Assume he won't re-contest his seat.

On 19/09/2021 3:49 pm, Dechucka wrote:
> Assume he won't re-contest his seat.

I'd like to think so but I wouldn't bet on it.

On 19/09/2021 5:50 pm, Fran wrote:
> On 19/09/2021 3:49 pm, Dechucka wrote:
>> Assume he won't re-contest his seat.
>
> I'd like to think so but I wouldn't bet on it.

He won't go to a by-election as Labor would win given the WA situation.
I would think his position is untenable to run again given all the
baggage he is carrying,
This should not be the end of the matter a Member of Parliament
accepting a $million still reeks. It should be referred to the Federal
ICAC, OH WAIT a couple of years after we were promised one nothing has
happened.

Dechucka wrote on 19/9/21 6:13 pm:
> On 19/09/2021 5:50 pm, Fran wrote:
>> On 19/09/2021 3:49 pm, Dechucka wrote:
>>> Assume he won't re-contest his seat.
>>
>> I'd like to think so but I wouldn't bet on it.
>
>
> He won't go to a by-election as Labor would win given the WA situation.
> I would think his position is untenable to run again given all the
> baggage he is carrying,
> This should not be the end of the matter a Member of Parliament
> accepting a $million still reeks. It should be referred to the Federal
> ICAC, OH WAIT a couple of years after we were promised one nothing has
> happened.

And, aren't we still waiting for the investigation into Sam Nastari (or
whatever his name is) and his dealing with that Chinese millionaire??
--
Daniel

Daniel65 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote
> Dechucka wrote on 19/9/21 6:13 pm:
>> On 19/09/2021 5:50 pm, Fran wrote:
>>> On 19/09/2021 3:49 pm, Dechucka wrote:
>>>> Assume he won't re-contest his seat.
>>>
>>> I'd like to think so but I wouldn't bet on it.
>>
>>
>> He won't go to a by-election as Labor would win given the WA situation.
>> I would think his position is untenable to run again given all the
>> baggage he is carrying,
>> This should not be the end of the matter a Member of Parliament
>> accepting a $million still reeks. It should be referred to the Federal
>> ICAC, OH WAIT a couple of years after we were promised one nothing has
>> happened.
>
> And, aren't we still waiting for the investigation
> into Sam Nastari (or whatever his name is)

Dastyari.

> and his dealing with that Chinese millionaire??

Nope, he has spelt out what he did and isn't even a polly anymore.

On 19/09/2021 10:42 pm, Daniel65 wrote:
> Dechucka wrote on 19/9/21 6:13 pm:
>> On 19/09/2021 5:50 pm, Fran wrote:
>>> On 19/09/2021 3:49 pm, Dechucka wrote:
>>>> Assume he won't re-contest his seat.
>>>
>>> I'd like to think so but I wouldn't bet on it.
>>
>>
>> He won't go to a by-election as Labor would win given the WA
>> situation. I would think his position is untenable to run again given
>> all the baggage he is carrying,
>> This should not be the end of the matter a Member of Parliament
>> accepting a $million still reeks. It should be referred to the Federal
>> ICAC, OH WAIT a couple of years after we were promised one nothing has
>> happened.
>
> And, aren't we still waiting for the investigation into Sam Nastari (or
> whatever his name is) and his dealing with that Chinese millionaire??

His dealings were out in the open while being very stupid, what is funny
is that Porter led the attack on Dasrari. The difference is that Porter
is a Minister in government who refuses to say where the money came
from. Money does not magically appear in your account you can always
tell were it came from or maybe he got it in a ALDI bag. Either way
AUSTRAC would be interested in the deposit.

Love the use of 'Blind Trust' to try and sanitise receiving the money. I
will suggest very cynically and without basis that Palmer is involved.
This needs a hell of a lot more investigation and not by the PM's Department

Dechucka wrote:
> On 19/09/2021 10:42 pm, Daniel65 wrote:
> His dealings were out in the open while being very stupid, what is funny
> is that Porter led the attack on Dasrari. The difference is that Porter
> is a Minister in government who refuses to say where the money came
> from. Money does not magically appear in your account you can always
> tell were it came from or maybe he got it in a ALDI bag. Either way
> AUSTRAC would be interested in the deposit.
>
> Love the use of 'Blind Trust' to try and sanitise receiving the money. I
> will suggest very cynically and without basis that Palmer is involved.
> This needs a hell of a lot more investigation and not by the PM's
> Department
>

Da, wondering who put the cash into the blind trust. Maybe Porter's
chums from Hale School, now successful and rich? But they would know
this is just wrong. About the only suspect stupid enough to think they
could get away with it is Clive Palmer.

On 20/09/2021 8:26 am, Mikhail Gorbachev wrote:
> Dechucka wrote:
>> On 19/09/2021 10:42 pm, Daniel65 wrote:
>> His dealings were out in the open while being very stupid, what is
>> funny is that Porter led the attack on Dasrari. The difference is that
>> Porter is a Minister in government who refuses to say where the money
>> came from. Money does not magically appear in your account you can
>> always tell were it came from or maybe he got it in a ALDI bag. Either
>> way AUSTRAC would be interested in the deposit.
>>
>> Love the use of 'Blind Trust' to try and sanitise receiving the money.
>> I will suggest very cynically and without basis that Palmer is involved.
>> This needs a hell of a lot more investigation and not by the PM's
>> Department
>>
>
> Da, wondering who put the cash into the blind trust.

It wasn't a blind trust.

> Maybe Porter's
> chums from Hale School, now successful and rich? But they would know
> this is just wrong. About the only suspect stupid enough to think they
> could get away with it is Clive Palmer.

Porter knows where the money came from but is now saying it was given on
basis of confidentiality

https://www.betootaadvocate.com/advocate-in-focus/porter-says-the-only-blind-trust-he-knows-about-is-what-old-people-have-for-the-liberals/

;-)

On Mon, 20 Sep 2021 06:28:46 +1000, Dechucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com>
wrote:

>On 19/09/2021 10:42 pm, Daniel65 wrote:
>> Dechucka wrote on 19/9/21 6:13 pm:
>>> On 19/09/2021 5:50 pm, Fran wrote:
>>>> On 19/09/2021 3:49 pm, Dechucka wrote:
>>>>> Assume he won't re-contest his seat.
>>>>
>>>> I'd like to think so but I wouldn't bet on it.
>>>
>>>
>>> He won't go to a by-election as Labor would win given the WA
>>> situation. I would think his position is untenable to run again given
>>> all the baggage he is carrying,
>>> This should not be the end of the matter a Member of Parliament
>>> accepting a $million still reeks. It should be referred to the Federal
>>> ICAC, OH WAIT a couple of years after we were promised one nothing has
>>> happened.
>>
>> And, aren't we still waiting for the investigation into Sam Nastari (or
>> whatever his name is) and his dealing with that Chinese millionaire??
>
>His dealings were out in the open while being very stupid, what is funny
>is that Porter led the attack on Dasrari. The difference is that Porter
>is a Minister in government who refuses to say where the money came
>from. Money does not magically appear in your account you can always
>tell were it came from or maybe he got it in a ALDI bag. Either way
>AUSTRAC would be interested in the deposit.
>
>Love the use of 'Blind Trust' to try and sanitise receiving the money. I
>will suggest very cynically and without basis that Palmer is involved.
>This needs a hell of a lot more investigation and not by the PM's Department
>
More leftie rubbish
Snarky, smarmy, carping, snide, deceit, distortion, slag offing,
denial, lying, spin, twisting, belittling, Dumb 3 smear merchants!
--
Petzl
We know the Dumb3 are lying,
they know they are lying,
they know we know they are lying,
we know they know we know they are lying,
but they are still lying. Aleksandr Isayevich Solzhenitsyn

On 20/09/2021 8:57 am, Petzl wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Sep 2021 06:28:46 +1000, Dechucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 19/09/2021 10:42 pm, Daniel65 wrote:
>>> Dechucka wrote on 19/9/21 6:13 pm:
>>>> On 19/09/2021 5:50 pm, Fran wrote:
>>>>> On 19/09/2021 3:49 pm, Dechucka wrote:
>>>>>> Assume he won't re-contest his seat.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'd like to think so but I wouldn't bet on it.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> He won't go to a by-election as Labor would win given the WA
>>>> situation. I would think his position is untenable to run again given
>>>> all the baggage he is carrying,
>>>> This should not be the end of the matter a Member of Parliament
>>>> accepting a $million still reeks. It should be referred to the Federal
>>>> ICAC, OH WAIT a couple of years after we were promised one nothing has
>>>> happened.
>>>
>>> And, aren't we still waiting for the investigation into Sam Nastari (or
>>> whatever his name is) and his dealing with that Chinese millionaire??
>>
>> His dealings were out in the open while being very stupid, what is funny
>> is that Porter led the attack on Dasrari. The difference is that Porter
>> is a Minister in government who refuses to say where the money came
>> from. Money does not magically appear in your account you can always
>> tell were it came from or maybe he got it in a ALDI bag. Either way
>> AUSTRAC would be interested in the deposit.
>>
>> Love the use of 'Blind Trust' to try and sanitise receiving the money. I
>> will suggest very cynically and without basis that Palmer is involved.
>> This needs a hell of a lot more investigation and not by the PM's Department
>>
> More leftie rubbish
> Snarky, smarmy, carping, snide, deceit, distortion, slag offing,
> denial, lying, spin, twisting, belittling, Dumb 3 smear merchants!
>
Other wise known as reality and facts.

On 19/09/2021 6:13 pm, Dechucka wrote:
> On 19/09/2021 5:50 pm, Fran wrote:
>> On 19/09/2021 3:49 pm, Dechucka wrote:
>>> Assume he won't re-contest his seat.
>>
>> I'd like to think so but I wouldn't bet on it.
>
>
> He won't go to a by-election as Labor would win given the WA situation.

I see today he's saying he'll re-contest.

> I would think his position is untenable to run again given all the
> baggage he is carrying,

I'd assume so but I don't know enough about what's happening in the West.

> This should not be the end of the matter a Member of Parliament
> accepting a $million still reeks.

Yep. Turnbull is right when he likens it to the bloke turning up with a
chaff bag full of cash.

It should be referred to the Federal
> ICAC, OH WAIT a couple of years after we were promised one nothing has
> happened.

Sad innit?

On 20/09/2021 6:28 am, Dechucka wrote:
> On 19/09/2021 10:42 pm, Daniel65 wrote:
>> Dechucka wrote on 19/9/21 6:13 pm:
>>> On 19/09/2021 5:50 pm, Fran wrote:
>>>> On 19/09/2021 3:49 pm, Dechucka wrote:
>>>>> Assume he won't re-contest his seat.
>>>>
>>>> I'd like to think so but I wouldn't bet on it.
>>>
>>>
>>> He won't go to a by-election as Labor would win given the WA
>>> situation. I would think his position is untenable to run again given
>>> all the baggage he is carrying,
>>> This should not be the end of the matter a Member of Parliament
>>> accepting a $million still reeks. It should be referred to the
>>> Federal ICAC, OH WAIT a couple of years after we were promised one
>>> nothing has happened.
>>
>> And, aren't we still waiting for the investigation into Sam Nastari
>> (or whatever his name is) and his dealing with that Chinese millionaire??
>
> His dealings were out in the open while being very stupid, what is funny
> is that Porter led the attack on Dasrari. The difference is that Porter
> is a Minister in government who refuses to say where the money came
> from. Money does not magically appear in your account you can always
> tell were it came from or maybe he got it in a ALDI bag. Either way
> AUSTRAC would be interested in the deposit.
>
> Love the use of 'Blind Trust' to try and sanitise receiving the money. I
> will suggest very cynically and without basis that Palmer is involved.
> This needs a hell of a lot more investigation and not by the PM's
> Department

Yep. Dastyari at least gave a name on the Register or Pecuniary
Interests and then did the decent thing and left. These LNP wankers
aren't even up to Dastyari's standard (which was darned low).

On 20/09/2021 8:32 am, Dechucka wrote:
> On 20/09/2021 8:26 am, Mikhail Gorbachev wrote:
>> Dechucka wrote:
>>> On 19/09/2021 10:42 pm, Daniel65 wrote:
>>> His dealings were out in the open while being very stupid, what is
>>> funny is that Porter led the attack on Dasrari. The difference is
>>> that Porter is a Minister in government who refuses to say where the
>>> money came from. Money does not magically appear in your account you
>>> can always tell were it came from or maybe he got it in a ALDI bag.
>>> Either way AUSTRAC would be interested in the deposit.
>>>
>>> Love the use of 'Blind Trust' to try and sanitise receiving the
>>> money. I will suggest very cynically and without basis that Palmer is
>>> involved.
>>> This needs a hell of a lot more investigation and not by the PM's
>>> Department
>>>
>>
>> Da, wondering who put the cash into the blind trust.
>
> It wasn't a blind trust.
>
>> Maybe Porter's chums from Hale School, now successful and rich? But
>> they would know this is just wrong. About the only suspect stupid
>> enough to think they could get away with it is Clive Palmer.
>
> Porter knows where the money came from but is now saying it was given on
> basis of confidentiality
>
> https://www.betootaadvocate.com/advocate-in-focus/porter-says-the-only-blind-trust-he-knows-about-is-what-old-people-have-for-the-liberals/

:-)) Wonderfully reliable source!

(As an aside, are those boobs below the article for real?)

On 20/09/2021 12:46 pm, Fran wrote:
> On 19/09/2021 6:13 pm, Dechucka wrote:
>> On 19/09/2021 5:50 pm, Fran wrote:
>>> On 19/09/2021 3:49 pm, Dechucka wrote:
>>>> Assume he won't re-contest his seat.
>>>
>>> I'd like to think so but I wouldn't bet on it.
>>
>>
>> He won't go to a by-election as Labor would win given the WA situation.
>
> I see today he's saying he'll re-contest.
>
>> I would think his position is untenable to run again given all the
>> baggage he is carrying,
>
> I'd assume so but I don't know enough about what's happening in the West.
>
>> This should not be the end of the matter a Member of Parliament
>> accepting a $million still reeks.
>
> Yep.  Turnbull is right when he likens it to the bloke turning up with a
> chaff bag full of cash.
>
> It should be referred to the Federal
>> ICAC, OH WAIT a couple of years after we were promised one nothing has
>> happened.
>
> Sad innit?
>
Iirc Howard suggested one. Many Parliaments with different parties later
nothing really has happened

On 20/09/2021 8:57 am, Petzl wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Sep 2021 06:28:46 +1000, Dechucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 19/09/2021 10:42 pm, Daniel65 wrote:
>>> Dechucka wrote on 19/9/21 6:13 pm:
>>>> On 19/09/2021 5:50 pm, Fran wrote:
>>>>> On 19/09/2021 3:49 pm, Dechucka wrote:
>>>>>> Assume he won't re-contest his seat.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'd like to think so but I wouldn't bet on it.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> He won't go to a by-election as Labor would win given the WA
>>>> situation. I would think his position is untenable to run again given
>>>> all the baggage he is carrying,
>>>> This should not be the end of the matter a Member of Parliament
>>>> accepting a $million still reeks. It should be referred to the Federal
>>>> ICAC, OH WAIT a couple of years after we were promised one nothing has
>>>> happened.
>>>
>>> And, aren't we still waiting for the investigation into Sam Nastari (or
>>> whatever his name is) and his dealing with that Chinese millionaire??
>>
>> His dealings were out in the open while being very stupid, what is funny
>> is that Porter led the attack on Dasrari. The difference is that Porter
>> is a Minister in government who refuses to say where the money came
>> from. Money does not magically appear in your account you can always
>> tell were it came from or maybe he got it in a ALDI bag. Either way
>> AUSTRAC would be interested in the deposit.
>>
>> Love the use of 'Blind Trust' to try and sanitise receiving the money. I
>> will suggest very cynically and without basis that Palmer is involved.
>> This needs a hell of a lot more investigation and not by the PM's Department
>>
> More leftie rubbish
> Snarky, smarmy, carping, snide, deceit, distortion, slag offing,
> denial, lying, spin, twisting, belittling, Dumb 3 smear merchants!

FYI and education about blind trusts and that the "Legal Services Trust"
was not a blind trust for Porter. So where did the $1million come from,
receiving money like this is just as bad for a back-bencher as it for a
Minister.

https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/australia/what-is-a-blind-trust-and-what-role-did-it-play-in-christian-porters-resignation/ar-AAODTXU
What is a blind trust and what role did it play in Christian Porter's
resignation?
>