Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

24 Apr, 2024: Testing a new version of the Overboard here. If you have an issue post about it to rocksolid.nodes.help (I know. Everyone on Usenet has issues)

aus+uk / aus.legal / Re: private message

SubjectAuthor
* private messageMax
`* Re: private messageRod Speed
 `* Re: private messageMax
  `- Re: private messageRod Speed

1
private message

<skojil$1dus$1@gioia.aioe.org>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=4028&group=aus.legal#4028

  copy link   Newsgroups: aus.legal
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!JlFCL6lVhZ5rf6QIXhIVHQ.user.46.165.242.91.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: max...@val.morgan (Max)
Newsgroups: aus.legal
Subject: private message
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 19:21:37 +1100
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <skojil$1dus$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="47068"; posting-host="JlFCL6lVhZ5rf6QIXhIVHQ.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/78.14.0
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
Content-Language: en-GB
X-Mozilla-News-Host: snews://nttp.aioe.org:563
 by: Max - Wed, 20 Oct 2021 08:21 UTC

Could a private message on Whirlpool to another user be regarded as
defamation?

I would have thought it couldn't be, since it is the only that person
who sees the message.

Re: private message

<itb5bqFgi6vU1@mid.individual.net>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=4031&group=aus.legal#4031

  copy link   Newsgroups: aus.legal
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!lilly.ping.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: rod.spee...@gmail.com (Rod Speed)
Newsgroups: aus.legal
Subject: Re: private message
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 05:27:03 +1100
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <itb5bqFgi6vU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <skojil$1dus$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
format=flowed;
charset="utf-8";
reply-type=response
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net ifuPWEThLcGbWPXGEVdx2QlQJVRp7RgfDC/Us/crzAE+CV9A8=
Cancel-Lock: sha1:CN8fm1QCpNtSHQOyMUk1vu8cRzI=
In-Reply-To: <skojil$1dus$1@gioia.aioe.org>
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Importance: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416
 by: Rod Speed - Wed, 20 Oct 2021 18:27 UTC

Max <max@val.morgan> wrote

> Could a private message on Whirlpool to another user be regarded as
> defamation?

Nope, because it isn't actually private.

> I would have thought it couldn't be, since it is the only that person who
> sees the message.

That’s not true of Whirlpool.

Re: private message

<skq85c$t1k$1@gioia.aioe.org>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=4040&group=aus.legal#4040

  copy link   Newsgroups: aus.legal
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!JlFCL6lVhZ5rf6QIXhIVHQ.user.46.165.242.91.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: max...@val.morgan (Max)
Newsgroups: aus.legal
Subject: Re: private message
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 10:19:08 +1100
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <skq85c$t1k$1@gioia.aioe.org>
References: <skojil$1dus$1@gioia.aioe.org> <itb5bqFgi6vU1@mid.individual.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="29748"; posting-host="JlFCL6lVhZ5rf6QIXhIVHQ.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/78.14.0
Content-Language: en-GB
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
 by: Max - Wed, 20 Oct 2021 23:19 UTC

On 21/10/2021 5:27 am, Rod Speed wrote:
> Max <max@val.morgan> wrote
>
>> Could a private message on Whirlpool to another user be regarded as
>> defamation?
>
> Nope, because it isn't actually private.
>

If it was public then it would be defamation. If it's just private,
then I'm saying it couldn't be defamation because no one apart from the
person.

A private message on Whirlpool is private. No one else can see it. It is
not public.

>> I would have thought it couldn't be, since it is the only that person
>> who sees the message.
>
> That’s not true of Whirlpool.

Re: private message

<itbvo5Fl9lsU1@mid.individual.net>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=4048&group=aus.legal#4048

  copy link   Newsgroups: aus.legal
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!news.uzoreto.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: rod.spee...@gmail.com (Rod Speed)
Newsgroups: aus.legal
Subject: Re: private message
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 12:57:21 +1100
Lines: 37
Message-ID: <itbvo5Fl9lsU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <skojil$1dus$1@gioia.aioe.org> <itb5bqFgi6vU1@mid.individual.net> <skq85c$t1k$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
format=flowed;
charset="UTF-8";
reply-type=response
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net 1eTKuI0/qg/NWIp599sATwWM5RVuSrK38mNN8Npaa0jCJaO68=
Cancel-Lock: sha1:iDXLZ9v1IOaVRajwEEZLscD9S4k=
In-Reply-To: <skq85c$t1k$1@gioia.aioe.org>
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Importance: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416
 by: Rod Speed - Thu, 21 Oct 2021 01:57 UTC

Max <max@val.morgan> wrote
> Rod Speed wrote
>> Max <max@val.morgan> wrote

>>> Could a private message on Whirlpool to another user be regarded as
>>> defamation?

>> Nope, because it isn't actually private.

> If it was public then it would be defamation.

Can be anyway.

> If it's just private,

It isn't, regardless what what Whirlpool calls it.

> then I'm saying it couldn't be defamation because no one apart from the
> person.

You'd be wrong, as always.

> A private message on Whirlpool is private. No one else can see it.

That’s wrong on both counts.

> It is not public.

Separate matter entirely.

>>> I would have thought it couldn't be, since it is the only that person
>>> who sees the message.

>> That’s not true of Whirlpool.

That’s not true of Whirlpool "private" messages.

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.8
clearnet tor