Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

19 May, 2024: Line wrapping has been changed to be more consistent with Usenet standards.
 If you find that it is broken please let me know here rocksolid.nodes.help


aus+uk / aus.legal / Re: when will Clive Palmer be classed as vexatious litigant?

SubjectAuthor
* when will Clive Palmer be classed as vexatious litigant?Ozix
+- Re: when will Clive Palmer be classed as vexatious litigant?Rod Speed
`* Re: when will Clive Palmer be classed as vexatious litigant?Sylvia Else
 `* Re: when will Clive Palmer be classed as vexatious litigant?Max
  `- Re: when will Clive Palmer be classed as vexatious litigant?Rod Speed

1
when will Clive Palmer be classed as vexatious litigant?

<62e8f68d$1@news.ausics.net>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=6973&group=aus.legal#6973

  copy link   Newsgroups: aus.legal
Newsgroups: aus.legal
X-Mozilla-News-Host: news://news.ausics.net:119
From: ozi...@xizo.am (Ozix)
Subject: when will Clive Palmer be classed as vexatious litigant?
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2022 18:03:57 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
Firefox/68.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.13
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
NNTP-Posting-Host: news.ausics.net
Message-ID: <62e8f68d$1@news.ausics.net>
Organization: Ausics - https://www.ausics.net
Lines: 2
X-Complaints: abuse@ausics.net
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!news.bbs.nz!news.ausics.net!not-for-mail
 by: Ozix - Tue, 2 Aug 2022 10:03 UTC

Judge only gave him $5,000 and said the case was a bloody waste of time.

Re: when will Clive Palmer be classed as vexatious litigant?

<op.1p9q1fy4byq249@pvr2.lan>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=6974&group=aus.legal#6974

  copy link   Newsgroups: aus.legal
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!lilly.ping.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: rod.spee...@gmail.com (Rod Speed)
Newsgroups: aus.legal
Subject: Re: when will Clive Palmer be classed as vexatious litigant?
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2022 20:21:05 +1000
Lines: 9
Message-ID: <op.1p9q1fy4byq249@pvr2.lan>
References: <62e8f68d$1@news.ausics.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net RBdFyi8HaX+UTmvG+m+B2gsEUN7crrzoUouxlLflu05FlFzYU=
Cancel-Lock: sha1:xVooT14Rf2bscSMak2pseeKU+Bs=
User-Agent: Opera Mail/1.0 (Win32)
 by: Rod Speed - Tue, 2 Aug 2022 10:21 UTC

Hard to do that with someone like that.

Ozix <ozix@xizo.am> wrote

> Judge only gave him $5,000 and said the case was a bloody waste of time.

And gave McGowan $25,000

And the legal fees would have been megabucks, quite literally.

Re: when will Clive Palmer be classed as vexatious litigant?

<jksraeFfisuU1@mid.individual.net>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=6975&group=aus.legal#6975

  copy link   Newsgroups: aus.legal
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!news.uzoreto.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: syl...@email.invalid (Sylvia Else)
Newsgroups: aus.legal
Subject: Re: when will Clive Palmer be classed as vexatious litigant?
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2022 00:40:22 +1000
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <jksraeFfisuU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <62e8f68d$1@news.ausics.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net 53/0rr1k/EvdQNb3lC3tuwYfgIONFMx3cxSBkhJtgqpN5cR+cR
Cancel-Lock: sha1:v8G2232s/XnKD4X75iXwe0nHWhY=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/91.11.0
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <62e8f68d$1@news.ausics.net>
 by: Sylvia Else - Tue, 2 Aug 2022 14:40 UTC

On 02-Aug-22 8:03 pm, Ozix wrote:
> Judge only gave him $5,000 and said the case was a bloody waste of time.

The words he used were "The game has not been worth the candle."

Nevertheless there was a finding of defamation and an award of damages.

Of course, Palmer's claim provoked a cross-claim, which in the end
resulted in a greater award of damages against Palmer.

But that doesn't alter the fact that Palmer won his own claim. Given the
small amount of damages, one may question Palmer's wisdom in instituting
the proceeding, but there's nothing to suggest it was vexatious.

http://www7.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/legis/wa/consol_act/vpra2002391/s3.htmls

Sylvia.

Re: when will Clive Palmer be classed as vexatious litigant?

<tcchl3$48i$1@gioia.aioe.org>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=6976&group=aus.legal#6976

  copy link   Newsgroups: aus.legal
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!y5+HOOoKIMtxjCZfPYnWgA.user.46.165.242.91.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: max...@val.morgan (Max)
Newsgroups: aus.legal
Subject: Re: when will Clive Palmer be classed as vexatious litigant?
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2022 11:05:39 +1000
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <tcchl3$48i$1@gioia.aioe.org>
References: <62e8f68d$1@news.ausics.net> <jksraeFfisuU1@mid.individual.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="4370"; posting-host="y5+HOOoKIMtxjCZfPYnWgA.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/91.11.0
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
 by: Max - Wed, 3 Aug 2022 01:05 UTC

On 3/08/2022 12:40 am, Sylvia Else wrote:
> On 02-Aug-22 8:03 pm, Ozix wrote:
>> Judge only gave him $5,000 and said the case was a bloody waste of time.
>
> The words he used were "The game has not been worth the candle."
>
> Nevertheless there was a finding of defamation and an award of damages.
>
> Of course, Palmer's claim provoked a cross-claim, which in the end
> resulted in a greater award of damages against Palmer.
>
> But that doesn't alter the fact that Palmer won his own claim. Given the
> small amount of damages, one may question Palmer's wisdom in instituting
> the proceeding, but there's nothing to suggest it was vexatious.
>
> http://www7.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/legis/wa/consol_act/vpra2002391/s3.htmls
>

How will McGowan pay his legal costs? Will it be paid for by the WA
government?

Re: when will Clive Palmer be classed as vexatious litigant?

<op.1qa5iwd4byq249@pvr2.lan>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=6977&group=aus.legal#6977

  copy link   Newsgroups: aus.legal
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!lilly.ping.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: rod.spee...@gmail.com (Rod Speed)
Newsgroups: aus.legal
Subject: Re: when will Clive Palmer be classed as vexatious litigant?
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2022 14:31:34 +1000
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <op.1qa5iwd4byq249@pvr2.lan>
References: <62e8f68d$1@news.ausics.net> <jksraeFfisuU1@mid.individual.net>
<tcchl3$48i$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net TCDFy9NXDpSy8mv+phln5wGJKoZh/eT4/s2Ca5gE2zg92kao4=
Cancel-Lock: sha1:1/+4HcNdrQkIxp423Kt0Rz1/AUc=
User-Agent: Opera Mail/1.0 (Win32)
 by: Rod Speed - Wed, 3 Aug 2022 04:31 UTC

Max <max@val.morgan> wrote
> Sylvia Else wrote
>> Ozix wrote

>>> Judge only gave him $5,000 and said the case was a bloody waste of
>>> time.

>> The words he used were "The game has not been worth the candle."
>> Nevertheless there was a finding of defamation and an award of damages.
>> Of course, Palmer's claim provoked a cross-claim, which in the end
>> resulted in a greater award of damages against Palmer.
>> But that doesn't alter the fact that Palmer won his own claim. Given
>> the small amount of damages, one may question Palmer's wisdom in
>> instituting the proceeding, but there's nothing to suggest it was
>> vexatious.
>>
>> http://www7.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/legis/wa/consol_act/vpra2002391/s3.htmls
>
> How will McGowan pay his legal costs? Will it be paid for by the WA
> government?

Cprse they will be.


aus+uk / aus.legal / Re: when will Clive Palmer be classed as vexatious litigant?

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.81
clearnet tor