Sometimes I'm prompted to sign documents and this seems to happen in
two ways.

I scan my usual signature and attach it to the email, or I select one
of several "signatures" supplied by the sender and this selection
attaches itself to the signature field(s) of the document.

Does one type outrank the other?

Are these electronic signatures binding, and are they as good as the
old manual type?

And Voiceprints; what about these?

And scanned images of drivers licences, are these as good as
signatures?

Confused.

Peter Jason is a PITA Troll wrote:

=============================
> Sometimes I'm prompted to sign documents and this seems to happen in
> two ways.
>
> I scan my usual signature and attach it to the email,

** Print the email and sign it manually.
Return an image of the signed doc.

The deal is in the hands of the party who created the doc.

> or I select one
> of several "signatures" supplied by the sender and this selection
> attaches itself to the signature field(s) of the document.
>
> Does one type outrank the other?
>

** You do know how to use Google ?

....... Phil

On Sun, 24 Jul 2022 17:15:49 -0700 (PDT), Phil Allison
<pallison49@gmail.com> wrote:

> Peter Jason is a PITA Troll wrote:
>
>=============================
>> Sometimes I'm prompted to sign documents and this seems to happen in
>> two ways.
>>
>> I scan my usual signature and attach it to the email,
>
>** Print the email and sign it manually.
Thank you, but what about a 56-page annual return?
> Return an image of the signed doc.
>
> The deal is in the hands of the party who created the doc.
Thanx, does this mean the document is mine if I print it out?
>
>> or I select one
>> of several "signatures" supplied by the sender and this selection
>> attaches itself to the signature field(s) of the document.
>>
>> Does one type outrank the other?
>>
>
> ** You do know how to use Google ?
Only in extremis. Google is very confusing.
>
>
>
>...... Phil

Peter Jason wrote:
================
>
> >> Sometimes I'm prompted to sign documents and this seems to happen in
> >> two ways.
> >>
> >> I scan my usual signature and attach it to the email,
> >
> >** Print the email and sign it manually.

> Thank you, but what about a 56-page annual return?

** FFS you sign one page.

> > Return an image of the signed doc.
> >
> > The deal is in the hands of the party who created the doc.
>
> Thanx, does this mean the document is mine if I print it out?

** Go fuck a dead donkey.

> > ** You do know how to use Google ?

> Only in extremis.

** Fucking mental retard.

On Sun, 24 Jul 2022 18:41:29 -0700 (PDT), Phil Allison
<pallison49@gmail.com> wrote:

>Peter Jason wrote:
>================
>>
>> >> Sometimes I'm prompted to sign documents and this seems to happen in
>> >> two ways.
>> >>
>> >> I scan my usual signature and attach it to the email,
>> >
>> >** Print the email and sign it manually.
>
>> Thank you, but what about a 56-page annual return?
>
>** FFS you sign one page.
>
>> > Return an image of the signed doc.
>> >
>> > The deal is in the hands of the party who created the doc.
>>
>> Thanx, does this mean the document is mine if I print it out?
>
>** Go fuck a dead donkey.

-------done that, now what?
>
>
>> > ** You do know how to use Google ?
>
>> Only in extremis.
>
>** Fucking mental retard.
>

Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> wrote

> Sometimes I'm prompted to sign documents and this seems to happen in
> two ways.

> I scan my usual signature and attach it to the email,

> or I select one of several "signatures" supplied by the sender andthis
> selection attaches itself to the signature field(s) of the document.

Neverhad one of those.

> Does one type outrank the other?

Nope.

> Are these electronic signatures binding,

Yep.

> and are they as good as the old manual type?

Yep.

> And Voiceprints; what about these?

They are fine too.

> And scanned images of drivers licences,are these as good as signatures?

Depends on who it is who wants it.

The digital ones are fine for the cops when they stop you.

> Confused.

Typical wog.