Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

The biggest mistake you can make is to believe that you are working for someone else.


aus+uk / aus.legal / unfair dismissal

SubjectAuthor
* unfair dismissalMax
+* Re: unfair dismissalSylvia Else
|`* Re: unfair dismissalMax
| `* Re: unfair dismissalRod Speed
|  `* Re: unfair dismissalMax
|   +* Re: unfair dismissalSylvia Else
|   |+* Re: unfair dismissalPhil Allison
|   ||+* Re: unfair dismissalMax
|   |||`* Re: unfair dismissalPhil Allison
|   ||| `* Re: unfair dismissalMax
|   |||  `- Re: unfair dismissalPhil Allison
|   ||+- Re: unfair dismissalSylvia Else
|   ||`* Re: unfair dismissalRod Speed
|   || `* Re: unfair dismissalPhil Allison
|   ||  `- Re: unfair dismissalRod Speed
|   |`* Re: unfair dismissalMax
|   | +* Re: unfair dismissalSylvia Else
|   | |`* Re: unfair dismissalMax
|   | | `* Re: unfair dismissalRod Speed
|   | |  `* Re: unfair dismissalMax
|   | |   `* Re: unfair dismissalRod Speed
|   | |    `* Re: unfair dismissalMax
|   | |     `* Re: unfair dismissalRod Speed
|   | |      +* Re: unfair dismissalMax
|   | |      |+* Re: unfair dismissalRod Speed
|   | |      ||`* Re: unfair dismissalMax
|   | |      || `- Re: unfair dismissalRod Speed
|   | |      |+- Re: unfair dismissalRod Speed
|   | |      |`* Re: unfair dismissalPetzl
|   | |      | `- Re: unfair dismissalRod Speed
|   | |      `* Re: unfair dismissalMax
|   | |       `* Re: unfair dismissalRod Speed
|   | |        `* Re: unfair dismissalMax
|   | |         `- Re: unfair dismissalRod Speed
|   | `* Re: unfair dismissalRod Speed
|   |  `* Re: unfair dismissalMax
|   |   `* Re: unfair dismissalRod Speed
|   |    `* Re: unfair dismissalMax
|   |     `- Re: unfair dismissalRod Speed
|   `* Re: unfair dismissalRod Speed
|    `* Re: unfair dismissalMax
|     `* Re: unfair dismissalRod Speed
|      `* Re: unfair dismissalMax
|       `* Re: unfair dismissalRod Speed
|        `* Re: unfair dismissalMax
|         `* Re: unfair dismissalRod Speed
|          `* Re: unfair dismissalPetzl
|           `* Re: unfair dismissalRod Speed
|            `* Re: unfair dismissalPetzl
|             `* Re: unfair dismissalRod Speed
|              `* Re: unfair dismissalMax
|               `* Re: unfair dismissalRod Speed
|                `* Re: unfair dismissalMax
|                 `* Re: unfair dismissalRod Speed
|                  `* Re: unfair dismissalMax
|                   `* Re: unfair dismissalRod Speed
|                    `* Re: unfair dismissalMax
|                     `* Re: unfair dismissalRod Speed
|                      `* Re: unfair dismissalMax
|                       `* Re: unfair dismissalRod Speed
|                        `* Re: unfair dismissalMax
|                         `* Re: unfair dismissalRod Speed
|                          +* Re: unfair dismissalMax
|                          |`* Re: unfair dismissalRod Speed
|                          | `* Re: unfair dismissalMax
|                          |  `* Re: unfair dismissalRod Speed
|                          |   `* Re: unfair dismissalMax
|                          |    +* Re: unfair dismissalRod Speed
|                          |    |`* Re: unfair dismissalMax
|                          |    | `* Re: unfair dismissalRod Speed
|                          |    |  `* Re: unfair dismissalMax
|                          |    |   `- Re: unfair dismissalRod Speed
|                          |    `* Re: unfair dismissalPetzl
|                          |     +* Re: unfair dismissalRod Speed
|                          |     |+* Re: unfair dismissalPetzl
|                          |     ||`- Re: unfair dismissalRod Speed
|                          |     |`* Re: unfair dismissalMax
|                          |     | +* Re: unfair dismissalPetzl
|                          |     | |`* Re: unfair dismissalRod Speed
|                          |     | | +* Re: unfair dismissalPetzl
|                          |     | | |`* Re: unfair dismissalRod Speed
|                          |     | | | `- Re: unfair dismissalRod Speed
|                          |     | | `* Re: unfair dismissalMax
|                          |     | |  `- Re: unfair dismissalRod Speed
|                          |     | `* Re: unfair dismissalRod Speed
|                          |     |  `* Re: unfair dismissalMax
|                          |     |   `* Re: unfair dismissalRod Speed
|                          |     |    `* Re: unfair dismissalMax
|                          |     |     `* Re: unfair dismissalRod Speed
|                          |     |      `* Re: unfair dismissalMax
|                          |     |       `* Re: unfair dismissalRod Speed
|                          |     |        `* Re: unfair dismissalMax
|                          |     |         `* Re: unfair dismissalRod Speed
|                          |     |          +* Re: unfair dismissalMax
|                          |     |          |`- Re: unfair dismissalRod Speed
|                          |     |          `* Re: unfair dismissalMax
|                          |     |           `* Re: unfair dismissalRod Speed
|                          |     |            `* Re: unfair dismissalMax
|                          |     |             `* Re: unfair dismissalRod Speed
|                          |     |              `* Re: unfair dismissalMax
|                          |     |               `* Re: unfair dismissalRod Speed
|                          |     `* Re: unfair dismissalMax
|                          `* Re: unfair dismissalMax
`* Re: unfair dismissalRod Speed

Pages:12345
unfair dismissal

<tato7j$16h6$1@gioia.aioe.org>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=6738&group=aus.legal#6738

  copy link   Newsgroups: aus.legal
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!y5+HOOoKIMtxjCZfPYnWgA.user.46.165.242.91.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: max...@val.morgan (Max)
Newsgroups: aus.legal
Subject: unfair dismissal
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2022 17:09:36 +1000
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <tato7j$16h6$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="39462"; posting-host="y5+HOOoKIMtxjCZfPYnWgA.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/91.11.0
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
 by: Max - Sat, 16 Jul 2022 07:09 UTC

If an organisation is cutting back employees, and Person A is sacked,
could Person A claim that Person B should have been sacked instead
because Person A has been at the organisation longer?

Would there be a basis for this sort of claim in law?

Re: unfair dismissal

<jjfcvaF5go9U1@mid.individual.net>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=6739&group=aus.legal#6739

  copy link   Newsgroups: aus.legal
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.goja.nl.eu.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!lilly.ping.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: syl...@email.invalid (Sylvia Else)
Newsgroups: aus.legal
Subject: Re: unfair dismissal
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2022 18:59:21 +1000
Lines: 8
Message-ID: <jjfcvaF5go9U1@mid.individual.net>
References: <tato7j$16h6$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net xCYPPiUDZY8J6iseB9ZhbgBfkiB9Ujgn3LTskpYWpnVpqyilii
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Bg2VIbD4jse7K4TZlUSIWHUhXdU=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/91.11.0
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <tato7j$16h6$1@gioia.aioe.org>
 by: Sylvia Else - Sat, 16 Jul 2022 08:59 UTC

On 16-July-22 5:09 pm, Max wrote:
> If an organisation is cutting back employees, and Person A is sacked,
> could Person A claim that Person B should have been sacked instead
> because Person A has been at the organisation longer?
>
> Would there be a basis for this sort of claim in law?

No.

Re: unfair dismissal

<op.1pd66nk9byq249@pvr2.lan>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=6740&group=aus.legal#6740

  copy link   Newsgroups: aus.legal
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.goja.nl.eu.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!lilly.ping.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: rod.spee...@gmail.com (Rod Speed)
Newsgroups: aus.legal
Subject: Re: unfair dismissal
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2022 19:26:37 +1000
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <op.1pd66nk9byq249@pvr2.lan>
References: <tato7j$16h6$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net ei42FDXyjxyJI9pmmbmjEgo+DYQurxsa2J7m05eyUTlIWNVjg=
Cancel-Lock: sha1:f7JcoHGKZv7YfA35RLhaAJc9z00=
User-Agent: Opera Mail/1.0 (Win32)
 by: Rod Speed - Sat, 16 Jul 2022 09:26 UTC

Max <max@val.morgan> wrote

> If an organisation is cutting back employees, and Person A is sacked,
> could Person A claim that Person B should have been sacked instead
> because Person A has been at the organisation longer?

Nope, because there is no legal requirement that the more
recently employed individual should be sacked first.

The employer is free to sack the least useful individual first.

> Would there be a basis for this sort of claim in law?

Nope.

Re: unfair dismissal

<tau1is$ta8$1@gioia.aioe.org>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=6741&group=aus.legal#6741

  copy link   Newsgroups: aus.legal
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!y5+HOOoKIMtxjCZfPYnWgA.user.46.165.242.91.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: max...@val.morgan (Max)
Newsgroups: aus.legal
Subject: Re: unfair dismissal
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2022 19:49:13 +1000
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <tau1is$ta8$1@gioia.aioe.org>
References: <tato7j$16h6$1@gioia.aioe.org> <jjfcvaF5go9U1@mid.individual.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="30024"; posting-host="y5+HOOoKIMtxjCZfPYnWgA.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/91.11.0
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
 by: Max - Sat, 16 Jul 2022 09:49 UTC

On 16/07/2022 6:59 pm, Sylvia Else wrote:
> On 16-July-22 5:09 pm, Max wrote:
>> If an organisation is cutting back employees, and Person A is sacked,
>> could Person A claim that Person B should have been sacked instead
>> because Person A has been at the organisation longer?
>>
>> Would there be a basis for this sort of claim in law?
>
> No.

If an organisation has to sack someone and they choose to sack the more
experienced employee, how could that be fair?

Re: unfair dismissal

<tau1jl$ta8$2@gioia.aioe.org>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=6742&group=aus.legal#6742

  copy link   Newsgroups: aus.legal
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!y5+HOOoKIMtxjCZfPYnWgA.user.46.165.242.91.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: max...@val.morgan (Max)
Newsgroups: aus.legal
Subject: Re: unfair dismissal
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2022 19:49:39 +1000
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <tau1jl$ta8$2@gioia.aioe.org>
References: <tato7j$16h6$1@gioia.aioe.org> <op.1pd66nk9byq249@pvr2.lan>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="30024"; posting-host="y5+HOOoKIMtxjCZfPYnWgA.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/91.11.0
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
 by: Max - Sat, 16 Jul 2022 09:49 UTC

On 16/07/2022 7:26 pm, Rod Speed wrote:
> Max <max@val.morgan> wrote
>
>> If an organisation is cutting back employees, and Person A is sacked,
>> could Person A claim that Person B should have been sacked instead
>> because Person A has been at the organisation longer?
>
> Nope, because there is no legal requirement that the more
> recently employed individual should be sacked first.
>
> The employer is free to sack the least useful individual first.
>
>> Would there be a basis for this sort of claim in law?
>
> Nope.

If an organisation has to sack someone and they choose to sack the more
experienced employee, how could that be fair?

Re: unfair dismissal

<op.1pd8g7f7byq249@pvr2.lan>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=6743&group=aus.legal#6743

  copy link   Newsgroups: aus.legal
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.goja.nl.eu.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!news-peer.in.tum.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: rod.spee...@gmail.com (Rod Speed)
Newsgroups: aus.legal
Subject: Re: unfair dismissal
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2022 19:54:33 +1000
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <op.1pd8g7f7byq249@pvr2.lan>
References: <tato7j$16h6$1@gioia.aioe.org> <jjfcvaF5go9U1@mid.individual.net>
<tau1is$ta8$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net HAh1ob1gmIL3RGLKabO08Ajt2e69klihJ+If5czonCg+lLZ/s=
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Rz3FUYbj17BmRgv3RSLJfxSf5uc=
User-Agent: Opera Mail/1.0 (Win32)
 by: Rod Speed - Sat, 16 Jul 2022 09:54 UTC

Max <max@val.morgan> wrote
> Sylvia Else wrote
>> Max wrote

>>> If an organisation is cutting back employees, and Person A is sacked,
>>> could Person A claim that Person B should have been sacked instead
>>> because Person A has been at the organisation longer?
>>>
>>> Would there be a basis for this sort of claim in law?
>> No.
>
> If an organisation has to sack someone and they choose to sack the more
> experienced employee, how could that be fair?

It isn't about fair. It can make sense to do that if they are paid more.

Happens all the time in the fast food industry because new kids are
cheaper.

Re: unfair dismissal

<op.1pd8h7ahbyq249@pvr2.lan>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=6744&group=aus.legal#6744

  copy link   Newsgroups: aus.legal
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.goja.nl.eu.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!lilly.ping.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: rod.spee...@gmail.com (Rod Speed)
Newsgroups: aus.legal
Subject: Re: unfair dismissal
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2022 19:55:09 +1000
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <op.1pd8h7ahbyq249@pvr2.lan>
References: <tato7j$16h6$1@gioia.aioe.org> <op.1pd66nk9byq249@pvr2.lan>
<tau1jl$ta8$2@gioia.aioe.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net z5SgVDKuMzfLGNslPPsSZwm7AznxCHdRIsrQ3Yj+owebIxoNE=
Cancel-Lock: sha1:IXpfcerbtdF5kN2phwi5dwQCqYc=
User-Agent: Opera Mail/1.0 (Win32)
 by: Rod Speed - Sat, 16 Jul 2022 09:55 UTC

On Sat, 16 Jul 2022 19:49:39 +1000, Max <max@val.morgan> wrote:

> On 16/07/2022 7:26 pm, Rod Speed wrote:
>> Max <max@val.morgan> wrote
>>
>>> If an organisation is cutting back employees, and Person A is sacked,
>>> could Person A claim that Person B should have been sacked instead
>>> because Person A has been at the organisation longer?
>> Nope, because there is no legal requirement that the more
>> recently employed individual should be sacked first.
>> The employer is free to sack the least useful individual first.
>>
>>> Would there be a basis for this sort of claim in law?
>> Nope.
>
> If an organisation has to sack someone and they choose to sack the more
> experienced employee, how could that be fair?

See my other post.

Re: unfair dismissal

<tau4cc$ka$1@gioia.aioe.org>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=6745&group=aus.legal#6745

  copy link   Newsgroups: aus.legal
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!y5+HOOoKIMtxjCZfPYnWgA.user.46.165.242.91.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: max...@val.morgan (Max)
Newsgroups: aus.legal
Subject: Re: unfair dismissal
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2022 20:36:58 +1000
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <tau4cc$ka$1@gioia.aioe.org>
References: <tato7j$16h6$1@gioia.aioe.org> <jjfcvaF5go9U1@mid.individual.net>
<tau1is$ta8$1@gioia.aioe.org> <op.1pd8g7f7byq249@pvr2.lan>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="650"; posting-host="y5+HOOoKIMtxjCZfPYnWgA.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/91.11.0
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
 by: Max - Sat, 16 Jul 2022 10:36 UTC

On 16/07/2022 7:54 pm, Rod Speed wrote:
> Max <max@val.morgan> wrote
>> Sylvia Else wrote
>>> Max wrote
>
>>>> If an organisation is cutting back employees, and Person A is
>>>> sacked, could Person A claim that Person B should have been sacked
>>>> instead because Person A has been at the organisation longer?
>>>>
>>>> Would there be a basis for this sort of claim in law?
>>>  No.
>>
>> If an organisation has to sack someone and they choose to sack the
>> more experienced employee, how could that be fair?
>
> It isn't about fair. It can make sense to do that if they are paid more.
>
> Happens all the time in the fast food industry because new kids are
> cheaper.

I mean if all other things are equal.

If both employees are paid equal and there are no promotions forthcoming
to either employee, then if the more experienced employee is dismissed,
that would be unfair.

Re: unfair dismissal

<jjftssF858aU1@mid.individual.net>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=6746&group=aus.legal#6746

  copy link   Newsgroups: aus.legal
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!news.uzoreto.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: syl...@email.invalid (Sylvia Else)
Newsgroups: aus.legal
Subject: Re: unfair dismissal
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2022 23:48:10 +1000
Lines: 33
Message-ID: <jjftssF858aU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <tato7j$16h6$1@gioia.aioe.org> <jjfcvaF5go9U1@mid.individual.net>
<tau1is$ta8$1@gioia.aioe.org> <op.1pd8g7f7byq249@pvr2.lan>
<tau4cc$ka$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net dULmzvlI3S5kuaAXxS/eoQzuwE+cC4yeeDttw249RY0ec5u8Le
Cancel-Lock: sha1:RE3h8c+wwy3EXeHKRuiXaTMklcQ=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/91.11.0
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <tau4cc$ka$1@gioia.aioe.org>
 by: Sylvia Else - Sat, 16 Jul 2022 13:48 UTC

On 16-July-22 8:36 pm, Max wrote:
> On 16/07/2022 7:54 pm, Rod Speed wrote:
>> Max <max@val.morgan> wrote
>>> Sylvia Else wrote
>>>> Max wrote
>>
>>>>> If an organisation is cutting back employees, and Person A is
>>>>> sacked, could Person A claim that Person B should have been sacked
>>>>> instead because Person A has been at the organisation longer?
>>>>>
>>>>> Would there be a basis for this sort of claim in law?
>>>>  No.
>>>
>>> If an organisation has to sack someone and they choose to sack the
>>> more experienced employee, how could that be fair?
>>
>> It isn't about fair. It can make sense to do that if they are paid more.
>>
>> Happens all the time in the fast food industry because new kids are
>> cheaper.
>
> I mean if all other things are equal.
>
> If both employees are paid equal and there are no promotions forthcoming
> to either employee, then if the more experienced employee is dismissed,
> that would be unfair.

The meaning of "unfair" in this context is defined by the applicable
legislation.

<www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/legis/cth/consol_act/fwa2009114/s385.html>

Sylvia.

Re: unfair dismissal

<op.1peu8610byq249@pvr2.lan>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=6747&group=aus.legal#6747

  copy link   Newsgroups: aus.legal
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!news.uzoreto.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: rod.spee...@gmail.com (Rod Speed)
Newsgroups: aus.legal
Subject: Re: unfair dismissal
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2022 04:06:32 +1000
Lines: 36
Message-ID: <op.1peu8610byq249@pvr2.lan>
References: <tato7j$16h6$1@gioia.aioe.org> <jjfcvaF5go9U1@mid.individual.net>
<tau1is$ta8$1@gioia.aioe.org> <op.1pd8g7f7byq249@pvr2.lan>
<tau4cc$ka$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net d+vPXJai0jakgDgon14lYgfV6Sdj1tUK7kx2G9wPVglCHt0y4=
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Kh8Ei1+mUTPBFcUKRtP3YyGcZZ4=
User-Agent: Opera Mail/1.0 (Win32)
 by: Rod Speed - Sat, 16 Jul 2022 18:06 UTC

Max <max@val.morgan> wrote
> Rod Speed wrote
>> Max <max@val.morgan> wrote
>>> Sylvia Else wrote
>>>> Max wrote

>>>>> If an organisation is cutting back employees, and Person A is
>>>>> sacked, could Person A claim that Person B should have been sacked
>>>>> instead because Person A has been at the organisation longer?

>>>>> Would there be a basis for this sort of claim in law?

>>>> No.

>>> If an organisation has to sack someone and they choose to sack the
>>> more experienced employee, how could that be fair?

>> It isn't about fair. It can make sense to do that if they are paid
>> more.

>> Happens all the time in the fast food industry because new kids are
>> cheaper.

> I mean if all other things are equal.

They never are. There are far too many variables for that.

The other obvious variables are how pleasant their personality is,
how reliable they are, whether they are a union nit picker etc etc etc.

> If both employees are paid equal and there are no promotions forthcoming
> to either employee, then if the more experienced employee is dismissed,
> that would be unfair.

Wrong if they are more useful to the employer or just more pleasant to be
around etc.

Re: unfair dismissal

<06d61e49-429e-422d-8fa3-7feb471abbban@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=6748&group=aus.legal#6748

  copy link   Newsgroups: aus.legal
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5d49:0:b0:31e:c249:1529 with SMTP id g9-20020ac85d49000000b0031ec2491529mr17196926qtx.651.1658011975359;
Sat, 16 Jul 2022 15:52:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a37:b346:0:b0:6b2:8e4c:690c with SMTP id
c67-20020a37b346000000b006b28e4c690cmr13654542qkf.654.1658011975123; Sat, 16
Jul 2022 15:52:55 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: aus.legal
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2022 15:52:54 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <jjftssF858aU1@mid.individual.net>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=27.33.15.70; posting-account=B_tJMAoAAAAmar-1r2H3x4CMhbFEou3n
NNTP-Posting-Host: 27.33.15.70
References: <tato7j$16h6$1@gioia.aioe.org> <jjfcvaF5go9U1@mid.individual.net>
<tau1is$ta8$1@gioia.aioe.org> <op.1pd8g7f7byq249@pvr2.lan>
<tau4cc$ka$1@gioia.aioe.org> <jjftssF858aU1@mid.individual.net>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <06d61e49-429e-422d-8fa3-7feb471abbban@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: unfair dismissal
From: palliso...@gmail.com (Phil Allison)
Injection-Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2022 22:52:55 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 16
 by: Phil Allison - Sat, 16 Jul 2022 22:52 UTC

Sylvia Else wrote:
==============
>
> The meaning of "unfair" in this context is defined by the applicable
> legislation.
>
> <www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/legis/cth/consol_act/fwa2009114/s385.html>
>

** What if any is the mechanism for redress if you are unfairly dismissed ?
Can you get your job back or maybe compensation ?
Once was easy enough to do, but IIRC John Howard stymied it.
Googling the topic was unfruitful.

....... Phil

Re: unfair dismissal

<tavo9k$q9s$1@gioia.aioe.org>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=6750&group=aus.legal#6750

  copy link   Newsgroups: aus.legal
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!y5+HOOoKIMtxjCZfPYnWgA.user.46.165.242.91.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: max...@val.morgan (Max)
Newsgroups: aus.legal
Subject: Re: unfair dismissal
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2022 11:22:57 +1000
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <tavo9k$q9s$1@gioia.aioe.org>
References: <tato7j$16h6$1@gioia.aioe.org> <jjfcvaF5go9U1@mid.individual.net>
<tau1is$ta8$1@gioia.aioe.org> <op.1pd8g7f7byq249@pvr2.lan>
<tau4cc$ka$1@gioia.aioe.org> <jjftssF858aU1@mid.individual.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="26940"; posting-host="y5+HOOoKIMtxjCZfPYnWgA.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/91.11.0
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
 by: Max - Sun, 17 Jul 2022 01:22 UTC

On 16/07/2022 11:48 pm, Sylvia Else wrote:
> On 16-July-22 8:36 pm, Max wrote:
>> On 16/07/2022 7:54 pm, Rod Speed wrote:
>>> Max <max@val.morgan> wrote
>>>> Sylvia Else wrote
>>>>> Max wrote
>>>
>>>>>> If an organisation is cutting back employees, and Person A is
>>>>>> sacked, could Person A claim that Person B should have been sacked
>>>>>> instead because Person A has been at the organisation longer?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Would there be a basis for this sort of claim in law?
>>>>>  No.
>>>>
>>>> If an organisation has to sack someone and they choose to sack the
>>>> more experienced employee, how could that be fair?
>>>
>>> It isn't about fair. It can make sense to do that if they are paid more.
>>>
>>> Happens all the time in the fast food industry because new kids are
>>> cheaper.
>>
>> I mean if all other things are equal.
>>
>> If both employees are paid equal and there are no promotions
>> forthcoming to either employee, then if the more experienced employee
>> is dismissed, that would be unfair.
>
> The meaning of "unfair" in this context is defined by the applicable
> legislation.
>
> <www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/legis/cth/consol_act/fwa2009114/s385.html>
>

The words in that section are "harsh, unjust or unreasonable".

If a person is sacked instead of someone with less experience, then I
would say that it equates to the words above.

Re: unfair dismissal

<tavoap$q9s$2@gioia.aioe.org>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=6751&group=aus.legal#6751

  copy link   Newsgroups: aus.legal
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!y5+HOOoKIMtxjCZfPYnWgA.user.46.165.242.91.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: max...@val.morgan (Max)
Newsgroups: aus.legal
Subject: Re: unfair dismissal
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2022 11:23:36 +1000
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <tavoap$q9s$2@gioia.aioe.org>
References: <tato7j$16h6$1@gioia.aioe.org> <jjfcvaF5go9U1@mid.individual.net>
<tau1is$ta8$1@gioia.aioe.org> <op.1pd8g7f7byq249@pvr2.lan>
<tau4cc$ka$1@gioia.aioe.org> <jjftssF858aU1@mid.individual.net>
<06d61e49-429e-422d-8fa3-7feb471abbban@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="26940"; posting-host="y5+HOOoKIMtxjCZfPYnWgA.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/91.11.0
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
 by: Max - Sun, 17 Jul 2022 01:23 UTC

On 17/07/2022 8:52 am, Phil Allison wrote:
> Sylvia Else wrote:
> ==============
>>
>> The meaning of "unfair" in this context is defined by the applicable
>> legislation.
>>
>> <www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/legis/cth/consol_act/fwa2009114/s385.html>
>>
>
> ** What if any is the mechanism for redress if you are unfairly dismissed ?
> Can you get your job back or maybe compensation ?

Often it would be compensation. Maybe 6-12 months of salary.

> Once was easy enough to do, but IIRC John Howard stymied it.
> Googling the topic was unfruitful.
>
>
>
> ...... Phil

Re: unfair dismissal

<tavokn$tdd$1@gioia.aioe.org>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=6752&group=aus.legal#6752

  copy link   Newsgroups: aus.legal
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!y5+HOOoKIMtxjCZfPYnWgA.user.46.165.242.91.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: max...@val.morgan (Max)
Newsgroups: aus.legal
Subject: Re: unfair dismissal
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2022 11:28:52 +1000
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <tavokn$tdd$1@gioia.aioe.org>
References: <tato7j$16h6$1@gioia.aioe.org> <jjfcvaF5go9U1@mid.individual.net>
<tau1is$ta8$1@gioia.aioe.org> <op.1pd8g7f7byq249@pvr2.lan>
<tau4cc$ka$1@gioia.aioe.org> <op.1peu8610byq249@pvr2.lan>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="30125"; posting-host="y5+HOOoKIMtxjCZfPYnWgA.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/91.11.0
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
 by: Max - Sun, 17 Jul 2022 01:28 UTC

On 17/07/2022 4:06 am, Rod Speed wrote:
> Max <max@val.morgan> wrote
>> Rod Speed wrote
>>> Max <max@val.morgan> wrote
>>>> Sylvia Else wrote
>>>>> Max wrote
>
>>>>>> If an organisation is cutting back employees, and Person A is
>>>>>> sacked, could Person A claim that Person B should have been sacked
>>>>>> instead because Person A has been at the organisation longer?
>
>>>>>> Would there be a basis for this sort of claim in law?
>
>>>>>  No.
>
>>>> If an organisation has to sack someone and they choose to sack the
>>>> more experienced employee, how could that be fair?
>
>>>  It isn't about fair. It can make sense to do that if they are paid
>>> more.
>
>>>  Happens all the time in the fast food industry because new kids are
>>> cheaper.
>
>> I mean if all other things are equal.
>
> They never are. There are far too many variables for that.
>
> The other obvious variables are how pleasant their personality is,
> how reliable they are, whether they are a union nit picker etc etc etc.
>
>> If both employees are paid equal and there are no promotions
>> forthcoming to either employee, then if the more experienced employee
>> is dismissed, that would be unfair.
>
> Wrong if they are more useful to the employer or just more pleasant to
> be around etc.

If they were not pleasant to be around, why weren't they sacked before then?

It is not just or reasonable for an employer to sack a more experienced
person, just because they might like the other person a bit more, when
this does not affect the person's effectiveness in the job.

Clearly they must be effective otherwise they would have been sacked and
wouldn't have kept the job for so long.

Re: unfair dismissal

<jjh72vFee1pU1@mid.individual.net>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=6753&group=aus.legal#6753

  copy link   Newsgroups: aus.legal
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!news.uzoreto.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: syl...@email.invalid (Sylvia Else)
Newsgroups: aus.legal
Subject: Re: unfair dismissal
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2022 11:31:10 +1000
Lines: 44
Message-ID: <jjh72vFee1pU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <tato7j$16h6$1@gioia.aioe.org> <jjfcvaF5go9U1@mid.individual.net>
<tau1is$ta8$1@gioia.aioe.org> <op.1pd8g7f7byq249@pvr2.lan>
<tau4cc$ka$1@gioia.aioe.org> <jjftssF858aU1@mid.individual.net>
<tavo9k$q9s$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net GO+weOyiIBqiqO2pt+LlKwyl7ueUCm3ffrJRoM798j4NiDDiC4
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ZO1TTgJ6V/JJ76fhUR0dxEPL8KQ=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/91.11.0
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <tavo9k$q9s$1@gioia.aioe.org>
 by: Sylvia Else - Sun, 17 Jul 2022 01:31 UTC

On 17-July-22 11:22 am, Max wrote:
> On 16/07/2022 11:48 pm, Sylvia Else wrote:
>> On 16-July-22 8:36 pm, Max wrote:
>>> On 16/07/2022 7:54 pm, Rod Speed wrote:
>>>> Max <max@val.morgan> wrote
>>>>> Sylvia Else wrote
>>>>>> Max wrote
>>>>
>>>>>>> If an organisation is cutting back employees, and Person A is
>>>>>>> sacked, could Person A claim that Person B should have been
>>>>>>> sacked instead because Person A has been at the organisation longer?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Would there be a basis for this sort of claim in law?
>>>>>>  No.
>>>>>
>>>>> If an organisation has to sack someone and they choose to sack the
>>>>> more experienced employee, how could that be fair?
>>>>
>>>> It isn't about fair. It can make sense to do that if they are paid
>>>> more.
>>>>
>>>> Happens all the time in the fast food industry because new kids are
>>>> cheaper.
>>>
>>> I mean if all other things are equal.
>>>
>>> If both employees are paid equal and there are no promotions
>>> forthcoming to either employee, then if the more experienced employee
>>> is dismissed, that would be unfair.
>>
>> The meaning of "unfair" in this context is defined by the applicable
>> legislation.
>>
>> <www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/legis/cth/consol_act/fwa2009114/s385.html>
>>
>
> The words in that section are "harsh, unjust or unreasonable".
>
> If a person is sacked instead of someone with less experience, then I
> would say that it equates to the words above.

Section 386 then discusses what constitutes harsh, etc.

Sylvia.

Re: unfair dismissal

<31c3038f-3ad6-4136-ae2b-41d34befe8c6n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=6754&group=aus.legal#6754

  copy link   Newsgroups: aus.legal
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:290d:b0:6b5:cecc:1cab with SMTP id m13-20020a05620a290d00b006b5cecc1cabmr6135943qkp.465.1658021838051;
Sat, 16 Jul 2022 18:37:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:4e93:0:b0:31e:e203:83ae with SMTP id
19-20020ac84e93000000b0031ee20383aemr5474068qtp.85.1658021837892; Sat, 16 Jul
2022 18:37:17 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: aus.legal
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2022 18:37:17 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <tavoap$q9s$2@gioia.aioe.org>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=27.33.15.70; posting-account=B_tJMAoAAAAmar-1r2H3x4CMhbFEou3n
NNTP-Posting-Host: 27.33.15.70
References: <tato7j$16h6$1@gioia.aioe.org> <jjfcvaF5go9U1@mid.individual.net>
<tau1is$ta8$1@gioia.aioe.org> <op.1pd8g7f7byq249@pvr2.lan>
<tau4cc$ka$1@gioia.aioe.org> <jjftssF858aU1@mid.individual.net>
<06d61e49-429e-422d-8fa3-7feb471abbban@googlegroups.com> <tavoap$q9s$2@gioia.aioe.org>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <31c3038f-3ad6-4136-ae2b-41d34befe8c6n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: unfair dismissal
From: palliso...@gmail.com (Phil Allison)
Injection-Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2022 01:37:18 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 28
 by: Phil Allison - Sun, 17 Jul 2022 01:37 UTC

Max the brain dead TRoll wrote:

=====================
>>
> >> The meaning of "unfair" in this context is defined by the applicable
> >> legislation.
> >>
> >> <www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/legis/cth/consol_act/fwa2009114/s385.html>
> >>
> >
> > ** What if any is the mechanism for redress if you are unfairly dismissed ?
> > Can you get your job back or maybe compensation ?
>
> Often it would be compensation. Maybe 6-12 months of salary.
>

** Fuck off - wog LIAR.

FYI "mechanism" = what court or tribunal adjudicates the issue.

...... Phil

Re: unfair dismissal

<jjh7juFeh1jU1@mid.individual.net>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=6755&group=aus.legal#6755

  copy link   Newsgroups: aus.legal
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.goja.nl.eu.org!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: syl...@email.invalid (Sylvia Else)
Newsgroups: aus.legal
Subject: Re: unfair dismissal
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2022 11:40:12 +1000
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <jjh7juFeh1jU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <tato7j$16h6$1@gioia.aioe.org> <jjfcvaF5go9U1@mid.individual.net>
<tau1is$ta8$1@gioia.aioe.org> <op.1pd8g7f7byq249@pvr2.lan>
<tau4cc$ka$1@gioia.aioe.org> <jjftssF858aU1@mid.individual.net>
<06d61e49-429e-422d-8fa3-7feb471abbban@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net g/EvvQdVQApf3isp+9xacAjMD/yWodpSq7rCFeZNZkSzbzZHn7
Cancel-Lock: sha1:5bpvtZcLUMXbjoRyFHkPfzXtuGo=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/91.11.0
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <06d61e49-429e-422d-8fa3-7feb471abbban@googlegroups.com>
 by: Sylvia Else - Sun, 17 Jul 2022 01:40 UTC

On 17-July-22 8:52 am, Phil Allison wrote:
> Sylvia Else wrote:
> ==============
>>
>> The meaning of "unfair" in this context is defined by the applicable
>> legislation.
>>
>> <www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/legis/cth/consol_act/fwa2009114/s385.html>
>>
>
> ** What if any is the mechanism for redress if you are unfairly dismissed ?
> Can you get your job back or maybe compensation ?
> Once was easy enough to do, but IIRC John Howard stymied it.
> Googling the topic was unfruitful.
>
>
>
> ...... Phil

Well, section 391 allows for reinstatement, but I would have thought it
would be rare for that to be a practical solution. There may, I suppose,
be cases where the unfair dismissal was a result of procedures in a
large company, but most unfair dismissals would probably involve some
sort of personal conflicts which would still be there after a reinstatement.

Section 392 provides for compensation.

Sylvia.

Re: unfair dismissal

<op.1pfgytsdbyq249@pvr2.lan>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=6756&group=aus.legal#6756

  copy link   Newsgroups: aus.legal
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!news.mixmin.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!lilly.ping.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: rod.spee...@gmail.com (Rod Speed)
Newsgroups: aus.legal
Subject: Re: unfair dismissal
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2022 11:55:31 +1000
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <op.1pfgytsdbyq249@pvr2.lan>
References: <tato7j$16h6$1@gioia.aioe.org> <jjfcvaF5go9U1@mid.individual.net>
<tau1is$ta8$1@gioia.aioe.org> <op.1pd8g7f7byq249@pvr2.lan>
<tau4cc$ka$1@gioia.aioe.org> <jjftssF858aU1@mid.individual.net>
<06d61e49-429e-422d-8fa3-7feb471abbban@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net wejijN9PtysuEVZXTRyuzwmxeaEZLh10rz8ZPK+ZwC1bjyCpg=
Cancel-Lock: sha1:X0TS626IFSizXNJvFw+IlLNrdGc=
User-Agent: Opera Mail/1.0 (Win32)
 by: Rod Speed - Sun, 17 Jul 2022 01:55 UTC

Phil Allison <pallison49@gmail.com> wrote
> Sylvia Else wrote

>> The meaning of "unfair" in this context is defined by the applicable
>> legislation.
>
>> <www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/legis/cth/consol_act/fwa2009114/s385.html>

> What if any is the mechanism for redress if you are unfairly dismissed ?

Same as it has always been.

> Can you get your job back or maybe compensation ?

Yep.

> Once was easy enough to do,

Easy enough to make a claim, not so easy to substantiate the claim.

> but IIRC John Howard stymied it.

Bullshit. It isn't even a federal matter, fool.

> Googling the topic was unfruitful.

Because you are too stupid to do that.

Re: unfair dismissal

<op.1pfhayfjbyq249@pvr2.lan>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=6758&group=aus.legal#6758

  copy link   Newsgroups: aus.legal
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!news.uzoreto.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: rod.spee...@gmail.com (Rod Speed)
Newsgroups: aus.legal
Subject: Re: unfair dismissal
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2022 12:02:48 +1000
Lines: 46
Message-ID: <op.1pfhayfjbyq249@pvr2.lan>
References: <tato7j$16h6$1@gioia.aioe.org> <jjfcvaF5go9U1@mid.individual.net>
<tau1is$ta8$1@gioia.aioe.org> <op.1pd8g7f7byq249@pvr2.lan>
<tau4cc$ka$1@gioia.aioe.org> <jjftssF858aU1@mid.individual.net>
<tavo9k$q9s$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net iI3+aMuJ/5yJmCvH7lXlvwmx5Zl2SL/rE5rhKvIB91r3X9Snw=
Cancel-Lock: sha1:6G85+yjP99lQ67XMgcKn23/InUQ=
User-Agent: Opera Mail/1.0 (Win32)
 by: Rod Speed - Sun, 17 Jul 2022 02:02 UTC

On Sun, 17 Jul 2022 11:22:57 +1000, Max <max@val.morgan> wrote:

> On 16/07/2022 11:48 pm, Sylvia Else wrote:
>> On 16-July-22 8:36 pm, Max wrote:
>>> On 16/07/2022 7:54 pm, Rod Speed wrote:
>>>> Max <max@val.morgan> wrote
>>>>> Sylvia Else wrote
>>>>>> Max wrote
>>>>
>>>>>>> If an organisation is cutting back employees, and Person A is
>>>>>>> sacked, could Person A claim that Person B should have been sacked
>>>>>>> instead because Person A has been at the organisation longer?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Would there be a basis for this sort of claim in law?
>>>>>> No.
>>>>>
>>>>> If an organisation has to sack someone and they choose to sack the
>>>>> more experienced employee, how could that be fair?
>>>>
>>>> It isn't about fair. It can make sense to do that if they are paid
>>>> more.
>>>>
>>>> Happens all the time in the fast food industry because new kids are
>>>> cheaper.
>>>
>>> I mean if all other things are equal.
>>>
>>> If both employees are paid equal and there are no promotions
>>> forthcoming to either employee, then if the more experienced employee
>>> is dismissed, that would be unfair.
>> The meaning of "unfair" in this context is defined by the applicable
>> legislation.
>>
>> <www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/legis/cth/consol_act/fwa2009114/s385.html>
>
> The words in that section are "harsh, unjust or unreasonable".

Yes, the employer is free to choose to sack someone else who
isnt as useful to the operation. And so they should be too.

> If a person is sacked instead of someone with less experience, then I
> would say that it equates to the words above.

Mpre fool you, it doesnt. Particularly if you are more experienced
in terms of time working for that employer but not as useful in other
respects like being harder to get on with or being a clock watcher etc,

Re: unfair dismissal

<op.1pfhglr2byq249@pvr2.lan>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=6759&group=aus.legal#6759

  copy link   Newsgroups: aus.legal
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.goja.nl.eu.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!lilly.ping.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: rod.spee...@gmail.com (Rod Speed)
Newsgroups: aus.legal
Subject: Re: unfair dismissal
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2022 12:06:11 +1000
Lines: 53
Message-ID: <op.1pfhglr2byq249@pvr2.lan>
References: <tato7j$16h6$1@gioia.aioe.org> <jjfcvaF5go9U1@mid.individual.net>
<tau1is$ta8$1@gioia.aioe.org> <op.1pd8g7f7byq249@pvr2.lan>
<tau4cc$ka$1@gioia.aioe.org> <op.1peu8610byq249@pvr2.lan>
<tavokn$tdd$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net kRpvhc6CVF3+dXOUKwLYDgcVQiVwlVDbaU5zNNZf2uYh92eZI=
Cancel-Lock: sha1:nTDG+Ydv8U7++iho1CcTVQri/u0=
User-Agent: Opera Mail/1.0 (Win32)
 by: Rod Speed - Sun, 17 Jul 2022 02:06 UTC

Max <max@val.morgan> wrote
> Rod Speed wrote
>> Max <max@val.morgan> wrote
>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>> Max <max@val.morgan> wrote
>>>>> Sylvia Else wrote
>>>>>> Max wrote

>>>>>>> If an organisation is cutting back employees, and Person A is
>>>>>>> sacked, could Person A claim that Person B should have been sacked
>>>>>>> instead because Person A has been at the organisation longer?

>>>>>>> Would there be a basis for this sort of claim in law?

>>>>>> No.

>>>>> If an organisation has to sack someone and they choose to sack the
>>>>> more experienced employee, how could that be fair?

>>>> It isn't about fair. It can make sense to do that if they are paid
>>>> more.

>>>> Happens all the time in the fast food industry because new kids are
>>>> cheaper.

>>> I mean if all other things are equal.
>> They never are. There are far too many variables for that.
>> The other obvious variables are how pleasant their personality is,
>> how reliable they are, whether they are a union nit picker etc etc etc.

>>> If both employees are paid equal and there are no promotions
>>> forthcoming to either employee, then if the more experienced employee
>>> is dismissed, that would be unfair.

>> Wrong if they are more useful to the employer or just more pleasant to
>> be around etc.

> If they were not pleasant to be around, why weren't they sacked before
> then?

Because quite a bit of the time it isnt that easy to find a better
employee.

> It is not just or reasonable for an employer to sack a more experienced
> person, just because they might like the other person a bit more, when
> this does not affect the person's effectiveness in the job.

But it does affect a person's effectiveness in the job.

> Clearly they must be effective otherwise they would have been sacked and
> wouldn't have kept the job for so long.

Wrong, as always.

Re: unfair dismissal

<tavqsu$1gqb$1@gioia.aioe.org>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=6760&group=aus.legal#6760

  copy link   Newsgroups: aus.legal
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!y5+HOOoKIMtxjCZfPYnWgA.user.46.165.242.91.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: max...@val.morgan (Max)
Newsgroups: aus.legal
Subject: Re: unfair dismissal
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2022 12:07:22 +1000
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <tavqsu$1gqb$1@gioia.aioe.org>
References: <tato7j$16h6$1@gioia.aioe.org> <jjfcvaF5go9U1@mid.individual.net>
<tau1is$ta8$1@gioia.aioe.org> <op.1pd8g7f7byq249@pvr2.lan>
<tau4cc$ka$1@gioia.aioe.org> <jjftssF858aU1@mid.individual.net>
<06d61e49-429e-422d-8fa3-7feb471abbban@googlegroups.com>
<tavoap$q9s$2@gioia.aioe.org>
<31c3038f-3ad6-4136-ae2b-41d34befe8c6n@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="49995"; posting-host="y5+HOOoKIMtxjCZfPYnWgA.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/91.11.0
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
 by: Max - Sun, 17 Jul 2022 02:07 UTC

On 17/07/2022 11:37 am, Phil Allison wrote:
> Max the brain dead TRoll wrote:
>
> =====================
>>>
>>>> The meaning of "unfair" in this context is defined by the applicable
>>>> legislation.
>>>>
>>>> <www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/legis/cth/consol_act/fwa2009114/s385.html>
>>>>
>>>
>>> ** What if any is the mechanism for redress if you are unfairly dismissed ?
>>> Can you get your job back or maybe compensation ?
>>
>> Often it would be compensation. Maybe 6-12 months of salary.
>>
>
>
> FYI "mechanism" = what court or tribunal adjudicates the issue.
>

What you expect as an answer is not the slightest bit of my concern.

I post whatever I want, whenever I want.

Re: unfair dismissal

<2df04a09-2213-465a-af11-cd680bf675f5n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=6761&group=aus.legal#6761

  copy link   Newsgroups: aus.legal
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:20af:b0:473:59cb:c5df with SMTP id 15-20020a05621420af00b0047359cbc5dfmr16636203qvd.122.1658025209047;
Sat, 16 Jul 2022 19:33:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:430b:b0:6ac:9e8a:b2ad with SMTP id
u11-20020a05620a430b00b006ac9e8ab2admr13894159qko.422.1658025208893; Sat, 16
Jul 2022 19:33:28 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: aus.legal
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2022 19:33:28 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <tavqsu$1gqb$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=27.33.15.70; posting-account=B_tJMAoAAAAmar-1r2H3x4CMhbFEou3n
NNTP-Posting-Host: 27.33.15.70
References: <tato7j$16h6$1@gioia.aioe.org> <jjfcvaF5go9U1@mid.individual.net>
<tau1is$ta8$1@gioia.aioe.org> <op.1pd8g7f7byq249@pvr2.lan>
<tau4cc$ka$1@gioia.aioe.org> <jjftssF858aU1@mid.individual.net>
<06d61e49-429e-422d-8fa3-7feb471abbban@googlegroups.com> <tavoap$q9s$2@gioia.aioe.org>
<31c3038f-3ad6-4136-ae2b-41d34befe8c6n@googlegroups.com> <tavqsu$1gqb$1@gioia.aioe.org>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <2df04a09-2213-465a-af11-cd680bf675f5n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: unfair dismissal
From: palliso...@gmail.com (Phil Allison)
Injection-Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2022 02:33:29 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 17
 by: Phil Allison - Sun, 17 Jul 2022 02:33 UTC

Max the brain dead TRoll wrote:
=====================

> >
> > FYI "mechanism" = what court or tribunal adjudicates the issue.
> >
> What you expect as an answer is not the slightest bit of my concern.

** LOL - the troll's moto.

> I post whatever I want, whenever I want.

** The raving lunatic's motto.

FOAD .

Re: unfair dismissal

<f84fc6fa-9ba2-4518-8c4b-3a6bc5dbdf10n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=6763&group=aus.legal#6763

  copy link   Newsgroups: aus.legal
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:408c:b0:6b2:678c:6091 with SMTP id f12-20020a05620a408c00b006b2678c6091mr13971278qko.518.1658025814783;
Sat, 16 Jul 2022 19:43:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:7d42:0:b0:31e:c4f8:4979 with SMTP id
h2-20020ac87d42000000b0031ec4f84979mr17234155qtb.293.1658025814626; Sat, 16
Jul 2022 19:43:34 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: aus.legal
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2022 19:43:34 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <op.1pfgytsdbyq249@pvr2.lan>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=27.33.15.70; posting-account=B_tJMAoAAAAmar-1r2H3x4CMhbFEou3n
NNTP-Posting-Host: 27.33.15.70
References: <tato7j$16h6$1@gioia.aioe.org> <jjfcvaF5go9U1@mid.individual.net>
<tau1is$ta8$1@gioia.aioe.org> <op.1pd8g7f7byq249@pvr2.lan>
<tau4cc$ka$1@gioia.aioe.org> <jjftssF858aU1@mid.individual.net>
<06d61e49-429e-422d-8fa3-7feb471abbban@googlegroups.com> <op.1pfgytsdbyq249@pvr2.lan>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <f84fc6fa-9ba2-4518-8c4b-3a6bc5dbdf10n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: unfair dismissal
From: palliso...@gmail.com (Phil Allison)
Injection-Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2022 02:43:34 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Received-Bytes: 2255
 by: Phil Allison - Sun, 17 Jul 2022 02:43 UTC

On Sunday, July 17, 2022 at 11:55:38 AM UTC+10, Rod Speed wrote:
> Phil Allison <palli...@gmail.com> wrote
> > Sylvia Else wrote
> >> The meaning of "unfair" in this context is defined by the applicable
> >> legislation.
> >
> >> <www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/legis/cth/consol_act/fwa2009114/s385.html>
> > What if any is the mechanism for redress if you are unfairly dismissed ?
> Same as it has always been.

** Ridiculous bullshit.

> > Once was easy enough to do,
> Easy enough to make a claim, not so easy to substantiate the claim.

** No, was easy to get compensation in the 1980's

> > but IIRC John Howard stymied it.
>
> Bullshit.

** He did, by eliminating businesses with less than 100 employees.

> It isn't even a federal matter, fool.

** Yes it is, keeps changing too.

NSW has a Fair Work Commission, but you must be employed for 12 months for a small business.

...... Phil

Re: unfair dismissal

<op.1pfj6t2dbyq249@pvr2.lan>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=6766&group=aus.legal#6766

  copy link   Newsgroups: aus.legal
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.goja.nl.eu.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!lilly.ping.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: rod.spee...@gmail.com (Rod Speed)
Newsgroups: aus.legal
Subject: Re: unfair dismissal
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2022 13:05:07 +1000
Lines: 55
Message-ID: <op.1pfj6t2dbyq249@pvr2.lan>
References: <tato7j$16h6$1@gioia.aioe.org> <jjfcvaF5go9U1@mid.individual.net>
<tau1is$ta8$1@gioia.aioe.org> <op.1pd8g7f7byq249@pvr2.lan>
<tau4cc$ka$1@gioia.aioe.org> <jjftssF858aU1@mid.individual.net>
<06d61e49-429e-422d-8fa3-7feb471abbban@googlegroups.com>
<op.1pfgytsdbyq249@pvr2.lan>
<f84fc6fa-9ba2-4518-8c4b-3a6bc5dbdf10n@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net mYbnJu/e7Vynj3gL/3yO+Q3fGmXD2uv06b0Nrj4cANp4DkOLg=
Cancel-Lock: sha1:rf/ZsREBvQuuY1/+SB4dC7FSXsc=
User-Agent: Opera Mail/1.0 (Win32)
 by: Rod Speed - Sun, 17 Jul 2022 03:05 UTC

On Sun, 17 Jul 2022 12:43:34 +1000, Phil Allison <pallison49@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Sunday, July 17, 2022 at 11:55:38 AM UTC+10, Rod Speed wrote:
>> Phil Allison <palli...@gmail.com> wrote
>> > Sylvia Else wrote
>> >> The meaning of "unfair" in this context is defined by the applicable
>> >> legislation.
>> >
>> >>
>> <www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/legis/cth/consol_act/fwa2009114/s385.html>
>> > What if any is the mechanism for redress if you are unfairly
>> dismissed ?

>> Same as it has always been.

> Ridiculous bullshit.

Your sig is sposed to be last with a line with just -- on it in front of
it.

>> > Once was easy enough to do,

>> Easy enough to make a claim, not so easy to substantiate the claim.

> No,

Fraid so.

> was easy to get compensation in the 1980's

Bullshit.

>> > but IIRC John Howard stymied it.

>> Bullshit.

> He did, by eliminating businesses with less than 100 employees.

Bullshit he did.

> > It isn't even a federal matter, fool.

> Yes it is,

Bullshit it is.

> keeps changing too.

Bullshit.

> NSW has a Fair Work Commission, but you must be employed for 12 months
> for a small business.

Which most are, fuckwit.

Re: unfair dismissal

<tavv5q$qi3$1@gioia.aioe.org>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=6767&group=aus.legal#6767

  copy link   Newsgroups: aus.legal
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!y5+HOOoKIMtxjCZfPYnWgA.user.46.165.242.91.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: max...@val.morgan (Max)
Newsgroups: aus.legal
Subject: Re: unfair dismissal
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2022 13:20:23 +1000
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <tavv5q$qi3$1@gioia.aioe.org>
References: <tato7j$16h6$1@gioia.aioe.org> <jjfcvaF5go9U1@mid.individual.net>
<tau1is$ta8$1@gioia.aioe.org> <op.1pd8g7f7byq249@pvr2.lan>
<tau4cc$ka$1@gioia.aioe.org> <jjftssF858aU1@mid.individual.net>
<tavo9k$q9s$1@gioia.aioe.org> <op.1pfhayfjbyq249@pvr2.lan>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="27203"; posting-host="y5+HOOoKIMtxjCZfPYnWgA.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/91.11.0
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
 by: Max - Sun, 17 Jul 2022 03:20 UTC

On 17/07/2022 12:02 pm, Rod Speed wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Jul 2022 11:22:57 +1000, Max <max@val.morgan> wrote:
>
>> On 16/07/2022 11:48 pm, Sylvia Else wrote:
>>> On 16-July-22 8:36 pm, Max wrote:
>>>> On 16/07/2022 7:54 pm, Rod Speed wrote:
>>>>> Max <max@val.morgan> wrote
>>>>>> Sylvia Else wrote
>>>>>>> Max wrote
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If an organisation is cutting back employees, and Person A is
>>>>>>>> sacked, could Person A claim that Person B should have been
>>>>>>>> sacked instead because Person A has been at the organisation
>>>>>>>> longer?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Would there be a basis for this sort of claim in law?
>>>>>>>  No.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If an organisation has to sack someone and they choose to sack the
>>>>>> more experienced employee, how could that be fair?
>>>>>
>>>>> It isn't about fair. It can make sense to do that if they are paid
>>>>> more.
>>>>>
>>>>> Happens all the time in the fast food industry because new kids are
>>>>> cheaper.
>>>>
>>>> I mean if all other things are equal.
>>>>
>>>> If both employees are paid equal and there are no promotions
>>>> forthcoming to either employee, then if the more experienced
>>>> employee is dismissed, that would be unfair.
>>>  The meaning of "unfair" in this context is defined by the applicable
>>> legislation.
>>>  <www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/legis/cth/consol_act/fwa2009114/s385.html>
>>>
>>
>> The words in that section are "harsh, unjust or unreasonable".
>
> Yes, the employer is free to choose to sack someone else who
> isnt as useful to the operation. And so they should be too.
>

If the two employees are equally useful, then it would be unjust to sack
the more experienced employee just because the employer likes the other
person more.

>> If a person is sacked instead of someone with less experience, then I
>> would say that it equates to the words above.
>
> Mpre fool you, it doesnt. Particularly if you are more experienced
> in terms of time working for that employer but not as useful in other
> respects like being harder to get on with or being a clock watcher etc,

Neither of those things makes up for being less experienced. Experience
in a workplace is worth a lot more.

Therefore, it would be unjust to sack someone who is more experienced.
Clearly the employer would be unfairly allowing a personal prejudice to
affect the decision.


aus+uk / aus.legal / unfair dismissal

Pages:12345
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.81
clearnet tor