Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

Put a rogue in the limelight and he will act like an honest man. -- Napoleon Bonaparte, "Maxims"


aus+uk / aus.legal / Re: Right to Privacy gone ?

SubjectAuthor
* Right to Privacy gone ?Phil Allison
+* Re: Right to Privacy gone ?Max
|`* Re: Right to Privacy gone ?Phil Allison
| `- Re: Right to Privacy gone ?Rod Speed
+* Re: Right to Privacy gone ?Rod Speed
|`* Re: Right to Privacy gone ?Phil Allison
| `- Re: Right to Privacy gone ?Rod Speed
+* Re: Right to Privacy gone ?Sylvia Else
|+* Re: Right to Privacy gone ?Phil Allison
||+* Re: Right to Privacy gone ?Phil Allison
|||+* Re: Right to Privacy gone ?Sylvia Else
||||`* Re: Right to Privacy gone ?Phil Allison
|||| +* Re: Right to Privacy gone ?Rod Speed
|||| |`* Re: Right to Privacy gone ?Phil Allison
|||| | `- Re: Right to Privacy gone ?Rod Speed
|||| `* Re: Right to Privacy gone ?F Murtz
||||  +* Re: Right to Privacy gone ?F Murtz
||||  |`- Re: Right to Privacy gone ?Rod Speed
||||  `- Re: Right to Privacy gone ?Rod Speed
|||`* Re: Right to Privacy gone ?Rod Speed
||| `* Re: Right to Privacy gone ?F Murtz
|||  `- Re: Right to Privacy gone ?Rod Speed
||`- Re: Right to Privacy gone ?Rod Speed
|`* Re: Right to Privacy gone ?Max
| +- Re: Right to Privacy gone ?Sylvia Else
| `- Re: Right to Privacy gone ?Rod Speed
+* Re: Right to Privacy gone ?Peter Jason
|`- Re: Right to Privacy gone ?Rod Speed
`* Re: Right to Privacy gone ?Sylvia Else
 `* Re: Right to Privacy gone ?Phil Allison
  `- Re: Right to Privacy gone ?Noodle

Pages:12
Right to Privacy gone ?

<ef317fa7-5250-4a95-b8a0-2e9c22695659n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=4632&group=aus.legal#4632

  copy link   Newsgroups: aus.legal
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:2c9:: with SMTP id a9mr28133574qtx.28.1637970814987;
Fri, 26 Nov 2021 15:53:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:2a11:: with SMTP id o17mr25252793qkp.253.1637970814831;
Fri, 26 Nov 2021 15:53:34 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: aus.legal
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2021 15:53:34 -0800 (PST)
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=124.168.117.197; posting-account=B_tJMAoAAAAmar-1r2H3x4CMhbFEou3n
NNTP-Posting-Host: 124.168.117.197
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <ef317fa7-5250-4a95-b8a0-2e9c22695659n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Right to Privacy gone ?
From: palliso...@gmail.com (Phil Allison)
Injection-Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2021 23:53:34 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 12
 by: Phil Allison - Fri, 26 Nov 2021 23:53 UTC

Hi,

those who have smart phones can use them to check-in at shops and other venues including poling stations.
While others have to complete a line on a paper register.
Full name and phone number.
All left open and visible to the next person.
Cannot be legal.

Discuss.

...... Phil

Re: Right to Privacy gone ?

<snrssf$1ieg$1@gioia.aioe.org>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=4633&group=aus.legal#4633

  copy link   Newsgroups: aus.legal
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!JlFCL6lVhZ5rf6QIXhIVHQ.user.46.165.242.91.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: max...@val.morgan (Max)
Newsgroups: aus.legal
Subject: Re: Right to Privacy gone ?
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2021 11:07:44 +1100
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <snrssf$1ieg$1@gioia.aioe.org>
References: <ef317fa7-5250-4a95-b8a0-2e9c22695659n@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="51664"; posting-host="JlFCL6lVhZ5rf6QIXhIVHQ.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/91.3.2
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
 by: Max - Sat, 27 Nov 2021 00:07 UTC

On 27/11/2021 10:53 am, Phil Allison wrote:
> Hi,
>
> those who have smart phones can use them to check-in at shops and other venues including poling stations.
> While others have to complete a line on a paper register.
> Full name and phone number.
> All left open and visible to the next person.
> Cannot be legal.
>
> Discuss.
>

I put my first name and then only the initial of my last name, plus
phone number, as I have seen other people do.

This is at places where there is no phone signal.

Re: Right to Privacy gone ?

<e20118d1-a6a3-4793-9ef6-7eb896e350fbn@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=4635&group=aus.legal#4635

  copy link   Newsgroups: aus.legal
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:7dcd:: with SMTP id c13mr28375307qte.133.1637972440536;
Fri, 26 Nov 2021 16:20:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:4452:: with SMTP id w18mr17958764qkp.625.1637972440412;
Fri, 26 Nov 2021 16:20:40 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: aus.legal
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2021 16:20:40 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <snrssf$1ieg$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=124.168.117.197; posting-account=B_tJMAoAAAAmar-1r2H3x4CMhbFEou3n
NNTP-Posting-Host: 124.168.117.197
References: <ef317fa7-5250-4a95-b8a0-2e9c22695659n@googlegroups.com> <snrssf$1ieg$1@gioia.aioe.org>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <e20118d1-a6a3-4793-9ef6-7eb896e350fbn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Right to Privacy gone ?
From: palliso...@gmail.com (Phil Allison)
Injection-Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2021 00:20:40 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 24
 by: Phil Allison - Sat, 27 Nov 2021 00:20 UTC

Max the TRoll wrote:
=======
> >
> > those who have smart phones can use them to check-in at shops and other venues including poling stations.
> > While others have to complete a line on a paper register.
> > Full name and phone number.
> > All left open and visible to the next person.
> > Cannot be legal.
> >
> > Discuss.
> >
> I put my first name and then only the initial of my last name, plus
> phone number, as I have seen other people do.

** OK.

> This is at places where there is no phone signal.

** Interesting.

But got SFA to do with my question.

Re: Right to Privacy gone ?

<j0di83FcmtsU1@mid.individual.net>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=4636&group=aus.legal#4636

  copy link   Newsgroups: aus.legal
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!news.uzoreto.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: rod.spee...@gmail.com (Rod Speed)
Newsgroups: aus.legal
Subject: Re: Right to Privacy gone ?
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2021 13:07:59 +1100
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <j0di83FcmtsU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <ef317fa7-5250-4a95-b8a0-2e9c22695659n@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
format=flowed;
charset="UTF-8";
reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net /wPRWSHFI/9JnWebvP02pAtc/R14b5qyzCRN2QCR3KYMA+1ME=
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Aktv8Mdo6HPdJl0rf5uZisFYEYY=
In-Reply-To: <ef317fa7-5250-4a95-b8a0-2e9c22695659n@googlegroups.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Importance: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416
 by: Rod Speed - Sat, 27 Nov 2021 02:07 UTC

Phil Allison <pallison49@gmail.com> wrote

> those who have smart phones can use them to check-in
> at shops and other venues including poling stations.

A surprising number don’t bother. Woolys did have one of the
staff check that you had checked in, but I only saw it the once.
I don’t shop very often so its not clear how often they did that.

> While others have to complete a line on a paper register.
> Full name and phone number.
> All left open and visible to the next person.
> Cannot be legal.

Corse its legal, in fact its legally required.

> Discuss.

Get fucked.

Re: Right to Privacy gone ?

<b8d90941-3355-4aa3-8784-89d0f0111e9fn@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=4638&group=aus.legal#4638

  copy link   Newsgroups: aus.legal
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:4107:: with SMTP id kc7mr28707758qvb.57.1637979273086;
Fri, 26 Nov 2021 18:14:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a37:de09:: with SMTP id h9mr17817725qkj.764.1637979272919;
Fri, 26 Nov 2021 18:14:32 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: aus.legal
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2021 18:14:32 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <j0di83FcmtsU1@mid.individual.net>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=124.168.117.197; posting-account=B_tJMAoAAAAmar-1r2H3x4CMhbFEou3n
NNTP-Posting-Host: 124.168.117.197
References: <ef317fa7-5250-4a95-b8a0-2e9c22695659n@googlegroups.com> <j0di83FcmtsU1@mid.individual.net>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <b8d90941-3355-4aa3-8784-89d0f0111e9fn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Right to Privacy gone ?
From: palliso...@gmail.com (Phil Allison)
Injection-Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2021 02:14:33 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 15
 by: Phil Allison - Sat, 27 Nov 2021 02:14 UTC

Rodbot Ex- Speed Cop Fucking Asshole wrote:

> > While others have to complete a line on a paper register.
> > Full name and phone number.
> > All left open and visible to the next person.
> > Cannot be legal.
>
> Corse its legal, in fact its legally required.

** ROTFLMAO - wot utter bullshit !!

Required to leave you name a phone number for all to see ????

....... Phil

Re: Right to Privacy gone ?

<j0dikbFcp2bU1@mid.individual.net>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=4639&group=aus.legal#4639

  copy link   Newsgroups: aus.legal
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!news.uzoreto.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: syl...@email.invalid (Sylvia Else)
Newsgroups: aus.legal
Subject: Re: Right to Privacy gone ?
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2021 13:14:34 +1100
Lines: 32
Message-ID: <j0dikbFcp2bU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <ef317fa7-5250-4a95-b8a0-2e9c22695659n@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net 1ipF48JAj3OalhDkBjUnawU0Yuj14NO2qRpApEDPW+qKpjmLnV
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ih3Ljg91N+4yTlPZQO8ddGy9GLg=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/91.3.2
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <ef317fa7-5250-4a95-b8a0-2e9c22695659n@googlegroups.com>
 by: Sylvia Else - Sat, 27 Nov 2021 02:14 UTC

On 27-Nov-21 10:53 am, Phil Allison wrote:
> Hi,
>
> those who have smart phones can use them to check-in at shops and other venues including poling stations.
> While others have to complete a line on a paper register.
> Full name and phone number.
> All left open and visible to the next person.
> Cannot be legal.
>
> Discuss.
>
>
>
> ..... Phil
>

You can provide an email address instead of your phone number, and use
an email address created specifically for this purpose.

https://gazette.legislation.nsw.gov.au/so/download.w3p?id=Gazette_2021_2021-505.pdf

Schedule 6 Dictionary

contact details, for a person visiting or entering premises, means—
(a) the person’s name, and
(b) the person’s telephone number or email address, and
(c) the time at which the person entered the premises.

Of course, there's little to stop you from providing fake details, and
very little chance of getting prosecuted for it.

Sylvia.

Re: Right to Privacy gone ?

<j0din3FcpliU1@mid.individual.net>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=4640&group=aus.legal#4640

  copy link   Newsgroups: aus.legal
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!news.uzoreto.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: rod.spee...@gmail.com (Rod Speed)
Newsgroups: aus.legal
Subject: Re: Right to Privacy gone ?
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2021 13:15:59 +1100
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <j0din3FcpliU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <ef317fa7-5250-4a95-b8a0-2e9c22695659n@googlegroups.com> <snrssf$1ieg$1@gioia.aioe.org> <e20118d1-a6a3-4793-9ef6-7eb896e350fbn@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
format=flowed;
charset="UTF-8";
reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net rSBhPcWfU5N4ro3j3a0wRQnOH0oU6MfuWM9KiCYu2wkIpIVBI=
Cancel-Lock: sha1:nMnCodtubYy+J6LSbgagimrD4vM=
In-Reply-To: <e20118d1-a6a3-4793-9ef6-7eb896e350fbn@googlegroups.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Importance: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416
 by: Rod Speed - Sat, 27 Nov 2021 02:15 UTC

Phil Allison <pallison49@gmail.com> wrote
> Max wrote

>>> those who have smart phones can use them to check-in
>>> at shops and other venues including poling stations.
>>> While others have to complete a line on a paper register.
>>> Full name and phone number.

Not legally required to be the full name.
Just says contact details.

>>> All left open and visible to the next person.
>>> Cannot be legal.

>> I put my first name and then only the initial of my last name,
>> plus phone number, as I have seen other people do.
> OK.
>> This is at places where there is no phone signal.

Most of the garage sales who bother with a checking do it that way.
> Interesting.
> But got SFA to do with my question.

Your question is completely irrelevant, as always.

Re: Right to Privacy gone ?

<9537282a-b090-4917-83b1-acad4bee90e0n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=4642&group=aus.legal#4642

  copy link   Newsgroups: aus.legal
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:28d0:: with SMTP id l16mr26425007qkp.500.1637979581481;
Fri, 26 Nov 2021 18:19:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a37:813:: with SMTP id 19mr16839310qki.729.1637979581357;
Fri, 26 Nov 2021 18:19:41 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: aus.legal
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2021 18:19:41 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <j0dikbFcp2bU1@mid.individual.net>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=124.168.117.197; posting-account=B_tJMAoAAAAmar-1r2H3x4CMhbFEou3n
NNTP-Posting-Host: 124.168.117.197
References: <ef317fa7-5250-4a95-b8a0-2e9c22695659n@googlegroups.com> <j0dikbFcp2bU1@mid.individual.net>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <9537282a-b090-4917-83b1-acad4bee90e0n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Right to Privacy gone ?
From: palliso...@gmail.com (Phil Allison)
Injection-Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2021 02:19:41 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lines: 39
 by: Phil Allison - Sat, 27 Nov 2021 02:19 UTC

Sylvia Else wrote:
=============> >
> > those who have smart phones can use them to check-in at shops and other venues including poling stations.
> > While others have to complete a line on a paper register.
> > Full name and phone number.
> > All left open and visible to the next person.
> > Cannot be legal.
> >
> > Discuss.
> >
> >
>
> You can provide an email address instead of your phone number,
>

** That every bit as bad.

> and use
> an email address created specifically for this purpose.

** That sounds better.

>
> contact details, for a person visiting or entering premises, means—
> (a) the person’s name, and
> (b) the person’s telephone number or email address, and
> (c) the time at which the person entered the premises.
>
> Of course, there's little to stop you from providing fake details, and
> very little chance of getting prosecuted for it.

** Not a legal alternative.

.... Phil

Re: Right to Privacy gone ?

<f5e3c49f-0ec2-49c8-bab7-6e139730bef6n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=4643&group=aus.legal#4643

  copy link   Newsgroups: aus.legal
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:2a05:: with SMTP id o5mr18212547qkp.527.1637980629482;
Fri, 26 Nov 2021 18:37:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5883:: with SMTP id t3mr19941222qta.551.1637980629353;
Fri, 26 Nov 2021 18:37:09 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: aus.legal
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2021 18:37:09 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <9537282a-b090-4917-83b1-acad4bee90e0n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=124.168.117.197; posting-account=B_tJMAoAAAAmar-1r2H3x4CMhbFEou3n
NNTP-Posting-Host: 124.168.117.197
References: <ef317fa7-5250-4a95-b8a0-2e9c22695659n@googlegroups.com>
<j0dikbFcp2bU1@mid.individual.net> <9537282a-b090-4917-83b1-acad4bee90e0n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <f5e3c49f-0ec2-49c8-bab7-6e139730bef6n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Right to Privacy gone ?
From: palliso...@gmail.com (Phil Allison)
Injection-Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2021 02:37:09 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 16
 by: Phil Allison - Sat, 27 Nov 2021 02:37 UTC

Phil Allison wrote:
================
>>
> > You can provide an email address instead of your phone number,

** See pdf of actual form:

https://www.nsw.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-09/COVID-19-record-of-visitors-at-premises-form.pdf

Several differing forms are in use - the above seems to be the newest.

IME almost nobody uses the email alternative.

...... Phil

Re: Right to Privacy gone ?

<sns6is$fuq$1@gioia.aioe.org>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=4645&group=aus.legal#4645

  copy link   Newsgroups: aus.legal
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!JlFCL6lVhZ5rf6QIXhIVHQ.user.46.165.242.91.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: max...@val.morgan (Max)
Newsgroups: aus.legal
Subject: Re: Right to Privacy gone ?
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2021 13:53:16 +1100
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <sns6is$fuq$1@gioia.aioe.org>
References: <ef317fa7-5250-4a95-b8a0-2e9c22695659n@googlegroups.com>
<j0dikbFcp2bU1@mid.individual.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="16346"; posting-host="JlFCL6lVhZ5rf6QIXhIVHQ.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/91.3.2
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
 by: Max - Sat, 27 Nov 2021 02:53 UTC

On 27/11/2021 1:14 pm, Sylvia Else wrote:
> On 27-Nov-21 10:53 am, Phil Allison wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> those who have smart phones can use them to check-in at shops and
>> other venues including poling stations.
>> While others have to complete a line on a paper register.
>> Full name and phone number.
>> All left open and visible to the next person.
>> Cannot be legal.
>>
>> Discuss.
>>
>>
>>
>> .....  Phil
>>
>
> You can provide an email address instead of your phone number, and use
> an email address created specifically for this purpose.
>
> https://gazette.legislation.nsw.gov.au/so/download.w3p?id=Gazette_2021_2021-505.pdf
>
>
> Schedule 6 Dictionary
>
> contact details, for a person visiting or entering premises, means—
> (a) the person’s name, and
> (b) the person’s telephone number or email address, and
> (c) the time at which the person entered the premises.
>
> Of course, there's little to stop you from providing fake details, and
> very little chance of getting prosecuted for it.
>

Why take any risk like that in getting jail time?

Re: Right to Privacy gone ?

<j0dl5jFd79jU1@mid.individual.net>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=4646&group=aus.legal#4646

  copy link   Newsgroups: aus.legal
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!lilly.ping.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: rod.spee...@gmail.com (Rod Speed)
Newsgroups: aus.legal
Subject: Re: Right to Privacy gone ?
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2021 13:57:51 +1100
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <j0dl5jFd79jU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <ef317fa7-5250-4a95-b8a0-2e9c22695659n@googlegroups.com> <j0di83FcmtsU1@mid.individual.net> <b8d90941-3355-4aa3-8784-89d0f0111e9fn@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
format=flowed;
charset="UTF-8";
reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net aGjDvIh53oTRHVH0CZHykwWSTTC/DczdBDEab0AxKaMBMCIbg=
Cancel-Lock: sha1:RTLs2oNUT8DbLpgiHMOI7AbtdO4=
In-Reply-To: <b8d90941-3355-4aa3-8784-89d0f0111e9fn@googlegroups.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Importance: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416
 by: Rod Speed - Sat, 27 Nov 2021 02:57 UTC

Phil Allison <pallison49@gmail.com> wrote
> Rod Speed wrote

>>> While others have to complete a line on a paper register.
>>> Full name and phone number.

No full name required, just contact details.

>>> All left open and visible to the next person.
>>> Cannot be legal.

>> Corse its legal, in fact its legally required.

> ROTFLMAO - wot utter bullshit !!

Fact actually.

> Required to leave you name a phone number for all to see ????

Required to provide contact details, fuckwit.

And doesn’t have to be for all to see either, they are welcome
to have a monkey record your contact details and for no one
to be able to see that except the monkey and Service NSW
if it turns out that an infected person had been there when
you were.

Re: Right to Privacy gone ?

<j0dl5lFd6l8U1@mid.individual.net>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=4647&group=aus.legal#4647

  copy link   Newsgroups: aus.legal
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.goja.nl.eu.org!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: syl...@email.invalid (Sylvia Else)
Newsgroups: aus.legal
Subject: Re: Right to Privacy gone ?
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2021 13:57:57 +1100
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <j0dl5lFd6l8U1@mid.individual.net>
References: <ef317fa7-5250-4a95-b8a0-2e9c22695659n@googlegroups.com>
<j0dikbFcp2bU1@mid.individual.net>
<9537282a-b090-4917-83b1-acad4bee90e0n@googlegroups.com>
<f5e3c49f-0ec2-49c8-bab7-6e139730bef6n@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net QZtcBeoOE5KuLLYMgmiSWQh2o1wyElGzhVDJ+t6QwvjVog1yDM
Cancel-Lock: sha1:+x6WXHX5QwE7eJCb3YoPH2SVVRg=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/91.3.2
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <f5e3c49f-0ec2-49c8-bab7-6e139730bef6n@googlegroups.com>
 by: Sylvia Else - Sat, 27 Nov 2021 02:57 UTC

On 27-Nov-21 1:37 pm, Phil Allison wrote:
> Phil Allison wrote:
> ================
>>>
>>> You can provide an email address instead of your phone number,
>
> ** See pdf of actual form:
>
> https://www.nsw.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-09/COVID-19-record-of-visitors-at-premises-form.pdf
>
> Several differing forms are in use - the above seems to be the newest.
>
> IME almost nobody uses the email alternative.
>

Typically, writing down a phone number takes less effort.

I think the only time most people are concerned about privacy is after a
lack of it has come back to bite them. Which is to say, when it's too late.

Sylvia.

Re: Right to Privacy gone ?

<j0dld5Fd8hlU1@mid.individual.net>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=4649&group=aus.legal#4649

  copy link   Newsgroups: aus.legal
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!news.uzoreto.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: syl...@email.invalid (Sylvia Else)
Newsgroups: aus.legal
Subject: Re: Right to Privacy gone ?
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2021 14:01:56 +1100
Lines: 43
Message-ID: <j0dld5Fd8hlU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <ef317fa7-5250-4a95-b8a0-2e9c22695659n@googlegroups.com>
<j0dikbFcp2bU1@mid.individual.net> <sns6is$fuq$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net r5rQThJ4fVrHIWAlLTp++APIJBQRW/huCUzhPBoUVFAT0UG/dp
Cancel-Lock: sha1:4eNCXo8QRWStrCKcGp5IWOgvt+8=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/91.3.2
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <sns6is$fuq$1@gioia.aioe.org>
 by: Sylvia Else - Sat, 27 Nov 2021 03:01 UTC

On 27-Nov-21 1:53 pm, Max wrote:
> On 27/11/2021 1:14 pm, Sylvia Else wrote:
>> On 27-Nov-21 10:53 am, Phil Allison wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> those who have smart phones can use them to check-in at shops and
>>> other venues including poling stations.
>>> While others have to complete a line on a paper register.
>>> Full name and phone number.
>>> All left open and visible to the next person.
>>> Cannot be legal.
>>>
>>> Discuss.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> .....  Phil
>>>
>>
>> You can provide an email address instead of your phone number, and use
>> an email address created specifically for this purpose.
>>
>> https://gazette.legislation.nsw.gov.au/so/download.w3p?id=Gazette_2021_2021-505.pdf
>>
>>
>> Schedule 6 Dictionary
>>
>> contact details, for a person visiting or entering premises, means—
>> (a) the person’s name, and
>> (b) the person’s telephone number or email address, and
>> (c) the time at which the person entered the premises.
>>
>> Of course, there's little to stop you from providing fake details, and
>> very little chance of getting prosecuted for it.
>>
>
> Why take any risk like that in getting jail time?

One could ask the same question about any offence where the gain from
successful commission of the offence is negligible. People still commit
offences.

Sylvia.

Re: Right to Privacy gone ?

<j0dlgcFd93sU1@mid.individual.net>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=4651&group=aus.legal#4651

  copy link   Newsgroups: aus.legal
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!news.uzoreto.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: rod.spee...@gmail.com (Rod Speed)
Newsgroups: aus.legal
Subject: Re: Right to Privacy gone ?
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2021 14:03:36 +1100
Lines: 32
Message-ID: <j0dlgcFd93sU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <ef317fa7-5250-4a95-b8a0-2e9c22695659n@googlegroups.com> <j0dikbFcp2bU1@mid.individual.net> <9537282a-b090-4917-83b1-acad4bee90e0n@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
format=flowed;
charset="UTF-8";
reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net wyUfmPqhgUsQZs+haCga7Qfvlh8E7bPf03Hh5ueokN9udzlWo=
Cancel-Lock: sha1:/WxoOJXx7FQ3hPxRHJOoA7hQVTQ=
In-Reply-To: <9537282a-b090-4917-83b1-acad4bee90e0n@googlegroups.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Importance: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416
 by: Rod Speed - Sat, 27 Nov 2021 03:03 UTC

Phil Allison <pallison49@gmail.com> wrote
> Sylvia Else wrote

>> > those who have smart phones can use them to check-in at shops and other
>> > venues including poling stations.
>> > While others have to complete a line on a paper register.
>> > Full name and phone number.
>> > All left open and visible to the next person.
>> > Cannot be legal.

>> You can provide an email address instead of your phone number,

> That every bit as bad.

Bullshit with one you create for that purpose.

>> and use an email address created specifically for this purpose.

> That sounds better.

>> contact details, for a person visiting or entering premises, means—
>> (a) the person’s name, and
>> (b) the person’s telephone number or email address, and
>> (c) the time at which the person entered the premises.
>>
>> Of course, there's little to stop you from providing fake
>> details, and very little chance of getting prosecuted for it.

> Not a legal alternative.

Irrelevant.

Re: Right to Privacy gone ?

<j0dljrFd9nhU1@mid.individual.net>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=4652&group=aus.legal#4652

  copy link   Newsgroups: aus.legal
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.goja.nl.eu.org!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: rod.spee...@gmail.com (Rod Speed)
Newsgroups: aus.legal
Subject: Re: Right to Privacy gone ?
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2021 14:05:27 +1100
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <j0dljrFd9nhU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <ef317fa7-5250-4a95-b8a0-2e9c22695659n@googlegroups.com> <j0dikbFcp2bU1@mid.individual.net> <9537282a-b090-4917-83b1-acad4bee90e0n@googlegroups.com> <f5e3c49f-0ec2-49c8-bab7-6e139730bef6n@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
format=flowed;
charset="UTF-8";
reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net VjlzbRRfVJppNulYxX//MQkeY71aS/KI6IH70Pev/gMv4gc4E=
Cancel-Lock: sha1:f8F+XfnTwFbgGKK0Y8Bd2dNdumo=
In-Reply-To: <f5e3c49f-0ec2-49c8-bab7-6e139730bef6n@googlegroups.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Importance: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416
 by: Rod Speed - Sat, 27 Nov 2021 03:05 UTC

Phil Allison <pallison49@gmail.com> wrote
> Phil Allison wrote

>>> You can provide an email address instead of your phone number,

> See pdf of actual form:

> https://www.nsw.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-09/COVID-19-record-of-visitors-at-premises-form.pdf

> Several differing forms are in use - the above seems to be the newest.

> IME almost nobody uses the email alternative.

Irrelevant, its allowed anyway.

Re: Right to Privacy gone ?

<8f36ced2-10c1-444f-a88b-c6b2c007cec5n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=4653&group=aus.legal#4653

  copy link   Newsgroups: aus.legal
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:4a0e:: with SMTP id x14mr29489723qtq.345.1637982628991;
Fri, 26 Nov 2021 19:10:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:509a:: with SMTP id kk26mr29690509qvb.43.1637982628888;
Fri, 26 Nov 2021 19:10:28 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: aus.legal
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2021 19:10:28 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <j0dl5lFd6l8U1@mid.individual.net>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=124.168.117.197; posting-account=B_tJMAoAAAAmar-1r2H3x4CMhbFEou3n
NNTP-Posting-Host: 124.168.117.197
References: <ef317fa7-5250-4a95-b8a0-2e9c22695659n@googlegroups.com>
<j0dikbFcp2bU1@mid.individual.net> <9537282a-b090-4917-83b1-acad4bee90e0n@googlegroups.com>
<f5e3c49f-0ec2-49c8-bab7-6e139730bef6n@googlegroups.com> <j0dl5lFd6l8U1@mid.individual.net>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <8f36ced2-10c1-444f-a88b-c6b2c007cec5n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Right to Privacy gone ?
From: palliso...@gmail.com (Phil Allison)
Injection-Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2021 03:10:28 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 34
 by: Phil Allison - Sat, 27 Nov 2021 03:10 UTC

Sylvia Else wrote:
==============
>>>
> >>> You can provide an email address instead of your phone number,
> >
> > ** See pdf of actual form:
> >
> > https://www.nsw.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-09/COVID-19-record-of-visitors-at-premises-form.pdf
> >
> > Several differing forms are in use - the above seems to be the newest.
> >
> > IME almost nobody uses the email alternative.
>
> >
>
> Typically, writing down a phone number takes less effort.
> I think the only time most people are concerned about privacy is after a
> lack of it has come back to bite them. Which is to say, when it's too late.

** Too true.

Scenario:

Pretty young thing fills in form with her mobile number - while being watched by a male admirer/stalker.
Same young thing uses her email - stalker tracks her down on the internet using it in a search engine.

Swap young thing for someone in public life.
Get the idea?

The safer way to do this is with a tablet PC owned by the venue
where a staffer keys in the info and then it disappears into a locked data base

....... Phil

Re: Right to Privacy gone ?

<j0dm5uFdcrqU1@mid.individual.net>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=4656&group=aus.legal#4656

  copy link   Newsgroups: aus.legal
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!lilly.ping.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: rod.spee...@gmail.com (Rod Speed)
Newsgroups: aus.legal
Subject: Re: Right to Privacy gone ?
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2021 14:15:06 +1100
Lines: 39
Message-ID: <j0dm5uFdcrqU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <ef317fa7-5250-4a95-b8a0-2e9c22695659n@googlegroups.com> <j0dikbFcp2bU1@mid.individual.net> <sns6is$fuq$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
format=flowed;
charset="UTF-8";
reply-type=response
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net mJXEHxm33IwO2dcpf+GD3Qtj6rDOMcCln6m4qW5DkJ6szwmM0=
Cancel-Lock: sha1:tob3iPl5GcLrMlMHamyU5hlD9/w=
In-Reply-To: <sns6is$fuq$1@gioia.aioe.org>
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Importance: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416
 by: Rod Speed - Sat, 27 Nov 2021 03:15 UTC

Max <max@val.morgan> wrote
> Sylvia Else wrote
>> Phil Allison wrote

>>> those who have smart phones can use them to check-in at shops and other
>>> venues including poling stations.
>>> While others have to complete a line on a paper register.
>>> Full name and phone number.
>>> All left open and visible to the next person.
>>> Cannot be legal.
>>>
>>> Discuss.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ..... Phil
>>>
>>
>> You can provide an email address instead of your phone number, and use an
>> email address created specifically for this purpose.
>>
>> https://gazette.legislation.nsw.gov.au/so/download.w3p?id=Gazette_2021_2021-505.pdf
>> Schedule 6 Dictionary
>>
>> contact details, for a person visiting or entering premises, means—
>> (a) the person’s name, and
>> (b) the person’s telephone number or email address, and
>> (c) the time at which the person entered the premises.
>>
>> Of course, there's little to stop you from providing fake details, and
>> very little chance of getting prosecuted for it.
>>
>
> Why take any risk like that in getting jail time?

Some are stupid enough to not want to be tracked.

There is no risk of getting caught and you wouldn’t get jail time anyway.

Re: Right to Privacy gone ?

<j0dmi3FdfncU1@mid.individual.net>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=4657&group=aus.legal#4657

  copy link   Newsgroups: aus.legal
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!news.uzoreto.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: rod.spee...@gmail.com (Rod Speed)
Newsgroups: aus.legal
Subject: Re: Right to Privacy gone ?
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2021 14:21:35 +1100
Lines: 46
Message-ID: <j0dmi3FdfncU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <ef317fa7-5250-4a95-b8a0-2e9c22695659n@googlegroups.com> <j0dikbFcp2bU1@mid.individual.net> <9537282a-b090-4917-83b1-acad4bee90e0n@googlegroups.com> <f5e3c49f-0ec2-49c8-bab7-6e139730bef6n@googlegroups.com> <j0dl5lFd6l8U1@mid.individual.net> <8f36ced2-10c1-444f-a88b-c6b2c007cec5n@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
format=flowed;
charset="UTF-8";
reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net 6Dp+q763RXXF3hIWS/9y/wU/IYZz1zERHDoNb3ypvqZP8ApU8=
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Ag29r6HfqxMwwaM75xcItWBswLg=
In-Reply-To: <8f36ced2-10c1-444f-a88b-c6b2c007cec5n@googlegroups.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Importance: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416
 by: Rod Speed - Sat, 27 Nov 2021 03:21 UTC

Phil Allison <pallison49@gmail.com> wrote
> Sylvia Else wrote

>> >>> You can provide an email address instead of your phone number,
>> >
>> > See pdf of actual form:
>> >
>> > https://www.nsw.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-09/COVID-19-record-of-visitors-at-premises-form.pdf
>> >
>> > Several differing forms are in use - the above seems to be the newest.
>> >
>> > IME almost nobody uses the email alternative.
>>
>> >
>>
>> Typically, writing down a phone number takes less effort.
>> I think the only time most people are concerned about privacy is after a
>> lack of it has come back to bite them. Which is to say, when it's too
>> late.

> Too true.

But trivially avoidable.

> Scenario:

> Pretty young thing fills in form with her mobile number
> - while being watched by a male admirer/stalker.
> Same young thing uses her email - stalker tracks
> her down on the internet using it in a search engine.

Trivially avoidable by using a unique email for checkins.

> Swap young thing for someone in public life.
> Get the idea?

Trivially avoidable by using the QR code.

> The safer way to do this is with a tablet PC owned
> by the venue where a staffer keys in the info and
> then it disappears into a locked data base

Even safer to use the QR code so even the
store monkey never gets any of your details
and so cant memorise the contact info.

Re: Right to Privacy gone ?

<f1d574f6-3fd4-43d7-833b-17abec1fcb61n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=4658&group=aus.legal#4658

  copy link   Newsgroups: aus.legal
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:d84:: with SMTP id e4mr17086196qve.128.1637983845342;
Fri, 26 Nov 2021 19:30:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:ad4:59c5:: with SMTP id el5mr28312610qvb.65.1637983845162;
Fri, 26 Nov 2021 19:30:45 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: aus.legal
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2021 19:30:44 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <j0dmi3FdfncU1@mid.individual.net>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=124.168.117.197; posting-account=B_tJMAoAAAAmar-1r2H3x4CMhbFEou3n
NNTP-Posting-Host: 124.168.117.197
References: <ef317fa7-5250-4a95-b8a0-2e9c22695659n@googlegroups.com>
<j0dikbFcp2bU1@mid.individual.net> <9537282a-b090-4917-83b1-acad4bee90e0n@googlegroups.com>
<f5e3c49f-0ec2-49c8-bab7-6e139730bef6n@googlegroups.com> <j0dl5lFd6l8U1@mid.individual.net>
<8f36ced2-10c1-444f-a88b-c6b2c007cec5n@googlegroups.com> <j0dmi3FdfncU1@mid.individual.net>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <f1d574f6-3fd4-43d7-833b-17abec1fcb61n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Right to Privacy gone ?
From: palliso...@gmail.com (Phil Allison)
Injection-Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2021 03:30:45 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 47
 by: Phil Allison - Sat, 27 Nov 2021 03:30 UTC

Rodbot Ex- Speed Co ARSEHOLE wrote:
=============================

> >> >
> >> > See pdf of actual form:
> >> >
> >> > https://www.nsw.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-09/COVID-19-record-of-visitors-at-premises-form.pdf
> >> >
> >> > Several differing forms are in use - the above seems to be the newest.
> >> >
> >> > IME almost nobody uses the email alternative.
> >>
> >>
> >> Typically, writing down a phone number takes less effort.
> >> I think the only time most people are concerned about privacy is after a
> >> lack of it has come back to bite them. Which is to say, when it's too
> >> late.
> > Too true.
>
> But trivially avoidable.

** Totally beside the point - you arsehole.

> > Scenario:
>
> > Pretty young thing fills in form with her mobile number
> > - while being watched by a male admirer/stalker.
> > Same young thing uses her email - stalker tracks
> > her down on the internet using it in a search engine.

> Trivially avoidable by using a unique email for checkins.

** Totally beside the point - you arsehole.

> > Swap young thing for someone in public life.
> > Get the idea?
> Trivially avoidable by using the QR code.

** Totally beside the point - you arsehole .

> > The safer way to do this is with a tablet PC owned
> > by the venue where a staffer keys in the info and
> > then it disappears into a locked data base

...... Phil

Re: Right to Privacy gone ?

<j0dnoaFdlu5U1@mid.individual.net>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=4659&group=aus.legal#4659

  copy link   Newsgroups: aus.legal
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!lilly.ping.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: rod.spee...@gmail.com (Rod Speed)
Newsgroups: aus.legal
Subject: Re: Right to Privacy gone ?
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2021 14:41:58 +1100
Lines: 4
Message-ID: <j0dnoaFdlu5U1@mid.individual.net>
References: <ef317fa7-5250-4a95-b8a0-2e9c22695659n@googlegroups.com> <j0dikbFcp2bU1@mid.individual.net> <9537282a-b090-4917-83b1-acad4bee90e0n@googlegroups.com> <f5e3c49f-0ec2-49c8-bab7-6e139730bef6n@googlegroups.com> <j0dl5lFd6l8U1@mid.individual.net> <8f36ced2-10c1-444f-a88b-c6b2c007cec5n@googlegroups.com> <j0dmi3FdfncU1@mid.individual.net> <f1d574f6-3fd4-43d7-833b-17abec1fcb61n@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
format=flowed;
charset="UTF-8";
reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net cDS3oUXXpsoHva2mQkZ4EgBmEDw2Qo3BVLeVIqIz5KtC+qnx0=
Cancel-Lock: sha1:3VZAucqnqy7mpn6BsvxHm19CFhg=
In-Reply-To: <f1d574f6-3fd4-43d7-833b-17abec1fcb61n@googlegroups.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Importance: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416
 by: Rod Speed - Sat, 27 Nov 2021 03:41 UTC

Some fuckwit claiming to be Filthy Phil
shitted the shit it always shits when its got
done like a fucking dinner, as it always is.

Re: Right to Privacy gone ?

<a9p7qg57hip9cj8c8b3hf5e1io0gcufkb0@4ax.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=4673&group=aus.legal#4673

  copy link   Newsgroups: aus.legal
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: pj...@jostle.com (Peter Jason)
Newsgroups: aus.legal
Subject: Re: Right to Privacy gone ?
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 07:28:56 +1100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <a9p7qg57hip9cj8c8b3hf5e1io0gcufkb0@4ax.com>
References: <ef317fa7-5250-4a95-b8a0-2e9c22695659n@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="33260bc1a2a4f8e758087d539f2ccfea";
logging-data="15368"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19dxIFCrxPM0JaqpYsfty81"
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
Cancel-Lock: sha1:quljWctu3/qzGf45CE36dQUydlI=
 by: Peter Jason - Sun, 28 Nov 2021 20:28 UTC

On Fri, 26 Nov 2021 15:53:34 -0800 (PST), Phil Allison
<pallison49@gmail.com> wrote:

>Hi,
>
>those who have smart phones can use them to check-in at shops and other venues including poling stations.
>While others have to complete a line on a paper register.
>Full name and phone number.
>All left open and visible to the next person.
>Cannot be legal.
>
>Discuss.
>
>
>
>..... Phil

I was thrown out of a hardware store on Saturday because they "don't
have sign-in sheets", just a QR code page. Of course I don't carry a
mobile gizmo around with me so I was stuffed.

Also, at work I have the whole TELSTRA D.O.T. system, with phones (4
extensions) unlimited bandwidth, all costing $90.00/month, yet they
REFUSE to link a mobile phone to it. Sheer brigandage.

Re: Right to Privacy gone ?

<j0igs3Fb36pU1@mid.individual.net>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=4674&group=aus.legal#4674

  copy link   Newsgroups: aus.legal
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!lilly.ping.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: rod.spee...@gmail.com (Rod Speed)
Newsgroups: aus.legal
Subject: Re: Right to Privacy gone ?
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 10:15:11 +1100
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <j0igs3Fb36pU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <ef317fa7-5250-4a95-b8a0-2e9c22695659n@googlegroups.com> <a9p7qg57hip9cj8c8b3hf5e1io0gcufkb0@4ax.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
format=flowed;
charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net Wwt5MDks18b3cpNqQaSTGA0TzPXFQe+iLi3iiS7zRtjwjpuCI=
Cancel-Lock: sha1:9x/qnresGYTJEL3WJK7/oL2KUSQ=
In-Reply-To: <a9p7qg57hip9cj8c8b3hf5e1io0gcufkb0@4ax.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Importance: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416
 by: Rod Speed - Sun, 28 Nov 2021 23:15 UTC

Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> wrote
> Phil Allison <pallison49@gmail.com> wrote

>>those who have smart phones can use them to check-in at shops and other
>>venues including poling stations.
>>While others have to complete a line on a paper register.
>>Full name and phone number.
>>All left open and visible to the next person.
>>Cannot be legal.
>>
>>Discuss.

> I was thrown out of a hardware store on Saturday because
> they "don't have sign-in sheets", just a QR code page. Of
> course I don't carry a mobile gizmo around with me

More fool you.

> so I was stuffed.

And so you should be, you dinosaur.

> Also, at work I have the whole TELSTRA D.O.T. system, with phones
> (4 extensions) unlimited bandwidth, all costing $90.00/month, yet
> they REFUSE to link a mobile phone to it. Sheer brigandage.

Re: Right to Privacy gone ?

<i0npJ.37591$xe2.4968@fx16.iad>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=4699&group=aus.legal#4699

  copy link   Newsgroups: aus.legal
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!ecngs!feeder2.ecngs.de!178.20.174.213.MISMATCH!feeder1.feed.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!peer03.ams4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx16.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
Subject: Re: Right to Privacy gone ?
Newsgroups: aus.legal
References: <ef317fa7-5250-4a95-b8a0-2e9c22695659n@googlegroups.com>
<j0dikbFcp2bU1@mid.individual.net>
<9537282a-b090-4917-83b1-acad4bee90e0n@googlegroups.com>
<f5e3c49f-0ec2-49c8-bab7-6e139730bef6n@googlegroups.com>
<j0dl5lFd6l8U1@mid.individual.net>
<8f36ced2-10c1-444f-a88b-c6b2c007cec5n@googlegroups.com>
From: hagg...@hotmail.com (F Murtz)
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/78.13.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <8f36ced2-10c1-444f-a88b-c6b2c007cec5n@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 33
Message-ID: <i0npJ.37591$xe2.4968@fx16.iad>
X-Complaints-To: https://www.astraweb.com/aup
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 10:27:26 UTC
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 21:27:23 +1100
X-Received-Bytes: 2226
 by: F Murtz - Tue, 30 Nov 2021 10:27 UTC

On 27/11/21 2:10 pm, Phil Allison wrote:
> Sylvia Else wrote:
>>>
>>> https://www.nsw.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-09/COVID-19-record-of-visitors-at-premises-form.pdf
>>>
>>> Several differing forms are in use - the above seems to be the newest.
>>>
>>> IME almost nobody uses the email alternative.
>>
>>>
>>
>> Typically, writing down a phone number takes less effort.
>> I think the only time most people are concerned about privacy is after a
>> lack of it has come back to bite them. Which is to say, when it's too late.
>
> ** Too true.
>
> Scenario:
>
> Pretty young thing fills in form with her mobile number - while being watched by a male admirer/stalker.
> Same young thing uses her email - stalker tracks her down on the internet using it in a search engine.
>
> Swap young thing for someone in public life.
> Get the idea?
>
> The safer way to do this is with a tablet PC owned by the venue
> where a staffer keys in the info and then it disappears into a locked data base
>
>
> ...... Phil
>
Although you have to tell staffer both names and phone number or email
out loud where any one near can hear.

Re: Right to Privacy gone ?

<s3npJ.37592$xe2.6020@fx16.iad>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=4700&group=aus.legal#4700

  copy link   Newsgroups: aus.legal
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!paganini.bofh.team!news.dns-netz.com!news.freedyn.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed7.news.xs4all.nl!news-out.netnews.com!news.alt.net!fdc2.netnews.com!peer02.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx16.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
Subject: Re: Right to Privacy gone ?
Newsgroups: aus.legal
References: <ef317fa7-5250-4a95-b8a0-2e9c22695659n@googlegroups.com>
<j0dikbFcp2bU1@mid.individual.net>
<9537282a-b090-4917-83b1-acad4bee90e0n@googlegroups.com>
<f5e3c49f-0ec2-49c8-bab7-6e139730bef6n@googlegroups.com>
<j0dl5lFd6l8U1@mid.individual.net>
<8f36ced2-10c1-444f-a88b-c6b2c007cec5n@googlegroups.com>
<i0npJ.37591$xe2.4968@fx16.iad>
From: hagg...@hotmail.com (F Murtz)
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/78.13.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <i0npJ.37591$xe2.4968@fx16.iad>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 42
Message-ID: <s3npJ.37592$xe2.6020@fx16.iad>
X-Complaints-To: https://www.astraweb.com/aup
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 10:30:48 UTC
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 21:30:47 +1100
X-Received-Bytes: 2438
 by: F Murtz - Tue, 30 Nov 2021 10:30 UTC

On 30/11/21 9:27 pm, F Murtz wrote:
> On 27/11/21 2:10 pm, Phil Allison wrote:
>>   Sylvia Else wrote:
>>>>
>>>> https://www.nsw.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-09/COVID-19-record-of-visitors-at-premises-form.pdf
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Several differing forms are in use - the above seems to be the newest.
>>>>
>>>> IME almost nobody uses the email alternative.
>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Typically, writing down a phone number takes less effort.
>>>   I think the only time most people are concerned about privacy is
>>> after a
>>> lack of it has come back to bite them. Which is to say, when it's too
>>> late.
>>
>>   **  Too true.
>>
>>   Scenario:
>>
>>   Pretty young thing fills in form with her mobile number - while
>> being watched by a male admirer/stalker.
>>   Same young thing uses her email -  stalker tracks her down on the
>> internet using it in a search engine.
>>
>> Swap young thing for someone in public life.
>> Get the idea?
>>
>> The safer way to do this is with a tablet PC owned by the venue
>>   where a staffer keys in the info and then it disappears into a
>> locked data base
>>
>>
>> ......  Phil
>>
> Although you have to tell staffer both names and phone number or email
> out loud where any one near can hear.
afterthought, at least on paper you can use first name and a letter and
purpose made email.

Re: Right to Privacy gone ?

<j0ms1sF5t86U1@mid.individual.net>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=4702&group=aus.legal#4702

  copy link   Newsgroups: aus.legal
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: rod.spee...@gmail.com (Rod Speed)
Newsgroups: aus.legal
Subject: Re: Right to Privacy gone ?
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2021 01:50:34 +1100
Lines: 45
Message-ID: <j0ms1sF5t86U1@mid.individual.net>
References: <ef317fa7-5250-4a95-b8a0-2e9c22695659n@googlegroups.com> <j0dikbFcp2bU1@mid.individual.net> <9537282a-b090-4917-83b1-acad4bee90e0n@googlegroups.com> <f5e3c49f-0ec2-49c8-bab7-6e139730bef6n@googlegroups.com> <j0dl5lFd6l8U1@mid.individual.net> <8f36ced2-10c1-444f-a88b-c6b2c007cec5n@googlegroups.com> <i0npJ.37591$xe2.4968@fx16.iad>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
format=flowed;
charset="UTF-8";
reply-type=response
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net B32TgUSra3WxE4J0YbR70AlV4F9Y4lPG1+sEoJfKsqsCF97/4=
Cancel-Lock: sha1:NIWyIsnfa3v7pC+8bqMG2VP03hI=
In-Reply-To: <i0npJ.37591$xe2.4968@fx16.iad>
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Importance: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416
 by: Rod Speed - Tue, 30 Nov 2021 14:50 UTC

F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote
> Phil Allison wrote
>> Sylvia Else wrote

>>>> https://www.nsw.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-09/COVID-19-record-of-visitors-at-premises-form.pdf

>>>> Several differing forms are in use - the above seems to be the newest.

>>>> IME almost nobody uses the email alternative.

>>> Typically, writing down a phone number takes less effort.

>>> I think the only time most people are concerned about privacy is after a
>>> lack of it has come back to bite them. Which is to say, when it's too
>>> late.

>> Too true.

>> Scenario:

>> Pretty young thing fills in form with her mobile number - while being
>> watched by a male admirer/stalker. Same young thing uses her email -
>> stalker tracks her down on the internet using it in a search engine.

>> Swap young thing for someone in public life.
>> Get the idea?

>> The safer way to do this is with a tablet PC owned by the venue where a
>> staffer keys in the info and then it disappears into a locked data base

> Although you have to tell staffer both names

The law doesn’t say that, just contact details.

And the monkey has no way of knowing if the name
details are correct so you can use a fake name that
you know you used for that so you will know that it
is the fake name you used if they contact you to tell
you that you need to isolate.

> and phone number or email out loud where any one near can hear.

But you can write those down and show
that to the monkey doing the data entry.

Pages:12
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.8
clearnet tor