On 12/11/2021 7:41 PM, lindsay wrote:
> On 2/12/2021 7:23 pm, lindsay wrote:
>> On 29/11/2021 8:54 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>
>>>> I'll give you another chance to show the planes "without wings" (AS
>>>> YOU SAID) landing safely... here's what *you* snipped, you sad old
>>>> spineless flog:
>>>>
>>>> "Show me where I'm wrong. Show me the P-47 missing a WHOLE wing.
>>>> Show me the F-15 crashing because it was missing a major part of
>>>> it's wing. Show me the original video you posted is real. Go, on
>>>> Felix, in front of everyone, show me where I'm wrong, and your right.
>>>>
>>>> Bet you'll attempt to take the intellectual high ground, but with
>>>> *nothing* to back up your shit.  You'll run away with your fingers
>>>> in your ears going nah nah nah, hurling abuse over your shoulder as
>>>> you usually do.
>>>>
>>>> Grow some nuts, and show me where I'm wrong, and your right.
>>>>
>>>> Show me."
>>>>
>>>> Waiting....
>>
>>
>> Still nothing....Sorry Fetid,  I was going to let this slide, because
>> you obviously dont handle facts, truth and usenet too well, but fuckk
>> it, it's Felix.!!! The Banner Bearer for the FLC!!! :-D
>
> So, 9 days later, are you going to respond, or are you going to prove
> to all what the FLC are... a bunch of loud-mouthed spineless cunts who
> run when shown to be wrong? (you know.. Tomas Clasener et al...)
>
>>>>> you're sick in the head and need help
>
> What a non - suprise. Rather than "grow some nuts", you've publicly
> shown yourself to be a spineless cunt. Again.
>>>>
>>>> And, as predicted, you wiped what would show you to be the simple
>>>> sad old suck, lickspittle and dumb cunt you are, and *did exactly
>>>> as I said you would: you ran away rather than answer*, to hide
>>>> behind others skirts... as usual.
>>>>
>>>> What a spineless loser you are, Fetid.  "Grow some nuts" You?
>>>> Hahahahahahaha  So predictable...
>>>>
>>>> Dont forget to remind everyone how intelligent you are again, after
>>>> being shown to be an absolute dullard, Spazpecker. That is funny.:-D
>
>>> I have already explained it to you, but u are such a brainless idiot
>>> it's not getting thru.
>>
>> No, you haven't.
>
> And still haven't. You've hoisted your skirt, squealed that you've
> answered, and ran away. As the FLC do.
>
>  But I can spell better than you, Fetid. You've snipped
>> the lot, sauntered off claiming your intelligence is greater than
>> Deep Thought, and done the pigeon strut.
>>
>> Here, let's try again, for the intellectually handicapped amongst us
>> (thats you, Felix, you fucking senile flog..)
>>
>>> let me spell it out for you then.. you are a crass disgusting
>>> asshole who I have no wish or desire to know or talk to, which is
>>> why i ignore you,
>>
>> Yet here you are, Spazpecker the Dull! .... Who created the post
>> titled "for linsey", you silly old flog?  Just another Fetid fail.
>> "which is why i ignore you" ... You're not really showing yourself in
>> a good light, Fetid... :-D
>>
>>> but since it seems I must reply... there is no 'right' or 'wrong' u
>>> fuckin moron.
>>
>> So there's no left or right either? No port or starboard? No wing or
>> part thereof? No lift, or crash?
>>
>> You don't get to make the rules, Fetid. YOU claimed planes can fly
>> with one wing. The examples you provided show planes with damaged
>> wings still flying. A big difference. You know what wings are for,
>> right, Einstein?
>>
>>> I posted a video of a plane flying with no wing.
>>
>> *FFS*, *tell the truth!* if you can.!!!. You posted a video of a
>> radio controlled *model plane*. A toy, if you will. A fake video. A
>> video, which has a video of it's making. You fell for it. Sucker.
>
> Silence. Niot going to admit your mistake? No.. it's too hard isn't it...
>
>
>>> I don't recall what I said about it, if anything,
>
> I do.
>
>>> but it was shown by u and or others to be fake, and I accepted that.
>
> No. I don't think you did... or this thread would exist.
>
>>
>> Right *AFTER* you were told it was a fake. But it seems you didn't
>> accept it, Fetid, otherwise you wouldn't have made your post, titled
>> "for linsey", a few days ago. You posted a link to a utube vid of a
>> P-47 with wing *damage*, (less than half gone - 1250mm), not fucking
>> "MISSING", you fucking stupid dickhead. Why, if not to attempt to
>> alleviate your hilarious whoopsie of a toy plane landing with a
>> missing wing... Then you admitted to the same thing with the F-15
>> video, except the F-15's wing WASNT completely gone, has more thrust
>> than weight, more thrust than a newer F/A-18, and has large
>> stabilizators to supply lift.. Whoops! :-D
>>
>>> so I don't know what the fuck you are on about.
>>
>> Felix, you don't know what the fuck YOU'RE on about. :-D It's a
>> common trait with the FLC.... Perhaps if you read, rather than snip....
>>
>>> I have never tried to claim it was real, u dumb ass cunt!
>
> Sure? :-D Google tells all, Fetid!!! :-D
>
>> Ohh, you "crass disgusting asshole"...! Bwahahahahahahahaa
>>
>> Really? You sure about that? "I don't recall what I said about it, if
>> anything.." You don't recall, but you never tried to claim it was
>> real? :-D  Another face-plant. :-D
>>
>>> so now that you've dragged me into your
>>> sewer u must be happy,
>>
>> I dragged you nowhere, Fetid. You created this thread,not me. You
>> want to poke, (linsey)? I'm happy to poke back. It's already been
>> established that you arent the sharpest knife in the drawer...
>>
>>  > and you've got a reply in language that makes
>>> sense to you, so now fuck off! EOD.
>>
>> EOD for you, shitlips. You don't get to make the rules, Spazpecker.
>> As you like to bray, you make the claim, you get to back it up,
>> right? You started this thread, at least allow me the finish 1t :-)
>>
>> So here you go :->>>>> Show me a *real* plane with it's *complete*
>> wing missing/removed, and capable of flight until it touches down on
>> a runway. Not a tot/RC model. Not a P-47 with some wing damage. Not
>> an F-15 D Eagle with massive wing damage  but more thrust and
>> stabilazators... Anything!!!
>>
>> And no, the toy video thats been modified, that you thought was real,
>> doesn't count. A real plane, Fetid. Not a toy. Not Lego. Away you go...
>>
>> OTY.
>
> Silence. As Fetid Felix squeaks "not me and runs away. As usual.
>
> I'm probably in some sort of his convenient killfile again. Fetid just
> cant make up his mind which one, or how long. Again.
>
> "You put linsey in,
> you pull linsey out,
> you make a fool of yourself in usenet
> and you hope your mates you pull you out...
>
> Get help, Fetid.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 Hmmmm, Succinct...;)

>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>

--
"Usenet is like a herd of performing elephants with diarrhea. Massive,
difficult to redirect, awe-inspiring, entertaining, and a source of
mind-boggling amounts of excrement when you least expect it." — Gene
Spafford, 1992

On 12/12/2021 3:20 pm, Xeno wrote:
> On 12/12/21 6:31 am, alvey wrote:
>
>>
>> lol!
>>
>> You're whinging about waiting "9 days"? Awwwww. Nine whole days? We've
>> been
>> waiting *years* for your little mate to respond to the compelling, and in
>> some cases, *irrefutable* proof that he's a fraud and a liar. And
>> these are
>> on *significant* matters too, not the inane and pissy trivia which are
>> your
>> forte. And you suggesting that *anyone* other than your craven mates are
>> "...spineless cunts who run when shown to be wrong", is the yellow
>> highlighter of insanity in your raving.
>>
>>
>>
>> alvey
>>
>>
> Lots of insanity in those ravings. 20+ years of ravings and rantings
> about the *career highlights* of a serial bullshit artist. Still
> wriggling on the hook!
>

He cast a net of deception for 20+ years and is now caught up in it with
no escape.

On 12/12/2021 6:20 pm, Xeno wrote:
> On 12/12/21 6:31 am, alvey wrote:
>
>>
>> lol!
>>
>> You're whinging about waiting "9 days"? Awwwww. Nine whole days?
>> We've been
>> waiting *years* for your little mate to respond to the compelling,
>> and in
>> some cases, *irrefutable* proof that he's a fraud and a liar. And
>> these are
>> on *significant* matters too, not the inane and pissy trivia which
>> are your
>> forte. And you suggesting that *anyone* other than your craven mates are
>> "...spineless cunts who run when shown to be wrong", is the yellow
>> highlighter of insanity in your raving.
>>
>>
>>
>> alvey
>>
>>
> Lots of insanity in those ravings. 20+ years of ravings and rantings
> about the *career highlights* of a serial bullshit artist. Still
> wriggling on the hook!
>

linsey is as big a liar as nodnuts, and a raving looney

--
"his opinions have been crushed into insignificant dust
by the enormous weight of his lies" - Alvey on Derro

On 12/12/2021 5:30 pm, Clocky wrote:
> On 12/12/2021 3:31 am, alvey wrote:
>> On Sat, 11 Dec 2021 19:41:49 +1100, lindsay wrote:
>>
>>> On 2/12/2021 7:23 pm, lindsay wrote:
>>>> On 29/11/2021 8:54 pm, Yosemite Sam wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> I'll give you another chance to show the planes "without wings" (AS
>>>>>> YOU SAID) landing safely...   here's what *you* snipped, you sad old
>>>>>> spineless flog:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Show me where I'm wrong. Show me the P-47 missing a WHOLE wing.
>>>>>> Show
>>>>>> me the F-15 crashing because it was missing a major part of it's
>>>>>> wing. Show me the original video you posted is real. Go, on
>>>>>> Felix, in
>>>>>> front of everyone, show me where I'm wrong, and your right.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bet you'll attempt to take the intellectual high ground, but with
>>>>>> *nothing* to back up your shit.  You'll run away with your
>>>>>> fingers in
>>>>>> your ears going nah nah nah, hurling abuse over your shoulder as you
>>>>>> usually do.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Grow some nuts, and show me where I'm wrong, and your right.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Show me."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Waiting....
>>>>
>>>> Still nothing....Sorry Fetid,  I was going to let this slide, because
>>>> you obviously dont handle facts, truth and usenet too well, but fuckk
>>>> it, it's Felix.!!! The Banner Bearer for the FLC!!! :-D
>>>
>>> So, 9 days later, are you going to respond, or are you going to
>>> prove to
>>> all what the FLC are... a bunch of loud-mouthed spineless cunts who run
>>> when shown to be wrong? (you know.. Tomas Clasener et al...)
>>
>> lol!
>>
>> You're whinging about waiting "9 days"? Awwwww. Nine whole days?

except I've already replied twice. he's as crazy as a cut snake

>> We've been
>> waiting *years* for your little mate to respond to the compelling,
>> and in
>> some cases, *irrefutable* proof that he's a fraud and a liar. And
>> these are
>> on *significant* matters too, not the inane and pissy trivia which
>> are your
>> forte. And you suggesting that *anyone* other than your craven mates are
>> "...spineless cunts who run when shown to be wrong", is the yellow
>> highlighter of insanity in your raving.
>>
>
> Never a truer word spoken :-)
>

--
"his opinions have been crushed into insignificant dust
by the enormous weight of his lies" - Alvey on Derro

On 9/12/2021 12:31 pm, Clocky wrote:
> On 8/12/2021 6:33 pm, Noddy wrote:
>> On 8/12/2021 5:00 pm, Daryl wrote:
>>> On 8/12/21 10:14 am, Noddy wrote:
>>
>>>> They make great Pizza's, but they make thoroughly shithouse cars
>>>> and anyone who wanted to own one is either ignorant beyond belief
>>>> or has incredibly deep pockets and is willing to spend some time
>>>> driving a "loner".
>>>>
>>>>
>>> I think where people get caught out is that Italian cars can be
>>> great drives when they are running well, too bad that feeling
>>> doesn't last.
>>
>> Yep. Reliability just isn't their thing.
>>
>>
>>
>
> Far from the worst brands.
>
> According to the link below it's on par with that of BMW with one
> difference, the repairs on the Alfa are cheaper. Mercedes are not much
> better.
>
> Fiat fared much better than BMW or Mercedes, in fact on par with Hyundai!
>
> https://www.carwow.co.uk/blog/most-and-least-reliable-car-brands-revealed

no surprise the top three

>
> Now it's true that this data comes from an aftermarket warranty
> provider and may not carry as much weight as the baseless opinions of
> some uneducated and unqualified narcissistic fringe dwelling bogan
> with a propensity to lie and hate rage with jealousy but I'll leave it
> to the discerning reader to decide who to believe.
>
>
>
>

--
"his opinions have been crushed into insignificant dust
by the enormous weight of his lies" - Alvey on Derro

On 7/12/2021 6:44 pm, Noddy wrote:
> On 7/12/2021 6:31 pm, keithr0 wrote:
>> On 4/12/2021 11:51 pm, Clocky wrote:
>
>>> It fitting Keith drives what was previously described as a
>>> "hairdressers car" since he's now being groomed for FLCJC membership
>>> by Derro!
>>>
>>
>> I am not a member of any of the tribes here, and never will be.
>> Neither"Side" is at all appealing.
>
> Don't worry keith, as I don't think anyone was considering offering you
> a membership application :)
>

So he's not stupid, irrational, illogical or dishonest enough to qualify
for the FLCJC - and/or is capable of critical thought.

Welcome to our club Keith :-)

On Sunday, 12 December 2021 at 19:02:39 UTC+11, Clocky wrote:
> On 12/12/2021 3:20 pm, Xeno wrote:
> > On 12/12/21 6:31 am, alvey wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> lol!
> >>
> >> You're whinging about waiting "9 days"? Awwwww. Nine whole days? We've
> >> been
> >> waiting *years* for your little mate to respond to the compelling, and in
> >> some cases, *irrefutable* proof that he's a fraud and a liar. And
> >> these are
> >> on *significant* matters too, not the inane and pissy trivia which are
> >> your
> >> forte. And you suggesting that *anyone* other than your craven mates are
> >> "...spineless cunts who run when shown to be wrong", is the yellow
> >> highlighter of insanity in your raving.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> alvey
> >>
> >>
> > Lots of insanity in those ravings. 20+ years of ravings and rantings
> > about the *career highlights* of a serial bullshit artist. Still
> > wriggling on the hook!
> >
> He cast a net of deception for 20+ years and is now caught up in it with
> no escape.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
And so are the days of our lives........HAHAHA.
https://i.imgflip.com/2cdtyu.jpg