On Thu, 14 Mar 2024 12:25:15 +1100, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

<FLUSH the abnormal trolling senile cretin's latest trollshit unread>

--
Bill Wright addressing senile Ozzie cretin Rodent Speed:
"Well you make up a lot of stuff and it's total bollocks most of it."
MID: <pj2b07$1rvs$2@gioia.aioe.org>

On Thu, 14 Mar 2024 19:06:27 +1100, Daniel65
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:

>Petzl wrote on 14/3/24 12:01 pm:
>> On Wed, 13 Mar 2024 23:18:50 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro
>> <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
>>> On Thu, 14 Mar 2024 09:33:27 +1100, Petzl wrote:
>>>
>>>> But the fraud has been uncovered ...
>>>
>>> Not it has not. Haven’t you seen the pattern yet? Big claims of
>>> “fraud” until they step into a courtroom to actually present their
>>> evidence and make their case, when suddenly they go meek and
>>> silent. Then when the case is thrown out, they came back to the
>>> press conference, or the podcast with tier credulous followers, and
>>> repeat the “fraud” claims yet again.
>>>
>>> No evidence, just hot air and dissembling and misdirections, over
>>> and over.
>>>
>> The evidence is there just not acceptable to your fucked/PSYOP
>> brain.
>>
>What?? Lawrence seems to be accepting the evidence presented in Court
>.... You seem to be the one NOT accepting it, so are YOU, Petzl, the one
>with the 'fucked/PSYOP brain'??
>
No case of Election fraud bought up by US citizens, have ever got to
court.

For that to happen "evidence" needs the nod from the governor of the
affected state. They in turn would be advised by election
scrutinizers.

Lawsuits are a different kettle of fish.
But you know that!
--
Petzl
The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other
people's money.

On March fourteenth, in the year of our Lord. Eighteen eighty three
Karl Marx made his most important contribution to mankind...
He died

There is no difference between communism and socialism,
except in the means of achieving the same ultimate end:
communism proposes to enslave men by force,
socialism - by vote.
It is merely the difference between murder and suicide
#Margaret Thatcher

Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
> Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote
>> Petzl wrote
>>> Lawrence D'Oliveir <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote
>>>> Petzl wrote

>>>>> But the fraud has been uncovered ...

>>>> Not it has not. Haven’t you seen the pattern yet? Big claims of
>>>> “fraud” until they step into a courtroom to actually present their
>>>> evidence and make their case, when suddenly they go meek and
>>>> silent. Then when the case is thrown out, they came back to the
>>>> press conference, or the podcast with tier credulous followers, and
>>>> repeat the “fraud” claims yet again.

>>>> No evidence, just hot air and dissembling and misdirections, over
>>>> and over.

>>> The evidence is there just not acceptable to your fucked/PSYOP
>>> brain.

>> What?? Lawrence seems to be accepting the evidence presented in Court
>> .... You seem to be the one NOT accepting it, so are YOU, Petzl, the one
>> with the 'fucked/PSYOP brain'??

> No case of Election fraud bought up by US citizens, have ever got to
> court.

Wrong, as always.

> For that to happen "evidence" needs the nodfrom the governor of the
> affected state.

Wrong, as always.

> They in turn would be advised by election scrutinizers.

Wrong, as always.

> Lawsuits are a different kettle of fish.

That's COURT. fuckwit.

On Fri, 15 Mar 2024 06:23:46 +1100, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:

>Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
>> Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote
>>> Petzl wrote
>>>> Lawrence D'Oliveir <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote
>>>>> Petzl wrote
>
>>>>>> But the fraud has been uncovered ...
>
>>>>> Not it has not. Haven’t you seen the pattern yet? Big claims of
>>>>> “fraud” until they step into a courtroom to actually present their
>>>>> evidence and make their case, when suddenly they go meek and
>>>>> silent. Then when the case is thrown out, they came back to the
>>>>> press conference, or the podcast with tier credulous followers, and
>>>>> repeat the “fraud” claims yet again.
>
>>>>> No evidence, just hot air and dissembling and misdirections, over
>>>>> and over.
>
>>>> The evidence is there just not acceptable to your fucked/PSYOP
>>>> brain.
>
>>> What?? Lawrence seems to be accepting the evidence presented in Court
>>> .... You seem to be the one NOT accepting it, so are YOU, Petzl, the one
>>> with the 'fucked/PSYOP brain'??
>
>> No case of Election fraud bought up by US citizens, have ever got to
>> court.
>
>Wrong, as always.
>
>> For that to happen "evidence" needs the nodfrom the governor of the
>> affected state.
>
>Wrong, as always.
>
>> They in turn would be advised by election scrutinizers.
>
>Wrong, as always.
>
>> Lawsuits are a different kettle of fish.
>
>That's COURT. fuckwit.
>
"No case of Election fraud bought up by US citizens, have ever got to
court."
Operative word is "case"

Litigation is a argument, arguded in court.

Not for law breaking which "Election fraud" is
But you knew that.
--
Petzl
Good lawyers know the law
Great lawyers know the judge

justice is open to all; like the Ritz hotel
High Court reveals every current judge is a
member of Qantas’ ‘most exclusive club in Australia’
The High Court has exposed secret members of Qantas’
exclusive Chairman’s Lounge amid a landmark case over
the sacking of 1700 workers.

Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>> Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
>>> Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote
>>>> Petzl wrote
>>>>> Lawrence D'Oliveir <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote
>>>>>> Petzl wrote

>>>>>>> But the fraud has been uncovered ...

>>>>>> Not it has not. Haven’t you seen the pattern yet? Big claims of
>>>>>> “fraud” until they step into a courtroom to actually present their
>>>>>> evidence and make their case, when suddenly they go meek and
>>>>>> silent. Then when the case is thrown out, they came back to the
>>>>>> press conference, or the podcast with tier credulous followers, and
>>>>>> repeat the “fraud” claims yet again.

>>>>>> No evidence, just hot air and dissembling and misdirections, over
>>>>>> and over.

>>>>> The evidence is there just not acceptable to your fucked/PSYOP
>>>>> brain.

>>>> What?? Lawrence seems to be accepting the evidence presented in Court
>>>> .... You seem to be the one NOT accepting it, so are YOU, Petzl, the
>>>> one
>>>> with the 'fucked/PSYOP brain'??

>>> No case of Election fraud bought up by US citizens, have ever got to
>>> court.

>> Wrong, as always.

>>> For that to happen "evidence" needs the nodfrom the governor of the
>>> affected state.

>> Wrong, as always.

>>> They in turn would be advised by election scrutinizers.

>> Wrong, as always.

>>> Lawsuits are a different kettle of fish.

>> That's COURT. fuckwit.

> "No case of Election fraud bought upby US citizens, have ever got to
> court."

Wrong, as always.

> Operative word is "case"

Wrong, as always.

> Litigation is a argument, arguded in court.

And even you should have noticed that court is involved.

> Not for law breaking

Wrong, as always.

> which "Election fraud" is

Duh

On Fri, 15 Mar 2024 08:00:49 +1100, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:

>Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>>> Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
>>>> Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote
>>>>> Petzl wrote
>>>>>> Lawrence D'Oliveir <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote
>>>>>>> Petzl wrote
>
>>>>>>>> But the fraud has been uncovered ...
>
>>>>>>> Not it has not. Haven’t you seen the pattern yet? Big claims of
>>>>>>> “fraud” until they step into a courtroom to actually present their
>>>>>>> evidence and make their case, when suddenly they go meek and
>>>>>>> silent. Then when the case is thrown out, they came back to the
>>>>>>> press conference, or the podcast with tier credulous followers, and
>>>>>>> repeat the “fraud” claims yet again.
>
>>>>>>> No evidence, just hot air and dissembling and misdirections, over
>>>>>>> and over.
>
>>>>>> The evidence is there just not acceptable to your fucked/PSYOP
>>>>>> brain.
>
>>>>> What?? Lawrence seems to be accepting the evidence presented in Court
>>>>> .... You seem to be the one NOT accepting it, so are YOU, Petzl, the
>>>>> one
>>>>> with the 'fucked/PSYOP brain'??
>
>>>> No case of Election fraud bought up by US citizens, have ever got to
>>>> court.
>
>>> Wrong, as always.
>
>>>> For that to happen "evidence" needs the nodfrom the governor of the
>>>> affected state.
>
>>> Wrong, as always.
>
>>>> They in turn would be advised by election scrutinizers.
>
>>> Wrong, as always.
>
>>>> Lawsuits are a different kettle of fish.
>
>>> That's COURT. fuckwit.
>
>> "No case of Election fraud bought upby US citizens, have ever got to
>> court."
>
>Wrong, as always.
>
>> Operative word is "case"
>
>Wrong, as always.
>
>> Litigation is a argument, arguded in court.
>
>And even you should have noticed that court is involved.
>
>> Not for law breaking
>
>Wrong, as always.
>
>> which "Election fraud" is
>
>Duh
>
No case of US lawbreaking "Election fraud" is has gone to court.
your pedantic's are showing again
--
Petzl
What is the harm of for the Democrats validating the voting system.
Is it because the Democrats have something to hide?

Amazing to think that Lyndon Johnson perfected the
'sit-wait-see how many we need to win-then dump our
stuffed ballots at the last moment' electoral technique
in post-war Texas, and nothing has changed in US elections
in the 7 decades since.
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1948_United_States_Senate_election_in_Texas#Legal_battle>
The Left is fine with Vaccine Cards
but NOT voter IDs. Paying attention yet?

Daniel65

/snip/

> Petz
>> The evidence is there just not acceptable to your fucked/PSYOP
>> brain.
>>
> What?? Lawrence seems to be accepting the evidence presented in Court
> .... You seem to be the one NOT accepting it, so are YOU, Petzl, the one
> with the 'fucked/PSYOP brain'??

There is absolutely no need to PSYOP someone who is in a constant state
GoonCon 3+ inebriation. His grip on facts and reality is completely
evaporated so he keeps on fighting ghosts and foggy apparitions all the
time, like our village idiot Petz does in this instance.

;-)

--
Ördög
The on duty Newsgroup Devil

Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>> Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>>>> Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
>>>>> Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote
>>>>>> Petzl wrote
>>>>>>> Lawrence D'Oliveir <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote
>>>>>>>> Petzl wrote

>>>>>>>>> But the fraud has been uncovered ...

>>>>>>>> Not it has not. Haven’t you seen the pattern yet? Big claims of
>>>>>>>> “fraud” until they step into a courtroom to actually present their
>>>>>>>> evidence and make their case, when suddenly they go meek and
>>>>>>>> silent. Then when the case is thrown out, they came back to the
>>>>>>>> press conference, or the podcast with tier credulous followers,
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>> repeat the “fraud” claims yet again.

>>>>>>>> No evidence, just hot air and dissembling and misdirections, over
>>>>>>>> and over.

>>>>>>> The evidence is there just not acceptable to your fucked/PSYOP
>>>>>>> brain.

>>>>>> What?? Lawrence seems to be accepting the evidence presented in
>>>>>> Court
>>>>>> .... You seem to be the one NOT accepting it, so are YOU, Petzl, the
>>>>>> one
>>>>>> with the 'fucked/PSYOP brain'??

>>>>> No case of Election fraud bought up by US citizens, have ever got to
>>>>> court.

>>>> Wrong, as always.

>>>>> For that to happen "evidence" needs the nodfrom the governor of the
>>>>> affected state.

>>>> Wrong, as always.

>>>>> They in turn would be advised by election scrutinizers.

>>>> Wrong, as always.

>>>>> Lawsuits are a different kettle of fish.

>>>> That's COURT. fuckwit.

>>> "No case of Election fraud bought upby US citizens, have ever got to
>>> court."

>> Wrong, as always.

>>> Operative word is "case"

>> Wrong, as always.

>>> Litigation is a argument, arguded in court.

>> And even you should have noticed that court is involved.

>>> Not for law breaking

>> Wrong, as always.

>>> which "Election fraud" is

>> Duh

> No case of US lawbreaking "Election fraud" is has gone to court.

Wrong, as always.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-election_lawsuits_related_to_the_2020_U.S._presidential_election
https://www.google.com/search?q=2020+presidential+election+fraud+court

On Fri, 15 Mar 2024 11:04:07 +1100, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:

>Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>>> Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
>>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>>>>> Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
>>>>>> Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote
>>>>>>> Petzl wrote
>>>>>>>> Lawrence D'Oliveir <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote
>>>>>>>>> Petzl wrote
>
>>>>>>>>>> But the fraud has been uncovered ...
>
>>>>>>>>> Not it has not. Haven’t you seen the pattern yet? Big claims of
>>>>>>>>> “fraud” until they step into a courtroom to actually present their
>>>>>>>>> evidence and make their case, when suddenly they go meek and
>>>>>>>>> silent. Then when the case is thrown out, they came back to the
>>>>>>>>> press conference, or the podcast with tier credulous followers,
>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>> repeat the “fraud” claims yet again.
>
>>>>>>>>> No evidence, just hot air and dissembling and misdirections, over
>>>>>>>>> and over.
>
>>>>>>>> The evidence is there just not acceptable to your fucked/PSYOP
>>>>>>>> brain.
>
>>>>>>> What?? Lawrence seems to be accepting the evidence presented in
>>>>>>> Court
>>>>>>> .... You seem to be the one NOT accepting it, so are YOU, Petzl, the
>>>>>>> one
>>>>>>> with the 'fucked/PSYOP brain'??
>
>>>>>> No case of Election fraud bought up by US citizens, have ever got to
>>>>>> court.
>
>>>>> Wrong, as always.
>
>>>>>> For that to happen "evidence" needs the nodfrom the governor of the
>>>>>> affected state.
>
>>>>> Wrong, as always.
>
>>>>>> They in turn would be advised by election scrutinizers.
>
>>>>> Wrong, as always.
>
>>>>>> Lawsuits are a different kettle of fish.
>
>>>>> That's COURT. fuckwit.
>
>>>> "No case of Election fraud bought upby US citizens, have ever got to
>>>> court."
>
>>> Wrong, as always.
>
>>>> Operative word is "case"
>
>>> Wrong, as always.
>
>>>> Litigation is a argument, arguded in court.
>
>>> And even you should have noticed that court is involved.
>
>>>> Not for law breaking
>
>>> Wrong, as always.
>
>>>> which "Election fraud" is
>
>>> Duh
>
>> No case of US lawbreaking "Election fraud" is has gone to court.
>
>Wrong, as always.
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-election_lawsuits_related_to_the_2020_U.S._presidential_election
>https://www.google.com/search?q=2020+presidential+election+fraud+court
>
Again not a law case
Lawsuits/Litigation are games by ambulance chasers.
The only thing a court believes is evidence produced by supposed
independent scrutinizers who passed the OK to their state governor
--
Petzl
What is the harm of for the Democrats validating the voting system.
Is it because the Democrats have something to hide?

Amazing to think that Lyndon Johnson perfected the
'sit-wait-see how many we need to win-then dump our
stuffed ballots at the last moment' electoral technique
in post-war Texas, and nothing has changed in US elections
in the 7 decades since.
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1948_United_States_Senate_election_in_Texas#Legal_battle>
The Left is fine with Vaccine Cards
but NOT voter IDs. Paying attention yet?

Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>> Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>>>> Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
>>>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>>>>>> Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
>>>>>>> Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote
>>>>>>>> Petzl wrote
>>>>>>>>> Lawrence D'Oliveir <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote
>>>>>>>>>> Petzl wrote

>>>>>>>>>>> But the fraud has been uncovered ...

>>>>>>>>>> Not it has not. Haven’t you seen the pattern yet? Big claims of
>>>>>>>>>> “fraud” until they step into a courtroom to actually present
>>>>>>>>>> their
>>>>>>>>>> evidence and make their case, when suddenly they go meek and
>>>>>>>>>> silent. Then when the case is thrown out, they came back to the
>>>>>>>>>> press conference, or the podcast with tier credulous followers,
>>>>>>>>>> and repeat the “fraud” claims yet again.

>>>>>>>>>> No evidence, just hot air and dissembling and misdirections,
>>>>>>>>>> over and over.

>>>>>>>>> The evidence is there just not acceptable to your fucked/PSYOP
>>>>>>>>> brain.

>>>>>>>> What?? Lawrence seems to be accepting the evidence presented in
>>>>>>>> Court
>>>>>>>> .... You seem to be the one NOT accepting it, so are YOU, Petzl,
>>>>>>>> the one with the 'fucked/PSYOP brain'??

>>>>>>> No case of Election fraud bought up by US citizens, have ever got
>>>>>>> to court.

>>>>>> Wrong, as always.

>>>>>>> For that to happen "evidence" needs the nodfrom the governor of
>>>>>>> the affected state.

>>>>>> Wrong, as always.

>>>>>>> They in turn would be advised by election scrutinizers.

>>>>>> Wrong, as always.

>>>>>>> Lawsuits are a different kettle of fish.

>>>>>> That's COURT. fuckwit.

>>>>> "No case of Election fraud bought upby US citizens, have ever got to
>>>>> court."

>>>> Wrong, as always.

>>>>> Operative word is "case"

>>>> Wrong, as always.

>>>>> Litigation is a argument, arguded in court.

>>>> And even you should have noticed that court is involved.

>>>>> Not for law breaking

>>>> Wrong, as always.

>>>>> which "Election fraud" is

>>>> Duh

>>> No case of US lawbreaking "Election fraud" is has gone to court.

>> Wrong, as always.
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-election_lawsuits_related_to_the_2020_U.S._presidential_election

> Again not a law case

Corse it is that's why it called a LAWSUIT, fuckwit

> Lawsuits/Litigation are games by ambulance chasers.

And by those who believe that there has been voter
fraud when in fact there has never been enough to
matter in that particular presidential election.

> The only thing a court believes is evidence produced by supposed
> independent scrutinizers who passed the OK to their state governor

How odd that NOT ONE of those lawsuits has EVER
been toosed out by the just saying anything like that.

>> https://www.google.com/search?q=2020+presidential+election+fraud+court

Peeler wrote on 14/3/24 8:21 pm:
> On Thu, 14 Mar 2024 14:54:00 +1100, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
> Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:
>
> <FLUSH the abnormal trolling senile cretin's latest trollshit unread>
>
I know Roddles DOES spout some Prime Rubbish sometimes .... but some of
his stuff IS interesting!!

YOU strike me as being MORE of a TROLL than Roddles is!!
--
Daniel

Petzl wrote on 14/3/24 8:38 pm:
> On Thu, 14 Mar 2024 19:06:27 +1100, Daniel65
> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>> Petzl wrote on 14/3/24 12:01 pm:
>>> On Wed, 13 Mar 2024 23:18:50 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro
>>> <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 14 Mar 2024 09:33:27 +1100, Petzl wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> But the fraud has been uncovered ...
>>>>
>>>> Not it has not. Haven’t you seen the pattern yet? Big claims
>>>> of “fraud” until they step into a courtroom to actually present
>>>> their evidence and make their case, when suddenly they go meek
>>>> and silent. Then when the case is thrown out, they came back to
>>>> the press conference, or the podcast with tier credulous
>>>> followers, and repeat the “fraud” claims yet again.
>>>>
>>>> No evidence, just hot air and dissembling and misdirections,
>>>> over and over.
>>>>
>>> The evidence is there just not acceptable to your fucked/PSYOP
>>> brain.
>>>
>> What?? Lawrence seems to be accepting the evidence presented in
>> Court .... You seem to be the one NOT accepting it, so are YOU,
>> Petzl, the one with the 'fucked/PSYOP brain'??
>>
> No case of Election fraud bought up by US citizens, have ever got to
> court.

"have ever got to court" .... *YET* !!.

> For that to happen "evidence" needs the nod from the governor of the
> affected state. They in turn would be advised by election
> scrutinizers.
>
> Lawsuits are a different kettle of fish. But you know that!
>
.... and hasn't he got a few of them upcoming??
--
Daniel

3On Fri, 15 Mar 2024 19:19:42 +1100, Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org>
wrote:

> Peeler wrote on 14/3/24 8:21 pm:
>> On Thu, 14 Mar 2024 14:54:00 +1100, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
>> Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:
>> <FLUSH the abnormal trolling senile cretin's latest trollshit unread>
>>
> I know Roddles DOES spout some Prime Rubbish sometimes .... but some of
> his stuff IS interesting!!
>
> YOU strike me as being MORE of a TROLL than Roddles is!!

That fucker does nothing but post that shit in response
to every single post I and a few others make.

At least we do keep that fucker off the streets

On Fri, 15 Mar 2024 19:19:42 +1100, Daniel65
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:

>Peeler wrote on 14/3/24 8:21 pm:
>> On Thu, 14 Mar 2024 14:54:00 +1100, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
>> Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:
>>
>> <FLUSH the abnormal trolling senile cretin's latest trollshit unread>
>>
>I know Roddles DOES spout some Prime Rubbish sometimes .... but some of
>his stuff IS interesting!!
>
My conclusion also
>
>YOU strike me as being MORE of a TROLL than Roddles is!!
>
Just become to dislike Rod's never ending replies
--
Petzl

Islam is of course synonymous with terrorism
There are more Australian Muslims fighting with al Qaeda linked
groups than there are in the Australian Defence Force fighting against them!
..
Major majority of the worlds refugees are created by Islam since the
days of Mohammad. Mainly because Islam is actually a violent political
process, not a religion at all.
Islamic conquests have always been by infiltration (Trojan Horse:
Al-Hijra, The Islamic Doctrine of Immigration). This is how Islam
grows, a violent political process using , terrorist attack from
within, eventually followed by surprise attack, followed by killing
for killings sake.
Once Moslems have foothold maintaining rule is held by continued
carnage and ruthlessness.
Until it's recognized Islam is the problem nothing will change!
How Islam began and still violently grows
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ERou_Q5l9Gw

On Fri, 15 Mar 2024 19:22:29 +1100, Daniel65
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:

>Petzl wrote on 14/3/24 8:38 pm:
>> On Thu, 14 Mar 2024 19:06:27 +1100, Daniel65
>> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>> Petzl wrote on 14/3/24 12:01 pm:
>>>> On Wed, 13 Mar 2024 23:18:50 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro
>>>> <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 14 Mar 2024 09:33:27 +1100, Petzl wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> But the fraud has been uncovered ...
>>>>>
>>>>> Not it has not. Haven’t you seen the pattern yet? Big claims
>>>>> of “fraud” until they step into a courtroom to actually present
>>>>> their evidence and make their case, when suddenly they go meek
>>>>> and silent. Then when the case is thrown out, they came back to
>>>>> the press conference, or the podcast with tier credulous
>>>>> followers, and repeat the “fraud” claims yet again.
>>>>>
>>>>> No evidence, just hot air and dissembling and misdirections,
>>>>> over and over.
>>>>>
>>>> The evidence is there just not acceptable to your fucked/PSYOP
>>>> brain.
>>>>
>>> What?? Lawrence seems to be accepting the evidence presented in
>>> Court .... You seem to be the one NOT accepting it, so are YOU,
>>> Petzl, the one with the 'fucked/PSYOP brain'??
>>>
>> No case of Election fraud bought up by US citizens, have ever got to
>> court.
>
>"have ever got to court" .... *YET* !!.
>
Yes and their is a difference between a law case and litigation cases
These litigation cases are all paid by corrupt democrat lawfare paid
by tax payers!
Try to see what is really happening/going on in US
just one interview by a Scott journo with a American one
<https://rumble.com/v4jd9df-interview-did-hunter-biden-spike-his-dads-coffee.html>
https://t.ly/_mDxv
INTERVIEW: Did Hunter Biden spike his dad’s coffee??
>
>> For that to happen "evidence" needs the nod from the governor of the
>> affected state. They in turn would be advised by election
>> scrutinizers.
>>
>> Lawsuits are a different kettle of fish. But you know that!
>>
>... and hasn't he got a few of them upcoming??
--
Petzl
Every time I speak of the haters and losers
I do so with great love and affection.
They cannot help the fact that they were born fucked up!

The loudest whiners on Trump's withdrawal
from Paris Climate Change
are those who profit the most (like Al Gore).

Donald Trump
https://youtu.be/kGg4Oywfbyw

Rod Speed wrote on 15/3/24 7:38 pm:
> 3On Fri, 15 Mar 2024 19:19:42 +1100, Daniel65
> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>> Peeler wrote on 14/3/24 8:21 pm:
>>> On Thu, 14 Mar 2024 14:54:00 +1100, cantankerous trolling geezer
>>> Rodent Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered,
>>> again: <FLUSH the abnormal trolling senile cretin's latest
>>> trollshit unread>
>>>
>> I know Roddles DOES spout some Prime Rubbish sometimes .... but
>> some of his stuff IS interesting!!
>>
>> YOU strike me as being MORE of a TROLL than Roddles is!!
>
> That fucker does nothing but post that shit in response to every
> single post I

Yes, I've noticed that, too!!

> and a few others make.
>
> At least we do keep that fucker off the streets

"Always look on the bright side of life", ah, Rod!
--
Daniel

Daniel65:

> Alzheimer Rod, the old fart anger management disaster
>> Daniel65

/snip/

>>> I know Roddles DOES spout some Prime Rubbish sometimes .... but
>>> some of his stuff IS interesting!!

I don't see how! The newsgroup would be heaps better off w/o his troll
posts, specially when he keeps replying to cross posting septic morons.

>>> YOU strike me as being MORE of a TROLL than Roddles is!!
>>
>> That fucker does nothing but post that shit in response to every
>> single post I and a few others make.
>> At least we do keep that fucker off the streets

~~~
> Yes, I've noticed that, too!!
> "Always look on the bright side of life", ah, Rod!

Well, Alzheimer Rod has absolutely no clout in asserting any superiority
over these septic and UK trolls who flood Usenet with their verbal vomits.

Basically Alzheimer Rod is abusing anyone and everyone all the time to
somehow prove his imaginary superiority over all others in the Universe.
I am yet to see any well reason counterargument posted by him on any
subject that is more than just the very same tired old millions of times
regurgitated boring abuse.

"Bullshit there is...", "just because some fool claims something...", or
"...your lard arse..." and similar are NO logical counter-arguments any
rational person could acknowledge as such.

Admittedly, in case of Petz, who ain't capable of digesting any sort of
arguments good or bad, such style of reply could be justified, but
Alzheimer Rod is using these types of counters all the time against
every single poster in this newsgroup. And this is NOT OK!

--
Ördög
The on duty Newsgroup Devil

Peeler wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Mar 2024 17:27:10 +1100, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
> Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:
>
> <FLUSH the abnormal trolling senile cretin's latest trollshit unread>
>
And nothing is left!

Michael