A DRIVER that struck a teenage boy while he was riding his bike is being sought by the police.

The incident happened on the road between Flaxton and Howsham at approximately 1pm on Sunday (May 30) and involved a silver-grey Mercedes CLA vehicle thought to be a 2020 model.

This vehicle collided with the boy who was cycling in a group of around 10 friends. The boy was thrown from his cycle and sustained injuries down the right side of his body.

A spokesperson for the force said: “The Mercedes, which was described as travelling at high speed, failed to stop at the scene and has not reported the incident to the police since.

“A member of the public driving a Range Rover-type vehicle stopped at the scene to assist the boy and officers are also appealing for them to come forward as they had left prior to the incident being reported to the police.

“Police would also like to speak to any other members of the public who may have seen the Mercedes in the area around the time of this collision or has any other information that could help officers trace the driver.”

Anyone with information that could assist the investigation should contact North Yorkshire Police on 101, select option 2, and ask for Neal Mackleston on the safer neighbourhood service desk. You can also email Neal.mackleston@northyorkshire.pnn.police.uk

If you wish to remain anonymous, you can pass information to Crimestoppers on 0800 555 111.

Quote the incident number: 12210129277.

https://www.gazetteherald.co.uk/news/19341884.teenage-cyclist-injured-hit-run-near-howsham/

On 01/06/2021 20:22, swldx...@gmail.com wrote:

> A DRIVER that struck a teenage boy while he was riding his bike is
> being sought by the police.

Nice to see them to come to the point instead of the habitual "a driver
is being sought after a teenage cyclist was in collision with a car".

On 02/06/2021 09:04 am, TMS320 wrote:

> On 01/06/2021 20:22, swldx...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> A DRIVER that struck a teenage boy while he was riding his bike is
>> being sought by the police.
>
> Nice to see them to come to the point instead of the habitual "a driver
> is being sought after a teenage cyclist was in collision with a car".

Was it perhaps an assault with a fist?

On 02/06/2021 12:16, JNugent wrote:
> On 02/06/2021 09:04 am, TMS320 wrote:
>> On 01/06/2021 20:22, swldx...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>> A DRIVER that struck a teenage boy while he was riding his bike is
>>> being sought by the police.
>>
>> Nice to see them to come to the point instead of the habitual "a
>> driver is being sought after a teenage cyclist was in collision with a
>> car".
>
> Was it perhaps an assault with a fist?

If you read the article, you will find that a clear suggestion that the
driver was directing the movement of a car. You would find this is a
pretty common factor in road casualty events.

On 03/06/2021 12:43 pm, TMS320 wrote:

> On 02/06/2021 12:16, JNugent wrote:
>> On 02/06/2021 09:04 am, TMS320 wrote:
>>> On 01/06/2021 20:22, swldx...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>>>> A DRIVER that struck a teenage boy while he was riding his bike is
>>>> being sought by the police.
>
>>> Nice to see them to come to the point instead of the habitual "a
>>> driver is being sought after a teenage cyclist was in collision with
>>> a car".
>
>> Was it perhaps an assault with a fist?
>
> If you read the article, you will find that a clear suggestion that the
> driver was directing the movement of a car. You would find this is a
> pretty common factor in road casualty events.

Which "article" would that be?

I was replying to you, and you cited no "article" or website.

What you actually said was ambiguous at the least and could easily have
stemmed from an alleged assault of the fisticuffs kind.

On 03/06/2021 14:48, JNugent wrote:
> On 03/06/2021 12:43 pm, TMS320 wrote:
>> On 02/06/2021 12:16, JNugent wrote:
>>> On 02/06/2021 09:04 am, TMS320 wrote:
>>>> On 01/06/2021 20:22, swldx...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>>>> A DRIVER that struck a teenage boy while he was riding his bike is
>>>>> being sought by the police.
>>
>>>> Nice to see them to come to the point instead of the habitual "a
>>>> driver is being sought after a teenage cyclist was in collision with
>>>> a car".
>>
>>> Was it perhaps an assault with a fist?
>>
>> If you read the article, you will find that a clear suggestion that
>> the driver was directing the movement of a car. You would find this is
>> a pretty common factor in road casualty events.
>
> Which "article" would that be?

Here's a clue -
On 01/06/2021 20:22, swldx...@gmail.com wrote:

On 03/06/2021 05:33 pm, TMS320 wrote:
> On 03/06/2021 14:48, JNugent wrote:
>> On 03/06/2021 12:43 pm, TMS320 wrote:
>>> On 02/06/2021 12:16, JNugent wrote:
>>>> On 02/06/2021 09:04 am, TMS320 wrote:
>>>>> On 01/06/2021 20:22, swldx...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> A DRIVER that struck a teenage boy while he was riding his bike is
>>>>>> being sought by the police.
>>>
>>>>> Nice to see them to come to the point instead of the habitual "a
>>>>> driver is being sought after a teenage cyclist was in collision
>>>>> with a car".
>>>
>>>> Was it perhaps an assault with a fist?
>>>
>>> If you read the article, you will find that a clear suggestion that
>>> the driver was directing the movement of a car. You would find this
>>> is a pretty common factor in road casualty events.
>>
>> Which "article" would that be?
>
> Here's a clue -
> On 01/06/2021 20:22, swldx...@gmail.com  wrote:

If there were anything relevant in whatever you are referring to, you
would re-quote it.

On 03/06/2021 20:28, JNugent wrote:
> On 03/06/2021 05:33 pm, TMS320 wrote:
>> On 03/06/2021 14:48, JNugent wrote:
>>> On 03/06/2021 12:43 pm, TMS320 wrote:
>>>> On 02/06/2021 12:16, JNugent wrote:
>>>>> On 02/06/2021 09:04 am, TMS320 wrote:
>>>>>> On 01/06/2021 20:22, swldx...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>> A DRIVER that struck a teenage boy while he was riding his bike is
>>>>>>> being sought by the police.
>>>>
>>>>>> Nice to see them to come to the point instead of the habitual "a
>>>>>> driver is being sought after a teenage cyclist was in collision
>>>>>> with a car".
>>>>
>>>>> Was it perhaps an assault with a fist?
>>>>
>>>> If you read the article, you will find that a clear suggestion that
>>>> the driver was directing the movement of a car. You would find this
>>>> is a pretty common factor in road casualty events.
>>>
>>> Which "article" would that be?
>>
>> Here's a clue -
>> On 01/06/2021 20:22, swldx...@gmail.com  wrote:
>
> If there were anything relevant in whatever you are referring to, you
> would re-quote it.

You read Simon's postings so don't claim ignorance when you posted your
first reply.

On 04/06/2021 10:10 am, TMS320 wrote:
> On 03/06/2021 20:28, JNugent wrote:
>> On 03/06/2021 05:33 pm, TMS320 wrote:
>>> On 03/06/2021 14:48, JNugent wrote:
>>>> On 03/06/2021 12:43 pm, TMS320 wrote:
>>>>> On 02/06/2021 12:16, JNugent wrote:
>>>>>> On 02/06/2021 09:04 am, TMS320 wrote:
>>>>>>> On 01/06/2021 20:22, swldx...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> A DRIVER that struck a teenage boy while he was riding his bike is
>>>>>>>> being sought by the police.
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nice to see them to come to the point instead of the habitual "a
>>>>>>> driver is being sought after a teenage cyclist was in collision
>>>>>>> with a car".
>>>>>
>>>>>> Was it perhaps an assault with a fist?
>>>>>
>>>>> If you read the article, you will find that a clear suggestion that
>>>>> the driver was directing the movement of a car. You would find this
>>>>> is a pretty common factor in road casualty events.
>>>>
>>>> Which "article" would that be?
>>>
>>> Here's a clue -
>>> On 01/06/2021 20:22, swldx...@gmail.com  wrote:
>>
>> If there were anything relevant in whatever you are referring to, you
>> would re-quote it.
>
> You read Simon's postings so don't claim ignorance when you posted your
> first reply.

Sometimes I read them. Sometimes I don't. I rarely follow links in
anybody's postings.

Either way, they don't stay on my computer once (automatically) marked
as "read".

If and when you have a point to try to make, why not just make the
attempt, supported by whatever "evidence" you think is relevant?

On 04/06/2021 11:11, JNugent wrote:

> If and when you have a point to try to make, why not just make the
> attempt, supported by whatever "evidence" you think is relevant?

I was replying to Simon. Either work out what is going on or don't butt in.

On 04/06/2021 05:08 pm, TMS320 wrote:
> On 04/06/2021 11:11, JNugent wrote:
>
>> If and when you have a point to try to make, why not just make the
>> attempt, supported by whatever "evidence" you think is relevant?
>
> I was replying to Simon. Either work out what is going on or don't butt in.

You were in fact replying to me.

On 04/06/2021 17:19, JNugent wrote:
> On 04/06/2021 05:08 pm, TMS320 wrote:
>> On 04/06/2021 11:11, JNugent wrote:
>>
>>> If and when you have a point to try to make, why not just make the
>>> attempt, supported by whatever "evidence" you think is relevant?
>>
>> I was replying to Simon. Either work out what is going on or don't
>> butt in.
>
> You were in fact replying to me.

Don't be stupid.

On 04/06/2021 05:08 pm, TMS320 wrote:

> On 04/06/2021 11:11, JNugent wrote:
>
>> If and when you have a point to try to make, why not just make the
>> attempt, supported by whatever "evidence" you think is relevant?
>
> I was replying to Simon. Either work out what is going on or don't butt in.

How did your private email to whichever Simon you mean get posted into a
usenet newsgroup?

On Wednesday, June 2, 2021 at 9:04:46 AM UTC+1, TMS320 wrote:
> On 01/06/2021 20:22, swldx...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > A DRIVER that struck a teenage boy while he was riding his bike is
> > being sought by the police.
> Nice to see them to come to the point instead of the habitual "a driver
> is being sought after a teenage cyclist was in collision with a car".

Good to see the snarlword "accident" being absent from the report.

On 11/07/2022 20:29, swldx...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 2, 2021 at 9:04:46 AM UTC+1, TMS320 wrote:
>> On 01/06/2021 20:22, swldx...@gmail.com wrote:

>>> A DRIVER that struck a teenage boy while he was riding his bike is
>>> being sought by the police.

>> Nice to see them to come to the point instead of the habitual "a driver
>> is being sought after a teenage cyclist was in collision with a car".
> Good to see the snarlword "accident" being absent from the report.

Was the accident a deliberate then?

Much in the same way as a 'near miss' implies there was a target to be hit?

--
Spike

On Wednesday, June 2, 2021 at 9:04:46 AM UTC+1, TMS320 wrote:
> On 01/06/2021 20:22, swldx...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > A DRIVER that struck a teenage boy while he was riding his bike is
> > being sought by the police.
> Nice to see them to come to the point instead of the habitual "a driver
> is being sought after a teenage cyclist was in collision with a car".

Yes - "a driver" is an actual person, rather than "a car" which in an inanimate object.
A driver was to blame, not a car.

On 12/07/2022 10:08, swldx...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 2, 2021 at 9:04:46 AM UTC+1, TMS320 wrote:
>> On 01/06/2021 20:22, swldx...@gmail.com wrote:

>>> A DRIVER that struck a teenage boy while he was riding his bike is
>>> being sought by the police.

>> Nice to see them to come to the point instead of the habitual "a driver
>> is being sought after a teenage cyclist was in collision with a car".

> Yes - "a driver" is an actual person, rather than "a car" which in an inanimate object.
> A driver was to blame, not a car.

So that's the verdict - when's the trial?

--
Spike

On 12/07/2022 09:17 am, Spike wrote:

> On 11/07/2022 20:29, swldx...@gmail.com [Del Boy Mason] wrote:
>> On Wednesday, June 2, 2021 at 9:04:46 AM UTC+1, TMS320 wrote:
>>> On 01/06/2021 20:22, swldx...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>>>> A DRIVER that struck a teenage boy while he was riding his bike is
>>>> being sought by the police.
>
>>> Nice to see them to come to the point instead of the habitual "a driver
>>> is being sought after a teenage cyclist was in collision with a car".

>> Good to see the snarlword "accident" being absent from the report.
>
> Was the accident a deliberate then?
>
> Much in the same way as a 'near miss' implies there was a target to be hit?

I'm not going to do anything about it until later today, but Del Boy
Mason's response in this thread at 20:29 last night proves that he is an
outright liar.

Alors! Quatre saisons!

I'll say more later.

QUOTE: The Mercedes, which was described as travelling at high speed, failed to stop at the scene. ENDS

I'm sure that the driver will hand themselves in soon.
Or something.

On 12/07/2022 11:16 am, JNugent wrote:

> On 12/07/2022 09:17 am, Spike wrote:
>> On 11/07/2022 20:29, swldx...@gmail.com [Del Boy Mason] wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, June 2, 2021 at 9:04:46 AM UTC+1, TMS320 wrote:
>>>> On 01/06/2021 20:22, swldx...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>>>>> A DRIVER that struck a teenage boy while he was riding his bike is
>>>>> being sought by the police.
>
>>>> Nice to see them to come to the point instead of the habitual "a driver
>>>> is being sought after a teenage cyclist was in collision with a car".
>
>>> Good to see the snarlword "accident" being absent from the report.
>
>> Was the accident a deliberate then?
>
>> Much in the same way as a 'near miss' implies there was a target to be
>> hit?
>
> I'm not going to do anything about it until later today, but Del Boy
> Mason's response in this thread at 20:29 last night [Monday 13/07/22] proves
> that he is an outright liar.
> Alors! Quatre saisons!
> I'll say more later.

It's too late at night now. I'll leave it until Wednesday pm at the
earliest.

Astute readers may already be able to guess.

QUOTE: “The Mercedes, which was described as travelling at high speed, failed to stop at the scene and has not reported the incident to the police since. ENDS

Two offences for the price of one!

On 13/07/2022 12:59 am, JNugent wrote:
> On 12/07/2022 11:16 am, JNugent wrote:
>
>> On 12/07/2022 09:17 am, Spike wrote:
>>> On 11/07/2022 20:29, swldx...@gmail.com [Del Boy Mason] wrote:
>>>> On Wednesday, June 2, 2021 at 9:04:46 AM UTC+1, TMS320 wrote:
>>>>> On 01/06/2021 20:22, swldx...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>>>>> A DRIVER that struck a teenage boy while he was riding his bike is
>>>>>> being sought by the police.
>>
>>>>> Nice to see them to come to the point instead of the habitual "a
>>>>> driver
>>>>> is being sought after a teenage cyclist was in collision with a car".
>>
>>>> Good to see the snarlword "accident" being absent from the report.
>>
>>> Was the accident a deliberate then?
>>
>>> Much in the same way as a 'near miss' implies there was a target to
>>> be hit?
>>
>> I'm not going to do anything about it until later today, but Del Boy
>> Mason's response in this thread at 20:29 last night [Monday 13/07/22]
>> proves
>> that he is an outright liar.
>> Alors! Quatre saisons!
>> I'll say more later.
>
> It's too late at night now. I'll leave it until Wednesday pm at the
> earliest.
>
> Astute readers may already be able to guess.

I haven't forgotten.

Just can't be bothered ATM.

QUOTE: This vehicle collided with the boy who was cycling in a group of around 10 friends. The boy was thrown from his cycle and sustained injuries down the right side of his body. ENDS

They couldn't see ELEVEN children? Needs to have their licence revoked.

On 14/07/2022 05:32 pm, swldx...@gmail.com wrote:

> QUOTE: This vehicle collided with the boy who was cycling in a group of around 10 friends. The boy was thrown from his cycle and sustained injuries down the right side of his body. ENDS
>
> They couldn't see ELEVEN children? Needs to have their licence revoked.

That's right, Del Boy... keep digging...

QUOTE: “A member of the public driving a Range Rover-type vehicle stopped at the scene to assist the boy and officers are also appealing for them to come forward as they had left prior to the incident being reported to the police. ENDS

This driver will come forward as they are an innocent eye witness to the collision.