Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

19 May, 2024: Line wrapping has been changed to be more consistent with Usenet standards.
 If you find that it is broken please let me know here rocksolid.nodes.help


aus+uk / aus.legal / Re: Electronic signatures.

SubjectAuthor
* Electronic signatures.Peter Jason
+* Re: Electronic signatures.Phil Allison
|`* Re: Electronic signatures.Peter Jason
| `* Re: Electronic signatures.Phil Allison
|  `- Re: Electronic signatures.Peter Jason
`- Re: Electronic signatures.Rod Speed

1
Electronic signatures.

<0hlrdh9hpcnvs2umuj57cgce6eljilfceg@4ax.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=6897&group=aus.legal#6897

  copy link   Newsgroups: aus.legal
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: pj...@jostle.com (Peter Jason)
Newsgroups: aus.legal
Subject: Electronic signatures.
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2022 09:36:35 +1000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <0hlrdh9hpcnvs2umuj57cgce6eljilfceg@4ax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="cb69b37387cb21beecb88c77edc7be35";
logging-data="944309"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18/Qmh+MA9exZSvj1cRihP2"
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
Cancel-Lock: sha1:F8ELBUFJnNxfVpksq3gdl+7BbH8=
 by: Peter Jason - Sun, 24 Jul 2022 23:36 UTC

Sometimes I'm prompted to sign documents and this seems to happen in
two ways.

I scan my usual signature and attach it to the email, or I select one
of several "signatures" supplied by the sender and this selection
attaches itself to the signature field(s) of the document.

Does one type outrank the other?

Are these electronic signatures binding, and are they as good as the
old manual type?

And Voiceprints; what about these?

And scanned images of drivers licences, are these as good as
signatures?

Confused.

Re: Electronic signatures.

<b3641494-4e8c-47ba-b2cb-2c114481204en@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=6898&group=aus.legal#6898

  copy link   Newsgroups: aus.legal
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:11d6:b0:31f:1251:9c7c with SMTP id n22-20020a05622a11d600b0031f12519c7cmr8610117qtk.306.1658708149926;
Sun, 24 Jul 2022 17:15:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:238b:b0:473:358:ddf4 with SMTP id
fw11-20020a056214238b00b004730358ddf4mr8817105qvb.66.1658708149710; Sun, 24
Jul 2022 17:15:49 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: aus.legal
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2022 17:15:49 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <0hlrdh9hpcnvs2umuj57cgce6eljilfceg@4ax.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=124.150.77.201; posting-account=B_tJMAoAAAAmar-1r2H3x4CMhbFEou3n
NNTP-Posting-Host: 124.150.77.201
References: <0hlrdh9hpcnvs2umuj57cgce6eljilfceg@4ax.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <b3641494-4e8c-47ba-b2cb-2c114481204en@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Electronic signatures.
From: palliso...@gmail.com (Phil Allison)
Injection-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2022 00:15:49 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Received-Bytes: 1728
 by: Phil Allison - Mon, 25 Jul 2022 00:15 UTC

Peter Jason is a PITA Troll wrote:

=============================
> Sometimes I'm prompted to sign documents and this seems to happen in
> two ways.
>
> I scan my usual signature and attach it to the email,

** Print the email and sign it manually.
Return an image of the signed doc.

The deal is in the hands of the party who created the doc.

> or I select one
> of several "signatures" supplied by the sender and this selection
> attaches itself to the signature field(s) of the document.
>
> Does one type outrank the other?
>

** You do know how to use Google ?

....... Phil

Re: Electronic signatures.

<6oprdhpi5imd2j0657co89cv3js0044ive@4ax.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=6899&group=aus.legal#6899

  copy link   Newsgroups: aus.legal
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: pj...@jostle.com (Peter Jason)
Newsgroups: aus.legal
Subject: Re: Electronic signatures.
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2022 10:46:07 +1000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <6oprdhpi5imd2j0657co89cv3js0044ive@4ax.com>
References: <0hlrdh9hpcnvs2umuj57cgce6eljilfceg@4ax.com> <b3641494-4e8c-47ba-b2cb-2c114481204en@googlegroups.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="cb69b37387cb21beecb88c77edc7be35";
logging-data="966018"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/ydeqFfJUwp0z9OMsJvDif"
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
Cancel-Lock: sha1:xNLya8NhbKP/T/SbNDy0WzaFaDE=
 by: Peter Jason - Mon, 25 Jul 2022 00:46 UTC

On Sun, 24 Jul 2022 17:15:49 -0700 (PDT), Phil Allison
<pallison49@gmail.com> wrote:

> Peter Jason is a PITA Troll wrote:
>
>=============================
>> Sometimes I'm prompted to sign documents and this seems to happen in
>> two ways.
>>
>> I scan my usual signature and attach it to the email,
>
>** Print the email and sign it manually.
Thank you, but what about a 56-page annual return?
> Return an image of the signed doc.
>
> The deal is in the hands of the party who created the doc.
Thanx, does this mean the document is mine if I print it out?
>
>> or I select one
>> of several "signatures" supplied by the sender and this selection
>> attaches itself to the signature field(s) of the document.
>>
>> Does one type outrank the other?
>>
>
> ** You do know how to use Google ?
Only in extremis. Google is very confusing.
>
>
>
>...... Phil

Re: Electronic signatures.

<f8826233-b9de-436c-9abf-761a3fdaccb2n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=6900&group=aus.legal#6900

  copy link   Newsgroups: aus.legal
X-Received: by 2002:a0c:ab54:0:b0:474:7cd:8cd2 with SMTP id i20-20020a0cab54000000b0047407cd8cd2mr8355281qvb.36.1658713290036;
Sun, 24 Jul 2022 18:41:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:1786:b0:31f:2a13:aa05 with SMTP id
s6-20020a05622a178600b0031f2a13aa05mr6407049qtk.505.1658713289861; Sun, 24
Jul 2022 18:41:29 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: aus.legal
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2022 18:41:29 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <6oprdhpi5imd2j0657co89cv3js0044ive@4ax.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=124.150.77.201; posting-account=B_tJMAoAAAAmar-1r2H3x4CMhbFEou3n
NNTP-Posting-Host: 124.150.77.201
References: <0hlrdh9hpcnvs2umuj57cgce6eljilfceg@4ax.com> <b3641494-4e8c-47ba-b2cb-2c114481204en@googlegroups.com>
<6oprdhpi5imd2j0657co89cv3js0044ive@4ax.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <f8826233-b9de-436c-9abf-761a3fdaccb2n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Electronic signatures.
From: palliso...@gmail.com (Phil Allison)
Injection-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2022 01:41:30 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Received-Bytes: 1856
 by: Phil Allison - Mon, 25 Jul 2022 01:41 UTC

Peter Jason wrote:
================
>
> >> Sometimes I'm prompted to sign documents and this seems to happen in
> >> two ways.
> >>
> >> I scan my usual signature and attach it to the email,
> >
> >** Print the email and sign it manually.

> Thank you, but what about a 56-page annual return?

** FFS you sign one page.

> > Return an image of the signed doc.
> >
> > The deal is in the hands of the party who created the doc.
>
> Thanx, does this mean the document is mine if I print it out?

** Go fuck a dead donkey.


> > ** You do know how to use Google ?

> Only in extremis.

** Fucking mental retard.

Re: Electronic signatures.

<tetrdhpms63a73qfbjh6jcebfjj953kt9v@4ax.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=6901&group=aus.legal#6901

  copy link   Newsgroups: aus.legal
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: pj...@jostle.com (Peter Jason)
Newsgroups: aus.legal
Subject: Re: Electronic signatures.
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2022 11:46:41 +1000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 34
Message-ID: <tetrdhpms63a73qfbjh6jcebfjj953kt9v@4ax.com>
References: <0hlrdh9hpcnvs2umuj57cgce6eljilfceg@4ax.com> <b3641494-4e8c-47ba-b2cb-2c114481204en@googlegroups.com> <6oprdhpi5imd2j0657co89cv3js0044ive@4ax.com> <f8826233-b9de-436c-9abf-761a3fdaccb2n@googlegroups.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="cb69b37387cb21beecb88c77edc7be35";
logging-data="1076420"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19oInOQTR69cWF/BvzS+S76"
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
Cancel-Lock: sha1:1Ie6ftDUDde+QS8bhmPA9YDWRZA=
 by: Peter Jason - Mon, 25 Jul 2022 01:46 UTC

On Sun, 24 Jul 2022 18:41:29 -0700 (PDT), Phil Allison
<pallison49@gmail.com> wrote:

>Peter Jason wrote:
>================
>>
>> >> Sometimes I'm prompted to sign documents and this seems to happen in
>> >> two ways.
>> >>
>> >> I scan my usual signature and attach it to the email,
>> >
>> >** Print the email and sign it manually.
>
>> Thank you, but what about a 56-page annual return?
>
>** FFS you sign one page.
>
>> > Return an image of the signed doc.
>> >
>> > The deal is in the hands of the party who created the doc.
>>
>> Thanx, does this mean the document is mine if I print it out?
>
>** Go fuck a dead donkey.

-------done that, now what?
>
>
>> > ** You do know how to use Google ?
>
>> Only in extremis.
>
>** Fucking mental retard.
>

Re: Electronic signatures.

<op.1puhmmvrbyq249@pvr2.lan>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=6903&group=aus.legal#6903

  copy link   Newsgroups: aus.legal
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!news.uzoreto.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: rod.spee...@gmail.com (Rod Speed)
Newsgroups: aus.legal
Subject: Re: Electronic signatures.
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2022 14:33:48 +1000
Lines: 37
Message-ID: <op.1puhmmvrbyq249@pvr2.lan>
References: <0hlrdh9hpcnvs2umuj57cgce6eljilfceg@4ax.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net CyTSgG4GgXbaq3Qr7D/klgjGf9Bkf/u1dVsj2cJZ0gUxJ1Flc=
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ZDb/ME19ke8heYVEDbp8FbfH7Us=
User-Agent: Opera Mail/1.0 (Win32)
 by: Rod Speed - Mon, 25 Jul 2022 04:33 UTC

Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> wrote

> Sometimes I'm prompted to sign documents and this seems to happen in
> two ways.

> I scan my usual signature and attach it to the email,

> or I select one of several "signatures" supplied by the sender andthis
> selection attaches itself to the signature field(s) of the document.

Neverhad one of those.

> Does one type outrank the other?

Nope.

> Are these electronic signatures binding,

Yep.

> and are they as good as the old manual type?

Yep.

> And Voiceprints; what about these?

They are fine too.

> And scanned images of drivers licences,are these as good as signatures?

Depends on who it is who wants it.

The digital ones are fine for the cops when they stop you.

> Confused.

Typical wog.


aus+uk / aus.legal / Re: Electronic signatures.

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.81
clearnet tor