Why did World Touring Melbourne wait 2 years to do this? Did they really explect it to go on during a pandemic before vaccines? What a bunch of dickflutes. Hmmm one of the booked acts, Miley Cyrus was still at home too scared to travel anyway.

On 5/04/2022 7:53 am, Falscher Bruce wrote:
> Why did World Touring Melbourne wait 2 years to do this? Did they really explect it to go on during a pandemic before vaccines? What a bunch of dickflutes. Hmmm one of the booked acts, Miley Cyrus was still at home too scared to travel anyway.

Did Touring Melbourne invest money into the events expecting some
return, and then the events didn't happen?

Is that what they are suing about?

On 05-Apr-22 7:53 am, Falscher Bruce wrote:
> Why did World Touring Melbourne wait 2 years to do this? Did they really explect it to go on during a pandemic before vaccines? What a bunch of dickflutes. Hmmm one of the booked acts, Miley Cyrus was still at home too scared to travel anyway.

I'm sure Australian Grand Prix Corporation will argue that the contract
was frustrated by the pandemic. If the court accepts that, then World
Touring Australia will lose and have to pay costs.

This is, of course, unless the contract specifically addressed what
should happen in an epidemic or pandemic, or where the government
imposes restrictions.

Sylvia.

On 6/04/2022 7:54 pm, Sylvia Else wrote:
> On 05-Apr-22 7:53 am, Falscher Bruce wrote:
>> Why did World Touring Melbourne wait 2 years to do this? Did they
>> really explect it to go on during a pandemic before vaccines? What a
>> bunch of dickflutes. Hmmm one of the booked acts, Miley Cyrus was
>> still at home too scared to travel anyway.
>
> I'm sure Australian Grand Prix Corporation will argue that the contract
> was frustrated by the pandemic. If the court accepts that, then World
> Touring Australia will lose and have to pay costs.
>

Surely it will be settled out of court? Only cases that could go either
way make it to court.

> This is, of course, unless the contract specifically addressed what
> should happen in an epidemic or pandemic, or where the government
> imposes restrictions.
>
> Sylvia.

On 09-Apr-22 3:18 pm, Max wrote:
> On 6/04/2022 7:54 pm, Sylvia Else wrote:
>> On 05-Apr-22 7:53 am, Falscher Bruce wrote:
>>> Why did World Touring Melbourne wait 2 years to do this? Did they
>>> really explect it to go on during a pandemic before vaccines? What a
>>> bunch of dickflutes. Hmmm one of the booked acts, Miley Cyrus was
>>> still at home too scared to travel anyway.
>>
>> I'm sure Australian Grand Prix Corporation will argue that the
>> contract was frustrated by the pandemic. If the court accepts that,
>> then World Touring Australia will lose and have to pay costs.
>>
>
> Surely it will be settled out of court?  Only cases that could go either
> way make it to court.
>

You'd think so, but sometimes plaintiffs or defendants just won't be told.

Sylvia.

Sylvia Else wrote:
==============
>
> Falscher Bruce wrote:
>
> > Why did World Touring Melbourne wait 2 years to do this?
>> Did they really explect it to go on during a pandemic before vaccines?
>> What a bunch of dickflutes. Hmmm one of the booked acts,
>> Miley Cyrus was still at home too scared to travel anyway.
>
>
> I'm sure Australian Grand Prix Corporation will argue that the contract
> was frustrated by the pandemic. If the court accepts that, then World
> Touring Australia will lose and have to pay costs.
>
> This is, of course, unless the contract specifically addressed what
> should happen in an epidemic or pandemic, or where the government
> imposes restrictions.
>

** As usual, one cannot sensibly discuss a contract dispute WITHOUT seeing the damn contract.
Lawyers all know this and would insist on seeing the doc before saying a word.

OTOH journalists and the public have no such inhibition.

...... Phil