https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-65794363

<quotes>

A school district in the US state of Utah has removed the Bible from elementary and middle schools for containing "vulgarity and violence".

The move follows a complaint from a parent that the King James Bible has material unsuitable for children.

Utah's Republican government passed a law in 2022 banning "pornographic or indecent" books from schools.

Officials say they have already removed the seven or eight copies of the Bible they had on their shelves

The committee did not elaborate on its reasoning or which passages contained "vulgarity or violence".

</quotes>

It would be an effort to list all the passages which are problematic in the Bible, and most so-called Christians won't even be aware of them, have never taken in what the Bible says, if they have read it at all.

The usual 'go to' is Ezekiel 23:20 which describes suitors as being hung like donkeys and coming like horses, or as the NKJV puts it -

Ezekiel 23:20 - For she lusted for her paramours, Whose flesh is like the flesh of donkeys, And whose issue is like the issue of horses.

Other verses also read more like something from the Book of Bukkake than what one expects to find in the Bible. And, as for violence, one doesn't need to look further than later in the same book -

Ezekiel 23:46 - For thus says the Lord God: 'Bring up an assembly against them, give them up to trouble and plunder. The assembly shall stone them with stones and execute them with their swords; they shall slay their sons and their daughters, and burn their houses with fire'.

One can understand why some aren't comfortable with that, giving fascists, ANTIFA, or anyone else, the defence they were only dong what God told them to do.

The Happy Hippy wrote:
> https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-65794363
>
> <quotes>
>
> A school district in the US state of Utah has removed the Bible from elementary and middle schools for containing "vulgarity and violence".
>
> The move follows a complaint from a parent that the King James Bible has material unsuitable for children.
>
> Utah's Republican government passed a law in 2022 banning "pornographic or indecent" books from schools.
>
> Officials say they have already removed the seven or eight copies of the Bible they had on their shelves
>
> The committee did not elaborate on its reasoning or which passages contained "vulgarity or violence".
>
> </quotes>
>
> It would be an effort to list all the passages which are problematic in the Bible, and most so-called Christians won't even be aware of them, have never taken in what the Bible says, if they have read it at all.
>
> The usual 'go to' is Ezekiel 23:20 which describes suitors as being hung like donkeys and coming like horses, or as the NKJV puts it -
>
>
> Ezekiel 23:20 - For she lusted for her paramours, Whose flesh is like the flesh of donkeys, And whose issue is like the issue of horses.
>
>
> Other verses also read more like something from the Book of Bukkake than what one expects to find in the Bible. And, as for violence, one doesn't need to look further than later in the same book -
>
>
> Ezekiel 23:46 - For thus says the Lord God: 'Bring up an assembly against them, give them up to trouble and plunder. The assembly shall stone them with stones and execute them with their swords; they shall slay their sons and their daughters, and burn their houses with fire'.
>
>
> One can understand why some aren't comfortable with that, giving fascists, ANTIFA, or anyone else, the defence they were only dong what God told them to do.
>
Is that why there are so many muslim pedos, because their spiritual
leader would only fuck pre teen virgins ??

--
Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for
light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter.

On Sat, 3 Jun 2023 13:35:52 -0400
JeSSe <zo@so.org> wrote:

> The Happy Hippy wrote:
> > https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-65794363
> >
> > <quotes>
> >
> > A school district in the US state of Utah has removed the Bible
> > from elementary and middle schools for containing "vulgarity and
> > violence".
> >
> > The move follows a complaint from a parent that the King James
> > Bible has material unsuitable for children.
> >
> > Utah's Republican government passed a law in 2022 banning
> > "pornographic or indecent" books from schools.
> >
> > Officials say they have already removed the seven or eight copies
> > of the Bible they had on their shelves
> >
> > The committee did not elaborate on its reasoning or which passages
> > contained "vulgarity or violence".
> >
> > </quotes>
> >
> > It would be an effort to list all the passages which are
> > problematic in the Bible, and most so-called Christians won't even
> > be aware of them, have never taken in what the Bible says, if they
> > have read it at all.
> >
> > The usual 'go to' is Ezekiel 23:20 which describes suitors as being
> > hung like donkeys and coming like horses, or as the NKJV puts it -
> >
> >
> > Ezekiel 23:20 - For she lusted for her paramours, Whose flesh is
> > like the flesh of donkeys, And whose issue is like the issue of
> > horses.
> >
> >
> > Other verses also read more like something from the Book of Bukkake
> > than what one expects to find in the Bible. And, as for violence,
> > one doesn't need to look further than later in the same book -
> >
> >
> > Ezekiel 23:46 - For thus says the Lord God: 'Bring up an assembly
> > against them, give them up to trouble and plunder. The assembly
> > shall stone them with stones and execute them with their swords;
> > they shall slay their sons and their daughters, and burn their
> > houses with fire'.
> >
> >
> > One can understand why some aren't comfortable with that, giving
> > fascists, ANTIFA, or anyone else, the defence they were only dong
> > what God told them to do.
>
> Is that why

As usual, with nothing constructive or relevant to say, you simply use it to spew your bile and hatred.

No one's surprised - it's what propagandist scum do.

Maybe it's why so many White Americans are into buggering their dogs and sodomising children. Maybe not, but it it's surprising how often those things crop up when White Americans are dragged into court for their crimes.

Perhaps you could tell us why they do it ?

The Happy Hippy wrote:

>>
>> Is that why
>
> As usual,
Huh, you say something ?
Enough hot air here without you
--
Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for
light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter.

On Sat, 3 Jun 2023 22:06:00 -0400
JeSSe <zo@so.org> wrote:

> The Happy Hippy wrote:
>
> >>
> >> Is that why
> >
> > As usual,
> Huh, you say something ?
> Enough hot air here without you

That's a rarity - something which is true. You don't need me to produce hot air when you produce enough hot air all by yourself.

The Happy Hippy wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Jun 2023 22:06:00 -0400
> JeSSe <zo@so.org> wrote:
>
>> The Happy Hippy wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>>> Is that why
>>>
>>> As usual,
>> Huh, you say something ?
>> Enough hot air here without you
>
> something which is true.
>
Absolutely true

--
Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for
light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter.

On Sun, 4 Jun 2023 13:35:47 -0400
JeSSe <zo@so.org> wrote:

> The Happy Hippy wrote:
> > On Sat, 3 Jun 2023 22:06:00 -0400
> > JeSSe <zo@so.org> wrote:
> >
> >> The Happy Hippy wrote:
> >>
> >>>>
> >>>> Is that why
> >>>
> >>> As usual,
> >> Huh, you say something ?
> >> Enough hot air here without you
> >
> > something which is true.
> >
> Absolutely true

Agreed, there's enough hot air here without me. As you said. As I agreed. And you agreed again, as have I.

Do you really not feel you are wasting your life away ? Perhaps your masters pay you by the word or by those post. It's the only explanation I can thing of.

On Sat, 3 Jun 2023 16:57:15 +0100
The Happy Hippy <the.happy.hippy.nntp@ntlworld.invalid> wrote:

> The usual 'go to' is Ezekiel 23:20 which describes suitors as being
> hung like donkeys and coming like horses, or as the NKJV puts it -
>
> Ezekiel 23:20 - For she lusted for her paramours, Whose flesh is like
> the flesh of donkeys, And whose issue is like the issue of horses.

I'd forgotten what a good read Ezekiel is. Not only do we have that, there's the golden dildos -

Ezekiel 16:17 - Thou hast also taken thy fair jewels of my gold and of my silver, which I had given thee, and madest to thyself images of men, and didst commit whoredom with them.

And if that's not your thing there's the date-rape incest stuff in Genesis 19:30-36 -

Genesis 19:36 - Thus both the daughters of Lot were with child by their father.

One can't blame Lot for sticking to his "pissed as a fart, I didn't notice nuffin" story. Some might say he had it coming, having offered his daughters up for gang rape earlier on.

It's far from the only tale of rape and incest in the Bible. And if you want something racier, one can perhaps tilt towards cunnilingus -

Solomon 4:16 - Blow upon my garden, That its spices may flow out. Let my beloved come to his garden And eat its pleasant fruits.

Though I'm not sure about this -

Solomon 5:4 - My beloved put in his hand by the hole of the door, and my bowels were moved for him.

Can't think why some people might think it's not the sort of thing they want their children reading.

The Happy Hippy wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Jun 2023 13:35:47 -0400
> JeSSe <zo@so.org> wrote:
>
>> The Happy Hippy wrote:
>>> On Sat, 3 Jun 2023 22:06:00 -0400
>>> JeSSe <zo@so.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The Happy Hippy wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is that why
>>>>>
>>>>> As usual,
>>>> Huh, you say something ?
>>>> Enough hot air here without you
>>>
>>> something which is true.
>>>
>> Absolutely true
>
> Agreed,
Good, then STFU.
Will not engage in the tit for tat demonization that you crave, even as
you trash your very own thread because you don't want to get into
muslims worshiping a renowned pedophile.
--
Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for
light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter.

The Happy Hippy wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Jun 2023 13:35:47 -0400
> JeSSe <zo@so.org> wrote:
>
>> The Happy Hippy wrote:
>>> On Sat, 3 Jun 2023 22:06:00 -0400
>>> JeSSe <zo@so.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The Happy Hippy wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is that why
>>>>>
>>>>> As usual,
>>>> Huh, you say something ?
>>>> Enough hot air here without you
>>>
>>> something which is true.
>>>
>> Absolutely true
>
> Agreed, there's enough hot air here without me. As you said. As I agreed. And you agreed again, as have I.
>
> Do you really not feel you are wasting your life away ? Perhaps your masters pay you by the word or by those post. It's the only explanation I can thing of.

Only thing you can thing of hmmm ok.
Can't thing of nothing else ??

The childless spinster, self confessed [and unemployed] "proud
communist" and wannabe antifa terrorist complains about others wasting
their lives away ?

Pure projection that wingnuts are renowned for - You are even worse
since you are just a cheap copycat, getting 100% of your talking points
straight from the Bolsheviks.
When was the last time you were off your little island, if ever ?

--
Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for
light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter.

On Sun, 4 Jun 2023 22:14:10 -0400
JeSSe <zo@so.org> wrote:

> The Happy Hippy wrote:
> > On Sun, 4 Jun 2023 13:35:47 -0400
> > JeSSe <zo@so.org> wrote:
> >
> >> The Happy Hippy wrote:
> >>> On Sat, 3 Jun 2023 22:06:00 -0400
> >>> JeSSe <zo@so.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> The Happy Hippy wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Is that why
> >>>>>
> >>>>> As usual,
> >>>> Huh, you say something ?
> >>>> Enough hot air here without you
> >>>
> >>> something which is true.
> >>>
> >> Absolutely true
> >
> > Agreed, there's enough hot air here without me. As you said. As I
> > agreed. And you agreed again, as have I.
> >
> > Do you really not feel you are wasting your life away ? Perhaps
> > your masters pay you by the word or by those post. It's the only
> > explanation I can thing of.
>
> Only thing you can thing of hmmm ok.
> Can't thing of nothing else ??

Well there's also being an idiot or troll, probably both.

> When was the last time you were off your little island, if ever ?

You tell me who you voted for and I'll tell you when I last ventured out of the UK.

I'm not as ashamed or frightened to answer simple questions as you are. Not that it is in any way relevant.

As you said; there's enough hot air here without me and I have agreed with you.

The Happy Hippy wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Jun 2023 22:14:10 -0400
> JeSSe <zo@so.org> wrote:
>
>> The Happy Hippy wrote:
>>> On Sun, 4 Jun 2023 13:35:47 -0400
>>> JeSSe <zo@so.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The Happy Hippy wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 3 Jun 2023 22:06:00 -0400
>>>>> JeSSe <zo@so.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> The Happy Hippy wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Is that why
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As usual,
>>>>>> Huh, you say something ?
>>>>>> Enough hot air here without you
>>>>>
>>>>> something which is true.
>>>>>
>>>> Absolutely true
>>>
>>> Agreed, there's enough hot air here without me. As you said. As I
>>> agreed. And you agreed again, as have I.
>>>
>>> Do you really not feel you are wasting your life away ? Perhaps
>>> your masters pay you by the word or by those post. It's the only
>>> explanation I can thing of.
>>
>> Only thing you can thing of hmmm ok.
>> Can't thing of nothing else ??
>
> Well there's also being an idiot or troll, probably both.
>
>
>> When was the last time you were off your little island, if ever ?
>
> You tell me who you voted for and I'll tell you when I last ventured out of the UK.
>
> I'm not as ashamed or frightened to answer simple questions as you are. Not that it is in any way relevant.

Not ashamed or frightened to answer simple questions, ok lets see about
that, I have a simple 5 word question for you:
"Why don't you have kids ?"

If you feel like being honest and open for once, then tell us why don't
you have kids, it would likely go a long away to explain your constant
bitterness and jaundiced world view.
Something fucked up, decades in the making, you couldn't find a mate,
you couldn't reproduce - That is abnormal, unless its a physical ailment
like crushed nuts, lets get to the root of it, where/how/when did you
fuck up ? I think its more like a crushed soul, correct ?

I'd rather hear about your non existent kids and the reasons why you
were unable to find a woman to be fruitful with, but you always snip
that topic for some reason.
Can't say I blame you, you failed in the primary purpose of life, and
failed miserably. You'll die cold & lonely, sooner rather than later,
and hopefully the corroded Xippy name and bloodline dies with you, as
mine thrives.
I realize that is a harsh thing to say, but its the truth, and as we all
know, the truth can be colder than ice.

Your abject and unrecoverable [in this lifetime] failure can be a lesson
to others on how NOT to live a life, so go ahead, if you aren't too
ashamed or frightened, tell everyone WHY DON'T YOU HAVE KIDS ?

Genesis 1:28

--
Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for
light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter.

On Mon, 5 Jun 2023 13:36:01 -0400
JeSSe <zo@so.org> wrote:

Nothing of any consequence.

You are still dodging answering the who did you vote for question, still too ashamed and frightened to do so.

The Happy Hippy wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Jun 2023 13:36:01 -0400
> JeSSe <zo@so.org> wrote:
>
> Nothing of any consequence.
>
> You are still dodging answering the who did you vote for question, still too ashamed and frightened to do so.
>

And I quote YOU:

> I'm not as ashamed or frightened to answer simple questions as you are.

So you really are shamed AND frightened to answer a simple question, and
resort to a mass snip like a child covering its eyes.

WHY DON'T YOU HAVE KIDS ?
Simple question, you can even lie and say you really do have them, along
with imaginary ex wives, just have never reference them in 20 years.

--
Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for
light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter.

On Tue, 6 Jun 2023 14:17:56 -0400
JeSSe <zo@so.org> wrote:

> The Happy Hippy wrote:
> > On Mon, 5 Jun 2023 13:36:01 -0400
> > JeSSe <zo@so.org> wrote:
> >
> > Nothing of any consequence.
> >
> > You are still dodging answering the who did you vote for question,
> > still too ashamed and frightened to do so.
>
> And I quote YOU:
>
> > I'm not as ashamed or frightened to answer simple questions as you
> > are.

And that's true. You are the one not answering the question. Your tactic is merely typical question dodging shit.

Everyone can see that, and it doesn't matter how you try and dig yourself out of the hole you have dug yourself into.