On Tue, 03 May 2022 04:10:13 +1000, Bazza <letshaveit@gmail.com> wrote:

> A lady friend made what I thought was a good suggestion.
>
> Her idea was to contact the local church and ask they they had a local
> member of the congregation who is mature, unemployed/retired, honest and
> reliable who could manage access to the garages on my behalf. for a fee.
> This would involve the person opening up the padlock on each garage when
> a new tenancy was agreed. When the tenancy terminated, he or she would
> inspect the garage and re-apply the padlock again. I reckon £50 -£80 for
> each for each in/out tenancy would be fair for what would be 10 minutes
> work.
> If there was a problem tenant who did not remove his own padlock, then I
> would provide a cordless angle grinder to remove the same.
>
> What do you reckon - given that my late mother left £10,000 to the local
> church 10 years ago in her will?

Your fundamental problem is that the income for the individual wouldn't
be very high because the turnover of clents wouldnt be high.

More likely to appeal to a handyman than anyone else imo.

On 02/05/2022 19:10, Bazza wrote:
> given that my late mother left £10,000 to the local church 10 years ago in her will?

I bet you could have killed her -- except that she was already dead.

Bill

On 02/05/2022 19:52, Jock wrote:
>> Her idea was to contact the local church and ask they they had a local
>> member of the congregation who is mature, unemployed/retired, honest
>> and reliable
>
> Dunno how likely it would be that an unemployed person would
> be honest and reliable

Oh really, you are the limit sometimes.

Bill

On 03/05/2022 03:05, williamwright wrote:
> On 02/05/2022 19:10, Bazza wrote:
>> given that my late mother left £10,000 to the local church  10 years
>> ago in her will?
>
> I bet you could have killed her --  except that she was already dead.
>
> Bill

I know of someone who left a large sum of money to a cat's charity by
way of a percentage of the estate which meant the solicitors from the
charity were in the loop attempting to get as much money as possible and
seriously hampering any attempts to sell property quickly (not at a
knockdown price). In the end all the delays just put more money in the
pockets of all the solicitors.

--
mailto : news {at} admac {dot} myzen {dot} co {dot} uk

On Tue, 03 May 2022 12:07:31 +1000, williamwright <wrightsaerials@f2s.com>
wrote:

> On 02/05/2022 19:52, Jock wrote:
>>> Her idea was to contact the local church and ask they they had a local
>>> member of the congregation who is mature, unemployed/retired, honest
>>> and reliable
>> Dunno how likely it would be that an unemployed person would
>> be honest and reliable
>
> Oh really, you are the limit sometimes.

Says the fuckwit carefully deleting the rest of that sentence.

You really are the limit all the time.

On 02/05/2022 10:21, Brian wrote:
> Jim Stewart ... <kinvig.netta@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>> On 01/05/2022 08:42, Richard wrote:
>>> On 01/05/2022 08:33, Jeff Gaines wrote:
>>>> On 01/05/2022 in message <t4lauv$822$1@dont-email.me> Jim Stewart ...
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 30/04/2022 18:45, Rod Speed wrote:
>>>>>> Jim Stewart ... <kinvig.netta@ntlworld.com> wrote
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-61280625
>>>>>>
>>>>>> He has now admitted that that was a lie and is resigning.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-61284686
>>>>> are all conservatives liars then ?
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps all politicians? Starmer and Rayner are up there at the top of
>>>> the tree.
>>>
>>> Everyone lies at some point.
>>>
>>
>> That's a lie ...
>>
>
> Beaten up.
>
> Claims re people having wigs.
>
>
>
>
>
indeed...tee hee

On 30/04/2022 11:42, Jim Stewart ... wrote:
> https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-61280625

What was he searching for? Reverse Dutch tractors?

On 03/05/2022 11:32, R D S wrote:
> On 30/04/2022 11:42, Jim Stewart ... wrote:
>> https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-61280625
>
> What was he searching for? Reverse Dutch tractors?

Apparently not tractors, but combine-harvesters, the Claas Dominator.