fail :-)

In thread "May need to buy petrol soon" Sept 23 2021 11:15:59am
Keithr0 wrote: "He made the assertion either he proves it or he is a
proven liar."

On Sept 23 2021 3:16:29pm Keithr0 wrote:
"He asserts that the claim is true, so, if it is unproven, he is lying."

On 25/01/2024 11:35 am, Keithr0 wrote:
> On 25/01/2024 12:19 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>
>> he has the intelligent ppl here blocked (Xeno, Clocky, alvey, me)
>
> Either that's really good shit that you're getting, or it has fried you
> brain already.
>

Felix handed you yet another lesson Mr. 45% so what does that say about
you you fucking goose?

--
In thread "May need to buy petrol soon" Sept 23 2021 11:15:59am
Keithr0 wrote: "He made the assertion either he proves it or he is a
proven liar."

On Sept 23 2021 3:16:29pm Keithr0 wrote:
"He asserts that the claim is true, so, if it is unproven, he is lying."

On 25/01/2024 2:02 pm, Clocky wrote:
> On 25/01/2024 11:35 am, Keithr0 wrote:
>> On 25/01/2024 12:19 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>
>>> he has the intelligent ppl here blocked (Xeno, Clocky, alvey, me)
>>
>> Either that's really good shit that you're getting, or it has fried
>> you brain already.
>>
>
>
> Felix handed you yet another lesson Mr. 45% so what does that say about
> you you fucking goose?

Either that's really good shit that you're getting, or it has fried you
brain already.

On 26/01/2024 6:55 am, Keithr0 wrote:
> On 25/01/2024 2:02 pm, Clocky wrote:
>> On 25/01/2024 11:35 am, Keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 25/01/2024 12:19 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>>
>>>> he has the intelligent ppl here blocked (Xeno, Clocky, alvey, me)
>>>
>>> Either that's really good shit that you're getting, or it has fried
>>> you brain already.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Felix handed you yet another lesson Mr. 45% so what does that say
>> about you you fucking goose?
>
> Either that's really good shit that you're getting, or it has fried you
> brain already.
>

You know when you dispute it when people say you never admit you were
wrong? This is one of those times you're wrong and won't admit it.

Just so you know Sliemey.

--
In thread "May need to buy petrol soon" Sept 23 2021 11:15:59am
Keithr0 wrote: "He made the assertion either he proves it or he is a
proven liar."

On Sept 23 2021 3:16:29pm Keithr0 wrote:
"He asserts that the claim is true, so, if it is unproven, he is lying."