Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

Weiler's Law: Nothing is impossible for the man who doesn't have to do it himself.


aus+uk / uk.railway / Re: How valuable is the Virgin Trains brand?

SubjectAuthor
o How valuable is the Virgin Trains brand?Recliner

1
Re: How valuable is the Virgin Trains brand?

<4ajg8i5n4nknqqald1jth6fnc33q5bkobd@4ax.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=61340&group=uk.railway#61340

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.railway
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!feeder1.feed.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!peer02.ams4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!peer02.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!fx15.ams1.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: recliner...@gmail.com (Recliner)
Newsgroups: uk.railway
Subject: Re: How valuable is the Virgin Trains brand?
Message-ID: <4ajg8i5n4nknqqald1jth6fnc33q5bkobd@4ax.com>
References: <u5k8af$a64k$5@dont-email.me> <u61uhc$2ahbp$1@dont-email.me> <u62a5r$2c1vg$1@dont-email.me> <N8MFUgk14thkFAAc@perry.uk> <u66nik$325d4$1@dont-email.me> <u67gir$35kl3$1@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: ForteAgent/7.20.32.1218
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 41
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte - www.forteinc.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2023 12:09:35 +0100
X-Received-Bytes: 2622
 by: Recliner - Tue, 13 Jun 2023 11:09 UTC

On Mon, 12 Jun 2023 17:19:38 +0100, Coffee <martin.coffee@round-midnight.org.uk> wrote:

>On 12/06/2023 10:12, Graeme Wall wrote:
>> On 12/06/2023 09:58, Roland Perry wrote:
>>> In message <u62a5r$2c1vg$1@dont-email.me>, at 17:59:38 on Sat, 10 Jun
>>> 2023, Graeme Wall <rail@greywall.demon.co.uk> remarked:
>>>> On 10/06/2023 14:41, Coffee wrote:
>>>>> On 05/06/2023 10:02, Recliner wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> Virgin puts power of its brand to the test in High Court dispute
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/1cb4ae6e-02d4-11ee-9bf2-8ca4db35d92
>>>>>> 8?shareToken=50481fe4f4b965f8bc7b44a6657600b6
>>>
>>>>>  In my view the Virgin brand has a negative value.
>>>>
>>>> You are in a minority
>>>
>>> Just so you know [tm] I'm not so sure. NTL was always a pretty
>>> terrible telco, and being rebranded Virgin didn't help much. They
>>> still keep mailing me saying if I swap to them I'll save about twice
>>> as much as I'm currently paying (how does that work?)
>>>
>>> Most of the former advantages of Virgin Mobile have now rotted away.
>>>
>>> Virgin Express was one of the worst airlines I've ever flown on, even
>>> managing to trump 'Such A Bad Experience, Never Again'.
>>>
>>
>> Rather than rely on biased and out-of-date anecdata, try looking at the
>> company's actual trading results.
>
>The trading results don't represent value for money, the passenger
>experience, or their service to their customers.

Most Virgin brands don't have passengers:
https://www.virgin.com/virgin-companies

Note that these companies are all choosing to pay significant sums for the right to use the Virgin brand (most have
little or no shareholding from the Virgin Group).

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.8
clearnet tor