A somewhat contradictory predicament is currently playing out in Spain when it comes to active travel; as in the same year that its Ministry of Transport just approved the allocation of 600 million euros to promote urban cycling, its Ministry of Economic Affairs and Digital Transformation wants to bring 'personal mobility vehicles' under regular motor vehicle regulations, meaning that electric bicycles will require compulsory insurance.

According to El Mundo (link is external) and other Spanish news outlets, the Spanish Bicycle Board, made up of notable cyclists, legal professionals and bike manufacturers, says the system is unworkable and is at odds with European regulations.

These regulations specifically separate pedal assist vehicles (up to a certain wattage and assisted speed) from non-pedal assist like electric scooters and pedelecs, with Spanish Bicycle Board spokesman Jesús Freire saying the ministerial proposal has got this distinction mixed up, therefore does not make sense.

Alfonso Treviño, general secretary of the Association of Professional Cyclists, blames lobbying from insurance companies for ministries suggesting that e-bikes should be insured, claiming that it could be a cash cow for them.

Treviño told El Mundo: "Compulsory insurance would be disproportionate and would discourage the use of bicycles, which is what is intended to decongest traffic, eliminate pollution in cities and promote healthy habits."

The dispute has been rumbling since at least 2018, when Spanish minister Fernando Grande Marlaska proposed compulsory insurance (link is external).

At the time, the Spanish cycling advocacy group ConBici asked for Spain's General Traffic Regulations to be replaced with a mobility law that would "recognise the bicycle as a better vehicle" to put a stop calls for e-bikes to be brought under motor vehicle regulations.

On social media, some have asked what the proposed changes would mean for tourists visiting the country who want to hire or use an e-bike. Others slammed the Government, with one calling it "useless and pusillanimous."

Despite the idea of compulsory insurance for all cyclists, e-bike or not, being popular with the general public - with two-thirds of respondents to a 2020 YouGov poll believing that cyclists should be made to have insurance - in reality the few places worldwide that have introduced such schemes have often found them to be expensive and detrimental to cycling numbers.

Switzerland abandoned its compulsory bike insurance laws in 2012 with cost thought to be a deciding factor, and to our knowledge no country in the world legally requires pedal cyclists to be insured and/or licenced in 2022.

> Minister repeats there is no prospect of requiring cyclists to be licensed in answer to 'Mr Loophole’ petition

https://road.cc/content/news/mandatory-bike-insurance-spain-291997

On 17/04/2022 12:58 pm, swldx...@gmail.com wrote:

> A somewhat contradictory predicament is currently playing out in Spain when it comes to active travel; as in the same year that its Ministry of Transport just approved the allocation of 600 million euros to promote urban fairy-cycling, its Ministry of Economic Affairs and Digital Transformation wants to bring 'personal mobility vehicles' under regular motor vehicle regulations, meaning that electric fairy-bicycles will require compulsory insurance.

What's wrong with that?

All civilised societies should insist on the same rule.
>
> According to El Mundo (link is external) and other Spanish news outlets, the Spanish Fairy-Bicycle Board, made up of notable fairy-cyclists, legal professionals and fairy-bike manufacturers, says the system is unworkable and is at odds with European regulations.
>
> These regulations specifically separate pedal assist vehicles (up to a certain wattage and assisted speed) from non-pedal assist like electric scooters and pedelecs, with Spanish Fairy-Bicycle Board spokesman Jesús Freire saying the ministerial proposal has got this distinction mixed up, therefore does not make sense.
>
> Alfonso Treviño, general secretary of the Association of Professional Fairy-Cyclists, blames lobbying from insurance companies for ministries suggesting that e-bikes should be insured, claiming that it could be a cash cow for them.
>
> Treviño told El Mundo: "Compulsory insurance would be disproportionate and would discourage the use of fairy-bicycles, which is what is intended to decongest traffic, eliminate pollution in cities and promote healthy habits."
>
> The dispute has been rumbling since at least 2018, when Spanish minister Fernando Grande Marlaska proposed compulsory insurance (link is external).
>
> At the time, the Spanish fairy-cycling advocacy group ConBici asked for Spain's General Traffic Regulations to be replaced with a mobility law that would "recognise the fairy-bicycle as a better vehicle" to put a stop calls for e-bikes to be brought under motor vehicle regulations.

After all, what do the victims of fairy-cycle riders - whether injured,
killed or merely having their property damaged - really matter, eh?
>
> On social media, some have asked what the proposed changes would mean for tourists visiting the country who want to hire or use an e-fairy-bike. Others slammed the Government, with one calling it "useless and pusillanimous."
>
> Despite the idea of compulsory insurance for all fairy-cyclists, e-bike or not, being popular with the general public - with two-thirds of respondents to a 2020 YouGov poll believing that fairy-cyclists should be made to have insurance - in reality the few places worldwide that have introduced such schemes have often found them to be expensive and detrimental to fairy-cycling numbers.

Does YouGove conduct surveys in Spain too, then?

> Switzerland abandoned its compulsory fairy-bike insurance laws in 2012 with cost thought to be a deciding factor, and to our knowledge no country in the world legally requires pedal fairy-cyclists to be insured and/or licenced in 2022.
>
>> Minister repeats there is no prospect of requiring fairy-cyclists to be licensed in answer to 'Mr Loophole’ petition
>
> https://road.cc/content/news/mandatory-bike-insurance-spain-291997
>

Looks like Pedro Arsehole is as "successful" as his UK counterpart. :-)