Such schisms invite further schisms and splits until we
arrived at Tik Tok "bishop" Mar Mari Emmanuel.
The Church of Rome is the true beacon to follow!

The resurrection of the dead presupposes that doctrinal error will
eventually be overcome — such as: “For if the truth of God hath more
abounded through my lie unto his glory; why yet am I also judged as a
sinner?” [Romans 3:7]

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?lexicon:g5582>

#1346 as [#700, #5, #400, #200, #40, #1] = pseûsma (G5582): {UMBRA: #1346 %
#41 = #34} 1) a falsehood, a lie; 2) the perfidy by which a man by sinning
breaks faith with God;

G5582@{
{@1: Sup: 52 - MEASURE: TU (#52); Ego: 52 - MEASURE: TU (#52)},
{@2: Sup: 57 - GUARDEDNESS: SHOU (#109); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO
(#57)},
{@3: Sup: 52 - MEASURE: TU (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9} / I AM
NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 76 - AGGRAVATION: CHU (#133)},
{@4: Sup: 9 - BRANCHING OUT: SHU (#170); Ego: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#171
- I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE {%20})},
{@5: Sup: 49 - FLIGHT: T'AO (#219); Ego: 40 - LAW / MODEL: FA (#211 -
MALE DEME IS UNNAMED {%13})},
{@6: Sup: 50 - VASTNESS / WASTING: T'ANG (#269); Ego: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG
(#212)},
Male: #269; Feme: #212
} // #1346

Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
> Such schisms invite further schisms and splits until we
> arrived at Tik Tok "bishop" Mar Mari Emmanuel.

#1346 as [#1, #30, #30, #70, #300, #100, #10, #70, #5, #80, #10, #200, #20,
#70, #80, #70, #200] = allotriepískopos (G244): {UMBRA: #1276 % #41 = #5}
1) one who takes the supervision of affairs pertaining to others and in no
wise to himself, a meddler in other men's affairs;

> The Church of Rome is the true beacon to follow!
>
>

#70 - 𝍋割 = #521
COGITO: [#77, #44, #44, #42, #62] as #70 - SEVERANCE (KE)
RANGE: noon 28 OCTOBER to 01 NOVEMBER

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Mystery&tetra:70>

[#77 {@1: Sup: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN (#77); Ego: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN
(#77)}

#44 {@2: Sup: 40 - LAW / MODEL: FA (#117 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED {%18});
Ego: 44 - STOVE: TSAO (#121)}

#44 {@3: Sup: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#120); Ego: 44 - STOVE: TSAO (#165)}

#42 {@4: Sup: 45 - GREATNESS: TA (#165); Ego: 42 - GOING TO MEET: YING
(#207)}

#62] {@5: Sup: 26 - ENDEAVOUR: WU (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE
SACRED ANIMALS {%32}); Ego: 62 - DOUBT: YI (#269)}

TELOS TOTAL: #269
ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #191
DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #117

#790 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #117 as [#200, #1, #4, #4, #70, #400, #20, #1,
#10, #70, #10] /
#1380 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #117 as [#200, #1, #4, #4, #70, #400, #20, #1,
#10, #70, #400, #200] = Saddoukaîos (G4523): {UMBRA: #980 % #41 = #37} 0)
Sadducees = 'the righteous'; 1) a religious party at the time of Christ
among the Jews, who denied that the oral law was a revelation of God to the
Israelites, and who deemed the written law alone to be obligatory on the
nation, as the divine authority. They denied the following doctrines:; 1a)
*resurrection* of the body; 1b) immortality of the soul; 1c) existence of
spirits and angels; 1d) divine predestination, affirmed free will;

#29 - 𝌢斷 = #480
COGITO: [#11, #78, #58, #53, #12] as #29 - DECISIVENESS (TUAN)
RANGE: 27 APRIL to noon 01 MAY

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Mystery&tetra:29>

[#11 {@1: Sup: 11 - DIVERGENCE: CH'A (#11); Ego: 11 - DIVERGENCE: CH'A
(#11)}

#78 {@2: Sup: 8 - OPPOSITION: KAN (#19); Ego: 78 - ON THE VERGE: CHIANG
(#89)}

#58 {@3: Sup: 66 - DEPARTURE: CH'U (#85); Ego: 58 - GATHERING IN: HSI (#147
- MALE DEME IS UNNAMED {%21})}

#53 {@4: Sup: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#123); Ego: 53 - ETERNITY: YUNG (#200 -
I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY {%8} / I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED
PROPERTY {%8})}

#12] {@5: Sup: 50 - VASTNESS / WASTING: T'ANG (#173 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO
UNNATURAL LUST {%27}); Ego: 12 - YOUTHFULNESS: T'UNG (#212)}

TELOS TOTAL: #212
ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #373
DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #347

#344 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #373 as [#5, #50, #10, #20, #8, #200, #1, #50]
= nikáō (G3528): {UMBRA: #881 % #41 = #20} 1) to conquer; 1a) to carry off
the victory, come off victorious; 1a1) of Christ, victorious over all His
foes; 1a2) of Christians, that hold fast their faith even unto *death*
against the power of their foes, and temptations and persecutions; 1a3)
when one is arraigned or goes to law, to win the case, maintain one's
cause;

--

Check out our SAVVY module prototype that facilitates a movable / resizable
DIALOG and complex dropdown MENU interface deploying the third party d3
library.
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?heuristic>
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/Savvy.zip> (Download resources)

We already have a meta-description of #237 - USE OF FORCE associated to
the [#0, #40, #41, #81, #30] template prototype but the consideration is
whether we can deduce some metalogic axioms from our scenario [#230,
#232, #249, #228, #237] where the use of an object knife for instance,
is both an engendering nature: #237 - #230 = #7 and a strategic
grounding action #237 - #232 = #5 which is an atrocity consequential to
the autonomy: #237 - #228 = #9 but also the general populace: #249 -
#237 = #12...

But just how elastic and vital are these meta logical premises that a
specific category #258 might provide a #30 - bold resolution to atrocity
#228

47    7    63
55   39    23
15    71    31

71
118
141
204
243
258
313
344
351

We need to be mindful where the #237 is itself a LIMIT as a DEME
boundary (ie. excluding for the moment either its usage by selection or
aggregated extension) such that the #237 - USE OF FORCE associated with
the BIPARTITE PROTOTYPE #228 - WITNESSING TRAVESTY AS REPROACH is
entirely a systemic product of ONTIC moral proscription abandonment for
rightful action and a steeping effect of the prototype artifice itself,
such that water finds its own course which is here biased by conformity
with the patterning imposed by the immaterial elements @1 / @5 as then a
fixed mindset which cannot change?

It will always find some self justification but the problem is the
paradigm as the foundation of belief and being.

We see the resolution of the problem is firstly a metalogic
quantification of the human being and not chasing after endless self
justification by such.

We cannot be shallow here given there is already conveyed a viable
metalogical proposition of a BIPOLAR REALITY (ie. not a medical
diagnosis but a paradigm of action: #365 - YANG: LUO SHU / #364 - YIN:
T'AI HSUAN + fusion)...

Thus whilst the principle of a specific category #258 might provide a
#30 - bold resolution to atrocity #228 we must understand that informal
research postulations may be made upon certain assumptions which from
case studies do not hold true.

For instance whilst the HETEROS PROTOTYPE #SEVEN (#117 / #351) has an
equivalent locus to the BIPOLAR REALITY as LUO SHU PROTOTYPE #THREE
(#117 / #351) in possessing a meta descriptor of #75 - FAILURE (SHIH) -
𝍐失 = #526 as COGITO: [#58, #27, #27, #49, #46] that our #364 - YIN:
T'AI HSUAN assay of an array ONLY makes an artifice metalogic assertion:
[#9 - vCORAL, #8 - vCYAN, #1 ... #7 - CAUSALITY] where the #65 - INNER
(NEI) / H54 - Marriageable Maiden, Converting the Maiden is then the
CENTRE or AUTONOMOUS DELIMITED PRINCIPLE with a MATERIALITY is
associated to #75 - FAILURE (SHIH) and in its SPIRAL ASSAY also includes
#228 and thus there is no in-equitability of paradigm consequence.

57    56    49
66    65    58
75    74    67

74
131
189
238
303
378
444
511
567

<https://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

WHICH MIGHT RELY ON A SPIRAL ASSAY ARRAY TO MEDIATE AGAINST THE
BIPARTITE HYPOSTASIS:

58, {@4: Sup: 58 - GATHERING IN: HSI (#228 - I HAVE NO UNJUST
PREFERENCES {%40}); Ego: 58 - GATHERING IN: HSI (#220 - I CURSE NOT A
GOD {%38} / I CURSE NOT A GOD {%38})} <-- ****

So whilst we might easily extrapolation the paradigm of action: #365 -
YANG: LUO SHU / #364 - YIN: T'AI HSUAN) to domestic violence being
likewise #228 - TRAVESTY as occurring within an optimal state of FUSION,
ours is only an INFORMAL RESEARCH proposition and we are not qualified
to make any #491 - AGENCY (ie. which is why they are established) or
ontic JURISPRUDENCE statements.

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/Hitler%20Claim%20to%20Science.jpeg>

30    75    12
21    39    57
66    3    48

3
33
90
102
141
207
228 <-- ****
276
351

<http://www.grapple369.com/x-files/Lawyer%20Notes%2020240409%20%28public%29.pdf>

There is one more observation which I make of categories #230 and #297
with the later the sum for BIPARTITE NUMBER PROTOTYPE #ONE and the
COURSE OF NATURE deploying the same assay method for PROTOTYPE #ONE / #NINE

COURSE #ONE 
77    78    79

5    6     7

14    15    16

15

92

99

178

184

198

203

219

297 <-- ROMAN PROTOTYPE

COURSE #NINE
23    24    25

32    33    34

41    42    43

42

65

99

124

157

198

230 <-- *** 

273

297 <-- ROMAN PROTOTYPE

The baying for blood "BRING HIM OUT" belongs to the same class of
statement as "CRUCIFY HIM" or "DEATH TO AMERICA" / "DEATH TO ISRAEL".

"Except it be for this one voice, that I cried standing among them,
Touching the resurrection of the dead I am called in question by you
this day.

And when Felix heard these things, having more perfect knowledge of that
way, he deferred them, and said, When Lysias the chief captain shall
come down, I will know the uttermost of your matter." [Acts 24:21-22]

On 18/4/2024 14:35, dolf wrote:
> The resurrection of the dead presupposes that doctrinal error will
> eventually be overcome — such as: “For if the truth of God hath more
> abounded through my lie unto his glory; why yet am I also judged as a
> sinner?” [Romans 3:7]
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?lexicon:g5582>
>
> #1346 as [#700, #5, #400, #200, #40, #1] = pseûsma (G5582): {UMBRA: #1346 %
> #41 = #34} 1) a falsehood, a lie; 2) the perfidy by which a man by sinning
> breaks faith with God;
>
> G5582@{
> {@1: Sup: 52 - MEASURE: TU (#52); Ego: 52 - MEASURE: TU (#52)},
> {@2: Sup: 57 - GUARDEDNESS: SHOU (#109); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO
> (#57)},
> {@3: Sup: 52 - MEASURE: TU (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9} / I AM
> NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 76 - AGGRAVATION: CHU (#133)},
> {@4: Sup: 9 - BRANCHING OUT: SHU (#170); Ego: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#171
> - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE {%20})},
> {@5: Sup: 49 - FLIGHT: T'AO (#219); Ego: 40 - LAW / MODEL: FA (#211 -
> MALE DEME IS UNNAMED {%13})},
> {@6: Sup: 50 - VASTNESS / WASTING: T'ANG (#269); Ego: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG
> (#212)},
> Male: #269; Feme: #212
> } // #1346
>
> Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
>> Such schisms invite further schisms and splits until we
>> arrived at Tik Tok "bishop" Mar Mari Emmanuel.
>
> #1346 as [#1, #30, #30, #70, #300, #100, #10, #70, #5, #80, #10, #200, #20,
> #70, #80, #70, #200] = allotriepískopos (G244): {UMBRA: #1276 % #41 = #5}
> 1) one who takes the supervision of affairs pertaining to others and in no
> wise to himself, a meddler in other men's affairs;
>
>> The Church of Rome is the true beacon to follow!
>>
>>
>
> #70 - 𝍋割 = #521
> COGITO: [#77, #44, #44, #42, #62] as #70 - SEVERANCE (KE)
> RANGE: noon 28 OCTOBER to 01 NOVEMBER
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Mystery&tetra:70>
>
> [#77 {@1: Sup: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN (#77); Ego: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN
> (#77)}
>
> #44 {@2: Sup: 40 - LAW / MODEL: FA (#117 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED {%18});
> Ego: 44 - STOVE: TSAO (#121)}
>
> #44 {@3: Sup: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#120); Ego: 44 - STOVE: TSAO (#165)}
>
> #42 {@4: Sup: 45 - GREATNESS: TA (#165); Ego: 42 - GOING TO MEET: YING
> (#207)}
>
> #62] {@5: Sup: 26 - ENDEAVOUR: WU (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE
> SACRED ANIMALS {%32}); Ego: 62 - DOUBT: YI (#269)}
>
> TELOS TOTAL: #269
> ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #191
> DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #117
>
> #790 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #117 as [#200, #1, #4, #4, #70, #400, #20, #1,
> #10, #70, #10] /
> #1380 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #117 as [#200, #1, #4, #4, #70, #400, #20, #1,
> #10, #70, #400, #200] = Saddoukaîos (G4523): {UMBRA: #980 % #41 = #37} 0)
> Sadducees = 'the righteous'; 1) a religious party at the time of Christ
> among the Jews, who denied that the oral law was a revelation of God to the
> Israelites, and who deemed the written law alone to be obligatory on the
> nation, as the divine authority. They denied the following doctrines:; 1a)
> *resurrection* of the body; 1b) immortality of the soul; 1c) existence of
> spirits and angels; 1d) divine predestination, affirmed free will;
>
> #29 - 𝌢斷 = #480
> COGITO: [#11, #78, #58, #53, #12] as #29 - DECISIVENESS (TUAN)
> RANGE: 27 APRIL to noon 01 MAY
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Mystery&tetra:29>
>
> [#11 {@1: Sup: 11 - DIVERGENCE: CH'A (#11); Ego: 11 - DIVERGENCE: CH'A
> (#11)}
>
> #78 {@2: Sup: 8 - OPPOSITION: KAN (#19); Ego: 78 - ON THE VERGE: CHIANG
> (#89)}
>
> #58 {@3: Sup: 66 - DEPARTURE: CH'U (#85); Ego: 58 - GATHERING IN: HSI (#147
> - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED {%21})}
>
> #53 {@4: Sup: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#123); Ego: 53 - ETERNITY: YUNG (#200 -
> I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY {%8} / I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED
> PROPERTY {%8})}
>
> #12] {@5: Sup: 50 - VASTNESS / WASTING: T'ANG (#173 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO
> UNNATURAL LUST {%27}); Ego: 12 - YOUTHFULNESS: T'UNG (#212)}
>
> TELOS TOTAL: #212
> ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #373
> DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #347
>
> #344 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #373 as [#5, #50, #10, #20, #8, #200, #1, #50]
> = nikáō (G3528): {UMBRA: #881 % #41 = #20} 1) to conquer; 1a) to carry off
> the victory, come off victorious; 1a1) of Christ, victorious over all His
> foes; 1a2) of Christians, that hold fast their faith even unto *death*
> against the power of their foes, and temptations and persecutions; 1a3)
> when one is arraigned or goes to law, to win the case, maintain one's
> cause;
>
>