novaBBS - aus.legal - Re: why is ID mandatory for historical title search?????

why is ID mandatory for historical title search?????

<626fa16f$1@news.ausics.net>

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=5968&group=aus.legal#5968

Newsgroups: aus.legal
X-Mozilla-News-Host: news://news.ausics.net:119
From: ozix12...@yahoo.com (Ozix)
Subject: why is ID mandatory for historical title search?????
Date: Mon, 2 May 2022 17:16:31 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
Firefox/68.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.11.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
NNTP-Posting-Host: news.ausics.net
Message-ID: <626fa16f$1@news.ausics.net>
Organization: Ausics - https://www.ausics.net
Lines: 5
X-Complaints: abuse@ausics.net
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!news.bbs.nz!news.ausics.net!not-for-mail

by: Ozix - Mon, 2 May 2022 09:16 UTC

I went to the land titles office to do some research, to find out who
owned a house in the 1930s. But they told me I need 100 points of ID
before handing over the application form! I can understand if one wanted
the current owner, maybe baby. I could be stalking my ex or fishing for
a protected witness. Why do I need such waffle when that owner is dead?

Re: why is ID mandatory for historical title search?????

<42gv6hpcvtguu93cv1ujj59t82mnr1e4c7@4ax.com>

copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=5969&group=aus.legal#5969

copy link Newsgroups: aus.legal

Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!news.uzoreto.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: pet...@gmail.com (Petzl)
Newsgroups: aus.legal
Subject: Re: why is ID mandatory for historical title search?????
Date: Mon, 02 May 2022 21:33:15 +1000
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <42gv6hpcvtguu93cv1ujj59t82mnr1e4c7@4ax.com>
References: <626fa16f$1@news.ausics.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net RoxRR6Q7o842gEkBrTO+8wjRzeX+V86OoHEXd7mtDLhOjPJFWr
Cancel-Lock: sha1:akv6Qkzm4ZkicbSCqQ22zGPH9Mo=
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272

by: Petzl - Mon, 2 May 2022 11:33 UTC

On Mon, 2 May 2022 17:16:31 +0800, Ozix <ozix12345@yahoo.com> wrote:

>I went to the land titles office to do some research, to find out who
>owned a house in the 1930s. But they told me I need 100 points of ID
>before handing over the application form! I can understand if one wanted
>the current owner, maybe baby. I could be stalking my ex or fishing for
>a protected witness. Why do I need such waffle when that owner is dead?
>
Current owner and status is given and if or not under bank loan given
for $30, used to cost $10.
<https://www.nswlrs.com.au/Titles-Dealings/Title-Information-(1)/Access-Titling-Information>
https://tinyurl.com/y3bdv3hg
--
Petzl
Good lawyers know the law
Great lawyers know the judge

Re: why is ID mandatory for historical title search?????

<t4qds5$1av$1@gioia.aioe.org>

copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=5970&group=aus.legal#5970

copy link Newsgroups: aus.legal

Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!y5+HOOoKIMtxjCZfPYnWgA.user.46.165.242.91.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: max...@val.morgan (Max)
Newsgroups: aus.legal
Subject: Re: why is ID mandatory for historical title search?????
Date: Tue, 3 May 2022 15:16:53 +1000
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <t4qds5$1av$1@gioia.aioe.org>
References: <626fa16f$1@news.ausics.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="1375"; posting-host="y5+HOOoKIMtxjCZfPYnWgA.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/91.8.1
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2

by: Max - Tue, 3 May 2022 05:16 UTC

On 2/05/2022 7:16 pm, Ozix wrote:
> I went to the land titles office to do some research, to find out who
> owned a house in the 1930s. But they told me I need 100 points of ID
> before handing over the application form! I can understand if one wanted
> the current owner, maybe baby. I could be stalking my ex or fishing for
> a protected witness. Why do I need such waffle when that owner is dead?

Why not just hand over the ID? What are you worried about?

May the bluebird of happiness twiddle your bits.

aus+uk / aus.legal / Re: why is ID mandatory for historical title search?????

Subject	Author
why is ID mandatory for historical title search?????	Ozix
Re: why is ID mandatory for historical title search?????	Petzl
Re: why is ID mandatory for historical title search?????	Max